climate-debate.com awaits 100th new member since my first post

HarveyH55 wrote:
You are correct, climate change is a man made crisis. Fortunately, it's a market hype and hysteria crisis, and the planet is just doing what it has always done. Extreme weather has always plagued mankind, and well documented. As in the past, there are some who will seek to profit off the misery of others. Instead of designing ways to mitigate future extreme weather events, so the damage isn't as devastating. The doomsday-seekers use computer models, to create hysteria and panic, when the weather isn't so extreme. Not much of a prophet, since there is likely to be weather events, of cataclysmic proportions eventually. But, the cult claims that if enough people join, and enough money spent, they can prevent further deadly weather events. Of course, there are never enough 'believers', or enough money. The same theme, as any cult. Wealth, power, and control...

We wouldn't have industry, and modern conveniences without energy. Fossil-fuels will still be one of our best sources of energy for a very long time. It's pre-stored energy, and can sit in the ground a very long time, until needed. We really don't have the battery technology to replace fossil-fuels, as a portable energy source. Batteries will always need care and maintenance, if we hope to keep them in service very long. Most chemistry don't like extreme heat, or cold either. Most people won't see half the service life promised, since it's not an ideal world, like in the laboratory conditions.

CO2 is a life-essential molecule. Plants need it to thrive. Everything else need plants for food. Life is carbon-based, but plants are the only food source, that can take in carbon from the environment, CO2. The world population continues to grow, not just humans either... Which means the need for more base food, plants. Reducing CO2, will lead to less food available. Starving people are easier to control, or they kill each other off, fighting over food. Creating even a stronger dependence of the cult-government to protect and feed the devoted followers.

Solar and Wind, are the worst alternative energy sources. Both have a limited service life, 15-20 years, in ideal conditions. The 'farms' might go 25-30 years, if they can keep up with failures, and replace/repair. Which is fine, since they only have to work long enough to shutdown fossil-fuels long enough to destroy the most of the machines that use them. At which point, the cult-government can control that too.

sealover wrote:
Welcome to the next new member who joins climate-debate.com!

When I first posted in March, 2022, there were 1582 members.

As of today, October 16, 2023, there are1682 members.

The next one will be the 100th member to join since I joined the discussion.

Yet, it appears that fewer than 5 members post anything in any given week.

The summer of 2023 provided plenty of material for discussion for a website dedicated to communication about climate change.

However, that isn't what interests the handful of members who post here.

Indeed, the very same handful who were already posting when there were 1582 members. Half of them have been posting for more than eight years.

What about the 99 new members who joined after I started posting.

So far, ALL of them gave up on the website.

So, welcome to the next member, who will bring the total to 1683.

There is a small chance that someone with actual education and training in science will decide to join.

I haven't given up hope that someone with genuine interest in how applied biogeochemistry can be used to minimize greenhouse gas emissions, maximize sequestration of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and restore alkalinity to the ocean, will be curious enough to want to discuss these things with a PhD.

Under "sealover" one can find the threads I started. Hopefully, the titles are self explanatory, and the introductory page makes the subject matter clear.

Im a BM wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
You are correct, climate change is a man made crisis. Fortunately, it's a market hype and hysteria crisis, and the planet is just doing what it has always done. Extreme weather has always plagued mankind, and well documented. As in the past, there are some who will seek to profit off the misery of others. Instead of designing ways to mitigate future extreme weather events, so the damage isn't as devastating. The doomsday-seekers use computer models, to create hysteria and panic, when the weather isn't so extreme. Not much of a prophet, since there is likely to be weather events, of cataclysmic proportions eventually. But, the cult claims that if enough people join, and enough money spent, they can prevent further deadly weather events. Of course, there are never enough 'believers', or enough money. The same theme, as any cult. Wealth, power, and control...

We wouldn't have industry, and modern conveniences without energy. Fossil-fuels will still be one of our best sources of energy for a very long time. It's pre-stored energy, and can sit in the ground a very long time, until needed. We really don't have the battery technology to replace fossil-fuels, as a portable energy source. Batteries will always need care and maintenance, if we hope to keep them in service very long. Most chemistry don't like extreme heat, or cold either. Most people won't see half the service life promised, since it's not an ideal world, like in the laboratory conditions.

CO2 is a life-essential molecule. Plants need it to thrive. Everything else need plants for food. Life is carbon-based, but plants are the only food source, that can take in carbon from the environment, CO2. The world population continues to grow, not just humans either... Which means the need for more base food, plants. Reducing CO2, will lead to less food available. Starving people are easier to control, or they kill each other off, fighting over food. Creating even a stronger dependence of the cult-government to protect and feed the devoted followers.

Solar and Wind, are the worst alternative energy sources. Both have a limited service life, 15-20 years, in ideal conditions. The 'farms' might go 25-30 years, if they can keep up with failures, and replace/repair. Which is fine, since they only have to work long enough to shutdown fossil-fuels long enough to destroy the most of the machines that use them. At which point, the cult-government can control that too.

In just a few weeks, it will have been five full years since Harvey first posted on this website.

When IBdaMann decided to post the home address (along with a map) of another member's home, along with phone number, e mail address, and names of his sons and mother and former colleagues, Harvey thought that it was appropriate to repost it.

99 new members joined and then gave up on the website after I did.

But Harvey actually LIKES the insult fest here, because liberal democrats SUCK.

HarveyH55 wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
You are correct, climate change is a man made crisis. Fortunately, it's a market hype and hysteria crisis, and the planet is just doing what it has always done. Extreme weather has always plagued mankind, and well documented. As in the past, there are some who will seek to profit off the misery of others. Instead of designing ways to mitigate future extreme weather events, so the damage isn't as devastating. The doomsday-seekers use computer models, to create hysteria and panic, when the weather isn't so extreme. Not much of a prophet, since there is likely to be weather events, of cataclysmic proportions eventually. But, the cult claims that if enough people join, and enough money spent, they can prevent further deadly weather events. Of course, there are never enough 'believers', or enough money. The same theme, as any cult. Wealth, power, and control...

We wouldn't have industry, and modern conveniences without energy. Fossil-fuels will still be one of our best sources of energy for a very long time. It's pre-stored energy, and can sit in the ground a very long time, until needed. We really don't have the battery technology to replace fossil-fuels, as a portable energy source. Batteries will always need care and maintenance, if we hope to keep them in service very long. Most chemistry don't like extreme heat, or cold either. Most people won't see half the service life promised, since it's not an ideal world, like in the laboratory conditions.

CO2 is a life-essential molecule. Plants need it to thrive. Everything else need plants for food. Life is carbon-based, but plants are the only food source, that can take in carbon from the environment, CO2. The world population continues to grow, not just humans either... Which means the need for more base food, plants. Reducing CO2, will lead to less food available. Starving people are easier to control, or they kill each other off, fighting over food. Creating even a stronger dependence of the cult-government to protect and feed the devoted followers.

Solar and Wind, are the worst alternative energy sources. Both have a limited service life, 15-20 years, in ideal conditions. The 'farms' might go 25-30 years, if they can keep up with failures, and replace/repair. Which is fine, since they only have to work long enough to shutdown fossil-fuels long enough to destroy the most of the machines that use them. At which point, the cult-government can control that too.

In just a few weeks, it will have been five full years since Harvey first posted on this website.

When IBdaMann decided to post the home address (along with a map) of another member's home, along with phone number, e mail address, and names of his sons and mother and former colleagues, Harvey thought that it was appropriate to repost it.

99 new members joined and then gave up on the website after I did.

But Harvey actually LIKES the insult fest here, because liberal democrats SUCK.

Don't remember the post, or reposting it. Not really something I'd get involved in. Are you sure I didn't just reply, and it was quoted, along with most of a thread.... Annoying thing about this forum. Should only quote the post, not the entire history.

I use my actual name, nothing to hide. I'm sure that reasons to not use your name. This site is almost as embarrassing as porn. I do try to start threads, that are related to climate-change, but the tomato farmer derails them with his personal problems.

sealover wrote:
Welcome to the next new member who joins climate-debate.com!

When I first posted in March, 2022, there were 1582 members.

As of today, October 16, 2023, there are1682 members.

The next one will be the 100th member to join since I joined the discussion.

Yet, it appears that fewer than 5 members post anything in any given week.

The summer of 2023 provided plenty of material for discussion for a website dedicated to communication about climate change.

However, that isn't what interests the handful of members who post here.

Indeed, the very same handful who were already posting when there were 1582 members. Half of them have been posting for more than eight years.

What about the 99 new members who joined after I started posting.

So far, ALL of them gave up on the website.

So, welcome to the next member, who will bring the total to 1683.

There is a small chance that someone with actual education and training in science will decide to join.

I haven't given up hope that someone with genuine interest in how applied biogeochemistry can be used to minimize greenhouse gas emissions, maximize sequestration of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and restore alkalinity to the ocean, will be curious enough to want to discuss these things with a PhD.

Under "sealover" one can find the threads I started. Hopefully, the titles are self explanatory, and the introductory page makes the subject matter clear.

Im a BM wrote:

sealover wrote:
Welcome to the next new member who joins climate-debate.com!

When I first posted in March, 2022, there were 1582 members.

As of today, October 16, 2023, there are1682 members.

The next one will be the 100th member to join since I joined the discussion.

Yet, it appears that fewer than 5 members post anything in any given week.

The summer of 2023 provided plenty of material for discussion for a website dedicated to communication about climate change.

However, that isn't what interests the handful of members who post here.

Indeed, the very same handful who were already posting when there were 1582 members. Half of them have been posting for more than eight years.

What about the 99 new members who joined after I started posting.

So far, ALL of them gave up on the website.

So, welcome to the next member, who will bring the total to 1683.

There is a small chance that someone with actual education and training in science will decide to join.

I haven't given up hope that someone with genuine interest in how applied biogeochemistry can be used to minimize greenhouse gas emissions, maximize sequestration of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and restore alkalinity to the ocean, will be curious enough to want to discuss these things with a PhD.

Under "sealover" one can find the threads I started. Hopefully, the titles are self explanatory, and the introductory page makes the subject matter clear.

The website is now up to 1686 members.

Antotoro was the 100th new member to join after my first post.

It could have been a valuable discussion about greenhouse gas emissions associated with factory farms and related issues.

I can hardly blame Antotoro for giving up after the mockery from the trolls.

I doubt that Angrymessiah or whoever is joining now have much interest in discussing greenhouse gases or anything related.

Im a BM and his Sock wrote:
Welcome to the next new member who joins climate-debate.com!

When I first posted in March, 2022, there were 1582 members.

As of today, October 16, 2023, there are1682 members.

The next one will be the 100th member to join since I joined the discussion.

Yet, it appears that fewer than 5 members post anything in any given week.

The summer of 2023 provided plenty of material for discussion for a website dedicated to communication about climate change.

Im a BM and his Sock wrote:
However, that isn't what interests the handful of members who post here.

Indeed, the very same handful who were already posting when there were 1582 members. Half of them have been posting for more than eight years.

What about the 99 new members who joined after I started posting.

So far, ALL of them gave up on the website.

So, welcome to the next member, who will bring the total to 1683.

There is a small chance that someone with actual education and training in science will decide to join.

Im a BM and his Sock wrote:
I haven't given up hope that someone with genuine interest in how applied biogeochemistry

Im a BM and his Sock wrote:
can be used to minimize greenhouse gas emissions,

Im a BM and his Sock wrote:
maximize sequestration of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere,

Im a BM and his Sock wrote:
and restore alkalinity to the ocean,

Im a BM and his Sock wrote:
will be curious enough to want to discuss these things with a PhD.

Im a BM and his Sock wrote:
Under "sealover" one can find the threads I started. Hopefully, the titles are self explanatory, and the introductory page makes the subject matter clear.

Im a BM and his Sock wrote:
The website is now up to 1686 members.

Antotoro was the 100th new member to join after my first post.

It could have been a valuable discussion about greenhouse gas emissions associated with factory farms and related issues.

Im a BM and his Sock wrote:
I can hardly blame Antotoro for giving up after the mockery from the trolls.

Im a BM and his Sock wrote:
I doubt that Angrymessiah or whoever is joining now have much interest in discussing greenhouse gases or anything related.

Into the Night wrote:

Im a BM and his Sock wrote:
Welcome to the next new member who joins climate-debate.com!

When I first posted in March, 2022, there were 1582 members.

As of today, October 16, 2023, there are1682 members.

The next one will be the 100th member to join since I joined the discussion.

Yet, it appears that fewer than 5 members post anything in any given week.

The summer of 2023 provided plenty of material for discussion for a website dedicated to communication about climate change.

Climate cannot change.

Im a BM and his Sock wrote:
However, that isn't what interests the handful of members who post here.

Indeed, the very same handful who were already posting when there were 1582 members. Half of them have been posting for more than eight years.

What about the 99 new members who joined after I started posting.

So far, ALL of them gave up on the website.

So, welcome to the next member, who will bring the total to 1683.

There is a small chance that someone with actual education and training in science will decide to join.

Science isn't 'training' or 'education'.

Im a BM and his Sock wrote:
I haven't given up hope that someone with genuine interest in how applied biogeochemistry

You deny all chemistry. Your numerous buzzwords isn't chemistry.

Im a BM and his Sock wrote:
can be used to minimize greenhouse gas emissions,

There is no such thing as a 'greenhouse gas' except as a religious artifact.

Im a BM and his Sock wrote:
maximize sequestration of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere,

Carbon dioxide is not capable of 'changing the climate' or warming the Earth. You cannot create energy out of nothing. You are STILL denying the 1st law of thermodynamics.

Im a BM and his Sock wrote:
and restore alkalinity to the ocean,

The oceans are already alkaline.

Im a BM and his Sock wrote:
will be curious enough to want to discuss these things with a PhD.

Science is not a degree, certification, license, or any other sanctification. Your 'PhD' is fake.

Im a BM and his Sock wrote:
Under "sealover" one can find the threads I started. Hopefully, the titles are self explanatory, and the introductory page makes the subject matter clear.

Notice that no one has been posting in them.

Im a BM and his Sock wrote:
The website is now up to 1686 members.

Antotoro was the 100th new member to join after my first post.

It could have been a valuable discussion about greenhouse gas emissions associated with factory farms and related issues.

There is no such thing as a 'greenhouse gas' except as a religious artifact. No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth.

Im a BM and his Sock wrote:
I can hardly blame Antotoro for giving up after the mockery from the trolls.

Inversion fallacy. Indeed, you are trolling right now.

Im a BM and his Sock wrote:
I doubt that Angrymessiah or whoever is joining now have much interest in discussing greenhouse gases or anything related.

No, he won't. His only purpose here is to scam for money. He keeps creating new accounts after Branner removes them.