Remember me
▼ Content

My Idea



Page 3 of 4<1234>
28-02-2020 15:03
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
Into the Night wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
i just can't imagine why any moron wants a whining, pooping, time burden, financial drain, woman tethering, emotional drain ect. kid around. To play "daddy role" or what? I don't get it. I'll pass and stick with a dog (and that's more than enough)

and even if i did want to be "dada", it wouldnt be in this world. To each their own i guess. i live my life, you live yours. Be a good dad if you already burdened by such a problem, but i'll pass and spare the world another

if things weren't such an overly complicated mess (which it could always be worse as was pointed out earlier by what's his name), MAYBE, and that's a big maybe. World aint never gonna be perfect, so in my heroic deed to myself and to "my potential future offspring", I'M NOT BREEDING,

GOT THAT LADIES!?


YOU don't get to decide who is allowed to have a family. You only get to decide for yourself.


This right here just shows YOU don't actually read what people type, or perhaps cannot understand it parrot. YOU took this thread to stupid town, almost just by yourself. Your endless bickering on the same talking points proves that.

Stupid town is what we're doing now. But you guys don't want to hear that, because you've already dipshitted yourself into breeding, and now must bear the burden of those responsibility, AND SO DO THE REST OF US. So until people stop being stupid, we all bear the burden of some moron "trying to pass his genes on"
28-02-2020 15:09
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
Which btw, those "genes you're passing on" would stand a better chance of survival with just a slight decrease to the birthrate. It should be encouraged (but not forced), how is that so hard to understand? But let's just see if you are actually a parrot and just say the same thing over again without acknowledgement i've won this LITTLE debate. Push up contest....
28-02-2020 16:22
James___
★★★★★
(3170)
Xadoman wrote:
What you've described, is socialism, to the extreme, where the wealthy elite, get to do as they please, at the expense of the majority of the population.


No , it is capitalism. Wealthy elite who own factories full of robots that produce everything needed simply have money to rise offspring. There probably will be some low skill jobs that need human intervention in the future but for most people( my guess for 80-90% of population) there will be no job in the future. What to do with those people? To give them simply money would not work because they would breed like rabbits ( comparable example is Africa).



Do you mean like this?
Labor-force participation has fallen steadily since the start of the recession, and years into the recovery, shows no sign of turning around. It hasn't been that low since 1977, and back then it was still common for women to be homemakers. The low labor-force participation rate got Fed watchers talking that maybe an interest rate hike in December will be too soon.

https://qz.com/516023/if-nearly-40-of-americans-arent-working-what-are-they-doing/
28-02-2020 18:03
gfm7175Profile picture★★★★☆
(1214)
Xadoman wrote:
HarveyH55 wrote:
What makes you think the socialist elite would stop at sterilization? Why not euthanasia, as well? You've already decided the vast majority of the population are useless breeders, producing more useless breeders, like rabbits. When the 'humane' society, gets too many animals, the kill them, humanely, of course. They do sterilize, each and everyone, before they are 'adopted' as well.


I have not decided anything. 80% of population has no job in the future.

You can see into the future?

Xadoman wrote:
I want to belive that the elite 20% people

Having a job does not make one "elite".

Xadoman wrote:
are humane and let others to live and pay them basic income( if they let themshelves volutarily sterilize).

No one is entitled to someone else's money.

Xadoman wrote:
The population will then quickly reduce to a level that is optimal.

So we have an overpopulation problem?? How about you "take one for the team" then?? You first, mate!

Xadoman wrote:
Money is the answer to all the problems.

Meh.

Xadoman wrote:
I think to make sterilization more appealing there should also be an initial award that is 3 times the amount of basic income in a month. This should give a little push to those who can not decide wherther to sterilize or not.
As you can see my solution is very humane compared to others that use force. I would take this deal in a heartbeat. Instead of begging for food on the street I could live my life comfortably to the end.

You are not the Procreation Czar.
28-02-2020 18:06
gfm7175Profile picture★★★★☆
(1214)
mistytimes40 wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
i just can't imagine why any moron wants a whining, pooping, time burden, financial drain, woman tethering, emotional drain ect. kid around. To play "daddy role" or what? I don't get it. I'll pass and stick with a dog (and that's more than enough)

and even if i did want to be "dada", it wouldnt be in this world. To each their own i guess. i live my life, you live yours. Be a good dad if you already burdened by such a problem, but i'll pass and spare the world another

if things weren't such an overly complicated mess (which it could always be worse as was pointed out earlier by what's his name), MAYBE, and that's a big maybe. World aint never gonna be perfect, so in my heroic deed to myself and to "my potential future offspring", I'M NOT BREEDING,

GOT THAT LADIES!?


YOU don't get to decide who is allowed to have a family. You only get to decide for yourself.


This right here just shows YOU don't actually read what people type, or perhaps cannot understand it parrot. YOU took this thread to stupid town, almost just by yourself. Your endless bickering on the same talking points proves that.

Stupid town is what we're doing now. But you guys don't want to hear that, because you've already dipshitted yourself into breeding, and now must bear the burden of those responsibility, AND SO DO THE REST OF US. So until people stop being stupid, we all bear the burden of some moron "trying to pass his genes on"

QED of your stupidity.

ALL ABOARD THE CRAZY TRAIN TO STUPID TOWN!!!!! Last call!
28-02-2020 20:59
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(13293)
mistytimes40 wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
i just can't imagine why any moron wants a whining, pooping, time burden, financial drain, woman tethering, emotional drain ect. kid around. To play "daddy role" or what? I don't get it. I'll pass and stick with a dog (and that's more than enough)

and even if i did want to be "dada", it wouldnt be in this world. To each their own i guess. i live my life, you live yours. Be a good dad if you already burdened by such a problem, but i'll pass and spare the world another

if things weren't such an overly complicated mess (which it could always be worse as was pointed out earlier by what's his name), MAYBE, and that's a big maybe. World aint never gonna be perfect, so in my heroic deed to myself and to "my potential future offspring", I'M NOT BREEDING,

GOT THAT LADIES!?


YOU don't get to decide who is allowed to have a family. You only get to decide for yourself.


This right here just shows YOU don't actually read what people type, or perhaps cannot understand it parrot. YOU took this thread to stupid town, almost just by yourself. Your endless bickering on the same talking points proves that.

Stupid town is what we're doing now. But you guys don't want to hear that, because you've already dipshitted yourself into breeding, and now must bear the burden of those responsibility, AND SO DO THE REST OF US. So until people stop being stupid, we all bear the burden of some moron "trying to pass his genes on"

YOU don't get to decide who is stupid. YOU don't get to decide if someone is 'smart enough' to breed. You are not the king.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
Edited on 28-02-2020 20:59
28-02-2020 21:00
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(13293)
mistytimes40 wrote:
Which btw, those "genes you're passing on" would stand a better chance of survival with just a slight decrease to the birthrate. It should be encouraged (but not forced), how is that so hard to understand? But let's just see if you are actually a parrot and just say the same thing over again without acknowledgement i've won this LITTLE debate. Push up contest....


People are not a liability.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
28-02-2020 21:18
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
Into the Night wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
i just can't imagine why any moron wants a whining, pooping, time burden, financial drain, woman tethering, emotional drain ect. kid around. To play "daddy role" or what? I don't get it. I'll pass and stick with a dog (and that's more than enough)

and even if i did want to be "dada", it wouldnt be in this world. To each their own i guess. i live my life, you live yours. Be a good dad if you already burdened by such a problem, but i'll pass and spare the world another

if things weren't such an overly complicated mess (which it could always be worse as was pointed out earlier by what's his name), MAYBE, and that's a big maybe. World aint never gonna be perfect, so in my heroic deed to myself and to "my potential future offspring", I'M NOT BREEDING,

GOT THAT LADIES!?


YOU don't get to decide who is allowed to have a family. You only get to decide for yourself.


This right here just shows YOU don't actually read what people type, or perhaps cannot understand it parrot. YOU took this thread to stupid town, almost just by yourself. Your endless bickering on the same talking points proves that.

Stupid town is what we're doing now. But you guys don't want to hear that, because you've already dipshitted yourself into breeding, and now must bear the burden of those responsibility, AND SO DO THE REST OF US. So until people stop being stupid, we all bear the burden of some moron "trying to pass his genes on"

YOU don't get to decide who is stupid. YOU don't get to decide if someone is 'smart enough' to breed. You are not the king.


Utilizing YOU in replace of you is quite moot, but let's play

Another parrot statement, but YOU do get to be stupid, and you do decide if you're "dumb enough" to breed". Neither are you parrot. More wordplay? Or are we done being stupid, and let's just "enjoy" what we already got?
28-02-2020 21:48
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(7464)
mistytimes40 wrote: More wordplay? Or are we done being stupid, and let's just "enjoy" what we already got?


I have great news! I already had my time-and-labor-intensive financial-sinks and it doesn't look like I'll be having any more ... ergo, I will join you in not having any more. You talked me into it.




Now can I be as stupid as I want to be?


.


A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles

Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris

Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit

If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles

Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
28-02-2020 22:09
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(13293)
mistytimes40 wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
i just can't imagine why any moron wants a whining, pooping, time burden, financial drain, woman tethering, emotional drain ect. kid around. To play "daddy role" or what? I don't get it. I'll pass and stick with a dog (and that's more than enough)

and even if i did want to be "dada", it wouldnt be in this world. To each their own i guess. i live my life, you live yours. Be a good dad if you already burdened by such a problem, but i'll pass and spare the world another

if things weren't such an overly complicated mess (which it could always be worse as was pointed out earlier by what's his name), MAYBE, and that's a big maybe. World aint never gonna be perfect, so in my heroic deed to myself and to "my potential future offspring", I'M NOT BREEDING,

GOT THAT LADIES!?


YOU don't get to decide who is allowed to have a family. You only get to decide for yourself.


This right here just shows YOU don't actually read what people type, or perhaps cannot understand it parrot. YOU took this thread to stupid town, almost just by yourself. Your endless bickering on the same talking points proves that.

Stupid town is what we're doing now. But you guys don't want to hear that, because you've already dipshitted yourself into breeding, and now must bear the burden of those responsibility, AND SO DO THE REST OF US. So until people stop being stupid, we all bear the burden of some moron "trying to pass his genes on"

YOU don't get to decide who is stupid. YOU don't get to decide if someone is 'smart enough' to breed. You are not the king.

...deleted Mantra 1...

No argument presented.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
28-02-2020 23:13
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
So the endless "push-up contest" continues, with me still doing doing that extra push-up. Ahhh
28-02-2020 23:17
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
Walkin away a winner from this LITTLE debate today
29-02-2020 00:42
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(7464)
mistytimes40 wrote: Walkin away a winner from this LITTLE debate today

Is this YOUR walk-away moment?


.


A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles

Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris

Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit

If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles

Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
29-02-2020 01:06
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(13293)
mistytimes40 wrote:...deleted Mantra 7...


No argument presented.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
29-02-2020 02:42
HarveyH55
★★★★★
(2399)
Xadoman wrote:
HarveyH55 wrote:
What makes you think the socialist elite would stop at sterilization? Why not euthanasia, as well? You've already decided the vast majority of the population are useless breeders, producing more useless breeders, like rabbits. When the 'humane' society, gets too many animals, the kill them, humanely, of course. They do sterilize, each and everyone, before they are 'adopted' as well.


I have not decided anything. 80% of population has no job in the future. I want to belive that the elite 20% people are humane and let others to live and pay them basic income( if they let themshelves volutarily sterilize).The population will then quickly reduce to a level that is optimal. Money is the answer to all the problems. I think to make sterilization more appealing there should also be an initial award that is 3 times the amount of basic income in a month. This should give a little push to those who can not decide wherther to sterilize or not.
As you can see my solution is very humane compared to others that use force. I would take this deal in a heartbeat. Instead of begging for food on the street I could live my life comfortably to the end.


Then again, you've never had to worry about a baby being made, the way you do it...

You do realize that the 'elite' don't generally live very long, when socialism starts to collapse. You won't even see 30% of the population unemployed and begging for hand outs. Hunger is a strong motivator, and people will do what ever it takes, to survive.
29-02-2020 02:59
GasGuzzlerProfile picture★★★★☆
(1790)
mistytimes40 wrote:
I would take this deal in a heartbeat. Instead of begging for food on the street I could live my life comfortably to the end.


Sure you would! May I take a crack at a translation?

"Instead of begging for food on the street, I could get paid give up my right to have what I never wanted, and then live comfortably on my neighbors dime."

Yes, a great win for you here today, shittyx40.
29-02-2020 07:28
James___
★★★★★
(3170)
GasGuzzler wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
I would take this deal in a heartbeat. Instead of begging for food on the street I could live my life comfortably to the end.


Sure you would! May I take a crack at a translation?

"Instead of begging for food on the street, I could get paid give up my right to have what I never wanted, and then live comfortably on my neighbors dime."

Yes, a great win for you here today, shittyx40.



GiGi, it's sad. Between you and Harvey, your display is simply pathetic. That's all it is, just pathetic. Both of you are nicer to me. And I think you both fück each other.
Yet you're ruder to a woman who might think that you like woman. This is too disgusting for me. I guess this is what being an American is about, right?
You like fücking another man?

J€g snäkker Engleske

Edited on 29-02-2020 07:32
29-02-2020 08:37
HarveyH55
★★★★★
(2399)
James___ wrote:
GasGuzzler wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
I would take this deal in a heartbeat. Instead of begging for food on the street I could live my life comfortably to the end.


Sure you would! May I take a crack at a translation?

"Instead of begging for food on the street, I could get paid give up my right to have what I never wanted, and then live comfortably on my neighbors dime."

Yes, a great win for you here today, shittyx40.



GiGi, it's sad. Between you and Harvey, your display is simply pathetic. That's all it is, just pathetic. Both of you are nicer to me. And I think you both fück each other.
Yet you're ruder to a woman who might think that you like woman. This is too disgusting for me. I guess this is what being an American is about, right?
You like fücking another man?

J€g snäkker Engleske


I bet you really miss being one of the 'popular' guys, on the Navy boat...
29-02-2020 08:51
James___
★★★★★
(3170)
HarveyH55 wrote:
James___ wrote:
GasGuzzler wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
I would take this deal in a heartbeat. Instead of begging for food on the street I could live my life comfortably to the end.


Sure you would! May I take a crack at a translation?

"Instead of begging for food on the street, I could get paid give up my right to have what I never wanted, and then live comfortably on my neighbors dime."

Yes, a great win for you here today, shittyx40.



GiGi, it's sad. Between you and Harvey, your display is simply pathetic. That's all it is, just pathetic. Both of you are nicer to me. And I think you both fück each other.
Yet you're ruder to a woman who might think that you like woman. This is too disgusting for me. I guess this is what being an American is about, right?
You like fücking another man?

J€g snäkker Engleske


I bet you really miss being one of the 'popular' guys, on the Navy boat...



Can't you do better than that? The Navy didn't recommend me for reenlistment because of my service connected hearing loss.
You have it going on Harvey. You can attack someone for serving your country which you love. That's a great way to show your patriotism. You love America, right? But Veterans are homosexuals.
29-02-2020 15:55
HarveyH55
★★★★★
(2399)
James___ wrote:
HarveyH55 wrote:
James___ wrote:
GasGuzzler wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
I would take this deal in a heartbeat. Instead of begging for food on the street I could live my life comfortably to the end.


Sure you would! May I take a crack at a translation?

"Instead of begging for food on the street, I could get paid give up my right to have what I never wanted, and then live comfortably on my neighbors dime."

Yes, a great win for you here today, shittyx40.



GiGi, it's sad. Between you and Harvey, your display is simply pathetic. That's all it is, just pathetic. Both of you are nicer to me. And I think you both fück each other.
Yet you're ruder to a woman who might think that you like woman. This is too disgusting for me. I guess this is what being an American is about, right?
You like fücking another man?

J€g snäkker Engleske


I bet you really miss being one of the 'popular' guys, on the Navy boat...



Can't you do better than that? The Navy didn't recommend me for reenlistment because of my service connected hearing loss.
You have it going on Harvey. You can attack someone for serving your country which you love. That's a great way to show your patriotism. You love America, right? But Veterans are homosexuals.


Not much of patriotic American veteran, insulting Americans. You brought up the homosexual crap, and I know it's not me. Never met any of the others, so it's all in your head. You think about homosexuality a lot, a closet case. The Navy couldn't refuse you for being gay, so they went with the next best thing. We all have some degree of hearing loss, it your choice to call it a disability. Even if you were completely deaf, wouldn't make you disabled. Which is why I tend to believe, that you are a weak-willed, homosexual, a defeatist. You blame everyone, and everything, for you own failures and short-comings.
29-02-2020 16:50
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
In a perfect world, there wouldn't be "some moron who thinks his genes are superior to every else's"

I know, you'll label this "socialism", because that's your buzzword talking parrot point, because YOU want to "be Mr. hero, Mr. Survivor, Mr. My genes are superior to every else's). That's not to say, we've had true Heroes in the past / present (and they should be greatly commended for that).

We need heroes to continue helping others, but competition for this "gene pool" thing is clearly what we're getting wrong. Yes, we need security, yes we need to secure our borders, yes yes yes, but our resources will not hold out for those future generations.

I get it, socialism doesn't work when you have an "elite" leader running everything. Everyone wants to be that guy, i mean let's just be honest, but in a perfect world (at least perfected), we wouldn't have / encourage "Leaders" and worship the ground they walk on. I'd like to believe we can lead our own lives, with more space, in relative peace without trampling on the rights of others. Are we that stupid as a species to not see that? Because like I've said, presently, I wouldn't bring a child into this shithole the way things are. While we may have one of the better shitholes, it's still not an optimal shithole. And I think other countries could agree. WE THE PEOPLE ARE IN CHARGE, not some **** who thinks he can run all of us.

Our forefathers knew that and fought for it.
29-02-2020 16:51
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
We'd still be under the Queen's rule if it weren't for our FORWARD thinking forefathers.
29-02-2020 17:15
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
There's no reason any child, man, woman whomever should be starving or hungry. Food should be plentiful. It's these elitist ****s who could give two ****s about others who continue their game, while everyone else seemingly falls in line with them.

Again, let's be honest, we all wanna be that guy pulling all women. And hey, i've got no problem with that, but YOU don't get to be in charge of everyone else and YOU don't get to continue being a moron and overpopulating, because YOU and the rest of us cannot sustain that stupidity
Edited on 29-02-2020 17:17
29-02-2020 17:21
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
And all's it would take is for people to just have less children and the "future survival" of those children will not only be simpler, but more likely. Duh.
29-02-2020 17:24
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
Instead of spending our time bickering and "passing genes on", we should be spending our time figuring out how to find other Worlds, and flying off this bitch one day when the Sun burns out (and drinking, smoking, and enjoying what we got while we got it in relative peace)
Edited on 29-02-2020 17:26
29-02-2020 21:16
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(7464)
mistytimes40 wrote:Instead of spending our time bickering and "passing genes on", we should be spending our time figuring out how to find other Worlds, and flying off this bitch one day when the Sun burns out (and drinking, smoking, and enjoying what we got while we got it in relative peace)


Wait! Wait, wait, wait, wait wait .......


Who exactly will be flying off this bitch if we stop having kids?


.


A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles

Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris

Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit

If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles

Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
29-02-2020 23:19
HarveyH55
★★★★★
(2399)
mistytimes40 wrote:
There's no reason any child, man, woman whomever should be starving or hungry. Food should be plentiful. It's these elitist ****s who could give two ****s about others who continue their game, while everyone else seemingly falls in line with them.

Again, let's be honest, we all wanna be that guy pulling all women. And hey, i've got no problem with that, but YOU don't get to be in charge of everyone else and YOU don't get to continue being a moron and overpopulating, because YOU and the rest of us cannot sustain that stupidity


Seems to me, if people got jobs, they would have less time and energy to breed. You think? They wouldn't go hungry. Food is plentiful, either you get a job, earn money, by food. You find a piece of ground, plant seeds, and tend it. Or your go trudging around in the wild, murdering wildlife, and ripping up plants to eat. Life is work, on way or another, so is raising kids. Some people are lazy, and basically worthless, waiting for there food stamp allotment, and laughing at us poor fools, not to weak and afraid to do the work. Socialism is the pipe dream, of dope smoking sissys...
01-03-2020 00:36
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
HarveyH55 wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
There's no reason any child, man, woman whomever should be starving or hungry. Food should be plentiful. It's these elitist ****s who could give two ****s about others who continue their game, while everyone else seemingly falls in line with them.

Again, let's be honest, we all wanna be that guy pulling all women. And hey, i've got no problem with that, but YOU don't get to be in charge of everyone else and YOU don't get to continue being a moron and overpopulating, because YOU and the rest of us cannot sustain that stupidity


Seems to me, if people got jobs, they would have less time and energy to breed. You think? They wouldn't go hungry. Food is plentiful, either you get a job, earn money, by food. You find a piece of ground, plant seeds, and tend it. Or your go trudging around in the wild, murdering wildlife, and ripping up plants to eat. Life is work, on way or another, so is raising kids. Some people are lazy, and basically worthless, waiting for there food stamp allotment, and laughing at us poor fools, not to weak and afraid to do the work. Socialism is the pipe dream, of dope smoking sissys...



Knew i'd see that "socialism" buzzword. MistyTimes40 now for sure walks away a winner, because the arguments of others have failed. Ahhhhhh
01-03-2020 02:28
Xadoman
★★☆☆☆
(280)
Some people are lazy, and basically worthless, waiting for there food stamp allotment, and laughing at us poor fools, not to weak and afraid to do the work. Socialism is the pipe dream, of dope smoking sissys...


You seem to be an old school guy. Life has changed a lot. There is a hugh amount( ca 80%) of young guys who can not have girlfriend nowadays because women only want top 20% of guys. Women can be picky these days because they can earn pretty good money by themshelves nowadays. I have been to a lot of forums where those young guys are gathering and I know a lot about this problem. Those guys have no motivation to work. They have nothing to work for. Some guys completely lose their mind and go and shoot up some school or smth. Those guys are angry at woman because women reject them because of their looks. I understant those guys very well but I also understand women. From female s perspective only very small amount of males are physically attractive( about 5%). It is nature, they can not fight with it.
01-03-2020 06:20
HarveyH55
★★★★★
(2399)
Xadoman wrote:
Some people are lazy, and basically worthless, waiting for there food stamp allotment, and laughing at us poor fools, not to weak and afraid to do the work. Socialism is the pipe dream, of dope smoking sissys...


You seem to be an old school guy. Life has changed a lot. There is a hugh amount( ca 80%) of young guys who can not have girlfriend nowadays because women only want top 20% of guys. Women can be picky these days because they can earn pretty good money by themshelves nowadays. I have been to a lot of forums where those young guys are gathering and I know a lot about this problem. Those guys have no motivation to work. They have nothing to work for. Some guys completely lose their mind and go and shoot up some school or smth. Those guys are angry at woman because women reject them because of their looks. I understant those guys very well but I also understand women. From female s perspective only very small amount of males are physically attractive( about 5%). It is nature, they can not fight with it.


Women really want a good provider, and protector. They don't want to marry a child, they want to have children. Looks, even sexual performance, aren't major concerns. Any guy with a steady, stable job, a place to live, and his own transportation, seldom has trouble finding a date.
01-03-2020 12:49
Xadoman
★★☆☆☆
(280)
Women really want a good provider, and protector. They don't want to marry a child, they want to have children. Looks, even sexual performance, aren't major concerns. Any guy with a steady, stable job, a place to live, and his own transportation, seldom has trouble finding a date.


This could be true 50 years ago but nowadays as I said things have changed. Women earn their own money. They do not need a provider any more. Many post wall women( around the age 35 ) will settle but I have a feeling that soon even those ladies will not settle anymore. If you do not belive me then go to some forums where those guys are gathering and see it for yourself how bad things are nowadays. Some go and shoot up a school or smth( it is called "going ER "- by the name of Elliot Roger who shoot up the shcool).
01-03-2020 17:41
HarveyH55
★★★★★
(2399)
Xadoman wrote:
Women really want a good provider, and protector. They don't want to marry a child, they want to have children. Looks, even sexual performance, aren't major concerns. Any guy with a steady, stable job, a place to live, and his own transportation, seldom has trouble finding a date.


This could be true 50 years ago but nowadays as I said things have changed. Women earn their own money. They do not need a provider any more. Many post wall women( around the age 35 ) will settle but I have a feeling that soon even those ladies will not settle anymore. If you do not belive me then go to some forums where those guys are gathering and see it for yourself how bad things are nowadays. Some go and shoot up a school or smth( it is called "going ER "- by the name of Elliot Roger who shoot up the shcool).


It really hasn't change all that much. Women have aren't as desperate, or in such a hurry to find a mate. They can afford to be more selective, and men need to work to prove their worth. Sweet talking, a few drinks, and an unplanned pregnancy doesn't cut it anymore. Woman can afford to raise children, without getting married. Child support is mandatory. The only thing that has really changed, is that the men, who chose not to work serious jobs, or at all, can't afford to be picky about the women the get. They have to settle with something less, than women that look like the ones in there porn movie dreams. Most men aren't willing to take on the traditional role, that women filled, when it was the man who earned the family income. They don't want to do domestic chores, raise the kids. They expect the woman to still do all those things. Basically, they can't find a wife, because they are useless bums, thinking they are entitled to be taken care of their entire lives. Should just keep living with their parents. Life is hard work, and you get back, only as much as you are willing to put into it.
01-03-2020 18:13
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
I'm still amazed at the level of "moronism" any man would have to be to be mating anyway. Thinking through all the garbage we have to go through in life, then, the death process... The only pipe dream i see is one with a bunch of monkeys (or Apes or whatever and not in a racial sense) huddling around, scratching their butts, driving around in their loud trucks and each of them thinking they the king monkey. Stupid is as stupid does.

I'll consider "mating" when people get their shit together, until, i prefer keep my genes off this bitch. Ahhhh, did that extra push-up, in this little push-up contest

Edited on 01-03-2020 18:16
01-03-2020 18:15
Xadoman
★★☆☆☆
(280)
It really hasn't change all that much.


It is a completely new world out there. Women choose their date from smartphone swiping left from hundreds and hundreds of desperate man. Average man has no hope in this game. He gets zero matches. His only option is going to prostitute. Beliveing that there is a match for everyone is communism.


The only thing that has really changed, is that the men, who chose not to work serious jobs, or at all, can't afford to be picky about the women the get.


Belive me , those guys would be completely happy with their looksmatch or even several points lower but women hypergamy in these days is so out of it that even deformed women with physical disability could land a high tier normie( 7 out of 10). Average male has no hope on this game.

Basically, they can't find a wife, because they are useless bums, thinking they are entitled to be taken care of their entire lives.


Many of those guys work in stem and have a lot of money. But they can not have a girlfriend because of their looks.


We can not compare the world today with the world 50 years ago. A lot has changed and it will continue to get worse day by day. In Japan men commit suicide left and right because they can not breed with woman. Those guys in Japan are not bums. They simply have no point to live in this society.
Edited on 01-03-2020 18:17
01-03-2020 18:24
Xadoman
★★☆☆☆
(280)
mistytimes40 wrote:
I'm still amazed at the level of "moronism" any man would have to be to be mating anyway. Thinking through all the garbage we have to go through in life, then, the death process... The only pipe dream i see is one with a bunch of monkeys (or Apes or whatever and not in a racial sense) huddling around, scratching their butts, driving around in their loud trucks and each of them thinking they the king monkey. Stupid is as stupid does.

I'll consider "mating" when people get their shit together, until, i prefer keep my genes off this bitch. Ahhhh, did that extra push-up, in this little push-up contest


Do not bite the hand that feeds you. Those apes are going to support your lifestyle in retirement.
01-03-2020 18:24
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
Not to mention, women, a lot of times, will take a man for everything he's got once she "breeds", then moves off with her new boyfriend. A woman can find 100 guys in one day, easy.

All that work for NOTHING (or worse), Smh..... no thanks.

Edited on 01-03-2020 18:26
01-03-2020 18:26
James___
★★★★★
(3170)
Xadoman wrote:
Some people are lazy, and basically worthless, waiting for there food stamp allotment, and laughing at us poor fools, not to weak and afraid to do the work. Socialism is the pipe dream, of dope smoking sissys...


You seem to be an old school guy. Life has changed a lot. There is a hugh amount( ca 80%) of young guys who can not have girlfriend nowadays because women only want top 20% of guys. Women can be picky these days because they can earn pretty good money by themshelves nowadays. I have been to a lot of forums where those young guys are gathering and I know a lot about this problem. Those guys have no motivation to work. They have nothing to work for. Some guys completely lose their mind and go and shoot up some school or smth. Those guys are angry at woman because women reject them because of their looks. I understant those guys very well but I also understand women. From female s perspective only very small amount of males are physically attractive( about 5%). It is nature, they can not fight with it.



Anymore it's common for people not to get married. Some of the issues are the problems created by a bad relationship. With marriage comes divorce which can be just as expensive.
Money does create independence. During the Great Recession of 2008 the divorce rate dropped. Couples needed each other. Monogamy often times isn't something a person wants. I remember when the website AshleyMadison got hacked. I think what many people didn't realize was that there were websites for cheating and on the web page, that fact was openly advertised. Of course, the number of members (32 million) might've been surprising as well. https://www.wired.com/2015/08/happened-hackers-posted-stolen-ashley-madison-data/
Also work can be demanding. Stress from work can kill the "mood" either in intimacy or meeting someone. People that make less money typically have more children.
And today there is information overload. One of the things that really surprised me was when I lived in Phoenix, Az. What was surprising was the number of attractive women playing slot machines by themselves. Any number of reasons could explain that. And they range anywhere from being raised as daddy's little Princess to guys are afraid of being rejected and prefer playing it safe.
Basically, the pace of life is faster today and people do get caught up in it.
01-03-2020 18:28
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
Xadoman wrote:
mistytimes40 wrote:
I'm still amazed at the level of "moronism" any man would have to be to be mating anyway. Thinking through all the garbage we have to go through in life, then, the death process... The only pipe dream i see is one with a bunch of monkeys (or Apes or whatever and not in a racial sense) huddling around, scratching their butts, driving around in their loud trucks and each of them thinking they the king monkey. Stupid is as stupid does.

I'll consider "mating" when people get their shit together, until, i prefer keep my genes off this bitch. Ahhhh, did that extra push-up, in this little push-up contest


Do not bite the hand that feeds you. Those apes are going to support your lifestyle in retirement.


Fair enough. However, if you've been keeping up with the thread, it's about all of us reducing our "breeding" to provide a better retirement for ALL OF US.

Enjoy that retirement when you're in an overpopulated nursing home getting pushed around by a fat wife (if she hasn't left you for another man) in your wheelchair? And that's if you're lucky enough to be able to afford the nursing home after she takes you for all you got with her new "fresh squeeze". To each their own i guess....
Edited on 01-03-2020 18:33
01-03-2020 18:48
mistytimes40
★☆☆☆☆
(76)
I'm no different than any other guy, want all that pussy, but i've figured out to WEAR A CONDOM
01-03-2020 18:52
Xadoman
★★☆☆☆
(280)
mistytimes40 wrote:
I'm no different than any other guy, want all that pussy, but i've figured out to WEAR A CONDOM


Instead of playing with condoms why do not you go to dr Snip?
Page 3 of 4<1234>





Join the debate My Idea:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Poll:Good idea or bad idea?8510-03-2020 17:57
My Idea325-02-2020 20:26
Trump blasts the idea that people can cause climate change713-03-2019 04:10
Is this idea of climate change really Man's need for enemy?221-02-2019 22:57
Is Obama's 10 bucks per barrel oil tax a good idea?3508-02-2017 03:03
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact