Remember me
▼ Content

My Idea



Page 1 of 4123>>>
My Idea25-02-2020 16:52
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
So I think I've wanted to vent this somewhere just to get it off my chest. And these are my ideas and would love to hear feedback on their feasibility.

-So first and foremost, anything that is to be done can never have any bearing on Constitutional Rights, and that is something very important in America, so to be dabbling in any sort of debate there would render any change USELESS and a waste of time.

-Second, companies can continue to operate, but sound pollution is a serious concern, but as long as that is respected, tested, and properly done it's okay.

Now here's my idea that I think would really see the planet to a better place. Organic fruits, and vegetable seeds should be planted almost everywhere (like imagine apple trees, plum trees, cherries, ect. trees) almost everywhere (in an orderly fashion of course). Organic vegetables everywhere as well.

Animals in pasture abound, and the birthrate should be limited to 2 kids per couple (number could be adjusted and aside from twin anomalies) but you get the picture. Otherwise say starting at whatever specific year it goes into effect, you would face a tax penalty for having that extra kid.

We still live just like we live, but food would be plentiful (imagine walking down the street and just being able to pick an apple off the tree for free, because there would be so much of them EVERYWHERE

All these added food plants and trees will negate pollution. Could even like airdrop organic vegetable seeds over forrests (National Parks, ect),

Pay our farmers very generously, so there can be pastures of plentiful animals

So anyway, I had to vent. Let me know if it sounds stupid, or maybe tweak it a little make it seem workable, but I think you get the picture.

Thanks.
Edited on 25-02-2020 17:23
25-02-2020 17:16
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
-I do believe all those extra trees would decrease the global warming effect substantially by filtering the pollution
-Food would be more plentiful

It's a win win, and we wouldn't have to change a thing, aside from people having too many children. Can't breed like rabbits and somehow think that's sustainable

Edited on 25-02-2020 17:19
25-02-2020 19:56
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(11753)
mistytimes40 wrote:
So I think I've wanted to vent this somewhere just to get it off my chest. And these are my ideas and would love to hear feedback on their feasibility.

Ok. Let's cover each of your arguments one at a time.
mistytimes40 wrote:
-So first and foremost, anything that is to be done can never have any bearing on Constitutional Rights, and that is something very important in America, so to be dabbling in any sort of debate there would render any change USELESS and a waste of time.

No right comes from a piece of paper. Constitutions define a government and give it certain powers and authorities. Anything outside of that is unconstitutional. The United States is a federated republic, meaning it has layers of constitutions and governments defined by them.
mistytimes40 wrote:
-Second, companies can continue to operate, but sound pollution is a serious concern, but as long as that is respected, tested, and properly done it's okay.
Can't hear your rock and roll?
mistytimes40 wrote:
Now here's my idea that I think would really see the planet to a better place. Organic fruits, and vegetable seeds should be planted almost everywhere (like imagine apple trees, plum trees, cherries, ect. trees) almost everywhere (in an orderly fashion of course). Organic vegetables everywhere as well.
All plant life is organic. Farmers already plant trees in an orderly fashion. It makes it easier for harvesting later.
mistytimes40 wrote:
Animals in pasture abound,
They already do.
mistytimes40 wrote:
and the birthrate should be limited to 2 kids per couple (number could be adjusted and aside from twin anomalies) but you get the picture.
Why? Who are YOU to decide an arbitrary number of kids that someone can have?
mistytimes40 wrote:
Otherwise say starting at whatever specific year it goes into effect, you would face a tax penalty for having that extra kid.
Unconstitutional.
mistytimes40 wrote:
We still live just like we live, but food would be plentiful
Food already is plentiful.
mistytimes40 wrote:
(imagine walking down the street and just being able to pick an apple off the tree for free, because there would be so much of them EVERYWHERE
This isn't Eden. Food cost money. It takes effort to raise apples. They're pretty damn cheap too. In addition, food preservation methods make apples available year round in most places.
mistytimes40 wrote:
All these added food plants and trees will negate pollution.
Define 'pollution'.
mistytimes40 wrote:
Could even like airdrop organic vegetable seeds over forrests (National Parks, ect),
Don't want to preserve what made the national park a national park, eh?
mistytimes40 wrote:
Pay our farmers very generously,
Farmers aren't paid wages. They are paid according to the value of their crop they bring in. Price controls don't work.
mistytimes40 wrote:
so there can be pastures of plentiful animals
There already are.
mistytimes40 wrote:
So anyway, I had to vent. Let me know if it sounds stupid, or maybe tweak it a little make it seem workable, but I think you get the picture.

Thanks.

I think you've been living in the city too long.


The Parrot Killer
25-02-2020 19:58
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(11753)
mistytimes40 wrote:
-I do believe all those extra trees would decrease the global warming effect substantially

Define 'global warming effect'. Buzzword fallacy.
mistytimes40 wrote:
by filtering the pollution

Define 'pollution'. Buzzword fallacy.
mistytimes40 wrote:
-Food would be more plentiful

It already is.
mistytimes40 wrote:
It's a win win, and we wouldn't have to change a thing, aside from people having too many children. Can't breed like rabbits and somehow think that's sustainable


YOU don't get to dictate how many kids people can have. People are not a liability. They are an asset. It's that many more hands to produce food, build wealth, or improve the environment.


The Parrot Killer
25-02-2020 20:07
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
Thanks Night for clarifying all that for me. Thought it was kinda stupid but needed that.
Edited on 25-02-2020 20:22
25-02-2020 20:29
James___
★★★★★
(2420)
mistytimes40 wrote:
Thanks Parrot for clarifying all that for me. Thought it was kinda stupid but needed that.



He's an anachronism. His own taught him a couple of words, the "air" quality in his "cage" is from natural and possibly organic sources, pot-pourri for the soul, and now the bird thinks he's a person. Either than or it's owner needs to clean his cage and not leave their computer on so they can mimic what they see.
The "real" ITN; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ijiGPrl3fM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebFwpfzzeUY
Edited on 25-02-2020 20:32
25-02-2020 20:29
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(11753)
mistytimes40 wrote:
Thanks Night for clarifying all that for me. Thought it was kinda stupid but needed that.


No problem. City living is rather isolating. It can leave one susceptible to the constant drumbeat of misinformation around them. Much of that comes from socialism (and Marxism). It is designed to get you convinced that business and corporations are inherently evil, and that people are inherently self destructive and must be controlled by government.


The Parrot Killer
25-02-2020 20:41
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
Into the Night wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
Thanks Night for clarifying all that for me. Thought it was kinda stupid but needed that.


No problem. City living is rather isolating. It can leave one susceptible to the constant drumbeat of misinformation around them. Much of that comes from socialism (and Marxism). It is designed to get you convinced that business and corporations are inherently evil, and that people are inherently self destructive and must be controlled by government.


Just another stupid rabbit hole yep, thanks.
25-02-2020 22:43
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(6253)
mistytimes40 wrote: Organic fruits, and vegetable seeds should be planted almost everywhere (like imagine apple trees, plum trees, cherries, ect. trees) almost everywhere (in an orderly fashion of course). Organic vegetables everywhere as well.

Can you give me an example of an inorganic fruit? ... or an inorganic vegetable?

mistytimes40 wrote: Animals in pasture abound, and the birthrate should be limited to 2 kids per couple (number could be adjusted and aside from twin anomalies) but you get the picture. Otherwise say starting at whatever specific year it goes into effect, you would face a tax penalty for having that extra kid.

You somehow misspelled "required to produce a minimum of" as "limited to" (I'm sure it was autocorrect) which has an embarrassing opposite semantic. Yes, we want to have as much meat available as possible to slap on that Constitutionally protected grill while invoking our rights to life, barbeque and the pursuit of happiness. Remember, the 1st Amendment protects even "obscene overcooking."

mistytimes40 wrote: We still live just like we live, but food would be plentiful (imagine walking down the street and just being able to pick an apple off the tree for free, because there would be so much of them EVERYWHERE

And since they are EVERYWHERE, no one would mind if I cleared a few hundred to build a shopping mall. People need to shop, right?


mistytimes40 wrote: All these added food plants and trees will negate pollution.

[I'm sorry; I'm laughing too hard to comment on this one]

mistytimes40 wrote: Could even like airdrop organic vegetable seeds over forrests (National Parks, ect),

[I'm imagining onlookers unable to breathe from laughter at watching this apparent good intention while knowing immediately that it had to be a leftist's idea]

mistytimes40 wrote:Pay our farmers very generously, so there can be pastures of plentiful animals

Should we just have the Treasury print the extra money to be distributed? Shouldn't we do the same thing for teachers? ... and for firemen? ... police? ...nurses? ... illegal aliens who only want a better life? ... minorities, because they are clearly victims and just want a level playing field? ... starving artists? ... women, until sufficient reparations have been paid to cover the pay inequity of the last 4,332 years? ... everybody else except for caucasion males to counter white privilege?

I think you are onto something big!



.


Sea level varies from place to place in the world - keepit

Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris

Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit

If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles

Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
25-02-2020 23:38
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
Can we at least all agree, we shouldn't be breeding if we can't financially afford it? I mean, come on give me that much!

Edited on 25-02-2020 23:38
25-02-2020 23:42
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
ugh n/m. stupidly picked a "debate forum"
26-02-2020 00:16
Xadoman
★★☆☆☆
(160)
mistytimes40 wrote:
Can we at least all agree, we shouldn't be breeding if we can't financially afford it? I mean, come on give me that much!


If you are able to breed being homeless bum then you are facially and physically very attractive to females. Females by nature go for the best genes(looks matters the most). Most men need to use money to cheat their shitty genes.
26-02-2020 00:37
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
Xadoman wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
Can we at least all agree, we shouldn't be breeding if we can't financially afford it? I mean, come on give me that much!


If you are able to breed being homeless bum then you are facially and physically very attractive to females. Females by nature go for the best genes(looks matters the most). Most men need to use money to cheat their shitty genes.


This gene term seems stupid to me, but i'll bite. I don't give two ****s if some homeless **** or any other **** wants to "breed", but this stupid idea of "it's all about the genes of myself surviving forever" delusional ****tard ridiculousness, come on man. You can't be this stupid. The homeless man is better off not breeding with these women
26-02-2020 00:38
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
And i'm rooting for the homeless man not falling into a woman's potential trap or anyone else's. Anyway, we've gone off topic
26-02-2020 00:55
Xadoman
★★☆☆☆
(160)
This gene term seems stupid to me, but i'll bite. I don't give two ****s if some homeless **** or any other **** wants to "breed", but this stupid idea of "it's all about the genes of myself surviving forever" delusional ****tard ridiculousness, come on man. You can't be this stupid. The homeless man is better off not breeding with these women

nd i'm rooting for the homeless man not falling into a woman's potential trap or anyone else's. Anyway, we've gone off topic


I just wanted to point out how women think and behave. It is a simple biology. If you are good looking then most probably you also have good genes and have no problems to breed. Simple as that.
26-02-2020 01:41
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
Xadoman wrote:
This gene term seems stupid to me, but i'll bite. I don't give two ****s if some homeless **** or any other **** wants to "breed", but this stupid idea of "it's all about the genes of myself surviving forever" delusional ****tard ridiculousness, come on man. You can't be this stupid. The homeless man is better off not breeding with these women

nd i'm rooting for the homeless man not falling into a woman's potential trap or anyone else's. Anyway, we've gone off topic


I just wanted to point out how women think and behave. It is a simple biology. If you are good looking then most probably you also have good genes and have no problems to breed. Simple as that.


I understand how breeding works moron
26-02-2020 01:44
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
This idea that somehow passing on a gene (one of the whatever how many number), and we just continue to be stupid. The Earth itself isn't what we're saving, because make no mistake, the Earth will shake us off like fleas. NO ONE is living through this, but it's a matter of how we want to live. What in the Hell is wrong with you people, grow up kiddos
26-02-2020 01:50
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
Anyway, off topic again. My apologies. Let's move on.
26-02-2020 01:57
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
Better put, we probably all share similar genes somewhere down the line. If you actually read what I said, it's a better idea than what we're doing now, and it's not like it other people / political little agenda gayness can't figure it out too. hmmmmm (keep to your own selves and stop innermixing until things clear up), and that doesn't impede on ANYONE's rights. Stupid is as stupid does

I don't like hugs or the stupid monkey syndrome myself (and i dont mean that in a racial sense
Edited on 26-02-2020 02:00
26-02-2020 02:17
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
I'll motorboat some nice tits though
26-02-2020 02:30
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(6253)
mistytimes40 wrote:I understand how breeding works moron

Is it similar to procreation?


.


Sea level varies from place to place in the world - keepit

Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris

Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit

If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles

Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
26-02-2020 02:42
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
IBdaMann wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:I understand how breeding works moron

Is it similar to procreation?


.



ahhhh, wordplay. I see your game
26-02-2020 03:04
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(6253)
mistytimes40 wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:I understand how breeding works moron
Is it similar to procreation?
ahhhh, wordplay. I see your game

Is that, in any way, related to "I understand what you're doing"?


.


Sea level varies from place to place in the world - keepit

Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris

Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit

If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles

Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
26-02-2020 03:09
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
IBdaMann wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:I understand how breeding works moron
Is it similar to procreation?
ahhhh, wordplay. I see your game

Is that, in any way, related to "I understand what you're doing"?


.


Wordplay is like "a play on words", misconstruing what i typed. Nothing to do with you
Edited on 26-02-2020 03:10
26-02-2020 03:19
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
Not sure how stupid you are, only reason for clarifying
Edited on 26-02-2020 03:20
26-02-2020 03:27
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
A phony drift is a phony drift.
26-02-2020 05:41
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
Where's your response now weasels?
26-02-2020 06:11
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(6253)
mistytimes40 wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:I understand how breeding works moron
Is it similar to procreation?
ahhhh, wordplay. I see your game
Is that, in any way, related to "I understand what you're doing"?
Wordplay is like "a play on words", misconstruing what i typed.

That's the same as misunderstanding what you wrote, yes?


.


Sea level varies from place to place in the world - keepit

Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris

Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit

If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles

Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
26-02-2020 06:42
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
IBdaMann wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:I understand how breeding works moron
Is it similar to procreation?
ahhhh, wordplay. I see your game
Is that, in any way, related to "I understand what you're doing"?
Wordplay is like "a play on words", misconstruing what i typed.

That's the same as misunderstanding what you wrote, yes?


.


love this endless rabbit hole you seem to perpetuate. This is the intelligence? Hahaha
26-02-2020 06:48
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(6253)
mistytimes40 wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:I understand how breeding works moron
Is it similar to procreation?
ahhhh, wordplay. I see your game
Is that, in any way, related to "I understand what you're doing"?
Wordplay is like "a play on words", misconstruing what i typed.
That's the same as misunderstanding what you wrote, yes?
love this endless rabbit hole you seem to perpetuate. This is the intelligence? Hahaha

hahaha, ... like totally "the brain" right?

.


Sea level varies from place to place in the world - keepit

Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris

Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit

If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles

Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
26-02-2020 06:50
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
IBdaMann wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:I understand how breeding works moron
Is it similar to procreation?
ahhhh, wordplay. I see your game
Is that, in any way, related to "I understand what you're doing"?
Wordplay is like "a play on words", misconstruing what i typed.
That's the same as misunderstanding what you wrote, yes?
love this endless rabbit hole you seem to perpetuate. This is the intelligence? Hahaha

hahaha, ... like totally "the brain" right?


You said something actually relevant for once, but still doesnt cover you previous adbnormalities. But, damn, i wanted to end this LITTLE debate at "and we stop breeding so much" bam

.
26-02-2020 12:00
Xadoman
★★☆☆☆
(160)
The homeless man is better off not breeding with these women


If he has good genes and beautiful women throw at him all the time then I can not see a reason why he should block those women. Women want the best seed. It is perfectly natural. Other guys who have money are going to rise those kids so no problem.
26-02-2020 16:04
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(6253)
mistytimes40 wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:I understand how breeding works moron
Is it similar to procreation?
ahhhh, wordplay. I see your game
Is that, in any way, related to "I understand what you're doing"?
Wordplay is like "a play on words", misconstruing what i typed.
That's the same as misunderstanding what you wrote, yes?
love this endless rabbit hole you seem to perpetuate. This is the intelligence? Hahaha
hahaha, ... like totally "the brain" right?
But, damn, i wanted to end this LITTLE debate at "and we stop breeding so much" bam

I hear you. You want to stop it dead in its tracks, no?


.


Sea level varies from place to place in the world - keepit

Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris

Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit

If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles

Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
26-02-2020 17:14
HarveyH55
★★★★☆
(1743)
Xadoman wrote:
The homeless man is better off not breeding with these women


If he has good genes and beautiful women throw at him all the time then I can not see a reason why he should block those women. Women want the best seed. It is perfectly natural. Other guys who have money are going to rise those kids so no problem.


Women want a provider and protector. I don't think genetics matter that much to women. If women went entirely on looks, they wouldn't get that best stability, for raising children, sine they would be concerned about her mate getting lured away, by other women.
26-02-2020 17:36
James___
★★★★★
(2420)
HarveyH55 wrote:
Xadoman wrote:
The homeless man is better off not breeding with these women


If he has good genes and beautiful women throw at him all the time then I can not see a reason why he should block those women. Women want the best seed. It is perfectly natural. Other guys who have money are going to rise those kids so no problem.


Women want a provider and protector. I don't think genetics matter that much to women. If women went entirely on looks, they wouldn't get that best stability, for raising children, sine they would be concerned about her mate getting lured away, by other women.



You are so right Harvey. This is an excellent example of that.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/celebrity/katherine-johnson-nasa-scientist-hidden-figures-inspiration-dead-at-101/ar-BB10kLcO
26-02-2020 19:51
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
IBdaMann wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:I understand how breeding works moron
Is it similar to procreation?
ahhhh, wordplay. I see your game
Is that, in any way, related to "I understand what you're doing"?
Wordplay is like "a play on words", misconstruing what i typed.
That's the same as misunderstanding what you wrote, yes?
love this endless rabbit hole you seem to perpetuate. This is the intelligence? Hahaha
hahaha, ... like totally "the brain" right?
But, damn, i wanted to end this LITTLE debate at "and we stop breeding so much" bam

I hear you. You want to stop it dead in its tracks, no?


.


No, not dead in its tracks. First of all, i don't understand why anyone would want a kid right now to begin with, not only for our own sake but for the kid's sake. i wouldn't put a kid through this shithole. But hey, i'm not saying people can't have a reasonable amount of kids, but this constant showering of "look at me i can breed again like an idiot and not provide a decent life for the kids" nonsense, i dont agree with. And that goes for everyone, every country, everywhere. Has nothing to do with politics or what you're wanting to gain.

Stupid is stupid, simple as that. You give me a monkey hug all day long, but you're still just an advanced monkey, and it means nothing to me. You can thank "your God" or your fake pretentious politics. But my idea here has nothing to do with changing anything aside from slightly tweaking the birthrate (within reason and not trampling on rights), planting more foods, having more drinks and herbs ect., while all of us see ourselves to easier smarter MORE productive shithole.
26-02-2020 19:56
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
You guys say i sound like a city dweller, quite the opposite it sounds to me. Those people huddle up like complete ****ing morons, and look at em' now. But hey, we can all be just like them if we keep breeding, yay!!
Edited on 26-02-2020 19:57
26-02-2020 20:11
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
And btw, I need other people as well for things like food, ect. ect. I'm no different than anyone else, but I prefer to enjoy my company when we don't need to "pollute each other's space" I think everyone could at least agree, we enjoy our own space, our own people, and our own pets. What else could a guy ask for? But I know, another rabbit hole will surely ensue here in this thread with the next comment by someone just look to push the same putrid nonsense.
26-02-2020 20:13
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
Not sure I can make "My Idea" any clearer so perhaps i'll just let you people "debate" among yourselves.
26-02-2020 20:15
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(6253)
mistytimes40 wrote: First of all, i don't understand why anyone would want a kid right now to begin with,

Doesn't the fact that you are your own unique individual explain that? Isn't it enough to know that others want to have kids right now, whether or not you understand the "why"?

I have kids right now. They are wanted. It's great. They're great.

mistytimes40 wrote: ... not only for our own sake but for the kid's sake.

The kid can't have any "sake" until he is born.

mistytimes40 wrote: i wouldn't put a kid through this shithole.

... then get out of the shithole first. Or, you can do what I did and just never climb into any shitholes in the first place.

I thought of a novel idea. You know the saying "Know thy enemy!"? You could get to really KNOW the shithole. You could dive in head-first into the deep end. You could swim down to the bottom and feel the pressure in your ears. Once you do that, you will have a genuine appreciation for your freedom from the shithole that most people don't have. We should recognize the sacrifice of those who have swum to the bottom of the shithole so that we can enjoy the freedoms of remaining outside the shithole.


mistytimes40 wrote:But hey, i'm not saying people can't have a reasonable amount of kids, but this constant showering of "look at me i can breed again like an idiot and not provide a decent life for the kids" nonsense, i dont agree with.

I hope you realize that you just jumped rails completely onto a completely different topic just now, i.e. "unsupportive fathers" is not semantically equivalent to "life is a shithole."

mistytimes40 wrote: And that goes for everyone, every country, everywhere. Has nothing to do with politics or what you're wanting to gain.

It has to do with your sense of logic, or lack thereof.

mistytimes40 wrote: Stupid is stupid, simple as that.

I can get onboard with that.

mistytimes40 wrote: You give me a monkey hug all day long, but you're still just an advanced monkey, and it means nothing to me.

... an advanced APE, not "monkey."

mistytimes40 wrote: But my idea here has nothing to do with changing anything aside from slightly tweaking the birthrate (within reason and not trampling on rights), planting more foods, having more drinks and herbs ect., while all of us see ourselves to easier smarter MORE productive shithole.

So, are you suggesting we plant the fruit trees and the vegetables over the shitholes and cover them up?


.


Sea level varies from place to place in the world - keepit

Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris

Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit

If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles

Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
Page 1 of 4123>>>





Join the debate My Idea:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Poll:Good idea or bad idea?8510-03-2020 17:57
My Idea325-02-2020 20:26
Trump blasts the idea that people can cause climate change713-03-2019 04:10
Is this idea of climate change really Man's need for enemy?221-02-2019 22:57
Is Obama's 10 bucks per barrel oil tax a good idea?3508-02-2017 03:03
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact