Tell your old college professors to check out climate-debate.com for biogeochemistry

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
LOL so only schizzo's like you are allowed to define words. So again take your Chlorpromazine now please

Psychoquackery. I did not define 'amphibian'. Hallucination. The word has a specific meaning, is French in origin, and appeared in the English lexicon around 1610. I have already given you the eytomology of the word. RQAA.

ALLIGATOR

Kingdom Animalia – Animal, animaux, animals
Subkingdom Bilateria
Infrakingdom Deuterostomia
Phylum Chordata – cordés, cordado, chordates
Subphylum Vertebrata – vertebrado, vertébrés, vertebrates
Infraphylum Gnathostomata
Superclass Tetrapoda
Class Reptilia Laurenti, 1768 – répteis, reptiles, Reptiles
Order Crocodilia – crocodilo, jacaré, Crocodilians, crocodiles, alligators, caimans, gavials
Family Alligatoridae – Caimans, Alligators
Genus Alligator Cuvier, 1807 – Alligators
Direct Children:
Species Alligator mississippiensis (Daudin, 1802) – American Alligator, Aligator americano, Alligator, Gator, Florida Alligator, Mississippi Alligator, Louisiana Alligator
Species Alligator sinensis Fauvel, 1879 – Chinese Alligator, Yangtze Alligator, Yow Lung, T'o

Yawning at the sociopath troll who denies reality in favor of the little friends he keeps in his mind

What has trying to say an alligator is not an amphibian have to do with your little friends you keep in your mind?

An alligator lives in the water. It also lives on the land. It is an amphibian. The problem that YOU don't know the meaning of this word is YOUR problem. I have already described it's etymology twice to you now.

Like usual for you, you also don't seem to know the meaning of 'sociopath', 'troll', 'reality', or 'climate change'.

Speaking Liberal here won't help you. Words in English have meaning. Words in Liberal do not. You apparently know very little English (or French) for that matter.

All alligators are classified as reptiles, just the way it is kid.

Swan wrote:
However a sociopath troll

Swan wrote:
like you that takes commands from the Zohan

Swan wrote:
are free to believe otherwise.

Swan wrote:
Just take your Abilify on time

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
LOL so only schizzo's like you are allowed to define words. So again take your Chlorpromazine now please

Psychoquackery. I did not define 'amphibian'. Hallucination. The word has a specific meaning, is French in origin, and appeared in the English lexicon around 1610. I have already given you the eytomology of the word. RQAA.

ALLIGATOR

Kingdom Animalia – Animal, animaux, animals
Subkingdom Bilateria
Infrakingdom Deuterostomia
Phylum Chordata – cordés, cordado, chordates
Subphylum Vertebrata – vertebrado, vertébrés, vertebrates
Infraphylum Gnathostomata
Superclass Tetrapoda
Class Reptilia Laurenti, 1768 – répteis, reptiles, Reptiles
Order Crocodilia – crocodilo, jacaré, Crocodilians, crocodiles, alligators, caimans, gavials
Family Alligatoridae – Caimans, Alligators
Genus Alligator Cuvier, 1807 – Alligators
Direct Children:
Species Alligator mississippiensis (Daudin, 1802) – American Alligator, Aligator americano, Alligator, Gator, Florida Alligator, Mississippi Alligator, Louisiana Alligator
Species Alligator sinensis Fauvel, 1879 – Chinese Alligator, Yangtze Alligator, Yow Lung, T'o

Yawning at the sociopath troll who denies reality in favor of the little friends he keeps in his mind

What has trying to say an alligator is not an amphibian have to do with your little friends you keep in your mind?

An alligator lives in the water. It also lives on the land. It is an amphibian. The problem that YOU don't know the meaning of this word is YOUR problem. I have already described it's etymology twice to you now.

Like usual for you, you also don't seem to know the meaning of 'sociopath', 'troll', 'reality', or 'climate change'.

Speaking Liberal here won't help you. Words in English have meaning. Words in Liberal do not. You apparently know very little English (or French) for that matter.

All alligators are classified as reptiles, just the way it is kid.

So you agree with me. Alligators are reptiles.
They also happen to be amphibians.

Swan wrote:
However a sociopath troll

You keep using these words. They don't mean what you think they mean. You are actually describing yourself with the use of the word 'troll'. Inversion fallacy. There are no sociopaths here as far as I know.

Swan wrote:
like you that takes commands from the Zohan

Who is Zohan?? Is this another one of your imaginary friends?

Swan wrote:
are free to believe otherwise.

I am free to believe as I wish, just as you are.

Swan wrote:
Just take your Abilify on time

Who is Abilify?? Is this another of your imaginary friends?

Your hallucination problem has gotten a lot worse.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
LOL so only schizzo's like you are allowed to define words. So again take your Chlorpromazine now please

Psychoquackery. I did not define 'amphibian'. Hallucination. The word has a specific meaning, is French in origin, and appeared in the English lexicon around 1610. I have already given you the eytomology of the word. RQAA.

ALLIGATOR

Kingdom Animalia – Animal, animaux, animals
Subkingdom Bilateria
Infrakingdom Deuterostomia
Phylum Chordata – cordés, cordado, chordates
Subphylum Vertebrata – vertebrado, vertébrés, vertebrates
Infraphylum Gnathostomata
Superclass Tetrapoda
Class Reptilia Laurenti, 1768 – répteis, reptiles, Reptiles
Order Crocodilia – crocodilo, jacaré, Crocodilians, crocodiles, alligators, caimans, gavials
Family Alligatoridae – Caimans, Alligators
Genus Alligator Cuvier, 1807 – Alligators
Direct Children:
Species Alligator mississippiensis (Daudin, 1802) – American Alligator, Aligator americano, Alligator, Gator, Florida Alligator, Mississippi Alligator, Louisiana Alligator
Species Alligator sinensis Fauvel, 1879 – Chinese Alligator, Yangtze Alligator, Yow Lung, T'o

Yawning at the sociopath troll who denies reality in favor of the little friends he keeps in his mind

What has trying to say an alligator is not an amphibian have to do with your little friends you keep in your mind?

An alligator lives in the water. It also lives on the land. It is an amphibian. The problem that YOU don't know the meaning of this word is YOUR problem. I have already described it's etymology twice to you now.

Like usual for you, you also don't seem to know the meaning of 'sociopath', 'troll', 'reality', or 'climate change'.

Speaking Liberal here won't help you. Words in English have meaning. Words in Liberal do not. You apparently know very little English (or French) for that matter.

All alligators are classified as reptiles, just the way it is kid.

So you agree with me. Alligators are reptiles.
They also happen to be amphibians.

Swan wrote:
However a sociopath troll

You keep using these words. They don't mean what you think they mean. You are actually describing yourself with the use of the word 'troll'. Inversion fallacy. There are no sociopaths here as far as I know.

Swan wrote:
like you that takes commands from the Zohan

Who is Zohan?? Is this another one of your imaginary friends?

Swan wrote:
are free to believe otherwise.

I am free to believe as I wish, just as you are.

Swan wrote:
Just take your Abilify on time

Who is Abilify?? Is this another of your imaginary friends?

Your hallucination problem has gotten a lot worse.

Abilify is one of the prescriptions that you clearly do not take because you enjoy being confused

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
LOL so only schizzo's like you are allowed to define words. So again take your Chlorpromazine now please

Psychoquackery. I did not define 'amphibian'. Hallucination. The word has a specific meaning, is French in origin, and appeared in the English lexicon around 1610. I have already given you the eytomology of the word. RQAA.

ALLIGATOR

Kingdom Animalia – Animal, animaux, animals
Subkingdom Bilateria
Infrakingdom Deuterostomia
Phylum Chordata – cordés, cordado, chordates
Subphylum Vertebrata – vertebrado, vertébrés, vertebrates
Infraphylum Gnathostomata
Superclass Tetrapoda
Class Reptilia Laurenti, 1768 – répteis, reptiles, Reptiles
Order Crocodilia – crocodilo, jacaré, Crocodilians, crocodiles, alligators, caimans, gavials
Family Alligatoridae – Caimans, Alligators
Genus Alligator Cuvier, 1807 – Alligators
Direct Children:
Species Alligator mississippiensis (Daudin, 1802) – American Alligator, Aligator americano, Alligator, Gator, Florida Alligator, Mississippi Alligator, Louisiana Alligator
Species Alligator sinensis Fauvel, 1879 – Chinese Alligator, Yangtze Alligator, Yow Lung, T'o

Yawning at the sociopath troll who denies reality in favor of the little friends he keeps in his mind

What has trying to say an alligator is not an amphibian have to do with your little friends you keep in your mind?

An alligator lives in the water. It also lives on the land. It is an amphibian. The problem that YOU don't know the meaning of this word is YOUR problem. I have already described it's etymology twice to you now.

Like usual for you, you also don't seem to know the meaning of 'sociopath', 'troll', 'reality', or 'climate change'.

Speaking Liberal here won't help you. Words in English have meaning. Words in Liberal do not. You apparently know very little English (or French) for that matter.

All alligators are classified as reptiles, just the way it is kid.

So you agree with me. Alligators are reptiles.
They also happen to be amphibians.

Swan wrote:
However a sociopath troll

You keep using these words. They don't mean what you think they mean. You are actually describing yourself with the use of the word 'troll'. Inversion fallacy. There are no sociopaths here as far as I know.

Swan wrote:
like you that takes commands from the Zohan

Who is Zohan?? Is this another one of your imaginary friends?

Swan wrote:
are free to believe otherwise.

I am free to believe as I wish, just as you are.

Swan wrote:
Just take your Abilify on time

Who is Abilify?? Is this another of your imaginary friends?

Your hallucination problem has gotten a lot worse.

Abilify is one of the prescriptions that you clearly do not take because you enjoy being confused

I'm not confused. You seem to be though. It is YOU that is imaging all sorts of people to talk to. It is YOU that can't seem to speak English.

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:All alligators are classified as reptiles, just the way it is kid.

So you were in total agreement with Into the Night this whole time. Why did you pretend that you disagreed?

And you also agree with Into the Night that alligators are amphibious, right? You do, don't you? Total agreement.

Wow. I must have misread your posts. I thought there was some sort of disagreement on your part, but I guess I was mistaken.

.

Swan wrote:
I like retards which is why I like you

Actually Mr. Dahmer nothing that you can babble here will make an alligator into an amphibian because alligators are reptiles.

Are alligators amphibians?
Alligators are not amphibians. Instead, they are reptiles. Examples of animals that are amphibians include frogs, toads, salamanders, and newts. Amphibians have a complex life cycle, and they spend time on both land and in water. The skin of an amphibian needs to stay moist at all times because this is how they absorb oxygen.

On the other hand, the skin on reptiles is scaly and dry, and reptiles breathe through their lungs instead of through their skin. Other reptiles are crocodiles, lizards, snakes, and turtles.

However you are free to babble until the day you die and it seems that you will be doing just that

https://untamedanimals.com/are-alligators-amphibians/

sealover wrote:
Amphibians with both lungs and skin to breathe.

Like other amphibians, frogs can absorb oxygen through their skin.

Frogs DO have lungs. Sometime you can see their little nostrils just above the water line and their eyes above the surface, their body expanding and contracting as they breathe. When they croak, they use air from their lungs to do it.

Frogs can dive to the bottom and stay down a long time without breathing.

If the water is well aerated, they can get enough oxygen through their skin.

If they have to hibernate on land, and its better not to keep shape shifting in order to breathe, they can get atmospheric oxygen through their skin.

sealover wrote:
Amphibians with both lungs and skin to breathe.

Like other amphibians, frogs can absorb oxygen through their skin.

Frogs DO have lungs. Sometime you can see their little nostrils just above the water line and their eyes above the surface, their body expanding and contracting as they breathe. When they croak, they use air from their lungs to do it.

Frogs can dive to the bottom and stay down a long time without breathing.

If the water is well aerated, they can get enough oxygen through their skin.

If they have to hibernate on land, and its better not to keep shape shifting in order to breathe, they can get atmospheric oxygen through their skin.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Swan wrote:
I like retards which is why I like you

Actually Mr. Dahmer nothing that you can babble here will make an alligator into an amphibian because alligators are reptiles.

Are alligators amphibians?
Alligators are not amphibians. Instead, they are reptiles. Examples of animals that are amphibians include frogs, toads, salamanders, and newts. Amphibians have a complex life cycle, and they spend time on both land and in water. The skin of an amphibian needs to stay moist at all times because this is how they absorb oxygen.

On the other hand, the skin on reptiles is scaly and dry, and reptiles breathe through their lungs instead of through their skin. Other reptiles are crocodiles, lizards, snakes, and turtles.

However you are free to babble until the day you die and it seems that you will be doing just that

https://untamedanimals.com/are-alligators-amphibians/

Swan wrote:However alligators can not breath thru their skin ...

Swan wrote: and alligators are reptiles.

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:However alligators can not breath thru their skin ...

... which is how you know alligators are not amphibious.

Genius. Sheer genius.

Swan wrote: and alligators are reptiles.

... and reptiles cannot be amphibious.

Genius. Sheer genius.

If only we could harness your genius, we could make toast! I pray that you use your superpowers for good and not for evil.

Swan wrote:LOL actually [when I was EVADING your question] I said that reptiles are not amphibians,

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

I'm not confused. You seem to be though. It is YOU that is imaging all sorts of people to talk to. It is YOU that can't seem to speak English.

Actually a reptile can not be an amphibian, though a reptile can be amphibious.

Swan wrote:
One reason that a reptile can not be an amphibian is because amphibians breath thru their skin and reptiles breath with lungs.

Swan wrote:
Your IQ scale does not allow you to discern the difference between amphibious and amphibian.

130 vs 85

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:LOL actually [when I was EVADING your question] I said that reptiles are not amphibians,

Totally irrelevant. MY question was whether you ever learned that alligators are amphibious, and you are afraid to admit that you never actually went to any school.

I get it.

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:All alligators are classified as reptiles, just the way it is kid.

So you were in total agreement with Into the Night this whole time. Why did you pretend that you disagreed?

And you also agree with Into the Night that alligators are amphibious, right? You do, don't you? Total agreement.

Wow. I must have misread your posts. I thought there was some sort of disagreement on your part, but I guess I was mistaken.

.

I do not agree with idiots that believe that alligators are amphibians because I know that alligators are all reptiles. Linguistics is a complicated issue, just ask the Russians in Connecticut

CIAO

But you keep trying, as it's quite amusing

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:LOL actually [when I was EVADING your question] I said that reptiles are not amphibians,

Totally irrelevant. MY question was whether you ever learned that alligators are amphibious, and you are afraid to admit that you never actually went to any school.

I get it.

Swan wrote:

sealover wrote:
Amphibians with both lungs and skin to breathe.

Like other amphibians, frogs can absorb oxygen through their skin.

Frogs DO have lungs. Sometime you can see their little nostrils just above the water line and their eyes above the surface, their body expanding and contracting as they breathe. When they croak, they use air from their lungs to do it.

Frogs can dive to the bottom and stay down a long time without breathing.

If the water is well aerated, they can get enough oxygen through their skin.

If they have to hibernate on land, and its better not to keep shape shifting in order to breathe, they can get atmospheric oxygen through their skin.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Swan wrote:
I like retards which is why I like you

Actually Mr. Dahmer nothing that you can babble here will make an alligator into an amphibian because alligators are reptiles.

Are alligators amphibians?
Alligators are not amphibians. Instead, they are reptiles. Examples of animals that are amphibians include frogs, toads, salamanders, and newts. Amphibians have a complex life cycle, and they spend time on both land and in water. The skin of an amphibian needs to stay moist at all times because this is how they absorb oxygen.

On the other hand, the skin on reptiles is scaly and dry, and reptiles breathe through their lungs instead of through their skin. Other reptiles are crocodiles, lizards, snakes, and turtles.

However you are free to babble until the day you die and it seems that you will be doing just that

https://untamedanimals.com/are-alligators-amphibians/

However alligators can not breath thru their skin like an amphibian because reptiles are not amphibians and alligators are reptiles.
They are also amphibians. False dichotomy fallacy.

LOL you sure are doing a great job confusing yourself like a good government mule should be doing.

Keep up the good failures

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:LOL actually [when I was EVADING your question] I said that reptiles are not amphibians,

Totally irrelevant. MY question was whether you ever learned that alligators are amphibious, and you are afraid to admit that you never actually went to any school.

I get it.

Actually you are the idiot who refuses to admit and can not understand that all amphibians are amphibious but that not everything that is amphibious is an amphibian.

But you keep on babbling because you are the sap sucker on a government payroll.

Silly

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:LOL actually [when I was EVADING your question] I said that reptiles are not amphibians,

Totally irrelevant. MY question was whether you ever learned that alligators are amphibious, and you are afraid to admit that you never actually went to any school.

I get it.

Actually you are the idiot who refuses to admit and can not understand that all amphibians are amphibious but that not everything that is amphibious is an amphibian.

But you keep on babbling because you are the sap sucker on a government payroll.

Silly

Everything that is amphibious is an amphibian. Semantics fallacy. Insult fallacy. Hallucination. No argument presented.

Swan wrote:Alligators are reptiles,

Swan wrote:not amphibians.

Swan wrote: Using the same logic the AAV7 Amphibious Assault Vehicle is also amphibious but not an amphibian.

duncan61 wrote:Swan has you 2 against the wall.

duncan61 wrote:If I go swimming am I now an amphibian and not a mammal

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Alligators are reptiles,

Did you just learn this? It's what several people have been trying to tell you, but apparently you are a little slow on the uptake.

Swan wrote:not amphibians.

That's what we are trying to determine. We can jump directly to the correct answer by asking if alligators are amphibious.

Are they?

Swan wrote: Using the same logic the AAV7 Amphibious Assault Vehicle is also amphibious but not an amphibian.

When discussing vehicles and not animals, yes, an amphibious vehicle is an amphibian. Don't you speak English? An amphibian is one that is amphibious. Did you never learn that subject-adjective relationship? All nouns that have the "amphibious" modifier are amphibians.

Wait, maybe English wasn't your first language and I'm being unfair. At what age did you migrate to an English speaking country?

Don't worry, we'll walk you through this.

Baby steps.

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Alligators are reptiles,

Did you just learn this? It's what several people have been trying to tell you, but apparently you are a little slow on the uptake.

Swan wrote:not amphibians.

That's what we are trying to determine. We can jump directly to the correct answer by asking if alligators are amphibious.

Are they?

Swan wrote: Using the same logic the AAV7 Amphibious Assault Vehicle is also amphibious but not an amphibian.

When discussing vehicles and not animals, yes, an amphibious vehicle is an amphibian. Don't you speak English? An amphibian is one that is amphibious. Did you never learn that subject-adjective relationship? All nouns that have the "amphibious" modifier are amphibians.

Wait, maybe English wasn't your first language and I'm being unfair. At what age did you migrate to an English speaking country?

Don't worry, we'll walk you through this.

Baby steps.

It's ok as I am accepting your defeat as you now admit that alligators are reptiles now as I have always claimed, and obviously a reptile can not be an amphibian,

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Alligators are reptiles,

Did you just learn this? It's what several people have been trying to tell you, but apparently you are a little slow on the uptake.

Swan wrote:not amphibians.

That's what we are trying to determine. We can jump directly to the correct answer by asking if alligators are amphibious.

Are they?

Swan wrote: Using the same logic the AAV7 Amphibious Assault Vehicle is also amphibious but not an amphibian.

When discussing vehicles and not animals, yes, an amphibious vehicle is an amphibian. Don't you speak English? An amphibian is one that is amphibious. Did you never learn that subject-adjective relationship? All nouns that have the "amphibious" modifier are amphibians.

Wait, maybe English wasn't your first language and I'm being unfair. At what age did you migrate to an English speaking country?

Don't worry, we'll walk you through this.

Baby steps.

It's ok as I am accepting your defeat as you now admit that alligators are reptiles now as I have always claimed, and obviously a reptile can not be an amphibian,

False dichotomy fallacy. Many reptiles are amphibians.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Alligators are reptiles,

Did you just learn this? It's what several people have been trying to tell you, but apparently you are a little slow on the uptake.

Swan wrote:not amphibians.

That's what we are trying to determine. We can jump directly to the correct answer by asking if alligators are amphibious.

Are they?

Swan wrote: Using the same logic the AAV7 Amphibious Assault Vehicle is also amphibious but not an amphibian.

When discussing vehicles and not animals, yes, an amphibious vehicle is an amphibian. Don't you speak English? An amphibian is one that is amphibious. Did you never learn that subject-adjective relationship? All nouns that have the "amphibious" modifier are amphibians.

Wait, maybe English wasn't your first language and I'm being unfair. At what age did you migrate to an English speaking country?

Don't worry, we'll walk you through this.

Baby steps.

It's ok as I am accepting your defeat as you now admit that alligators are reptiles now as I have always claimed, and obviously a reptile can not be an amphibian,

False dichotomy fallacy. Many reptiles are amphibians.

What you mean to say is that many reptiles are amphibious, which does not make them an amphibian.

CIAO

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Alligators are reptiles,

Did you just learn this? It's what several people have been trying to tell you, but apparently you are a little slow on the uptake.

Swan wrote:not amphibians.

That's what we are trying to determine. We can jump directly to the correct answer by asking if alligators are amphibious.

Are they?

Swan wrote: Using the same logic the AAV7 Amphibious Assault Vehicle is also amphibious but not an amphibian.

When discussing vehicles and not animals, yes, an amphibious vehicle is an amphibian. Don't you speak English? An amphibian is one that is amphibious. Did you never learn that subject-adjective relationship? All nouns that have the "amphibious" modifier are amphibians.

Wait, maybe English wasn't your first language and I'm being unfair. At what age did you migrate to an English speaking country?

Don't worry, we'll walk you through this.

Baby steps.

It's ok as I am accepting your defeat as you now admit that alligators are reptiles now as I have always claimed, and obviously a reptile can not be an amphibian,

False dichotomy fallacy. Many reptiles are amphibians.

What you mean to say is that many reptiles are amphibious, which does not make them an amphibian.

CIAO

"Trump won in a landslide." and alligators ARE amphibians.

Get a clue, moron.

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Alligators are reptiles,

Did you just learn this? It's what several people have been trying to tell you, but apparently you are a little slow on the uptake.

Swan wrote:not amphibians.

That's what we are trying to determine. We can jump directly to the correct answer by asking if alligators are amphibious.

Are they?

Swan wrote: Using the same logic the AAV7 Amphibious Assault Vehicle is also amphibious but not an amphibian.

When discussing vehicles and not animals, yes, an amphibious vehicle is an amphibian. Don't you speak English? An amphibian is one that is amphibious. Did you never learn that subject-adjective relationship? All nouns that have the "amphibious" modifier are amphibians.

Wait, maybe English wasn't your first language and I'm being unfair. At what age did you migrate to an English speaking country?

Don't worry, we'll walk you through this.

Baby steps.

It's ok as I am accepting your defeat as you now admit that alligators are reptiles now as I have always claimed, and obviously a reptile can not be an amphibian,

False dichotomy fallacy. Many reptiles are amphibians.

What you mean to say is that many reptiles are amphibious, which does not make them an amphibian.

CIAO

"Trump won in a landslide." and alligators ARE amphibians.

Get a clue, moron.

Alligators are amphibious reptiles, not amphibians. If you could converse with the Virginia Russians in the Northwestern federal dialect you would comprehend that.

Silly

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Alligators are reptiles,

Did you just learn this? It's what several people have been trying to tell you, but apparently you are a little slow on the uptake.

Swan wrote:not amphibians.

That's what we are trying to determine. We can jump directly to the correct answer by asking if alligators are amphibious.

Are they?

Swan wrote: Using the same logic the AAV7 Amphibious Assault Vehicle is also amphibious but not an amphibian.

When discussing vehicles and not animals, yes, an amphibious vehicle is an amphibian. Don't you speak English? An amphibian is one that is amphibious. Did you never learn that subject-adjective relationship? All nouns that have the "amphibious" modifier are amphibians.

Wait, maybe English wasn't your first language and I'm being unfair. At what age did you migrate to an English speaking country?

Don't worry, we'll walk you through this.

Baby steps.

It's ok as I am accepting your defeat as you now admit that alligators are reptiles now as I have always claimed, and obviously a reptile can not be an amphibian,

False dichotomy fallacy. Many reptiles are amphibians.

What you mean to say is that many reptiles are amphibious, which does not make them an amphibian.

CIAO

"Trump won in a landslide." and alligators ARE amphibians.

Get a clue, moron.

Alligators are amphibious reptiles, not amphibians. If you could converse with the Virginia Russians in the Northwestern federal dialect you would comprehend that.

Silly

Here's is another falsifiable hypothesis.

The first time Parrot Boy asserted that alligators are amphibians, she believed that this is how they are defined in biology textbooks since.... forever.

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Alligators are reptiles,

Did you just learn this? It's what several people have been trying to tell you, but apparently you are a little slow on the uptake.

Swan wrote:not amphibians.

That's what we are trying to determine. We can jump directly to the correct answer by asking if alligators are amphibious.

Are they?

Swan wrote: Using the same logic the AAV7 Amphibious Assault Vehicle is also amphibious but not an amphibian.

When discussing vehicles and not animals, yes, an amphibious vehicle is an amphibian. Don't you speak English? An amphibian is one that is amphibious. Did you never learn that subject-adjective relationship? All nouns that have the "amphibious" modifier are amphibians.

Wait, maybe English wasn't your first language and I'm being unfair. At what age did you migrate to an English speaking country?

Don't worry, we'll walk you through this.

Baby steps.

It's ok as I am accepting your defeat as you now admit that alligators are reptiles now as I have always claimed, and obviously a reptile can not be an amphibian,

False dichotomy fallacy. Many reptiles are amphibians.

What you mean to say is that many reptiles are amphibious, which does not make them an amphibian.

CIAO

"Trump won in a landslide." and alligators ARE amphibians.

Get a clue, moron.

Alligators are amphibious reptiles, not amphibians. If you could converse with the Virginia Russians in the Northwestern federal dialect you would comprehend that.

Silly

Here's is another falsifiable hypothesis.

The first time Parrot Boy asserted that alligators are amphibians, she believed that this is how they are defined in biology textbooks since.... forever.

Parrot does not need a textbook to create his own world as this is what schizzos do

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Alligators are reptiles,

Did you just learn this? It's what several people have been trying to tell you, but apparently you are a little slow on the uptake.

Swan wrote:not amphibians.

That's what we are trying to determine. We can jump directly to the correct answer by asking if alligators are amphibious.

Are they?

Swan wrote: Using the same logic the AAV7 Amphibious Assault Vehicle is also amphibious but not an amphibian.

When discussing vehicles and not animals, yes, an amphibious vehicle is an amphibian. Don't you speak English? An amphibian is one that is amphibious. Did you never learn that subject-adjective relationship? All nouns that have the "amphibious" modifier are amphibians.

Wait, maybe English wasn't your first language and I'm being unfair. At what age did you migrate to an English speaking country?

Don't worry, we'll walk you through this.

Baby steps.

It's ok as I am accepting your defeat as you now admit that alligators are reptiles now as I have always claimed, and obviously a reptile can not be an amphibian,

False dichotomy fallacy. Many reptiles are amphibians.

What you mean to say is that many reptiles are amphibious, which does not make them an amphibian.

CIAO

"Trump won in a landslide." and alligators ARE amphibians.

Get a clue, moron.

Alligators are amphibious reptiles, not amphibians. If you could converse with the Virginia Russians in the Northwestern federal dialect you would comprehend that.

Silly

Here's is another falsifiable hypothesis.

The first time Parrot Boy asserted that alligators are amphibians, she believed that this is how they are defined in biology textbooks since.... forever.

Into the Night wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Alligators are reptiles,

Did you just learn this? It's what several people have been trying to tell you, but apparently you are a little slow on the uptake.

Swan wrote:not amphibians.

That's what we are trying to determine. We can jump directly to the correct answer by asking if alligators are amphibious.

Are they?

Swan wrote: Using the same logic the AAV7 Amphibious Assault Vehicle is also amphibious but not an amphibian.

When discussing vehicles and not animals, yes, an amphibious vehicle is an amphibian. Don't you speak English? An amphibian is one that is amphibious. Did you never learn that subject-adjective relationship? All nouns that have the "amphibious" modifier are amphibians.

Wait, maybe English wasn't your first language and I'm being unfair. At what age did you migrate to an English speaking country?

Don't worry, we'll walk you through this.

Baby steps.

It's ok as I am accepting your defeat as you now admit that alligators are reptiles now as I have always claimed, and obviously a reptile can not be an amphibian,

False dichotomy fallacy. Many reptiles are amphibians.

What you mean to say is that many reptiles are amphibious, which does not make them an amphibian.

CIAO

"Trump won in a landslide." and alligators ARE amphibians.

Get a clue, moron.

Alligators are amphibious reptiles, not amphibians. If you could converse with the Virginia Russians in the Northwestern federal dialect you would comprehend that.

Silly

Here's is another falsifiable hypothesis.

The first time Parrot Boy asserted that alligators are amphibians, she believed that this is how they are defined in biology textbooks since.... forever.

Not a hypothesis. Biology textbooks do not define the word 'amphibian'.

Swan wrote:What you mean to say is that many reptiles are amphibious, which does not make them an amphibian.

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:What you mean to say is that many reptiles are amphibious, which does not make them an amphibian.

... except in English it does.

The adjective "amphibious" indicates that the modified noun is an amphibian.

It's OK if you migrated to an English speaking country when you were too old to really learn this.

In English, all nouns that carry the adjective "amphibious" are amphibians.

All amphibious vehicles are amphibians within the context of vehicles.

It's how the language works.

Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.

Im a BM wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:What you mean to say is that many reptiles are amphibious, which does not make them an amphibian.

... except in English it does.

The adjective "amphibious" indicates that the modified noun is an amphibian.

It's OK if you migrated to an English speaking country when you were too old to really learn this.

In English, all nouns that carry the adjective "amphibious" are amphibians.

All amphibious vehicles are amphibians within the context of vehicles.

It's how the language works.

Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

The paradox of the newt.

All newts are amphibians.

Some newts are not at all amphibious. They must be reptilians or reptilious or something.

I just never studied enough linguistics to understand science.

I guess you'll have to do the hard stuff by yourself.

Im a BM wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:What you mean to say is that many reptiles are amphibious, which does not make them an amphibian.

... except in English it does.

The adjective "amphibious" indicates that the modified noun is an amphibian.

It's OK if you migrated to an English speaking country when you were too old to really learn this.

In English, all nouns that carry the adjective "amphibious" are amphibians.

All amphibious vehicles are amphibians within the context of vehicles.

It's how the language works.

Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

The paradox of the newt.

All newts are amphibians.

Some newts are not at all amphibious. They must be reptilians or reptilious or something.

I just never studied enough linguistics to understand science.

I guess you'll have to do the hard stuff by yourself.

Tree frogs are cool. Some of them spend their whole lives in the trees.

Some of them never ever go near surface the water.

Even their tadpole stage is up in the tree, inside the egg.

It would seem that by the IdaBM definition, tree frogs CANNOT be amphibians because they are NOT amphibious by any stretch of the imagination.

This fourth grade science stuff is just too controversial to discuss anymore.

Im a BM wrote:

Into the Night wrote:
Not a hypothesis. Biology textbooks do not define the word 'amphibian'.

Biology textbooks most certainly DO define the word amphibian.

Im a BM wrote:
Zoology textbooks most certainly clarify that reptiles are NOT amphibians, and that alligators are exclusively reptiles.

Im a BM wrote:
Amphibians are amphibians. Try to wrap your head around THAT one.

Im a BM wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:What you mean to say is that many reptiles are amphibious, which does not make them an amphibian.

... except in English it does.

The adjective "amphibious" indicates that the modified noun is an amphibian.

It's OK if you migrated to an English speaking country when you were too old to really learn this.

In English, all nouns that carry the adjective "amphibious" are amphibians.

All amphibious vehicles are amphibians within the context of vehicles.

It's how the language works.

Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.

The paradox of the newt.

Im a BM wrote:
All newts are amphibians.

Im a BM wrote:
Some newts are not at all amphibious. They must be reptilians or reptilious or something.

Im a BM wrote:
I just never studied enough linguistics to understand science.

Im a BM wrote:
I guess you'll have to do the hard stuff by yourself.

Im a BM wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:What you mean to say is that many reptiles are amphibious, which does not make them an amphibian.

... except in English it does.

The adjective "amphibious" indicates that the modified noun is an amphibian.

It's OK if you migrated to an English speaking country when you were too old to really learn this.

In English, all nouns that carry the adjective "amphibious" are amphibians.

All amphibious vehicles are amphibians within the context of vehicles.

It's how the language works.

Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

The paradox of the newt.

All newts are amphibians.

Some newts are not at all amphibious. They must be reptilians or reptilious or something.

I just never studied enough linguistics to understand science.

I guess you'll have to do the hard stuff by yourself.

Tree frogs are cool. Some of them spend their whole lives in the trees.

Im a BM wrote:
Some of them never ever go near surface the water.

Im a BM wrote:
Even their tadpole stage is up in the tree, inside the egg.

Im a BM wrote:
It would seem that by the IdaBM definition, tree frogs CANNOT be amphibians because they are NOT amphibious by any stretch of the imagination.

Im a BM wrote:
This fourth grade science stuff is just too controversial to discuss anymore.

Into the Night wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:What you mean to say is that many reptiles are amphibious, which does not make them an amphibian.

... except in English it does.

The adjective "amphibious" indicates that the modified noun is an amphibian.

It's OK if you migrated to an English speaking country when you were too old to really learn this.

In English, all nouns that carry the adjective "amphibious" are amphibians.

All amphibious vehicles are amphibians within the context of vehicles.

It's how the language works.

Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

The paradox of the newt.

All newts are amphibians.

Some newts are not at all amphibious. They must be reptilians or reptilious or something.

I just never studied enough linguistics to understand science.

I guess you'll have to do the hard stuff by yourself.

Tree frogs are cool. Some of them spend their whole lives in the trees.

None do.

Im a BM wrote:
Some of them never ever go near surface the water.

WRONG. All tree frogs will spend some time in water and they require water to breed.

Im a BM wrote:
Even their tadpole stage is up in the tree, inside the egg.

In water.

Im a BM wrote:
It would seem that by the IdaBM definition, tree frogs CANNOT be amphibians because they are NOT amphibious by any stretch of the imagination.

Yes they are.

Im a BM wrote:
This fourth grade science stuff is just too controversial to discuss anymore.

You don't get to speak for every 4th grade student or teacher. You only get to speak for you. Omniscience fallacy. There is no science being discussed here.