| 01-11-2023 22:42 |
Into the Night ★★★★★
(22820) |
Im a BM wrote:
For people who actually ever studied science,
Science isn't a 'study'.
Im a BM wrote:
there was no "debate" about whether or not alligators can be scientifically classified as amphibians.
Science is not a classification system. Alligators are amphibians.
Im a BM wrote:
But then it became about the adjective "amphibious".
Now you want to play word games.
Im a BM wrote:
"Amphibious" can refer to inanimate objects. (amphibious assault vehicle)
Also an amphibian assault vehicle.
Im a BM wrote:
"Amphibious" could refer to the life cycle of many insects - larval stage lives in water, adult stage on land.
Yes. Many insects are amphibians.
Im a BM wrote:
But these animals are not in the phylum chordata, sub phylum vertebrata.
So?
Im a BM wrote:
Kind of a requirement to be an amphibian.
Not a requirement to be amphibian.
Im a BM wrote:
Many amphibians aren't even amphibious.
Then they aren't amphibians.
Im a BM wrote:
I was seven years old visiting the redwoods at Prairie Creek state park. The adult salamanders in the creek had GILLS. The rangers warned us that they could die if we caught them and took them out of the water. Once their gills got dry, that would be it. I am more amphibious than those salamanders.
You don't live in water.
Im a BM wrote:
I wasn't much older when we found a newt in the sand dunes. This adult amphibian was breathing through lungs, not gills. But if we put it in the water, its only move would be to try to swim to shore, with difficulty. I am more amphibious than that newt.
You don't live in water.
Im a BM wrote:
Much later I learned about the tree frogs in the montane cloud forest. Their entire lives are spent above ground in the trees. Some species create a mucus sack full of water to lay their eggs in, up in the tree. The juvenile stage is a tadpole getting oxygen through gills, but it never leaves the egg. After metamorphosis, it emerges as an air breathing adult which never goes near a body of surface water. I am more amphibious than those tree frogs.
You don't live in water.
Im a BM wrote:
But natural science is not a word game.
And you are playing word games.
Im a BM wrote:
It has been more than two centuries now that every valid scientific textbook has classified alligators as reptiles.
Science is not a book, paper, pamphlet, magazine, journal, or website. Science is not a classification system.
Alligators are reptiles and amphibians.
Im a BM wrote:
Word games about what is "amphibious" don't change that.
[quote]Im a BM wrote:
They just reveal ignorance.
And scientific illiteracy.
The Parrot Killer
Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles
Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan
While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
| 01-11-2023 22:43 |
Into the Night★★★★★
(22820) |
James_ wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
For people who actually ever studied science, there was no "debate" about whether or not alligators can be scientifically classified as amphibians.
But then it became about the adjective "amphibious".
"Amphibious" can refer to inanimate objects. (amphibious assault vehicle)
"Amphibious" could refer to the life cycle of many insects - larval stage lives in water, adult stage on land. But these animals are not in the phylum chordata, sub phylum vertebrata. Kind of a requirement to be an amphibian.
Many amphibians aren't even amphibious.
I was seven years old visiting the redwoods at Prairie Creek state park. The adult salamanders in the creek had GILLS. The rangers warned us that they could die if we caught them and took them out of the water. Once their gills got dry, that would be it. I am more amphibious than those salamanders.
I wasn't much older when we found a newt in the sand dunes. This adult amphibian was breathing through lungs, not gills. But if we put it in the water, its only move would be to try to swim to shore, with difficulty. I am more amphibious than that newt.
Much later I learned about the tree frogs in the montane cloud forest. Their entire lives are spent above ground in the trees. Some species create a mucus sack full of water to lay their eggs in, up in the tree. The juvenile stage is a tadpole getting oxygen through gills, but it never leaves the egg. After metamorphosis, it emerges as an air breathing adult which never goes near a body of surface water. I am more amphibious than those tree frogs.
But natural science is not a word game.
It has been more than two centuries now that every valid scientific textbook has classified alligators as reptiles.
Word games about what is "amphibious" don't change that.
They just reveal ignorance.
And scientific illiteracy.
SOooo, as an educated person you disagree with how a species breathes and instead uses how a motor vehicle is considered? And now I doubt you're educated.
He isn't. He's quite illiterate. Even his 'PhD' is totally fake.
But he really likes whining, word games, and buzzwords.
The Parrot Killer
Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles
Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan
While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
Edited on 01-11-2023 22:46 |
| RE: CH2O is formula for formaldehyde02-11-2023 01:07 |
Im a BM★★★★☆
(1622) |
James_ wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
For people who actually ever studied science, there was no "debate" about whether or not alligators can be scientifically classified as amphibians.
But then it became about the adjective "amphibious".
"Amphibious" can refer to inanimate objects. (amphibious assault vehicle)
"Amphibious" could refer to the life cycle of many insects - larval stage lives in water, adult stage on land. But these animals are not in the phylum chordata, sub phylum vertebrata. Kind of a requirement to be an amphibian.
Many amphibians aren't even amphibious.
I was seven years old visiting the redwoods at Prairie Creek state park. The adult salamanders in the creek had GILLS. The rangers warned us that they could die if we caught them and took them out of the water. Once their gills got dry, that would be it. I am more amphibious than those salamanders.
I wasn't much older when we found a newt in the sand dunes. This adult amphibian was breathing through lungs, not gills. But if we put it in the water, its only move would be to try to swim to shore, with difficulty. I am more amphibious than that newt.
Much later I learned about the tree frogs in the montane cloud forest. Their entire lives are spent above ground in the trees. Some species create a mucus sack full of water to lay their eggs in, up in the tree. The juvenile stage is a tadpole getting oxygen through gills, but it never leaves the egg. After metamorphosis, it emerges as an air breathing adult which never goes near a body of surface water. I am more amphibious than those tree frogs.
But natural science is not a word game.
It has been more than two centuries now that every valid scientific textbook has classified alligators as reptiles.
Word games about what is "amphibious" don't change that.
They just reveal ignorance.
And scientific illiteracy.
SOooo, as an educated person you disagree with how a species breathes and instead uses how a motor vehicle is considered? And now I doubt you're educated.
"CH2O" seems to get invoked as a player in stratospheric chemistry.
It is the formula for formaldehyde. |
| 02-11-2023 02:48 |
James_★★★★★
(2273) |
Im a BM wrote:
"CH2O" seems to get invoked as a player in stratospheric chemistry.
It is the formula for formaldehyde.
It's a gas of little significance.
CH 2 O concentrations were 0.399 and 0.410 ppbv for 0– 2 km, 0.250 and 0.355 ppbv for 2 –4 km, and 0.217 and 0.280 ppbv for 4 –8 km, respectively.
Those numbers say less than 1 CH2O molecule for every 2 billion molecules by volume. |
| RE: Just BEGGING to get doxxed...06-11-2023 09:16 |
Im a BM★★★★☆
(1622) |
Im a BM wrote:
Google "Cyclical Continuum of Elemental Properties"
The Native American students just weren't getting it the first time, when it was time for the lecture about the Periodic Table of Elements.
The same presentation had been effective enough at the other community college.
But the puzzled looks, and the multiple questions revealed they weren't seeing the continuity.
The cultural bias of doing a lot of reading, starting at the top left, going across to the right, and then ASSUMING the continuity to the left end of the next line down.
The table was arranged like written text.
So, I started to draw a big spiral on the white board with hydrogen at the center.
That's when I got to see a bunch of students at once all get that delighted look of understanding.
The lecture went fine after that.
A few years later I started working on one at home that could be used as a teaching tool.
You can see it with five words entered into Google.
Chemistry teachers use it as a teaching tool.
Another special moment with those students came in the Natural History class.
When it was time for the lecture about Evolutionary Biology, they got it a whole lot faster than the students at the other college.
I think I was just a sentence or to into it.
I said, "All living organisms, every animal, plant, fungus, and microorganism are blood relatives descended from a single common ancestor."
That delighted look was already on everyone's face.
They had never been taught this before as science, but they knew it well as a fundamental truth known for generations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just BEGGING to get doxxed!
This was the open invitation to post a map to my home.
All is fair in war and climate debate. |
| 08-11-2023 11:32 |
IBdaMann ★★★★★
(14932) |
Im a BM wrote:Just BEGGING to get doxxed!
Wrong wording. You INSISTED on publishing your own personal information.
An image search on your continuum graphic, as you demanded, reveals your name, Robert R. Northup, which you can see on the image. (Time: 14 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Biogeochemist" basically reveals that you live in Oakland. (Time: 17 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Oakland address" lists 4551 Fairbairn Ave, Oakland, CA without having to even click on any links. (Time: 6 seconds)
Google maps immediately comes up with THIS, indicating that you have a nice silver Lexus RX330, a Chevy 1500HD and a covered motorcycle. (Time: 5 seconds)
Anyway, anyone who is willing to spend a minute complying with your demands will learn at least this much about you. |
| RE: The map posted was not Oakland08-11-2023 18:41 |
sealover★★★★☆
(1771) |
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:Just BEGGING to get doxxed!
Wrong wording. You INSISTED on publishing your own personal information.
An image search on your continuum graphic, as you demanded, reveals your name, Robert R. Northup, which you can see on the image. (Time: 14 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Biogeochemist" basically reveals that you live in Oakland. (Time: 17 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Oakland address" lists 4551 Fairbairn Ave, Oakland, CA without having to even click on any links. (Time: 6 seconds)
Google maps immediately comes up with THIS, indicating that you have a nice silver Lexus RX330, a Chevy 1500HD and a covered motorcycle. (Time: 5 seconds)
Anyway, anyone who is willing to spend a minute complying with your demands will learn at least this much about you.
Branner removed posts that had a detailed map to a home. NOT in Oakland.
Maybe Branner would agree that providing a way to find a poster by recommending a Google search is an open invitation to have...
Well, maybe there is no unambiguous definition for doxxing.
But what IdaBM does cannot be defined as debating in a respectful manner. |
| 08-11-2023 19:01 |
GasGuzzler★★★★★
(3056) |
sealover wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:Just BEGGING to get doxxed!
Wrong wording. You INSISTED on publishing your own personal information.
An image search on your continuum graphic, as you demanded, reveals your name, Robert R. Northup, which you can see on the image. (Time: 14 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Biogeochemist" basically reveals that you live in Oakland. (Time: 17 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Oakland address" lists 4551 Fairbairn Ave, Oakland, CA without having to even click on any links. (Time: 6 seconds)
Google maps immediately comes up with THIS, indicating that you have a nice silver Lexus RX330, a Chevy 1500HD and a covered motorcycle. (Time: 5 seconds)
Anyway, anyone who is willing to spend a minute complying with your demands will learn at least this much about you.
Branner removed posts that had a detailed map to a home. NOT in Oakland..
sealover wrote:
Maybe Branner would agree that providing a way to find a poster by recommending a Google search is an open invitation to have...
Maybe you just need to be bitch slapped and grow some skin.
sealover wrote:
Well, maybe there is no unambiguous definition for doxxing. maybe you just need to be bitch slapped and grow some skin
sealover wrote:
But what IdaBM does cannot be defined as debating in a respectful manner
He will speak for himself, but I'm quite certain he has nothing but respect as he mops the floor with your ignorant whining. Did I mention you should be bitch slapped a grow some skin?
Radiation will not penetrate a perfect insulator, thus as I said space is not a perfect insulator.- Swan |
| RE: "..complying with your demands.."10-11-2023 17:33 |
Im a BM★★★★☆
(1622) |
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:Just BEGGING to get doxxed!
Wrong wording. You INSISTED on publishing your own personal information.
An image search on your continuum graphic, as you demanded, reveals your name, Robert R. Northup, which you can see on the image. (Time: 14 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Biogeochemist" basically reveals that you live in Oakland. (Time: 17 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Oakland address" lists 4551 Fairbairn Ave, Oakland, CA without having to even click on any links. (Time: 6 seconds)
Google maps immediately comes up with THIS, indicating that you have a nice silver Lexus RX330, a Chevy 1500HD and a covered motorcycle. (Time: 5 seconds)
Anyway, anyone who is willing to spend a minute complying with your demands will learn at least this much about you.
At least Google is not so scientifically illiterate that it does not recognize biogeochemistry as an actual field of science.
But, "anyone who is willing to spend a minute complying with (my) demands will learn.." that I hoped to engage in discussion about this actual field of science.
Trolls always reveal their true colors. |
| RE: Branner will NEVER ban IBdaMann26-11-2023 21:16 |
Im a BM★★★★☆
(1622) |
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:Just BEGGING to get doxxed!
Wrong wording. You INSISTED on publishing your own personal information.
An image search on your continuum graphic, as you demanded, reveals your name, Robert R. Northup, which you can see on the image. (Time: 14 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Biogeochemist" basically reveals that you live in Oakland. (Time: 17 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Oakland address" lists 4551 Fairbairn Ave, Oakland, CA without having to even click on any links. (Time: 6 seconds)
Google maps immediately comes up with THIS, indicating that you have a nice silver Lexus RX330, a Chevy 1500HD and a covered motorcycle. (Time: 5 seconds)
Anyway, anyone who is willing to spend a minute complying with your demands will learn at least this much about you.
Okay, Branner.
Sooner or later you will come back to check on the website, in case "AngryMessiah" or someone is trying to collect funds here.
You might eventually notice a PM requesting that you remove a post in which one member publishes the personal information of another member.
Heck, you might even notice that your website is DEAD. |
| 27-11-2023 21:17 |
gfm7175 ★★★★★
(3340) |
Im a BM wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:Just BEGGING to get doxxed!
Wrong wording. You INSISTED on publishing your own personal information.
An image search on your continuum graphic, as you demanded, reveals your name, Robert R. Northup, which you can see on the image. (Time: 14 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Biogeochemist" basically reveals that you live in Oakland. (Time: 17 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Oakland address" lists 4551 Fairbairn Ave, Oakland, CA without having to even click on any links. (Time: 6 seconds)
Google maps immediately comes up with THIS, indicating that you have a nice silver Lexus RX330, a Chevy 1500HD and a covered motorcycle. (Time: 5 seconds)
Anyway, anyone who is willing to spend a minute complying with your demands will learn at least this much about you.
Okay, Branner.
Sooner or later you will come back to check on the website, in case "AngryMessiah" or someone is trying to collect funds here.
You might eventually notice a PM requesting that you remove a post in which one member publishes the personal information of another member.
Heck, you might even notice that your website is DEAD.
Why are you mad at IBDaMann for your own posting of your own personal information? |
| RE: not MY Lexus!27-11-2023 21:32 |
Im a BM★★★★☆
(1622) |
gfm7175 wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:Just BEGGING to get doxxed!
Wrong wording. You INSISTED on publishing your own personal information.
An image search on your continuum graphic, as you demanded, reveals your name, Robert R. Northup, which you can see on the image. (Time: 14 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Biogeochemist" basically reveals that you live in Oakland. (Time: 17 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Oakland address" lists 4551 Fairbairn Ave, Oakland, CA without having to even click on any links. (Time: 6 seconds)
Google maps immediately comes up with THIS, indicating that you have a nice silver Lexus RX330, a Chevy 1500HD and a covered motorcycle. (Time: 5 seconds)
Anyway, anyone who is willing to spend a minute complying with your demands will learn at least this much about you.
Okay, Branner.
Sooner or later you will come back to check on the website, in case "AngryMessiah" or someone is trying to collect funds here.
You might eventually notice a PM requesting that you remove a post in which one member publishes the personal information of another member.
Heck, you might even notice that your website is DEAD.
Why are you mad at IBDaMann for your own posting of your own personal information?
Yes, I REposted IdaBM's post about some house in Oakland with a Lexus.
Not MY Lexus! Not even my house.
I'm not sure whose personal information IdaBM shared with this.
Maybe there is a biogeochemist with a Lexus who lives there.
How would Google even know what a biogeochemist is?
Isn't it just a religious cult started by some crazy Russian guy?
Somehow, it can be recognized that another member should take a course in computer science because otherwise they have no expertise or knowledge to contribute...
It is pretty obvious that most trolls have never even taken ONE college level course in ANY field of science.
But they are the only ones who know what "heat" means.
They are the only ones who know the difference between science and buzzwords.
That's why they call it all "gibber babble".
If I have no idea what a word means, obviously it is a buzzword that does not mean anything to anyone. |
| 27-11-2023 22:02 |
gfm7175★★★★★
(3340) |
Im a BM wrote:
Yes, I REposted IdaBM's post about some house in Oakland with a Lexus.
Not MY Lexus! Not even my house.
I'm not sure whose personal information IdaBM shared with this.
Maybe there is a biogeochemist with a Lexus who lives there.
How would Google even know what a biogeochemist is?
Isn't it just a religious cult started by some crazy Russian guy?
Somehow, it can be recognized that another member should take a course in computer science because otherwise they have no expertise or knowledge to contribute...
It is pretty obvious that most trolls have never even taken ONE college level course in ANY field of science.
But they are the only ones who know what "heat" means.
They are the only ones who know the difference between science and buzzwords.
That's why they call it all "gibber babble".
If I have no idea what a word means, obviously it is a buzzword that does not mean anything to anyone.
Are you okay? |
| RE: Branner didn't bother this time29-11-2023 20:56 |
Im a BM★★★★☆
(1622) |
GasGuzzler wrote:
sealover wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:Just BEGGING to get doxxed!
Wrong wording. You INSISTED on publishing your own personal information.
An image search on your continuum graphic, as you demanded, reveals your name, Robert R. Northup, which you can see on the image. (Time: 14 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Biogeochemist" basically reveals that you live in Oakland. (Time: 17 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Oakland address" lists 4551 Fairbairn Ave, Oakland, CA without having to even click on any links. (Time: 6 seconds)
Google maps immediately comes up with THIS, indicating that you have a nice silver Lexus RX330, a Chevy 1500HD and a covered motorcycle. (Time: 5 seconds)
Anyway, anyone who is willing to spend a minute complying with your demands will learn at least this much about you.
Branner removed posts that had a detailed map to a home. NOT in Oakland..
sealover wrote:
Maybe Branner would agree that providing a way to find a poster by recommending a Google search is an open invitation to have...
Maybe you just need to be bitch slapped and grow some skin.
sealover wrote:
Well, maybe there is no unambiguous definition for doxxing. maybe you just need to be bitch slapped and grow some skin
sealover wrote:
But what IdaBM does cannot be defined as debating in a respectful manner
He will speak for himself, but I'm quite certain he has nothing but respect as he mops the floor with your ignorant whining. Did I mention you should be bitch slapped a grow some skin?
Branner's last visit was two weeks ago.
Either he didn't read his PM, or he just doesn't care what happens here.
Both his websites look like this.
A handful of members who have been there for years and have all racked up thousands and thousands of posts do ALL the discussing.
Not because there aren't another 1680 or 2500 members who are interested in discussing climate change.
It is because very few people want to be insulted by scientifically illiterate trolls. |
| 29-11-2023 21:02 |
James_★★★★★
(2273) |
Im a BM wrote:
GasGuzzler wrote:
sealover wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:Just BEGGING to get doxxed!
Wrong wording. You INSISTED on publishing your own personal information.
An image search on your continuum graphic, as you demanded, reveals your name, Robert R. Northup, which you can see on the image. (Time: 14 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Biogeochemist" basically reveals that you live in Oakland. (Time: 17 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Oakland address" lists 4551 Fairbairn Ave, Oakland, CA without having to even click on any links. (Time: 6 seconds)
Google maps immediately comes up with THIS, indicating that you have a nice silver Lexus RX330, a Chevy 1500HD and a covered motorcycle. (Time: 5 seconds)
Anyway, anyone who is willing to spend a minute complying with your demands will learn at least this much about you.
Branner removed posts that had a detailed map to a home. NOT in Oakland..
sealover wrote:
Maybe Branner would agree that providing a way to find a poster by recommending a Google search is an open invitation to have...
Maybe you just need to be bitch slapped and grow some skin.
sealover wrote:
Well, maybe there is no unambiguous definition for doxxing. maybe you just need to be bitch slapped and grow some skin
sealover wrote:
But what IdaBM does cannot be defined as debating in a respectful manner
He will speak for himself, but I'm quite certain he has nothing but respect as he mops the floor with your ignorant whining. Did I mention you should be bitch slapped a grow some skin?
Branner's last visit was two weeks ago.
Either he didn't read his PM, or he just doesn't care what happens here.
Both his websites look like this.
A handful of members who have been there for years and have all racked up thousands and thousands of posts do ALL the discussing.
Not because there aren't another 1680 or 2500 members who are interested in discussing climate change.
It is because very few people want to be insulted by scientifically illiterate trolls.
Sadly many forums are taken over by people who have nothing to say. |
| 30-11-2023 05:47 |
Into the Night★★★★★
(22820) |
sealover wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:Just BEGGING to get doxxed!
Wrong wording. You INSISTED on publishing your own personal information.
An image search on your continuum graphic, as you demanded, reveals your name, Robert R. Northup, which you can see on the image. (Time: 14 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Biogeochemist" basically reveals that you live in Oakland. (Time: 17 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Oakland address" lists 4551 Fairbairn Ave, Oakland, CA without having to even click on any links. (Time: 6 seconds)
Google maps immediately comes up with THIS, indicating that you have a nice silver Lexus RX330, a Chevy 1500HD and a covered motorcycle. (Time: 5 seconds)
Anyway, anyone who is willing to spend a minute complying with your demands will learn at least this much about you.
Branner removed posts that had a detailed map to a home. NOT in Oakland.
Maybe Branner would agree that providing a way to find a poster by recommending a Google search is an open invitation to have...
Well, maybe there is no unambiguous definition for doxxing.
But what IdaBM does cannot be defined as debating in a respectful manner.
YOU posted your personal information, Robert.
YOU are the only one to blame.
You are not debating. You are describing yourself.
The Parrot Killer
Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles
Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan
While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
| 30-11-2023 05:48 |
Into the Night★★★★★
(22820) |
Im a BM wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:Just BEGGING to get doxxed!
Wrong wording. You INSISTED on publishing your own personal information.
An image search on your continuum graphic, as you demanded, reveals your name, Robert R. Northup, which you can see on the image. (Time: 14 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Biogeochemist" basically reveals that you live in Oakland. (Time: 17 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Oakland address" lists 4551 Fairbairn Ave, Oakland, CA without having to even click on any links. (Time: 6 seconds)
Google maps immediately comes up with THIS, indicating that you have a nice silver Lexus RX330, a Chevy 1500HD and a covered motorcycle. (Time: 5 seconds)
Anyway, anyone who is willing to spend a minute complying with your demands will learn at least this much about you.
At least Google is not so scientifically illiterate that it does not recognize biogeochemistry as an actual field of science.
But, "anyone who is willing to spend a minute complying with (my) demands will learn.." that I hoped to engage in discussion about this actual field of science.
Trolls always reveal their true colors. There is no branch of science called 'biogeochemistry'. Google is not science.
The Parrot Killer
Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles
Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan
While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
| 30-11-2023 05:49 |
Into the Night★★★★★
(22820) |
Im a BM wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:Just BEGGING to get doxxed!
Wrong wording. You INSISTED on publishing your own personal information.
An image search on your continuum graphic, as you demanded, reveals your name, Robert R. Northup, which you can see on the image. (Time: 14 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Biogeochemist" basically reveals that you live in Oakland. (Time: 17 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Oakland address" lists 4551 Fairbairn Ave, Oakland, CA without having to even click on any links. (Time: 6 seconds)
Google maps immediately comes up with THIS, indicating that you have a nice silver Lexus RX330, a Chevy 1500HD and a covered motorcycle. (Time: 5 seconds)
Anyway, anyone who is willing to spend a minute complying with your demands will learn at least this much about you.
Okay, Branner.
Sooner or later you will come back to check on the website, in case "AngryMessiah" or someone is trying to collect funds here.
You might eventually notice a PM requesting that you remove a post in which one member publishes the personal information of another member.
Heck, you might even notice that your website is DEAD.
YOU published your own personal information. Only YOU are to blame. Projecting YOUR problem on another is an inversion fallacy.
The Parrot Killer
Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles
Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan
While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
| 30-11-2023 05:58 |
Into the Night★★★★★
(22820) |
Im a BM wrote:
gfm7175 wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:Just BEGGING to get doxxed!
Wrong wording. You INSISTED on publishing your own personal information.
An image search on your continuum graphic, as you demanded, reveals your name, Robert R. Northup, which you can see on the image. (Time: 14 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Biogeochemist" basically reveals that you live in Oakland. (Time: 17 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Oakland address" lists 4551 Fairbairn Ave, Oakland, CA without having to even click on any links. (Time: 6 seconds)
Google maps immediately comes up with THIS, indicating that you have a nice silver Lexus RX330, a Chevy 1500HD and a covered motorcycle. (Time: 5 seconds)
Anyway, anyone who is willing to spend a minute complying with your demands will learn at least this much about you.
Okay, Branner.
Sooner or later you will come back to check on the website, in case "AngryMessiah" or someone is trying to collect funds here.
You might eventually notice a PM requesting that you remove a post in which one member publishes the personal information of another member.
Heck, you might even notice that your website is DEAD.
Why are you mad at IBDaMann for your own posting of your own personal information?
Yes, I REposted IdaBM's post about some house in Oakland with a Lexus.
Yours, from the personal information YOU published about yourself.
Im a BM wrote:
Not MY Lexus! Not even my house.
Trying to deny your own post again?
Im a BM wrote:
I'm not sure whose personal information IdaBM shared with this.
Denying your own post won't work. ANYONE can go read it.
Im a BM wrote:
How would Google even know what a biogeochemist is?
Google doesn't 'know' anything. It's an indexing system.
Im a BM wrote:
Isn't it just a religious cult started by some crazy Russian guy?
Google was started in 1998 by Larry Page and Sergey Brin, developing the search algorithm as students at Stanford.
Im a BM wrote:
Somehow, it can be recognized that another member should take a course in computer science because otherwise they have no expertise or knowledge to contribute...
DON'T try to bullshit me about computer science or computer design.
Im a BM wrote:
It is pretty obvious that most trolls have never even taken ONE college level course in ANY field of science.
Science is not a college or a course.
Im a BM wrote:
But they are the only ones who know what "heat" means.
The concept of 'heat' is defined by the 2nd law of thermodynamics, a law of physics that you ignore. It is YOU that does not know what 'heat' means. Inversion fallacy.
Im a BM wrote:
They are the only ones who know the difference between science and buzzwords.
No, you don't get to call your buzzwords 'science'.
Im a BM wrote:
That's why they call it all "gibber babble".
Your buzzwords ARE gibber babble.
Im a BM wrote:
If I have no idea what a word means, obviously it is a buzzword that does not mean anything to anyone.
Correct.
The Parrot Killer
Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles
Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan
While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
| 30-11-2023 06:00 |
Into the Night★★★★★
(22820) |
gfm7175 wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
Yes, I REposted IdaBM's post about some house in Oakland with a Lexus.
Not MY Lexus! Not even my house.
I'm not sure whose personal information IdaBM shared with this.
Maybe there is a biogeochemist with a Lexus who lives there.
How would Google even know what a biogeochemist is?
Isn't it just a religious cult started by some crazy Russian guy?
Somehow, it can be recognized that another member should take a course in computer science because otherwise they have no expertise or knowledge to contribute...
It is pretty obvious that most trolls have never even taken ONE college level course in ANY field of science.
But they are the only ones who know what "heat" means.
They are the only ones who know the difference between science and buzzwords.
That's why they call it all "gibber babble".
If I have no idea what a word means, obviously it is a buzzword that does not mean anything to anyone.
Are you okay?
I think his post answers that question already. He's not okay.
The Parrot Killer
Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles
Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan
While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
| 30-11-2023 06:01 |
Into the Night★★★★★
(22820) |
Im a BM wrote:
GasGuzzler wrote:
sealover wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:Just BEGGING to get doxxed!
Wrong wording. You INSISTED on publishing your own personal information.
An image search on your continuum graphic, as you demanded, reveals your name, Robert R. Northup, which you can see on the image. (Time: 14 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Biogeochemist" basically reveals that you live in Oakland. (Time: 17 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Oakland address" lists 4551 Fairbairn Ave, Oakland, CA without having to even click on any links. (Time: 6 seconds)
Google maps immediately comes up with THIS, indicating that you have a nice silver Lexus RX330, a Chevy 1500HD and a covered motorcycle. (Time: 5 seconds)
Anyway, anyone who is willing to spend a minute complying with your demands will learn at least this much about you.
Branner removed posts that had a detailed map to a home. NOT in Oakland..
sealover wrote:
Maybe Branner would agree that providing a way to find a poster by recommending a Google search is an open invitation to have...
Maybe you just need to be bitch slapped and grow some skin.
sealover wrote:
Well, maybe there is no unambiguous definition for doxxing. maybe you just need to be bitch slapped and grow some skin
sealover wrote:
But what IdaBM does cannot be defined as debating in a respectful manner
He will speak for himself, but I'm quite certain he has nothing but respect as he mops the floor with your ignorant whining. Did I mention you should be bitch slapped a grow some skin?
Branner's last visit was two weeks ago.
Either he didn't read his PM, or he just doesn't care what happens here.
Both his websites look like this.
A handful of members who have been there for years and have all racked up thousands and thousands of posts do ALL the discussing.
Not because there aren't another 1680 or 2500 members who are interested in discussing climate change.
It is because very few people want to be insulted by scientifically illiterate trolls.
Maybe you should stop insulting people, you scientifically illiterate troll.
The Parrot Killer
Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles
Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan
While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
| 30-11-2023 06:02 |
Into the Night★★★★★
(22820) |
James_ wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
GasGuzzler wrote:
sealover wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:Just BEGGING to get doxxed!
Wrong wording. You INSISTED on publishing your own personal information.
An image search on your continuum graphic, as you demanded, reveals your name, Robert R. Northup, which you can see on the image. (Time: 14 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Biogeochemist" basically reveals that you live in Oakland. (Time: 17 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Oakland address" lists 4551 Fairbairn Ave, Oakland, CA without having to even click on any links. (Time: 6 seconds)
Google maps immediately comes up with THIS, indicating that you have a nice silver Lexus RX330, a Chevy 1500HD and a covered motorcycle. (Time: 5 seconds)
Anyway, anyone who is willing to spend a minute complying with your demands will learn at least this much about you.
Branner removed posts that had a detailed map to a home. NOT in Oakland..
sealover wrote:
Maybe Branner would agree that providing a way to find a poster by recommending a Google search is an open invitation to have...
Maybe you just need to be bitch slapped and grow some skin.
sealover wrote:
Well, maybe there is no unambiguous definition for doxxing. maybe you just need to be bitch slapped and grow some skin
sealover wrote:
But what IdaBM does cannot be defined as debating in a respectful manner
He will speak for himself, but I'm quite certain he has nothing but respect as he mops the floor with your ignorant whining. Did I mention you should be bitch slapped a grow some skin?
Branner's last visit was two weeks ago.
Either he didn't read his PM, or he just doesn't care what happens here.
Both his websites look like this.
A handful of members who have been there for years and have all racked up thousands and thousands of posts do ALL the discussing.
Not because there aren't another 1680 or 2500 members who are interested in discussing climate change.
It is because very few people want to be insulted by scientifically illiterate trolls.
Sadly many forums are taken over by people who have nothing to say.
And you have nothing to say. You have not, however, taken over the forum.
The Parrot Killer
Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles
Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan
While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
Edited on 30-11-2023 06:03 |
| 30-11-2023 13:13 |
Swan ★★★★★
(6003) |
Into the Night wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
GasGuzzler wrote:
sealover wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:Just BEGGING to get doxxed!
Wrong wording. You INSISTED on publishing your own personal information.
An image search on your continuum graphic, as you demanded, reveals your name, Robert R. Northup, which you can see on the image. (Time: 14 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Biogeochemist" basically reveals that you live in Oakland. (Time: 17 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Oakland address" lists 4551 Fairbairn Ave, Oakland, CA without having to even click on any links. (Time: 6 seconds)
Google maps immediately comes up with THIS, indicating that you have a nice silver Lexus RX330, a Chevy 1500HD and a covered motorcycle. (Time: 5 seconds)
Anyway, anyone who is willing to spend a minute complying with your demands will learn at least this much about you.
Branner removed posts that had a detailed map to a home. NOT in Oakland..
sealover wrote:
Maybe Branner would agree that providing a way to find a poster by recommending a Google search is an open invitation to have...
Maybe you just need to be bitch slapped and grow some skin.
sealover wrote:
Well, maybe there is no unambiguous definition for doxxing. maybe you just need to be bitch slapped and grow some skin
sealover wrote:
But what IdaBM does cannot be defined as debating in a respectful manner
He will speak for himself, but I'm quite certain he has nothing but respect as he mops the floor with your ignorant whining. Did I mention you should be bitch slapped a grow some skin?
Branner's last visit was two weeks ago.
Either he didn't read his PM, or he just doesn't care what happens here.
Both his websites look like this.
A handful of members who have been there for years and have all racked up thousands and thousands of posts do ALL the discussing.
Not because there aren't another 1680 or 2500 members who are interested in discussing climate change.
It is because very few people want to be insulted by scientifically illiterate trolls.
Maybe you should stop insulting people, you scientifically illiterate troll.
Says the nuclear scientist who claims that the Earth is 6000 years old
IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.
According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC
This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop
I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.
ULTRA MAGA
"Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA
So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic?
Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy
Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL |
| 01-12-2023 04:17 |
Into the Night★★★★★
(22820) |
Swan wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
GasGuzzler wrote:
sealover wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:Just BEGGING to get doxxed!
Wrong wording. You INSISTED on publishing your own personal information.
An image search on your continuum graphic, as you demanded, reveals your name, Robert R. Northup, which you can see on the image. (Time: 14 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Biogeochemist" basically reveals that you live in Oakland. (Time: 17 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Oakland address" lists 4551 Fairbairn Ave, Oakland, CA without having to even click on any links. (Time: 6 seconds)
Google maps immediately comes up with THIS, indicating that you have a nice silver Lexus RX330, a Chevy 1500HD and a covered motorcycle. (Time: 5 seconds)
Anyway, anyone who is willing to spend a minute complying with your demands will learn at least this much about you.
Branner removed posts that had a detailed map to a home. NOT in Oakland..
sealover wrote:
Maybe Branner would agree that providing a way to find a poster by recommending a Google search is an open invitation to have...
Maybe you just need to be bitch slapped and grow some skin.
sealover wrote:
Well, maybe there is no unambiguous definition for doxxing. maybe you just need to be bitch slapped and grow some skin
sealover wrote:
But what IdaBM does cannot be defined as debating in a respectful manner
He will speak for himself, but I'm quite certain he has nothing but respect as he mops the floor with your ignorant whining. Did I mention you should be bitch slapped a grow some skin?
Branner's last visit was two weeks ago.
Either he didn't read his PM, or he just doesn't care what happens here.
Both his websites look like this.
A handful of members who have been there for years and have all racked up thousands and thousands of posts do ALL the discussing.
Not because there aren't another 1680 or 2500 members who are interested in discussing climate change.
It is because very few people want to be insulted by scientifically illiterate trolls.
Maybe you should stop insulting people, you scientifically illiterate troll.
Says the nuclear scientist who claims that the Earth is 6000 years old
I never made any such claim. You are hallucinating again. The age of Earth is unknown.
The Parrot Killer
Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles
Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan
While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
| 01-12-2023 07:51 |
Swan★★★★★
(6003) |
Into the Night wrote:
Swan wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
GasGuzzler wrote:
sealover wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:Just BEGGING to get doxed!
Wrong wording. You INSISTED on publishing your own personal information.
An image search on your continuum graphic, as you demanded, reveals your name, Robert R. Northup, which you can see on the image. (Time: 14 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Biogeochemist" basically reveals that you live in Oakland. (Time: 17 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Oakland address" lists 4551 Fairbairn Ave, Oakland, CA without having to even click on any links. (Time: 6 seconds)
Google maps immediately comes up with THIS, indicating that you have a nice silver Lexus RX330, a Chevy 1500HD and a covered motorcycle. (Time: 5 seconds)
Anyway, anyone who is willing to spend a minute complying with your demands will learn at least this much about you.
Branner removed posts that had a detailed map to a home. NOT in Oakland..
sealover wrote:
Maybe Branner would agree that providing a way to find a poster by recommending a Google search is an open invitation to have...
Maybe you just need to be bitch slapped and grow some skin.
sealover wrote:
Well, maybe there is no unambiguous definition for doxxing. maybe you just need to be bitch slapped and grow some skin
sealover wrote:
But what IdaBM does cannot be defined as debating in a respectful manner
He will speak for himself, but I'm quite certain he has nothing but respect as he mops the floor with your ignorant whining. Did I mention you should be bitch slapped a grow some skin?
Branner's last visit was two weeks ago.
Either he didn't read his PM, or he just doesn't care what happens here.
Both his websites look like this.
A handful of members who have been there for years and have all racked up thousands and thousands of posts do ALL the discussing.
Not because there aren't another 1680 or 2500 members who are interested in discussing climate change.
It is because very few people want to be insulted by scientifically illiterate trolls.
Maybe you should stop insulting people, you scientifically illiterate troll.
Says the nuclear scientist who claims that the Earth is 6000 years old
I never made any such claim. You are hallucinating again. The age of Earth is unknown.
LOL the age of the Earth is older than the oldest rocks which are 4.7 billion years old.
Silly
IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.
According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC
This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop
I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.
ULTRA MAGA
"Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA
So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic?
Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy
Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL |
| 03-12-2023 04:58 |
IBdaMann★★★★★
(14932) |
Swan wrote:LOL the age of the Earth is older than the oldest rocks which are 4.7 billion years old.
I think you meant to write "3.7 Billion" as opposed to "4.7 Billion".
What dating method was used and what was the margin of error? |
| RE: oldest fossilized ecosystems 3900 million years old03-12-2023 08:36 |
Im a BM★★★★☆
(1622) |
IBdaMann wrote:
Swan wrote:LOL the age of the Earth is older than the oldest rocks which are 4.7 billion years old.
I think you meant to write "3.7 Billion" as opposed to "4.7 Billion".
What dating method was used and what was the margin of error?
The oldest known rocks are just shy of 4000 million years old.
The earth itself is closer to 4700 million years old.
The oldest fossilized ecosystems are only slightly younger than the oldest rocks of any kind.
Banded iron formations, of the microbanded variety, were deposited in at least three distinct locations, as long ago as 3900 million years ago.
Banded iron formations of the microbanded variety are the fossilized remnants of photosynthetic communities, and ecosystem community succession between two different kinds of anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria.
During periods of volcanic activity, the atmosphere was full of hydrogen. The most competitive photosynthetic communitiy was one that used hydrogen as reductant for anoxygenic photosynthesis.
When enough time without volcanic activity passed for the hydrogen to be depleted, the competitive advantage went to the photosynthetic community that used hydrogen sulfide as reductant for anoxygenic photosynthesis.
Back and forth, time and time again, leaving banded iron formations as the remnants of the sediments they deposited. |
| 04-12-2023 15:34 |
Swan★★★★★
(6003) |
IBdaMann wrote:
Swan wrote:LOL the age of the Earth is older than the oldest rocks which are 4.7 billion years old.
I think you meant to write "3.7 Billion" as opposed to "4.7 Billion".
What dating method was used and what was the margin of error?
1. You do not think, you merely respond like a shark sniffing blood.
2. I did read an article several years ago where the oldest rocks were pushed back to 4.7 billion years by radiometric dating, however now I am only seeing 4.2/4.3 billion years for the oldest rock.
3. How old is the oldest thing in the world?
5 to 7 billion years ago
Scientists with the University of Chicago and Field Museum have discovered stardust that formed 5 to 7 billion years ago—the oldest solid material ever found on Earth.
IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD.
According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC
This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop
I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.
ULTRA MAGA
"Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA
So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic?
Sonia makes me so proud to be a dumb white boy
Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL |
| RE: It started with an accident04-05-2024 22:15 |
sealover★★★★☆
(1771) |
It started with an accident.
IBM and ITN were discussing, to the best of their ability, natural selection of traits in animals.
ITN said, "..alligators, being amphibians, blah blah blah"
In a soon-following post IBM was asked if he believed that alligators are amphibians.
They are not, was IBM's assertion at the time.
In a days later later post, ITN was asked if he stood by the assertion that alligators are amphibians.
Yes, they are, according the resident science expert.
Then IBM was asked if he agreed that the assertion that alligators are amphibians is correct.
Yes, it was. Alligators are amphibians.
It was hideously funny.
Here is a piece of that high point in climate-debate.com history
-------------------------------------------------------------
Swan wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Swan wrote: Please be patient with the resident schizzo
sealover wrote:Word games - "amphibious" versus amphibian.
Yes. Amphibious. That is the word in the question. No rational, honest adult would deny that some reptiles are amphibious. Ergo, looking at your denial, the natural conclusion is that you are not rational and honest.
You both had PLENTY of opportunity to acknowledge that alligators are amphibious ... but you both fight tooth and nail to portray alligators as NOT amphibious because they are reptiles.
What more should I expect from schizzos who believe that mangroves will save the ocean, or that the US government hires Putin to put our satellites into orbit, or that transporting sea water to the desert will terraform sand into fertile farms, or that people can teleport wherever using quantum entanglement?
... and now reptiles, such as alligators and snakes, somehow cannot be amphibious because they are reptiles.
You guys are geniuses. From now on, I take notes on everything you write.
I notice that neither of you have nary a peep for the images I present to you. You deny them because they are rather inconvenient. You want to claim that reptiles cannot be amphibious yet here you have images clearly showing amphibious reptiles ... so you descend into your word games and pretend the agreed-upon context for the discussion is the Wikipedia taxonomy.
Word games.
Would I be correct in assuming that you also deny that ducks are amphibious?
Would I be correct in presuming that you deny the amphibious nature of otters?
You guys didn't get very far in school, did you? You never learned what "amphibious" means and now you are too terrified to look it up.
[ Y O U * R E A L L Y * A R E * F A R * T O O * E M B A R R A S S E D ]
[ T O * A N S W E R * T H E * Q U E S T I O N * H O N E S T L Y ]
[ * S O * Y O U * P L A Y * Y O U R * S I L L Y * W O R D * G A M E S ]
.
Again simpleton amphibians have gills as juveniles and alligators hatch with fully formed air breathing lungs from an egg and as such alligators are reptiles not amphibians
LOL otters are placental mammals not amphibians, every third grader knows this, so please complete third grade before responding and mocking your mother more than you already have. Or did you already kill your mother and father? |
| 05-05-2024 00:33 |
Into the Night★★★★★
(22820) |
Swan wrote:
LOL the age of the Earth is older than the oldest rocks which are 4.7 billion years old.
Silly
The age of the Earth is unknown.
The age of the 'oldest rocks' is unknown.
The Parrot Killer
Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles
Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan
While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
| 05-05-2024 00:40 |
Into the Night★★★★★
(22820) |
Im a BM wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Swan wrote:LOL the age of the Earth is older than the oldest rocks which are 4.7 billion years old.
I think you meant to write "3.7 Billion" as opposed to "4.7 Billion".
What dating method was used and what was the margin of error?
The oldest known rocks are just shy of 4000 million years old.
The age of the 'oldest rocks' is unknown.
Im a BM wrote:
The earth itself is closer to 4700 million years old.
The age of the Earth is unknown.
Im a BM wrote:
The oldest fossilized ecosystems are only slightly younger than the oldest rocks of any kind.
There is no such thing as a 'fossilized ecosystem'. Buzzword fallacy.
Im a BM wrote:
Banded iron formations, of the microbanded variety, were deposited in at least three distinct locations, as long ago as 3900 million years ago.
There is no such thing as a 'banded iron formation'. Buzzword fallacy.
Im a BM wrote:
Banded iron formations of the microbanded variety are the fossilized remnants of photosynthetic communities, and ecosystem community succession between two different kinds of anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria.
Photosynthesis produces oxygen.
Im a BM wrote:
During periods of volcanic activity, the atmosphere was full of hydrogen.
Volcanoes generally put out carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide.
Im a BM wrote:
The most competitive photosynthetic communitiy was one that used hydrogen as reductant for anoxygenic photosynthesis.
Photosynthesis gets it's hydrogen from water.
Im a BM wrote:
When enough time without volcanic activity
Volcanoes are still active.
Im a BM wrote:
passed for the hydrogen to be depleted,
Hydrogen is not 'depleted'.
Im a BM wrote:
the competitive advantage went to the photosynthetic community that used hydrogen sulfide as reductant for anoxygenic photosynthesis.
Hydrogen sulfide is not used in photosynthesis.
Im a BM wrote:
Back and forth, time and time again, leaving banded iron formations as the remnants of the sediments they deposited.
Hydrogen is not iron. Sulfur is not iron.
The Parrot Killer
Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles
Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan
While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
| 05-05-2024 00:43 |
Into the Night★★★★★
(22820) |
Swan wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Swan wrote:LOL the age of the Earth is older than the oldest rocks which are 4.7 billion years old.
I think you meant to write "3.7 Billion" as opposed to "4.7 Billion".
What dating method was used and what was the margin of error?
1. You do not think, you merely respond like a shark sniffing blood.
Cliche fallacy.
Swan wrote:
2. I did read an article several years ago where the oldest rocks were pushed back to 4.7 billion years by radiometric dating, however now I am only seeing 4.2/4.3 billion years for the oldest rock.
The age of the 'oldest rock' is unknown.
Swan wrote:
3. How old is the oldest thing in the world?
Unknown.
Swan wrote:
5 to 7 billion years ago
Scientists with the University of Chicago and Field Museum have discovered stardust that formed 5 to 7 billion years ago—the oldest solid material ever found on Earth.
The University of Chicago didn't exist 5 billion years ago. It was founded in 1890.
The Parrot Killer
Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles
Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan
While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
| 05-05-2024 00:54 |
Into the Night★★★★★
(22820) |
sealover wrote:
It started with an accident.
No, it started with another one of your redefinition fallacies.
sealover wrote:
IBM and ITN were discussing, to the best of their ability, natural selection of traits in animals.
The Theory of Natural Selection has been falsified since it does not pass the internal consistency check. 'Natural selection' is not a trait.
sealover wrote:
ITN said, "..alligators, being amphibians, blah blah blah"
In a soon-following post IBM was asked if he believed that alligators are amphibians.
They are not, was IBM's assertion at the time.
Alligators and crocodiles are amphibians.
sealover wrote:
In a days later later post, ITN was asked if he stood by the assertion that alligators are amphibians.
They are.
sealover wrote:
Yes, they are, according the resident science expert.
Science is not 'experts'. The word 'amphibian' is not defined by science.
sealover wrote:
Then IBM was asked if he agreed that the assertion that alligators are amphibians is correct.
Yes, it was. Alligators are amphibians.
Yes they are.
sealover wrote:
It was hideously funny.
Do you find alligators funny? They can be. Alligators will mistake a golf ball for one of it's eggs, for example, and even try to hatch it and defend it.
sealover wrote:
Again simpleton amphibians have gills as juveniles
Amphibians don't need gills. You are describing fish.
sealover wrote:
and alligators hatch with fully formed air breathing lungs from an egg and as such alligators are reptiles not amphibians
Alligators are amphibians.
sealover wrote:
LOL otters are placental mammals not amphibians,
Otters are amphibians. So are seals, walruses, etc.
sealover wrote:
every third grader knows this,
You don't get to speak for everyone. You only get to speak for you. Omniscience fallacy.
Attempted proof by X grade (omniscience).
The Parrot Killer
Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles
Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan
While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
| RE: Is this how you "dox" someone?05-05-2024 21:04 |
Im a BM★★★★☆
(1622) |
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:Just BEGGING to get doxxed!
Wrong wording. You INSISTED on publishing your own personal information.
An image search on your continuum graphic, as you demanded, reveals your name, Robert R. Northup, which you can see on the image. (Time: 14 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Biogeochemist" basically reveals that you live in Oakland. (Time: 17 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Oakland address" lists 4551 Fairbairn Ave, Oakland, CA without having to even click on any links. (Time: 6 seconds)
Google maps immediately comes up with THIS, indicating that you have a nice silver Lexus RX330, a Chevy 1500HD and a covered motorcycle. (Time: 5 seconds)
Anyway, anyone who is willing to spend a minute complying with your demands will learn at least this much about you.
--------------------
Is this how you "dox" someone?
Definitely displays a knowledge of "science" superior to all others. |
| 05-05-2024 23:10 |
Into the Night★★★★★
(22820) |
Im a BM wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:Just BEGGING to get doxxed!
Wrong wording. You INSISTED on publishing your own personal information.
An image search on your continuum graphic, as you demanded, reveals your name, Robert R. Northup, which you can see on the image. (Time: 14 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Biogeochemist" basically reveals that you live in Oakland. (Time: 17 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Oakland address" lists 4551 Fairbairn Ave, Oakland, CA without having to even click on any links. (Time: 6 seconds)
Google maps immediately comes up with THIS, indicating that you have a nice silver Lexus RX330, a Chevy 1500HD and a covered motorcycle. (Time: 5 seconds)
Anyway, anyone who is willing to spend a minute complying with your demands will learn at least this much about you.
--------------------
Is this how you "dox" someone?
Definitely displays a knowledge of "science" superior to all others.
Science isn't doxing yourself.
The Parrot Killer
Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles
Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan
While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
| RE: "Science isn't doxing yourself"06-05-2024 17:22 |
Im a BM★★★★☆
(1622) |
Into the Night wrote:
Im a BM wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:Just BEGGING to get doxxed!
Wrong wording. You INSISTED on publishing your own personal information.
An image search on your continuum graphic, as you demanded, reveals your name, Robert R. Northup, which you can see on the image. (Time: 14 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Biogeochemist" basically reveals that you live in Oakland. (Time: 17 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Oakland address" lists 4551 Fairbairn Ave, Oakland, CA without having to even click on any links. (Time: 6 seconds)
Google maps immediately comes up with THIS, indicating that you have a nice silver Lexus RX330, a Chevy 1500HD and a covered motorcycle. (Time: 5 seconds)
Anyway, anyone who is willing to spend a minute complying with your demands will learn at least this much about you.
--------------------
Is this how you "dox" someone?
Definitely displays a knowledge of "science" superior to all others.
Science isn't doxing yourself.
"Science isn't doxing yourself" - ITN
No, science is not that.
From what I have learned here, science is not a LOT of things.
There is an incredibly long list of everything that science is NOT.
And the list just gets longer.
So, to clear up any confusion.
Everyone who thought that science IS doxing yourself now knows that they were wrong.
I did a poor job doxing myself in this case.
I haven't lived in Oakland since 2003.
But there must be some value to the discussion to have posted this, right?
I mean, it isn't SPAM, right?
So, it's okay. |
| RE: No moderator means no guard rails09-05-2024 00:20 |
Im a BM★★★★☆
(1622) |
No moderator means no guard rails.
A conscious moderator would ban a member who repeatedly publishes personal private information about another member.
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:Just BEGGING to get doxxed!
Wrong wording. You INSISTED on publishing your own personal information.
An image search on your continuum graphic, as you demanded, reveals your name, Robert R. Northup, which you can see on the image. (Time: 14 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Biogeochemist" basically reveals that you live in Oakland. (Time: 17 seconds)
An internet search on "Robert R Northup Oakland address" lists 4551 Fairbairn Ave, Oakland, CA without having to even click on any links. (Time: 6 seconds)
Google maps immediately comes up with THIS, indicating that you have a nice silver Lexus RX330, a Chevy 1500HD and a covered motorcycle. (Time: 5 seconds)
Anyway, anyone who is willing to spend a minute complying with your demands will learn at least this much about you. |
| 09-05-2024 04:53 |
IBdaMann★★★★★
(14932) |
Im a BM wrote: No moderator means no guard rails.
To whomever is reading this, Robert Northup is complaining that this site does not come with leftist censors (which he euphemistically calls 'moderators') who will ban other posters upon his request.
I kid you not; he's that much of a cry-baby.
Im a BM wrote:A conscious moderator would ban a member who repeatedly publishes personal private information about another member.
To whomever is reading this, Robert Northup is trying to blame me for all the information about himself that he put on the internet.
For example, he demanded everybody look up graphic artwork that he created, that has his name on it. Robert provided all the information to find his "continuum" (which he was selling, but couldn't sell). Those who took him up on his demand learned his name.
A Google search immediately reveals his California address, cell phone carrier, his ads for tutoring at $25/hour, and myriads of associations with online organizations.
His address reveals Google street views of his apartment. A lookup reveals his cell phone number.
... and the kicker ... he wants you to blame me for his demand that everyone go out and learn more about him.
Edited on 09-05-2024 04:55 |
| 10-05-2024 02:50 |
Im a BM★★★★☆
(1622) |
It sounds like IBdaMann had no choice in the matter.
He was forced to look up a graphic, and then take extra steps to enlarge it enough to see the name of the author.
At that point, he had no choice other than to do a search on that name, and publish everything he could find.
[b]
"... and the kicker ... he wants you to blame me for his demand that everyone go out and learn more about him." - IBdaMann[/b]
When an Internet troll bullies so much that another member has no choice but to dox him.
Just look at what IBdaMann was forced to do.
And now he is being forced to make threats of publishing the phone number again (Branner deleted it last time in a very rare act of moderation), because... well, what choice does he have in the face of this kind of bully trolling?
Someone owes HIM an apology.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote: No moderator means no guard rails.
To whomever is reading this, Robert Northup is complaining that this site does not come with leftist censors (which he euphemistically calls 'moderators') who will ban other posters upon his request.
I kid you not; he's that much of a cry-baby.
Im a BM wrote:A conscious moderator would ban a member who repeatedly publishes personal private information about another member.
To whomever is reading this, Robert Northup is trying to blame me for all the information about himself that he put on the internet.
For example, he demanded everybody look up graphic artwork that he created, that has his name on it. Robert provided all the information to find his "continuum" (which he was selling, but couldn't sell). Those who took him up on his demand learned his name.
A Google search immediately reveals his California address, cell phone carrier, his ads for tutoring at $25/hour, and myriads of associations with online organizations.
His address reveals Google street views of his apartment. A lookup reveals his cell phone number.
... and the kicker ... he wants you to blame me for his demand that everyone go out and learn more about him. |
| 10-05-2024 03:25 |
Into the Night★★★★★
(22820) |
Im a BM wrote:
It sounds like IBdaMann had no choice in the matter.
He was forced to look up a graphic, and then take extra steps to enlarge it enough to see the name of the author.
At that point, he had no choice other than to do a search on that name, and publish everything he could find.
[b]
"... and the kicker ... he wants you to blame me for his demand that everyone go out and learn more about him." - IBdaMann[/b]
When an Internet troll bullies so much that another member has no choice but to dox him.
Just look at what IBdaMann was forced to do.
And now he is being forced to make threats of publishing the phone number again (Branner deleted it last time in a very rare act of moderation), because... well, what choice does he have in the face of this kind of bully trolling?
Someone owes HIM an apology.
Why should IBDaMann apologize for YOUR problem?
The Parrot Killer
Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles
Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan
While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/sea-otter-swimming-in-blue-water-526331839-854a624208854ebc8473530b28ade5b8.jpg)
