Relativity theory

Xadoman wrote:
Also , if something is rotating around its axis then all the points on its equator should average out to be at the same speed. With moon we clearly see that some points face the earth constantly, so they run constantly at lover speed compared to the points at the other side of the moon. Therefore the moon simply can not rotate over its axis.

I intended to be explicit on this point as may be judged from the following quotation: "The unfailing test of the spinning of a mass is, however, the existence of energy of motion. The moon is not posest of such vis viva." By this I meant that "axial rotation" is not simply "rotation upon an axis nonchalantly defined in dictionaries, but is a circular motion in the true physical sense — that is, one in which half the product of the mass with the square of velocity is a definite and positive quantity. The moon is a nearly spherical body, of a radius of about 1,087.5 miles, from which I calculate its volume to be approximately 5,300,216,300 cubic miles. Since its mean density is 3.27, one cubic foot of material composing it weighs close on 205 lbs. Accordingly, the total weight of the satellite is about 79,969,000,000,000,000,000, and its mass 2,483,500,000,000,000,000 terrestrial short tons. Assuming that the moon does physically rotate upon its axis, it performs one revolution in 27 days, 7 hours, 43 minutes and 11 seconds, or 2,360,591 seconds. If, in conformity with mathematical principles, we imagine the entire mass concentrated at a distance from the center equal to two-fifths of the radius, then the calculated rotational velocity is 3.04 feet per second, at which the globe would contain 11,474,000,000,000,000,000 short foot tons of energy sufficient to run 1,000,000,000 horsepower for a period of 1,323 years. Now, I say, that there is not enough of that energy in the moon to run a delicate watch.

Xadoman wrote:
Check out this quote from Tesla , Swan:

I intended to be explicit on this point as may be judged from the following quotation: "The unfailing test of the spinning of a mass is, however, the existence of energy of motion. The moon is not posest of such vis viva." By this I meant that "axial rotation" is not simply "rotation upon an axis nonchalantly defined in dictionaries, but is a circular motion in the true physical sense — that is, one in which half the product of the mass with the square of velocity is a definite and positive quantity. The moon is a nearly spherical body, of a radius of about 1,087.5 miles, from which I calculate its volume to be approximately 5,300,216,300 cubic miles. Since its mean density is 3.27, one cubic foot of material composing it weighs close on 205 lbs. Accordingly, the total weight of the satellite is about 79,969,000,000,000,000,000, and its mass 2,483,500,000,000,000,000 terrestrial short tons. Assuming that the moon does physically rotate upon its axis, it performs one revolution in 27 days, 7 hours, 43 minutes and 11 seconds, or 2,360,591 seconds. If, in conformity with mathematical principles, we imagine the entire mass concentrated at a distance from the center equal to two-fifths of the radius, then the calculated rotational velocity is 3.04 feet per second, at which the globe would contain 11,474,000,000,000,000,000 short foot tons of energy sufficient to run 1,000,000,000 horsepower for a period of 1,323 years. Now, I say, that there is not enough of that energy in the moon to run a delicate watch.

Do not you agree that there is a big difference between 1000000000 hp for 1323 years and zero?
How does it feel to be fooled by mainstream media? Did you also fell for covid scam?

Nikola Tesla the Croatian scientist who got his ass kicked by Edison and who believed in beaming millions of volts thru the air.

At First, Nikola Tesla was brilliant. And not just like a word, brilliant, either - I mean like, "holy crap my head just exploded (from all the awesome)" brilliant. The Croatian-born engineer spoke eight languages, almost single-handedly developed technology that harnessed the power of electricity for household use, and invented things like electrical generators, FM radio, remote control, robots, spark plugs, fluorescent lights, and giant-ass machines that shoot enormous, brain-frying lightning bolts all over the place like crazy. He had an unyielding, steel-trap photographic memory and an insane ability to visualize even the most complex pieces of machinery – the guy did advanced calculus and physics equations in his damn head, memorized entire books at a time, and successfully pulled off scientific experiments that modern-day technology STILL can't replicate. For instance, in 2007 a group of lesser geniuses at MIT got all pumped up out of their minds because they wirelessly transmitted energy a seven feet through the air. Nikola Tesla once lit 200 lightbulbs from a power source 26 miles away, and he did it in 1899 with a machine he built from spare parts in the middle of the god-forsaken desert. To this day, nobody can really figure out how the hell he pulled that shit off, because two-thirds of the schematics only existed in the darkest recesses of Tesla's all-powerful brain.

If Edison had a needle to find in a haystack, he would proceed at once with the diligence of the bee to examine straw after straw until he found the object of his search. ... I was a sorry witness of such doings, knowing that a little theory and calculation would have saved him ninety per cent of his labor."

Xadoman wrote:

Nikola Tesla the Croatian scientist who got his ass kicked by Edison and who believed in beaming millions of volts thru the air.

Tesla is the inventor of the modern world. A a quote about Tesla:

At First, Nikola Tesla was brilliant. And not just like a word, brilliant, either - I mean like, "holy crap my head just exploded (from all the awesome)" brilliant. The Croatian-born engineer spoke eight languages, almost single-handedly developed technology that harnessed the power of electricity for household use, and invented things like electrical generators, FM radio, remote control, robots, spark plugs, fluorescent lights, and giant-ass machines that shoot enormous, brain-frying lightning bolts all over the place like crazy. He had an unyielding, steel-trap photographic memory and an insane ability to visualize even the most complex pieces of machinery – the guy did advanced calculus and physics equations in his damn head, memorized entire books at a time, and successfully pulled off scientific experiments that modern-day technology STILL can't replicate. For instance, in 2007 a group of lesser geniuses at MIT got all pumped up out of their minds because they wirelessly transmitted energy a seven feet through the air. Nikola Tesla once lit 200 lightbulbs from a power source 26 miles away, and he did it in 1899 with a machine he built from spare parts in the middle of the god-forsaken desert. To this day, nobody can really figure out how the hell he pulled that shit off, because two-thirds of the schematics only existed in the darkest recesses of Tesla's all-powerful brain.

Esison on the other hand did not even invented the light bulb. He bought the idea from some English inventor, I do not remeber the name.

Swan wrote:
Xadoman wrote:
Nikola Tesla the Croatian scientist who got his ass kicked by Edison and who believed in beaming millions of volts thru the air.

GretaGroupie wrote:

Swan wrote:
Xadoman wrote:
Nikola Tesla the Croatian scientist who got his ass kicked by Edison and who believed in beaming millions of volts thru the air.

I used to have a Nikola phone. Now I have an LG.

Swan wrote:

Xadoman wrote:
Check out this quote from Tesla , Swan:

I intended to be explicit on this point as may be judged from the following quotation: "The unfailing test of the spinning of a mass is, however, the existence of energy of motion. The moon is not posest of such vis viva." By this I meant that "axial rotation" is not simply "rotation upon an axis nonchalantly defined in dictionaries, but is a circular motion in the true physical sense — that is, one in which half the product of the mass with the square of velocity is a definite and positive quantity. The moon is a nearly spherical body, of a radius of about 1,087.5 miles, from which I calculate its volume to be approximately 5,300,216,300 cubic miles. Since its mean density is 3.27, one cubic foot of material composing it weighs close on 205 lbs. Accordingly, the total weight of the satellite is about 79,969,000,000,000,000,000, and its mass 2,483,500,000,000,000,000 terrestrial short tons. Assuming that the moon does physically rotate upon its axis, it performs one revolution in 27 days, 7 hours, 43 minutes and 11 seconds, or 2,360,591 seconds. If, in conformity with mathematical principles, we imagine the entire mass concentrated at a distance from the center equal to two-fifths of the radius, then the calculated rotational velocity is 3.04 feet per second, at which the globe would contain 11,474,000,000,000,000,000 short foot tons of energy sufficient to run 1,000,000,000 horsepower for a period of 1,323 years. Now, I say, that there is not enough of that energy in the moon to run a delicate watch.

Do not you agree that there is a big difference between 1000000000 hp for 1323 years and zero?
How does it feel to be fooled by mainstream media? Did you also fell for covid scam?

Tesla refers to 2 things.

1. An electric car company that would not exist except for government subsidies on every poorly made car.

2. Nikola Tesla the Croatian scientist who got his ass kicked by Edison and who believed in beaming millions of volts thru the air.

Not sure how either of these entities effect the rotation of the moon on it's axis.

CIAO

Xadoman wrote:

Nikola Tesla the Croatian scientist who got his ass kicked by Edison and who believed in beaming millions of volts thru the air.

Tesla is the inventor of the modern world. A a quote about Tesla:

At First, Nikola Tesla was brilliant. And not just like a word, brilliant, either - I mean like, "holy crap my head just exploded (from all the awesome)" brilliant. The Croatian-born engineer spoke eight languages, almost single-handedly developed technology that harnessed the power of electricity for household use, and invented things like electrical generators, FM radio, remote control, robots, spark plugs, fluorescent lights, and giant-ass machines that shoot enormous, brain-frying lightning bolts all over the place like crazy. He had an unyielding, steel-trap photographic memory and an insane ability to visualize even the most complex pieces of machinery – the guy did advanced calculus and physics equations in his damn head, memorized entire books at a time, and successfully pulled off scientific experiments that modern-day technology STILL can't replicate. For instance, in 2007 a group of lesser geniuses at MIT got all pumped up out of their minds because they wirelessly transmitted energy a seven feet through the air. Nikola Tesla once lit 200 lightbulbs from a power source 26 miles away, and he did it in 1899 with a machine he built from spare parts in the middle of the god-forsaken desert. To this day, nobody can really figure out how the hell he pulled that shit off, because two-thirds of the schematics only existed in the darkest recesses of Tesla's all-powerful brain.

Xadoman wrote:
Esison on the other hand did not even invented the light bulb. He bought the idea from some English inventor, I do not remeber the name.

Swan wrote:

Xadoman wrote:

Nikola Tesla the Croatian scientist who got his ass kicked by Edison and who believed in beaming millions of volts thru the air.

Tesla is the inventor of the modern world. A a quote about Tesla:

At First, Nikola Tesla was brilliant. And not just like a word, brilliant, either - I mean like, "holy crap my head just exploded (from all the awesome)" brilliant. The Croatian-born engineer spoke eight languages, almost single-handedly developed technology that harnessed the power of electricity for household use, and invented things like electrical generators, FM radio, remote control, robots, spark plugs, fluorescent lights, and giant-ass machines that shoot enormous, brain-frying lightning bolts all over the place like crazy. He had an unyielding, steel-trap photographic memory and an insane ability to visualize even the most complex pieces of machinery – the guy did advanced calculus and physics equations in his damn head, memorized entire books at a time, and successfully pulled off scientific experiments that modern-day technology STILL can't replicate. For instance, in 2007 a group of lesser geniuses at MIT got all pumped up out of their minds because they wirelessly transmitted energy a seven feet through the air. Nikola Tesla once lit 200 lightbulbs from a power source 26 miles away, and he did it in 1899 with a machine he built from spare parts in the middle of the god-forsaken desert. To this day, nobody can really figure out how the hell he pulled that shit off, because two-thirds of the schematics only existed in the darkest recesses of Tesla's all-powerful brain.

Esison on the other hand did not even invented the light bulb. He bought the idea from some English inventor, I do not remeber the name.

Which does not mean that the moon is connected to the Earth by spokes as your Tesla link claimed nor does it mean that you have proved by inferencing Tesla that the moon does not rotate on it's own axis as it clearly does once just over every 27 days

GretaGroupie wrote:

Swan wrote:
Xadoman wrote:
Nikola Tesla the Croatian scientist who got his ass kicked by Edison and who believed in beaming millions of volts thru the air.

I used to have a Nikola phone. Now I have an LG.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Xadoman wrote:
Check out this quote from Tesla , Swan:

I intended to be explicit on this point as may be judged from the following quotation: "The unfailing test of the spinning of a mass is, however, the existence of energy of motion. The moon is not posest of such vis viva." By this I meant that "axial rotation" is not simply "rotation upon an axis nonchalantly defined in dictionaries, but is a circular motion in the true physical sense — that is, one in which half the product of the mass with the square of velocity is a definite and positive quantity. The moon is a nearly spherical body, of a radius of about 1,087.5 miles, from which I calculate its volume to be approximately 5,300,216,300 cubic miles. Since its mean density is 3.27, one cubic foot of material composing it weighs close on 205 lbs. Accordingly, the total weight of the satellite is about 79,969,000,000,000,000,000, and its mass 2,483,500,000,000,000,000 terrestrial short tons. Assuming that the moon does physically rotate upon its axis, it performs one revolution in 27 days, 7 hours, 43 minutes and 11 seconds, or 2,360,591 seconds. If, in conformity with mathematical principles, we imagine the entire mass concentrated at a distance from the center equal to two-fifths of the radius, then the calculated rotational velocity is 3.04 feet per second, at which the globe would contain 11,474,000,000,000,000,000 short foot tons of energy sufficient to run 1,000,000,000 horsepower for a period of 1,323 years. Now, I say, that there is not enough of that energy in the moon to run a delicate watch.

Do not you agree that there is a big difference between 1000000000 hp for 1323 years and zero?
How does it feel to be fooled by mainstream media? Did you also fell for covid scam?

Tesla refers to 2 things.

1. An electric car company that would not exist except for government subsidies on every poorly made car.

2. Nikola Tesla the Croatian scientist who got his ass kicked by Edison and who believed in beaming millions of volts thru the air.

Not sure how either of these entities effect the rotation of the moon on it's axis.

CIAO

Nikola Tesla actually kicked Edison's ass. Edison's direct current system for power distribution isn't used anymore.

You don't beam any voltage through the air. It's possible to beam power though. Tesla showed how, but it not used to distribute power for various practical reasons.

Still, you can charge your Apple IPhone wirelessly.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Xadoman wrote:
Check out this quote from Tesla , Swan:

I intended to be explicit on this point as may be judged from the following quotation: "The unfailing test of the spinning of a mass is, however, the existence of energy of motion. The moon is not posest of such vis viva." By this I meant that "axial rotation" is not simply "rotation upon an axis nonchalantly defined in dictionaries, but is a circular motion in the true physical sense — that is, one in which half the product of the mass with the square of velocity is a definite and positive quantity. The moon is a nearly spherical body, of a radius of about 1,087.5 miles, from which I calculate its volume to be approximately 5,300,216,300 cubic miles. Since its mean density is 3.27, one cubic foot of material composing it weighs close on 205 lbs. Accordingly, the total weight of the satellite is about 79,969,000,000,000,000,000, and its mass 2,483,500,000,000,000,000 terrestrial short tons. Assuming that the moon does physically rotate upon its axis, it performs one revolution in 27 days, 7 hours, 43 minutes and 11 seconds, or 2,360,591 seconds. If, in conformity with mathematical principles, we imagine the entire mass concentrated at a distance from the center equal to two-fifths of the radius, then the calculated rotational velocity is 3.04 feet per second, at which the globe would contain 11,474,000,000,000,000,000 short foot tons of energy sufficient to run 1,000,000,000 horsepower for a period of 1,323 years. Now, I say, that there is not enough of that energy in the moon to run a delicate watch.

Do not you agree that there is a big difference between 1000000000 hp for 1323 years and zero?
How does it feel to be fooled by mainstream media? Did you also fell for covid scam?

Tesla refers to 2 things.

1. An electric car company that would not exist except for government subsidies on every poorly made car.

2. Nikola Tesla the Croatian scientist who got his ass kicked by Edison and who believed in beaming millions of volts thru the air.

Not sure how either of these entities effect the rotation of the moon on it's axis.

CIAO

Nikola Tesla actually kicked Edison's ass. Edison's direct current system for power distribution isn't used anymore.

You don't beam any voltage through the air. It's possible to beam power though. Tesla showed how, but it not used to distribute power for various practical reasons.

Still, you can charge your Apple IPhone wirelessly.

LOL actually Direct current is used in any electronic device with a battery for a power source.

Swan wrote:
It is also used to charge batteries, so rechargeable devices like laptops and cell phones come with an AC adapter that converts alternating current to direct current.

Swan wrote:
LOL number two, lightning bolts can be 300 million VOLTS.
...deleted insult...

Into the Night wrote:It is possible to induce a lightning strike from cloud to ground at much lower voltages

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Xadoman wrote:
Check out this quote from Tesla , Swan:

I intended to be explicit on this point as may be judged from the following quotation: "The unfailing test of the spinning of a mass is, however, the existence of energy of motion. The moon is not posest of such vis viva." By this I meant that "axial rotation" is not simply "rotation upon an axis nonchalantly defined in dictionaries, but is a circular motion in the true physical sense — that is, one in which half the product of the mass with the square of velocity is a definite and positive quantity. The moon is a nearly spherical body, of a radius of about 1,087.5 miles, from which I calculate its volume to be approximately 5,300,216,300 cubic miles. Since its mean density is 3.27, one cubic foot of material composing it weighs close on 205 lbs. Accordingly, the total weight of the satellite is about 79,969,000,000,000,000,000, and its mass 2,483,500,000,000,000,000 terrestrial short tons. Assuming that the moon does physically rotate upon its axis, it performs one revolution in 27 days, 7 hours, 43 minutes and 11 seconds, or 2,360,591 seconds. If, in conformity with mathematical principles, we imagine the entire mass concentrated at a distance from the center equal to two-fifths of the radius, then the calculated rotational velocity is 3.04 feet per second, at which the globe would contain 11,474,000,000,000,000,000 short foot tons of energy sufficient to run 1,000,000,000 horsepower for a period of 1,323 years. Now, I say, that there is not enough of that energy in the moon to run a delicate watch.

Do not you agree that there is a big difference between 1000000000 hp for 1323 years and zero?
How does it feel to be fooled by mainstream media? Did you also fell for covid scam?

Tesla refers to 2 things.

1. An electric car company that would not exist except for government subsidies on every poorly made car.

2. Nikola Tesla the Croatian scientist who got his ass kicked by Edison and who believed in beaming millions of volts thru the air.

Not sure how either of these entities effect the rotation of the moon on it's axis.

CIAO

Nikola Tesla actually kicked Edison's ass. Edison's direct current system for power distribution isn't used anymore.

You don't beam any voltage through the air. It's possible to beam power though. Tesla showed how, but it not used to distribute power for various practical reasons.

Still, you can charge your Apple IPhone wirelessly.

LOL actually Direct current is used in any electronic device with a battery for a power source.

Pivot fallacy. I'm talking about distribution systems to homes and businesses, dumbass.

Swan wrote:
It is also used to charge batteries, so rechargeable devices like laptops and cell phones come with an AC adapter that converts alternating current to direct current.

If the home current was DC, that would be a LOT HARDER JOB. As it is, a small plastic box contains all the simple components needed.

Swan wrote:
LOL number two, lightning bolts can be 300 million VOLTS.
...deleted insult...

No. Lightning bolts are not voltage. They are an arc.

The voltage between cloud and ground (the higher voltage to create such an arc) is around 100 million volts. Once the stroke occurs, this voltage drops off rapidly. The plasma that the air has become will continue to conduct the arc for quite some time, long enough to leave a very bright light. The thermal shock you hear is the thunder. A lightning bolt is power, not voltage.

Obviously, you have no idea how a capacitor works, or anything about Ohm's law, or even what voltage is, what current is, what resistance is, or what power is.

A much smaller version of the same thing happens in a car, with the spark plugs. The coil converts a 12 volt pulse to about 1000v to induce the arc. Once the arc forms, voltage essentially drops to less than a volt, but current increases a lot. Again, the arc itself is a manifestation of power, not voltage or current.

Cloud to cloud potential only needs about 10 million volts for the arc to occur.

It is possible to induce a lightning strike from cloud to ground at much lower voltages by using a rocket attached to a tracer wire. Some lightning research was done this way.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Xadoman wrote:
Check out this quote from Tesla , Swan:

I intended to be explicit on this point as may be judged from the following quotation: "The unfailing test of the spinning of a mass is, however, the existence of energy of motion. The moon is not posest of such vis viva." By this I meant that "axial rotation" is not simply "rotation upon an axis nonchalantly defined in dictionaries, but is a circular motion in the true physical sense — that is, one in which half the product of the mass with the square of velocity is a definite and positive quantity. The moon is a nearly spherical body, of a radius of about 1,087.5 miles, from which I calculate its volume to be approximately 5,300,216,300 cubic miles. Since its mean density is 3.27, one cubic foot of material composing it weighs close on 205 lbs. Accordingly, the total weight of the satellite is about 79,969,000,000,000,000,000, and its mass 2,483,500,000,000,000,000 terrestrial short tons. Assuming that the moon does physically rotate upon its axis, it performs one revolution in 27 days, 7 hours, 43 minutes and 11 seconds, or 2,360,591 seconds. If, in conformity with mathematical principles, we imagine the entire mass concentrated at a distance from the center equal to two-fifths of the radius, then the calculated rotational velocity is 3.04 feet per second, at which the globe would contain 11,474,000,000,000,000,000 short foot tons of energy sufficient to run 1,000,000,000 horsepower for a period of 1,323 years. Now, I say, that there is not enough of that energy in the moon to run a delicate watch.

Do not you agree that there is a big difference between 1000000000 hp for 1323 years and zero?
How does it feel to be fooled by mainstream media? Did you also fell for covid scam?

Tesla refers to 2 things.

1. An electric car company that would not exist except for government subsidies on every poorly made car.

2. Nikola Tesla the Croatian scientist who got his ass kicked by Edison and who believed in beaming millions of volts thru the air.

Not sure how either of these entities effect the rotation of the moon on it's axis.

CIAO

Nikola Tesla actually kicked Edison's ass. Edison's direct current system for power distribution isn't used anymore.

You don't beam any voltage through the air. It's possible to beam power though. Tesla showed how, but it not used to distribute power for various practical reasons.

Still, you can charge your Apple IPhone wirelessly.

LOL actually Direct current is used in any electronic device with a battery for a power source.

Pivot fallacy. I'm talking about distribution systems to homes and businesses, dumbass.

Swan wrote:
It is also used to charge batteries, so rechargeable devices like laptops and cell phones come with an AC adapter that converts alternating current to direct current.

If the home current was DC, that would be a LOT HARDER JOB. As it is, a small plastic box contains all the simple components needed.

Swan wrote:
LOL number two, lightning bolts can be 300 million VOLTS.
...deleted insult...

No. Lightning bolts are not voltage. They are an arc.

The voltage between cloud and ground (the higher voltage to create such an arc) is around 100 million volts. Once the stroke occurs, this voltage drops off rapidly. The plasma that the air has become will continue to conduct the arc for quite some time, long enough to leave a very bright light. The thermal shock you hear is the thunder. A lightning bolt is power, not voltage.

Obviously, you have no idea how a capacitor works, or anything about Ohm's law, or even what voltage is, what current is, what resistance is, or what power is.

A much smaller version of the same thing happens in a car, with the spark plugs. The coil converts a 12 volt pulse to about 1000v to induce the arc. Once the arc forms, voltage essentially drops to less than a volt, but current increases a lot. Again, the arc itself is a manifestation of power, not voltage or current.

Cloud to cloud potential only needs about 10 million volts for the arc to occur.

It is possible to induce a lightning strike from cloud to ground at much lower voltages by using a rocket attached to a tracer wire. Some lightning research was done this way.

Actually dopey you said that direct current isn't used anymore

Swan wrote:
because you are a psychotic knucklehead who has no clue as to what is real.

Swan wrote:
So do you ever get tired of constantly testing instead of actually living?

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Xadoman wrote:
Check out this quote from Tesla , Swan:

I intended to be explicit on this point as may be judged from the following quotation: "The unfailing test of the spinning of a mass is, however, the existence of energy of motion. The moon is not posest of such vis viva." By this I meant that "axial rotation" is not simply "rotation upon an axis nonchalantly defined in dictionaries, but is a circular motion in the true physical sense — that is, one in which half the product of the mass with the square of velocity is a definite and positive quantity. The moon is a nearly spherical body, of a radius of about 1,087.5 miles, from which I calculate its volume to be approximately 5,300,216,300 cubic miles. Since its mean density is 3.27, one cubic foot of material composing it weighs close on 205 lbs. Accordingly, the total weight of the satellite is about 79,969,000,000,000,000,000, and its mass 2,483,500,000,000,000,000 terrestrial short tons. Assuming that the moon does physically rotate upon its axis, it performs one revolution in 27 days, 7 hours, 43 minutes and 11 seconds, or 2,360,591 seconds. If, in conformity with mathematical principles, we imagine the entire mass concentrated at a distance from the center equal to two-fifths of the radius, then the calculated rotational velocity is 3.04 feet per second, at which the globe would contain 11,474,000,000,000,000,000 short foot tons of energy sufficient to run 1,000,000,000 horsepower for a period of 1,323 years. Now, I say, that there is not enough of that energy in the moon to run a delicate watch.

Do not you agree that there is a big difference between 1000000000 hp for 1323 years and zero?
How does it feel to be fooled by mainstream media? Did you also fell for covid scam?

Tesla refers to 2 things.

1. An electric car company that would not exist except for government subsidies on every poorly made car.

2. Nikola Tesla the Croatian scientist who got his ass kicked by Edison and who believed in beaming millions of volts thru the air.

Not sure how either of these entities effect the rotation of the moon on it's axis.

CIAO

Nikola Tesla actually kicked Edison's ass. Edison's direct current system for power distribution isn't used anymore.

You don't beam any voltage through the air. It's possible to beam power though. Tesla showed how, but it not used to distribute power for various practical reasons.

Still, you can charge your Apple IPhone wirelessly.

LOL actually Direct current is used in any electronic device with a battery for a power source.

Pivot fallacy. I'm talking about distribution systems to homes and businesses, dumbass.

Swan wrote:
It is also used to charge batteries, so rechargeable devices like laptops and cell phones come with an AC adapter that converts alternating current to direct current.

If the home current was DC, that would be a LOT HARDER JOB. As it is, a small plastic box contains all the simple components needed.

Swan wrote:
LOL number two, lightning bolts can be 300 million VOLTS.
...deleted insult...

No. Lightning bolts are not voltage. They are an arc.

The voltage between cloud and ground (the higher voltage to create such an arc) is around 100 million volts. Once the stroke occurs, this voltage drops off rapidly. The plasma that the air has become will continue to conduct the arc for quite some time, long enough to leave a very bright light. The thermal shock you hear is the thunder. A lightning bolt is power, not voltage.

Obviously, you have no idea how a capacitor works, or anything about Ohm's law, or even what voltage is, what current is, what resistance is, or what power is.

A much smaller version of the same thing happens in a car, with the spark plugs. The coil converts a 12 volt pulse to about 1000v to induce the arc. Once the arc forms, voltage essentially drops to less than a volt, but current increases a lot. Again, the arc itself is a manifestation of power, not voltage or current.

Cloud to cloud potential only needs about 10 million volts for the arc to occur.

It is possible to induce a lightning strike from cloud to ground at much lower voltages by using a rocket attached to a tracer wire. Some lightning research was done this way.

Actually dopey you said that direct current isn't used anymore

Never said any such thing. Direct current is no longer used for power distribution to homes and businesses.

Swan wrote:
because you are a psychotic knucklehead who has no clue as to what is real.

Insult fallacy. Buzzword fallacy. Void argument fallacy. You have no clue what 'real' means.

Swan wrote:
So do you ever get tired of constantly testing instead of actually living?

Nonsense phrase. Ignored.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

So do you ever get tired of constantly testing instead of actually living?

Nonsense phrase. Ignored.

LOL you can not respond to a phrase, quote the phrase and ignore it because you have already responded to the phrase.

Seriously is it fun doing everything that you are told without having to think on your own?

How come there are no new pics of your padded room

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

So do you ever get tired of constantly testing instead of actually living?

Nonsense phrase. Ignored.

LOL you can not respond to a phrase, quote the phrase and ignore it because you have already responded to the phrase.

Seriously is it fun doing everything that you are told without having to think on your own?

How come there are no new pics of your padded room

Attempted defense of nonsense. Random phrases. Insult fallacies. No argument presented.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

So do you ever get tired of constantly testing instead of actually living?

Nonsense phrase. Ignored.

LOL you can not respond to a phrase, quote the phrase and ignore it because you have already responded to the phrase.

Seriously is it fun doing everything that you are told without having to think on your own?

How come there are no new pics of your padded room

Attempted defense of nonsense. Random phrases. Insult fallacies. No argument presented.

I do not argue with schizzos, however they can be quite entertaining

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

So do you ever get tired of constantly testing instead of actually living?

Nonsense phrase. Ignored.

LOL you can not respond to a phrase, quote the phrase and ignore it because you have already responded to the phrase.

Seriously is it fun doing everything that you are told without having to think on your own?

How come there are no new pics of your padded room

Attempted defense of nonsense. Random phrases. Insult fallacies. No argument presented.

I do not argue with schizzos, however they can be quite entertaining

Psychoquackery. No argument presented. Trolling.

Into the Night wrote:
Are you thinking of Nikon?

GretaGroupie wrote:

Into the Night wrote:
Are you thinking of Nikon?

Oopsy.... Nokia!

That was my ditzy blonde gean kicking in ITN!

Into the Night wrote:
Ah yes...that was it! Nice looking gal you found for that image.

GretaGroupie wrote:- it's all in how you accessorize and primp)

IBdaMann wrote:

duncan61 wrote:
I have all Milwaukee stuff Dewalt can be good stuff as well

Xadoman wrote:Lets throw in some more proof that the moon does not rotate.

duncan61 wrote:
I have always wondered about this.thank you.Where I am now has tides up to 10 metres

Xadoman wrote:
IbdaMann, please explain how come the moon constantly drifts away from the earth but somehow miracously maintains the swiss clockwork accurate sync in its rotational and orbital period. Do you belive in higher forces which constantly fine tunes the rotational speed of the moon? Or is is more logical that the moon does not rotate anymore as its rotation has been despun a long time ago by tidal forces and it only orbits around the earth( and does not rotate around its axis).
I admit the whole thing is quite a mind f..ck because it indeed seems that the moon rotates in absolute context but as Tesla has explained in his writings, the moon does not have a rotational energy to power a single swiss clockwork. It is easily provable buy experimentations with rotating and orbiting models using the law of conservation of energy. In his writings he also did the math ( for math geeks who are able to understand it). I have previously posted links to his writings so I am not going to do it again.

Xadoman wrote:

duncan61 wrote:
I have always wondered about this.thank you.Where I am now has tides up to 10 metres

Have you ever read the memoires of captain Bluffenstern. He anchored his sailer into some kind of fjord in Norway and the achor got wedged during the tide and his boat rose up like a fishing float because the anchor chain was also too short.

Xadoman wrote:
IbdaMann, please explain how ....

Obviously you have a lot of difficulty with spatial relationship problems.

The moon is a nearly spherical body, of a radius of about 1,087.5 miles, from which I calculate its volume to be approximately 5,300,216,300 cubic miles. Since its mean density is 3.27, one cubic foot of material composing it weighs close on 205 lbs. Accordingly, the total weight of the satellite is about 79,969,000,000,000,000,000, and its mass 2,483,500,000,000,000,000 terrestrial short tons. Assuming that the moon does physically rotate upon its axis, it performs one revolution in 27 days, 7 hours, 43 minutes and 11 seconds, or 2,360,591 seconds. If, in conformity with mathematical principles, we imagine the entire mass concentrated at a distance from the center equal to two-fifths of the radius, then the calculated rotational velocity is 3.04 feet per second, at which the globe would contain 11,474,000,000,000,000,000 short foot tons of energy sufficient to run 1,000,000,000 horsepower for a period of 1,323 years. Now, I say, that there is not enough of that energy in the moon to run a delicate watch.

IBdaMann wrote:

Xadoman wrote:
IbdaMann, please explain how ....

No, no, no, .....

It is your turn to explain this:

Your explanation is what comes next. The floor is yours.

Xadoman wrote:Do not you agree there is a big difference between the parts I bolded out? Are you still gonna say it is just a spatial problem and has nothing to do with creating energy out of nothing?

.

You are asking many questions that have been answered

run 1,000,000,000 horsepower for a period of 1,323 years.