Well Space X aced another controlled landing. Will be using really low IQ astronuts

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:So anyone want to argue about the dumbest landing technique in the history of aviation?

I want to argue it.

I claim that the Air Force F-16 pilot who pioneered the habit ... er, ummm, the "technique" of landing upon emerging from a full loop ... until he had to eject because he initiated the loop at too low of an altitude.

He flew a desk from that point thereafter.

.

You were never in the navy.

Nah would the pilots of the space x firecracker be desk jockeys after getting toasted?

LOL hardly

It wasn't piloted. It was all remotely controlled by a computer. Funny story. When I was in the Navy, they used computers to control the landings of aircraft.
Then the airplane could match the pitch and yaw of the carrier more precisely.
You've probably never watched carrier landings but the planes would be rocking from side to side. They were matching the ships roll.

Swan wrote:

Dude it blew up, total failure. You wanna fly in that piece of shit?

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:So anyone want to argue about the dumbest landing technique in the history of aviation?

I want to argue it.

I claim that the Air Force F-16 pilot who pioneered the habit ... er, ummm, the "technique" of landing upon emerging from a full loop ... until he had to eject because he initiated the loop at too low of an altitude.

He flew a desk from that point thereafter.

.

Nah would the pilots of the space x firecracker be desk jockeys after getting toasted?

LOL hardly

It wasn't piloted. It was all remotely controlled by a computer. Funny story. When I was in the Navy, they used computers to control the landings of aircraft.
Then the airplane could match the pitch and yaw of the carrier more precisely.
You've probably never watched carrier landings but the planes would be rocking from side to side. They were matching the ships roll.

Dude it blew up, total failure. You wanna fly in that piece of shit?

You tell good stories.

Lay off the acid

And you're a nobody. What's your point? It's a prototype. They anticipate losing their work in this way. It's not unexpected. This helps them to understand what they need to improve upon. That's the cost of research and development.
You're just buying into the headlines while ignoring the real story. Is this within Space X's budget for R & D? If it is, not a problem.

LOL the starship is just a disguised Apollo style rocket designed to blow up on landing. Perhaps that ocean splashdown actually made sense.

Now you wanna tell us how you landed jets on carriers with your playstation or xbox

I don't play video games unless it's exercises in mathematics. My Sudoku goes from Geometry up to Calculus. I find that more enjoyable. With what you're interested in, it goes back to World War II and the Battle of Leyte Gulf in the Philippines.
It is considered to be the greatest naval battle ever fought. I read that book as well. And I visited the Philippines 3 times and served in the US Navy. I hope you notice these coincidences.
Of course with that battle, the US Navy defeated the Japanese Imperial Navy. That battle essentially ended the Japanese Navy's ability to fight for the rest of that war.
Are you interested in how the US Navy defeated a superior Japanese force? That is a yes or no question. And what allowed the US Navy to win that battle in WW II is what helped aircraft to land on carriers.
And a PlayStation or other electronic device would be too complicated. Something much simpler was used to defeat the Japanese that day. Care to know? You will look stupid when you know the answer. And you will want me to prove that because I served in the Navy.

p.s., while in the US Navy, an officer instructed me never to make a fool of someone because I knew I could. He didn't want me to make an officer look bad.
You're not an officer so I'm game if you are.

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:


LOL so you used electronics to control the landing of carrier jets in WW2.

Jesus you are a totally confused buffoon

In another line, this is my father in law on Leyte in 1945


https://imgur.com/a/PJ80m0X

Next

Not to disparage him but Leyte Gulf is on the other side of the island. I post about the Battle of Leyte Gulf and you post a picture of "in Leyte" away from the gulf.
The Battle of Leyte Gulf was in October 1944. And we're back to you playing the fool.


p.s., Hedy Lamar helped to invent cell phone technology during the same time period. https://www.hedylamarr.com/
Please don't tell me that you don't know about her contributions during WW II which are still significant today. I like my smartphone and she allows for it to be more difficult to hack.
And Swan, she was famous as an actress in Hollywood. Just was one of the biggest names there was. Please tell me you know this.

LOL how much quantum entangled cryptography was used in WW2.

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:



So you controlled a landing plane in WW2 with a gyroscope on the ship.

Seriously you need meds

You are a serious loser Swan. The US winning WW II was a joke from what you posted. And I guess you are right, it is a joke.

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:



So you controlled a landing plane in WW2 with a gyroscope on the ship.

Seriously you need meds

You are a serious loser Swan. The US winning WW II was a joke from what you posted. And I guess you are right, it is a joke.

WW2 is over, now American fighter jets are made in Japan.

Go figure

PS. My father and father in law were both there dude.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:


LOL so you used electronics to control the landing of carrier jets in WW2.

Jesus you are a totally confused buffoon

In another line, this is my father in law on Leyte in 1945


https://imgur.com/a/PJ80m0X

Next

Not to disparage him but Leyte Gulf is on the other side of the island. I post about the Battle of Leyte Gulf and you post a picture of "in Leyte" away from the gulf.
The Battle of Leyte Gulf was in October 1944. And we're back to you playing the fool.


p.s., Hedy Lamar helped to invent cell phone technology during the same time period. https://www.hedylamarr.com/
Please don't tell me that you don't know about her contributions during WW II which are still significant today. I like my smartphone and she allows for it to be more difficult to hack.
And Swan, she was famous as an actress in Hollywood. Just was one of the biggest names there was. Please tell me you know this.

LOL how much quantum entangled cryptography was used in WW2.

None.
Quantum entanglement is not cryptography.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:



So you controlled a landing plane in WW2 with a gyroscope on the ship.

Seriously you need meds

You are a serious loser Swan. The US winning WW II was a joke from what you posted. And I guess you are right, it is a joke.

WW2 is over, now American fighter jets are made in Japan.

Go figure

PS. My father and father in law were both there dude.

No, only some parts of American fighter jets are made in Japan. These parts are imported by TRW and sold as if they were made in America. Most parts for American fighter jets are made right here, in the States. Some parts are made in Canada, others are made in Mexico.

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:So anyone want to argue about the dumbest landing technique in the history of aviation?

I want to argue it.

I claim that the Air Force F-16 pilot who pioneered the habit ... er, ummm, the "technique" of landing upon emerging from a full loop ... until he had to eject because he initiated the loop at too low of an altitude.

He flew a desk from that point thereafter.

.

Nah would the pilots of the space x firecracker be desk jockeys after getting toasted?

LOL hardly

It wasn't piloted. It was all remotely controlled by a computer. Funny story. When I was in the Navy, they used computers to control the landings of aircraft.
Then the airplane could match the pitch and yaw of the carrier more precisely.
You've probably never watched carrier landings but the planes would be rocking from side to side. They were matching the ships roll.

Dude it blew up, total failure. You wanna fly in that piece of shit?

You tell good stories.

Lay off the acid

And you're a nobody. What's your point? It's a prototype. They anticipate losing their work in this way. It's not unexpected. This helps them to understand what they need to improve upon. That's the cost of research and development.
You're just buying into the headlines while ignoring the real story. Is this within Space X's budget for R & D? If it is, not a problem.

LOL the starship is just a disguised Apollo style rocket designed to blow up on landing. Perhaps that ocean splashdown actually made sense.

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:



So you controlled a landing plane in WW2 with a gyroscope on the ship.

Seriously you need meds

You are a serious loser Swan. The US winning WW II was a joke from what you posted. And I guess you are right, it is a joke.

WW2 is over, now American fighter jets are made in Japan.

Go figure

PS. My father and father in law were both there dude.

Your attitude is a joke. Suggests that you might be on drugs. After all, you are the person ridiculing technology that helped the US and its allies to win. And why technology helping the US and its allies to win is because you don't care for who won the war. It is pretty much that simple.
An FYI, my father's country was occupied by the 3rd Reich. Kind of why I don't make fun of the US helping to win that war. Yet for you, it is a joke. An FYI, I'm not an American even though I have an American mother and am from Ohio.
Why is this? Because you are an American.

Look kid you still haven't explained how you landed jets on carriers remotely and matched the landing to the yaw of the ship.

Eagerly awaiting that

Maybe you're too old to understand? I mean Thank You for settling the West Gramps. That was before 1880, right? Since then we've invented things like the telegraph and the wireless radio.
Have you ever heard of Marconi or Tesla? They invented wireless transmission of electrical signals. Were you in stasis or something? Stasis is where your body is freeze dried like coffee. Then just add hot water and you have coffee again.
Is that what happened to you?

LOL you buy any good telegraph stocks today? The difference between you and I is that you are interested in the past and I am interested in the quantum entangled future. Just added more Google A shares in fact.

Now you explain the first tube transistor

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:



So you controlled a landing plane in WW2 with a gyroscope on the ship.

Seriously you need meds

You are a serious loser Swan. The US winning WW II was a joke from what you posted. And I guess you are right, it is a joke.

WW2 is over, now American fighter jets are made in Japan.

Go figure

PS. My father and father in law were both there dude.

Your attitude is a joke. Suggests that you might be on drugs. After all, you are the person ridiculing technology that helped the US and its allies to win. And why technology helping the US and its allies to win is because you don't care for who won the war. It is pretty much that simple.
An FYI, my father's country was occupied by the 3rd Reich. Kind of why I don't make fun of the US helping to win that war. Yet for you, it is a joke. An FYI, I'm not an American even though I have an American mother and am from Ohio.
Why is this? Because you are an American.

Look kid you still haven't explained how you landed jets on carriers remotely and matched the landing to the yaw of the ship.

Eagerly awaiting that

Maybe you're too old to understand? I mean Thank You for settling the West Gramps. That was before 1880, right? Since then we've invented things like the telegraph and the wireless radio.
Have you ever heard of Marconi or Tesla? They invented wireless transmission of electrical signals. Were you in stasis or something? Stasis is where your body is freeze dried like coffee. Then just add hot water and you have coffee again.
Is that what happened to you?

LOL you buy any good telegraph stocks today? The difference between you and I is that you are interested in the past and I am interested in the quantum entangled future. Just added more Google A shares in fact.

Now you explain the first tube transistor

Quantum entanglement is neither past nor future.

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:



So you controlled a landing plane in WW2 with a gyroscope on the ship.

Seriously you need meds

You are a serious loser Swan. The US winning WW II was a joke from what you posted. And I guess you are right, it is a joke.

WW2 is over, now American fighter jets are made in Japan.

Go figure

PS. My father and father in law were both there dude.

Your attitude is a joke. Suggests that you might be on drugs. After all, you are the person ridiculing technology that helped the US and its allies to win. And why technology helping the US and its allies to win is because you don't care for who won the war. It is pretty much that simple.
An FYI, my father's country was occupied by the 3rd Reich. Kind of why I don't make fun of the US helping to win that war. Yet for you, it is a joke. An FYI, I'm not an American even though I have an American mother and am from Ohio.
Why is this? Because you are an American.

Look kid you still haven't explained how you landed jets on carriers remotely and matched the landing to the yaw of the ship.

Eagerly awaiting that

Maybe you're too old to understand? I mean Thank You for settling the West Gramps. That was before 1880, right? Since then we've invented things like the telegraph and the wireless radio.
Have you ever heard of Marconi or Tesla? They invented wireless transmission of electrical signals. Were you in stasis or something? Stasis is where your body is freeze dried like coffee. Then just add hot water and you have coffee again.
Is that what happened to you?

Into the Night wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:



So you controlled a landing plane in WW2 with a gyroscope on the ship.

Seriously you need meds

You are a serious loser Swan. The US winning WW II was a joke from what you posted. And I guess you are right, it is a joke.

WW2 is over, now American fighter jets are made in Japan.

Go figure

PS. My father and father in law were both there dude.

Your attitude is a joke. Suggests that you might be on drugs. After all, you are the person ridiculing technology that helped the US and its allies to win. And why technology helping the US and its allies to win is because you don't care for who won the war. It is pretty much that simple.
An FYI, my father's country was occupied by the 3rd Reich. Kind of why I don't make fun of the US helping to win that war. Yet for you, it is a joke. An FYI, I'm not an American even though I have an American mother and am from Ohio.
Why is this? Because you are an American.

Look kid you still haven't explained how you landed jets on carriers remotely and matched the landing to the yaw of the ship.

Eagerly awaiting that

Maybe you're too old to understand? I mean Thank You for settling the West Gramps. That was before 1880, right? Since then we've invented things like the telegraph and the wireless radio.
Have you ever heard of Marconi or Tesla? They invented wireless transmission of electrical signals. Were you in stasis or something? Stasis is where your body is freeze dried like coffee. Then just add hot water and you have coffee again.
Is that what happened to you?

Marconi is generally credited with making wireless communications practical. His patent for wireless communications however was ruled invalid. The phenomenon was discovered earlier in England, but that demonstration only showed the phenomenon, not communications per se.

Tesla constructed and patented a radio controlled boat. While not communications it was telecommand (what we today call RC) through wireless means. This was patented in 1892. It was this patent that invalided Marconi's claim in 1943. All Marconi could claim was using such a device for communications purposes (telegraph).

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:



So you controlled a landing plane in WW2 with a gyroscope on the ship.

Seriously you need meds

You are a serious loser Swan. The US winning WW II was a joke from what you posted. And I guess you are right, it is a joke.

WW2 is over, now American fighter jets are made in Japan.

Go figure

PS. My father and father in law were both there dude.

Your attitude is a joke. Suggests that you might be on drugs. After all, you are the person ridiculing technology that helped the US and its allies to win. And why technology helping the US and its allies to win is because you don't care for who won the war. It is pretty much that simple.
An FYI, my father's country was occupied by the 3rd Reich. Kind of why I don't make fun of the US helping to win that war. Yet for you, it is a joke. An FYI, I'm not an American even though I have an American mother and am from Ohio.
Why is this? Because you are an American.

Look kid you still haven't explained how you landed jets on carriers remotely and matched the landing to the yaw of the ship.

Eagerly awaiting that

Maybe you're too old to understand? I mean Thank You for settling the West Gramps. That was before 1880, right? Since then we've invented things like the telegraph and the wireless radio.
Have you ever heard of Marconi or Tesla? They invented wireless transmission of electrical signals. Were you in stasis or something? Stasis is where your body is freeze dried like coffee. Then just add hot water and you have coffee again.
Is that what happened to you?

LOL you buy any good telegraph stocks today? The difference between you and I is that you are interested in the past and I am interested in the quantum entangled future. Just added more Google A shares in fact.

Now you explain the first tube transistor

Swan wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Swan wrote:I'm 55, not 80.

I KNEW it! He's not old enough to have seen the ice age!

Never been to the moon either but I know that there is less gravity.

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:

I'm 55, not 80. My father was born in 1917, he was 48 years old when I was born.

I never mentioned Tesla.

Is this a security clearance test?

I typically pass after embarrassing the Bureau

I'm beginning to agree with GasGuzzler. That doesn't happen often. You asked about the first tube transistor and then you avoid your own question. You don't know what one is, do you?
I'll give you the answer, it was Edison's light bulb. See how easy that was? An LED is a light emitting diode. A light bulb is simply a light emitting tube transistor.
And this is where we're back to YAWN.

GasGuzzler wrote:

Swan wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Swan wrote:I'm 55, not 80.

I KNEW it! He's not old enough to have seen the ice age!

Never been to the moon either but I know that there is less gravity.

Never been to Mexico but I know it's there.

Swan wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Swan wrote:

GasGuzzler wrote:

Swan wrote:I'm 55, not 80.

I KNEW it! He's not old enough to have seen the ice age!

Never been to the moon either but I know that there is less gravity.

Never been to Mexico but I know it's there.

Never been to Iran but I know it smells

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:

I'm 55, not 80. My father was born in 1917, he was 48 years old when I was born.

I never mentioned Tesla.

Is this a security clearance test?

I typically pass after embarrassing the Bureau

I'm beginning to agree with GasGuzzler. That doesn't happen often. You asked about the first tube transistor and then you avoid your own question. You don't know what one is, do you?
I'll give you the answer, it was Edison's light bulb. See how easy that was? An LED is a light emitting diode. A light bulb is simply a light emitting tube transistor.
And this is where we're back to YAWN.

LOL wrong again, see Edison's light bulb was just not used in the Atanasoff–Berry computer, which is considered the first known example of the modern gate system of computing. So go watch another youtoob video and claim your brilliance based upon that again.

Now back to the theoretical speed of quantum entangled communications. It is being speculated that quantum entanglement is anywhere from instant to 10,000 times light speed, which brings Einstein's relativity concept into question and has certain physicist debating the reality of the entire Universe.

Oh yea, I forgot you are still amazed by the first light bulb.

Sorry

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:


LOL so you used electronics to control the landing of carrier jets in WW2.

Jesus you are a totally confused buffoon

In another line, this is my father in law on Leyte in 1945


https://imgur.com/a/PJ80m0X

Next

Not to disparage him but Leyte Gulf is on the other side of the island. I post about the Battle of Leyte Gulf and you post a picture of "in Leyte" away from the gulf.
The Battle of Leyte Gulf was in October 1944. And we're back to you playing the fool.


p.s., Hedy Lamar helped to invent cell phone technology during the same time period. https://www.hedylamarr.com/
Please don't tell me that you don't know about her contributions during WW II which are still significant today. I like my smartphone and she allows for it to be more difficult to hack.
And Swan, she was famous as an actress in Hollywood. Just was one of the biggest names there was. Please tell me you know this.

LOL how much quantum entangled cryptography was used in WW2.

None.
Quantum entanglement is not cryptography.

Not yet, but I'm working on the concept. And since information has been transmitted using entangled particles all the information that is needed are zeroes and one's, then an operating system can be booted, ask a question and return the answer all in the same instant step as perceived by a human.

LOL and if I fail I already own Google stock

https://research.google/teams/applied-science/quantum/

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:



So you controlled a landing plane in WW2 with a gyroscope on the ship.

Seriously you need meds

You are a serious loser Swan. The US winning WW II was a joke from what you posted. And I guess you are right, it is a joke.

WW2 is over, now American fighter jets are made in Japan.

Go figure

PS. My father and father in law were both there dude.

No, only some parts of American fighter jets are made in Japan. These parts are imported by TRW and sold as if they were made in America. Most parts for American fighter jets are made right here, in the States. Some parts are made in Canada, others are made in Mexico.

Wrong the F35 is made in Nagoya Japan.

Yawn

Japan to Continue Assembling F-35A Fighter Jets at Home
Japan intends to continue to assemble F-35As at a local facility in Nagoya.

The Japanese government is reversing plans to shut down a Mitsubishi Heavy Industries' F-35 Final Assembly and Check Out (FACO) facility in Nagoya, Japan, according to local media reports.

The government has been reviewing options to close the FACO facility by 2022 and instead directly import fifth-generation Lightning II F-35A stealth fighter jets in fly-away condition from the United States as a cost saving measure.

Japan is now looking to reverse its decision to import F-35s after Mitsubishi Heavy Industries overhauled its assembly process to reduce costs.

"Finishing one F-35 in Japan is now expected to cost 9.37 billion yen ($86.3 million), compared with 9.42 billion yen to ship the plane from the U.S., according to Japan's Defense Ministry," the Nikkei Asian Review reported in mid-December. "The cabinet is expected to approve the domestic production plan soon."


Japan
The security alliance between Japan and the United States has been a cornerstone of peace and prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region for generations. Playing a part in that alliance and working in partnership with local businesses, Lockheed Martin delivers cutting-edge technologies and innovations to support the future prosperity of Japan and its communities. Working with our Japanese partners, we are committed to partnering with industry to shape best-value solutions that deliver low-risk, proven capability with high levels of local content, technology transfer and workshare. Examples include:

F-35: With the Final Assembly and Checkout Facility (FACO) in Nagoya now complete, Japan's F-35 aircraft are being assembled and delivered in Japan.
Helicopters: Commercial and military helicopters are provided by Sikorsky, a Lockheed Martin company, and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (三菱重工) in partnership for the last 65 years. More than 550 military helicopters have been produced for the Japan Self-Defense Forces under manufacturing license agreements with Sikorsky.
Combat Systems: The Aegis Combat System has provided advanced sea, air and undersea threat detection capabilities to Japan's Kongo- and Atago-class ships for the last 25 years – with more opportunities to come in the future.
Try again

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:



So you controlled a landing plane in WW2 with a gyroscope on the ship.

Seriously you need meds

You are a serious loser Swan. The US winning WW II was a joke from what you posted. And I guess you are right, it is a joke.

WW2 is over, now American fighter jets are made in Japan.

Go figure

PS. My father and father in law were both there dude.

Your attitude is a joke. Suggests that you might be on drugs. After all, you are the person ridiculing technology that helped the US and its allies to win. And why technology helping the US and its allies to win is because you don't care for who won the war. It is pretty much that simple.
An FYI, my father's country was occupied by the 3rd Reich. Kind of why I don't make fun of the US helping to win that war. Yet for you, it is a joke. An FYI, I'm not an American even though I have an American mother and am from Ohio.
Why is this? Because you are an American.

Look kid you still haven't explained how you landed jets on carriers remotely and matched the landing to the yaw of the ship.

Eagerly awaiting that

Maybe you're too old to understand? I mean Thank You for settling the West Gramps. That was before 1880, right? Since then we've invented things like the telegraph and the wireless radio.
Have you ever heard of Marconi or Tesla? They invented wireless transmission of electrical signals. Were you in stasis or something? Stasis is where your body is freeze dried like coffee. Then just add hot water and you have coffee again.
Is that what happened to you?

LOL you buy any good telegraph stocks today? The difference between you and I is that you are interested in the past and I am interested in the quantum entangled future. Just added more Google A shares in fact.

Now you explain the first tube transistor

Quantum entanglement is neither past nor future.

Actually creating entangled communications networks is the present and future.

But you stay there in denial

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:



So you controlled a landing plane in WW2 with a gyroscope on the ship.

Seriously you need meds

You are a serious loser Swan. The US winning WW II was a joke from what you posted. And I guess you are right, it is a joke.

WW2 is over, now American fighter jets are made in Japan.

Go figure

PS. My father and father in law were both there dude.

Your attitude is a joke. Suggests that you might be on drugs. After all, you are the person ridiculing technology that helped the US and its allies to win. And why technology helping the US and its allies to win is because you don't care for who won the war. It is pretty much that simple.
An FYI, my father's country was occupied by the 3rd Reich. Kind of why I don't make fun of the US helping to win that war. Yet for you, it is a joke. An FYI, I'm not an American even though I have an American mother and am from Ohio.
Why is this? Because you are an American.

Look kid you still haven't explained how you landed jets on carriers remotely and matched the landing to the yaw of the ship.

Eagerly awaiting that

Maybe you're too old to understand? I mean Thank You for settling the West Gramps. That was before 1880, right? Since then we've invented things like the telegraph and the wireless radio.
Have you ever heard of Marconi or Tesla? They invented wireless transmission of electrical signals. Were you in stasis or something? Stasis is where your body is freeze dried like coffee. Then just add hot water and you have coffee again.
Is that what happened to you?

Marconi is generally credited with making wireless communications practical. His patent for wireless communications however was ruled invalid. The phenomenon was discovered earlier in England, but that demonstration only showed the phenomenon, not communications per se.

Tesla constructed and patented a radio controlled boat. While not communications it was telecommand (what we today call RC) through wireless means. This was patented in 1892. It was this patent that invalided Marconi's claim in 1943. All Marconi could claim was using such a device for communications purposes (telegraph).

Which has nothing to do with quantum entanglement in any way.

You are stuck in the dead past

Sad

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:



So you controlled a landing plane in WW2 with a gyroscope on the ship.

Seriously you need meds

You are a serious loser Swan. The US winning WW II was a joke from what you posted. And I guess you are right, it is a joke.

WW2 is over, now American fighter jets are made in Japan.

Go figure

PS. My father and father in law were both there dude.

Your attitude is a joke. Suggests that you might be on drugs. After all, you are the person ridiculing technology that helped the US and its allies to win. And why technology helping the US and its allies to win is because you don't care for who won the war. It is pretty much that simple.
An FYI, my father's country was occupied by the 3rd Reich. Kind of why I don't make fun of the US helping to win that war. Yet for you, it is a joke. An FYI, I'm not an American even though I have an American mother and am from Ohio.
Why is this? Because you are an American.

Look kid you still haven't explained how you landed jets on carriers remotely and matched the landing to the yaw of the ship.

Eagerly awaiting that

Maybe you're too old to understand? I mean Thank You for settling the West Gramps. That was before 1880, right? Since then we've invented things like the telegraph and the wireless radio.
Have you ever heard of Marconi or Tesla? They invented wireless transmission of electrical signals. Were you in stasis or something? Stasis is where your body is freeze dried like coffee. Then just add hot water and you have coffee again.
Is that what happened to you?

LOL you buy any good telegraph stocks today? The difference between you and I is that you are interested in the past and I am interested in the quantum entangled future. Just added more Google A shares in fact.

Now you explain the first tube transistor

Quantum entanglement is neither past nor future.

Actually creating entangled communications networks is the present and future.

But you stay there in denial

You've been living in science fiction too long. Quantum entanglement communications is not possible today.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James___ wrote:

Swan wrote:



So you controlled a landing plane in WW2 with a gyroscope on the ship.

Seriously you need meds

You are a serious loser Swan. The US winning WW II was a joke from what you posted. And I guess you are right, it is a joke.

WW2 is over, now American fighter jets are made in Japan.

Go figure

PS. My father and father in law were both there dude.

Your attitude is a joke. Suggests that you might be on drugs. After all, you are the person ridiculing technology that helped the US and its allies to win. And why technology helping the US and its allies to win is because you don't care for who won the war. It is pretty much that simple.
An FYI, my father's country was occupied by the 3rd Reich. Kind of why I don't make fun of the US helping to win that war. Yet for you, it is a joke. An FYI, I'm not an American even though I have an American mother and am from Ohio.
Why is this? Because you are an American.

Look kid you still haven't explained how you landed jets on carriers remotely and matched the landing to the yaw of the ship.

Eagerly awaiting that

Maybe you're too old to understand? I mean Thank You for settling the West Gramps. That was before 1880, right? Since then we've invented things like the telegraph and the wireless radio.
Have you ever heard of Marconi or Tesla? They invented wireless transmission of electrical signals. Were you in stasis or something? Stasis is where your body is freeze dried like coffee. Then just add hot water and you have coffee again.
Is that what happened to you?

Marconi is generally credited with making wireless communications practical. His patent for wireless communications however was ruled invalid. The phenomenon was discovered earlier in England, but that demonstration only showed the phenomenon, not communications per se.

Tesla constructed and patented a radio controlled boat. While not communications it was telecommand (what we today call RC) through wireless means. This was patented in 1892. It was this patent that invalided Marconi's claim in 1943. All Marconi could claim was using such a device for communications purposes (telegraph).

Which has nothing to do with quantum entanglement in any way.

You are stuck in the dead past

Sad

Not at all. I use modern telegraphy just like everyone else, indeed, in ways that most people don't use at all.

There is nothing past or future about quantum entanglement.

Swan wrote:
So there will never be an unhackable quantum internet.

Yawn..................!

U.S. Government Says It's Building A 'Virtually Unhackable' Quantum Internet

Swan wrote:
The internet, that global interconnection of networks, routers and protocols flinging data around the planet, has touched almost every aspect of our lives. It is, arguably, the greatest invention of the 20th century. Unfortunately, it's also a flawed one. The existence of a $173 billion (£135 billion) cybersecurity industry highlights the scale of the data protection and privacy issues that consumers, business and governments face when using the internet.

Swan wrote:
But what if there was a 21st-century alternative that promised to secure the movement of data more completely than ever before?

Swan wrote:
What if there was a quantum internet that came with a promise of being virtually unhackable?

Swan wrote:
That's precisely what the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has said is to be built to usher in "a new era of communications" and push the U.S. to the "forefront of the global quantum race."

Swan wrote:
What's more, the DOE announced during a July 23 press conference, a working prototype is expected to be completed within the next ten years. I'll return to the unhackable claim shortly, but first, let's examine just what this quantum internet blueprint involves.

Swan wrote:
Keep up or get out

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
So there will never be an unhackable quantum internet.

Yawn..................!

U.S. Government Says It's Building A 'Virtually Unhackable' Quantum Internet

There is no U.S. Government anymore. Governments say a lot of stupid things, like a tomato is a vegetable (it isn't), there are 72 genders (there are only two), that war is peace, and that black is white.

Governments don't build anything.

Swan wrote:
The internet, that global interconnection of networks, routers and protocols flinging data around the planet, has touched almost every aspect of our lives. It is, arguably, the greatest invention of the 20th century. Unfortunately, it's also a flawed one. The existence of a $173 billion (£135 billion) cybersecurity industry highlights the scale of the data protection and privacy issues that consumers, business and governments face when using the internet.

The public-private key encryption system combined with a multi-time pad is unbreakable, even mathematically. Spy agencies use one time pads for encoding their messages, and depend on secure transfer of key information before the spy leaves on a mission. For field updates, it's back to the currently used method of public-private key combined with a multi-time pad.

Swan wrote:
But what if there was a 21st-century alternative that promised to secure the movement of data more completely than ever before?

Movement of data IS secure.

Swan wrote:
What if there was a quantum internet that came with a promise of being virtually unhackable?

Movement of data using public-private key and multi-time pad IS unhackable.

Swan wrote:
That's precisely what the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has said is to be built to usher in "a new era of communications" and push the U.S. to the "forefront of the global quantum race."

Buzzword fallacies. What 'race'?

Swan wrote:
What's more, the DOE announced during a July 23 press conference, a working prototype is expected to be completed within the next ten years. I'll return to the unhackable claim shortly, but first, let's examine just what this quantum internet blueprint involves.

What blueprint? You do realize, don't you, that blueprint machines are incredibly old fashioned? No one uses that smelly process anymore (it emits ammonia).

Swan wrote:
Keep up or get out

Magick is not 'keeping up'. Your use of old fashioned ideas like blueprints as the future means you have no idea what you are talking about, and neither does any government on this subject.

Into the Night wrote:No, only some parts of American fighter jets are made in Japan. These parts are imported by TRW and sold as if they were made in America.

Into the Night wrote:Most parts for American fighter jets are made right here, in the States. Some parts are made in Canada, others are made in Mexico.

IBdaMann wrote:

Into the Night wrote:No, only some parts of American fighter jets are made in Japan. These parts are imported by TRW and sold as if they were made in America.

"Assembled in America."

Into the Night wrote:Most parts for American fighter jets are made right here, in the States. Some parts are made in Canada, others are made in Mexico.

The main issue with fighter jets is ... getting titanium.

Oh joy! ... the top exporters of titanium are China, Russia, Japan, Kazakhstan, Ukraine and India.

.

Into the Night wrote:Enjoy. There is nothing inherently cryptographic about quantum entanglement. You are chasing magick, not cryptography.

IBdaMann wrote:

Into the Night wrote:Enjoy. There is nothing inherently cryptographic about quantum entanglement. You are chasing magick, not cryptography.

There is something to be said of the concept of rendering a message uninterceptible.

Cryptography prevents the message from being understood.
Steganography prevents the message from being discovered.
Quantum Entanglement could prevent the message from ever being acquired.

... presuming quantum entanglement pans out.

.

Swan wrote:Entanglement is very real and does not have to be created, it only needs to be understood

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Entanglement is very real and does not have to be created, it only needs to be understood

How do you know that it is real if you admittedly do not understand it?

Is this something we need to be adding to your padded cell?

.

Swan wrote:Actually the F35 is assembled in America, Italy and Japan

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Actually the F35 is assembled in America, Italy and Japan

Not the point. Read my post again (and note Into the Night's comment to which I was responding).

.

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Actually the F35 is assembled in America, Italy and Japan

Not the point. Read my post again (and note Into the Night's comment to which I was responding).

.

LOL you read your mistake again.

The F35 is made in Japan,

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Actually the F35 is assembled in America, Italy and Japan

Not the point. Read my post again (and note Into the Night's comment to which I was responding).

.

LOL you read your mistake again.

The F35 is made in Japan,

One of these days you'll stop babbling incoherently and they just might let you out.

.

HarveyH55 wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Actually the F35 is assembled in America, Italy and Japan

Not the point. Read my post again (and note Into the Night's comment to which I was responding).

.

LOL you read your mistake again.

The F35 is made in Japan,

One of these days you'll stop babbling incoherently and they just might let you out.

.

He babbles because of required meds. You don't want him to go off his meds, again...

Swan wrote:Yawn, how are your Apple orchards growing?

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Yawn, how are your Apple orchards growing?

LOL Yawn What I have is better than meager stock shares LOL

Yawn.

.