Post | Date |
RE: A "challenge" for you, IB and Into | 13-10-2016 04:22 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 13-10-2016 03:57 |
RE: hurricanes during the ice age? | 13-10-2016 03:55 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 13-10-2016 03:45 |
RE: Those who argue that "CO2 isn't a pollutant, it's necessary for life" are going about i | 13-10-2016 03:22 |
RE: Reversing Climate Change with Renewable Energy Sources | 13-10-2016 03:20 |
RE: Do you really think its going to be too late to reverse the effects of climate change? | 13-10-2016 02:58 |
RE: A "challenge" for you, IB and Into | 13-10-2016 02:53 |
RE: How much money is Hillary trying to steal from the middle class about global warming? | 13-10-2016 02:45 |
RE: How much money is Hillary trying to steal from the middle class about global warming? | 13-10-2016 02:24 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 13-10-2016 00:53 |
RE: "The temperature record is unreliable!" | 13-10-2016 00:43 |
RE: "The temperature record is unreliable!" | 13-10-2016 00:40 |
RE: "The temperature record is unreliable!" | 13-10-2016 00:18 |
RE: "The temperature record is unreliable!" | 13-10-2016 00:02 |
RE: "The temperature record is unreliable!" | 13-10-2016 00:01 |
RE: "The temperature record is unreliable!" | 12-10-2016 23:33 |
RE: "The temperature record is unreliable!" | 12-10-2016 23:17 |
RE: "The temperature record is unreliable!" | 12-10-2016 23:01 |
RE: "The temperature record is unreliable!" | 12-10-2016 23:00 |
RE: "The temperature record is unreliable!" | 12-10-2016 22:59 |
RE: Those who argue that "CO2 isn't a pollutant, it's necessary for life" are going about i | 12-10-2016 22:53 |
RE: You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. | 12-10-2016 22:47 |
RE: You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. | 12-10-2016 22:43 |
RE: hurricanes during the ice age? | 12-10-2016 22:34 |
RE: hurricanes during the ice age? | 12-10-2016 22:29 |
RE: Do you really think its going to be too late to reverse the effects of climate change? | 12-10-2016 22:28 |
RE: Do you really think its going to be too late to reverse the effects of climate change? | 12-10-2016 22:10 |
RE: Do you really think its going to be too late to reverse the effects of climate change? | 12-10-2016 22:08 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 12-10-2016 22:06 |
RE: A "challenge" for you, IB and Into | 12-10-2016 21:37 |
RE: How much money is Hillary trying to steal from the middle class about global warming? | 12-10-2016 21:26 |
RE: How much money is Hillary trying to steal from the middle class about global warming? | 12-10-2016 21:24 |
RE: Is this one good enough? | 12-10-2016 21:19 |
RE: Reversing Climate Change with Renewable Energy Sources | 12-10-2016 21:16 |
RE: Hilarious Strawmen by the Deniers | 12-10-2016 20:55 |
RE: IBdaMann's Signature | 12-10-2016 20:53 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 12-10-2016 09:11 |
RE: You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. | 12-10-2016 09:11 |
RE: Is this one good enough? | 12-10-2016 09:09 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 12-10-2016 08:43 |
RE: How much money is Hillary trying to steal from the middle class about global warming? | 12-10-2016 02:01 |
RE: hurricanes during the ice age? | 12-10-2016 02:01 |
RE: "The temperature record is unreliable!" | 12-10-2016 02:00 |
RE: "The temperature record is unreliable!" | 12-10-2016 01:57 |
RE: "The temperature record is unreliable!" | 12-10-2016 01:56 |
RE: Do you really think its going to be too late to reverse the effects of climate change? | 12-10-2016 01:41 |
RE: A "challenge" for you, IB and Into | 12-10-2016 01:40 |
RE: Reversing Climate Change with Renewable Energy Sources | 12-10-2016 01:36 |
RE: You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. | 12-10-2016 01:23 |
RE: Is this one good enough? | 12-10-2016 01:22 |
RE: hurricanes during the ice age? | 12-10-2016 01:15 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 12-10-2016 01:07 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 12-10-2016 00:59 |
RE: Do you really think its going to be too late to reverse the effects of climate change? | 12-10-2016 00:45 |
RE: A "challenge" for you, IB and Into | 12-10-2016 00:44 |
RE: Reversing Climate Change with Renewable Energy Sources | 12-10-2016 00:41 |
RE: You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. | 12-10-2016 00:31 |
RE: You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. | 12-10-2016 00:30 |
RE: Is this one good enough? | 12-10-2016 00:29 |
RE: "The temperature record is unreliable!" | 12-10-2016 00:21 |
RE: "The temperature record is unreliable!" | 12-10-2016 00:20 |
RE: "The temperature record is unreliable!" | 12-10-2016 00:19 |
RE: "The temperature record is unreliable!" | 12-10-2016 00:16 |
RE: "The temperature record is unreliable!" | 12-10-2016 00:13 |
RE: "The temperature record is unreliable!" | 11-10-2016 23:52 |
RE: hurricanes during the ice age? | 11-10-2016 23:49 |
RE: hurricanes during the ice age? | 11-10-2016 23:42 |
RE: Do you really think its going to be too late to reverse the effects of climate change? | 11-10-2016 23:40 |
RE: A "challenge" for you, IB and Into | 11-10-2016 23:35 |
RE: A "challenge" for you, IB and Into | 11-10-2016 23:34 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 11-10-2016 23:31 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 11-10-2016 23:28 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 11-10-2016 23:24 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 11-10-2016 23:16 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 11-10-2016 23:09 |
RE: hurricanes during the ice age? | 11-10-2016 23:05 |
RE: hurricanes during the ice age? | 11-10-2016 22:19 |
RE: "The temperature record is unreliable!" | 11-10-2016 22:09 |
RE: "The temperature record is unreliable!" | 11-10-2016 22:08 |
RE: "The temperature record is unreliable!" | 11-10-2016 22:07 |
RE: Reversing Climate Change with Renewable Energy Sources | 11-10-2016 21:59 |
RE: Reversing Climate Change with Renewable Energy Sources | 11-10-2016 21:58 |
RE: Reversing Climate Change with Renewable Energy Sources | 11-10-2016 21:57 |
RE: Reversing Climate Change with Renewable Energy Sources | 11-10-2016 21:50 |
RE: You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. | 11-10-2016 21:39 |
RE: You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. | 11-10-2016 21:38 |
RE: A "challenge" for you, IB and Into | 11-10-2016 21:34 |
RE: Is this one good enough? | 11-10-2016 21:32 |
RE: Hilarious Strawmen by the Deniers | 11-10-2016 21:22 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 11-10-2016 11:57 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 11-10-2016 11:55 |
RE: hurricanes during the ice age? | 11-10-2016 11:54 |
RE: "The temperature record is unreliable!" | 11-10-2016 11:50 |
RE: A "challenge" for you, IB and Into | 11-10-2016 11:48 |
RE: You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. | 11-10-2016 11:46 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 11-10-2016 11:43 |
RE: Is this one good enough? | 11-10-2016 11:38 |
RE: Hilarious Strawmen by the Deniers | 11-10-2016 11:37 |
RE: Hilarious Strawmen by the Deniers | 11-10-2016 04:08 |
RE: "The temperature record is unreliable!" | 11-10-2016 04:02 |
RE: A "challenge" for you, IB and Into | 11-10-2016 04:00 |
RE: You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. | 11-10-2016 03:55 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 11-10-2016 03:51 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 11-10-2016 03:43 |
RE: hurricanes during the ice age? | 11-10-2016 03:29 |
RE: Is this one good enough? | 11-10-2016 03:24 |
RE: Is this one good enough? | 11-10-2016 03:23 |
RE: "The temperature record is unreliable!" | 11-10-2016 03:12 |
RE: A "challenge" for you, IB and Into | 11-10-2016 02:39 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 11-10-2016 02:33 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 11-10-2016 02:21 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 11-10-2016 02:10 |
RE: hurricanes during the ice age? | 11-10-2016 01:56 |
RE: Hilarious Strawmen by the Deniers | 11-10-2016 01:39 |
RE: Hilarious Strawmen by the Deniers | 11-10-2016 01:38 |
RE: Hilarious Strawmen by the Deniers | 11-10-2016 01:35 |
RE: Hilarious Strawmen by the Deniers | 11-10-2016 01:31 |
RE: What Are Trump's Opinions On Climate Change? | 11-10-2016 01:24 |
RE: IBdaMann's Signature | 11-10-2016 01:22 |
RE: IBdaMann's Signature | 11-10-2016 01:21 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 09-10-2016 23:13 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 09-10-2016 23:11 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 09-10-2016 23:09 |
RE: hurricanes during the ice age? | 09-10-2016 23:04 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 09-10-2016 23:01 |
RE: But how can Global WARMING make some places cooler? Or similarly, droughts AND torrential rains? | 09-10-2016 22:53 |
RE: Hilarious Strawmen by the Deniers | 09-10-2016 22:44 |
RE: hurricanes during the ice age? | 09-10-2016 12:42 |
RE: But how can Global WARMING make some places cooler? Or similarly, droughts AND torrential rains? | 09-10-2016 12:39 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 09-10-2016 12:28 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 09-10-2016 12:23 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 09-10-2016 11:14 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 08-10-2016 22:25 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 08-10-2016 22:23 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 08-10-2016 22:20 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 08-10-2016 22:07 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 08-10-2016 22:03 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 08-10-2016 22:01 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 08-10-2016 21:38 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 08-10-2016 21:37 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 08-10-2016 21:34 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 08-10-2016 21:31 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 08-10-2016 21:29 |
RE: What Are Trump's Opinions On Climate Change? | 08-10-2016 04:03 |
RE: Hilarious Strawmen by the Deniers | 08-10-2016 03:42 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 08-10-2016 03:28 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 08-10-2016 03:26 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 08-10-2016 03:24 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 08-10-2016 03:23 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 08-10-2016 03:22 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 08-10-2016 03:14 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 08-10-2016 03:12 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 08-10-2016 03:06 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 08-10-2016 00:48 |
RE: Hilarious Strawmen by the Deniers | 08-10-2016 00:43 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 08-10-2016 00:23 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 08-10-2016 00:22 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 08-10-2016 00:21 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 08-10-2016 00:20 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 08-10-2016 00:19 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 08-10-2016 00:18 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 08-10-2016 00:12 |
RE: Hilarious Strawmen by the Deniers | 08-10-2016 00:10 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 07-10-2016 21:43 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 07-10-2016 21:42 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 07-10-2016 21:41 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 07-10-2016 21:39 |
RE: Hilarious Strawmen by the Deniers | 07-10-2016 21:29 |
RE: Hilarious Strawmen by the Deniers | 07-10-2016 02:47 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 06-10-2016 23:32 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 06-10-2016 23:12 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 06-10-2016 23:09 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 06-10-2016 23:07 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 06-10-2016 22:38 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 06-10-2016 22:34 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 06-10-2016 07:46 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 06-10-2016 07:37 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 06-10-2016 03:25 |
RE: Global Warming: Weak in Argument but Strong in Faith | 06-10-2016 03:23 |
RE: whats warming the world | 06-10-2016 02:51 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 06-10-2016 02:43 |
RE: whats warming the world | 06-10-2016 00:16 |
RE: So how exactly does this Evil Liberal Governmental Science Conspiracy do... anything? | 06-10-2016 00:07 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 06-10-2016 00:06 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 05-10-2016 22:40 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 05-10-2016 22:40 |
RE: So how exactly does this Evil Liberal Governmental Science Conspiracy do... anything? | 05-10-2016 22:36 |
RE: whats warming the world | 05-10-2016 22:33 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 05-10-2016 22:26 |
RE: So how exactly does this Evil Liberal Governmental Science Conspiracy do... anything? | 05-10-2016 03:03 |
RE: So how exactly does this Evil Liberal Governmental Science Conspiracy do... anything? | 05-10-2016 01:36 |
RE: I have a theory | 05-10-2016 01:24 |
RE: Let's Revisit Earth's Ice Accumulation | 05-10-2016 01:21 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 05-10-2016 01:17 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 05-10-2016 01:14 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 05-10-2016 01:10 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 05-10-2016 01:08 |
RE: So how exactly does this Evil Liberal Governmental Science Conspiracy do... anything? | 05-10-2016 01:04 |
RE: I have a theory | 05-10-2016 01:01 |
RE: What is heat? | 05-10-2016 00:59 |
RE: What is heat? | 05-10-2016 00:53 |
RE: What is heat? | 05-10-2016 00:47 |
RE: What is heat? | 05-10-2016 00:39 |
RE: What is heat? | 05-10-2016 00:20 |
RE: Let's Revisit Earth's Ice Accumulation | 05-10-2016 00:14 |
RE: So how exactly does this Evil Liberal Governmental Science Conspiracy do... anything? | 04-10-2016 23:52 |
RE: What is heat? | 04-10-2016 23:42 |
RE: What is heat? | 04-10-2016 23:39 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 04-10-2016 23:35 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 04-10-2016 23:34 |
RE: What is heat? | 04-10-2016 04:32 |
RE: What is heat? | 04-10-2016 04:31 |
RE: Let's Revisit Earth's Ice Accumulation | 04-10-2016 04:30 |
RE: Let's Revisit Earth's Ice Accumulation | 04-10-2016 04:30 |
RE: So how exactly does this Evil Liberal Governmental Science Conspiracy do... anything? | 04-10-2016 04:29 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 04-10-2016 04:25 |
RE: greenies are going about it the wrong way | 04-10-2016 04:02 |
RE: What is heat? | 04-10-2016 03:52 |
RE: Let's Revisit Earth's Ice Accumulation | 04-10-2016 03:51 |
RE: What is heat? | 04-10-2016 03:45 |
RE: What is heat? | 04-10-2016 03:40 |
RE: What is heat? | 04-10-2016 03:40 |
RE: So how exactly does this Evil Liberal Governmental Science Conspiracy do... anything? | 04-10-2016 03:36 |
RE: greenies are going about it the wrong way | 04-10-2016 03:34 |
RE: Let's Revisit Earth's Ice Accumulation | 04-10-2016 03:34 |
RE: Let's Revisit Earth's Ice Accumulation | 04-10-2016 03:32 |
RE: Let's Revisit Earth's Ice Accumulation | 04-10-2016 03:31 |
RE: Let's Revisit Earth's Ice Accumulation | 04-10-2016 03:28 |
RE: Let's Revisit Earth's Ice Accumulation | 04-10-2016 03:26 |
RE: Let's Revisit Earth's Ice Accumulation | 04-10-2016 03:26 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 04-10-2016 03:09 |
RE: So how exactly does this Evil Liberal Governmental Science Conspiracy do... anything? | 04-10-2016 01:42 |
RE: What is heat? | 04-10-2016 01:41 |
RE: Let's Revisit Earth's Ice Accumulation | 04-10-2016 00:49 |
RE: Let's Revisit Earth's Ice Accumulation | 04-10-2016 00:46 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 04-10-2016 00:21 |
RE: So how exactly does this Evil Liberal Governmental Science Conspiracy do... anything? | 04-10-2016 00:19 |
RE: What is heat? | 03-10-2016 23:58 |
RE: What is heat? | 03-10-2016 21:37 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 03-10-2016 21:36 |
RE: So how exactly does this Evil Liberal Governmental Science Conspiracy do... anything? | 03-10-2016 21:34 |
RE: greenies are going about it the wrong way | 03-10-2016 21:29 |
RE: greenies are going about it the wrong way | 03-10-2016 21:24 |
RE: Let's Revisit Earth's Ice Accumulation | 03-10-2016 21:15 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 03-10-2016 21:06 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 03-10-2016 21:05 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 03-10-2016 21:04 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 03-10-2016 21:02 |
RE: So how exactly does this Evil Liberal Governmental Science Conspiracy do... anything? | 03-10-2016 20:58 |
RE: Hilarious Strawmen by the Deniers | 03-10-2016 20:55 |
RE: Hilarious Strawmen by the Deniers | 03-10-2016 20:48 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 02-10-2016 23:04 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 02-10-2016 21:49 |
RE: What is heat? | 02-10-2016 21:45 |
RE: whats warming the world | 02-10-2016 21:40 |
RE: So how exactly does this Evil Liberal Governmental Science Conspiracy do... anything? | 02-10-2016 21:30 |
RE: Let's Revisit Earth's Ice Accumulation | 02-10-2016 21:20 |
RE: I have a theory | 02-10-2016 21:16 |
RE: I have a theory | 02-10-2016 21:14 |
RE: What is heat? | 02-10-2016 21:10 |
RE: What is heat? | 02-10-2016 21:09 |
RE: What is heat? | 02-10-2016 21:07 |
RE: whats warming the world | 02-10-2016 21:04 |
RE: Hilarious Strawmen by the Deniers | 02-10-2016 20:58 |
RE: So how exactly does this Evil Liberal Governmental Science Conspiracy do... anything? | 01-10-2016 23:40 |
RE: whats warming the world | 01-10-2016 23:38 |
RE: So how exactly does this Evil Liberal Governmental Science Conspiracy do... anything? | 01-10-2016 23:24 |
RE: What is heat? | 01-10-2016 23:19 |
RE: What is heat? | 01-10-2016 23:04 |
RE: What is heat? | 01-10-2016 23:02 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 01-10-2016 23:00 |
RE: Let's Revisit Earth's Ice Accumulation | 30-09-2016 23:22 |
RE: What is heat? | 30-09-2016 23:19 |
RE: Let's Revisit Earth's Ice Accumulation | 30-09-2016 23:09 |
RE: Let's Revisit Earth's Ice Accumulation | 30-09-2016 23:06 |
RE: whats warming the world | 30-09-2016 23:04 |
RE: So how exactly does this Evil Liberal Governmental Science Conspiracy do... anything? | 30-09-2016 23:01 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 30-09-2016 22:54 |
RE: What is heat? | 30-09-2016 21:34 |
RE: What is heat? | 30-09-2016 21:32 |
RE: What is heat? | 30-09-2016 21:29 |
RE: the world passes 400ppm for the last time | 30-09-2016 21:26 |
RE: whats warming the world | 30-09-2016 21:22 |
RE: Let's Revisit Earth's Ice Accumulation | 30-09-2016 21:17 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 30-09-2016 21:12 |
RE: So how exactly does this Evil Liberal Governmental Science Conspiracy do... anything? | 30-09-2016 21:11 |
RE: So how exactly does this Evil Liberal Governmental Science Conspiracy do... anything? | 30-09-2016 20:51 |
RE: What is heat? | 30-09-2016 20:41 |
RE: What is heat? | 30-09-2016 20:37 |
RE: Let's Revisit Earth's Ice Accumulation | 30-09-2016 20:34 |
RE: Let's Revisit Earth's Ice Accumulation | 30-09-2016 20:29 |
RE: Let's Revisit Earth's Ice Accumulation | 30-09-2016 20:25 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 30-09-2016 20:23 |
RE: whats warming the world | 30-09-2016 20:22 |
RE: So how exactly does this Evil Liberal Governmental Science Conspiracy do... anything? | 30-09-2016 20:19 |
RE: What is heat? | 30-09-2016 09:40 |
RE: So how exactly does this Evil Liberal Governmental Science Conspiracy do... anything? | 30-09-2016 09:38 |
RE: whats warming the world | 29-09-2016 22:51 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 29-09-2016 22:34 |
RE: the world passes 400ppm for the last time | 29-09-2016 22:30 |
RE: What is heat? | 29-09-2016 21:43 |
RE: Just For A Laugh (The Dogma Quiz) | 29-09-2016 21:33 |
RE: Let's Revisit Earth's Ice Accumulation | 29-09-2016 21:18 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 29-09-2016 21:13 |
RE: the world passes 400ppm for the last time | 29-09-2016 21:01 |
RE: whats warming the world | 29-09-2016 03:15 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 29-09-2016 02:49 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 29-09-2016 02:44 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 29-09-2016 02:31 |
RE: whats warming the world | 29-09-2016 02:13 |
RE: the world passes 400ppm for the last time | 28-09-2016 23:19 |
RE: whats warming the world | 28-09-2016 22:58 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 28-09-2016 22:55 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 28-09-2016 22:15 |
RE: the world passes 400ppm for the last time | 28-09-2016 21:24 |
RE: Realclimate and the silliest arguments of climate deniers | 28-09-2016 21:23 |
RE: whats warming the world | 28-09-2016 21:21 |
RE: Let's Revisit Earth's Ice Accumulation | 28-09-2016 21:19 |
RE: the world passes 400ppm for the last time | 28-09-2016 21:15 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 28-09-2016 21:11 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 28-09-2016 03:15 |
RE: Argumentum ex fitque | 28-09-2016 03:13 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 28-09-2016 01:07 |
RE: Argumentum ex fitque | 28-09-2016 01:02 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 28-09-2016 00:34 |
RE: Argumentum ex fitque | 28-09-2016 00:32 |
RE: What Are Trump's Opinions On Climate Change? | 27-09-2016 23:18 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 27-09-2016 23:16 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 27-09-2016 23:15 |
RE: Realclimate and the silliest arguments of climate deniers | 27-09-2016 22:38 |
RE: Argumentum ex fitque | 27-09-2016 22:34 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 27-09-2016 22:19 |
RE: What Are Trump's Opinions On Climate Change? | 27-09-2016 22:18 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 27-09-2016 21:52 |
RE: What Are Trump's Opinions On Climate Change? | 27-09-2016 21:41 |
RE: Realclimate and the silliest arguments of climate deniers | 27-09-2016 21:32 |
RE: Argumentum ex fitque | 27-09-2016 21:26 |
RE: Argumentum ex fitque | 27-09-2016 02:03 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 27-09-2016 01:58 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 27-09-2016 01:55 |
RE: Argumentum ex fitque | 27-09-2016 01:31 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 27-09-2016 01:12 |
RE: Argumentum ex fitque | 26-09-2016 23:37 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 26-09-2016 23:15 |
RE: Argumentum ex fitque | 26-09-2016 21:49 |
RE: Realclimate and the silliest arguments of climate deniers | 26-09-2016 21:38 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 26-09-2016 21:03 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 26-09-2016 20:46 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 26-09-2016 20:39 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 26-09-2016 20:36 |
RE: Argumentum ex fitque | 26-09-2016 20:28 |
RE: When we measure temperature, we don't measure the ground temperature, we measure the air | 26-09-2016 20:20 |
RE: When we measure temperature, we don't measure the ground temperature, we measure the air | 25-09-2016 22:14 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 25-09-2016 22:07 |
RE: I'm not quite so sure, though | 25-09-2016 21:40 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 25-09-2016 21:30 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 25-09-2016 09:55 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 25-09-2016 09:53 |
RE: You have no proof an atmosphere of 100% oxygen is not as effective as the current atmosphere in trapping | 25-09-2016 09:46 |
RE: CO2 increased 44% since 1850. No effect on temperature. Experimental result | 24-09-2016 21:01 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 24-09-2016 20:58 |
RE: Fallacy Fallacy | 24-09-2016 20:15 |
RE: there is no average Earth temperature | 24-09-2016 20:14 |
RE: Basic arithmetic | 24-09-2016 11:43 |
RE: Climate change, how it is viewed through social media | 24-09-2016 11:41 |
RE: Fallacy Fallacy | 24-09-2016 11:32 |
RE: there is no average Earth temperature | 24-09-2016 11:14 |
RE: You have no proof an atmosphere of 100% oxygen is not as effective as the current atmosphere in trapping | 24-09-2016 11:12 |
RE: You have no proof an atmosphere of 100% oxygen is not as effective as the current atmosphere in trapping | 24-09-2016 11:04 |
RE: What is this Church of Marxism? | 24-09-2016 10:33 |
RE: Various other environmental concerns | 24-09-2016 07:30 |
RE: Basic arithmetic | 24-09-2016 06:53 |
RE: Read this and think | 24-09-2016 06:26 |
RE: You have no proof an atmosphere of 100% oxygen is not as effective as the current atmosphere in trapping | 24-09-2016 06:16 |
RE: there is no average Earth temperature | 24-09-2016 05:49 |
RE: Climate change, how it is viewed through social media | 24-09-2016 05:30 |
RE: Climate change, how it is viewed through social media | 24-09-2016 05:30 |
RE: Fallacy Fallacy | 24-09-2016 05:26 |
RE: Fallacy Fallacy | 24-09-2016 04:37 |
RE: Basic arithmetic | 24-09-2016 04:33 |
RE: Read this and think | 24-09-2016 04:31 |
RE: the atmosphere is has enough density to trap heat by conduction | 24-09-2016 04:18 |
RE: the atmosphere is has enough density to trap heat by conduction | 24-09-2016 04:15 |
RE: the atmosphere is has enough density to trap heat by conduction | 24-09-2016 04:13 |
RE: the atmosphere is has enough density to trap heat by conduction | 24-09-2016 04:12 |
RE: the atmosphere is has enough density to trap heat by conduction | 24-09-2016 04:09 |
RE: the atmosphere is has enough density to trap heat by conduction | 24-09-2016 04:05 |
RE: 33 degrees C | 24-09-2016 00:46 |
RE: Climate change, how it is viewed through social media | 23-09-2016 23:49 |
RE: I've been having some doubts | 23-09-2016 23:44 |
RE: the atmosphere is has enough density to trap heat by conduction | 23-09-2016 23:08 |
RE: I've been having some doubts | 23-09-2016 22:40 |
RE: Climate change, how it is viewed through social media | 23-09-2016 22:24 |
RE: Climate change, how it is viewed through social media | 23-09-2016 22:21 |
RE: the atmosphere is has enough density to trap heat by conduction | 23-09-2016 22:16 |
RE: Clarification | 23-09-2016 21:52 |
RE: Climate change, how it is viewed through social media | 23-09-2016 21:44 |
RE: the atmosphere is a blanket, traps heat | 23-09-2016 21:43 |
RE: Clarification | 23-09-2016 21:33 |
RE: Climate change, how it is viewed through social media | 23-09-2016 21:19 |
RE: Read this and think | 23-09-2016 21:14 |
RE: Basic arithmetic | 23-09-2016 21:02 |
RE: Climate change, how it is viewed through social media | 23-09-2016 20:55 |
RE: Climate change, how it is viewed through social media | 23-09-2016 20:52 |
RE: Climate change, how it is viewed through social media | 23-09-2016 20:51 |
RE: Climate change, how it is viewed through social media | 23-09-2016 20:49 |
RE: Climate change, how it is viewed through social media | 23-09-2016 20:48 |
RE: Fallacy Fallacy | 23-09-2016 20:38 |
RE: the atmosphere is a blanket, traps heat | 23-09-2016 20:28 |
RE: the atmosphere is a blanket, traps heat | 23-09-2016 20:13 |
RE: the atmosphere is a blanket, traps heat | 23-09-2016 20:11 |
RE: Is GW religious? | 23-09-2016 20:08 |
RE: Clarification | 23-09-2016 20:06 |
RE: Humans are part of nature. Everything humans do is God's will. | 23-09-2016 20:04 |
RE: 33 degrees C | 23-09-2016 20:02 |
RE: the atmosphere is has enough density to trap heat by conduction | 23-09-2016 20:00 |
RE: Climate change, how it is viewed through social media | 23-09-2016 09:18 |
RE: Basic arithmetic | 23-09-2016 09:11 |
RE: Clarification | 23-09-2016 09:06 |
RE: Fallacy Fallacy | 23-09-2016 08:59 |
RE: Clarification | 23-09-2016 04:01 |
RE: Fallacy Fallacy | 23-09-2016 03:59 |
RE: Fallacy Fallacy | 23-09-2016 01:45 |
RE: Clarification | 23-09-2016 01:39 |
RE: 33 degrees C | 23-09-2016 01:32 |
RE: there is no average Earth temperature | 23-09-2016 01:27 |
RE: Basic arithmetic | 23-09-2016 01:22 |
RE: there is no average Earth temperature | 23-09-2016 00:13 |
RE: Clarification | 23-09-2016 00:06 |
RE: Basic arithmetic | 23-09-2016 00:01 |
RE: Read this and think | 22-09-2016 23:46 |
RE: 33 degrees C | 22-09-2016 23:36 |
RE: Clarification | 22-09-2016 23:06 |
RE: Basic arithmetic | 22-09-2016 22:49 |
RE: Basic arithmetic | 22-09-2016 22:48 |
RE: Basic arithmetic | 22-09-2016 21:32 |
RE: Read this and think | 22-09-2016 21:27 |
RE: the atmosphere is has enough density to trap heat by conduction | 22-09-2016 21:20 |
RE: the atmosphere is has enough density to trap heat by conduction | 22-09-2016 21:17 |
RE: Clarification | 22-09-2016 13:00 |
RE: 33 degrees C | 22-09-2016 12:42 |
RE: Is GW religious? | 22-09-2016 12:41 |
RE: the atmosphere is has enough density to trap heat by conduction | 22-09-2016 12:31 |
RE: Basic arithmetic | 22-09-2016 11:56 |
RE: Basic arithmetic | 22-09-2016 11:50 |
RE: Basic arithmetic | 22-09-2016 11:37 |
RE: there is no average Earth temperature | 22-09-2016 11:32 |
RE: Argumentum ex fitque | 22-09-2016 11:24 |
RE: Read this and think | 22-09-2016 02:12 |
RE: there is no average Earth temperature | 22-09-2016 01:31 |
RE: there is no average Earth temperature | 22-09-2016 01:29 |
RE: there is no average Earth temperature | 22-09-2016 01:19 |
RE: Read this and think | 22-09-2016 01:12 |
RE: the atmosphere is has enough density to trap heat by conduction | 22-09-2016 00:39 |
RE: Is GW religious? | 22-09-2016 00:38 |
RE: the atmosphere is has enough density to trap heat by conduction | 22-09-2016 00:24 |
RE: Let's Get Back On Track | 22-09-2016 00:23 |
RE: Read this and think | 22-09-2016 00:21 |
RE: Is GW religious? | 22-09-2016 00:17 |
RE: Basic arithmetic | 22-09-2016 00:12 |
RE: 33 degrees C | 22-09-2016 00:02 |
RE: Is GW religious? | 21-09-2016 23:56 |
RE: Clarification | 21-09-2016 23:46 |
RE: the atmosphere is has enough density to trap heat by conduction | 21-09-2016 23:44 |
RE: Let's Get Back On Track | 21-09-2016 23:43 |
RE: Read this and think | 21-09-2016 23:41 |
RE: Read this and think | 21-09-2016 21:08 |
RE: Read this and think | 21-09-2016 21:01 |
RE: Basic arithmetic | 21-09-2016 20:51 |
RE: the atmosphere is has enough density to trap heat by conduction | 21-09-2016 20:45 |
RE: Let's Get Back On Track | 21-09-2016 20:41 |
RE: Let's Get Back On Track | 21-09-2016 20:35 |
RE: Is this one good enough? | 21-09-2016 09:58 |
RE: Basic arithmetic | 21-09-2016 09:40 |
RE: Is GW religious? | 21-09-2016 09:30 |
RE: Clarification | 21-09-2016 03:56 |
RE: Is GW religious? | 21-09-2016 03:25 |
RE: Basic arithmetic | 21-09-2016 03:03 |
RE: Is this one good enough? | 21-09-2016 02:58 |
RE: The First Law of Thermodynamics | 21-09-2016 02:49 |
RE: The First Law of Thermodynamics | 21-09-2016 02:44 |
RE: Basic arithmetic | 21-09-2016 02:22 |
RE: Let's Get Back On Track | 21-09-2016 01:59 |
RE: Is this one good enough? | 21-09-2016 01:16 |
RE: Fallacy Fallacy | 21-09-2016 01:13 |
RE: Is this one good enough? | 20-09-2016 23:35 |
RE: The First Law of Thermodynamics | 20-09-2016 23:31 |
RE: Basic arithmetic | 20-09-2016 23:28 |
RE: Basic arithmetic | 20-09-2016 23:17 |
RE: Is this one good enough? | 20-09-2016 22:56 |
RE: Fallacy Fallacy | 20-09-2016 22:54 |
RE: Is GW religious? | 20-09-2016 22:09 |
RE: Is this one good enough? | 20-09-2016 21:13 |
RE: Fallacy Fallacy | 20-09-2016 21:08 |
RE: Fallacy Fallacy | 20-09-2016 20:56 |
RE: Fallacy Fallacy | 20-09-2016 20:56 |
RE: Fallacy Fallacy | 20-09-2016 20:53 |
RE: Basic arithmetic | 20-09-2016 20:50 |
RE: Basic arithmetic | 20-09-2016 20:48 |