|Magma vortex hypothesis about earthquakes06-05-2021 20:59|
|Magma vortex hypothesis about earthquakes.|
Community of Russian Scientists. https://vk.com/rosuch
The reason for the axial rotation of the Earth is cyclones and anticyclones, which move in the direction of the general transport of air from west to east.
Rotating, the earth's crust carries away magma, due to which dozens of magma vortices are formed, which move along the equator following the Earth's crust. magmatic eddies move relative to the earth's crust with variable speed, sometimes stopping, similar to cyclones and anticyclones.
Blocking anticyclones. http://meteoweb.ru/2018/phen20180730.php
magmatic eddies are one of the mechanisms of the Earth's thermoregulation. A cyclonic magma vortex is a vortex that throws magma up from the center of the Earth. An anticyclonic magma vortex, on the other hand, draws in magma from the upper layers of magma and sends it towards the center of the Earth. Magma vortices, creating pressure and rarefaction between the earth's crust and magma, are one of the causes of vertical stress in the earth's crust. A similar natural phenomenon is observed in the seas and oceans, when a whirlpool rotates under the ice.
When a number of factors coincide, a magma vortex can transform into a tornado.
A water tornado in a matter of minutes draws in thousands of tons of water, and a magma whirlwind, I believe, is more massive and powerful. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tornado_Alley
Atmospheric vortices last for several days and then gradually decay.
Rotating, the magmatic vortex sucks air from the earth's crust. And as soon as the ratio of volcanic gases and air reaches the desired proportion, an explosion occurs, due to which the waves from the source of the earthquake scatter in different directions.
After the explosion, a void is formed in the earthquake source into which magma rushes, for this reason a second shock is possible.
The hypothesis presented can be easily tested if a firecracker is blown up under the ice.
https://youtu.be/UDLobrro2Ao https://youtu.be/zFdF6-qaPSA https://youtu.be/U7pNie2403A
After an earthquake, the epicenter sinks and becomes denser, due to which the flow of air through the micro-crevices decreases, and the earthquake center subsides.
The intensity of earthquakes can be expressed by the following formula: A = m / h.
Where, m is the mass of the combustible mixture.
h is the depth of the combustible mixture.
Harbingers of earthquakes:
1. Underground rumble, tremors of the earth, change in the level of groundwater.
a) At the epicenter, the groundwater level may decrease, and rise along the perimeter of the epicenter.
2. Above the epicenter of a future earthquake, there may be changes in geophysical fields (magnetic, electric, gravitational, etc.).
3. Foreshocks - subsidence of the earth's crust before the main earthquake, due to rarefaction between the earth's crust and magma.
4. Aftershocks - subsidence of the earth's crust after the main earthquake.
5. Aftershocks also appear after underground atomic explosions.
6. One of the causes of aftershocks may be the effect of plaster falling from the ceiling. This is when a massive piece of crust peels off from the inner side of the earth's crust and falls onto the core, due to which a void is formed between the earth's crust and a piece of crust, into which magma then rushes.
The manifestations of volcanic earthquakes are almost indistinguishable from tectonic earthquakes. 90% of volcanoes are located in seismically active zones.
In Japan, an explosion of volcanic gases shattered a mountain 670 m high. In Indonesia, an explosion of a combustible mixture destroyed half of the volcano and caused earthquakes in several cities, and there are quite a few such facts.
Before the eruption of the geyser, the magma vortex stops moving, due to which the vacuum between the magma vortex and the Earth's crust increases. Then, the water descends on hot magma and as a result, a geyser erupts. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1883_eruption_of_Krakatoa
The geological activity of planets depends on the diameter, axial and orbital velocity of the planets.
Geologically active are: Earth, Jupiter, Ceres, Enceladus, Io, etc. The geological activity of Venus and Mercury, due to the slow axial rotation, is extremely low. http://www.evgengusev.narod.ru/spb/zhirnov-2011.html
It is possible that solar activity is the result of the geological activity of the Sun, and sunspots are funnels of magma vortexes. https://uc.xyz/QWPLu?pub=link
Due to the rotation of the Earth, centrifugal force acts on the Earth's crust, but due to the orbital rotation of the Earth, the centrifugal force oscillates, due to which the earth's crust moves. It is also possible that the volume and mass of the Earth grows over the years.
As we can see, the weather above the Earth's crust depends on the speed and direction of rotation of cyclones and anticyclones, and the weather under the Earth's crust depends on the speed and direction of rotation of the magma vortex.
All physical processes that occur in the atmosphere occur both in the ocean and in the Earth's mantle.
"The laws of nature are universal!" (Lao Tzu)
Criticism of the tectonic hypothesis of earthquakes.
1. Why do earthquakes occur both at the junction of tectonic plates and in the center of the plate?
2. The statement that tectonic stress is accumulating in the earth's crust is questionable. (It is easy to check by putting experience).
3. Tectonic plates cannot have the properties of a spring or rubber.
4. Oscillations from earthquakes are transmitted in the form of seismic waves over a distance of more than 10 thousand km.
a) Then why do seismic waves not provoke earthquakes in other regions of the Earth? https://uc.xyz/QWIKu?pub=link
b) Why does an underground nuclear explosion not provoke earthquakes?
5. As a rule, volcanoes and earthquakes occur mainly in the foothills.
a) Why high in the mountains and far from the mountains, they are practically nonexistent?
b) Perhaps the intensity of earthquakes depends on the ability of the earth's crust to transmit gases? It is possible that it is higher in the foothills.
6. Why is the epicenter circular rather than elongated along the fault line? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_of_Fire
7. According to the tectonic hypothesis of earthquakes, a seismic wave moves in the Earth's crust. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seismic_wave
And according to the magma vortex hypothesis, a seismic tsunami wave moves under the Earth's crust.
8. After major earthquakes, a seismic wave goes around half of the globe. I believe that only a seismic tsunami wave, which moves under the Earth's crust, is capable of this. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1897_Assam_earthquake
9. A volcano is a valve for dumping volcanic gases.
The statement that the volcanic eruption is the result of an increase in magma pressure does not correspond to reality, because the greater the magma pressure, the tighter the vent closes. The mouth of the volcano is a cone several kilometers long. For the vent to open, the cork of the volcano must move down and not up, and for this, a vacuum must form under the volcanic mountain. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volcano
10. The statement that the plates move due to the temperature drop in the bowels of the Earth is questionable.
11. It is also doubtful that the plates can sink into the planet's mantle and reach the depths of the outer core.
12. If the lower lithospheric plates easily sink into the Earth's mantle, then during the creeping of the plates, the lower plate should easily sink down.
13. It is believed that the depth of the hypocenter reaches 700 km. Questions arise:
a) How do the plates interact at such a depth, given that the continental crust is about 30 km thick, and the oceanic one is 5 km thick?
b) How does the mechanism of transmission of seismic waves from the source to the epicenter at a distance of 700 km work?
c) According to the magma vortex theory of earthquakes, the diameter of the epicenter (pleistoseist region) depends on the diameter of the magma gate and reaches 100 km. And according to the tectonic hypothesis of earthquakes, the diameter of the epicenter depends on the depth of the source and should be more than 1000 km. What will be the diameter of the epicenter if the depth of the source is 700 km?
14. You can carry out a simple experiment if you move two rubber or wooden plates towards each other in a pool with water.
Continuation: Forum of Akademgorodok Novosibirsk. The science. https://forum.academ.club/index.php?showtopic=1235578
Yusup05 wrote:Magma vortex hypothesis about earthquakes.
When you see the word "vortex," "Greenhouse" or "Climate" thrown into the name, you know it is full-blown religious dogma and that no science will be anywhere to be found.
Yusup05 wrote: The reason for the axial rotation of the Earth is cyclones and anticyclones, ...
This is why the earth's rotation slows dramatically between cyclones.
Yusup05 wrote: ... which move in the direction of the general transport of air from west to east.
Correct. Arrhenius Svante knew that the atmosphere is the driver for earth's rotation back in the late 19th century which is what led him to discover the TRUTH about Greenhouse effect being magnified by the Van Allen belt.
Yusup05 wrote:Rotating, the earth's crust carries away magma,
I simply have got to know ... away to where does the earth's crust carry the magma? ... to outer space? ... to the Van Allen belt? ... to Burbank, California? Where?
Yusup05 wrote:.. due to which dozens of magma vortices are formed, which move along the equator following the Earth's crust.
This explains why earthquakes only occur along the equator. Thank you!
Yusup05 wrote: magmatic eddies move relative to the earth's crust with variable speed, sometimes stopping, similar to cyclones and anticyclones.
Ahhh, excellent! Now we have vortices and eddies and magma anti-cyclones! This one just keeps getting better and better. I'm glad you're not trying to muck it all up by getting all technical with science. You rock!
Yusup05 posted a link to: Quite often, in the atmosphere of temperate and high latitudes, conditions arise when the usual circulation of air masses is disrupted (in the Northern Hemisphere, for example, the western transport). In this case, a blocking type of circulation is established, in which dry and hot weather is observed in one area (in summer), and intense rains occur in other areas. At the same time, the normal inter-latitudinal redistribution of heat and moisture is disturbed.
I read that last line and knew right away that this article is totally legitimate and that it comes directly from the Russian Council of Scientists who currently own science and who speak authoritatively on what they have declared to be "science." Nothing is more critical to Climate than the redistribution of heat, but when you throw in the redistribution of moisture as well, now you're talking potential catastrophic Climate Change. Just ask any Climate scientist. You'll see.
Yusup05 wrote: magmatic eddies are one of the mechanisms of the Earth's thermoregulation.
Tell us something we don't know. The earth is one of the three thermoregulated planets in this solar system. It's the one thing we know for certain.
Yusup05 wrote: A cyclonic magma vortex is a vortex that throws magma up from the center of the Earth.
Brilliant explanation. I don't think we need to mention that there isn't any magma at the center of the earth because the center of the earth is essentially iron and nickel. Throwing that tidbit of information into the mix would be confusing. You did the right thing by not convoluting this amazing theory by interjecting unnecessary geology. Good on you.
Yusup05 wrote: An anticyclonic magma vortex,
These are my personal favorites!
Yusup05 wrote: ... draws in magma from the upper layers of magma and sends it towards the center of the Earth.
Those magma layers merit their own branch of Climate science.
Yusup05 wrote:Magma vortices, creating pressure and rarefaction between the earth's crust and magma, are one of the causes of vertical stress in the earth's crust.
Wait, I have a question. Rarefaction is the result of pressure removal, not of pressure creation. How do you have both in there simultaneously?
Yusup05 wrote:A similar natural phenomenon is observed in the seas and oceans, when a whirlpool rotates under the ice.
If it is under the ice, how is it observed? Wouldn't the person caught in the whirlpool under the ice who is doing the observing be in a bit of "predicament" that will usually affect his ability to recount his observations?
Yusup05 wrote: When a number of factors coincide,
I believe that number needs to be five.
Yusup05 wrote:a magma vortex can transform into a tornado.
I think you mean "a magma anti-cyclone." It's those CAT-5 magma anti-cyclones that barrel through the mantle and leave a wake of devastation.
Yusup05 wrote:A water tornado in a matter of minutes draws in thousands of tons of water, and a magma whirlwind, I believe, is more massive and powerful.
Of course they are. No one has ever observed one but they are what we know.
Yusup05 wrote: Rotating, the magmatic vortex sucks air from the earth's crust.
That's why all the people in the earth's crust at the time end up suffocating.
Yusup05 wrote:And as soon as the ratio of volcanic gases and air reaches the desired proportion,
I spoke with Imam who decides the desired ratio of gases and he generally prefers an 87%/13% mix. Other proportions just don't offer the same feng-shui.
Yusup05 wrote: ... an explosion occurs, due to which the waves from the source of the earthquake scatter in different directions.
So no one ever taught you about fault lines? Interesting. Am I really the first person to teach you that earthquakes are simply the result of the earth's solid crust moving in different directions? Do I get an award for that?
Yusup05 wrote: The intensity of earthquakes can be expressed by the following formula: A = m / h.
Would I be the first person to explain to you that at the present time a number of different magnitude scales are used by scientists and engineers as a measure of the relative size of an earthquake?
The P-wave magnitude (Mb), is defined in terms of the amplitude of the P wave recorded on a standard seismograph.
The surface-wave magnitude (Ms) is defined in terms of the logarithm of the maximum amplitude of ground motion for surface waves with a wave period of 20 seconds.
Yusup05 wrote: The geological activity of planets depends on the diameter, axial and orbital velocity of the planets.
Of course. Scientists calculate earth's orbital velocity from its geological activity. Astronomers make all sorts of claims about earth's position and velocity based on geometry and calculus, but scientists need a solid proxy basis to confirm any scientific calculations.
Yusup05 wrote:Geologically active are: Earth, Jupiter, Ceres, Enceladus, Io, etc.
Yes, this is what we know based on direct measurements.
Yusup05 wrote: As we can see, the weather above the Earth's crust depends on the speed and direction of rotation of cyclones and anticyclones,
... and of course where there are no cyclones or anti-cyclones we just don't have any weather.
Yusup05 wrote: ... and the weather under the Earth's crust depends on the speed and direction of rotation of the magma vortex.
I always enjoy hearing the weather forecast for under the crust on the 5-O'clock news. Oh wait, we don't have any news anymore.
Yusup05 wrote: Criticism of the tectonic hypothesis of earthquakes.
Are you asking why earthquakes occur wherever there are faults?
Yusup05 wrote:2. The statement that tectonic stress is accumulating in the earth's crust is questionable. (It is easy to check by putting experience).
Guessing works for me too. I'm sorry, I meant "estimating."
Yusup05 wrote:3. Tectonic plates cannot have the properties of a spring or rubber.
What are they made of then?
Yusup05 wrote: 4. Oscillations from earthquakes are transmitted in the form of seismic waves over a distance of more than 10 thousand km.
They are not "transmitted" as "seismic waves." They are broadcast as seismic frequencies. That's why everyone knows about them when they happen.
Yusup05 wrote:b) Why does an underground nuclear explosion not provoke earthquakes?
They do ... just on the moon. It's an OSHA requirement that they occur there.
Yusup05 wrote: 5. As a rule, volcanoes and earthquakes occur mainly in the foothills.
Certainly not along fault lines. Good catch.
I have always wondered why people never notice that essentially all volcanoes are on foothills. It's so obvious.
Yusup05 wrote: a) Why high in the mountains and far from the mountains, they are practically nonexistent?
I think of all those morons who refer to volcanoes as mountains. What idiots!
Yusup05 wrote: b) Perhaps the intensity of earthquakes depends on the ability of the earth's crust to transmit gases? It is possible that it is higher in the foothills.
Gases naturally flow more readily through foothills than through the rest of the crust.
Yusup05 wrote:6. Why is the epicenter circular rather than elongated along the fault line?
Back in the late 19th century, Arrhenius Svante knew that earthquake epicenters were dodecahedrons 2.36 meters in diameter, but it wasn't until we were able to closely observe earthquakes with modern satellites that we were able to confirm what he knew all along.
Yusup05 wrote:11. It is also doubtful that the plates can sink into the planet's mantle and reach the depths of the outer core.
I'd like to meet the denier who doubts this. All one needs to do is observe all the tectonic plates that are plummeting right now into the earth's core. NASA and NOAA track them all with GOES satellites.
Great post. A lot of thought went into this one, that's for sure.
|Polar vortex regains it's shape and position over the Arctic Video!!!||5||01-06-2021 06:54|
|Polar vortex pattern suggest we could have a repeat of the 2010 wildfires and drought in Russia! VIDEO!!!||14||14-05-2021 23:13|
|Climate overview: erratic polar vortex - cold anomalies over the US and Europe video!!!||1||22-04-2021 20:44|
|Many worlds hypothesis||20||11-03-2021 21:26|
|polar vortex||54||21-02-2021 19:40|