New Posters beware!
| 12-04-2022 14:55 | |
GretaGroupie ★★☆☆☆(350) |
[quote]IBdaMann wrote: IBM! I love that! This is gonna be my new screen saver And I'm gonna erase JoeDator and write IBM instead! |
| RE: Jeppe Branner, where are you?12-04-2022 18:14 | |
| sealover★★★★☆ (1248) |
Jeppe Branner, where are you? You have had plenty of time to follow up but I still haven't heard from you again. THIS will be good news for the trolls. Jeppe, I will NOT post on this site again until YOU make an appearance to say SOMETHING. SOMETHING! Or did you just want your website to be a troll-infested rabbit hole? I'll look for your e mail if you don't want to post on your website. Maybe you would prefer that I NOT post anything more on your site. I won't, unless you make it clear that YOU want me to. (I almost signed with my real name) Actually, I am quite proud of my real name and real world scientific success. I thought this would be the best website to work with, but I'll move on the more fertile ground IF WE DON'T HEAR FROM THE WEBSITE OWNER. If you are just going to NEGLECT it, why won't you SELL it? Come on, Jeppe. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- GretaGroupie wrote: |
| 12-04-2022 19:01 | |
HarveyH55 ★★★★★(5197) |
sealover wrote: This it what they call 'liberal tears'... I would sell for less than 6 figures. And not SafeMoon coin either. There has to be an opposing point of view, or there would be no debate. You do know what debate means? And you've seen the site name. what the hell is your problem? We all don't have to liberals. We all don't have to think exactly the same. We aren't bees, and the planet isn't a hive. |
| RE: Please DON'T do it by e mail12-04-2022 19:23 | |
| sealover★★★★☆ (1248) |
Please DON'T do it by e mail. Dear Jeppe Branner, I appreciated your comments in your e mail to me. I don't want to join the ranks of those who ended up bitterly disappointed by your neglect of such a promising website. I need you to say it RIGHT HERE that you don't want me to give up. Otherwise, I'll assume you want things to go back to the way they were. Maybe you are happy with what your website became? If so, don't let me ruin it. You wouldn't have to BAN me. All you will have to do right now is IGNORE me and you won't hear from me. I would love to get more e mails from you, but I need you to post something on your website to the effect of you like what sealover is trying to do here. branner wrote: |
| 12-04-2022 23:28 | |
Into the Night ★★★★★(21599) |
sealover wrote: So...you are leaving the site because your personal attacks and trolling are not welcome?? Whiner. Whiners aren't successful. What about that Army of Faithful you promised would magickally appear on May 1st? Are you going to abandon them? The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan Edited on 12-04-2022 23:30 |
| 13-04-2022 01:28 | |
| duncan61★★★★★ (2021) |
Sealover.I need you to explain what is wrong and what the solution is.If you have something share it and well done on ignoring the trollers.Keep it up |
| 13-04-2022 01:37 | |
IBdaMann ★★★★★(14414) |
duncan61 wrote:Sealover.I need you to explain what is wrong and what the solution is.If you have something share it and well done on ignoring the trollers.Keep it up duncan, squeal over the furniture isn't even pretending to be ignoring anyone. He has taken to also spamming PM inboxes. You know he came here to preach, not to learn. You essentially applauded as he attacked the board with mountains of spam. You practically beg for him to let you schlobbis-knob while pretending to hate the people who are politely asking him to stop the spamming. I guess you're just a groupie for whomever bullies you with his religion. What are you waiting for? He's bent over and calling for you. Get moving. |
| 13-04-2022 02:33 | |
| HarveyH55★★★★★ (5197) |
Kind of disappointed. I was eagerly anticipating the horde of cult minion invading this site. It was be a test of faith, and the truth will set them free. I don't think the cult would assign their elite warriors to conquer a site with just a handful of truth-spreaders. But, who knows... If one of their best biogeoalchemists is reduced to tears, in just a few weeks... Most activists don't really think/question the cause, they just want belong to some group, feel empowered, piss-off others. When they realize the futility, and damage they are doing. They tend to drift to some other cause. |
| 13-04-2022 05:00 | |
gfm7175 ★★★★★(3314) |
HarveyH55 wrote: Me too... I want them to come over here. At least then it might be a bit more fair for the warmizombies and climate lemmings. |
| 13-04-2022 07:28 | |
| HarveyH55★★★★★ (5197) |
gfm7175 wrote:HarveyH55 wrote: I don't blame them. They were misled by all the marketing hype, politicians, and liberal indoctrination. Most were clueless about the planet, and nature, as they don't teach that stuff in schools anymore. It only make sense, when they don't have anything else to compare with. When confronted with the truth, there will be a lot of denial, refusal to admit they were taught wrong. They'll get mad, cry, but the more they think about. The truth will always make better sense. You don't really have to work hard to sell the truth, or understand it. The truth is simple, you don't have to add complex layers, to cover a bunch of lies and misinformation. |
| 13-04-2022 17:50 | |
| gfm7175★★★★★ (3314) |
HarveyH55 wrote:gfm7175 wrote:HarveyH55 wrote: Why waste time teaching silly useless things such as mathematics, science, history, reading, writing, critical thinking, etc... when that time can be much better spent on teaching indoctrinating children about "climate change", "gender fluidity and identity", "feminism", Marxism, BLM, critical race theory, "transgenderism", sexual perversions, and otherwise grooming young children in ways that are making Satan grin from ear to ear. HarveyH55 wrote: Indeed. The KISS (keep it simple, stupid) approach is definitely the way to go. |
| 13-04-2022 19:54 | |
| HarveyH55★★★★★ (5197) |
Wonder if the semester ends on May 1st, and the minion, are climatology majors. Wonder if climate-warmongering is like an internship. What's the base-pay for a cult minion? Maybe the just earn college credit. Maybe they are just thrilled to be chosen to serve Dr. Crap-pile... May feel a little bad, about crushing all their hopes and dreams. Liberal kids can get so emotional. Probably devastating to find out they are wasting their time, and student loan money. Least Biden will forgive their loans... |
| 13-04-2022 21:22 | |
| Into the Night★★★★★ (21599) |
HarveyH55 wrote: Using money he doesn't have. They'll have to print that money too. Hyperinflation anyone? The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
| 13-04-2022 22:29 | |
| gfm7175★★★★★ (3314) |
HarveyH55 wrote: This is very true. I had the experience of holding an online discussion with a young woman who was a feminist Marxist. After I provided her with a bit of kind rebuttal to the nonsense that she was spewing, she very quickly got mad and blocked me. It was the classic "stomp off in a hissy fit" response after hearing about how/why capitalism is the only system that creates wealth, how socialism is theft of wealth, how the very reason we were even able to hold such a conversation with each other to begin with was due to capitalism, and numerous other things of the sort. I guess that sort of thing really angers feminist Marxists. |
| 13-04-2022 22:43 | |
| Into the Night★★★★★ (21599) |
gfm7175 wrote:HarveyH55 wrote: Actually, just Marxists, feminine or masculine. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
| 14-04-2022 19:06 | |
| GretaGroupie★★☆☆☆ (350) |
sealover wrote: Sealover calm down. I'm really starting to get worried about you. If climate change is as bad as they say then it's the end of the world anyways. Just relax and have a few laughs with us.... please. |
| 14-04-2022 19:25 | |
| GretaGroupie★★☆☆☆ (350) |
Into the Night wrote: ITN, is sealover having a meltdown like trafn did? I'm worried about her. |
| 14-04-2022 22:24 | |
| Into the Night★★★★★ (21599) |
GretaGroupie wrote:Into the Night wrote: Apparently so. Though he wasn't banned like trafn was. Just up and left in a huff. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
| 15-04-2022 17:33 | |
| GretaGroupie★★☆☆☆ (350) |
Into the Night wrote: I thought sealover was a she? IBM thinks Im a BM is sealover: https://www.climate-debate.com/forum/why-i-am-here-d6-e4080-s40.php#post_83782 (I finally figured out what that little bubble above every post is for) |
| 15-04-2022 22:43 | |
| branner Administrator  ☆☆☆☆☆(34) |
@sealover Your science related posts are very welcome on the site. You have started a lot of interesting threads related to climate science, which I appreciate. @All posters Just keep writing about climate change, and stick to that, instead of personal attacks and spam. And no, I have NO PLANS of closing down or selling the site. |
| RE: Thank you!15-04-2022 22:48 | |
| sealover★★★★☆ (1248) |
Thank you! I would love to give you a list of all the members who were driven away from this site by inexcusable behavior of just one or two individuals. Perhaps you could send personal invitations to come back with the hope of a less hostile environment in the future. ------------------------------------------------------------------- branner wrote: |
| RE: "climate science" and "climate change"16-04-2022 00:31 | |
| sealover★★★★☆ (1248) |
It is noteworthy that Branner encourages discussion of climate science and climate change. It is noteworthy that these terms are used without unambiguous definition. It is noteworthy that Branner does not ever say "climate DEBATE". Never once says "debate". DOES say to stop personal attacks and spam. Who does this website belong to? ------------------------------------------------------- sealover wrote: |
| 16-04-2022 01:12 | |
| IBdaMann★★★★★ (14414) |
branner wrote:@All posters branner, you spend time on the Danish mirror site. Has anyone on that site ever defined the following: 1) The Global Climate 2) Climate Change 3) Global Warming 4) Greenhouse Effect 5) Climate Science I have never seen any unambiguous definitions for these. branner wrote: And no, I have NO PLANS of closing down or selling the site. Would you consider listing it on airbnb for perhaps a weekly vacation rental? . |
| 16-04-2022 01:18 | |
| HarveyH55★★★★★ (5197) |
sealover wrote: It' also noteworthy... You brought on your own problems, and most of your issues with the site. You came here, calling everyone trolls. Insulted pretty much everyone. Threatened those same people with getting banned, or run off by minion. We like the site the way it is. We do discuss/debate climate change issues, just not in the cult-member approved way. I'm not fearing the world is going to end, horribly and hot. I am concerned about liberals taking my freedom, liberty, and contents of my SafeMoon wallet. The planet is much bigger than mankind. We are just babies here, and still have a lot to learn about the world we live on. Sure, we get side-tracked occasionally. We aren't cult-climate zombies. There is more to life, than phantom-fear. No word on banning creepy-clown images either... |
| 16-04-2022 02:43 | |
| IBdaMann★★★★★ (14414) |
branner wrote:Just keep writing about climate change, and stick to that, instead of personal attacks and spam. I make graphics for lots of people, but you aren't around much. Here's one for you. Attached image:  |
| 16-04-2022 02:50 | |
| IBdaMann★★★★★ (14414) |
branner wrote: This is a test. I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist Attached image:  |
| 16-04-2022 04:22 | |
| duncan61★★★★★ (2021) |
Debate away sealover.What in the soil of the entire planet has given you reason to be alarmed,We are discussing climate change.I am going fishing at Trigg beach this afternoon and will take another sample and check the Potential for Hydrogen again and let you know if the limestone is starting to sizzle |
| 16-04-2022 04:37 | |
| sealover★★★★☆ (1248) |
Thank you! You are decent in your behavior, regardless of whether or not we agree. Not to get too technical, but nobody is worried about the pH of the ocean suddenly dropping below 7, or even below 8. The problem is that the ocean's acid neutralizing capacity, also known as alkalinity, is being severely depleted. Most alkalinity in sea water arises from bicarbonate ions, and far smaller concentrations of carbonate ions. This "carbonate system" buffers the sea against pH change, even as alkalinity is depleted. In any case, I'm prepared to completely ignore the hecklers and have rational discussions with decent and respectful people, such as yourself. --------------------------------------------------------------------- duncan61 wrote: |
| 16-04-2022 05:45 | |
| duncan61★★★★★ (2021) |
I find the absorption of CO2 in to the oceans hard to understand.By fair wind and fortune the people I live with came home with a soda stream kit.As per most things Granpa is the only one who regularly uses it.I have 2 bottles and I rotate them.The first thing I noticed is tap filtered water at 16-18 C.Will not accept a charge of CO2 no matter how long you squirt it in.If I chill the water then put it in the freezer on an angle to maximize surface area till Ice forms it takes very little CO2 to make it fizzy.I can visually see small ice crystals form and at first wondered if was stuff in the bottle but no it is small ice crystals.Being more gorilla than human it was an easy test.I ate it.From this can I deduce that in nature cold water accepts more CO2.The oceans around Western Australia never get below 12 C.Yet it is not that far in a straight line to Antartica.Albany faces South and has very different weather to Perth.As ocean currents which I am sure are real move water around is it reasonable to consider that as the water warms it would expel the CO2 back to the atmosphere maintaining an equilibrium.I read and watch a lot of articles and these percentages of absorption by the ocean go from 2%-98% depending on who you believe.If the PH is 8.3 does that not mean its all good.If today it reads 7.9 I will be the first to have panic attacks and go all Guy Fawkes on parliament and make Greta look like the little moaning bitch she is.I can understand how wave action puts CO2 in the ocean is there other ways? |
| 16-04-2022 06:25 | |
| IBdaMann★★★★★ (14414) |
sealover wrote:You are decent in your behavior, regardless of whether or not we agree. Oooooh, now you are lying like a dog. You HATE any and all disagreement, to the extent that you demonize those of us who merely ask you politely to define your terms. That alone causes you to have a meltdown and to fly into a spamming rage. sealover wrote:Not to get too technical, ... because you cannot. You are scientifically illiterate. You don't even know what science is, much less how to apply the scientific method. You cannot define your terms so how could you possibly "get technical"? Just between you and me, duncan asked you a question ... and you HATE that. Do you think he'll actually notice that you didn't really answer his question? Do you think he'll figure out that you have no idea what he's even asking? sealover wrote: but nobody is worried about the pH of the ocean suddenly dropping below 7, or even below 8. I see you are pretending to speak for the rest of the world again. Awesome! Well, at least you have ONE thing down to a science! Too funny! sealover wrote:The problem is that the ocean's acid neutralizing capacity, also known as alkalinity, is being severely depleted. ... and you are going to show us how? Oooops, you can't! ... because there is no such depletion occurring. You're pulling this fear-mongering out of your azz because you think everybody is just going to believe you because you claimed to be a PhD in biogentleczechosloveganism. Your science-genius fantasy role-playing is getting old. sealover wrote:In any case, I'm prepared to completely ignore the hecklers who aren't groveling at my feet and worshiping the ground on which I walk. Please do. I promise to give you all the attention you so richly deserve. Moron. Attached image:  |
| 16-04-2022 06:40 | |
| IBdaMann★★★★★ (14414) |
duncan61 wrote:I find the absorption of CO2 in to the oceans hard to understand. The atmosphere has CO2 and it has atmospheric pressure. You know that gravity thing? Well it causes the atmosphere to have its atmospheric pressure at the bottom of the atmosphere ... not increased temperatures ... increased atmospheric pressure. This pressure can be divided into "partial pressures" for the different gases in the atmosphere. I encourage you to take a moment and look up "partial pressures." The atmosphere "pushes" CO2 "into" water with its atmospheric pressure. Like everything else in nature, pressure seeks an equilibrium, and that applies to the partial pressures as well, thus the water will end up with a CO2 content comparable to the atmosphere above it due to the atmosphere's CO2 partial pressure. Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff. |
| 16-04-2022 09:07 | |
| duncan61★★★★★ (2021) |
Thank you IBDm that has cleared up so much.I have a guest over but had time to read this.I was aware CO2 as a trace element could be absorbed. |
| 16-04-2022 16:54 | |
| GretaGroupie★★☆☆☆ (350) |
branner wrote: Holey Bazoley your real Did you know sealover thought I was you but I did think Spongy was sealover once too so I guess we all make mistakes. You are like the wizard of oz who made this place but nobody sees. IBM is a know it all but you must be a god on his smart person scale. So please, please, please tell us if climate change is real because as the wizard you must know. I used to think it was real when I was with the prof but now I'm not sure.  AFTERTHOUGHT: I wathed the wizard of oz with the prof in costumes with me as the scarecrow and him as the lion. Ever see a lion hump a scarecrow? Just kidding I am still a backdoor vergin. My house moms made sure he stuck to the client rules when I moved in with him (SWAN in case your allshimers is acting up and you forgot again that means hand and oral only with a rain coat). He always wore one but I did not cause he liked the taste of my icky sticky (ewwww - gross). I tried wearing one once but it kept falling off. I do not think they make them that small. Anywho I hope the wizard answers me. Edited on 16-04-2022 17:37 |
| 16-04-2022 16:56 | |
| GretaGroupie★★☆☆☆ (350) |
duncan61 wrote: Duncan I only moan and groan between the sheets and we do not do that here. |
| 16-04-2022 19:12 | |
Spongy Iris ★★★★☆(1643) |
GretaGroupie wrote: I doubt branner will reply, but I hope he or she does. I will also jump into the conversation to give my 2 cents about why climate change is real. My analysis is very simple. No complex chemistry about F-, N-, CH4, and S-gases. Maybe I will learn about that chemistry later. Have you ever made a dry ice bomb? It's very simple. Just get a bottle that can be sealed. Put some water in it. Put some dry ice in it, which is frozen CO2. Seal the bottle. Then make sure you get far away from the bottle fast. If you try this, you may want to be outdoors in a wide open field with nobody around. The dry ice will start bubbling up pretty fast. Soon the pressure will become too great, and the bottle will explode. This simple experiment shows the basic problem of why too much CO2 in a sealed container can be dangerous. What are you talking about Spongy? some might be saying... Earth isn't inside a sealed container! To them, I say, Yes it is! Here is my proof. It is an optical illusion of 2 Suns. https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiRc33yDdcQckdnGZq7uAK9xHTdTO3ATmhPUp8W0-Jo-tzA6c1VeWsZmHjg7DJ4hfDM3DoGckTOIE7oaJZXQpJwsmkPXmxGVIjiqtLkSHzNQ-GFeh0ggeTUuNFyM9aBlfgbgdWS7S11MjnRQOn_pf_I_zzOqX_17i05dnxVmENiywqESTK4g8y999dRFw/w640-h584/Capture+_2020-02-23-08-40-27%20(1)%20(1).png All around earth, I believe there is a double pane glass ceiling. In the Bible this glass ceiling is called Heaven. Heaven protects us from the Sun's destructive corona, The story of the flood in the Bible is when Heaven shattered. The proof of Heaven shattering can be found in the Lybian glass fields. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libyan_desert_glass The trick to capturing this double Sun image is to point the camera indirectly at the Sun. In the above image, I pointed the camera at the Sun and then tilted it downward. The effect of this is drawn in the below 2 diagrams. https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgNCx1Y5dgUGFtrih1gvKOiYRc4w46WYZR-yEtl9XYaMw7Ot32420dIr0mkhqZXQPnoYfUwz1pxZHYAolFDW-C30DXO8JRpx1nuHxoPaplX9PAFu8r9tWxLpNyC51CluEJe-FWPq0GuTzbnoxQFQ-T6GTtPhfujCliudxMRzkmS8lp7vSP_Ml9GdVSoYw/w640-h472/1648410432028_image.png https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh5BIh3iSqJe2x8LybzOd3a_ZsGou5ddOekkgxqlP_XTrZSazKi6aeT7G2mn4riKiVfNYEk_7q-D8p1e3HBz0yZFc4avJL9g6r0cqhKRd5iOHzKgvMe0fPB33LNVrp34gv7TEy8bNIjbPcyn5j8j8PyX-gXArgUfXXiAErsCHh-IDPbqqEs5XwgvF1msQ/w640-h464/1648410432029_image.png If you look directly at the Sun, you can only see its glare in Heaven. But if you look indirectly, you can see both the Sun itself, and its glare in Heaven. Usually, the Sun's glare is so bright, that it still covers the actual Sun, and this effect goes unnoticed. But on the day the above double Sun picture was taken, wildfire smoke had dimmed the Sun substantially, and the glare was weak enough for the actual Sun to be seen. Sorry the IMG link isn't working for me, but if you click on the URL links, you will see the pictures I'm trying to share. %20(1).png)
Edited on 16-04-2022 19:17 |
| 16-04-2022 19:22 | |
| GretaGroupie★★☆☆☆ (350) |
Spongy Iris wrote: I do not know Spongy. I am not a religion or god person. If god is so smart then why did he/she/it make such a stupid world? |
| 16-04-2022 20:49 | |
| Into the Night★★★★★ (21599) |
GretaGroupie wrote:Spongy Iris wrote: Why do parents have stupid children? The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
| 16-04-2022 20:50 | |
| Spongy Iris★★★★☆ (1643) |
GretaGroupie wrote:Spongy Iris wrote: A stupid world? What is that? Sounds like Hell. A donut hole. Maybe it is to heal people. 2 heads are better than 1...
Edited on 16-04-2022 20:51 |
| RE: Tell Brannon! I've got your back.17-04-2022 01:34 | |
| Im a BM★★★☆☆ (595) |
Tell Brannon! I've got your back. This kind of behavior should not be tolerated. Tell Brannon how sealover refuses to stop trolling and spamming your thread. I bet that if Brannon tells sealover to STOP trolling your threads... Well, if sealover just keeps trolling your threads after that, sealover should be banned. Trolling and spamming are just wrong! But first you have to show Brannon how you politely asked sealover to stop trolling your thread. And then you just got 10 consecutive spams from the same troll again. That sealover is SUCH A TROLL! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- HarveyH55 wrote:sealover wrote: |
| 17-04-2022 03:44 | |
| IBdaMann★★★★★ (14414) |
 Spongy Iris wrote:All around earth, I believe there is a double pane glass ceiling. In the Bible this glass ceiling is called Heaven. Job 37:18 Hast thou with him spread out the sky, which is strong, and as a molten looking glass?  GretaGroupie wrote: If god is so smart then why did he/she/it make such a stupid world? John 7:7 The world cannot hate you; but me it hateth, because I testify of it, that the works thereof are evil. Into the Night wrote:Why do parents have stupid children? Matthew 18:10 Take heed that ye despise not one of these little ones; for I say unto you, That in heaven their angels do always behold the face of my Father which is in heaven. |
Join the debate New Posters beware!:
Related content
| Threads | Replies | Last post |
| Eisenhower was right - beware us | 13 | 16-10-2015 20:07 |