| Post | Date |
| RE: Great Barrier Reef Problem | 31-05-2016 17:23 |
| RE: Global Warming | 30-05-2016 17:26 |
| RE: Great Barrier Reef Problem | 30-05-2016 17:20 |
| RE: Long Term Climate Change Perspective | 24-05-2016 04:44 |
| RE: Long Term Climate Change Perspective | 24-05-2016 04:38 |
| RE: West coast of England rainfall | 24-05-2016 01:07 |
| RE: If CO2 incrreases to 10000 ppm, wouldn't everyone die from CO2 poisoning and there would be no change | 24-05-2016 00:07 |
| RE: Longer term with ice caps | 20-05-2016 19:02 |
| RE: Long Term Climate Change Perspective | 15-05-2016 02:37 |
| RE: New way to tackle Climate Change | 11-05-2016 15:50 |
| RE: Jimmy Kimmel on Climate Change | 05-05-2016 05:39 |
| RE: Welcome to a much greener Earth! | 03-05-2016 20:30 |
| RE: What is the Problem Presented by CO2? | 22-04-2016 17:09 |
| RE: What is the Problem Presented by CO2? | 22-04-2016 13:51 |
| RE: What is the Problem Presented by CO2? | 21-04-2016 02:42 |
| RE: Long Term Climate Change Perspective | 08-04-2016 07:01 |
| RE: Whales | 03-04-2016 19:44 |
| RE: Dissertation Survey | 26-03-2016 17:40 |
| RE: Hilarious scientifically illiterate posts by 'greenhouse' effect deniers | 22-03-2016 12:26 |
| RE: What are the best climate change organizations? | 20-03-2016 19:58 |
| RE: Apparently it's WEATHER Change | 15-03-2016 16:02 |
| RE: Brrrr, The February 2016 COLD RECORD! | 15-03-2016 12:49 |
| RE: Febuary breaks records by a shocking amount | 15-03-2016 11:59 |
| RE: Febuary breaks records by a shocking amount | 14-03-2016 13:20 |
| Brrrr, The February 2016 COLD RECORD! | 14-03-2016 13:15 |
| RE: Febuary breaks records by a shocking amount | 14-03-2016 12:33 |
| RE: THE GLOBAL COOLING CONSENSUS IN THE 1970s | 13-03-2016 18:16 |
| RE: What has changed | 11-03-2016 14:28 |
| RE: THE GLOBAL COOLING CONSENSUS IN THE 1970s | 11-03-2016 14:10 |
| RE: What has changed | 11-03-2016 01:14 |
| RE: INEQUALITY AND OPPRESSION | 11-03-2016 01:07 |
| RE: What has changed | 10-03-2016 15:56 |
| RE: What has changed | 09-03-2016 00:00 |
| RE: What has changed | 07-03-2016 21:29 |
| RE: What has changed | 07-03-2016 17:45 |
| RE: What Went Wrong? | 07-03-2016 17:13 |
| RE: What Went Wrong? | 07-03-2016 13:37 |
| RE: What has changed | 07-03-2016 13:00 |
| RE: What has changed | 07-03-2016 03:40 |
| What Went Wrong? | 06-03-2016 19:31 |
| RE: What has changed | 06-03-2016 19:25 |
| RE: the only way to know if more CO2 causes warmer climate is to do the experiment on Earth | 04-03-2016 04:42 |
| RE: the only way to know if more CO2 causes warmer climate is to do the experiment on Earth | 03-03-2016 21:18 |
| RE: the only way to know if more CO2 causes warmer climate is to do the experiment on Earth | 03-03-2016 19:16 |
| RE: Best US presidential candidate | 03-03-2016 02:21 |
| RE: Best US presidential candidate | 02-03-2016 19:30 |
| RE: Best US presidential candidate | 02-03-2016 17:14 |
| RE: Best US presidential candidate | 02-03-2016 12:34 |
| RE: Best US presidential candidate | 01-03-2016 22:54 |
| RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease. | 01-03-2016 14:42 |
| RE: THE GLOBAL COOLING CONSENSUS IN THE 1970s | 29-02-2016 19:07 |
| RE: THE GLOBAL COOLING CONSENSUS IN THE 1970s | 29-02-2016 17:18 |
| RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease. | 29-02-2016 16:13 |
| RE: THE GLOBAL COOLING CONSENSUS IN THE 1970s | 29-02-2016 15:32 |
| RE: How can scientists know Earth's greenhouse effect is not because of its atmospheric pressure? | 29-02-2016 14:00 |
| RE: THE GLOBAL COOLING CONSENSUS IN THE 1970s | 29-02-2016 13:52 |
| RE: How can scientists know Earth's greenhouse effect is not because of its atmospheric pressure? | 29-02-2016 13:05 |
| RE: There is no Scientific Consensus on Global Warming | 29-02-2016 03:16 |
| RE: IPCC does not allow Chinese scientists and data, so we do not accept IPCC's position | 29-02-2016 01:07 |
| RE: There is no Scientific Consensus on Global Warming | 29-02-2016 00:45 |
| RE: THE GLOBAL COOLING CONSENSUS IN THE 1970s | 28-02-2016 23:33 |
| RE: THE GLOBAL COOLING CONSENSUS IN THE 1970s | 28-02-2016 23:10 |
| RE: THE GLOBAL COOLING CONSENSUS IN THE 1970s | 28-02-2016 22:38 |
| RE: THE GLOBAL COOLING CONSENSUS IN THE 1970s | 28-02-2016 17:17 |
| RE: THE GLOBAL COOLING CONSENSUS IN THE 1970s | 28-02-2016 16:57 |
| RE: There is no Scientific Consensus on Global Warming | 27-02-2016 17:41 |
| RE: THE GLOBAL COOLING CONSENSUS IN THE 1970s | 27-02-2016 17:30 |
| RE: IPCC does not allow Chinese scientists and data, so we do not accept IPCC's position | 26-02-2016 21:14 |
| RE: There is no Scientific Consensus on Global Warming | 26-02-2016 19:48 |
| RE: IPCC does not allow Chinese scientists and data, so we do not accept IPCC's position | 26-02-2016 16:29 |
| RE: IPCC does not allow Chinese scientists and data, so we do not accept IPCC's position | 26-02-2016 13:02 |
| RE: There is no Scientific Consensus on Global Warming | 25-02-2016 20:26 |
| RE: IPCC does not allow Chinese scientists and data, so we do not accept IPCC's position | 25-02-2016 19:41 |
| RE: IPCC does not allow Chinese scientists and data, so we do not accept IPCC's position | 25-02-2016 19:23 |
| RE: IPCC does not allow Chinese scientists and data, so we do not accept IPCC's position | 25-02-2016 15:50 |
| RE: There is no Scientific Consensus on Global Warming | 25-02-2016 15:44 |
| RE: There is no Scientific Consensus on Global Warming | 25-02-2016 15:33 |
| RE: IPCC does not allow Chinese scientists and data, so we do not accept IPCC's position | 25-02-2016 15:28 |
| RE: IPCC does not allow Chinese scientists and data, so we do not accept IPCC's position | 25-02-2016 13:47 |
| RE: Are Hallstattzeit Cycles a Cause of Global Warming? | 25-02-2016 05:07 |
| RE: IPCC does not allow Chinese scientists and data, so we do not accept IPCC's position | 25-02-2016 01:20 |
| RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease. | 24-02-2016 23:28 |
| RE: How can scientists know Earth's greenhouse effect is not because of its atmospheric pressure? | 24-02-2016 19:23 |
| RE: There is no Scientific Consensus on Global Warming | 24-02-2016 19:20 |
| RE: IPCC does not allow Chinese scientists and data, so we do not accept IPCC's position | 24-02-2016 15:42 |
| RE: There is no Scientific Consensus on Global Warming | 24-02-2016 15:38 |
| RE: No one cares even if 97% of climate scientists think more CO2 causes warmer weather. Because of Galileo. | 24-02-2016 14:32 |
| RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease. | 24-02-2016 14:18 |
| RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease. | 24-02-2016 13:16 |
| RE: There is no Scientific Consensus on Global Warming | 24-02-2016 12:44 |
| RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease. | 24-02-2016 04:04 |
| RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease. | 24-02-2016 01:36 |
| RE: There is no Scientific Consensus on Global Warming | 24-02-2016 01:15 |
| RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease. | 23-02-2016 22:45 |
| RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease. | 23-02-2016 13:16 |
| RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease. | 23-02-2016 00:33 |
| RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease. | 22-02-2016 21:07 |
| RE: IPCC does not allow Chinese scientists and data, so we do not accept IPCC's position | 22-02-2016 13:10 |
| RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease. | 22-02-2016 13:05 |
| RE: What if Greenland Was on the North Pole? | 22-02-2016 04:39 |
| RE: ... And the heat goes on! ... | 22-02-2016 04:35 |
| RE: ... And the heat goes on! ... | 22-02-2016 04:20 |
| RE: ... And the heat goes on! ... | 22-02-2016 01:27 |
| RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease. | 22-02-2016 00:50 |
| RE: What if Greenland Was on the North Pole? | 21-02-2016 21:09 |
| RE: ... And the heat goes on! ... | 21-02-2016 21:03 |
| RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease. | 21-02-2016 18:27 |
| RE: What if Greenland Was on the North Pole? | 21-02-2016 16:35 |
| RE: ... And the heat goes on! ... | 21-02-2016 16:29 |
| RE: ... And the heat goes on! ... | 21-02-2016 06:29 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 21-02-2016 06:10 |
| RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease. | 21-02-2016 05:55 |
| RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease. | 21-02-2016 03:16 |
| RE: ... And the heat goes on! ... | 21-02-2016 02:44 |
| RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease. | 20-02-2016 18:27 |
| RE: climate change media stories made me so sick I never google climate change ever again | 20-02-2016 02:47 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 20-02-2016 02:38 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 19-02-2016 21:09 |
| RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease. | 19-02-2016 20:02 |
| RE: Teaching younger generations | 19-02-2016 18:47 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 19-02-2016 18:43 |
| RE: But Global Warming is Good for Us, isn't it? | 19-02-2016 18:32 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 19-02-2016 16:34 |
| RE: But Global Warming is Good for Us, isn't it? | 19-02-2016 16:01 |
| RE: Here in China, anyone who talks about global warming will be labeled a liberal and arrested and locked up | 19-02-2016 13:22 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 19-02-2016 05:37 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 19-02-2016 05:11 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 19-02-2016 05:03 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 19-02-2016 03:11 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 19-02-2016 00:01 |
| RE: Here in China, anyone who talks about global warming will be labeled a liberal and arrested and locked up | 18-02-2016 23:57 |
| RE: If the emissivity of a body decreases then its temperature should decrease. | 18-02-2016 23:54 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 18-02-2016 22:28 |
| RE: Here in China, anyone who talks about global warming will be labeled a liberal and arrested and locked up | 18-02-2016 20:00 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 18-02-2016 19:58 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 18-02-2016 19:33 |
| RE: Teaching younger generations | 18-02-2016 19:27 |
| RE: Teaching younger generations | 18-02-2016 19:09 |
| RE: Teaching younger generations | 18-02-2016 15:29 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 18-02-2016 13:53 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 18-02-2016 13:12 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 18-02-2016 03:08 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 18-02-2016 03:01 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 18-02-2016 02:54 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 18-02-2016 02:44 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 18-02-2016 02:09 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 18-02-2016 01:56 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 18-02-2016 01:26 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 18-02-2016 00:19 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 17-02-2016 21:36 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 17-02-2016 14:34 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 17-02-2016 14:16 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 16-02-2016 22:35 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 16-02-2016 21:42 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 16-02-2016 21:11 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 16-02-2016 20:15 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 16-02-2016 17:17 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 16-02-2016 16:26 |
| RE: Hank Samler's Model | 16-02-2016 16:22 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 16-02-2016 14:37 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 16-02-2016 12:42 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 16-02-2016 03:28 |
| RE: Hank Samler's Model | 16-02-2016 03:16 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 16-02-2016 00:34 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 15-02-2016 22:36 |
| RE: Hank Samler's Model | 15-02-2016 20:34 |
| RE: Why don't IPCC build a tiny Earth, about the size of a mountain, floating in Earth's orbit, to do | 15-02-2016 20:27 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 15-02-2016 20:11 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 15-02-2016 20:08 |
| RE: Hank Samler's Model | 15-02-2016 17:51 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 15-02-2016 16:45 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 15-02-2016 16:13 |
| RE: Global Warming and the consequences - is it real? | 15-02-2016 07:57 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 15-02-2016 02:13 |
| RE: Hank Samler's Model | 15-02-2016 01:52 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 14-02-2016 15:40 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 14-02-2016 15:40 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 14-02-2016 15:30 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 14-02-2016 15:26 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 14-02-2016 04:49 |
| RE: Western countries kowtow to Saudi Arabia buying billions of barrels of oil and increases CO2 and | 14-02-2016 00:01 |
| RE: Western countries kowtow to Saudi Arabia buying billions of barrels of oil and increases CO2 and | 13-02-2016 23:01 |
| RE: Why deny global warming | 13-02-2016 22:57 |
| RE: Hank Samler's Model | 13-02-2016 20:54 |
| RE: Global Warming and the consequences - is it real? | 13-02-2016 20:41 |
| RE: Hank Samler's Model | 13-02-2016 06:35 |
| RE: Hank Samler's Model | 12-02-2016 21:25 |
| RE: ITS THE SUN, STUPID | 12-02-2016 21:15 |
| RE: ITS THE SUN, STUPID | 12-02-2016 17:23 |
| RE: Hank Samler's Model | 12-02-2016 17:19 |
| RE: ITS THE SUN, STUPID | 12-02-2016 16:34 |
| RE: ITS THE SUN, STUPID | 12-02-2016 16:12 |
| RE: Global Warming Bests Maxwell's Demon | 12-02-2016 06:02 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 12-02-2016 05:49 |
| RE: Hank Samler's Model | 12-02-2016 05:42 |
| RE: ITS THE SUN, STUPID | 12-02-2016 05:33 |
| RE: Hank Samler's Model | 12-02-2016 02:31 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 11-02-2016 23:33 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 11-02-2016 23:16 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 11-02-2016 22:56 |
| RE: ITS THE SUN, STUPID | 11-02-2016 22:23 |
| RE: CO2 the Magic Gas! | 11-02-2016 20:56 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 11-02-2016 20:47 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 11-02-2016 20:45 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 11-02-2016 15:28 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 11-02-2016 07:06 |
| RE: Hank Samler's Model | 11-02-2016 02:01 |
| RE: people despise climate scientists because they have a political agenda | 10-02-2016 22:48 |
| RE: CO2 the Magic Gas! | 10-02-2016 22:36 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 10-02-2016 22:10 |
| Hank Samler's Model | 10-02-2016 21:30 |
| RE: Global Warming Bests Maxwell's Demon | 10-02-2016 20:01 |
| RE: CO2 the Magic Gas! | 10-02-2016 19:59 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 10-02-2016 19:30 |
| Global Warming Bests Maxwell's Demon | 10-02-2016 17:01 |
| RE: CO2 the Magic Gas! | 10-02-2016 16:39 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 10-02-2016 14:23 |
| RE: Positives on Global Warming | 09-02-2016 22:51 |
| RE: CO2 makes Earth much cooler than the Moon because it blocks the Sun's IR | 09-02-2016 22:20 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 09-02-2016 20:57 |
| RE: Positives on Global Warming | 09-02-2016 20:50 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 09-02-2016 16:15 |
| RE: Positives on Global Warming | 09-02-2016 13:54 |
| RE: Positives on Global Warming | 09-02-2016 13:30 |
| RE: Tipping point | 09-02-2016 12:58 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 09-02-2016 05:41 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 09-02-2016 05:24 |
| RE: there is no evidence more CO2 traps more heat and heats the Earth | 09-02-2016 05:16 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 09-02-2016 04:51 |
| RE: Positives on Global Warming | 08-02-2016 22:46 |
| RE: Positives on Global Warming | 08-02-2016 22:43 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 08-02-2016 22:33 |
| RE: there is no evidence more CO2 traps more heat and heats the Earth | 08-02-2016 22:17 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 08-02-2016 15:26 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 08-02-2016 13:29 |
| RE: Positives on Global Warming | 08-02-2016 12:32 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 08-02-2016 01:26 |
| RE: Positives on Global Warming | 08-02-2016 01:19 |
| RE: Positives on Global Warming | 08-02-2016 01:06 |
| RE: Positives on Global Warming | 07-02-2016 08:41 |
| RE: CO2 makes Earth much cooler than the Moon because it blocks the Sun's IR | 07-02-2016 08:34 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 07-02-2016 08:29 |
| RE: Positives on Global Warming | 07-02-2016 04:04 |
| RE: Positives on Global Warming | 06-02-2016 21:44 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 06-02-2016 21:21 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 06-02-2016 20:47 |
| RE: Positives on Global Warming | 06-02-2016 00:23 |
| RE: stopping climate change | 06-02-2016 00:13 |
| RE: Positives on Global Warming | 06-02-2016 00:07 |
| RE: no one can refute this argument from deniers | 05-02-2016 20:48 |
| RE: Positives on Global Warming | 05-02-2016 20:43 |
| RE: no one can refute this argument from deniers | 05-02-2016 20:16 |
| RE: Positives on Global Warming | 05-02-2016 17:41 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 05-02-2016 17:32 |
| RE: Positives on Global Warming | 05-02-2016 17:13 |
| RE: stopping climate change | 05-02-2016 14:49 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 05-02-2016 14:47 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 05-02-2016 13:11 |
| RE: Positives on Global Warming | 04-02-2016 20:47 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 04-02-2016 20:44 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 04-02-2016 20:32 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 04-02-2016 20:28 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 04-02-2016 20:22 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 04-02-2016 00:20 |
| RE: Global Warming and the consequences - is it real? | 03-02-2016 19:01 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 03-02-2016 18:48 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 03-02-2016 18:38 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 03-02-2016 16:32 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 02-02-2016 22:58 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 02-02-2016 21:34 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 02-02-2016 21:20 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 02-02-2016 20:55 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 02-02-2016 20:07 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 02-02-2016 20:04 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 02-02-2016 19:05 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 02-02-2016 19:00 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 02-02-2016 18:54 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 02-02-2016 18:28 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 02-02-2016 18:11 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 02-02-2016 18:04 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 02-02-2016 14:10 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 02-02-2016 12:50 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 01-02-2016 22:47 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 01-02-2016 22:18 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 01-02-2016 16:09 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 01-02-2016 13:37 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 01-02-2016 13:32 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 01-02-2016 13:24 |
| RE: How can scientists know the 1 C increase in global average temperature was not all natural? | 01-02-2016 06:00 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 01-02-2016 05:44 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 01-02-2016 05:33 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 01-02-2016 05:27 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 01-02-2016 05:11 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 01-02-2016 05:02 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 31-01-2016 19:41 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 31-01-2016 19:35 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 31-01-2016 19:34 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 31-01-2016 17:24 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 31-01-2016 17:18 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 31-01-2016 16:10 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 31-01-2016 16:06 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 31-01-2016 05:04 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 31-01-2016 04:54 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 31-01-2016 04:34 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 31-01-2016 04:22 |
| RE: no one can refute this argument from deniers | 31-01-2016 04:13 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 31-01-2016 02:57 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 31-01-2016 01:47 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 31-01-2016 01:42 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 31-01-2016 01:35 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 30-01-2016 22:49 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 30-01-2016 22:40 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 30-01-2016 22:33 |
| RE: no one can refute this argument from deniers | 30-01-2016 22:31 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 30-01-2016 22:25 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 30-01-2016 22:20 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 30-01-2016 22:06 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 30-01-2016 21:59 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 30-01-2016 21:49 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 30-01-2016 21:44 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 30-01-2016 21:28 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 30-01-2016 17:33 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 30-01-2016 17:03 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 30-01-2016 17:01 |
| RE: Global Warming and the consequences - is it real? | 30-01-2016 01:48 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 30-01-2016 01:40 |
| RE: Global Warming and the consequences - is it real? | 30-01-2016 01:33 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 30-01-2016 01:28 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 30-01-2016 01:04 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 30-01-2016 00:39 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 30-01-2016 00:30 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 30-01-2016 00:11 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 30-01-2016 00:11 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 29-01-2016 21:54 |
| RE: Global Warming and the consequences - is it real? | 29-01-2016 21:53 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 29-01-2016 21:52 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 29-01-2016 21:37 |
| RE: Global Warming and the consequences - is it real? | 29-01-2016 21:31 |
| RE: Global Warming and the consequences - is it real? | 29-01-2016 21:26 |
| RE: What would the world be like if every molecule in the atmosphere is a CO2? | 29-01-2016 21:03 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 29-01-2016 21:01 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 29-01-2016 14:34 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 29-01-2016 13:59 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 29-01-2016 13:09 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 28-01-2016 22:51 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 28-01-2016 22:45 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 28-01-2016 13:01 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 28-01-2016 02:32 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 27-01-2016 22:54 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 27-01-2016 21:10 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 27-01-2016 21:04 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 27-01-2016 20:31 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 27-01-2016 15:50 |
| RE: no one cares about climate | 27-01-2016 15:43 |
| RE: But the Climate is Always Changing! | 27-01-2016 15:42 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 27-01-2016 15:21 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 27-01-2016 14:37 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 27-01-2016 02:29 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 27-01-2016 02:09 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 26-01-2016 18:15 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 25-01-2016 16:33 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 25-01-2016 16:09 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 25-01-2016 16:04 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 25-01-2016 15:03 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 25-01-2016 03:06 |
| RE: 2015: Warmest Year on Record | 25-01-2016 02:53 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 25-01-2016 02:42 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 24-01-2016 17:16 |
| RE: Welcome to the New Ice Age | 24-01-2016 17:10 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 24-01-2016 17:06 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 24-01-2016 16:22 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 24-01-2016 05:32 |
| RE: What would the world be like if the atmosphere is 25% O2 and 75% N2? | 23-01-2016 01:33 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 22-01-2016 14:12 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 21-01-2016 20:10 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 21-01-2016 16:08 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 21-01-2016 13:58 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 21-01-2016 13:50 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 21-01-2016 04:27 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 20-01-2016 22:44 |
| RE: Just How Many "Greenhouse Effects" Are There? | 20-01-2016 22:16 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 20-01-2016 22:06 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 20-01-2016 20:04 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 20-01-2016 19:00 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 20-01-2016 14:50 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 19-01-2016 20:03 |
| RE: Does the bad a$$ Dr. Pierrer Latour blow IPCC away? | 19-01-2016 15:16 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 19-01-2016 03:15 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 19-01-2016 00:45 |
| RE: Uh oh. More CO2 causes global cooling. | 16-01-2016 22:42 |
| RE: COP21 - Population policy | 16-01-2016 22:20 |
| RE: Uh oh. More CO2 causes global cooling. | 16-01-2016 21:59 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 16-01-2016 21:56 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 16-01-2016 21:43 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 16-01-2016 21:38 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 14-01-2016 22:27 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 14-01-2016 20:43 |
| RE: COP21 - Population policy | 14-01-2016 18:01 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 14-01-2016 17:27 |
| RE: COP21 - Population policy | 14-01-2016 15:28 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 14-01-2016 14:30 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 13-01-2016 19:26 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 13-01-2016 16:57 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 13-01-2016 15:44 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 13-01-2016 14:39 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 13-01-2016 13:37 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 13-01-2016 04:59 |
| RE: COP21 - Population policy | 13-01-2016 03:17 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 13-01-2016 03:10 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 12-01-2016 22:23 |
| RE: The entire greenhouse effect does not even add 0.1 C. The debate is over. The science is settled. | 12-01-2016 21:05 |
| RE: The entire greenhouse effect does not even add 0.1 C. The debate is over. The science is settled. | 12-01-2016 20:12 |
| RE: Christopher Columbus sailed into the unknown and discovered the New World. He should be our idol. | 12-01-2016 20:08 |
| RE: The entire greenhouse effect does not even add 0.1 C. The debate is over. The science is settled. | 12-01-2016 19:47 |
| RE: The entire greenhouse effect does not even add 0.1 C. The debate is over. The science is settled. | 12-01-2016 18:36 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 12-01-2016 18:33 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 12-01-2016 17:52 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 12-01-2016 14:23 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 12-01-2016 05:28 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 12-01-2016 02:32 |
| RE: The entire greenhouse effect does not even add 0.1 C. The debate is over. The science is settled. | 12-01-2016 01:45 |
| RE: Alarmists are wrong. The debate is over. | 11-01-2016 19:20 |
| RE: The entire greenhouse effect does not even add 0.1 C. The debate is over. The science is settled. | 11-01-2016 19:13 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 11-01-2016 19:10 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 11-01-2016 15:59 |
| RE: Alarmists are wrong. The debate is over. | 11-01-2016 15:13 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 11-01-2016 15:06 |
| RE: Alarmists are wrong. The debate is over. | 11-01-2016 14:41 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 11-01-2016 14:36 |
| RE: Will the world (this generation) allow one man to fix things? | 11-01-2016 14:15 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 11-01-2016 13:50 |
| RE: both sides are wrong | 11-01-2016 01:02 |
| RE: Does the bad a$$ Dr. Pierrer Latour blow IPCC away? | 10-01-2016 18:32 |
| RE: Does the bad a$$ Dr. Pierrer Latour blow IPCC away? | 10-01-2016 16:14 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 10-01-2016 08:35 |
| RE: If Earth's atmosphere consists entirely of O2, Earth's be 33 C colder? Really? Seriously? | 10-01-2016 08:20 |
| RE: build artificial lakes? | 08-01-2016 21:17 |
| RE: Greenhouse effect theory violates the second law of thermodynamics | 08-01-2016 21:12 |
| Why did Global Warming put the Record Freeze on Hudson Valley? | 08-01-2016 20:47 |
| RE: the difference between light and heat | 08-01-2016 19:48 |
| RE: Greenhouse effect theory violates the second law of thermodynamics | 08-01-2016 17:31 |
| RE: Greenhouse effect theory violates the second law of thermodynamics | 08-01-2016 17:27 |
| RE: Why the CO2 mirror analogy is wrong | 08-01-2016 15:49 |
| RE: CO2 blocks the Sun's incoming short wave and blocks Earth's outgoing long wave, so increasing it | 08-01-2016 15:32 |
| RE: Why the CO2 mirror analogy is wrong | 08-01-2016 15:17 |
| RE: Greenhouse effect theory violates the second law of thermodynamics | 08-01-2016 14:41 |
| RE: CO2 blocks the Sun's incoming short wave and blocks Earth's outgoing long wave, so increasing it | 08-01-2016 14:38 |
| RE: Greenhouse effect theory violates the second law of thermodynamics | 08-01-2016 14:23 |
| RE: CO2 blocks the Sun's incoming short wave and blocks Earth's outgoing long wave, so increasing it | 08-01-2016 14:14 |
| RE: Will the world (this generation) allow one man to fix things? | 08-01-2016 14:11 |
| RE: Why does greenhouse effect make Earth's surface so cool compared to what it would otherwise be? | 07-01-2016 22:47 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 07-01-2016 20:35 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 07-01-2016 20:33 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 07-01-2016 19:47 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 07-01-2016 19:29 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 07-01-2016 19:00 |
| RE: Why does greenhouse effect make Earth's surface so cool compared to what it would otherwise be? | 07-01-2016 18:34 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 07-01-2016 18:31 |
| RE: Why does greenhouse effect make Earth's surface so cool compared to what it would otherwise be? | 07-01-2016 18:08 |
| RE: Why does greenhouse effect make Earth's surface so cool compared to what it would otherwise be? | 07-01-2016 17:40 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 07-01-2016 17:35 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 07-01-2016 16:34 |
| RE: Why does greenhouse effect make Earth's surface so cool compared to what it would otherwise be? | 07-01-2016 16:33 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 07-01-2016 16:30 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 07-01-2016 16:27 |
| RE: Why the greenhouse effect does not violate the first law of thermodynamics | 07-01-2016 14:32 |
| RE: Where's the infrared light that greenhouse gases shoot toward the ground? | 07-01-2016 14:30 |
| RE: University Physics textbook re the 'greenhouse' effect | 07-01-2016 14:24 |
| RE: Why would CO2 cause sea level to rise and ocean to acidify? | 07-01-2016 14:16 |
| RE: Why does greenhouse effect make Earth's surface so cool compared to what it would otherwise be? | 07-01-2016 13:39 |
| RE: Will the world (this generation) allow one man to fix things? | 07-01-2016 13:29 |
| RE: CO2 is not an issue | 06-01-2016 22:56 |
| RE: Why would CO2 cause sea level to rise and ocean to acidify? | 06-01-2016 22:28 |
| RE: Why would CO2 cause sea level to rise and ocean to acidify? | 06-01-2016 22:25 |
| RE: University Physics textbook re the 'greenhouse' effect | 06-01-2016 20:48 |
| RE: Why would CO2 cause sea level to rise and ocean to acidify? | 06-01-2016 20:42 |
| RE: Why would CO2 cause sea level to rise and ocean to acidify? | 06-01-2016 20:03 |
| RE: CO2 is not an issue | 06-01-2016 19:40 |
| RE: Why would CO2 cause sea level to rise and ocean to acidify? | 06-01-2016 18:47 |
| RE: Why would CO2 cause sea level to rise and ocean to acidify? | 06-01-2016 18:24 |
| RE: Why would CO2 cause sea level to rise and ocean to acidify? | 06-01-2016 16:12 |
| RE: CO2 is not an issue | 06-01-2016 15:55 |
| RE: Where's the infrared light that greenhouse gases shoot toward the ground? | 06-01-2016 15:02 |
| RE: CO2 blocks the Sun's incoming short wave and blocks Earth's outgoing long wave, so increasing it | 06-01-2016 14:57 |
| RE: Why would CO2 cause sea level to rise and ocean to acidify? | 06-01-2016 14:38 |
| RE: Where's the infrared light that greenhouse gases shoot toward the ground? | 06-01-2016 13:35 |
| RE: CO2 blocks the Sun's incoming short wave and blocks Earth's outgoing long wave, so increasing it | 06-01-2016 13:33 |
| RE: CO2 is not an issue | 05-01-2016 22:52 |
| RE: CO2 is not an issue | 05-01-2016 22:21 |
| RE: Why would CO2 cause sea level to rise and ocean to acidify? | 05-01-2016 20:51 |
| RE: CO2 is not an issue | 05-01-2016 20:46 |
| RE: Climate scientists don't know anything about the past. They should stop making fools of themselves. | 05-01-2016 20:14 |
| RE: CO2 is not an issue | 05-01-2016 14:11 |
| RE: Why would CO2 cause sea level to rise and ocean to acidify? | 05-01-2016 13:43 |
| RE: CO2 is not an issue | 04-01-2016 22:13 |
| RE: Why does greenhouse effect make Earth's surface so cool compared to what it would otherwise be? | 04-01-2016 20:17 |
| RE: CO2 is not an issue | 04-01-2016 20:11 |
| RE: Why would CO2 cause sea level to rise and ocean to acidify? | 04-01-2016 20:07 |
| RE: Why would CO2 cause sea level to rise and ocean to acidify? | 04-01-2016 20:02 |
| RE: CO2 is not an issue | 04-01-2016 16:31 |