Relativity theory

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:The Moon doesn't orbit Earth. They orbit each other around a point called a barycenter. Moon doesn't rotate around the Earth. It spins. The Moon is not inside the Earth.

As I already told you the moon rotates around the Earth every 27.3 days, I am not sure why you deny this.

There is a reason that you teach here and not at a University

Swan, you lose on this one. You should look up "barycenter."

Whenever you have two bodies, both masses contribute to the gravity between them and they both affect each other. Just because the moon's revolution around the barycenter involves far more movement than the earth's revolution around the barycenter, the earth is nonetheless moving around the barycenter.

.

Swan wrote:
Wrong as the Moon

1. Rotates on it's own axis

Swan wrote:2. Rotates around the Earth

Swan wrote: 3. Rotates around the Sun

Swan wrote: 4. Rotates around the Galaxy

Swan wrote:5. Moves in line with the Galaxy

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:The Moon doesn't orbit Earth. They orbit each other around a point called a barycenter. Moon doesn't rotate around the Earth. It spins. The Moon is not inside the Earth.

As I already told you the moon rotates around the Earth every 27.3 days, I am not sure why you deny this.

There is a reason that you teach here and not at a University

Swan, you lose on this one. You should look up "barycenter."

Whenever you have two bodies, both masses contribute to the gravity between them and they both affect each other. Just because the moon's revolution around the barycenter involves far more movement than the earth's revolution around the barycenter, the earth is nonetheless moving around the barycenter.

.

Wrong as the Moon

1. Rotates on it's own axis
2. Rotates around the Earth

Swan wrote:
3. Rotates around the Sun

Swan wrote:
4. Rotates around the Galaxy

Swan wrote:
5. Moves in line with the Galaxy

Swan wrote:
Not that you can comprehend any of this

Swan wrote:
LOL, actually there is nothing to win or lose here, in fact you lost your life long long ago, long before you checked in here

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:
Wrong as the Moon

1. Rotates on it's own axis

I realize that you aren't very good at math, but the moon is only one body. The topic of discussion is two bodies revolving around a barycenter.

Two ... not one. The moon is only one.

Swan wrote:2. Rotates around the Earth

Nope. I realize that you totally suck at English, to the extent that you don't understand how amphibious things are amphibians, so you get a pass here, I suppose.

The moon and the earth revolve around the barycenter.

The concept differs not from the Olympic hammer throw. Both the thrower and the hammer revolve around the barycenter which is a few inches out from the throwers chest.

Swan wrote: 3. Rotates around the Sun

The planets and the sun all revolve around a barycenter.

Swan wrote: 4. Rotates around the Galaxy

Probably (but revolves), but we're speculating.

Swan wrote:5. Moves in line with the Galaxy

Whatever that means, but you are probably incorrect. Our galaxy is probably orbiting (revolving around) the barycenter of some other cluster of solar systems or huge black hole or something.

I apologize for my 18-volt DEWALT "mind" boring holes through your delusion.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:The Moon doesn't orbit Earth. They orbit each other around a point called a barycenter. Moon doesn't rotate around the Earth. It spins. The Moon is not inside the Earth.

As I already told you the moon rotates around the Earth every 27.3 days, I am not sure why you deny this.

There is a reason that you teach here and not at a University

Swan, you lose on this one. You should look up "barycenter."

Whenever you have two bodies, both masses contribute to the gravity between them and they both affect each other. Just because the moon's revolution around the barycenter involves far more movement than the earth's revolution around the barycenter, the earth is nonetheless moving around the barycenter.

.

Wrong as the Moon

1. Rotates on it's own axis
2. Rotates around the Earth

The Moon does not rotate around the Earth. Earth is not inside the Moon.

Swan wrote:
3. Rotates around the Sun

The Sun isn't inside the Moon either.

Swan wrote:
4. Rotates around the Galaxy

The Galaxy isn't inside the Moon either.

Swan wrote:
5. Moves in line with the Galaxy

The Galaxy doesn't move in a straight line.

Swan wrote:
Not that you can comprehend any of this

Apparently YOU can't.

Swan wrote:
LOL, actually there is nothing to win or lose here, in fact you lost your life long long ago, long before you checked in here

Nope. Still here.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:The Moon doesn't orbit Earth. They orbit each other around a point called a barycenter. Moon doesn't rotate around the Earth. It spins. The Moon is not inside the Earth.

As I already told you the moon rotates around the Earth every 27.3 days, I am not sure why you deny this.

There is a reason that you teach here and not at a University

Swan, you lose on this one. You should look up "barycenter."

Whenever you have two bodies, both masses contribute to the gravity between them and they both affect each other. Just because the moon's revolution around the barycenter involves far more movement than the earth's revolution around the barycenter, the earth is nonetheless moving around the barycenter.

.

Wrong as the Moon

1. Rotates on it's own axis
2. Rotates around the Earth

The Moon does not rotate around the Earth. Earth is not inside the Moon.

Swan wrote:
3. Rotates around the Sun

The Sun isn't inside the Moon either.

Swan wrote:
4. Rotates around the Galaxy

The Galaxy isn't inside the Moon either.

Swan wrote:
5. Moves in line with the Galaxy

The Galaxy doesn't move in a straight line.

Swan wrote:
Not that you can comprehend any of this

Apparently YOU can't.

Swan wrote:
LOL, actually there is nothing to win or lose here, in fact you lost your life long long ago, long before you checked in here

Nope. Still here.

Wrong as the Moon

1. Rotates on it's own axis
2. Rotates around the Earth
3. Rotates around the Sun
4. Rotates around the Galaxy
5. Moves in line with the Galaxy

Not that you can comprehend any of this

However please keep right on babbling as it is quite amusing

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:The Moon doesn't orbit Earth. They orbit each other around a point called a barycenter. Moon doesn't rotate around the Earth. It spins. The Moon is not inside the Earth.

As I already told you the moon rotates around the Earth every 27.3 days, I am not sure why you deny this.

There is a reason that you teach here and not at a University

Swan, you lose on this one. You should look up "barycenter."

Whenever you have two bodies, both masses contribute to the gravity between them and they both affect each other. Just because the moon's revolution around the barycenter involves far more movement than the earth's revolution around the barycenter, the earth is nonetheless moving around the barycenter.

.

Wrong as the Moon

1. Rotates on it's own axis
2. Rotates around the Earth

The Moon does not rotate around the Earth. Earth is not inside the Moon.

Swan wrote:
3. Rotates around the Sun

The Sun isn't inside the Moon either.

Swan wrote:
4. Rotates around the Galaxy

The Galaxy isn't inside the Moon either.

Swan wrote:
5. Moves in line with the Galaxy

The Galaxy doesn't move in a straight line.

Swan wrote:
Not that you can comprehend any of this

Apparently YOU can't.

Swan wrote:
LOL, actually there is nothing to win or lose here, in fact you lost your life long long ago, long before you checked in here

Nope. Still here.

Wrong as the Moon

1. Rotates on it's own axis
2. Rotates around the Earth
3. Rotates around the Sun
4. Rotates around the Galaxy
5. Moves in line with the Galaxy

Not that you can comprehend any of this

However please keep right on babbling as it is quite amusing

Still insisting that you do not understand English. I know you have a lot of trouble with this language. Repeating your own illiteracy is not helping you.

Earth is not inside the Moon. Neither is the Sun nor any galaxy. Orbits do not occur in a straight line.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:The Moon doesn't orbit Earth. They orbit each other around a point called a barycenter. Moon doesn't rotate around the Earth. It spins. The Moon is not inside the Earth.

As I already told you the moon rotates around the Earth every 27.3 days, I am not sure why you deny this.

There is a reason that you teach here and not at a University

Swan, you lose on this one. You should look up "barycenter."

Whenever you have two bodies, both masses contribute to the gravity between them and they both affect each other. Just because the moon's revolution around the barycenter involves far more movement than the earth's revolution around the barycenter, the earth is nonetheless moving around the barycenter.

.

Wrong as the Moon

1. Rotates on it's own axis
2. Rotates around the Earth

The Moon does not rotate around the Earth. Earth is not inside the Moon.

Swan wrote:
3. Rotates around the Sun

The Sun isn't inside the Moon either.

Swan wrote:
4. Rotates around the Galaxy

The Galaxy isn't inside the Moon either.

Swan wrote:
5. Moves in line with the Galaxy

The Galaxy doesn't move in a straight line.

Swan wrote:
Not that you can comprehend any of this

Apparently YOU can't.

Swan wrote:
LOL, actually there is nothing to win or lose here, in fact you lost your life long long ago, long before you checked in here

Nope. Still here.

Wrong as the Moon

1. Rotates on it's own axis
2. Rotates around the Earth
3. Rotates around the Sun
4. Rotates around the Galaxy
5. Moves in line with the Galaxy

Not that you can comprehend any of this

However please keep right on babbling as it is quite amusing

Still insisting that you do not understand English. I know you have a lot of trouble with this language. Repeating your own illiteracy is not helping you.

Earth is not inside the Moon. Neither is the Sun nor any galaxy. Orbits do not occur in a straight line.

Your babbles about the Moon being inside the Earth change nothing. Seriously I hope that you did not study long to be such a failure.

The Moon

1. Rotates on it's own axis
2. Rotates around the Earth
3. Rotates around the Sun
4. Rotates around the Galaxy
5. Moves in line with the Galaxy

Not that you can comprehend any of this

However please keep right on babbling as it is quite amusing

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:The Moon doesn't orbit Earth. They orbit each other around a point called a barycenter. Moon doesn't rotate around the Earth. It spins. The Moon is not inside the Earth.

As I already told you the moon rotates around the Earth every 27.3 days, I am not sure why you deny this.

There is a reason that you teach here and not at a University

Swan, you lose on this one. You should look up "barycenter."

Whenever you have two bodies, both masses contribute to the gravity between them and they both affect each other. Just because the moon's revolution around the barycenter involves far more movement than the earth's revolution around the barycenter, the earth is nonetheless moving around the barycenter.

.

Wrong as the Moon

1. Rotates on it's own axis
2. Rotates around the Earth

The Moon does not rotate around the Earth. Earth is not inside the Moon.

Swan wrote:
3. Rotates around the Sun

The Sun isn't inside the Moon either.

Swan wrote:
4. Rotates around the Galaxy

The Galaxy isn't inside the Moon either.

Swan wrote:
5. Moves in line with the Galaxy

The Galaxy doesn't move in a straight line.

Swan wrote:
Not that you can comprehend any of this

Apparently YOU can't.

Swan wrote:
LOL, actually there is nothing to win or lose here, in fact you lost your life long long ago, long before you checked in here

Nope. Still here.

Wrong as the Moon

1. Rotates on it's own axis
2. Rotates around the Earth
3. Rotates around the Sun
4. Rotates around the Galaxy
5. Moves in line with the Galaxy

Not that you can comprehend any of this

However please keep right on babbling as it is quite amusing

Still insisting that you do not understand English. I know you have a lot of trouble with this language. Repeating your own illiteracy is not helping you.

Earth is not inside the Moon. Neither is the Sun nor any galaxy. Orbits do not occur in a straight line.

Your babbles about the Moon being inside the Earth change nothing. Seriously I hope that you did not study long to be such a failure.

The Moon

1. Rotates on it's own axis
2. Rotates around the Earth
3. Rotates around the Sun
4. Rotates around the Galaxy
5. Moves in line with the Galaxy

Not that you can comprehend any of this

However please keep right on babbling as it is quite amusing

I never said the Moon was inside the Earth. Word stuffing.
YOU said the Earth is inside the Moon. It isn't.
YOU said the Sun is inside the Moon. It isn't.
YOU said the Galaxy was inside the Moon. It isn't.

You can't blame YOUR problems in anybody else.

Swan wrote:LOL the doctor is getting really really desperate at this point, as I obviously never said that the Earth is inside the Moon,

Swan wrote: ... or that the Sun is inside the Moon,

Swan wrote:... or that the galaxy was inside the Moon.

Swan wrote: What I said is ...

1. Rotates on it's own axis
2. Rotates around the Earth
3. Rotates around the Sun
4. Rotates around the Galaxy

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:LOL the doctor is getting really really desperate at this point, as I obviously never said that the Earth is inside the Moon,

Yes, you did. You insist that the moon rotates around the earth. That implies that the earth is the center of the moon.

You may not realize what your words mean due to your English language deficiencies and shortcomings, but nonetheless, that is what you said, and yes, it's a very stupid thing to say.

Again, I would recommend you look up the words "rotate" and "revolve" and note the difference.

Swan wrote: ... or that the Sun is inside the Moon,

Yes, you said that too.

Again, I would recommend you look up the words "rotate" and "revolve" and note the difference.

Swan wrote:... or that the galaxy was inside the Moon.

Yup, you said that as well. I bet you wish you could take all of those back.

Good news! You can. You get unlimited do-overs. If you ever need a do-over voucher, let me know.

Swan wrote: What I said is ...

1. Rotates on it's own axis
2. Rotates around the Earth
3. Rotates around the Sun
4. Rotates around the Galaxy

Exactly ... these statements require the earth, the sun and the galaxy to be the center of rotation for the moon. It's what the words mean.

Did you mean "revolve"?

Question: Do you know why a six-gun is called a "revolver" and not a "rotator"?
Answer: The bullets revolve around the axis of the drum, they don't rotate around it.

Don't be afraid to come to me with the tough stuff ... even if it's easy tough stuff.

.

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:LOL the doctor is getting really really desperate at this point, as I obviously never said that the Earth is inside the Moon,

Yes, you did. You insist that the moon rotates around the earth. That implies that the earth is the center of the moon.

You may not realize what your words mean due to your English language deficiencies and shortcomings, but nonetheless, that is what you said, and yes, it's a very stupid thing to say.

Again, I would recommend you look up the words "rotate" and "revolve" and note the difference.

Swan wrote: ... or that the Sun is inside the Moon,

Yes, you said that too.

Again, I would recommend you look up the words "rotate" and "revolve" and note the difference.

Swan wrote:... or that the galaxy was inside the Moon.

Yup, you said that as well. I bet you wish you could take all of those back.

Good news! You can. You get unlimited do-overs. If you ever need a do-over voucher, let me know.

Swan wrote: What I said is ...

1. Rotates on it's own axis
2. Rotates around the Earth
3. Rotates around the Sun
4. Rotates around the Galaxy

Exactly ... these statements require the earth, the sun and the galaxy to be the center of rotation for the moon. It's what the words mean.

Did you mean "revolve"?

Question: Do you know why a six-gun is called a "revolver" and not a "rotator"?
Answer: The bullets revolve around the axis of the drum, they don't rotate around it.

Don't be afraid to come to me with the tough stuff ... even if it's easy tough stuff.

.

Lets try this in kindergarten terms so that you can understand.

1. The Moon is locked into Earth orbit, 2,300MPH

Swan wrote:
2. The Earth and Moon are locked into the Sun's orbit, 67,000MPH

Swan wrote:
3. The Sun, Earth and Moon are locked into the Galactic cores orbit, 500,000 MPH

Swan wrote:
4. The Galaxy is in it's own motion thru space taking everything we know with it, 1,300,000MPH

Swan wrote:
5. All this motion has your neurons even more frustrated than normal.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:LOL the doctor is getting really really desperate at this point, as I obviously never said that the Earth is inside the Moon,

Yes, you did. You insist that the moon rotates around the earth. That implies that the earth is the center of the moon.

You may not realize what your words mean due to your English language deficiencies and shortcomings, but nonetheless, that is what you said, and yes, it's a very stupid thing to say.

Again, I would recommend you look up the words "rotate" and "revolve" and note the difference.

Swan wrote: ... or that the Sun is inside the Moon,

Yes, you said that too.

Again, I would recommend you look up the words "rotate" and "revolve" and note the difference.

Swan wrote:... or that the galaxy was inside the Moon.

Yup, you said that as well. I bet you wish you could take all of those back.

Good news! You can. You get unlimited do-overs. If you ever need a do-over voucher, let me know.

Swan wrote: What I said is ...

1. Rotates on it's own axis
2. Rotates around the Earth
3. Rotates around the Sun
4. Rotates around the Galaxy

Exactly ... these statements require the earth, the sun and the galaxy to be the center of rotation for the moon. It's what the words mean.

Did you mean "revolve"?

Question: Do you know why a six-gun is called a "revolver" and not a "rotator"?
Answer: The bullets revolve around the axis of the drum, they don't rotate around it.

Don't be afraid to come to me with the tough stuff ... even if it's easy tough stuff.

.

Lets try this in kindergarten terms so that you can understand.

1. The Moon is locked into Earth orbit, 2,300MPH

Compared to what? The Moon is not the Earth.

Swan wrote:
2. The Earth and Moon are locked into the Sun's orbit, 67,000MPH

Compared to what? The Earth and Moon are not the Sun.

Swan wrote:
3. The Sun, Earth and Moon are locked into the Galactic cores orbit, 500,000 MPH

Compared to what? The Sun, Earth, and Moon are not the Galactic core.

Swan wrote:
4. The Galaxy is in it's own motion thru space taking everything we know with it, 1,300,000MPH

Compared to what?

Swan wrote:
5. All this motion has your neurons even more frustrated than normal.

What motion?

Apparently you have no concept of what speed actually means.

Xadoman wrote:
So which is it guys, does the moon have zero angular momentum or would it be enough to run 1,000,000,000 horsepower for a period of 1,323 years. Do not you think there is big difference between those energy levels or do you still think it is just a spatial comprehension problem? Are you guys still trying to create energy out of nothing?
Imagine the probability for rotational and orbiting period to be exactly the same for moon anno domini 2022 given the moon has drifted away from earth 3.8cm/per year for millions of years. Guess what, other sattelites are orbiting the same way as moon as well. Imagine the probability of this kind on coincidence!!! Going to the casino and taking out jackpot is like taking a candy from the kid compared to this kind on coincidences.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:LOL the doctor is getting really really desperate at this point, as I obviously never said that the Earth is inside the Moon,

Yes, you did. You insist that the moon rotates around the earth. That implies that the earth is the center of the moon.

You may not realize what your words mean due to your English language deficiencies and shortcomings, but nonetheless, that is what you said, and yes, it's a very stupid thing to say.

Again, I would recommend you look up the words "rotate" and "revolve" and note the difference.

Swan wrote: ... or that the Sun is inside the Moon,

Yes, you said that too.

Again, I would recommend you look up the words "rotate" and "revolve" and note the difference.

Swan wrote:... or that the galaxy was inside the Moon.

Yup, you said that as well. I bet you wish you could take all of those back.

Good news! You can. You get unlimited do-overs. If you ever need a do-over voucher, let me know.

Swan wrote: What I said is ...

1. Rotates on it's own axis
2. Rotates around the Earth
3. Rotates around the Sun
4. Rotates around the Galaxy

Exactly ... these statements require the earth, the sun and the galaxy to be the center of rotation for the moon. It's what the words mean.

Did you mean "revolve"?

Question: Do you know why a six-gun is called a "revolver" and not a "rotator"?
Answer: The bullets revolve around the axis of the drum, they don't rotate around it.

Don't be afraid to come to me with the tough stuff ... even if it's easy tough stuff.

.

Lets try this in kindergarten terms so that you can understand.

1. The Moon is locked into Earth orbit, 2,300MPH

Compared to what? The Moon is not the Earth.

Swan wrote:
2. The Earth and Moon are locked into the Sun's orbit, 67,000MPH

Compared to what? The Earth and Moon are not the Sun.

Swan wrote:
3. The Sun, Earth and Moon are locked into the Galactic cores orbit, 500,000 MPH

Compared to what? The Sun, Earth, and Moon are not the Galactic core.

Swan wrote:
4. The Galaxy is in it's own motion thru space taking everything we know with it, 1,300,000MPH

Compared to what?

Swan wrote:
5. All this motion has your neurons even more frustrated than normal.

What motion?

Apparently you have no concept of what speed actually means.

Lets try this in kindergarten terms so that you can understand.

1. The Moon is locked into Earth orbit, 2,300MPH
2. The Earth and Moon are locked into the Sun's orbit, 67,000MPH
3. The Sun, Earth and Moon are locked into the Galactic cores orbit, 500,000 MPH
4. The Galaxy is in it's own motion thru space taking everything we know with it, 1,300,000MPH
5. All this motion has your neurons even more frustrated than normal.

LOL if you keep this up long enough you will frustrate yourself, so smile and be happy

Swan wrote:

Xadoman wrote:
So which is it guys, does the moon have zero angular momentum or would it be enough to run 1,000,000,000 horsepower for a period of 1,323 years. Do not you think there is big difference between those energy levels or do you still think it is just a spatial comprehension problem? Are you guys still trying to create energy out of nothing?
Imagine the probability for rotational and orbiting period to be exactly the same for moon anno domini 2022 given the moon has drifted away from earth 3.8cm/per year for millions of years. Guess what, other sattelites are orbiting the same way as moon as well. Imagine the probability of this kind on coincidence!!! Going to the casino and taking out jackpot is like taking a candy from the kid compared to this kind on coincidences.

I think that you have a spatial comprehension problem.

The moons momentum is created by the Earth not the Moon, no matter what your Mom says

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:LOL the doctor is getting really really desperate at this point, as I obviously never said that the Earth is inside the Moon,

Yes, you did. You insist that the moon rotates around the earth. That implies that the earth is the center of the moon.

You may not realize what your words mean due to your English language deficiencies and shortcomings, but nonetheless, that is what you said, and yes, it's a very stupid thing to say.

Again, I would recommend you look up the words "rotate" and "revolve" and note the difference.

Swan wrote: ... or that the Sun is inside the Moon,

Yes, you said that too.

Again, I would recommend you look up the words "rotate" and "revolve" and note the difference.

Swan wrote:... or that the galaxy was inside the Moon.

Yup, you said that as well. I bet you wish you could take all of those back.

Good news! You can. You get unlimited do-overs. If you ever need a do-over voucher, let me know.

Swan wrote: What I said is ...

1. Rotates on it's own axis
2. Rotates around the Earth
3. Rotates around the Sun
4. Rotates around the Galaxy

Exactly ... these statements require the earth, the sun and the galaxy to be the center of rotation for the moon. It's what the words mean.

Did you mean "revolve"?

Question: Do you know why a six-gun is called a "revolver" and not a "rotator"?
Answer: The bullets revolve around the axis of the drum, they don't rotate around it.

Don't be afraid to come to me with the tough stuff ... even if it's easy tough stuff.

.

Lets try this in kindergarten terms so that you can understand.

1. The Moon is locked into Earth orbit, 2,300MPH

Compared to what? The Moon is not the Earth.

Swan wrote:
2. The Earth and Moon are locked into the Sun's orbit, 67,000MPH

Compared to what? The Earth and Moon are not the Sun.

Swan wrote:
3. The Sun, Earth and Moon are locked into the Galactic cores orbit, 500,000 MPH

Compared to what? The Sun, Earth, and Moon are not the Galactic core.

Swan wrote:
4. The Galaxy is in it's own motion thru space taking everything we know with it, 1,300,000MPH

Compared to what?

Swan wrote:
5. All this motion has your neurons even more frustrated than normal.

What motion?

Apparently you have no concept of what speed actually means.

Lets try this in kindergarten terms so that you can understand.

1. The Moon is locked into Earth orbit, 2,300MPH
2. The Earth and Moon are locked into the Sun's orbit, 67,000MPH
3. The Sun, Earth and Moon are locked into the Galactic cores orbit, 500,000 MPH
4. The Galaxy is in it's own motion thru space taking everything we know with it, 1,300,000MPH
5. All this motion has your neurons even more frustrated than normal.

LOL if you keep this up long enough you will frustrate yourself, so smile and be happy

Chanting. Evasion. Answer the questions put to you.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Xadoman wrote:
So which is it guys, does the moon have zero angular momentum or would it be enough to run 1,000,000,000 horsepower for a period of 1,323 years. Do not you think there is big difference between those energy levels or do you still think it is just a spatial comprehension problem? Are you guys still trying to create energy out of nothing?
Imagine the probability for rotational and orbiting period to be exactly the same for moon anno domini 2022 given the moon has drifted away from earth 3.8cm/per year for millions of years. Guess what, other sattelites are orbiting the same way as moon as well. Imagine the probability of this kind on coincidence!!! Going to the casino and taking out jackpot is like taking a candy from the kid compared to this kind on coincidences.

I think that you have a spatial comprehension problem.

The moons momentum is created by the Earth not the Moon, no matter what your Mom says

Nope. The Earth does not create any momentum for anything.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:LOL the doctor is getting really really desperate at this point, as I obviously never said that the Earth is inside the Moon,

Yes, you did. You insist that the moon rotates around the earth. That implies that the earth is the center of the moon.

You may not realize what your words mean due to your English language deficiencies and shortcomings, but nonetheless, that is what you said, and yes, it's a very stupid thing to say.

Again, I would recommend you look up the words "rotate" and "revolve" and note the difference.

Swan wrote: ... or that the Sun is inside the Moon,

Yes, you said that too.

Again, I would recommend you look up the words "rotate" and "revolve" and note the difference.

Swan wrote:... or that the galaxy was inside the Moon.

Yup, you said that as well. I bet you wish you could take all of those back.

Good news! You can. You get unlimited do-overs. If you ever need a do-over voucher, let me know.

Swan wrote: What I said is ...

1. Rotates on it's own axis
2. Rotates around the Earth
3. Rotates around the Sun
4. Rotates around the Galaxy

Exactly ... these statements require the earth, the sun and the galaxy to be the center of rotation for the moon. It's what the words mean.

Did you mean "revolve"?

Question: Do you know why a six-gun is called a "revolver" and not a "rotator"?
Answer: The bullets revolve around the axis of the drum, they don't rotate around it.

Don't be afraid to come to me with the tough stuff ... even if it's easy tough stuff.

.

Lets try this in kindergarten terms so that you can understand.

1. The Moon is locked into Earth orbit, 2,300MPH

Compared to what? The Moon is not the Earth.

Swan wrote:
2. The Earth and Moon are locked into the Sun's orbit, 67,000MPH

Compared to what? The Earth and Moon are not the Sun.

Swan wrote:
3. The Sun, Earth and Moon are locked into the Galactic cores orbit, 500,000 MPH

Compared to what? The Sun, Earth, and Moon are not the Galactic core.

Swan wrote:
4. The Galaxy is in it's own motion thru space taking everything we know with it, 1,300,000MPH

Compared to what?

Swan wrote:
5. All this motion has your neurons even more frustrated than normal.

What motion?

Apparently you have no concept of what speed actually means.

Lets try this in kindergarten terms so that you can understand.

1. The Moon is locked into Earth orbit, 2,300MPH
2. The Earth and Moon are locked into the Sun's orbit, 67,000MPH
3. The Sun, Earth and Moon are locked into the Galactic cores orbit, 500,000 MPH
4. The Galaxy is in it's own motion thru space taking everything we know with it, 1,300,000MPH
5. All this motion has your neurons even more frustrated than normal.

LOL if you keep this up long enough you will frustrate yourself, so smile and be happy

Chanting. Evasion. Answer the questions put to you.

You are a big and complete unimportant nothing. I have nothing to prove to anyone, and even less to prove to you.

Swan wrote:
You will never be in my position as you crave attention like a small child stomping their feet.
That said retards are kinda fun, and you are hysterical

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Xadoman wrote:
So which is it guys, does the moon have zero angular momentum or would it be enough to run 1,000,000,000 horsepower for a period of 1,323 years. Do not you think there is big difference between those energy levels or do you still think it is just a spatial comprehension problem? Are you guys still trying to create energy out of nothing?
Imagine the probability for rotational and orbiting period to be exactly the same for moon anno domini 2022 given the moon has drifted away from earth 3.8cm/per year for millions of years. Guess what, other sattelites are orbiting the same way as moon as well. Imagine the probability of this kind on coincidence!!! Going to the casino and taking out jackpot is like taking a candy from the kid compared to this kind on coincidences.

I think that you have a spatial comprehension problem.

The moons momentum is created by the Earth not the Moon, no matter what your Mom says

Nope. The Earth does not create any momentum for anything.

Actually the Moons momentum is created by the Earths gravitational field, but you know that and are just trying to frustrate yourself.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Xadoman wrote:
So which is it guys, does the moon have zero angular momentum or would it be enough to run 1,000,000,000 horsepower for a period of 1,323 years. Do not you think there is big difference between those energy levels or do you still think it is just a spatial comprehension problem? Are you guys still trying to create energy out of nothing?
Imagine the probability for rotational and orbiting period to be exactly the same for moon anno domini 2022 given the moon has drifted away from earth 3.8cm/per year for millions of years. Guess what, other sattelites are orbiting the same way as moon as well. Imagine the probability of this kind on coincidence!!! Going to the casino and taking out jackpot is like taking a candy from the kid compared to this kind on coincidences.

I think that you have a spatial comprehension problem.

The moons momentum is created by the Earth not the Moon, no matter what your Mom says

Nope. The Earth does not create any momentum for anything.

Actually the Moons momentum is created by the Earths gravitational field, but you know that and are just trying to frustrate yourself.

Nope. You cannot create energy out of nothing.

Swan wrote:Lets try this in kindergarten terms so that you can understand.

...

4. The Galaxy is in it's own motion thru space taking everything we know with it, 1,300,000MPH

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Lets try this in kindergarten terms so that you can understand.

...

4. The Galaxy is in it's own motion thru space taking everything we know with it, 1,300,000MPH

What makes you believe that the galaxy has that velocity?

Why should any rational adult believe this?

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Lets try this in kindergarten terms so that you can understand.

...

4. The Galaxy is in it's own motion thru space taking everything we know with it, 1,300,000MPH

What makes you believe that the galaxy has that velocity?

Why should any rational adult believe this?

LOL if the Earth had no velocity then you would fall off.

No matter you just create your own great science as you meander thru your wasted PhD sad life.

https://nightsky.jpl.nasa.gov/docs/HowFast.pdf

Rode 30 miles on the bicycle today, how about you girl?

Swan wrote:LOL if the Earth had no velocity then you would fall off.

Swan wrote:No matter you just create your own great science as you meander thru your wasted PhD sad life.

Swan posted:https://nightsky.jpl.nasa.gov/docs/HowFast.pdf

Swan wrote:Rode 30 miles on the bicycle today, how about you girl?

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Xadoman wrote:
So which is it guys, does the moon have zero angular momentum or would it be enough to run 1,000,000,000 horsepower for a period of 1,323 years. Do not you think there is big difference between those energy levels or do you still think it is just a spatial comprehension problem? Are you guys still trying to create energy out of nothing?
Imagine the probability for rotational and orbiting period to be exactly the same for moon anno domini 2022 given the moon has drifted away from earth 3.8cm/per year for millions of years. Guess what, other sattelites are orbiting the same way as moon as well. Imagine the probability of this kind on coincidence!!! Going to the casino and taking out jackpot is like taking a candy from the kid compared to this kind on coincidences.

I think that you have a spatial comprehension problem.

The moons momentum is created by the Earth not the Moon, no matter what your Mom says

Nope. The Earth does not create any momentum for anything.

Actually the Moons momentum is created by the Earths gravitational field, but you know that and are just trying to frustrate yourself.

Nope. You cannot create energy out of nothing.

Gravity most certainly creates momentum, every third grader knows this.

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Lets try this in kindergarten terms so that you can understand.

...

4. The Galaxy is in it's own motion thru space taking everything we know with it, 1,300,000MPH

What makes you believe that the galaxy has that velocity?

Why should any rational adult believe this?

LOL if the Earth had no velocity then you would fall off.

Swan wrote:
No matter you just create your own great science as you meander thru your wasted PhD sad life.
...deleted Holy Links...

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:LOL if the Earth had no velocity then you would fall off.

I can't wait to read this explanation. Please do tell.

Swan wrote:No matter you just create your own great science as you meander thru your wasted PhD sad life.

I have no credentials ... at least none that I will divulge. Treat me as though I were an eight-year-old third-grader turning to you for rational adult science explanations.

Swan posted:https://nightsky.jpl.nasa.gov/docs/HowFast.pdf

Why are posting government documents as though the government somehow knows everything? Would you post an equivalent document from HUD?

Aaaah, I see, you are an obedient slave to the government and to the Biden Administration. You have no choice.

You should have stated that up front.

Swan wrote:Rode 30 miles on the bicycle today, how about you girl?

I rewrote some Java "equals()" methods to eliminate null pointer exceptions. I also reviewed some systems architecture artifacts for transitioning to different views.

Not bad for an eight-year-old third-grader.

So, you learned to ride a two-wheel bicycle today? Good for you.

.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Xadoman wrote:
So which is it guys, does the moon have zero angular momentum or would it be enough to run 1,000,000,000 horsepower for a period of 1,323 years. Do not you think there is big difference between those energy levels or do you still think it is just a spatial comprehension problem? Are you guys still trying to create energy out of nothing?
Imagine the probability for rotational and orbiting period to be exactly the same for moon anno domini 2022 given the moon has drifted away from earth 3.8cm/per year for millions of years. Guess what, other sattelites are orbiting the same way as moon as well. Imagine the probability of this kind on coincidence!!! Going to the casino and taking out jackpot is like taking a candy from the kid compared to this kind on coincidences.

I think that you have a spatial comprehension problem.

The moons momentum is created by the Earth not the Moon, no matter what your Mom says

Nope. The Earth does not create any momentum for anything.

Actually the Moons momentum is created by the Earths gravitational field, but you know that and are just trying to frustrate yourself.

Nope. You cannot create energy out of nothing.

Gravity most certainly creates momentum, every third grader knows this.

You don't get to speak for every third grader. Omniscience fallacy.
Gravity does not create momentum either. You can't create energy out of nothing.

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:LOL if the Earth had no velocity then you would fall off.

I can't wait to read this explanation. Please do tell.

LOL you know full well that gravity holds everything down,

Swan wrote:It's ok to be jealous from the wheelchair that you fought so hard to earn

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:LOL if the Earth had no velocity then you would fall off.

I can't wait to read this explanation. Please do tell.

Swan wrote:No matter you just create your own great science as you meander thru your wasted PhD sad life.

I have no credentials ... at least none that I will divulge. Treat me as though I were an eight-year-old third-grader turning to you for rational adult science explanations.

Swan posted:https://nightsky.jpl.nasa.gov/docs/HowFast.pdf

Why are posting government documents as though the government somehow knows everything? Would you post an equivalent document from HUD?

Aaaah, I see, you are an obedient slave to the government and to the Biden Administration. You have no choice.

You should have stated that up front.

Swan wrote:Rode 30 miles on the bicycle today, how about you girl?

I rewrote some Java "equals()" methods to eliminate null pointer exceptions. I also reviewed some systems architecture artifacts for transitioning to different views.

Not bad for an eight-year-old third-grader.

So, you learned to ride a two-wheel bicycle today? Good for you.

.

LOL you know full well that gravity holds everything down,

Swan wrote:
now stop trying to frustrate yourself already.

Swan wrote:
LOL I rode 30 miles farther yesterday than you ever have, and my heartrate is way down.

Swan wrote:
It's ok to be jealous from the wheelchair that you fought so hard to earn

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Xadoman wrote:
So which is it guys, does the moon have zero angular momentum or would it be enough to run 1,000,000,000 horsepower for a period of 1,323 years. Do not you think there is big difference between those energy levels or do you still think it is just a spatial comprehension problem? Are you guys still trying to create energy out of nothing?
Imagine the probability for rotational and orbiting period to be exactly the same for moon anno domini 2022 given the moon has drifted away from earth 3.8cm/per year for millions of years. Guess what, other sattelites are orbiting the same way as moon as well. Imagine the probability of this kind on coincidence!!! Going to the casino and taking out jackpot is like taking a candy from the kid compared to this kind on coincidences.

I think that you have a spatial comprehension problem.

The moons momentum is created by the Earth not the Moon, no matter what your Mom says

Nope. The Earth does not create any momentum for anything.

Actually the Moons momentum is created by the Earths gravitational field, but you know that and are just trying to frustrate yourself.

Nope. You cannot create energy out of nothing.

Gravity most certainly creates momentum, every third grader knows this.

You don't get to speak for every third grader. Omniscience fallacy.
Gravity does not create momentum either. You can't create energy out of nothing.

Actually I am retired so I get to do whatever I choose.

Silly

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:LOL if the Earth had no velocity then you would fall off.

I can't wait to read this explanation. Please do tell.

LOL you know full well that gravity holds everything down,

I'm still waiting for the explanation. Are you saying that velocity is gravity?

Please explain such that your statements make sense. Take your meds first if necessary.

Swan wrote:It's ok to be jealous from the wheelchair that you fought so hard to earn

Envy? My motto is "work smarter, not harder"

.

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:LOL if the Earth had no velocity then you would fall off.

I can't wait to read this explanation. Please do tell.

LOL you know full well that gravity holds everything down,

I'm still waiting for the explanation. Are you saying that velocity is gravity?

When an object falls toward Earth it's velocity and momentum are both caused by gravity.

Xadoman wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Xadoman wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Xadoman wrote:
IbdaMann, please explain how ....

No, no, no, .....

It is your turn to explain this:

Your explanation is what comes next. The floor is yours.

Xadoman wrote:Do not you agree there is a big difference between the parts I bolded out? Are you still gonna say it is just a spatial problem and has nothing to do with creating energy out of nothing?

.

Now you are being dishonest, and this is not the first time.

You are asking many questions that have been answered and you are refusing to acknowledge that you fully understand the correct answer by ignoring your responsibility to explain this:

It's your turn to explain, not to ask questions.

Explain. The floor is yours.

This is not an answer - " hey, this is just a spatial problem, look, it obviously rotates".

Wrong explanation. This will be the third time I am posting this. You are intentionally EVADING.

Explain how the mon is not rotating. Don't pretend to state that the moon cannot do what this graphic demonstrates is obviously happening. You have to explain how this obvious rotation is somehow not rotation.

That is what you need to explain. Stay focused on the graphic.

The floor is yours.

Look it up at 4.45. According to relativity theory and Einstein, there is no such thing as gravity.

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:LOL if the Earth had no velocity then you would fall off.

I can't wait to read this explanation. Please do tell.

LOL you know full well that gravity holds everything down,

I'm still waiting for the explanation. Are you saying that velocity is gravity?

When an object falls toward Earth it's velocity and momentum are both caused by gravity.

Actually the velocity and momentum result from converting potential energy which is a question of position ... but stay focused ...

The question before you pertains to your comment above asserting that the earth's gravity is a result of the earth's velocity.

Please explain this.

.

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:LOL if the Earth had no velocity then you would fall off.

I can't wait to read this explanation. Please do tell.

LOL you know full well that gravity holds everything down,

I'm still waiting for the explanation. Are you saying that velocity is gravity?

When an object falls toward Earth it's velocity and momentum are both caused by gravity.

Actually the velocity and momentum result from converting potential energy which is a question of position ... but stay focused ...

The question before you pertains to your comment above asserting that the earth's gravity is a result of the earth's velocity.

Please explain this.

.

When an object falls toward Earth it's velocity and momentum are both caused by gravity.

Swan wrote:
That said without gravity condensing gasses and particles the Earth would have no spin
because there would be no Earth.

Swan wrote:
LOL your word salad's are no more explainable than those of Kamala Harris. Funny as all hell too.

LOL This is more fun than a test of the emergency jelly donut system

130

Swan wrote:LOL if the Earth had no velocity then you would fall off.