My Idea

We should recognize the sacrifice of those who have swum to the bottom of the shithole so that we can enjoy the freedoms of remaining outside the shithole.

mistytimes40 wrote: I did warn you guys this idea was probably stupid anyways

IBdaMann wrote:

mistytimes40 wrote: I did warn you guys this idea was probably stupid anyways

... or it is brilliant. It all comes down to what you do with the shithole really.


.

mistytimes40 wrote:
Can we at least all agree, we shouldn't be breeding if we can't financially afford it? I mean, come on give me that much!

mistytimes40 wrote:
This idea that somehow passing on a gene (one of the whatever how many number), and we just continue to be stupid. The Earth itself isn't what we're saving, because make no mistake, the Earth will shake us off like fleas. NO ONE is living through this, but it's a matter of how we want to live. What in the Hell is wrong with you people, grow up kiddos

Into the Night wrote:

mistytimes40 wrote:
Can we at least all agree, we shouldn't be breeding if we can't financially afford it? I mean, come on give me that much!

Nope. Not even that much. YOU don't get to decide what people can afford.

mistytimes40 wrote:Which i clearly won already

IBdaMann wrote:

mistytimes40 wrote:Which i clearly won already

Please allow me to be the first to congratulate you on a well deserved victory. That was a smashing performance. Well done.


.

Xadoman wrote:
misty, I have better idea. For those who do not breed( who have voluntarily let themselves sterilized) the goverment should pay universal basic income. Those who want to breed - they should manage on their own. In the future robots will do most of the work. So my idea looks into the future. Also, all of it is voluntary not forced.

mistytimes40 wrote:
Which i clearly won already

mistytimes40 wrote:
Winning a debate online is like winning a push-up contest, we all come out losers really if ya think bout it, but i'll enjoy this honor of DESTROYING the arguments of my foes!

Why pay homosexuals and masterbaters a universal basic income, since they are non-breeders anyway?

Why sterilize men? Women are where the babies come from. If they want more than two children, could they continue to shop around, until the find a male, who isn't shooting
blanks

What happens to orphaned children, if all their relatives already have two children in the household? Would the relatives be penalized for taking them in? Or would the be awarded to some pervert, non-breeder, homosexual couple?

I don't know about vasectomies these days, but they were once reversible, and occasionally reversed on their own, wasn't 100% permanent. What would be the deal, if a man becomes a non-breeder, after his two kids, for the 'free money', and later loses one or both kids to illness or accident? Can he get reversed, to replace the lost kids, and still keep the 'free money'?

Since non-breeding, progressive democrats are pushing all this, who is going to produce children for homosexual couples, to corrupt and exploit? I mean adopt and raise as their own, since babies don't come out the back-side.

mistytimes40 wrote: i just can't imagine why any moron wants a whining, pooping, time burden, financial drain, woman tethering, emotional drain ect. kid around.

mistytimes40 wrote:To play "daddy role" or what? I don't get it. I'll pass and stick with a dog (and that's more than enough)

mistytimes40 wrote: and even if i did want to be "dada", it wouldnt be in this world.

mistytimes40 wrote: To each their own i guess. i live my life, you live yours. Be a good dad if you already burdened by such a problem, but i'll pass and spare the world another

What you've described, is socialism, to the extreme, where the wealthy elite, get to do as they please, at the expense of the majority of the population.

mistytimes40 wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

mistytimes40 wrote:
Can we at least all agree, we shouldn't be breeding if we can't financially afford it? I mean, come on give me that much!

Nope. Not even that much. YOU don't get to decide what people can afford.

I get to decide what I want to decide when I want to decide it parrot,
...deleted Mantras 5...1...24...1...22...7...

mistytimes40 wrote:
Anyway, we getting off topic again. Simple a little less breeding is good for everything.

mistytimes40 wrote:
Which i clearly won already

Xadoman wrote:
misty, I have better idea. For those who do not breed( who have voluntarily let themselves sterilized) the goverment should pay universal basic income. Those who want to breed - they should manage on their own. In the future robots will do most of the work. So my idea looks into the future. Also, all of it is voluntary not forced.

mistytimes40 wrote:
i just can't imagine why any moron wants a whining, pooping, time burden, financial drain, woman tethering, emotional drain ect. kid around. To play "daddy role" or what? I don't get it. I'll pass and stick with a dog (and that's more than enough)

and even if i did want to be "dada", it wouldnt be in this world. To each their own i guess. i live my life, you live yours. Be a good dad if you already burdened by such a problem, but i'll pass and spare the world another

if things weren't such an overly complicated mess (which it could always be worse as was pointed out earlier by what's his name), MAYBE, and that's a big maybe. World aint never gonna be perfect, so in my heroic deed to myself and to "my potential future offspring", I'M NOT BREEDING,

GOT THAT LADIES!?

mistytimes40 wrote:
And this stupid argument about "passing genes on" Wouldn't that be better for your genes if everyone else didn't breed? This whole thread has gone to stupid town..

Xadoman wrote:

What you've described, is socialism, to the extreme, where the wealthy elite, get to do as they please, at the expense of the majority of the population.

No , it is capitalism. Wealthy elite

Xadoman wrote:
who own factories full of robots that produce everything needed

Xadoman wrote:
simply have money to rise offspring.

Xadoman wrote:
There probably will be some low skill jobs that need human intervention in the future but for most people( my guess for 80-90% of population) there will be no job in the future.

Xadoman wrote:
What to do with those people?

Xadoman wrote:
To give them simply money would not work because they would breed like rabbits ( comparable example is Africa).

Into the Night wrote:African rabbits breed faster than American rabbits??

HarveyH55 wrote:
What makes you think the socialist elite would stop at sterilization? Why not euthanasia, as well? You've already decided the vast majority of the population are useless breeders, producing more useless breeders, like rabbits. When the 'humane' society, gets too many animals, the kill them, humanely, of course. They do sterilize, each and everyone, before they are 'adopted' as well.