Remember me
▼ Content

New Posters beware!



Page 6 of 6<<<456
15-05-2022 10:01
duncan61
★★★★☆
(1729)
I am on enough gun and you can block other posters. You can see they have posted and you have the option to open their posts or just go straight past.I blocked one poster who called himself Daddy bang and he often posted pictures of his very young daughter in nappies and nothing else.He was a full on Far North Queensland sort of guy and argued with me that I could not of had a BREN Gun in the Australian Army.I served May 83-May86 and Transport and Engineers had Australian converted to 308/7.62 NATO L4A1 BREN Guns.I ended up posting my service certificate to prove it but he still would not get it.He did not last much longer as he was getting in to everyone on the site.ITN and IBDM would argue its freedom of speach but I think forums should be moderated.They both would have been gone a long time ago
15-05-2022 10:18
duncan61
★★★★☆
(1729)
Sealover.If you want to head over to Earth Science Stack Exchange.I have just found it and finding it interesting
15-05-2022 20:15
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(18412)
Im a BM wrote:
duncan61 wrote:
Just ignore them its not hard to do.My concern was always is there any truth to the global warming claims and 3 years later it would take a lot of compelling evidence to get me to believe the planet is in climate trouble of any sort due to manmade emmisions,The planet is too big



If Jeppe Branner were interested in my advice, one member alluded to something called an "ignore feature".

Nobody would be banned or censored in any way.

I tried to figure out if there were already such a feature on this website, and I can't find it.

Maybe I just don't know where to look.

Would it be technically difficult to install such a feature, if it isn't here already?

I don't know.

I DID express to the site owner my belief that no intervention was required regarding banning anyone or taking time to step in as moderator.

I'd love to know more about what an "ignore feature" is, and whether or not this is something that Branner Jeppe could easily install, if it isn't already here.

Personally, I'd love to have the option to easily avoid having to hear the noise.

Ignore features don't work. They only remove yourself from the conversation.

You seem to spend most of your time whining about what YOU are doing.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
15-05-2022 20:17
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(18412)
duncan61 wrote:
I am on enough gun and you can block other posters. You can see they have posted and you have the option to open their posts or just go straight past.I blocked one poster who called himself Daddy bang and he often posted pictures of his very young daughter in nappies and nothing else.He was a full on Far North Queensland sort of guy and argued with me that I could not of had a BREN Gun in the Australian Army.I served May 83-May86 and Transport and Engineers had Australian converted to 308/7.62 NATO L4A1 BREN Guns.I ended up posting my service certificate to prove it but he still would not get it.He did not last much longer as he was getting in to everyone on the site.ITN and IBDM would argue its freedom of speach but I think forums should be moderated.They both would have been gone a long time ago


This forum is moderated. I am still here, and so is IBdaMann.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
15-05-2022 20:17
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(18412)
duncan61 wrote:
Sealover.If you want to head over to Earth Science Stack Exchange.I have just found it and finding it interesting


Why? Because any idiot can answer a question, no matter how little they know?


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
RE: It's still too ugly here to invite my friends15-05-2022 20:19
Im a BM
★★☆☆☆
(158)
duncan61 wrote:
I am on enough gun and you can block other posters. You can see they have posted and you have the option to open their posts or just go straight past.I blocked one poster who called himself Daddy bang and he often posted pictures of his very young daughter in nappies and nothing else.He was a full on Far North Queensland sort of guy and argued with me that I could not of had a BREN Gun in the Australian Army.I served May 83-May86 and Transport and Engineers had Australian converted to 308/7.62 NATO L4A1 BREN Guns.I ended up posting my service certificate to prove it but he still would not get it.He did not last much longer as he was getting in to everyone on the site.ITN and IBDM would argue its freedom of speach but I think forums should be moderated.They both would have been gone a long time ago


I agree with you duncan61, that one should have the will power to ignore the bullies.

I started to invite a bunch of students and instructors when I first got here, and had to renege.

The insults are just too ugly.

The two big ****s who have done 95% of the damage have an excellent track record of driving people away.

1600 signed up. 1590 were driven away.

In my case, my first day here I was called a "liar" immediately, accused of being a Communist infiltrator, and ridiculed for not understanding any science.

It shouldn't require extra thick skin to discuss scientific reality on a website.

A moderator would have been good to have in the last seven years.

But, it looks like OTHER websites actually HAVE an "ignore feature".

That may be my suggestion in my next email to Jeppe Branner.

I think he was a bit too unwilling to see the truth of the sociopathic sadist thing.

That was not name calling.

That was just identifying an observable characteristic of the dominant troll.
15-05-2022 21:01
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(18412)
Im a BM wrote:
duncan61 wrote:
I am on enough gun and you can block other posters. You can see they have posted and you have the option to open their posts or just go straight past.I blocked one poster who called himself Daddy bang and he often posted pictures of his very young daughter in nappies and nothing else.He was a full on Far North Queensland sort of guy and argued with me that I could not of had a BREN Gun in the Australian Army.I served May 83-May86 and Transport and Engineers had Australian converted to 308/7.62 NATO L4A1 BREN Guns.I ended up posting my service certificate to prove it but he still would not get it.He did not last much longer as he was getting in to everyone on the site.ITN and IBDM would argue its freedom of speach but I think forums should be moderated.They both would have been gone a long time ago


I agree with you duncan61, that one should have the will power to ignore the bullies.

I would rather point out their bullying, such as yours.
Im a BM wrote:
I started to invite a bunch of students and instructors when I first got here, and had to renege.

BS.
Im a BM wrote:
The insults are just too ugly.

You make 'em.
Im a BM wrote:
The two big ****s who have done 95% of the damage have an excellent track record of driving people away.

1600 signed up. 1590 were driven away.

False equivalence fallacy. The number of users that ever signed up for a forum is always much greater than the number of active users (except for a new forums).
Im a BM wrote:
In my case, my first day here I was called a "liar" immediately, accused of being a Communist infiltrator, and ridiculed for not understanding any science.

Because you lie constantly, have no clue what science is, routinely discard the laws of thermodynamics, the Stefan-Boltzmann law, and chemistry; and are a member of the Church of Global Warming, a fundamentalist style religion that stems from the Church of Karl Marx.
Im a BM wrote:
It shouldn't require extra thick skin to discuss scientific reality on a website.

You deny science. You have no idea what 'reality' even means. Buzzword fallacies.
Im a BM wrote:
A moderator would have been good to have in the last seven years.

We have it.
Im a BM wrote:
But, it looks like OTHER websites actually HAVE an "ignore feature".

And they are useless. All they do is remove yourself from the conversation.
Im a BM wrote:
That may be my suggestion in my next email to Jeppe Branner.

Feel free.
Im a BM wrote:
I think he was a bit too unwilling to see the truth of the sociopathic sadist thing.

That was not name calling.

That was just identifying an observable characteristic of the dominant troll.

That was name calling (insult fallacies) and psychoquackery. It is also trolling. Inversion fallacy.

For the past month, YOU have been the dominant troll.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
RE: I can empathize with the frustration, posting a service certificate.15-05-2022 21:18
Im a BM
★★☆☆☆
(158)
duncan61 wrote:
I am on enough gun and you can block other posters. You can see they have posted and you have the option to open their posts or just go straight past.I blocked one poster who called himself Daddy bang and he often posted pictures of his very young daughter in nappies and nothing else.He was a full on Far North Queensland sort of guy and argued with me that I could not of had a BREN Gun in the Australian Army.I served May 83-May86 and Transport and Engineers had Australian converted to 308/7.62 NATO L4A1 BREN Guns.I ended up posting my service certificate to prove it but he still would not get it.He did not last much longer as he was getting in to everyone on the site.ITN and IBDM would argue its freedom of speach but I think forums should be moderated.They both would have been gone a long time ago


I understand why you posted your service certificate.

It is enraging to be called a liar by a liar. A lying pedophile, no less.

Of course, even a service certificate was dismissed as meaningless, like some kind of "buzzword".

Even advanced degrees from the world's most prestigious universities and publications in the world's most prestigious scientific journals are dismissed as meaningless.

Even the vocabulary that real world scientists all understand is dismissed as meaningless. "Buzzwords."

But I think that installing an ignore feature could make a world of difference.
15-05-2022 22:36
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(11759)
squeal over furniture's sock wrote:Even advanced degrees from the world's most prestigious universities and publications in the world's most prestigious scientific journals are dismissed as meaningless.

Universities aren't very prestigious if their degrees are worthless, and journals aren't very prestigious or scientific if they peddle physics violations just to manipulate people.

squeal over furniture's sock wrote:Even the vocabulary that real world scientists all understand is dismissed as meaningless. "Buzzwords."

They aren't real-world scientists if they are scientifically illiterate and are merely trying to slide by with the help of a smokescreen of gibber-babble and empty buzzwords.

squeal over furniture's sock wrote:But I think that installing an ignore feature could make a world of difference.

What's preventing you from turning on your own natural "ignore" function? Whatever it is, it will also prevent you from using any board "ignore" function that is installed.

.
Attached image:

15-05-2022 23:12
HarveyH55Profile picture★★★★★
(4239)
Im a BM wrote:
duncan61 wrote:
I am on enough gun and you can block other posters. You can see they have posted and you have the option to open their posts or just go straight past.I blocked one poster who called himself Daddy bang and he often posted pictures of his very young daughter in nappies and nothing else.He was a full on Far North Queensland sort of guy and argued with me that I could not of had a BREN Gun in the Australian Army.I served May 83-May86 and Transport and Engineers had Australian converted to 308/7.62 NATO L4A1 BREN Guns.I ended up posting my service certificate to prove it but he still would not get it.He did not last much longer as he was getting in to everyone on the site.ITN and IBDM would argue its freedom of speach but I think forums should be moderated.They both would have been gone a long time ago


I agree with you duncan61, that one should have the will power to ignore the bullies.

I started to invite a bunch of students and instructors when I first got here, and had to renege.

The insults are just too ugly.

The two big ****s who have done 95% of the damage have an excellent track record of driving people away.

1600 signed up. 1590 were driven away.

In my case, my first day here I was called a "liar" immediately, accused of being a Communist infiltrator, and ridiculed for not understanding any science.

It shouldn't require extra thick skin to discuss scientific reality on a website.

A moderator would have been good to have in the last seven years.

But, it looks like OTHER websites actually HAVE an "ignore feature".

That may be my suggestion in my next email to Jeppe Branner.

I think he was a bit too unwilling to see the truth of the sociopathic sadist thing.

That was not name calling.

That was just identifying an observable characteristic of the dominant troll.


But, you did lie. You had two screen names, though I don't think anyone thought there were two separate people. Suspect the lies run deeper, and freely. This website isn't what you want, but you seem to thing manure-pile science is a good fit here. Never had much interest in manure piles, one of the worst farm chores. Perhaps that experience from my youth, is why I don't see your enthusiasm. Climate change is BS marketing crap as well. So, I really don't care what get's discussed here. My only concern has been politics, and climate change used to mess with my life, and paycheck.

The websites you visit, are entirely your choice. It's your time, to spend as you please. If you don't like a website, you don't have to waste time on it. There are many more, spend the time looking for one that fits your interest. Or spend the time building your own. There a number of free-hosting options, or you can buy server space. Some are cheap.
15-05-2022 23:15
GasGuzzlerProfile picture★★★★★
(2431)

squealing while bent over the furniture wrote:

It is enraging to be called a liar by a liar.

It is enraging when my hard earned tax dollars are being wasted to save a planet from warming by people who don't have a fugging clue what heat is or how it flows.

Go ahead and tell me more about heat residence time and radiational energy. Then tell me your PhD isn't worthless.


I just make shit up- sealover
Edited on 15-05-2022 23:17
RE: The dominant troll is committing a crime on your website.16-05-2022 03:10
sealover
★★★☆☆
(803)
branner wrote:
@sealover
Your science related posts are very welcome on the site. You have started a lot of interesting threads related to climate science, which I appreciate.

@All posters
Just keep writing about climate change, and stick to that, instead of personal attacks and spam.

And no, I have NO PLANS of closing down or selling the site.



Hello, Jeppe Branner.

You have known my true identity for months now.

But I never once published my name here.

I have now been doxed by the dominant troll.

He has used your website to publish defamatory lies of about person for whom he has provided identifying information - name, former place of employment, etc.

He has been shitting all over your website for years in many other ways.

Now he is also using your platform to commit libel. A criminal act.
16-05-2022 03:26
James_
★★★☆☆
(888)
GasGuzzler wrote:

squealing while bent over the furniture wrote:

It is enraging to be called a liar by a liar.

It is enraging when my hard earned tax dollars are being wasted to save a planet from warming by people who don't have a fugging clue what heat is or how it flows.

Go ahead and tell me more about heat residence time and radiational energy. Then tell me your PhD isn't worthless.



Heat is a flow of energy. A flow of energy is created proportional to
KE = 1/2mv^2 = 3/2kT. This is pretty basic.
Can we please move beyond the basics a 6th grader would understand?
RE: doxed worse than I thought16-05-2022 03:36
sealover
★★★☆☆
(803)
On the thread

"Tell your old college professors about climate-debate.com for biogeochemistry"

Posted and published on 16-05-2022 at 02:35.

IBdaMann doxed a member about whom he has been publishing defamatory lies.

He published the member's full name, age, date of birth, city of residence, high school, names of sons, nephews, mother, place where he worked ten year ago...

If this isn't enough to get him banned, what is?

I'll email this to Jeppe Branner personally to be sure he doesn't miss it.

We're cool like that.

He LIKES what I've been doing here.

Said so himself, didn't he?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

sealover wrote:
branner wrote:
@sealover
Your science related posts are very welcome on the site. You have started a lot of interesting threads related to climate science, which I appreciate.

@All posters
Just keep writing about climate change, and stick to that, instead of personal attacks and spam.

And no, I have NO PLANS of closing down or selling the site.



Hello, Jeppe Branner.

You have known my true identity for months now.

But I never once published my name here.

I have now been doxed by the dominant troll.

He has used your website to publish defamatory lies of about person for whom he has provided identifying information - name, former place of employment, etc.

He has been shitting all over your website for years in many other ways.

Now he is also using your platform to commit libel. A criminal act.
16-05-2022 18:00
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(18412)
sealover wrote:
branner wrote:
@sealover
Your science related posts are very welcome on the site. You have started a lot of interesting threads related to climate science, which I appreciate.

@All posters
Just keep writing about climate change, and stick to that, instead of personal attacks and spam.

And no, I have NO PLANS of closing down or selling the site.



Hello, Jeppe Branner.

You have known my true identity for months now.

But I never once published my name here.

I have now been doxed by the dominant troll.

He has used your website to publish defamatory lies of about person for whom he has provided identifying information - name, former place of employment, etc.

He has been shitting all over your website for years in many other ways.

Now he is also using your platform to commit libel. A criminal act.

Nope. No libel here...move along...move along...

YOU published your name and some personal information here. You are the ONLY one to blame. Inversion fallacy.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
16-05-2022 18:01
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(18412)
James_ wrote:
GasGuzzler wrote:

squealing while bent over the furniture wrote:

It is enraging to be called a liar by a liar.

It is enraging when my hard earned tax dollars are being wasted to save a planet from warming by people who don't have a fugging clue what heat is or how it flows.

Go ahead and tell me more about heat residence time and radiational energy. Then tell me your PhD isn't worthless.



Heat is a flow of energy. A flow of energy is created proportional to
KE = 1/2mv^2 = 3/2kT. This is pretty basic.
Can we please move beyond the basics a 6th grader would understand?

Heat is not a flow of energy.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
16-05-2022 18:12
duncan61
★★★★☆
(1729)
Let me guess.This is not true
What is heat energy easy definition?
Heat is the form of energy that is transferred between systems or objects with different temperatures (flowing from the high-temperature system to the low-temperature system). Also referred to as heat energy or thermal energy. Heat is typically measured in Btu, calories or joules.
Page 6 of 6<<<456





Join the debate New Posters beware!:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Eisenhower was right - beware us1316-10-2015 20:07
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact