tmiddles wrote:IBdaMann wrote:
I agree. Thank you for the suggestion.
Sea level varies from place to place in the world - keepit
Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris
Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit
If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles
Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles
Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn
You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.
The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank
:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude
IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
Into the Night wrote:
Ahhhh, ok. That all makes sense.
Speaking for others is definitely a good one.
tmiddles wrote:gfm7175 wrote:I'd suggest that you stop playing the "woe is me" victim card,...Not that at all.
What are we doing?
Point what out?
No, he has actually been quite accurate with that. I have read through some exchanges between you and him and you and IB for myself, and I've seen them directly answer the questions that you constantly whine about them not answering.
English is not "meaningless characters".
I care about it. I fully appreciate that he points out the fallacies that you commit. I will point them out too from time to time.
No, logic is simply "incomprehensible" to you in the same manner that Swahili is "incomprehensible" to you. You simply haven't learned it. That doesn't surprise me any, since you don't know how one learns science, or how to ride a bike. Obviously, speaking Liberal requires no learning, since you're able to do that quite well. That "ability" seems to be a result of becoming infected with the Liberal pathogen.
tmiddles wrote:gfm7175 wrote:A lot of the "popular definitions" of fallacies that you will run into online are incomplete....You make my point for me. So put a listing here of what YOU mean when YOU say something.
Sure, I could compile a listing of several common fallacies and list definitions for them... OR, you could simply ask what they mean and actually learn them instead of constantly mindlessly making reference to some online source.
I'll let you in on a little secret. I do not pull up any references when I type out these responses to you. I use my own mind to form my own arguments. What I express in my responses is what I have learned: through studying, practicing the application thereof, much repetition of the first two, and making mistakes along the way.
tmiddles wrote:gfm7175 wrote:That is a lie.
Nope. The truth is not a lie.
tmiddles wrote:IBdaMann wrote:To make a list of what ITN means when he says something I would need his participation. I don't have it.
He did not ask you about ITN. Read it again.
Edited on 05-02-2020 17:41
gfm7175 wrote:you say when according to you a simple link would prove me wrong.
Simply not plausible that ITN would pass on proving me wrong.
"RQAA" is a fraud
tmiddles wrote:gfm7175 wrote:you say when according to you a simple link would prove me wrong.
|Into the Night★★★★★
No argument presented. No new questions.
The Parrot Killer
Edited on 05-02-2020 21:41
|Trump Sued Over New Coal Rules||0||14-08-2019 02:37|