Do you think the Supreme Court will ban Trump

Spongy Iris wrote:
from running for president?

If Trump was indeed promoting a false narrative that the election was stolen from him, then he had no good reason to promote the protest on 1/6/21. In that case the 14th Amendment is pretty clear, he was engaging in rebellion.

But if Trump had a good reason to promote the protest of Biden's election victory certification, it was not a rebellion, but a valid legal dispute. There have been some reports about the state of GA, that I found pretty convincing, warrant an audit of that state's voting records.

But no courts have so far taken up any cases accusing election fraud.

The vote on banning Trump for president seems certain it will go to the Supreme Court.

So the Supreme Court is in a catch 22.

If they ban Trump, they will enrage about half of USA's voters, but will signal that USA's election process is sound.

If they don't ban Trump, they will be destroying faith in USA's election process, because it will signal that Trump was right to protest the election, and said protest was not a rebellion but a valid legal dispute.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
from running for president?

If Trump was indeed promoting a false narrative that the election was stolen from him, then he had no good reason to promote the protest on 1/6/21. In that case the 14th Amendment is pretty clear, he was engaging in rebellion.

But if Trump had a good reason to promote the protest of Biden's election victory certification, it was not a rebellion, but a valid legal dispute. There have been some reports about the state of GA, that I found pretty convincing, warrant an audit of that state's voting records.

But no courts have so far taken up any cases accusing election fraud.

The vote on banning Trump for president seems certain it will go to the Supreme Court.

So the Supreme Court is in a catch 22.

If they ban Trump, they will enrage about half of USA's voters, but will signal that USA's election process is sound.

If they don't ban Trump, they will be destroying faith in USA's election process, because it will signal that Trump was right to protest the election, and said protest was not a rebellion but a valid legal dispute.

Trump has files that will do more harm to the deep state than all Russian and Chinese nukes combined, so Trump will be allowed to run and the deep state and supreme court will be helping to elect him as well.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
from running for president?

If Trump was indeed promoting a false narrative that the election was stolen from him, then he had no good reason to promote the protest on 1/6/21. In that case the 14th Amendment is pretty clear, he was engaging in rebellion.

But if Trump had a good reason to promote the protest of Biden's election victory certification, it was not a rebellion, but a valid legal dispute. There have been some reports about the state of GA, that I found pretty convincing, warrant an audit of that state's voting records.

But no courts have so far taken up any cases accusing election fraud.

The vote on banning Trump for president seems certain it will go to the Supreme Court.

So the Supreme Court is in a catch 22.

If they ban Trump, they will enrage about half of USA's voters, but will signal that USA's election process is sound.

If they don't ban Trump, they will be destroying faith in USA's election process, because it will signal that Trump was right to protest the election, and said protest was not a rebellion but a valid legal dispute.

Trump has files that will do more harm to the deep state than all Russian and Chinese nukes combined, so Trump will be allowed to run and the deep state and supreme court will be helping to elect him as well.

This sounds like more of what I call, Swan gibberish.

Anyway, you think the Supreme Court will decide the 14th amendment doesn't apply to Trump promoting that the 2020 election was stolen from him?

If so, like I said, the Supreme Court will be agreeing there was and is a case to be made of massive election fraud.

That will be a pretty controversial decision wouldn't you say? How could we ever trust the election system again if the Supreme Court decides in Trump's favor?

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
from running for president?

If Trump was indeed promoting a false narrative that the election was stolen from him, then he had no good reason to promote the protest on 1/6/21. In that case the 14th Amendment is pretty clear, he was engaging in rebellion.

But if Trump had a good reason to promote the protest of Biden's election victory certification, it was not a rebellion, but a valid legal dispute. There have been some reports about the state of GA, that I found pretty convincing, warrant an audit of that state's voting records.

But no courts have so far taken up any cases accusing election fraud.

The vote on banning Trump for president seems certain it will go to the Supreme Court.

So the Supreme Court is in a catch 22.

If they ban Trump, they will enrage about half of USA's voters, but will signal that USA's election process is sound.

If they don't ban Trump, they will be destroying faith in USA's election process, because it will signal that Trump was right to protest the election, and said protest was not a rebellion but a valid legal dispute.

Trump has files that will do more harm to the deep state than all Russian and Chinese nukes combined, so Trump will be allowed to run and the deep state and supreme court will be helping to elect him as well.

This sounds like more of what I call, Swan gibberish.

Anyway, you think the Supreme Court will decide the 14th amendment doesn't apply to Trump promoting that the 2020 election was stolen from him?

If so, like I said, the Supreme Court will be agreeing there was and is a case to be made of massive election fraud.

That will be a pretty controversial decision wouldn't you say? How could we ever trust the election system again if the Supreme Court decides in Trump's favor?

Everyone who watches CNN knows that the people who watch FOX are being lied to. Everyone who watches FOX knows that the people who watch CNN are being lied to. Well guess what, they are all correct as the media/CIA never tells the truth in any instance.

There is no vaccine for covid19, never was as vaccinated people are 16% more likely to die of the disease than non vaxxed

Microwaves do not cook food from the inside out, never did

The CIA is currently releasing the truth about JFK's murder because they did not find the files at Trumps house. Expect Bush to move to Moscow for his safety

What a shame

Swan wrote:

The CIA is currently releasing the truth about JFK's murder because they did not find the files at Trumps house. Expect Bush to move to Moscow for his safety

What a shame

Spongy Iris wrote:
If so, like I said, the Supreme Court will be agreeing there was and is a case to be made of massive election fraud.

That will be a pretty controversial decision wouldn't you say? How could we ever trust the election system again if the Supreme Court decides in Trump's favor?

IBdaMann wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
If so, like I said, the Supreme Court will be agreeing there was and is a case to be made of massive election fraud.

That will be a pretty controversial decision wouldn't you say? How could we ever trust the election system again if the Supreme Court decides in Trump's favor?

It would only be contentious with those who stole the election.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
from running for president?

If Trump was indeed promoting a false narrative that the election was stolen from him, then he had no good reason to promote the protest on 1/6/21. In that case the 14th Amendment is pretty clear, he was engaging in rebellion.

But if Trump had a good reason to promote the protest of Biden's election victory certification, it was not a rebellion, but a valid legal dispute. There have been some reports about the state of GA, that I found pretty convincing, warrant an audit of that state's voting records.

But no courts have so far taken up any cases accusing election fraud.

The vote on banning Trump for president seems certain it will go to the Supreme Court.

So the Supreme Court is in a catch 22.

If they ban Trump, they will enrage about half of USA's voters, but will signal that USA's election process is sound.

If they don't ban Trump, they will be destroying faith in USA's election process, because it will signal that Trump was right to protest the election, and said protest was not a rebellion but a valid legal dispute.

Trump has files that will do more harm to the deep state than all Russian and Chinese nukes combined, so Trump will be allowed to run and the deep state and supreme court will be helping to elect him as well.

This sounds like more of what I call, Swan gibberish.

Anyway, you think the Supreme Court will decide the 14th amendment doesn't apply to Trump promoting that the 2020 election was stolen from him?

If so, like I said, the Supreme Court will be agreeing there was and is a case to be made of massive election fraud.

That will be a pretty controversial decision wouldn't you say? How could we ever trust the election system again if the Supreme Court decides in Trump's favor?

Everyone who watches CNN knows that the people who watch FOX are being lied to. Everyone who watches FOX knows that the people who watch CNN are being lied to. Well guess what, they are all correct as the media/CIA never tells the truth in any instance.

There is no vaccine for covid19, never was as vaccinated people are 16% more likely to die of the disease than non vaxxed

Microwaves do not cook food from the inside out, never did

The CIA is currently releasing the truth about JFK's murder because they did not find the files at Trumps house. Expect Bush to move to Moscow for his safety

What a shame

See, gibberish

The CIA never tells the truth.

The CIA is releasing the truth.

Hmm...

Swan wrote:
[quote][b]
JFK was murdered, Trump not only has the files but he declassified them as President. As long as Trump lives he is the most powerful man on Earth, and that includes Joe who am I Biden in the list of less powerful. People who have literally never been scared of anything are actually terrified that Trump dies in an accident and the 500 or so disk all hit the net. So believe me, everyone in the deep state wants Trump reelected as if he could have been shot that would have been done long ago.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
[quote][b]
JFK was murdered, Trump not only has the files but he declassified them as President. As long as Trump lives he is the most powerful man on Earth, and that includes Joe who am I Biden in the list of less powerful. People who have literally never been scared of anything are actually terrified that Trump dies in an accident and the 500 or so disk all hit the net. So believe me, everyone in the deep state wants Trump reelected as if he could have been shot that would have been done long ago.

You never tell the truth in any instance. There is literally no way I can believe this statement.

Swan wrote:

So are you done pretending to believe that the Earth is encased in glass panels in order to keep your deep double top secret cover?

Silly

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
[quote][b]
JFK was murdered, Trump not only has the files but he declassified them as President. As long as Trump lives he is the most powerful man on Earth, and that includes Joe who am I Biden in the list of less powerful. People who have literally never been scared of anything are actually terrified that Trump dies in an accident and the 500 or so disk all hit the net. So believe me, everyone in the deep state wants Trump reelected as if he could have been shot that would have been done long ago.

You never tell the truth in any instance. There is literally no way I can believe this statement.

Says the moron who believes that the Earth is surrounded by glass panels. Your belief is not required for the FBI to run around in circles like the keystone cops looking for the JFK files as they are doing this quite well with or without you.

Silly

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

So are you done pretending to believe that the Earth is encased in glass panels in order to keep your deep double top secret cover?

Silly

Hey my lower back started killing me about 15 hours ago, and I am aware of no apparent trigger. I can't recall any time my back has been in this much pain. It feels like someone shot a drug into the base of my spine.

And my ear is still humming every night!

So no, it doesn't feel like I'm done...

Maybe in a couple days I can crack it loose... if I can still walk by then!

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

So are you done pretending to believe that the Earth is encased in glass panels in order to keep your deep double top secret cover?

Silly

Hey my lower back started killing me about 15 hours ago, and I am aware of no apparent trigger. I can't recall any time my back has been in this much pain. It feels like someone shot a drug into the base of my spine.

And my ear is still humming every night!

So no, it doesn't feel like I'm done...

Maybe in a couple days I can crack it loose... if I can still walk by then!

Swan wrote:


FBI listening in as they whack off

Swan wrote:
PS. Did you murder any Catholic terrorist nuns yet today?

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
PS. Did you murder any Catholic terrorist nuns yet today?

Psycho nun Amy is on a steady diet of Lithium until she Evanescence...

https://youtu.be/PJGpsL_XYQI?si=tNt4T3kfbLCnAzaB

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
PS. Did you murder any Catholic terrorist nuns yet today?

Psycho nun Amy is on a steady diet of Lithium until she Evanescence...

https://youtu.be/PJGpsL_XYQI?si=tNt4T3kfbLCnAzaB

So you are cool with the FBI murdering nuns

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
PS. Did you murder any Catholic terrorist nuns yet today?

Psycho nun Amy is on a steady diet of Lithium until she Evanescence...

https://youtu.be/PJGpsL_XYQI?si=tNt4T3kfbLCnAzaB

So you are cool with the FBI murdering nuns

I have no knowledge of what you speak.

I can't speak Swan Gibberish, and I don't understand James Babble.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
PS. Did you murder any Catholic terrorist nuns yet today?

Psycho nun Amy is on a steady diet of Lithium until she Evanescence...

https://youtu.be/PJGpsL_XYQI?si=tNt4T3kfbLCnAzaB

So you are cool with the FBI murdering nuns

I have no knowledge of what you speak.

I can't speak Swan Gibberish, and I don't understand James Babble.

So you are an FBI agent and are embarrassed that you hunt terrorist nuns for a living

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
PS. Did you murder any Catholic terrorist nuns yet today?

Psycho nun Amy is on a steady diet of Lithium until she Evanescence...

https://youtu.be/PJGpsL_XYQI?si=tNt4T3kfbLCnAzaB

So you are cool with the FBI murdering nuns

I have no knowledge of what you speak.

I can't speak Swan Gibberish, and I don't understand James Babble.

So you are an FBI agent and are embarrassed that you hunt terrorist nuns for a living

Ok you got me. I have been practicing Swan Gibberish.

I am a Feline Body Investigator.

I was feeding 4 cool cats yogurt, cooked through a long fluorescent light tube, powered by la coeur d'amour.

Pardon my French.

Then the tube went limp, and all the cats climbed down the fire escape.

They keep sneaking around my property, and I'm marking off how many days it takes before they disappear.

I'm almost up to 635 days.

But... every day...

https://youtu.be/LjMffHG1V_Q?feature=shared

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
PS. Did you murder any Catholic terrorist nuns yet today?

Psycho nun Amy is on a steady diet of Lithium until she Evanescence...

https://youtu.be/PJGpsL_XYQI?si=tNt4T3kfbLCnAzaB

So you are cool with the FBI murdering nuns

I have no knowledge of what you speak.

I can't speak Swan Gibberish, and I don't understand James Babble.

So you are an FBI agent and are embarrassed that you hunt terrorist nuns for a living

Ok you got me. I have been practicing Swan Gibberish.

I am a Feline Body Investigator.

I was feeding 4 cool cats yogurt, cooked through a long fluorescent light tube, powered by la coeur d'amour.

Pardon my French.

Then the tube went limp, and all the cats climbed down the fire escape.

They keep sneaking around my property, and I'm marking off how many days it takes before they disappear.

I'm almost up to 635 days.

But... every day...

https://youtu.be/LjMffHG1V_Q?feature=shared

What is the FBI memo against traditional Catholics?
Under the guise of tackling the threat of domestic terrorism, the memorandum painted so-called certain "radical-traditionalist Catholics" (RTCs) as violent extremists and proposed opportunities for the FBI to infiltrate Catholic churches as a form of "threat mitigation." The FBI's Richmond memorandum is a startling ...Dec 4, 2023 reminder that Americans' civil liberties and core Constitutional rights must be vigorously guarded against government overreach, including in this case from an overzealous federal law enforcement agency.

In February 2023, the Committee began its oversight after whistleblower Kyle Seraphin revealed the existence of the Richmond memorandum in internal FBI systems. In April 2023, after the FBI failed to fully cooperate with the oversight, Chairman Jordan issued a subpoena to Director Christopher Wray, requesting documents related to the memorandum.

The Committee and Select Subcommittee's oversight shows that the FBI abused its counterterrorism tools to target Catholic Americans as potential domestic terrorists. The Committee and Select Subcommittee discovered that the FBI relied on at least one undercover agent to develop its assessment and the FBI even proposed developing sources among the Catholic clergy and church leadership. Not only did the FBI propose to develop sources, but it already interviewed a priest and choir director affiliated with a Catholic church in Richmond, Virginia for the memorandum. Most concerning of all, without the disclosure of the whistleblower, the Richmond memorandum would still be operative in FBI systems, violating the religious liberties of millions of Catholic Americans.

So again are you still a proud FBI nun hunter?

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
PS. Did you murder any Catholic terrorist nuns yet today?

Psycho nun Amy is on a steady diet of Lithium until she Evanescence...

https://youtu.be/PJGpsL_XYQI?si=tNt4T3kfbLCnAzaB

So you are cool with the FBI murdering nuns

I have no knowledge of what you speak.

I can't speak Swan Gibberish, and I don't understand James Babble.

So you are an FBI agent and are embarrassed that you hunt terrorist nuns for a living

Ok you got me. I have been practicing Swan Gibberish.

I am a Feline Body Investigator.

I was feeding 4 cool cats yogurt, cooked through a long fluorescent light tube, powered by la coeur d'amour.

Pardon my French.

Then the tube went limp, and all the cats climbed down the fire escape.

They keep sneaking around my property, and I'm marking off how many days it takes before they disappear.

I'm almost up to 635 days.

But... every day...

https://youtu.be/LjMffHG1V_Q?feature=shared

What is the FBI memo against traditional Catholics?
Under the guise of tackling the threat of domestic terrorism, the memorandum painted so-called certain "radical-traditionalist Catholics" (RTCs) as violent extremists and proposed opportunities for the FBI to infiltrate Catholic churches as a form of "threat mitigation." The FBI's Richmond memorandum is a startling ...Dec 4, 2023 reminder that Americans' civil liberties and core Constitutional rights must be vigorously guarded against government overreach, including in this case from an overzealous federal law enforcement agency.

In February 2023, the Committee began its oversight after whistleblower Kyle Seraphin revealed the existence of the Richmond memorandum in internal FBI systems. In April 2023, after the FBI failed to fully cooperate with the oversight, Chairman Jordan issued a subpoena to Director Christopher Wray, requesting documents related to the memorandum.

The Committee and Select Subcommittee's oversight shows that the FBI abused its counterterrorism tools to target Catholic Americans as potential domestic terrorists. The Committee and Select Subcommittee discovered that the FBI relied on at least one undercover agent to develop its assessment and the FBI even proposed developing sources among the Catholic clergy and church leadership. Not only did the FBI propose to develop sources, but it already interviewed a priest and choir director affiliated with a Catholic church in Richmond, Virginia for the memorandum. Most concerning of all, without the disclosure of the whistleblower, the Richmond memorandum would still be operative in FBI systems, violating the religious liberties of millions of Catholic Americans.

So again are you still a proud FBI nun hunter?

Can't really be proud unless my Feline Body Investigation is successful and becomes knowledge. So TBD.

If successful, it would give churches a purpose other than chanting like blind mice.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
PS. Did you murder any Catholic terrorist nuns yet today?

Psycho nun Amy is on a steady diet of Lithium until she Evanescence...

https://youtu.be/PJGpsL_XYQI?si=tNt4T3kfbLCnAzaB

So you are cool with the FBI murdering nuns

I have no knowledge of what you speak.

I can't speak Swan Gibberish, and I don't understand James Babble.

So you are an FBI agent and are embarrassed that you hunt terrorist nuns for a living

Ok you got me. I have been practicing Swan Gibberish.

I am a Feline Body Investigator.

I was feeding 4 cool cats yogurt, cooked through a long fluorescent light tube, powered by la coeur d'amour.

Pardon my French.

Then the tube went limp, and all the cats climbed down the fire escape.

They keep sneaking around my property, and I'm marking off how many days it takes before they disappear.

I'm almost up to 635 days.

But... every day...

https://youtu.be/LjMffHG1V_Q?feature=shared

What is the FBI memo against traditional Catholics?
Under the guise of tackling the threat of domestic terrorism, the memorandum painted so-called certain "radical-traditionalist Catholics" (RTCs) as violent extremists and proposed opportunities for the FBI to infiltrate Catholic churches as a form of "threat mitigation." The FBI's Richmond memorandum is a startling ...Dec 4, 2023 reminder that Americans' civil liberties and core Constitutional rights must be vigorously guarded against government overreach, including in this case from an overzealous federal law enforcement agency.

In February 2023, the Committee began its oversight after whistleblower Kyle Seraphin revealed the existence of the Richmond memorandum in internal FBI systems. In April 2023, after the FBI failed to fully cooperate with the oversight, Chairman Jordan issued a subpoena to Director Christopher Wray, requesting documents related to the memorandum.

The Committee and Select Subcommittee's oversight shows that the FBI abused its counterterrorism tools to target Catholic Americans as potential domestic terrorists. The Committee and Select Subcommittee discovered that the FBI relied on at least one undercover agent to develop its assessment and the FBI even proposed developing sources among the Catholic clergy and church leadership. Not only did the FBI propose to develop sources, but it already interviewed a priest and choir director affiliated with a Catholic church in Richmond, Virginia for the memorandum. Most concerning of all, without the disclosure of the whistleblower, the Richmond memorandum would still be operative in FBI systems, violating the religious liberties of millions of Catholic Americans.

So again are you still a proud FBI nun hunter?

Can't really be proud unless my Feline Body Investigation is successful and becomes knowledge. So TBD.

If successful, it would give churches a purpose other than chanting like blind mice.

LOL, the FBI isn't scared of blind mice, it's scared of every Catholic grandma having hordes of automatic weapons including missiles and launchers in their basement. So you go right ahead and keep hunting nuns you ignorant piece of shit.

PS. And remember when the FBI puts up a new building, the first ones in are the Catholics with the concrete, and there is nothing that you can do about this fact. Except pull your hair out that is

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

So stop being so silly

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:
PS. Did you murder any Catholic terrorist nuns yet today?

Psycho nun Amy is on a steady diet of Lithium until she Evanescence...

https://youtu.be/PJGpsL_XYQI?si=tNt4T3kfbLCnAzaB

So you are cool with the FBI murdering nuns

I have no knowledge of what you speak.

I can't speak Swan Gibberish, and I don't understand James Babble.

So you are an FBI agent and are embarrassed that you hunt terrorist nuns for a living

Ok you got me. I have been practicing Swan Gibberish.

I am a Feline Body Investigator.

I was feeding 4 cool cats yogurt, cooked through a long fluorescent light tube, powered by la coeur d'amour.

Pardon my French.

Then the tube went limp, and all the cats climbed down the fire escape.

They keep sneaking around my property, and I'm marking off how many days it takes before they disappear.

I'm almost up to 635 days.

But... every day...

https://youtu.be/LjMffHG1V_Q?feature=shared

What is the FBI memo against traditional Catholics?
Under the guise of tackling the threat of domestic terrorism, the memorandum painted so-called certain "radical-traditionalist Catholics" (RTCs) as violent extremists and proposed opportunities for the FBI to infiltrate Catholic churches as a form of "threat mitigation." The FBI's Richmond memorandum is a startling ...Dec 4, 2023 reminder that Americans' civil liberties and core Constitutional rights must be vigorously guarded against government overreach, including in this case from an overzealous federal law enforcement agency.

In February 2023, the Committee began its oversight after whistleblower Kyle Seraphin revealed the existence of the Richmond memorandum in internal FBI systems. In April 2023, after the FBI failed to fully cooperate with the oversight, Chairman Jordan issued a subpoena to Director Christopher Wray, requesting documents related to the memorandum.

The Committee and Select Subcommittee's oversight shows that the FBI abused its counterterrorism tools to target Catholic Americans as potential domestic terrorists. The Committee and Select Subcommittee discovered that the FBI relied on at least one undercover agent to develop its assessment and the FBI even proposed developing sources among the Catholic clergy and church leadership. Not only did the FBI propose to develop sources, but it already interviewed a priest and choir director affiliated with a Catholic church in Richmond, Virginia for the memorandum. Most concerning of all, without the disclosure of the whistleblower, the Richmond memorandum would still be operative in FBI systems, violating the religious liberties of millions of Catholic Americans.

So again are you still a proud FBI nun hunter?

Can't really be proud unless my Feline Body Investigation is successful and becomes knowledge. So TBD.

If successful, it would give churches a purpose other than chanting like blind mice.

LOL, the FBI isn't scared of blind mice, it's scared of every Catholic grandma having hordes of automatic weapons including missiles and launchers in their basement. So you go right ahead and keep hunting nuns you ignorant piece of shit.

PS. And remember when the FBI puts up a new building, the first ones in are the Catholics with the concrete, and there is nothing that you can do about this fact. Except pull your hair out that is

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

So stop being so silly

Catholics have the reputation for having big families, and starting the growth of those families from a young age, much like me.

But I don't imagine any of the Catholic grandmas really believe the story of Sarah and Abraham is true. I bet they would be best demographic to preach to, if my investigation is successful.

Spongy Iris wrote:
if Trump had a good reason to promote the protest of Biden's election victory certification, it was not a rebellion, but a valid legal dispute.

Jakob wrote:
­
­

Spongy Iris wrote:
if Trump had a good reason to promote the protest of Biden's election victory certification, it was not a rebellion, but a valid legal dispute.

That is where I think it goes completely wrong for all too many Americans.

If you use your voters as a violent army against the Capitol, and people are killed, it has nothing to do with a legal dispute. It is anarchistic gang behavior.

And when people are killed because of it, it is murder, and the leader who sent them should not go free.

Nearly half of Trump's voters believe the storming of Congress was an FBI conspiracy.
That is just too stupid because Trumps speech to his voters is documented on video.
So, if it was FBI, then Trump must be the FBI.

The rest of them think it was long ago, so it is time to forget about it and move on.
Well if it had been someone in their own family that had been killed I am not sure they would think like that.
And legally, as far as I know, there is also no statute of limitations on murder.
This is again an anarchist way of thinking.


­

Jakob wrote:
­

Spongy Iris


Well written.

You call it "insurrection or rebellion". Why not a "coup attempt".?

The Republicans better start looking for another candidate.
If we look at history I believe it is fair to say they have done a lot better before, so they just have to do that again.


­

Jakob wrote:
­

Spongy Iris


Well written.

You call it "insurrection or rebellion". Why not a "coup attempt".?

The Republicans better start looking for another candidate.
If we look at history I believe it is fair to say they have done a lot better before, so they just have to do that again.


­

James_ wrote:

Jakob wrote:
­

Spongy Iris


Well written.

You call it "insurrection or rebellion". Why not a "coup attempt".?

The Republicans better start looking for another candidate.
If we look at history I believe it is fair to say they have done a lot better before, so they just have to do that again.


­

I think he is using 3 or 4 accounts in this forum. When his different accounts supports him then he becomes credible. If you consider what is happening to Palestine, that is democracy.
The Republican party wants the support of the Christian church. It's like Faust made a deal with someone. I tend to agree with Putin, the West has become fascist. I'm just surprised that he has not Made U.N. Resolution 181, Article 39 an issue.
The Security Council shall determine the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression and shall make recommendations, or decide what measures shall be taken in accordance with Articles 4 and 42, to maintain or restore international peace and security.
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/unchart.asp#art39

What has led IMO to 4 wars this century.

Swan wrote:

LOL, Putin loves you too. Shit fer brainz

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:

LOL, Putin loves you too. Shit fer brainz

Товаречь, Я вас люблю. Ты правда над итим. как ты знаешь?
Он имя Bладимирь Путинь!

Given the choice between him and......

Swan wrote:

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:

LOL, Putin loves you too. Shit fer brainz

Товаречь, Я вас люблю. Ты правда над итим. как ты знаешь?
Он имя Bладимирь Путинь!

Given the choice between him and......

You are free to move to Russia and salute Vlad your hero

Shitferbrainz