Do you think the Supreme Court will ban Trump

Spongy Iris wrote:
I don't know about any coup charges. He fired up a crowd with statements that had been determined to be lies in the court of law, in rebellion of the certifying of election tabulations. That crowd didn't seem to be attempting to seize power.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Perhaps a winning argument for Trump to assert his 1st Amendment right to Free Speech, even though the court of law determined his statements to be lies, is that he believes his election loss was a result of divine intervention.

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:

LOL, Putin loves you too. Shit fer brainz

Товаречь, Я вас люблю. Ты правда над итим. как ты знаешь?
Он имя Bладимирь Путинь!

Given the choice between him and......

You are free to move to Russia and salute Vlad your hero

Shitferbrainz

And yet you say you'd molest children but then you'd be evil. Simple rule
of law. Under 18? 2 consenting teenagers. Over 18? 2 consenting adults.
I'm not a consenting adult when it comes to you. Even if I were gay (I'm not), you're a white supremacist. Go to a gay forum Alan and tell them you like role playing. You're a preacher looking for a "little" boy who needs to be taught
how...... what was it you told me? You'll call my "daddy" and then I'll be in
trouble?
You need to post that in a gay forum. You'll find what you're looking for. And yet
you've never been banned from a forum. And Alan, when the church kept me from having a family, they did not support 2 consenting adults being in a relationship.
If I want to have a woman in my life, it's not their decision to make.

Swan wrote:

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:

LOL, Putin loves you too. Shit fer brainz

Товаречь, Я вас люблю. Ты правда над итим. как ты знаешь?
Он имя Bладимирь Путинь!

Given the choice between him and......

You are free to move to Russia and salute Vlad your hero

Shitferbrainz

And yet you say you'd molest children but then you'd be evil. Simple rule
of law. Under 18? 2 consenting teenagers. Over 18? 2 consenting adults.
I'm not a consenting adult when it comes to you. Even if I were gay (I'm not), you're a white supremacist. Go to a gay forum Alan and tell them you like role playing. You're a preacher looking for a "little" boy who needs to be taught
how...... what was it you told me? You'll call my "daddy" and then I'll be in
trouble?
You need to post that in a gay forum. You'll find what you're looking for. And yet
you've never been banned from a forum. And Alan, when the church kept me from having a family, they did not support 2 consenting adults being in a relationship.
If I want to have a woman in my life, it's not their decision to make.

I have two grown children and a wife, you have nothing except your jealousy and your inbred desire to not be a failed detective. So again if Alan abused you, call the FBI now or go back to bonking your mother in the barn. My guess is that the photos of your home are fake and part of your deep cover that I just Fuc-ked.

PS. Bang your mother once more for me, son and tell her that I miss her, except for the stench.

Now have a nice day

Jakob wrote:
­

Spongy Iris wrote:
I don't know about any coup charges. He fired up a crowd with statements that had been determined to be lies in the court of law, in rebellion of the certifying of election tabulations. That crowd didn't seem to be attempting to seize power.

They did stop the procedure with the purpose to make Trump keep his job.
Outside they had a noose waiting for Mike Pence.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Perhaps a winning argument for Trump to assert his 1st Amendment right to Free Speech, even though the court of law determined his statements to be lies, is that he believes his election loss was a result of divine intervention.

Don't you have laws against planning and endorsing terror in the US.?



­

Jakob wrote:
If Trump had a good reason to promote the protest of Biden's election victory certification, it was not a rebellion, but a valid legal dispute.

Jakob wrote:
That is where I think it goes completely wrong for all too many Americans.

Jakob wrote:
If you use your voters as a violent army against the Capitol, and people are killed, it has nothing to do with a legal dispute. It is anarchistic gang behavior.

Jakob wrote:
And when people are killed because of it, it is murder, and the leader who sent them should not go free.

Jakob wrote:
Nearly half of Trump's voters believe the storming of Congress was an FBI conspiracy.
That is just too stupid because Trumps speech to his voters is documented on video.

Jakob wrote:
Well if it had been someone in their own family that had been killed I am not sure they would think like that.

Jakob wrote:
And legally, as far as I know, there is also no statute of limitations on murder.

Jakob wrote:
Swan

Has it ever occurred to you mind that you could be spamming, and that can lead to a ban.?
If so, would you care about it.?

GasGuzzler wrote:

Jakob wrote:
If Trump had a good reason to promote the protest of Biden's election victory certification, it was not a rebellion, but a valid legal dispute.

Swan wrote:
I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:

LOL, Putin loves you too. Shit fer brainz

Товаречь, Я вас люблю. Ты правда над итим. как ты знаешь?
Он имя Bладимирь Путинь!

Given the choice between him and......

You are free to move to Russia and salute Vlad your hero

Shitferbrainz

And yet you say you'd molest children but then you'd be evil. Simple rule
of law. Under 18? 2 consenting teenagers. Over 18? 2 consenting adults.
I'm not a consenting adult when it comes to you. Even if I were gay (I'm not), you're a white supremacist. Go to a gay forum Alan and tell them you like role playing. You're a preacher looking for a "little" boy who needs to be taught
how...... what was it you told me? You'll call my "daddy" and then I'll be in
trouble?
You need to post that in a gay forum. You'll find what you're looking for. And yet
you've never been banned from a forum. And Alan, when the church kept me from having a family, they did not support 2 consenting adults being in a relationship.
If I want to have a woman in my life, it's not their decision to make.

I have two grown children and a wife, you have nothing except your jealousy and your inbred desire to not be a failed detective. So again if Alan abused you, call the FBI now or go back to bonking your mother in the barn. My guess is that the photos of your home are fake and part of your deep cover that I just Fuc-ked.

PS. Bang your mother once more for me, son and tell her that I miss her, except for the stench.

Now have a nice day

ibdamann supports you molesting me. I saved your posts Alan. You told me that
the church will support you raping me like ibdamann does, why he won't ban you.
I do wonder how many children you've molested. I can't believe I'm your only victim and yet ibdamann has said it's discrimination to ban a child molester. I think he's Russian.

James_ wrote:
I tend to agree with Putin, the West has become fascist.

Jakob wrote:
­

Where did the false accusations about a stolen election come from.?

Here is a saying to think about:

"A thief believes that everybody steals."



­

Jakob wrote:
­

GasGuzzler wrote:

Jakob wrote:
If Trump had a good reason to promote the protest of Biden's election victory certification, it was not a rebellion, but a valid legal dispute.

I didn't write that.
If you can't quote right you are not trustworthy.­

Jakob wrote:
Reason or not, nobody are allowed to take the law into their own hands.

Jakob wrote:
I don't know how anyone can imagine how they could stop the procedure just with words.

Jakob wrote:
But I can imagine a coward doesn't want to take the responsibility.

Jakob wrote:
­

James_ wrote:
I tend to agree with Putin, the West has become fascist.

Among other things Putin uses Trumps unfair COVID blame game and false accusations against China to gain terrain as warlord in Europe.
If he is not stopped it is pretty easy to imagine what it will do to the USA later.
Putins talk about Nazism is war propaganda to make the Russians think it is the West that is the aggressor when he allied with Iran and North Korea invades Ukraine. If the US is not aware of that and act accordingly the world will dissolve further with no end to wars. It has already started.



And wars will delay help to the climate, and that will cause more disasters and conflicts. That is one more tipping point we have to prevent the world from reaching.


­

James_ wrote:

Jakob wrote:
­

James_ wrote:
I tend to agree with Putin, the West has become fascist.

Among other things Putin uses Trumps unfair COVID blame game and false accusations against China to gain terrain as warlord in Europe.
If he is not stopped it is pretty easy to imagine what it will do to the USA later.
Putins talk about Nazism is war propaganda to make the Russians think it is the West that is the aggressor when he allied with Iran and North Korea invades Ukraine. If the US is not aware of that and act accordingly the world will dissolve further with no end to wars. It has already started.



And wars will delay help to the climate, and that will cause more disasters and conflicts. That is one more tipping point we have to prevent the world from reaching.


­

England, U.S. and the U.N. are basically responsible for the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Ukraine and the Middle East. I'll have to flee the U.S. to have a life.
SWAN and whatever name he uses has stalked me for 18 years saying he owns me. He gets murder in his blood when I post with other people.
He has posted that I have to do exactly what he says if I want to live and when he finds out where I live, he'll becoming for me. That's his right while I have no right to a life in the U.S. I went from a Norwegian accent to a significant hearing loss.
What happens to people associated with Norway in the U.S. He was wishing his American father-in-law Happy Birthday! so his American father-in-law killed him. Why I take Swans threats seriously.
https://metro.co.uk/2019/10/04/dad-accidentally-shoots-son-in-law-dead-after-he-jumped-out-of-bush-to-surprise-him-10862450/

Why there are 4 wars this century, After WW II, England and the U.S. controlled the United Nations. England and the U.S. gave Poland to the Soviet Union.
U..N. Resolution 181 and its Partition Plan of 1947.
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/res181.asp
Article 39;
The Security Council shall determine the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression and shall make recommendations, or decide what measures shall be taken in accordance with Articles 4 and 42, to maintain or restore international peace and security.
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/unchart.asp#art39

The Partition Plan of 1947 (the attached image).
The plan envisages the division of Palestine into 3 parts: a Jewish state, an Arab State (dark tint), and the City of Jerusalem (white), to be placed under an International Trusteeship system. 1947, United Nations (Lake Success), New York
https://www.un.org/unispal/history/

England made Palestine an British colony for the purpose of giving to Judes.
Also, my family in Norway has told me what it was like living under occupation by the 3rd Reich and Swan is very much like the gestapo of the 3rd Reich. And he's typical of many Americans. He'll say he is a "Christian" and when I leave the U.S. he'll become very famous for telling everyone that he has been saying to me; Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye. Matthew 7:5.
The 3rd Reich told Norwegians, "we are saving you from the English".
IMO, a 2 State solution would've prevented 4 wars this century. The cost of those wars for the U.S. alone is over $2 Trillion with 45,000 American deaths. The civilian deaths in post 9/11 wars range from England saying 363,000 to other people saying as high as 4.5 million.
Diplomacy (a 2 State solution) would saved both money and lives. Swan says he is a patriotic American and people support him saying I have to prove I deserve a life in the U.S. Why I'll have to move to another country.

And for anything I'm doing now, once I have surgery I'll walk away from everything. This is because Alan Bauldree taught through emotional abuse over an 18 year period while threatening me. If I say it is my work then when I am dead they will say I was dancing for Alan Bauldree, my teacher. So only he will be able to talk about it because he can explain how his "tough love" and threats of rape are effective teaching tools.

About 370 have been charged with assaulting, resisting or obstructing officers or employees. Including 112 people who have been charged with using a deadly or dangerous weapon or causing serious injury to an officer.

- About 970 people have been charged with trespassing into a federal building. Of those, 104 are charged with being in a prohibited area with a dangerous or deadly weapon.

these people are not going to take it any longer. They're not going to take it any longer.
--
We will not take it anymore, and that's what this is all about. And to use a favorite term, that all of you people really came up with, we will Stop the Steal!
--
if Mike Pence does the right thing, we win the election.
--
All Vice President Pence has to do is send it back to the states to recertify, and we become President, and you are the happiest people. And I, actually I just spoke to Mike, I said "Mike, that doesn't take courage. What takes courage is to do nothing. That takes courage, and then we're stuck with a President who lost the election by a lot and we have to live with that for four more years." We're just not going to let that happen.

Jakob wrote:
­



GasGuzzler


The pictures from that day don't lie.
This does not look like a peaceful crowd:
https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/udland/billeder-amerikansk-mareridt-da-trump-tilhaengere-stormede-kongressen


https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/udland/overblik-ulovlig-indtraengen-overfald-paa-betjente-og-tilskyndelse-til-oproer#!/

About 370 have been charged with assaulting, resisting or obstructing officers or employees. Including 112 people who have been charged with using a deadly or dangerous weapon or causing serious injury to an officer.

- About 970 people have been charged with trespassing into a federal building. Of those, 104 are charged with being in a prohibited area with a dangerous or deadly weapon.

The quote you wrote with red letters looks right.
Later (too late) he also went on TV and told the crowd to go home in peace.
But I don't think it changes the big picture at all.
To me it more looks like an attempt to save himself.


https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Donald_Trump%27s_Save_America_Rally_Speech

these people are not going to take it any longer. They're not going to take it any longer.
--
We will not take it anymore, and that's what this is all about. And to use a favorite term, that all of you people really came up with, we will Stop the Steal!
--
if Mike Pence does the right thing, we win the election.
--
All Vice President Pence has to do is send it back to the states to recertify, and we become President, and you are the happiest people. And I, actually I just spoke to Mike, I said "Mike, that doesn't take courage. What takes courage is to do nothing. That takes courage, and then we're stuck with a President who lost the election by a lot and we have to live with that for four more years." We're just not going to let that happen.

I remember when Al Gore lost the election in a close race. He was not happy but he knew the rules of the game, and he took it like a man.


I hope you find a new candidate that we can all be proud of.
­­

James_ wrote:
Alan, I am building your inventions. You are teaching me how to build what you. You will receive 100% and ALL monies. And I will say I cannot profit from what you taught me, only you can.
And I will ask Thailand for both religious sanctuary and an ileostomy. I should get a decent settlement from malpractice so I won't need your money. And only you will be able to talk about your inventions and science because you have shown where you know math and science.
And you will need to file your own patent with the USPTO. Failure on your part to obtain patents
for your work will require me to destroy your inventions.
And in the future I will not be able to do any work that people might consider important then that would prove that you are a Christian Prophet. I do know Jesus loves you while he doesn't like me. Why you are my teacher.

Swan wrote:

James_ wrote:
Alan, I am building your inventions. You are teaching me how to build what you. You will receive 100% and ALL monies. And I will say I cannot profit from what you taught me, only you can.
And I will ask Thailand for both religious sanctuary and an ileostomy. I should get a decent settlement from malpractice so I won't need your money. And only you will be able to talk about your inventions and science because you have shown where you know math and science.
And you will need to file your own patent with the USPTO. Failure on your part to obtain patents
for your work will require me to destroy your inventions.
And in the future I will not be able to do any work that people might consider important then that would prove that you are a Christian Prophet. I do know Jesus loves you while he doesn't like me. Why you are my teacher.

What I should have done is patent the removable SCSI hot swap hard drive I built with an erector set frame, then I could have sold it to Apple or Western Digital for at least 7 figures. Yawn

James_ wrote:
Trump incited a riot.

James_ wrote:
He should be tried for treason.

James_ wrote:
When he said take back the election he was quoting Adolph Hitler.

keepit wrote:
There is the danger that the courts might ban trump. Otherwise they would have already taken the case.

Into the Night wrote:

keepit wrote:
There is the danger that the courts might ban trump. Otherwise they would have already taken the case.

No court has the authority to change the Constitution of the United States no any State constitution.

They cannot legally ban Trump.

Following the British announcement that it would end its authority over Palestine, the question of sovereignty was considered by the United Nations Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP). The UNSCOP report recommended the division of the British Mandate-controlled area of Palestine into two states, one Arab and one Jewish, with Jerusalem to be an "international" city. According to the plan, the two states, roughly equal in size and natural resources, would cooperate on major economic issues, sharing their currency, roads, and government services over the territory.

The Zionist leadership reluctantly accepted the partition plan, as it offered at least two of their requirements — sovereignty and control over immigration. The Palestinian Arabs and the surrounding Arab nations rejected it outright, refusing to accept the establishment of a Jewish state in the region.

In UN Resolution 181, the General Assembly of the United Nations voted to approve the partition plan November 29, 1947 by a vote of 33 to 13, with 10 abstentions.
https://www.adl.org/resources/action-guide/united-nations-partition-plan-1947-un-resolution-181

The Security Council shall determine the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression and shall make recommendations, or decide what measures shall be taken in accordance with Articles 4 and 42, to maintain or restore international peace and security.
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/unchart.asp#art39

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/about-educational-outreach/activity-resources/us

James_ wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

keepit wrote:
There is the danger that the courts might ban trump. Otherwise they would have already taken the case.

No court has the authority to change the Constitution of the United States no any State constitution.

They cannot legally ban Trump.

This shows in a way that both the rule of law and what the Constitution was
meant to create is word salad. Look at U.N. Resolution 181 and what Judes said;

Following the British announcement that it would end its authority over Palestine, the question of sovereignty was considered by the United Nations Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP). The UNSCOP report recommended the division of the British Mandate-controlled area of Palestine into two states, one Arab and one Jewish, with Jerusalem to be an "international" city. According to the plan, the two states, roughly equal in size and natural resources, would cooperate on major economic issues, sharing their currency, roads, and government services over the territory.

The Zionist leadership reluctantly accepted the partition plan, as it offered at least two of their requirements — sovereignty and control over immigration. The Palestinian Arabs and the surrounding Arab nations rejected it outright, refusing to accept the establishment of a Jewish state in the region.

In UN Resolution 181, the General Assembly of the United Nations voted to approve the partition plan November 29, 1947 by a vote of 33 to 13, with 10 abstentions.
https://www.adl.org/resources/action-guide/united-nations-partition-plan-1947-un-resolution-181

And what Article 39 of U.N. Resolution 181 says;

The Security Council shall determine the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression and shall make recommendations, or decide what measures shall be taken in accordance with Articles 4 and 42, to maintain or restore international peace and security.
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/unchart.asp#art39

Both the U.S. Constitution, U.N. Resolution 181, the Bible and Torah have no intrinsic value or meaning. With the U.S. Constitution, it's preamble states;

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/about-educational-outreach/activity-resources/us

What does it mean that "We the people insure domestic tranquility and promote the general welfare?
I know, as "WE the people", we'll gather the signatures from enough different states to place an initiative like term limits on the federal ballot. Oops, only a politician can decide what "Americans" will vote for during a federal election.
I think both Russia (current) and Germany (1930 - 1945) shows what happens when a political party has too much power. Even when Rome as an empire fell set
a standard it seems that with the U.S. this century being involved with war in Iraq, Afghanistan, Ukraine/Russia and now Israel/Palestine.
And today the U.S. does not have domestic tranquility and instead of promoting the general welfare of Americans the U.S. promotes war. Peace is more profitable but it doesn't come with the power that war offers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_B90VnG6FR0