Remember me
▼ Content

"Trump won in a landslide" - A Falsifiable Hypothesis


"Trump won in a landslide" - A Falsifiable Hypothesis17-04-2022 20:16
sealover
★★★☆☆
(804)
"Trump won in a landslide" - A Falsifiable Hypothesis

This one requires no advanced degrees or use of buzzwords.

This falsifiable hypothesis has already been falsified.

Our court system has this little requirement for "evidence".

If they had any evidence, why are they keeping it secret?

You don't have to have a PhD to sit on the jury.

But the judge is there to ensure that trolls who hide behind word games aren't allowed to turn it into a clown show.

The clown show TRIED and TRIED in court.

But even TRUMP-APPOINTED JUDGES couldn't pretend that it made any sense.

"Trump won in a landslide" - A Falsifiable Hypothesis

(already thoroughly debunked)

But maybe there is some legitimate "debate"?

Or maybe we just need an unambiguous definition for "landslide" election win, under which LOSING by more than seven million votes doesn't contradict it.
17-04-2022 20:20
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(12612)
sealover wrote:
"Trump won in a landslide" - A Falsifiable Hypothesis
This falsifiable hypothesis has already been falsified.
Our court system has this little requirement for "evidence".

You're too late. tmiddles already tried this "the Judicial branch of government determines reality" line of reasoning.

Yes, yes, you were asked to "testify" in open court within the Judicial branch of government and you saved the planet.

No court establishes reality.

.
17-04-2022 20:54
HarveyH55Profile picture★★★★★
(4332)
I don't know about landslide victory. Trump is known to embellish a 'little', but often basically correct. Covid set the stage for some shenanigans, which the left is not know to pass up any opportunity. Masking everyone needs to wear a mask. Don't robbers traditional cover their faces? Limited occupancy and social-distancing, prevented close observation/monitoring what counters were doing. The change to mail-in ballets, waving the strict requirements do to the pandemic, during the election cycle. A registered voter, doesn't mean they'll bother prying their liberal ass off the couch to actually vote. Even with the mail-in ballot, no telling how many actually bothered to return theirs. Mail-in was new to many, those not filled out correctly, discarded, or 'verified' by phone, depending on who was voted for. Duplicate ballots, such as a person voted in person, and by mail. Which ever one worked best for the left, or both destroyed.

There are rules for evidence, and must be submitted properly. Not everything is clearly defined in our laws. You can do some really wrong things, and get away with it. Also, when you accuse someone, you need to site the specific laws broken, how they apply to your case, provide evidence that supports those charges. Judges don't help you build your case, they just make sure you follow the rules. Covid changed things a lot. It gave the left a lot of 'wiggle' room, and the exploited the opportunity. I think most of the fraud accrued, before the ballots even got turned in to be counted. Would matter how many times they got re-counted. Nor any evidence of fraud. The mail-in ballots could have been sent from China, for all it mattered.
RE: More than "two sides" in this debate17-04-2022 21:33
sealover
★★★☆☆
(804)
More than "two sides" in this debate

It's not just did Trump win AT ALL.

You've got the full blown conspiracy that required every local election board to be corrupt at the behest of a dead foreign dicatator.

You've got the "there were some shenanigans" doubters. Don't go FULL QANON, but are willing to dabble in the doubt.

Indeed, there could be plenty of "debate" between just those two "sides".

Both say Trump won somehow. Just with differing degrees of grandiosity, denial, and conspiracy mongering.

Like the climate "debate", way more than "two sides".

There is full blown denial (massive conspiracy of lies), and there are different degrees of "denial lite".

It's actually getting COOLER.

It's getting warmer, but its part of a completely natural cycle.

It's getting warmer, but human activity only contributes a little to the problem.

Some would pretend that there is genuine "debate" among scientists.

Others would say it is PURELY POLITICAL.

And others would even say that evildoers are intent on pushing a harmful hoax to advance a more sinister agenda.

So, how many chairs do we set at the climate change "debate"?

What about the Trump election debate?

Either he told the truth and he won in a "landslide".

Or he LIED and did NOT win in a "landslide".

LIARS make shitty presidents.

And America just got sick of "winning" all the time with Trump.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

HarveyH55 wrote:
I don't know about landslide victory. Trump is known to embellish a 'little', but often basically correct. Covid set the stage for some shenanigans, which the left is not know to pass up any opportunity. Masking everyone needs to wear a mask. Don't robbers traditional cover their faces? Limited occupancy and social-distancing, prevented close observation/monitoring what counters were doing. The change to mail-in ballets, waving the strict requirements do to the pandemic, during the election cycle. A registered voter, doesn't mean they'll bother prying their liberal ass off the couch to actually vote. Even with the mail-in ballot, no telling how many actually bothered to return theirs. Mail-in was new to many, those not filled out correctly, discarded, or 'verified' by phone, depending on who was voted for. Duplicate ballots, such as a person voted in person, and by mail. Which ever one worked best for the left, or both destroyed.

There are rules for evidence, and must be submitted properly. Not everything is clearly defined in our laws. You can do some really wrong things, and get away with it. Also, when you accuse someone, you need to site the specific laws broken, how they apply to your case, provide evidence that supports those charges. Judges don't help you build your case, they just make sure you follow the rules. Covid changed things a lot. It gave the left a lot of 'wiggle' room, and the exploited the opportunity. I think most of the fraud accrued, before the ballots even got turned in to be counted. Would matter how many times they got re-counted. Nor any evidence of fraud. The mail-in ballots could have been sent from China, for all it mattered.
17-04-2022 22:12
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(12612)
squeal over wrote:You've got the full blown conspiracy that required every local election board to be corrupt at the behest of a dead foreign dictator.

Nope. That one only came into existence just now ... from you.

squeal over wrote:You've got the "there were some shenanigans" doubters.

That's pretty much the long and short of it.

squeal over wrote:Indeed, there could be plenty of "debate" between just those two "sides".

Nope. There really isn't anyone debating it. The nation watched it unfurl on national television, hence nothing will ever be accomplished by trying to contrive some sort of debate.

Even with the vast numbers of Trump votes that were destroyed, Trump won by an historic record landslide margin. Those who did the "shredding" of Trump votes also had to fabricate a greater-than-record-breaking number of votes for Biden, which is why it took days for us to "realize" that Biden had just "eked by" making Biden's count so absolutely absurd, but those stealing the election from We the People didn't really care.

So Trump lost with an historic landslide vote count that was nonetheless artificially low, beaten by Joe Biden who couldn't manage to get double-digit attendance at his rallies yet somehow received beyond Trump's record-breaking landslide.

You're right, there is so much to debate there.

Yawn.
18-04-2022 00:47
HarveyH55Profile picture★★★★★
(4332)
It took over a week to count votes, and declare a winner?

Biden was one primary away from dropping out. Then the pandemic was declared. The more he hid in his basement, the more liberals started to like him. Really surprised Bernie dropped out early. He's always been in it, to win it, never gives up. At his age, it was likely his last chance at the White House. Mayor Pete had a lot of forward momentum. Figured he'd stay in for a while. Maybe covid and HIV don't play well together. Even if the 22 other democrat candidates dropped out for one reason, or another, Biden still was an enthusiastic only one left choice. He did do anything to gain support, only relying on party-approval.

Trump had no problem packing large venues with supporters. Even had large screen TVs set up outside for the overflow. People wanted to here him speak. Enough to stand out in the cold and rain, for 2+ hours. A Biden rally could fill half-court, of an elementary school basketball court. Lasting 20-30 of talking/reading.
18-04-2022 02:13
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(19383)
sealover wrote:
"Trump won in a landslide" - A Falsifiable Hypothesis

This one requires no advanced degrees or use of buzzwords.

This falsifiable hypothesis has already been falsified.

Our court system has this little requirement for "evidence".

If they had any evidence, why are they keeping it secret?

You don't have to have a PhD to sit on the jury.

But the judge is there to ensure that trolls who hide behind word games aren't allowed to turn it into a clown show.

The clown show TRIED and TRIED in court.

But even TRUMP-APPOINTED JUDGES couldn't pretend that it made any sense.

"Trump won in a landslide" - A Falsifiable Hypothesis

(already thoroughly debunked)

But maybe there is some legitimate "debate"?

Or maybe we just need an unambiguous definition for "landslide" election win, under which LOSING by more than seven million votes doesn't contradict it.

There was no election in 2020. The election faulted due to election fraud by Democrats.
There are not seven million members of the electoral college.

Neither a court not a judge is required for evidence to exist.

I have already described some of this evidence, including:

* laws changed without authorization and ex post facto.
* elections 'certified' by people with no authorization to certify the election.
* security camera footage of election offices ejecting observers and working after hours.
* security camera footage of election workers running ballots through the machine multiple times.
* security camera footage of election workers filling out ballots after hours.
* several hundred affidavits filed by both Republicans and Democrats testifying of fraud in election offices.
* votes 'arriving' for Biden beyond any reasonable probability.
* shifts in count totals all taking place in election offices that were supposed to be closed.
* attempts by Congress to choose the electors for various States, exceeding their authority.
* relative sizes of rallies between Trump and Biden.

Now you can try to deny this (and other) evidence all you want. It's public record. You can't wish this evidence away.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
18-04-2022 02:30
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(12612)
HarveyH55 wrote: I don't know about landslide victory.

Well now you do. Trump won the record. No candidate ever received as many votes as Trump, and that's his artificially reduced "official" number.

We'll never know how many votes he actually received.

Not only was it a landslide, it was the largest landslide in US history.

The official story is that Biden somehow managed to get even more of a landslide victory ... if that makes any sense. Biden received the US record for a popular vote by, what a strange coincidence, mere thousands more than Trump.

The thought that Biden nonetheless received US record landslide + additional votes in addition to Trump's record number of votes is beyond totally unbelievable. How many rallies did Biden have that had single-digit attendance?
The only double-digit attendance events were the two buses that Biden had arranged to be filled for the day. Even then, many bailed because they weren't being paid enough. Yet we are to believe that more than twice the number of people voted in this election than any other election whereby record numbers supported each candidate ... AND ... simultaneously record numbers did not vote as well.

Hmmmm.
18-04-2022 03:27
HarveyH55Profile picture★★★★★
(4332)
Midterms should be interesting. Democrats can't lose congress, or any of the slight margin they are riding on. Covid is a non-issue anymore. Not sure if the mail-in ballot thing was made permanent. Maybe their Russian friend will pull some truly atrocious stuff, that no civilized human being could possibly ignore. Yeah, can't imagine anything, and I'm fairly creative. If even a fraction of what's being claim on lefty-media, semi-resembles the truth. I can't understand why nobody is jumping in. Biden's sanctions, and promise to send a couple billion over in cash and hardware. Not really going to end the madness, just prolong the death and destruction. Democrats must really get of on such things. The sanctions aren't going to hurt Russia all that much, at the moment. Maybe a year or two down the road. But, Russia does produce and export enough, that some countries depend on that supply. Of course blocking everything Russia sells, mean a much higher demand on what everyone else produces, and hyper-inflation.

America was getting through the pandemic fine under Trump. Biden started destroying the economy his first week. Everything he touches, turns to crap. Border crisis... Just let everyone in on promise to appear, and their word on whether they were criminals or terrorists. Nobody would dare lie to backlogged immigration workers...
RE: Trump played YOU for a chump.18-04-2022 20:32
Im a BM
★★☆☆☆
(199)
Trump played YOU for a chump.

With such compelling evidence and so many Republican appointed judges, surely there must be a courtroom somewhere that will allow the truth to come out.

Surely there must be a competent and morally respectable attorney who could make the case. Somewhere.

Surely after a year and a half, somebody has compiled the EVIDENCE somewhere.

Trump played YOU for a chump.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


IBdaMann wrote:
HarveyH55 wrote: I don't know about landslide victory.

Well now you do. Trump won the record. No candidate ever received as many votes as Trump, and that's his artificially reduced "official" number.

We'll never know how many votes he actually received.

Not only was it a landslide, it was the largest landslide in US history.

The official story is that Biden somehow managed to get even more of a landslide victory ... if that makes any sense. Biden received the US record for a popular vote by, what a strange coincidence, mere thousands more than Trump.

The thought that Biden nonetheless received US record landslide + additional votes in addition to Trump's record number of votes is beyond totally unbelievable. How many rallies did Biden have that had single-digit attendance?
The only double-digit attendance events were the two buses that Biden had arranged to be filled for the day. Even then, many bailed because they weren't being paid enough. Yet we are to believe that more than twice the number of people voted in this election than any other election whereby record numbers supported each candidate ... AND ... simultaneously record numbers did not vote as well.

Hmmmm.
18-04-2022 21:02
GasGuzzler
★★★★★
(2557)
Im a Bowel Movement wrote:
With such compelling evidence and so many Republican appointed judges, surely there must be a courtroom somewhere that will allow the truth to come out.

The chicken shit judges on the Supreme Court need to be removed. Their lives were threatened and they folded.

Im a Bowel Movement wrote:
Surely there must be a competent and morally respectable attorney who could make the case. Somewhere.

Into the Night just laid out all the evidence for you. If you actually wanted to, you could find this stuff too. However, like biogeoclimatechangeglobalwarmingwhateverthefuk, you choose to believe instead of know. (do you REALLY believe trees will stop erosion better than grass?!)

Im a Bowel Movement wrote:
Trump played YOU for a chump.

Biden played everyone for an ignorant chump....but hey, we got what we voted for, right?

Soaring food prices
Soaring energy prices
Soaring home/land prices
Supply chain problems
Afghanistan disasters
Ukraine genocide
Soaring crime rates
Soaring national debt
Rising interest rates

Does anyone even sell a gamma spec that can handle all these blunders?


Studies show that if you force several tubs of peanut butter down the throats of newborns, in some cases it could potentially be toxic. In cities where infant-PB-stuffing is more common, infant deaths increased by over 47% with corresponding increases in dead-infant obesity.. -IBdaMann
RE: And Why It is VERY Relevant to Climate Debate18-04-2022 21:54
sealover
★★★☆☆
(804)
And Why it is VERY Relevant to Climate Debate

Unsupported contrarian assertions are made about a "landslide".

No pretense is made to present any valid evidence.

Just the unsupported contrarian assertion.

There are many ways to communicate about objective reality.

This is not one of them.

And that is why this thread about little orange sore loser is VERY relevant to climate debate.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

sealover wrote:
"Trump won in a landslide" - A Falsifiable Hypothesis

This one requires no advanced degrees or use of buzzwords.

This falsifiable hypothesis has already been falsified.

Our court system has this little requirement for "evidence".

If they had any evidence, why are they keeping it secret?

You don't have to have a PhD to sit on the jury.

But the judge is there to ensure that trolls who hide behind word games aren't allowed to turn it into a clown show.

The clown show TRIED and TRIED in court.

But even TRUMP-APPOINTED JUDGES couldn't pretend that it made any sense.

"Trump won in a landslide" - A Falsifiable Hypothesis

(already thoroughly debunked)

But maybe there is some legitimate "debate"?

Or maybe we just need an unambiguous definition for "landslide" election win, under which LOSING by more than seven million votes doesn't contradict it.
18-04-2022 22:24
HarveyH55Profile picture★★★★★
(4332)
sealover wrote:
And Why it is VERY Relevant to Climate Debate

Unsupported contrarian assertions are made about a "landslide".

No pretense is made to present any valid evidence.

Just the unsupported contrarian assertion.

There are many ways to communicate about objective reality.

This is not one of them.

And that is why this thread about little orange sore loser is VERY relevant to climate debate.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

sealover wrote:
"Trump won in a landslide" - A Falsifiable Hypothesis

This one requires no advanced degrees or use of buzzwords.

This falsifiable hypothesis has already been falsified.

Our court system has this little requirement for "evidence".

If they had any evidence, why are they keeping it secret?

You don't have to have a PhD to sit on the jury.

But the judge is there to ensure that trolls who hide behind word games aren't allowed to turn it into a clown show.

The clown show TRIED and TRIED in court.

But even TRUMP-APPOINTED JUDGES couldn't pretend that it made any sense.

"Trump won in a landslide" - A Falsifiable Hypothesis

(already thoroughly debunked)

But maybe there is some legitimate "debate"?

Or maybe we just need an unambiguous definition for "landslide" election win, under which LOSING by more than seven million votes doesn't contradict it.


Biden's Blunders, are related to 'Climate Change' (the doomsday cult). Liberals hope to tear down all that is good and holy, to rebuilt one world government. Ran, of course by the nanny-state elite, who believe they know what's best for people, other than themselves. They'll make sure you are fed (occasionally), tell you what to think and believe. Assign you a job. You'll do everything you are told, or you'll get a spanking, sent to a 're-education center. Far as your family and friends ever know, you where assigned to another housing unit... Of course, you were probably just dumped into the Soylent Green vat.
18-04-2022 23:14
GasGuzzler
★★★★★
(2557)
squeal rover wrote:
Unsupported contrarian assertions are made about a "landslide".


Good. We're on the same page now. Both of us don't much appreciate unsupported assertions.


Can you support your unsupported assertion that the global temperature is rising?


Studies show that if you force several tubs of peanut butter down the throats of newborns, in some cases it could potentially be toxic. In cities where infant-PB-stuffing is more common, infant deaths increased by over 47% with corresponding increases in dead-infant obesity.. -IBdaMann
Edited on 18-04-2022 23:14
18-04-2022 23:25
HarveyH55Profile picture★★★★★
(4332)
Of course the global temperature is rising. Got up early this morning to mow the lawn, and a few other things. It was a chilly morning, mid-70s. By 1:00pm, I was drenched in sweat, and had to strip down, put on a pair of shorts. Hadn't thought to look at the temperature at the time. Later, though, while chilling in the AC, with a cold beer, it was mid-80s. Least 10 degree increase, in 7-8 hours. And climate-babies whine about one F'ing degree C, over a whole century...
18-04-2022 23:53
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(19383)
Im a BM wrote:
Trump played YOU for a chump.

With such compelling evidence and so many Republican appointed judges, surely there must be a courtroom somewhere that will allow the truth to come out.

It's out. No matter how you try to ignore it or wish it away, it's out.
Im a BM wrote:
Surely there must be a competent and morally respectable attorney who could make the case. Somewhere.

None needed.
Im a BM wrote:
Surely after a year and a half, somebody has compiled the EVIDENCE somewhere.

RQAA. I just listed some of it.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
19-04-2022 00:21
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(19383)
...deleted talking to yourself spam...
sealover wrote:
And Why it is VERY Relevant to Climate Debate

True. Biden is a True Believer, while Trump is not.
sealover wrote:
Unsupported contrarian assertions are made about a "landslide".

RQAA.
sealover wrote:
No pretense is made to present any valid evidence.

RQAA.
sealover wrote:
Just the unsupported contrarian assertion.

RQAA
sealover wrote:
There are many ways to communicate about objective reality.

Buzzword fallacies.
sealover wrote:
This is not one of them.

Void statement.
sealover wrote:
And that is why this thread about little orange sore loser is VERY relevant to climate debate.

You cannot lose what never took place.
You cannot win what never took place.

There was no election in 2020. The election faulted due to election fraud by Democrats.

Biden was not elected. He was installed as part of a silent coup.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
19-04-2022 00:22
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(19383)
HarveyH55 wrote:
sealover wrote:
And Why it is VERY Relevant to Climate Debate

Unsupported contrarian assertions are made about a "landslide".

No pretense is made to present any valid evidence.

Just the unsupported contrarian assertion.

There are many ways to communicate about objective reality.

This is not one of them.

And that is why this thread about little orange sore loser is VERY relevant to climate debate.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

sealover wrote:
"Trump won in a landslide" - A Falsifiable Hypothesis

This one requires no advanced degrees or use of buzzwords.

This falsifiable hypothesis has already been falsified.

Our court system has this little requirement for "evidence".

If they had any evidence, why are they keeping it secret?

You don't have to have a PhD to sit on the jury.

But the judge is there to ensure that trolls who hide behind word games aren't allowed to turn it into a clown show.

The clown show TRIED and TRIED in court.

But even TRUMP-APPOINTED JUDGES couldn't pretend that it made any sense.

"Trump won in a landslide" - A Falsifiable Hypothesis

(already thoroughly debunked)

But maybe there is some legitimate "debate"?

Or maybe we just need an unambiguous definition for "landslide" election win, under which LOSING by more than seven million votes doesn't contradict it.


Biden's Blunders, are related to 'Climate Change' (the doomsday cult). Liberals hope to tear down all that is good and holy, to rebuilt one world government. Ran, of course by the nanny-state elite, who believe they know what's best for people, other than themselves. They'll make sure you are fed (occasionally), tell you what to think and believe. Assign you a job. You'll do everything you are told, or you'll get a spanking, sent to a 're-education center. Far as your family and friends ever know, you where assigned to another housing unit... Of course, you were probably just dumped into the Soylent Green vat.


You are describing The Oligarchy pretty well.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
RE: YES! We WILL REPLACE YOU!19-04-2022 00:41
Im a BM
★★☆☆☆
(199)
You can't chant about how we will not replace you, but it's too late to stop it.

I know you won't go down without a last ditch lashing out, but it's already over.

Goodbye!

You have already been replaced!

You just haven't figured it out yet.

tee hee hee


--------------------------------------------------------------------

HarveyH55 wrote:
Of course the global temperature is rising. Got up early this morning to mow the lawn, and a few other things. It was a chilly morning, mid-70s. By 1:00pm, I was drenched in sweat, and had to strip down, put on a pair of shorts. Hadn't thought to look at the temperature at the time. Later, though, while chilling in the AC, with a cold beer, it was mid-80s. Least 10 degree increase, in 7-8 hours. And climate-babies whine about one F'ing degree C, over a whole century...
19-04-2022 00:49
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(12612)
Im a BM wrote:
You can't chant about how we will not replace you, but it's too late to stop it.

I know you won't go down without a last ditch lashing out, but it's already over.

Goodbye!

Of whom are you speaking? Antecedents, please!

.
Attached image:

19-04-2022 00:50
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(12612)
Im a BM wrote:tee hee hee


Test.
Attached image:

19-04-2022 06:07
HarveyH55Profile picture★★★★★
(4332)
So, you declared jihad on Climate-Debate, still not impressed. You will lose. You've got no minion, just a sock-puppet, nasty one at that. There will be no Armageddon here on May 1st. As with every biogeoclimatologist prophecy, it will fail to materialize, and pushed back another 15-30 years... But bring on the horde of minion. My faith is strong, and I'm comfortable in my beliefs. My God is bigger and stronger than yours.

Im a BM wrote:
You can't chant about how we will not replace you, but it's too late to stop it.

I know you won't go down without a last ditch lashing out, but it's already over.

Goodbye!

You have already been replaced!

You just haven't figured it out yet.

tee hee hee


--------------------------------------------------------------------

HarveyH55 wrote:
Of course the global temperature is rising. Got up early this morning to mow the lawn, and a few other things. It was a chilly morning, mid-70s. By 1:00pm, I was drenched in sweat, and had to strip down, put on a pair of shorts. Hadn't thought to look at the temperature at the time. Later, though, while chilling in the AC, with a cold beer, it was mid-80s. Least 10 degree increase, in 7-8 hours. And climate-babies whine about one F'ing degree C, over a whole century...
19-04-2022 23:49
Im a BM
★★☆☆☆
(199)
No entiendes ni siquiera el idioma.

Mucho menos los conceptos cientificos que se utiliza para comunicar.




































espacio para alejarse del troll asquerosco que vive abajo en el suelo de noche




IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:tee hee hee


Test.
20-04-2022 01:23
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(12612)
Im a BM wrote:No entiendes ni siquiera el idioma.

Eres tu la boca de diarrea. Esperas una gran reunion de discipulos que no existen para que lean tu biblioteca que no existe en cuanto a tu campo de sabiduria que no existe. Eres idiota de vertebra.

?En serio, quieres pelear conmigo en el castellano? Orale, guey.




































espacio para alejarse del troll asquerosco que vive abajo en el suelo de noche




IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:tee hee hee


Test.
[/quote]
20-04-2022 01:36
Im a BM
★★☆☆☆
(199)
Y ahora te toca a ti acusarme de ser MENTIROSO.

Aquellas palabras no son nada mas que buzzwords que no tienen ningun sentido.

Es OBVIO que sealover no entiende NADA del espanol.

Igual como no entiende nada de la quimica, y es OBVIO que jamas logro nada en la ciencia del mundo verdadero.

Cuando yo salgo de este sitio, al mundo verdadero, me dan ELOGIOS por el hecho de que yo sea cientifico sumamente inteligente.

No me hace ningun dano al auto estima cuando un troll asqueroso que no entiende la ciencia en lo mas minimo me insulta.

Ademas, no te das cuenta que eres el unico, aparte de me, que nos comprende?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:No entiendes ni siquiera el idioma.

Eres tu la boca de diarrea. Esperas una gran reunion de discipulos que no existen para que lean tu biblioteca que no existe en cuanto a tu campo de sabiduria que no existe. Eres idiota de vertebra.

?En serio, quieres pelear conmigo en el castellano? Orale, guey.




































espacio para alejarse del troll asquerosco que vive abajo en el suelo de noche




IBdaMann wrote:
Im a BM wrote:tee hee hee


Test.
[/quote]
20-04-2022 04:31
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(12612)
Im a BM wrote:Y ahora te toca a ti acusarme de ser MENTIROSO.

No huevon. Te toca a ti ensen~ar que no eres boca de diarrea. Todos esperan para alguna evidencia de honestidad ... que nunca llega.

Im a BM wrote:Es OBVIO que sealover no entiende NADA del espanol.

No he visto suficiente para saber que si o que no.

Im a BM wrote:Igual como no entiende nada de la quimica,

Que gracioso eres. Inventas esa "bidengastrochemicalifornia" como es algo de verdad. Que fantasia tienes. ... y piensas que creeremos que es una ciencia! Que bruto eres ... y con tantos errores al nivel de lo basico cuando supuestamente eres un "experto" en ciencia.

Que idiota mas bruto eres.

Im a BM wrote:y es OBVIO que jamas logro nada en la ciencia del mundo verdadero.

Logico.

Im a BM wrote:Cuando yo salgo de este sitio, al mundo verdadero, me dan ELOGIOS por el hecho de que yo sea cientifico sumamente inteligente.

Bueno, quieres volver a hablar de tu fantasia. ?Quien pretendes que te elogira? ?Tus seguidores? ?Tu ejercito de seguidores que vienen a visitar a tu "biblioteca"?

Por favor.

?Dime, cuando vendran?
Attached image:

RE: Lock him up! Grand jury criminal inquiry announced13-05-2022 01:32
Im a BM
★★☆☆☆
(199)
Lock him up! Grand jury criminal inquiry announced.

Good news today!

The guy who thrived on chants of "lock her up!" will face charges for the very same crime, times 100.

If Trump won by a landslide, I guess alligators can be amphibians and remain consistent with the paradigm.

Lock him up! Lock him up! Lock him up! Lock him up! Eff him UP!!!




Join the debate "Trump won in a landslide" - A Falsifiable Hypothesis:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Democrat terrorist CIA agent tweets that Trump needs to be murdered just like Lincoln819-08-2022 02:30
Breaking news... Uncensored Trump backup secret camera video of the FBI raid on Trumps home216-08-2022 14:23
Interesting news about Donald Trump (The Don officially to 80 million of us) anyway Trump is415-08-2022 04:08
The real purpose of the raid on Trump is so that the FBI can arrest every person in a Trump hat or shirt014-08-2022 23:50
Elmer Fudd aka Richard Hayden is calling for Trumps execution, because Trump knows how JFK was murdered012-08-2022 19:34
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact