Relativity theory

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:
[quote]Swan wrote:Says the clown that actually denies that any climate exist on Earth.

Into the Night's stated position is that there are many climates all over earth.

Which climate in particular are you claiming that he is denying?

.

Actually all microclimates were denied, and since you claim that there are many climates you are now in agreement with me.

Define 'microclimate'. Buzzword fallacy. What makes any climate a 'microclimate'??

Swan wrote:
I would congratulate you but in order to keep yourself more confused than the Russian FSB you will change the topic once again so as said you can keep yourself off track.

130, now hand over the keys you dumb fart

Random phrases. Confusing and ignored.

Microclimate definition encyclopedia brittanica.

A microclimate is any climatic condition in a relatively small area, within a few metres or less above and below Earth's surface and within canopies of vegetation. The term usually applies to the surfaces of terrestrial and glaciated environments, but it could also pertain to the surfaces of oceans and other bodies of water.

The strongest gradients of temperature and humidity occur just above and below the terrestrial surface. Complexities of microclimate are necessary for the existence of a variety of life-forms because, although any single species may tolerate only a limited range of climate, strongly contrasting microclimates in close proximity provide a total environment in which many species of flora and fauna can coexist and interact.

Microclimatic conditions depend on such factors as temperature, humidity, wind and turbulence, dew, frost, heat balance, and evaporation. The effect of soil type on microclimates is considerable. Sandy soils and other coarse, loose, and dry soils, for example, are subject to high maximum and low minimum surface temperatures. The surface reflection characteristics of soils are also important; soils of lighter colour reflect more and respond less to daily heating (see also albedo). Another feature of the microclimate is the ability of the soil to absorb and retain moisture, which depends on the composition of the soil and its use. Vegetation is also integral, as it controls the flux of water vapour into the air through transpiration. In addition, vegetation can insulate the soil below and reduce temperature variability. Sites of exposed soil then exhibit the greatest temperature variability.

The only thing that you will never have is someone who loves you for who you are, because anyone who knows what a piece of shit that you truly are would have left you long ago, or already did.

CIAO

Encyclopedia Brittanica does not define any word. False authority fallacy.

Cutting and pasting only shows you can't think for yourself.
Climate has no area. There are no values associated with climate.
There is no such thing as 'flux of water vapor into the air'. Buzzword fallacy.
There is no term 'albedo' used in physics.
You were also giving examples that have no canopy. By using this definition, you are locking yourself in yet another paradox.

Try again. Define 'microclimate'.

No problem.

microclimate at dictionary.com

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/microclimate

No dictionary defines any word. Cutting and pasting isn't going to work, dude.

Swan wrote:
noun
the climate of a small area, as of confined spaces such as caves or houses (cryptoclimate ), of plant communities, wooded areas, etc. (phytoclimate ), or of urban communities, which may be different from that in the general region.

Swan wrote:
Bye the way do you have any good recipes for fresh chives as mine are ready in the garden.

All while you slave in the cubicle

LOL, unlike many people I like retarded trolls.

CIAO

Climate has no size.

Try again. Define 'microclimate'.

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/microclimate

microclimate
noun [ C ]
US /ˈmaɪ.kroʊˌklaɪ.mət/ UK /ˈmaɪ.krəʊˌklaɪ.mət/

an area in which the weather is usually different from the areas around it

microclimate
The state's myriad microclimates are also home to countless crops, some so specialized that certain chilies grow only in a single town.
From The Atlantic
To allow a year-round production and increase yield, mushrooms are grown in a microclimate inside growing rooms.
From Wired
Without adequate green space to help cool the atmosphere, highly populated urban areas essentially become their own overheated micro-climates.
From CBS News
They have the same microclimate; both very poor, both lots of older people living alone.
From NPR
In my experience, it takes a lot of resources to create a relatively small microclimate.
From CNN
The actual operation of the facility can destroy or modify habitats, and cause increased noise, electromagnetic field generation, microclimate alteration, pollution, water consumption, and fire.
From Slate Magazine
Sensors can do things like measure soil moisture and chemistry and track micro-climate conditions over time to help farmers decide what, where, and when to plant.
From Ars Technica
Trees may also increase water content in drylands by ameliorating microclimate and reducing soil evaporation113,114, or by hydraulic lift or redistribution115–117.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
The cooler, wetter microclimate in no-tillage fields also could have had a direct negative effect on immature pea leaf weevil, causing greater mortality.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
Interactions also occur via above-ground litter inputs and decomposition and foliage-induced changes in soil microclimate.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
The occasional, even reliably recurrent rain shower doth not a microclimate make.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
The altitudinal range depends on the region, but the outbreak zones tend to be lower at higher latitudes because microclimate (temperature regime) is similar.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
The urban water elements will also act as stormwater relief channels and contribute to the microclimate of the city.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
Changes in microclimate conditions of different cropping systems explain the variation of the yield components, and morphological and quality traits of cultivated sugarcane.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
This response can be explained by microclimate variations in the cropping systems, which was not sufficient to cause variation in sucrose content.

Silly girl

Pointing to others that use the same meaningless buzzword does not define the word, dude.
It is obvious that you are unable to define either 'microclimate' or 'macroclimate'.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:
[quote]Swan wrote:Says the clown that actually denies that any climate exist on Earth.

Into the Night's stated position is that there are many climates all over earth.

Which climate in particular are you claiming that he is denying?

.

Actually all microclimates were denied, and since you claim that there are many climates you are now in agreement with me.

Define 'microclimate'. Buzzword fallacy. What makes any climate a 'microclimate'??

Swan wrote:
I would congratulate you but in order to keep yourself more confused than the Russian FSB you will change the topic once again so as said you can keep yourself off track.

130, now hand over the keys you dumb fart

Random phrases. Confusing and ignored.

Microclimate definition encyclopedia brittanica.

A microclimate is any climatic condition in a relatively small area, within a few metres or less above and below Earth's surface and within canopies of vegetation. The term usually applies to the surfaces of terrestrial and glaciated environments, but it could also pertain to the surfaces of oceans and other bodies of water.

The strongest gradients of temperature and humidity occur just above and below the terrestrial surface. Complexities of microclimate are necessary for the existence of a variety of life-forms because, although any single species may tolerate only a limited range of climate, strongly contrasting microclimates in close proximity provide a total environment in which many species of flora and fauna can coexist and interact.

Microclimatic conditions depend on such factors as temperature, humidity, wind and turbulence, dew, frost, heat balance, and evaporation. The effect of soil type on microclimates is considerable. Sandy soils and other coarse, loose, and dry soils, for example, are subject to high maximum and low minimum surface temperatures. The surface reflection characteristics of soils are also important; soils of lighter colour reflect more and respond less to daily heating (see also albedo). Another feature of the microclimate is the ability of the soil to absorb and retain moisture, which depends on the composition of the soil and its use. Vegetation is also integral, as it controls the flux of water vapour into the air through transpiration. In addition, vegetation can insulate the soil below and reduce temperature variability. Sites of exposed soil then exhibit the greatest temperature variability.

The only thing that you will never have is someone who loves you for who you are, because anyone who knows what a piece of shit that you truly are would have left you long ago, or already did.

CIAO

Encyclopedia Brittanica does not define any word. False authority fallacy.

Cutting and pasting only shows you can't think for yourself.
Climate has no area. There are no values associated with climate.
There is no such thing as 'flux of water vapor into the air'. Buzzword fallacy.
There is no term 'albedo' used in physics.
You were also giving examples that have no canopy. By using this definition, you are locking yourself in yet another paradox.

Try again. Define 'microclimate'.

No problem.

microclimate at dictionary.com

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/microclimate

No dictionary defines any word. Cutting and pasting isn't going to work, dude.

Swan wrote:
noun
the climate of a small area, as of confined spaces such as caves or houses (cryptoclimate ), of plant communities, wooded areas, etc. (phytoclimate ), or of urban communities, which may be different from that in the general region.

Swan wrote:
Bye the way do you have any good recipes for fresh chives as mine are ready in the garden.

All while you slave in the cubicle

LOL, unlike many people I like retarded trolls.

CIAO

Climate has no size.

Try again. Define 'microclimate'.

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/microclimate

microclimate
noun [ C ]
US /ˈmaɪ.kroʊˌklaɪ.mət/ UK /ˈmaɪ.krəʊˌklaɪ.mət/

an area in which the weather is usually different from the areas around it

microclimate
The state's myriad microclimates are also home to countless crops, some so specialized that certain chilies grow only in a single town.
From The Atlantic
To allow a year-round production and increase yield, mushrooms are grown in a microclimate inside growing rooms.
From Wired
Without adequate green space to help cool the atmosphere, highly populated urban areas essentially become their own overheated micro-climates.
From CBS News
They have the same microclimate; both very poor, both lots of older people living alone.
From NPR
In my experience, it takes a lot of resources to create a relatively small microclimate.
From CNN
The actual operation of the facility can destroy or modify habitats, and cause increased noise, electromagnetic field generation, microclimate alteration, pollution, water consumption, and fire.
From Slate Magazine
Sensors can do things like measure soil moisture and chemistry and track micro-climate conditions over time to help farmers decide what, where, and when to plant.
From Ars Technica
Trees may also increase water content in drylands by ameliorating microclimate and reducing soil evaporation113,114, or by hydraulic lift or redistribution115–117.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
The cooler, wetter microclimate in no-tillage fields also could have had a direct negative effect on immature pea leaf weevil, causing greater mortality.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
Interactions also occur via above-ground litter inputs and decomposition and foliage-induced changes in soil microclimate.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
The occasional, even reliably recurrent rain shower doth not a microclimate make.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
The altitudinal range depends on the region, but the outbreak zones tend to be lower at higher latitudes because microclimate (temperature regime) is similar.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
The urban water elements will also act as stormwater relief channels and contribute to the microclimate of the city.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
Changes in microclimate conditions of different cropping systems explain the variation of the yield components, and morphological and quality traits of cultivated sugarcane.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
This response can be explained by microclimate variations in the cropping systems, which was not sufficient to cause variation in sucrose content.

Silly girl

Pointing to others that use the same meaningless buzzword does not define the word, dude.
It is obvious that you are unable to define either 'microclimate' or 'macroclimate'.

Who believes what you do? other than these guys that is

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:
[quote]Swan wrote:Says the clown that actually denies that any climate exist on Earth.

Into the Night's stated position is that there are many climates all over earth.

Which climate in particular are you claiming that he is denying?

.

Actually all microclimates were denied, and since you claim that there are many climates you are now in agreement with me.

Define 'microclimate'. Buzzword fallacy. What makes any climate a 'microclimate'??

Swan wrote:
I would congratulate you but in order to keep yourself more confused than the Russian FSB you will change the topic once again so as said you can keep yourself off track.

130, now hand over the keys you dumb fart

Random phrases. Confusing and ignored.

Microclimate definition encyclopedia brittanica.

A microclimate is any climatic condition in a relatively small area, within a few metres or less above and below Earth's surface and within canopies of vegetation. The term usually applies to the surfaces of terrestrial and glaciated environments, but it could also pertain to the surfaces of oceans and other bodies of water.

The strongest gradients of temperature and humidity occur just above and below the terrestrial surface. Complexities of microclimate are necessary for the existence of a variety of life-forms because, although any single species may tolerate only a limited range of climate, strongly contrasting microclimates in close proximity provide a total environment in which many species of flora and fauna can coexist and interact.

Microclimatic conditions depend on such factors as temperature, humidity, wind and turbulence, dew, frost, heat balance, and evaporation. The effect of soil type on microclimates is considerable. Sandy soils and other coarse, loose, and dry soils, for example, are subject to high maximum and low minimum surface temperatures. The surface reflection characteristics of soils are also important; soils of lighter colour reflect more and respond less to daily heating (see also albedo). Another feature of the microclimate is the ability of the soil to absorb and retain moisture, which depends on the composition of the soil and its use. Vegetation is also integral, as it controls the flux of water vapour into the air through transpiration. In addition, vegetation can insulate the soil below and reduce temperature variability. Sites of exposed soil then exhibit the greatest temperature variability.

The only thing that you will never have is someone who loves you for who you are, because anyone who knows what a piece of shit that you truly are would have left you long ago, or already did.

CIAO

Encyclopedia Brittanica does not define any word. False authority fallacy.

Cutting and pasting only shows you can't think for yourself.
Climate has no area. There are no values associated with climate.
There is no such thing as 'flux of water vapor into the air'. Buzzword fallacy.
There is no term 'albedo' used in physics.
You were also giving examples that have no canopy. By using this definition, you are locking yourself in yet another paradox.

Try again. Define 'microclimate'.

No problem.

microclimate at dictionary.com

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/microclimate

No dictionary defines any word. Cutting and pasting isn't going to work, dude.

Swan wrote:
noun
the climate of a small area, as of confined spaces such as caves or houses (cryptoclimate ), of plant communities, wooded areas, etc. (phytoclimate ), or of urban communities, which may be different from that in the general region.

Swan wrote:
Bye the way do you have any good recipes for fresh chives as mine are ready in the garden.

All while you slave in the cubicle

LOL, unlike many people I like retarded trolls.

CIAO

Climate has no size.

Try again. Define 'microclimate'.

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/microclimate

microclimate
noun [ C ]
US /ˈmaɪ.kroʊˌklaɪ.mət/ UK /ˈmaɪ.krəʊˌklaɪ.mət/

an area in which the weather is usually different from the areas around it

microclimate
The state's myriad microclimates are also home to countless crops, some so specialized that certain chilies grow only in a single town.
From The Atlantic
To allow a year-round production and increase yield, mushrooms are grown in a microclimate inside growing rooms.
From Wired
Without adequate green space to help cool the atmosphere, highly populated urban areas essentially become their own overheated micro-climates.
From CBS News
They have the same microclimate; both very poor, both lots of older people living alone.
From NPR
In my experience, it takes a lot of resources to create a relatively small microclimate.
From CNN
The actual operation of the facility can destroy or modify habitats, and cause increased noise, electromagnetic field generation, microclimate alteration, pollution, water consumption, and fire.
From Slate Magazine
Sensors can do things like measure soil moisture and chemistry and track micro-climate conditions over time to help farmers decide what, where, and when to plant.
From Ars Technica
Trees may also increase water content in drylands by ameliorating microclimate and reducing soil evaporation113,114, or by hydraulic lift or redistribution115–117.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
The cooler, wetter microclimate in no-tillage fields also could have had a direct negative effect on immature pea leaf weevil, causing greater mortality.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
Interactions also occur via above-ground litter inputs and decomposition and foliage-induced changes in soil microclimate.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
The occasional, even reliably recurrent rain shower doth not a microclimate make.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
The altitudinal range depends on the region, but the outbreak zones tend to be lower at higher latitudes because microclimate (temperature regime) is similar.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
The urban water elements will also act as stormwater relief channels and contribute to the microclimate of the city.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
Changes in microclimate conditions of different cropping systems explain the variation of the yield components, and morphological and quality traits of cultivated sugarcane.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
This response can be explained by microclimate variations in the cropping systems, which was not sufficient to cause variation in sucrose content.

Silly girl

Pointing to others that use the same meaningless buzzword does not define the word, dude.
It is obvious that you are unable to define either 'microclimate' or 'macroclimate'.

Who believes what you do? other than these guys that is

This is YOUR argument, dumbass...not mine. Pay attention.

Swan wrote:

LOL this is my daily dose of laughter, because like it or not, retards like you are actually fairly amusing.

James_ wrote:What these guys miss are that there are 3 basic climate types. Tropical, temperate and polar.

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:

LOL this is my daily dose of laughter, because like it or not, retards like you are actually fairly amusing.

It is funny when people attribute quotes to the wrong person. What these guys miss are that there are 3 basic climate types. Tropical, temperate and polar. These
3 climates are influenced by the height of the troposphere and the amount of solar radiation that they are exposed to.
After this land formations can change wind patterns which will affect rainfall. This can also influence regional temperatures. One example of this is the hole in the ozone layer over Antarctica increases the amount of spring warming on the southern African continent.
https://phys.org/news/2013-10-ozone-hole-responsible-southern-africa.html

And if that is correct then that is AGW because the hole in the ozone layer (diminished total column) is caused by hydrocarbons and halogens.

Swan wrote:

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:

LOL this is my daily dose of laughter, because like it or not, retards like you are actually fairly amusing.

It is funny when people attribute quotes to the wrong person. What these guys miss are that there are 3 basic climate types. Tropical, temperate and polar. These
3 climates are influenced by the height of the troposphere and the amount of solar radiation that they are exposed to.
After this land formations can change wind patterns which will affect rainfall. This can also influence regional temperatures. One example of this is the hole in the ozone layer over Antarctica increases the amount of spring warming on the southern African continent.
https://phys.org/news/2013-10-ozone-hole-responsible-southern-africa.html

And if that is correct then that is AGW because the hole in the ozone layer (diminished total column) is caused by hydrocarbons and halogens.

The really funny thing is that you believe that your lunatic ramblings have enough merit that they must be read?

No one cares

That said I do laugh

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

James_ wrote:

Swan wrote:

LOL this is my daily dose of laughter, because like it or not, retards like you are actually fairly amusing.

It is funny when people attribute quotes to the wrong person. What these guys miss are that there are 3 basic climate types. Tropical, temperate and polar. These
3 climates are influenced by the height of the troposphere and the amount of solar radiation that they are exposed to.
After this land formations can change wind patterns which will affect rainfall. This can also influence regional temperatures. One example of this is the hole in the ozone layer over Antarctica increases the amount of spring warming on the southern African continent.
https://phys.org/news/2013-10-ozone-hole-responsible-southern-africa.html

And if that is correct then that is AGW because the hole in the ozone layer (diminished total column) is caused by hydrocarbons and halogens.

The really funny thing is that you believe that your lunatic ramblings have enough merit that they must be read?

No one cares

That said I do laugh

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You SERIOUSLY believe that you can speak for EVERYONE?????????!? You're NOT GOD, dude!!!

PS The basic theories of physics take the form of physical laws expressed as differential equations such as Newton's 2nd law and law of gravitation, Euler's equations for fluid mechanics, Boltzmann's equations for gas dynamics, Maxwell's equations for electromagnetics, Schrödinger's equation for atom physics, and even Einstein's field equations. SR does not have this form, but is instead basically a coordinate transformation. There is no other theory of physics which has this form. Can a coordinate transformation contain any physics? Does a transformation from meter to yard bring in any physics?

PS1 Lorentz expressed his view on his transformation:

...a transformation of the time was necessary, so I introduced the conception of local time which is different for different frames of reference which are in motion relative to each other. But I never thought that this had anything to do with real time. This real time for me was still represented by the older classical notion of an absolute time, which is independent of any reference to special frames of coordinates. There existed for me only one true time. I considered my time transformation only as a heuristic working hypothesis, so the theory of relativity is really solely Einstein's work.

We read that Lorentz takes his hands off from Einstein's relativity theory based on misunderstanding Lorentz local time to be real time. Lorentz or Einstein?

What is so completely amazing is that Einstein's mistake of mixing space and time has become a religion for modern physicists. The twin paradox shows that this is confusing fake physics. No wonder that modern physics is in state of deep crisis, caused by Einstein in particular.

What then would be the effect of giving up SR? Nothing! It is illustrated by the fact that GPS system works because SR is not included, not because SR is included.

Now, the GPS system is a one-system based on the WGS84 spherical (ellipsoidal) coordinates system we are used to with latitude, longitude and height for spatial location, and an Earth based master clock setting common time, which is what your GPS receiver can report to you. The GPS system is thus a one-system and as such has no use for the special theory of relativity. In this one-system, the position of moving satellites are recorded by one master observer at rest on Earth and satellite clocks are synchronized with the master clock to UTC Universal Central Time (with nanosecond precision). There are no observers, sitting in the satellites making observations in moving inertial systems requiring coordination using the special theory of relativity. This is a one-master one-system for which the special theory of relativity has nothing to contribute.

This is yet another observation that GPS does not depend on the special theory of relativity.

Xadoman wrote: [erroneous and self-serving quote from Claes blog deleted]

Xadoman wrote: [erroneous and self-serving quote from Claes blog deleted]

Xadoman wrote: [erroneous and self-serving quote from Claes blog deleted]

Xadoman wrote: [erroneous and self-serving quote from Claes blog deleted]

IBdaMann wrote:

Xadoman wrote: [erroneous and self-serving quote from Claes blog deleted]

Xadoman wrote: [erroneous and self-serving quote from Claes blog deleted]

Xadoman wrote: [erroneous and self-serving quote from Claes blog deleted]

Xadoman wrote: [erroneous and self-serving quote from Claes blog deleted]

Xadoman, it does no good to quote others who are equally mistaken. You have been informed of what is required of you, i.e. provide one example whereby General Relativity does not hold. You are welcome to pull that example from claes blog, but you must provide it. Nothing less will do.

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Xadoman wrote: [erroneous and self-serving quote from Claes blog deleted]

Xadoman wrote: [erroneous and self-serving quote from Claes blog deleted]

Xadoman wrote: [erroneous and self-serving quote from Claes blog deleted]

Xadoman wrote: [erroneous and self-serving quote from Claes blog deleted]

Xadoman, it does no good to quote others who are equally mistaken. You have been informed of what is required of you, i.e. provide one example whereby General Relativity does not hold. You are welcome to pull that example from claes blog, but you must provide it. Nothing less will do.

Why are you deleting stuff?

Are you scared?

Swan wrote:Why are you deleting stuff? Are you scared?

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:Why are you deleting stuff? Are you scared?

I'm terrified.

Considering what I deleted, you really should be thanking me.

In fact, feel free to thank me.

Xadoman wrote:[irrelevant quote from Nikola Tesla deleted]

Xadoman wrote:
"Theory of relativity is a beggar wrapped in purple whom
ignorant people take for a king and a mass of error
and deceptive ideas violently opposed to the techniques
of great men of science of the past and even to common sense.

The theory wraps all these errors and fallacies and clothes
them in a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates,
dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors.
Its exponents are very brilliant men but they are
metaphysicists, rather than scientists. Not a single
one of the relativity propositions has been proved."

Nikola Tesla



IBdaMann , you fell for it but there is always time to turn around and come home.

IBdaMann wrote:

Xadoman wrote:[irrelevant quote from Nikola Tesla deleted]

Xadoman, your post was devoid of any General Relativity-falsifying example. You can't claim that General Relativity is somehow false without showing that it is false. No quote from any dead people suffices as falsification.

Swan wrote:General relativity does not explain the increasing speed of universal expansion

Swan wrote: as using the math

Swan wrote: ... one finds that 85 percent of the mass and energy is missing.

Swan wrote: That said relativity is a failure

Swan wrote: ... and everyone I speak for knows this

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:General relativity does not explain the increasing speed of universal expansion

General Relativity does not explain purple leprechauns, ninja cheese turtles, universal expansion acceleration, chupacabra, or a host of other things that have never been shown to exist.

Swan wrote: as using the math

Nope. There is no "The Math" that serves as a special branch of mathematics that somehow confirms what has otherwise never been shown to exist.

Swan wrote: ... one finds that 85 percent of the mass and energy is missing.

I need to discuss this with gfm7175. You are saying that the universe has only 15% of what it otherwise should have. I'm sure you were exhaustive in comparing our universe to other "control" universes which contain everything they should have. Climate Change surely is to blame.

Swan wrote: That said relativity is a failure

Science models don't do anything; they are simply models. They can't fail at anything because they don't do anything.

Swan wrote: ... and everyone I speak for knows this

You only speak for yourself, and you don't know this, you merely mistakenly believe it.

.

Swan wrote:This is actually very simple,...

Swan wrote:... because if the math in relativity is correct,

Swan wrote:... the universe cannot exist

Swan wrote: Which is why physicists are now claiming that the universe is not real but simulated.

Swan wrote: Which is why it is a theory as in not proven in any way.

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:This is actually very simple,...

... which means you're about to get it terribly wrong.

Swan wrote:... because if the math in relativity is correct,

Have you noticed that nobody has yet produced a single falsifying example?

Swan wrote:... the universe cannot exist

Thanks for playing. We have some nice consolation prizes for you on your way out.

Swan wrote: Which is why physicists are now claiming that the universe is not real but simulated.

The class of physicists is not claiming this.

Swan wrote: Which is why it is a theory as in not proven in any way.

No science model is ever proven or confirmed. You have said nothing.

General Relativity has passed the scrutiny of the scientific method, and nobody has yet provided a falsifying example, ergo we must accept General Relativity as true until such an example is produced.

.

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:This is actually very simple,...

... which means you're about to get it terribly wrong.

Swan wrote:... because if the math in relativity is correct,

Have you noticed that nobody has yet produced a single falsifying example?

Swan wrote:... the universe cannot exist

Thanks for playing. We have some nice consolation prizes for you on your way out.

Swan wrote: Which is why physicists are now claiming that the universe is not real but simulated.

The class of physicists is not claiming this.

Swan wrote: Which is why it is a theory as in not proven in any way.

No science model is ever proven or confirmed. You have said nothing.

General Relativity has passed the scrutiny of the scientific method, and nobody has yet provided a falsifying example, ergo we must accept General Relativity as true until such an example is produced.

.

Swan wrote:LOL, have you noticed that relativity is unproven

Swan wrote: and broken

Swan wrote:and as such remains nothing more than a theory, like bigfoot.

Xadoman wrote:Special relativity debunked.

Swan wrote:Relativity is unfinished, because the math does not add up.

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:LOL, have you noticed that relativity is unproven

Swan, I realize that you aren't that swift on the uptake so I'll reiterate that nothing in science is proved/confirmed. Science is science because, among other things, it has never been shown to be false. Watch:

Swan, have no noticed how nobody has ever shown General Relativity to be false?

Now, before you kneejerk your fully anticipatable errors, yes, this can certainly be said of any religion. The difference between religion and science is that religion is wholly unfalsifiable whereas science is wholly falsifiable ... yet never falsified.

Swan wrote: and broken

Nope. That would incorrectly imply that someone has somehow shown it to be false. No one has ever shown General Relativity to be false. General Relativity is clearly not broken.

Swan wrote:and as such remains nothing more than a theory, like bigfoot.

Incorrect. Engineers use General Relativity, not Newton's laws, for navigation of space vehicles because General Relativity is what seems to work every time (across differing inertial frames of reference). GPS is an actual system, not a mere urban legend, and is based on General Relativity; it appears to work correctly.

Swan wrote:Actually according to relativity, the farthest points of the universe cannot be traveling at 5 times light speed as they are,

Xadoman wrote:
"Theory of relativity is a beggar wrapped in purple whom
ignorant people take for a king and a mass of error
and deceptive ideas violently opposed to the techniques
of great men of science of the past and even to common sense.

The theory wraps all these errors and fallacies and clothes
them in a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates,
dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors.
Its exponents are very brilliant men but they are
metaphysicists, rather than scientists. Not a single
one of the relativity propositions has been proved."

Nikola Tesla

It is not possible to prove any theory True. You have not falsified any theory.

IBdaMann , you fell for it but there is always time to turn around and come home.

Swan wrote:

Xadoman wrote:
"Theory of relativity is a beggar wrapped in purple whom
ignorant people take for a king and a mass of error
and deceptive ideas violently opposed to the techniques
of great men of science of the past and even to common sense.

The theory wraps all these errors and fallacies and clothes
them in a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates,
dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors.
Its exponents are very brilliant men but they are
metaphysicists, rather than scientists. Not a single
one of the relativity propositions has been proved."

Nikola Tesla



IBdaMann , you fell for it but there is always time to turn around and come home.

LOL Tesla the buffoon who was going to take over the world by beaming electricity. Well that was a total failure

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Xadoman wrote:[irrelevant quote from Nikola Tesla deleted]

Xadoman, your post was devoid of any General Relativity-falsifying example. You can't claim that General Relativity is somehow false without showing that it is false. No quote from any dead people suffices as falsification.

General relativity does not explain the increasing speed of universal expansion as using the math one finds that 85 percent of the mass and energy is missing. That said relativity is a failure and everyone knows this, so now people are saying that the universe is simulated

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:This is actually very simple,...

... which means you're about to get it terribly wrong.

Swan wrote:... because if the math in relativity is correct,

Have you noticed that nobody has yet produced a single falsifying example?

Swan wrote:... the universe cannot exist

Thanks for playing. We have some nice consolation prizes for you on your way out.

Swan wrote: Which is why physicists are now claiming that the universe is not real but simulated.

The class of physicists is not claiming this.

Swan wrote: Which is why it is a theory as in not proven in any way.

No science model is ever proven or confirmed. You have said nothing.

General Relativity has passed the scrutiny of the scientific method, and nobody has yet provided a falsifying example, ergo we must accept General Relativity as true until such an example is produced.

.

LOL, have you noticed that relativity is unproven and broken and as such remains nothing more than a theory, like bigfoot.

Xadoman wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LKx_j_3Zm68&t=76s&ab_channel=ItsBS

Special relativity debunked.

In short - twin( or clock) paradox debunks special relativity. According to special relativity, both twins should age slower relative to another because from the point of relativity you can assume both twins to be at rest. Twin on earth at rest and twin with the spaceship moving or twin at spaceship at rest and twin with earth moving.

Swan wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:This is actually very simple,...

... which means you're about to get it terribly wrong.

Swan wrote:... because if the math in relativity is correct,

Have you noticed that nobody has yet produced a single falsifying example?

Swan wrote:... the universe cannot exist

Thanks for playing. We have some nice consolation prizes for you on your way out.

Swan wrote: Which is why physicists are now claiming that the universe is not real but simulated.

The class of physicists is not claiming this.

Swan wrote: Which is why it is a theory as in not proven in any way.

No science model is ever proven or confirmed. You have said nothing.

General Relativity has passed the scrutiny of the scientific method, and nobody has yet provided a falsifying example, ergo we must accept General Relativity as true until such an example is produced.

.

Relativity is unfinished, because the math does not add up. When your math does not add up on an exam, you fail the exam or at least that question, no one tells you how great you are for having flawed math

IBdaMann wrote:

Swan wrote:LOL, have you noticed that relativity is unproven

Swan, I realize that you aren't that swift on the uptake so I'll reiterate that nothing in science is proved/confirmed. Science is science because, among other things, it has never been shown to be false. Watch:

Swan, have no noticed how nobody has ever shown General Relativity to be false?

Now, before you kneejerk your fully anticipatable errors, yes, this can certainly be said of any religion. The difference between religion and science is that religion is wholly unfalsifiable whereas science is wholly falsifiable ... yet never falsified.

Swan wrote: and broken

Nope. That would incorrectly imply that someone has somehow shown it to be false. No one has ever shown General Relativity to be false. General Relativity is clearly not broken.

Swan wrote:and as such remains nothing more than a theory, like bigfoot.

Incorrect. Engineers use General Relativity, not Newton's laws, for navigation of space vehicles because General Relativity is what seems to work every time (across differing inertial frames of reference). GPS is an actual system, not a mere urban legend, and is based on General Relativity; it appears to work correctly.

Into the Night wrote:Engineers use Newton's law of motion, Newton's law of gravitation, Kepler's laws, and Einstein's General Relativity law when navigating in space.

Into the Night wrote: GPS is based on Kepler's laws, Newton's laws, and Einstein's laws.