upper atmosphere temp

keepit wrote:
I wonder if anyone believes your trash talk ibd. It would be pretty disappointing if they did.

keepit wrote:I wonder if anyone believes your trash talk ibd. It would be pretty disappointing if they did.

IBdaMann wrote:

keepit wrote: There is galaxy rotation parameters which don't make sense without postulating an additional gravitational source to augment gravity.

You're full of baloney, keepit. It doesn't matter what you postulate, you can't understand it. If you could understand it, you'd understand that there isn't any "dark matter."

You're just playing semantics, keepit.

keepit wrote: There are a minority of galaxies where the dark matte scenario doesn't make sense though.

Incorrect. Your statement presumes that there are some things that make sense to you, and we both know that is not true.

keepit wrote: Some cosmologists have postulated a modified theory of gravity to explain the rotations but their theories don't work with all galaxies.

... because they are greatly mistaken.

keepit wrote: Still, the dark mater hypothesis helps explain galaxy rotations and galaxy formation (which supposedly wouldn't have occurred without help from additional gravity).

Nope. Dark matter does not help explain anything in any way. You know this, which is why you didn't list any examples, i.e. there aren't any examples.

keepit wrote: It is a strange form of matter which is difficult to study.

... yet it doesn't prevent you from pretending to be a genius on the subject.

You owe everyone on this board an apology for the bandwidth that you wasted.

keepit wrote:I wonder if anyone believes your trash talk ibd.

Swan wrote:
Funny ...

keepit wrote:
There is evidence for dark matter. There is galaxy rotation parameters which don't make sense without postulating an additional gravitational source to augment gravity. There are a minority of galaxies where the dark matter scenario doesn't make sense though. Some cosmologists have postulated a modified theory of gravity to explain the rotations but their theories don't work with all galaxies. Still, the dark mater hypothesis helps explain galaxy rotations and galaxy formation (which supposedly wouldn't have occurred without help from additional gravity). It is a strange form of matter which is difficult to study.
Additional evidence for dark matter is gravitational lensing.

James_ wrote:

keepit wrote:
There is evidence for dark matter. There is galaxy rotation parameters which don't make sense without postulating an additional gravitational source to augment gravity. There are a minority of galaxies where the dark matter scenario doesn't make sense though. Some cosmologists have postulated a modified theory of gravity to explain the rotations but their theories don't work with all galaxies. Still, the dark mater hypothesis helps explain galaxy rotations and galaxy formation (which supposedly wouldn't have occurred without help from additional gravity). It is a strange form of matter which is difficult to study.
Additional evidence for dark matter is gravitational lensing.

C'mon man, Pleeeaaassseee give me a break. Are you telling me that the rotational velocity of a galaxy like the Milky Way galaxy is slowed because
space isn't empty?
Look friend, we're not discussing most of the people in here, okay? I mean they're dense and now you're telling me that space has density as well?

I really can't believe this. You're saying that the "arms" of the Milky Way galaxy
rotate according to f = ma because of resistance? I can't believe that you are suggesting that the spirals of the Milky Way galaxy are caused by resistance slowing the outer "arms" of the spiral. I say "balderdash" old chap, Bolderdash.

keepit wrote:You're a puke ibd.

quote]IBdaMann wrote:

Xadoman wrote: Gases do not self compress.

Of course gases don't self-compress, but gravity compresses them extremely effectively. Have you ever heard of "atmospheric pressure"?

keepit wrote:
James,
I don't think it's slowed. I think that rather than flying apart at the velocity it has. it keeps that velocity because of the extra gravity afforded by the dark matter. The theory has many proponents but also some "antagonists". I wish i understood it better. For example the DM exists at the perimeter of the galaxy and this location keeps the galaxy together. It seems counterintuitive but summing it up it makes sense, i think.

Xadoman wrote:Earth is not a gas molecule. Falce equivalency fallacy.

IBdaMann wrote:

Xadoman wrote:Earth is not a gas molecule. Falce equivalency fallacy.

Gas molecules are not "made it" cars. Falce equivalency fallacy.

Xadoman wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Xadoman wrote:Earth is not a gas molecule. Falce equivalency fallacy.

Gas molecules are not "made it" cars. Falce equivalency fallacy.

Irrelevance fallacy. Self compressing gases do not exist. Gases can not do work on themselves. This is a violation of thermodynamics.

Xadoman wrote:Irrelevance fallacy. Self compressing gases do not exist.

Xadoman wrote:Gases can not do work on themselves. This is a violation of thermodynamics.

keepit wrote:
You're a puke ibd.

GasGuzzler wrote:

keepit wrote:
You're a puke ibd.

Well now I'm pissed off. IBdaMann did work harder for it, but I wanted to be the puke.

If I were able to earn your puke recognition, would this ultimately increase the number of pukes?

GasGuzzler wrote:If I were able to earn your puke recognition, would this ultimately increase the number of pukes?

keepit wrote: The dollar index is much higher than usual right now and the Japanese and Chinese don't seem so eager to buy our treasuries these days.

keepit wrote: Would this be a good time for the us to print up some dollars and buy those low interest treasuries back and wait for interest rates to go down a bit?

IBdaMann wrote:

keepit wrote: The dollar index is much higher than usual right now and the Japanese and Chinese don't seem so eager to buy our treasuries these days.

1. The US only has one Treasury and it is not for sale.
2. Japanese and Chinese people all over the world continue to buy US bonds.
3. If there are governments that are not buying US bonds, they have my appreciation.

keepit wrote: Would this be a good time for the us to print up some dollars and buy those low interest treasuries back and wait for interest rates to go down a bit?

No. It is time for the government to learn financial discipline and to stop spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending, spending spending, spending, spending, spending like a drunken sailor on payday.

IBdaMann wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:If I were able to earn your puke recognition, would this ultimately increase the number of pukes?

GasGuzzler, when you filled out the paperwork, did you check the box indicating that you have debt? I think that all pukes created that have debt do not increase the number of pukes, even if you get your own serial number.

IBdaMann wrote:
If memory serves, both Frank and Sven are not counted amongst pukes today specifically by becoming pukes that are used to paying off debt.

IBdaMann wrote:
In my case, you can tell by my trash talk that I'm in junk bond status. I've hit on some very dark matter times in which it is hard to find the dark energy to even get out of bed. You know times are getting very dark matter by the gravity of the situation being greater than it otherwise should be and worse than previously feared.

IBdaMann wrote:
Good luck on not increasing the number of pukes.

keepit wrote:
Hmm, speaking of dollars and debt: The dollar index is much higher than usual right now and the Japanese and Chinese don't seem so eager to buy our treasuries these days. They bought a lot of debt from us at much lower interest rates than the current ones which means that those treasuries are worth much less right now than when they bought them. Would this be a good time for the us to print up some dollars and buy those low interest treasuries back and wait for interest rates to go down a bit?

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:Is the red shift (lengthening of light waves, galaxy shapes appearing dimmer)

Red shift doesn't affect light intensity. It affects the color. Whatever color the light would normally be, because of the movement away, the light waves are lengthened and thus the frequency is reduced. This has the effect of "shifting" the color towards red. The greater the velocity, the greater the shift towards red; this is how one can tell the relative velocity that a body is moving away from earth.

So, when you are moving, shift happens.

The amplitude, however, does not change; therefore brightness does not change.

IBdaMann wrote:

Xadoman wrote:Irrelevance fallacy. Self compressing gases do not exist.

Irrelevance fallacy. Gravity certainly does exist.

Xadoman wrote:Gases can not do work on themselves. This is a violation of thermodynamics.

Irrelevance fallacy. Every gas molecule has mass. Any two gas molecules have gravity. You lose on this one.

Xadoman wrote:So two gas molecules meet in the space and start bouncing back and forth because gravity holds them together.

Xadoman wrote: Do you know that in space you need to be tethered to the space station?

Xadoman wrote: Gravity would not save you my friend.

Xadoman wrote:Gravitational collapse of gases does not make sense my friends.

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:Is the red shift (lengthening of light waves, galaxy shapes appearing dimmer)

Red shift doesn't affect light intensity. It affects the color. Whatever color the light would normally be, because of the movement away, the light waves are lengthened and thus the frequency is reduced. This has the effect of "shifting" the color towards red. The greater the velocity, the greater the shift towards red; this is how one can tell the relative velocity that a body is moving away from earth.

So, when you are moving, shift happens.

The amplitude, however, does not change; therefore brightness does not change.

I see. Anyhow, I think we can attribute the red shift to an atmospheric effect. Probably has something to do with more CO2 in the atmosphere. Makes Heaven's glass a bit more opaque.

No need for 1929 theories of infinite expansion.

Galaxies of course being a projection of light onto the glass from outer space.

For James, they look gassy. Lots of gas particles colliding.

James_ wrote: Sometimes I wonder why economists can't do simple math.

James_ wrote: The numbers I use are as an example, it allows for modeling.

James_ wrote: If America's GDP is $21 Trillion and the Trade Deficit is 6% then each year the U.S. economy would shrink by $1.26 Trillion.

IBdaMann wrote:

James_ wrote: Sometimes I wonder why economists can't do simple math.

... because they aren't economists; they only claim to be. They are typically leftists on the DNC payroll who recite the Democrat party line and say that it must be true because they claim to be "economists" ... just as some people preaching Global Warming and Climate Change sternly assert that what they say must be true because they claim to be "geologists." Leftists, being leftists, hence being locked into the mode of having others do their thinking for them and being too stupid or uneducated to call booooolsch't when they should, simply believe everything they are told to believe, to include the stupid justifications for why they believe what they believe.

James_ wrote: The numbers I use are as an example, it allows for modeling.

If you have already selected in advance only those numbers that allow for modeling, your answers will differ from any results you would have gotten had you used the correct numbers.

James_ wrote: If America's GDP is $21 Trillion and the Trade Deficit is 6% then each year the U.S. economy would shrink by $1.26 Trillion.

Nope. The economy would grow by $1.26 Trillion.

Of course, it would add $1.26 Trillion to the growing bubble, and would exacerbate the problems generated by the bursting of that bubble to that extent when it occurs.

James_ wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:Is the red shift (lengthening of light waves, galaxy shapes appearing dimmer)

Red shift doesn't affect light intensity. It affects the color. Whatever color the light would normally be, because of the movement away, the light waves are lengthened and thus the frequency is reduced. This has the effect of "shifting" the color towards red. The greater the velocity, the greater the shift towards red; this is how one can tell the relative velocity that a body is moving away from earth.

So, when you are moving, shift happens.

The amplitude, however, does not change; therefore brightness does not change.

I see. Anyhow, I think we can attribute the red shift to an atmospheric effect. Probably has something to do with more CO2 in the atmosphere. Makes Heaven's glass a bit more opaque.

No need for 1929 theories of infinite expansion.

Galaxies of course being a projection of light onto the glass from outer space.

For James, they look gassy. Lots of gas particles colliding.

Particles colliding is the scientific basis for cold fusion https://www.iter.org/.
What they've overlooked is that the Sun has gravity and the energy in the inner part of the solar system comes from the Sun. They haven't quite replicated the parameters
of fusion in the Sun's corona. They've only replicated the corona.
With red shift, the Sun's gravitational field coupled with the Earth's might explain it.
This kind of gets into astrophysics because of how space is stretched around the Sun and the Earth.
Also, while gravity can explain why galaxies collide https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2022/08/galaxy-mergers-colliding-cosmic-matter-milky-way-andromeda/671164/, aren't they supposed to be moving further apart?
Also, if you notice how many Suns those 2 galaxies have? It's a clear enough image to where they could probably be counted. One person on Facebook who showed the first picture he took as he was pursuing a PhD in astrophysics, I mentioned look at all of those galaxies in the background behind 2 galaxies that looked similar to the 2 in the link. He didn't consider that if a galaxy is far enough away it might look like a star.
They use software to establish what's a star and what's a galaxy. He didn't understand that with a star, it's light will show what gasses are in its atmosphere/corona.

Spongy Iris wrote:

James_ wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:Is the red shift (lengthening of light waves, galaxy shapes appearing dimmer)

Red shift doesn't affect light intensity. It affects the color. Whatever color the light would normally be, because of the movement away, the light waves are lengthened and thus the frequency is reduced. This has the effect of "shifting" the color towards red. The greater the velocity, the greater the shift towards red; this is how one can tell the relative velocity that a body is moving away from earth.

So, when you are moving, shift happens.

The amplitude, however, does not change; therefore brightness does not change.

I see. Anyhow, I think we can attribute the red shift to an atmospheric effect. Probably has something to do with more CO2 in the atmosphere. Makes Heaven's glass a bit more opaque.

No need for 1929 theories of infinite expansion.

Galaxies of course being a projection of light onto the glass from outer space.

For James, they look gassy. Lots of gas particles colliding.

Particles colliding is the scientific basis for cold fusion https://www.iter.org/.
What they've overlooked is that the Sun has gravity and the energy in the inner part of the solar system comes from the Sun. They haven't quite replicated the parameters
of fusion in the Sun's corona. They've only replicated the corona.
With red shift, the Sun's gravitational field coupled with the Earth's might explain it.
This kind of gets into astrophysics because of how space is stretched around the Sun and the Earth.
Also, while gravity can explain why galaxies collide https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2022/08/galaxy-mergers-colliding-cosmic-matter-milky-way-andromeda/671164/, aren't they supposed to be moving further apart?
Also, if you notice how many Suns those 2 galaxies have? It's a clear enough image to where they could probably be counted. One person on Facebook who showed the first picture he took as he was pursuing a PhD in astrophysics, I mentioned look at all of those galaxies in the background behind 2 galaxies that looked similar to the 2 in the link. He didn't consider that if a galaxy is far enough away it might look like a star.
They use software to establish what's a star and what's a galaxy. He didn't understand that with a star, it's light will show what gasses are in its atmosphere/corona.

It may take me a while to digest all of the subject matter in your comment James.

But let me just say that I am a big believer in cold fusion. I think an example of basic materials needed:

container of heavy water and lithium salts
Palladium strip
Platinum coils
Deuterium
Oxygen
A way to apply voltage to container

Though the scientific consensus is saying the simple steps in the cold fusion experiment described by Pons and Fleischmann can't be repeated, Pons says the container for the experiment should undergo 20 days of electrolytic conditioning, and heat to boiling for the first run. I think the voltage needs to be applied with an oscillating intensity too. One may argue semantics, that this doesn't qualify as "cold" fusion, but who cares.

The primary goal of cold fusion would be to generate gamma radiation.

I believe:

A more complex cold fusion, with Earth being the container undergoing collisions from gravity, is what powers the Moon. The Moon would therefore be the most powerful spot of radiation in space. It powers the Sun.

But one need not think cosmically to imagine natural processes applying cold fusion.

Horny devils are also generating gamma radiation every time they have an orgasm. I think you know, that's why it's called the Blue Flame Club

You have officially triggered me to go on this rant James

James_ wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

James_ wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:Is the red shift (lengthening of light waves, galaxy shapes appearing dimmer)

Red shift doesn't affect light intensity. It affects the color. Whatever color the light would normally be, because of the movement away, the light waves are lengthened and thus the frequency is reduced. This has the effect of "shifting" the color towards red. The greater the velocity, the greater the shift towards red; this is how one can tell the relative velocity that a body is moving away from earth.

So, when you are moving, shift happens.

The amplitude, however, does not change; therefore brightness does not change.

I see. Anyhow, I think we can attribute the red shift to an atmospheric effect. Probably has something to do with more CO2 in the atmosphere. Makes Heaven's glass a bit more opaque.

No need for 1929 theories of infinite expansion.

Galaxies of course being a projection of light onto the glass from outer space.

For James, they look gassy. Lots of gas particles colliding.

Particles colliding is the scientific basis for cold fusion https://www.iter.org/.
What they've overlooked is that the Sun has gravity and the energy in the inner part of the solar system comes from the Sun. They haven't quite replicated the parameters
of fusion in the Sun's corona. They've only replicated the corona.
With red shift, the Sun's gravitational field coupled with the Earth's might explain it.
This kind of gets into astrophysics because of how space is stretched around the Sun and the Earth.
Also, while gravity can explain why galaxies collide https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2022/08/galaxy-mergers-colliding-cosmic-matter-milky-way-andromeda/671164/, aren't they supposed to be moving further apart?
Also, if you notice how many Suns those 2 galaxies have? It's a clear enough image to where they could probably be counted. One person on Facebook who showed the first picture he took as he was pursuing a PhD in astrophysics, I mentioned look at all of those galaxies in the background behind 2 galaxies that looked similar to the 2 in the link. He didn't consider that if a galaxy is far enough away it might look like a star.
They use software to establish what's a star and what's a galaxy. He didn't understand that with a star, it's light will show what gasses are in its atmosphere/corona.

It may take me a while to digest all of the subject matter in your comment James.

But let me just say that I am a big believer in cold fusion. I think an example of basic materials needed:

container of heavy water and lithium salts
Palladium strip
Platinum coils
Deuterium
Oxygen
A way to apply voltage to container

Though the scientific consensus is saying the simple steps in the cold fusion experiment described by Pons and Fleischmann can't be repeated, Pons says the container for the experiment should undergo 20 days of electrolytic conditioning, and heat to boiling for the first run. I think the voltage needs to be applied with an oscillating intensity too. One may argue semantics, that this doesn't qualify as "cold" fusion, but who cares.

The primary goal of cold fusion would be to generate gamma radiation.

I believe:

A more complex cold fusion, with Earth being the container undergoing collisions from gravity, is what powers the Moon. The Moon would therefore be the most powerful spot of radiation in space. It powers the Sun.

But one need not think cosmically to imagine natural processes applying cold fusion.

Horny devils are also generating gamma radiation every time they have an orgasm. I think you know, that's why it's called the Blue Flame Club

You have officially triggered me to go on this rant James

The Blue Flame club is methane. If you have a butane lighter then
CH4 + 3O2 > CO2 + 2H2O. Basically a fart and a lighter produce both carbon dioxide and water.

James_ wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:Is the red shift (lengthening of light waves, galaxy shapes appearing dimmer)

Red shift doesn't affect light intensity. It affects the color. Whatever color the light would normally be, because of the movement away, the light waves are lengthened and thus the frequency is reduced. This has the effect of "shifting" the color towards red. The greater the velocity, the greater the shift towards red; this is how one can tell the relative velocity that a body is moving away from earth.

So, when you are moving, shift happens.

The amplitude, however, does not change; therefore brightness does not change.

I see. Anyhow, I think we can attribute the red shift to an atmospheric effect. Probably has something to do with more CO2 in the atmosphere. Makes Heaven's glass a bit more opaque.

No need for 1929 theories of infinite expansion.

Galaxies of course being a projection of light onto the glass from outer space.

For James, they look gassy. Lots of gas particles colliding.

Particles colliding is the scientific basis for cold fusion https://www.iter.org/.
What they've overlooked is that the Sun has gravity and the energy in the inner part of the solar system comes from the Sun. They haven't quite replicated the parameters
of fusion in the Sun's corona. They've only replicated the corona.
With red shift, the Sun's gravitational field coupled with the Earth's might explain it.
This kind of gets into astrophysics because of how space is stretched around the Sun and the Earth.
Also, while gravity can explain why galaxies collide https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2022/08/galaxy-mergers-colliding-cosmic-matter-milky-way-andromeda/671164/, aren't they supposed to be moving further apart?
Also, if you notice how many Suns those 2 galaxies have? It's a clear enough image to where they could probably be counted. One person on Facebook who showed the first picture he took as he was pursuing a PhD in astrophysics, I mentioned look at all of those galaxies in the background behind 2 galaxies that looked similar to the 2 in the link. He didn't consider that if a galaxy is far enough away it might look like a star.
They use software to establish what's a star and what's a galaxy. He didn't understand that with a star, it's light will show what gasses are in its atmosphere/corona.

Swan wrote: What is cold fusion?

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote: What is cold fusion?

It's another scam by people looking to bilk research grants from people or government organizations with lots-o-cash.

Imagine a guy holding up a test tube full of a clear solution in front of a camera, claiming that cold fusion is occurring right there in the tube, producing energy by chemically fusing atoms. Imagine the popping of corks on Champaign bottles, and festive celebration of the limitless supply of energy that will be transforming the planet and humanity.

... and imagine the proud mention that all that is needed for anyone who wishes to rule the world ... is to merely fund the project for the next few years to formalize the research and to fund the design, engineering and construction of the machines that will hand over the reins of power.

Sweet deal!

keepit wrote:
Hmm, speaking of dollars and debt: The dollar index is much higher than usual right now and the Japanese and Chinese don't seem so eager to buy our treasuries these days. They bought a lot of debt from us at much lower interest rates than the current ones which means that those treasuries are worth much less right now than when they bought them. Would this be a good time for the us to print up some dollars and buy those low interest treasuries back and wait for interest rates to go down a bit?

Spongy Iris wrote:

James_ wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:Is the red shift (lengthening of light waves, galaxy shapes appearing dimmer)

Red shift doesn't affect light intensity. It affects the color. Whatever color the light would normally be, because of the movement away, the light waves are lengthened and thus the frequency is reduced. This has the effect of "shifting" the color towards red. The greater the velocity, the greater the shift towards red; this is how one can tell the relative velocity that a body is moving away from earth.

So, when you are moving, shift happens.

The amplitude, however, does not change; therefore brightness does not change.

I see. Anyhow, I think we can attribute the red shift to an atmospheric effect. Probably has something to do with more CO2 in the atmosphere. Makes Heaven's glass a bit more opaque.

No need for 1929 theories of infinite expansion.

Galaxies of course being a projection of light onto the glass from outer space.

For James, they look gassy. Lots of gas particles colliding.

Particles colliding is the scientific basis for cold fusion https://www.iter.org/.
What they've overlooked is that the Sun has gravity and the energy in the inner part of the solar system comes from the Sun. They haven't quite replicated the parameters
of fusion in the Sun's corona. They've only replicated the corona.
With red shift, the Sun's gravitational field coupled with the Earth's might explain it.
This kind of gets into astrophysics because of how space is stretched around the Sun and the Earth.
Also, while gravity can explain why galaxies collide https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2022/08/galaxy-mergers-colliding-cosmic-matter-milky-way-andromeda/671164/, aren't they supposed to be moving further apart?
Also, if you notice how many Suns those 2 galaxies have? It's a clear enough image to where they could probably be counted. One person on Facebook who showed the first picture he took as he was pursuing a PhD in astrophysics, I mentioned look at all of those galaxies in the background behind 2 galaxies that looked similar to the 2 in the link. He didn't consider that if a galaxy is far enough away it might look like a star.
They use software to establish what's a star and what's a galaxy. He didn't understand that with a star, it's light will show what gasses are in its atmosphere/corona.

It may take me a while to digest all of the subject matter in your comment James.

But let me just say that I am a big believer in cold fusion. I think an example of basic materials needed:

container of heavy water and lithium salts
Palladium strip
Platinum coils
Deuterium
Oxygen
A way to apply voltage to container

Though the scientific consensus is saying the simple steps in the cold fusion experiment described by Pons and Fleischmann can't be repeated, Pons says the container for the experiment should undergo 20 days of electrolytic conditioning, and heat to boiling for the first run. I think the voltage needs to be applied with an oscillating intensity too. One may argue semantics, that this doesn't qualify as "cold" fusion, but who cares.

The primary goal of cold fusion would be to generate gamma radiation.

I believe:

A more complex cold fusion, with Earth being the container undergoing collisions from gravity, is what powers the Moon. The Moon would therefore be the most powerful spot of radiation in space. It powers the Sun.

But one need not think cosmically to imagine natural processes applying cold fusion.

Horny devils are also generating gamma radiation every time they have an orgasm. I think you know, that's why it's called the Blue Flame Club

You have officially triggered me to go on this rant James