Remember me
▼ Content

Ding Dong the Witch is dead. That said queen elizabeth lived long enough to kill Princess Diana first



Page 7 of 7<<<567
02-10-2022 21:30
SwanProfile picture★★★★★
(2785)
Into the Night wrote:
Swan wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Swan wrote:Actually, linguistics applies to both spoken and written words.

Nope. "Linguistic" refers to the oral/spoken with the tongue, hence the prefix "lingui" (tongue).

You referred specifically to his text response which required "rhetorically" or possibly "lexically" which refers to words.


Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff. I'm here through Thursday.


Actually, linguistics is the scientific study

Science isn't linguistics. There is no branch of science called 'linguistics'. There are no theories of science on that subject at all.
Swan wrote:
of the physical, structural, functional, psychological, and social characteristics of human language, both spoken and written.
...deleted Mantras 7...5...1d...

Languages is not a physical thing. There is no such thing as a 'psychological' language. There is no such thing as a 'social characteristic' language.

Of course, this is no surprise you make this kind of idiocy because you don't know English, but claim you do.

Semantics fallacy.


What is Linguistics?
Linguistics is the scientific study of language, and its focus is the systematic investigation of the properties of particular languages as well as the characteristics of language in general. It encompasses not only the study of sound, grammar and meaning, but also the history of language families, how languages are acquired by children and adults, and how language use is processed in the mind and how it is connected to race and gender. With close connections to the humanities, social sciences and the natural sciences, linguistics complements a diverse range of other disciplines such as anthropology, philosophy, psychology, sociology, biology, computer science, health sciences, education and literature. The subfield of Applied Linguistics emphasizes the use of linguistic concepts in the classroom to help students improve their ability to communicate in their native language or a second language.

Important subfields of linguistics include:

Phonetics - the study of how speech sounds are produced and perceived
Phonology - the study of sound patterns and changes
Morphology - the study of word structure
Syntax - the study of sentence structure
Semantics - the study of linguistic meaning
Pragmatics - the study of how language is used in context
Historical Linguistics - the study of language change
Sociolinguistics - the study of the relation between language and society
Computational Linguistics - the study of how computers can process human language
Psycholinguistics - the study of how humans acquire and use language

You may now quote each point as though any living human actually gives a krap about your babbles.

Silly girl


According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are

This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop

I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.

ULTRA MAGA

Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
03-10-2022 05:50
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(19854)
Robert Wagner wrote:
Into the Night wrote:

Science isn't linguistics. There is no branch of science called 'linguistics'. There are no theories of science on that subject at all.

...deleted Mantras 16b...5...1a...17...

No argument presented. Trolling.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
03-10-2022 06:05
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(19854)
Swan wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Swan wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Swan wrote:Actually, linguistics applies to both spoken and written words.

Nope. "Linguistic" refers to the oral/spoken with the tongue, hence the prefix "lingui" (tongue).

You referred specifically to his text response which required "rhetorically" or possibly "lexically" which refers to words.


Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff. I'm here through Thursday.


Actually, linguistics is the scientific study

Science isn't linguistics. There is no branch of science called 'linguistics'. There are no theories of science on that subject at all.
Swan wrote:
of the physical, structural, functional, psychological, and social characteristics of human language, both spoken and written.
...deleted Mantras 7...5...1d...

Languages is not a physical thing. There is no such thing as a 'psychological' language. There is no such thing as a 'social characteristic' language.

Of course, this is no surprise you make this kind of idiocy because you don't know English, but claim you do.

Semantics fallacy.


What is Linguistics?
Linguistics is the scientific study of language,

Not a branch of science. Science is not language. Science is a set of falsifiable theories.
Swan wrote:
and its focus is the systematic investigation of the properties of particular languages as well as the characteristics of language in general.

Nope. It means a study of spoken language. Too bad you don't know English or Latin.
Swan wrote:
It encompasses not only the study of sound, grammar and meaning, but also the history of language families, how languages are acquired by children and adults, and how language use is processed in the mind and how it is connected to race and gender. With close connections to the humanities, social sciences and the natural sciences, linguistics complements a diverse range of other disciplines such as anthropology, philosophy, psychology, sociology, biology, computer science, health sciences, education and literature. The subfield of Applied Linguistics emphasizes the use of linguistic concepts in the classroom to help students improve their ability to communicate in their native language or a second language.

No, it doesn't. You are making shit up again.
Swan wrote:
Important subfields of linguistics include:

There are no subfields.
Swan wrote:
Phonetics - the study of how speech sounds are produced and perceived

That is linquistics.
Swan wrote:
Phonology - the study of sound patterns and changes

No such study. Buzzword fallacy.
Swan wrote:
Morphology - the study of word structure

No such study. Buzzword fallacy.
Swan wrote:
Syntax - the study of sentence structure

That's called grammar.
Swan wrote:
Semantics - the study of linguistic meaning

Nope. Just meaning.
Swan wrote:
Pragmatics - the study of how language is used in context

No such study. Buzzword fallacy.
Swan wrote:
Historical Linguistics - the study of language change

That's called 'history'.
Swan wrote:
Sociolinguistics - the study of the relation between language and society

Nope. That's call sociology.
Swan wrote:
Computational Linguistics - the study of how computers can process human language

Nope. That's called voice recognition.
Swan wrote:
Psycholinguistics - the study of how humans acquire and use language

That's called neurology.
...deleted Mantras 5...1a...
[/quote]
Semantics fallacies. Redefinition fallacies.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
03-10-2022 08:46
Robert Wagner
★☆☆☆☆
(58)
Into the Night wrote:
Robert Wagner wrote:
Into the Night wrote:

Science isn't linguistics. There is no branch of science called 'linguistics'. There are no theories of science on that subject at all.

...deleted Mantras 16b...5...1a...17...

No argument presented. Trolling.


Still can't quote right, troll.
03-10-2022 14:57
SwanProfile picture★★★★★
(2785)
Into the Night wrote:
Swan wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Swan wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Swan wrote:Actually, linguistics applies to both spoken and written words.

Nope. "Linguistic" refers to the oral/spoken with the tongue, hence the prefix "lingui" (tongue).

You referred specifically to his text response which required "rhetorically" or possibly "lexically" which refers to words.


Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff. I'm here through Thursday.


Actually, linguistics is the scientific study

Science isn't linguistics. There is no branch of science called 'linguistics'. There are no theories of science on that subject at all.
Swan wrote:
of the physical, structural, functional, psychological, and social characteristics of human language, both spoken and written.
...deleted Mantras 7...5...1d...

Languages is not a physical thing. There is no such thing as a 'psychological' language. There is no such thing as a 'social characteristic' language.

Of course, this is no surprise you make this kind of idiocy because you don't know English, but claim you do.

Semantics fallacy.


What is Linguistics?
Linguistics is the scientific study of language,

Not a branch of science. Science is not language. Science is a set of falsifiable theories.
Swan wrote:
and its focus is the systematic investigation of the properties of particular languages as well as the characteristics of language in general.

Nope. It means a study of spoken language. Too bad you don't know English or Latin.
Swan wrote:
It encompasses not only the study of sound, grammar and meaning, but also the history of language families, how languages are acquired by children and adults, and how language use is processed in the mind and how it is connected to race and gender. With close connections to the humanities, social sciences and the natural sciences, linguistics complements a diverse range of other disciplines such as anthropology, philosophy, psychology, sociology, biology, computer science, health sciences, education and literature. The subfield of Applied Linguistics emphasizes the use of linguistic concepts in the classroom to help students improve their ability to communicate in their native language or a second language.

No, it doesn't. You are making shit up again.
Swan wrote:
Important subfields of linguistics include:

There are no subfields.
Swan wrote:
Phonetics - the study of how speech sounds are produced and perceived

That is linquistics.
Swan wrote:
Phonology - the study of sound patterns and changes

No such study. Buzzword fallacy.
Swan wrote:
Morphology - the study of word structure

No such study. Buzzword fallacy.
Swan wrote:
Syntax - the study of sentence structure

That's called grammar.
Swan wrote:
Semantics - the study of linguistic meaning

Nope. Just meaning.
Swan wrote:
Pragmatics - the study of how language is used in context

No such study. Buzzword fallacy.
Swan wrote:
Historical Linguistics - the study of language change

That's called 'history'.
Swan wrote:
Sociolinguistics - the study of the relation between language and society

Nope. That's call sociology.
Swan wrote:
Computational Linguistics - the study of how computers can process human language

Nope. That's called voice recognition.
Swan wrote:
Psycholinguistics - the study of how humans acquire and use language

That's called neurology.
...deleted Mantras 5...1a...

Semantics fallacies. Redefinition fallacies.[/quote]

Linguistics at UCLA

What is Linguistics?
Linguistics is the scientific study of language. Linguists (experts in linguistics) work on specific languages, but their primary goal is to understand the nature of language in general by asking questions such as:

What distinguishes human language from other animal communication systems?
What features are common to all human languages?
How are the modes of linguistic communication (speech, writing, sign language) related to each other?
How is language related to other types of human behavior?
The main goal of linguistics, like all other intellectual disciplines, is to increase our knowledge and understanding of the world. Since language is universal and fundamental to all human interactions, the knowledge attained in linguistics has many practical applications. Linguists, with some training in other appropriate disciplines, are thus prepared to seek answers to questions such as:

How can a previously unstudied language be analyzed and written?
How can foreign languages best be taught and learned?
How can speech be synthesized on a computer or how can a computer be programmed to understand human speech?
How can the language problems of people with speech abnormalities be analyzed and rectified?
How are linguistic issues in legal matters to be handled?


The Sub-Fields of Linguistics
Language is a phenomenon with many layers, from the sounds that speakers produce to the meanings that those sounds express. The field of Linguistics is comprised of several sub-fields. Most professional linguists become specialists in one or more of these sub-fields. The major ones are:

Phonetics
The study of speech sounds. Phoneticians study both the production of speech sounds by the human speech organs (articulatory phonetics) and the properties of the sounds themselves (acoustic phonetics). Phoneticians are concerned with such questions as:

What are the sounds, from among all those that humans could make, that actually exist in the world's languages?
What specially defines different "accents"?
Can speakers be identified by "voiceprints"?
What are the properties of sounds that would apply in computerized speech synthesis?
Phonology
The study of language sound systems. Phonologists are concerned with questions such as:

What sounds contrast in one language but not another (answers to such questions explain why Spanish speakers have trouble with the difference between English sh and ch, or why English speakers have trouble with the different "u" sounds in French words like rue 'street' and roue 'wheel'.)?
What sounds of a language can or cannot occur one after the other (for example, why can words begin in st– in English but not in Spanish)?
How do poets or writers or song lyrics intuitively know how to match the rhythm of speech to the abstract rhythmic pattern of a poetic or musical meter?
Morphology
The study of word structure. Morphologists examine such questions as:

To what extent are ways of forming words "productive" or not (e.g. why do English speakers say arrival and amusement but not *arrivement and *amusal)?
What determines when words change form (for example, why does English have to add –er to adjectives when making comparisons, but Hebrew does not add any equivalent)?
How can humans program computers to recognize the "root" of a word separated from its "affixes" (e.g. how could a computer recognize walk, walks, walking, and walked as the "same" word)?
Syntax
The study of how linguistic units larger than the word are constructed. Syntacticians address such questions as:

How can the number of sentences that speakers can create be infinite in number even though the number of words in any language is finite?
What makes a sentence like visiting relatives can be boring ambiguous?
Why would English speakers judge a sentence like colorless green ideas sleep furiously to be "grammatical" even though it is nonsensical?
How can languages express the same thoughts even though they construct their sentences in different ways (e.g. Why does English I saw them there mean the same thing as French je les y ai vus even though the order of elements in French is I them there have seen)?
How can humans program a computer to analyze the structure of sentences?
Semantics
The study of meaning. Semanticists answer such questions as:

How do speakers know what words mean (e.g. How does one know where red stops and orange starts)?
What is the basis of metaphors (e.g. Why is my car is a lemon a "good" metaphor but my car is a cabbage is not)?
What makes sentences like I'm looking for a tall student or the student I am looking for must be tall have more than one meaning?
In a sentence like I regret that he lied, how do we know that, in fact, he did lie?
How many meanings can be found in a sentence like three students read three books and why do just those meanings exist?
In addition to these sub-fields, there are a number of other sub-fields that cross-cut them:

Historical linguistics
The study of how languages change over time, addressing such questions as why modern English is different form Old English and Middle English or what it means to say that English and German are "more closely related" to each other than English and French.

Sociolinguistics
The study of how language is used in society, addressing such questions as what makes some dialects more "prestigious" than others, where slang comes from and why it arises, or what happens when two languages come together in "bilingual" communities.

Psycholinguistics
The study of how language is processed in the mind, addressing such questions as how we can hear a string of language noises and make sense of them, how children can learn to speak and understand the language of their environment as quickly and effortlessly as they do, or how people with pathological language problems differ from people who have "normal" language.

Neurolinguistics
The study of the actual encoding of language in the brain, addressing such questions as what parts of the brain different aspects of language are stored in, how language is actually stored, what goes on physically in the brain when language is processed, or how the brain compensates when certain areas are damaged.

Computational linguistics
Learning and understanding a language involves computing the properties of that language that are described in its phonology, syntax, and semantics. The challenge of describing this process connects linguistics with computational issues at a very fundamental level. How could syntactic structures be computed from spoken language, how are semantic relations recognized, and how could these computational skills be acquired?


According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are

This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop

I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.

ULTRA MAGA

Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
03-10-2022 18:17
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(19854)
Robert Wagner wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Robert Wagner wrote:
Into the Night wrote:

Science isn't linguistics. There is no branch of science called 'linguistics'. There are no theories of science on that subject at all.

...deleted Mantras 16b...5...1a...17...

No argument presented. Trolling.

...deleted Mantras 10j...1a...

No argument presented. Trolling.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
03-10-2022 18:20
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(19854)
Swan wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Swan wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Swan wrote:
[quote]IBdaMann wrote:
[quote]Swan wrote:Actually, linguistics applies to both spoken and written words.

Nope. "Linguistic" refers to the oral/spoken with the tongue, hence the prefix "lingui" (tongue).

You referred specifically to his text response which required "rhetorically" or possibly "lexically" which refers to words.


Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff. I'm here through Thursday.


Actually, linguistics is the scientific study

Science isn't linguistics. There is no branch of science called 'linguistics'. There are no theories of science on that subject at all.
Swan wrote:
of the physical, structural, functional, psychological, and social characteristics of human language, both spoken and written.
...deleted Mantras 7...5...1d...

Languages is not a physical thing. There is no such thing as a 'psychological' language. There is no such thing as a 'social characteristic' language.

Of course, this is no surprise you make this kind of idiocy because you don't know English, but claim you do.

Semantics fallacy.

...deleted repetition...

No argument presented. Spamming. Trolling.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
03-10-2022 22:04
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(13031)
Swan wrote:Linguistics at UCLA

Well, you sure know how to obliterate any credibility you might have had.

UCLA? You might as well have cited "Linguistics at CNN."
03-10-2022 23:38
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(19854)
IBdaMann wrote:
Swan wrote:Linguistics at UCLA

Well, you sure know how to obliterate any credibility you might have had.

UCLA? You might as well have cited "Linguistics at CNN."

Nice comparison!



The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
04-10-2022 00:53
SwanProfile picture★★★★★
(2785)
IBdaMann wrote:
Swan wrote:Linguistics at UCLA

Well, you sure know how to obliterate any credibility you might have had.

UCLA? You might as well have cited "Linguistics at CNN."


Says the mental patient who denies the existence of both the last ice age and the holocaust.

You may continue stroking your chicken


According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are

This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop

I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.

ULTRA MAGA

Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
04-10-2022 14:07
SwanProfile picture★★★★★
(2785)
IBdaMann wrote:
Swan wrote:Linguistics at UCLA

Well, you sure know how to obliterate any credibility you might have had.

UCLA? You might as well have cited "Linguistics at CNN."


So basically, what you are saying is that CNN is BS and FOX news is real. Well FOX reported at least 100,000 times that Hillary Cliton was going to jail. Did she? and why did FOX claim that she was going to jail? The answer is that FOX feeds people's delusions just like CNN does and that there is only one truth and no American news source will ever report it. Not that programmed zombies like you can ever really see the communist truth, called America and the American media.


According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are

This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop

I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.

ULTRA MAGA

Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
04-10-2022 15:52
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(13031)
Swan wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Swan wrote:Linguistics at UCLA
Well, you sure know how to obliterate any credibility you might have had.

UCLA? You might as well have cited "Linguistics at CNN."
So basically, what you are saying is that CNN is BS and FOX news is real.

Your reading comprehension seems to be improving. You only got it mostly wrong.

We don't have any news anymore. We only have thought controlling institutions that want to do my thinking for me. They do not provide me with empirical information and let me perform my own critical reasoning. Instead, they merely hand me the conclusions I am to reach and the beliefs that I am to hold. Fox news was one of the last to become BS, yes, but BS they have become.

I have to be my own investigative reporter. I have to be my own news channel.

Swan wrote: Not that programmed zombies like you can ever really see the communist truth, called America and the American media.

Thank you, Swan. I'll have you know that you are my trusted news source when it comes to your tomatoes and eggplants, ... and the status of the FBI snubbing you.

Rock on.
04-10-2022 18:36
SwanProfile picture★★★★★
(2785)
IBdaMann wrote:
Swan wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
Swan wrote:Linguistics at UCLA
Well, you sure know how to obliterate any credibility you might have had.

UCLA? You might as well have cited "Linguistics at CNN."
So basically, what you are saying is that CNN is BS and FOX news is real.

Your reading comprehension seems to be improving. You only got it mostly wrong.

We don't have any news anymore. We only have thought controlling institutions that want to do my thinking for me. They do not provide me with empirical information and let me perform my own critical reasoning. Instead, they merely hand me the conclusions I am to reach and the beliefs that I am to hold. Fox news was one of the last to become BS, yes, but BS they have become.

I have to be my own investigative reporter. I have to be my own news channel.

Swan wrote: Not that programmed zombies like you can ever really see the communist truth, called America and the American media.

Thank you, Swan. I'll have you know that you are my trusted news source when it comes to your tomatoes and eggplants, ... and the status of the FBI snubbing you.

Rock on.


Says the idiot who denies the last ice age and the holocaust both.

Face it, no one cares about your programmed nonsense


According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are

This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop

I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND.

ULTRA MAGA

Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
Page 7 of 7<<<567





Join the debate Ding Dong the Witch is dead. That said queen elizabeth lived long enough to kill Princess Diana first:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Idiot who followed computer GPS instructions dead after driving off collapsed bridge.009-10-2022 01:21
Ding Dong the skanky old queen is dead, party at every Irish pub on Earth011-09-2022 19:06
Lizard Liz is dead, London bridge has fallen. Diner in Scotland celebrates with Champagne010-09-2022 14:33
Aesop's Fables - The Troll Who Cried Dead Barrier Reef804-09-2022 00:00
5 Covid 19 vaccinated children dead of liver disease9127-05-2022 23:18
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact