Ding Dong the Witch is dead. That said queen elizabeth lived long enough to kill Princess Diana first

Climate-Debate.com > Discussion Forum > Climate debate in general > Ding Dong the Witch is dead. That said queen elizabeth lived long enough to kill Princess Diana first > Page 7

Page 7 of 7

02-10-2022 21:30
Swan★★★★★ (5723)	Into the Night wrote: Swan wrote: IBdaMann wrote: Swan wrote:Actually, linguistics applies to both spoken and written words. Nope. "Linguistic" refers to the oral/spoken with the tongue, hence the prefix "lingui" (tongue). You referred specifically to his text response which required "rhetorically" or possibly "lexically" which refers to words. Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff. I'm here through Thursday. Actually, linguistics is the scientific study Science isn't linguistics. There is no branch of science called 'linguistics'. There are no theories of science on that subject at all. Swan wrote: of the physical, structural, functional, psychological, and social characteristics of human language, both spoken and written. ...deleted Mantras 7...5...1d... Languages is not a physical thing. There is no such thing as a 'psychological' language. There is no such thing as a 'social characteristic' language. Of course, this is no surprise you make this kind of idiocy because you don't know English, but claim you do. Semantics fallacy. What is Linguistics? Linguistics is the scientific study of language, and its focus is the systematic investigation of the properties of particular languages as well as the characteristics of language in general. It encompasses not only the study of sound, grammar and meaning, but also the history of language families, how languages are acquired by children and adults, and how language use is processed in the mind and how it is connected to race and gender. With close connections to the humanities, social sciences and the natural sciences, linguistics complements a diverse range of other disciplines such as anthropology, philosophy, psychology, sociology, biology, computer science, health sciences, education and literature. The subfield of Applied Linguistics emphasizes the use of linguistic concepts in the classroom to help students improve their ability to communicate in their native language or a second language. Important subfields of linguistics include: Phonetics - the study of how speech sounds are produced and perceived Phonology - the study of sound patterns and changes Morphology - the study of word structure Syntax - the study of sentence structure Semantics - the study of linguistic meaning Pragmatics - the study of how language is used in context Historical Linguistics - the study of language change Sociolinguistics - the study of the relation between language and society Computational Linguistics - the study of how computers can process human language Psycholinguistics - the study of how humans acquire and use language You may now quote each point as though any living human actually gives a krap about your babbles. Silly girl IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD. According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND. ULTRA MAGA "Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic? It's time to dig up Joseph Mccarthey and show him TikTok, then duck. Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
03-10-2022 05:50
Into the Night★★★★★ (21600)	Robert Wagner wrote: Into the Night wrote: Science isn't linguistics. There is no branch of science called 'linguistics'. There are no theories of science on that subject at all. ...deleted Mantras 16b...5...1a...17... No argument presented. Trolling. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
03-10-2022 06:05
Into the Night★★★★★ (21600)	Swan wrote: Into the Night wrote: Swan wrote: IBdaMann wrote: Swan wrote:Actually, linguistics applies to both spoken and written words. Nope. "Linguistic" refers to the oral/spoken with the tongue, hence the prefix "lingui" (tongue). You referred specifically to his text response which required "rhetorically" or possibly "lexically" which refers to words. Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff. I'm here through Thursday. Actually, linguistics is the scientific study Science isn't linguistics. There is no branch of science called 'linguistics'. There are no theories of science on that subject at all. Swan wrote: of the physical, structural, functional, psychological, and social characteristics of human language, both spoken and written. ...deleted Mantras 7...5...1d... Languages is not a physical thing. There is no such thing as a 'psychological' language. There is no such thing as a 'social characteristic' language. Of course, this is no surprise you make this kind of idiocy because you don't know English, but claim you do. Semantics fallacy. What is Linguistics? Linguistics is the scientific study of language, Not a branch of science. Science is not language. Science is a set of falsifiable theories. Swan wrote: and its focus is the systematic investigation of the properties of particular languages as well as the characteristics of language in general. Nope. It means a study of spoken language. Too bad you don't know English or Latin. Swan wrote: It encompasses not only the study of sound, grammar and meaning, but also the history of language families, how languages are acquired by children and adults, and how language use is processed in the mind and how it is connected to race and gender. With close connections to the humanities, social sciences and the natural sciences, linguistics complements a diverse range of other disciplines such as anthropology, philosophy, psychology, sociology, biology, computer science, health sciences, education and literature. The subfield of Applied Linguistics emphasizes the use of linguistic concepts in the classroom to help students improve their ability to communicate in their native language or a second language. No, it doesn't. You are making shit up again. Swan wrote: Important subfields of linguistics include: There are no subfields. Swan wrote: Phonetics - the study of how speech sounds are produced and perceived That is linquistics. Swan wrote: Phonology - the study of sound patterns and changes No such study. Buzzword fallacy. Swan wrote: Morphology - the study of word structure No such study. Buzzword fallacy. Swan wrote: Syntax - the study of sentence structure That's called grammar. Swan wrote: Semantics - the study of linguistic meaning Nope. Just meaning. Swan wrote: Pragmatics - the study of how language is used in context No such study. Buzzword fallacy. Swan wrote: Historical Linguistics - the study of language change That's called 'history'. Swan wrote: Sociolinguistics - the study of the relation between language and society Nope. That's call sociology. Swan wrote: Computational Linguistics - the study of how computers can process human language Nope. That's called voice recognition. Swan wrote: Psycholinguistics - the study of how humans acquire and use language That's called neurology. ...deleted Mantras 5...1a... [/quote] Semantics fallacies. Redefinition fallacies. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
03-10-2022 08:46
Robert Wagner ★☆☆☆☆ (68)	Into the Night wrote: Robert Wagner wrote: Into the Night wrote: Science isn't linguistics. There is no branch of science called 'linguistics'. There are no theories of science on that subject at all. ...deleted Mantras 16b...5...1a...17... No argument presented. Trolling. Still can't quote right, troll.
03-10-2022 14:57
Swan★★★★★ (5723)	Into the Night wrote: Swan wrote: Into the Night wrote: Swan wrote: IBdaMann wrote: Swan wrote:Actually, linguistics applies to both spoken and written words. Nope. "Linguistic" refers to the oral/spoken with the tongue, hence the prefix "lingui" (tongue). You referred specifically to his text response which required "rhetorically" or possibly "lexically" which refers to words. Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff. I'm here through Thursday. Actually, linguistics is the scientific study Science isn't linguistics. There is no branch of science called 'linguistics'. There are no theories of science on that subject at all. Swan wrote: of the physical, structural, functional, psychological, and social characteristics of human language, both spoken and written. ...deleted Mantras 7...5...1d... Languages is not a physical thing. There is no such thing as a 'psychological' language. There is no such thing as a 'social characteristic' language. Of course, this is no surprise you make this kind of idiocy because you don't know English, but claim you do. Semantics fallacy. What is Linguistics? Linguistics is the scientific study of language, Not a branch of science. Science is not language. Science is a set of falsifiable theories. Swan wrote: and its focus is the systematic investigation of the properties of particular languages as well as the characteristics of language in general. Nope. It means a study of spoken language. Too bad you don't know English or Latin. Swan wrote: It encompasses not only the study of sound, grammar and meaning, but also the history of language families, how languages are acquired by children and adults, and how language use is processed in the mind and how it is connected to race and gender. With close connections to the humanities, social sciences and the natural sciences, linguistics complements a diverse range of other disciplines such as anthropology, philosophy, psychology, sociology, biology, computer science, health sciences, education and literature. The subfield of Applied Linguistics emphasizes the use of linguistic concepts in the classroom to help students improve their ability to communicate in their native language or a second language. No, it doesn't. You are making shit up again. Swan wrote: Important subfields of linguistics include: There are no subfields. Swan wrote: Phonetics - the study of how speech sounds are produced and perceived That is linquistics. Swan wrote: Phonology - the study of sound patterns and changes No such study. Buzzword fallacy. Swan wrote: Morphology - the study of word structure No such study. Buzzword fallacy. Swan wrote: Syntax - the study of sentence structure That's called grammar. Swan wrote: Semantics - the study of linguistic meaning Nope. Just meaning. Swan wrote: Pragmatics - the study of how language is used in context No such study. Buzzword fallacy. Swan wrote: Historical Linguistics - the study of language change That's called 'history'. Swan wrote: Sociolinguistics - the study of the relation between language and society Nope. That's call sociology. Swan wrote: Computational Linguistics - the study of how computers can process human language Nope. That's called voice recognition. Swan wrote: Psycholinguistics - the study of how humans acquire and use language That's called neurology. ...deleted Mantras 5...1a... Semantics fallacies. Redefinition fallacies.[/quote] Linguistics at UCLA What is Linguistics? Linguistics is the scientific study of language. Linguists (experts in linguistics) work on specific languages, but their primary goal is to understand the nature of language in general by asking questions such as: What distinguishes human language from other animal communication systems? What features are common to all human languages? How are the modes of linguistic communication (speech, writing, sign language) related to each other? How is language related to other types of human behavior? The main goal of linguistics, like all other intellectual disciplines, is to increase our knowledge and understanding of the world. Since language is universal and fundamental to all human interactions, the knowledge attained in linguistics has many practical applications. Linguists, with some training in other appropriate disciplines, are thus prepared to seek answers to questions such as: How can a previously unstudied language be analyzed and written? How can foreign languages best be taught and learned? How can speech be synthesized on a computer or how can a computer be programmed to understand human speech? How can the language problems of people with speech abnormalities be analyzed and rectified? How are linguistic issues in legal matters to be handled? The Sub-Fields of Linguistics Language is a phenomenon with many layers, from the sounds that speakers produce to the meanings that those sounds express. The field of Linguistics is comprised of several sub-fields. Most professional linguists become specialists in one or more of these sub-fields. The major ones are: Phonetics The study of speech sounds. Phoneticians study both the production of speech sounds by the human speech organs (articulatory phonetics) and the properties of the sounds themselves (acoustic phonetics). Phoneticians are concerned with such questions as: What are the sounds, from among all those that humans could make, that actually exist in the world's languages? What specially defines different "accents"? Can speakers be identified by "voiceprints"? What are the properties of sounds that would apply in computerized speech synthesis? Phonology The study of language sound systems. Phonologists are concerned with questions such as: What sounds contrast in one language but not another (answers to such questions explain why Spanish speakers have trouble with the difference between English sh and ch, or why English speakers have trouble with the different "u" sounds in French words like rue 'street' and roue 'wheel'.)? What sounds of a language can or cannot occur one after the other (for example, why can words begin in st– in English but not in Spanish)? How do poets or writers or song lyrics intuitively know how to match the rhythm of speech to the abstract rhythmic pattern of a poetic or musical meter? Morphology The study of word structure. Morphologists examine such questions as: To what extent are ways of forming words "productive" or not (e.g. why do English speakers say arrival and amusement but not arrivement and amusal)? What determines when words change form (for example, why does English have to add –er to adjectives when making comparisons, but Hebrew does not add any equivalent)? How can humans program computers to recognize the "root" of a word separated from its "affixes" (e.g. how could a computer recognize walk, walks, walking, and walked as the "same" word)? Syntax The study of how linguistic units larger than the word are constructed. Syntacticians address such questions as: How can the number of sentences that speakers can create be infinite in number even though the number of words in any language is finite? What makes a sentence like visiting relatives can be boring ambiguous? Why would English speakers judge a sentence like colorless green ideas sleep furiously to be "grammatical" even though it is nonsensical? How can languages express the same thoughts even though they construct their sentences in different ways (e.g. Why does English I saw them there mean the same thing as French je les y ai vus even though the order of elements in French is I them there have seen)? How can humans program a computer to analyze the structure of sentences? Semantics The study of meaning. Semanticists answer such questions as: How do speakers know what words mean (e.g. How does one know where red stops and orange starts)? What is the basis of metaphors (e.g. Why is my car is a lemon a "good" metaphor but my car is a cabbage is not)? What makes sentences like I'm looking for a tall student or the student I am looking for must be tall have more than one meaning? In a sentence like I regret that he lied, how do we know that, in fact, he did lie? How many meanings can be found in a sentence like three students read three books and why do just those meanings exist? In addition to these sub-fields, there are a number of other sub-fields that cross-cut them: Historical linguistics The study of how languages change over time, addressing such questions as why modern English is different form Old English and Middle English or what it means to say that English and German are "more closely related" to each other than English and French. Sociolinguistics The study of how language is used in society, addressing such questions as what makes some dialects more "prestigious" than others, where slang comes from and why it arises, or what happens when two languages come together in "bilingual" communities. Psycholinguistics The study of how language is processed in the mind, addressing such questions as how we can hear a string of language noises and make sense of them, how children can learn to speak and understand the language of their environment as quickly and effortlessly as they do, or how people with pathological language problems differ from people who have "normal" language. Neurolinguistics The study of the actual encoding of language in the brain, addressing such questions as what parts of the brain different aspects of language are stored in, how language is actually stored, what goes on physically in the brain when language is processed, or how the brain compensates when certain areas are damaged. Computational linguistics Learning and understanding a language involves computing the properties of that language that are described in its phonology, syntax, and semantics. The challenge of describing this process connects linguistics with computational issues at a very fundamental level. How could syntactic structures be computed from spoken language, how are semantic relations recognized, and how could these computational skills be acquired? IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD. According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND. ULTRA MAGA "Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic? It's time to dig up Joseph Mccarthey and show him TikTok, then duck. Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL

03-10-2022 18:17
Into the Night★★★★★ (21600)	Robert Wagner wrote: Into the Night wrote: Robert Wagner wrote: Into the Night wrote: Science isn't linguistics. There is no branch of science called 'linguistics'. There are no theories of science on that subject at all. ...deleted Mantras 16b...5...1a...17... No argument presented. Trolling. ...deleted Mantras 10j...1a... No argument presented. Trolling. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
03-10-2022 18:20
Into the Night★★★★★ (21600)	Swan wrote: Into the Night wrote: Swan wrote: Into the Night wrote: Swan wrote: [quote]IBdaMann wrote: [quote]Swan wrote:Actually, linguistics applies to both spoken and written words. Nope. "Linguistic" refers to the oral/spoken with the tongue, hence the prefix "lingui" (tongue). You referred specifically to his text response which required "rhetorically" or possibly "lexically" which refers to words. Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff. I'm here through Thursday. Actually, linguistics is the scientific study Science isn't linguistics. There is no branch of science called 'linguistics'. There are no theories of science on that subject at all. Swan wrote: of the physical, structural, functional, psychological, and social characteristics of human language, both spoken and written. ...deleted Mantras 7...5...1d... Languages is not a physical thing. There is no such thing as a 'psychological' language. There is no such thing as a 'social characteristic' language. Of course, this is no surprise you make this kind of idiocy because you don't know English, but claim you do. Semantics fallacy. ...deleted repetition... No argument presented. Spamming. Trolling. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
03-10-2022 22:04
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14416)	Swan wrote:Linguistics at UCLA Well, you sure know how to obliterate any credibility you might have had. UCLA? You might as well have cited "Linguistics at CNN."
03-10-2022 23:38
Into the Night★★★★★ (21600)	IBdaMann wrote: Swan wrote:Linguistics at UCLA Well, you sure know how to obliterate any credibility you might have had. UCLA? You might as well have cited "Linguistics at CNN." Nice comparison! The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
04-10-2022 00:53
Swan★★★★★ (5723)	IBdaMann wrote: Swan wrote:Linguistics at UCLA Well, you sure know how to obliterate any credibility you might have had. UCLA? You might as well have cited "Linguistics at CNN." Says the mental patient who denies the existence of both the last ice age and the holocaust. You may continue stroking your chicken IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD. According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND. ULTRA MAGA "Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic? It's time to dig up Joseph Mccarthey and show him TikTok, then duck. Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
04-10-2022 14:07
Swan★★★★★ (5723)	IBdaMann wrote: Swan wrote:Linguistics at UCLA Well, you sure know how to obliterate any credibility you might have had. UCLA? You might as well have cited "Linguistics at CNN." So basically, what you are saying is that CNN is BS and FOX news is real. Well FOX reported at least 100,000 times that Hillary Cliton was going to jail. Did she? and why did FOX claim that she was going to jail? The answer is that FOX feeds people's delusions just like CNN does and that there is only one truth and no American news source will ever report it. Not that programmed zombies like you can ever really see the communist truth, called America and the American media. IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD. According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND. ULTRA MAGA "Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic? It's time to dig up Joseph Mccarthey and show him TikTok, then duck. Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL
04-10-2022 15:52
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14416)	Swan wrote: IBdaMann wrote: Swan wrote:Linguistics at UCLA Well, you sure know how to obliterate any credibility you might have had. UCLA? You might as well have cited "Linguistics at CNN." So basically, what you are saying is that CNN is BS and FOX news is real. Your reading comprehension seems to be improving. You only got it mostly wrong. We don't have any news anymore. We only have thought controlling institutions that want to do my thinking for me. They do not provide me with empirical information and let me perform my own critical reasoning. Instead, they merely hand me the conclusions I am to reach and the beliefs that I am to hold. Fox news was one of the last to become BS, yes, but BS they have become. I have to be my own investigative reporter. I have to be my own news channel. Swan wrote: Not that programmed zombies like you can ever really see the communist truth, called America and the American media. Thank you, Swan. I'll have you know that you are my trusted news source when it comes to your tomatoes and eggplants, ... and the status of the FBI snubbing you. Rock on.
04-10-2022 18:36
Swan★★★★★ (5723)	IBdaMann wrote: Swan wrote: IBdaMann wrote: Swan wrote:Linguistics at UCLA Well, you sure know how to obliterate any credibility you might have had. UCLA? You might as well have cited "Linguistics at CNN." So basically, what you are saying is that CNN is BS and FOX news is real. Your reading comprehension seems to be improving. You only got it mostly wrong. We don't have any news anymore. We only have thought controlling institutions that want to do my thinking for me. They do not provide me with empirical information and let me perform my own critical reasoning. Instead, they merely hand me the conclusions I am to reach and the beliefs that I am to hold. Fox news was one of the last to become BS, yes, but BS they have become. I have to be my own investigative reporter. I have to be my own news channel. Swan wrote: Not that programmed zombies like you can ever really see the communist truth, called America and the American media. Thank you, Swan. I'll have you know that you are my trusted news source when it comes to your tomatoes and eggplants, ... and the status of the FBI snubbing you. Rock on. Says the idiot who denies the last ice age and the holocaust both. Face it, no one cares about your programmed nonsense IBdaMann claims that Gold is a molecule, and that the last ice age never happened because I was not there to see it. The only conclusion that can be drawn from this is that IBdaMann is clearly not using enough LSD. According to CDC/Government info, people who were vaccinated are now DYING at a higher rate than non-vaccinated people, which exposes the covid vaccines as the poison that they are, this is now fully confirmed by the terrorist CDC This place is quieter than the FBI commenting on the chink bank account information on Hunter Xiden's laptop I LOVE TRUMP BECAUSE HE PISSES OFF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT I CAN'T STAND. ULTRA MAGA "Being unwanted, unloved, uncared for, forgotten by everybody, I think that is a much greater hunger, a much greater poverty than the person who has nothing to eat." MOTHER THERESA OF CALCUTTA So why is helping to hide the murder of an American president patriotic? It's time to dig up Joseph Mccarthey and show him TikTok, then duck. Now be honest, was I correct or was I correct? LOL

Page 7 of 7

Join the debate Ding Dong the Witch is dead. That said queen elizabeth lived long enough to kill Princess Diana first:

Threads	Replies	Last post
Every time I say that this board is dead, someone says something to prove me wrong, but	9	01-01-2024 05:08
Linux is dead on the desktop, so do not even waste your time considering it	26	30-07-2023 03:21
Ding dong the wicked witch is dead. Shithead Oconnor dead, please Lord help me grieve	0	26-07-2023 22:12
Bodybuilder Gustavo Badel dead of covid vaccine stroke. Ans the real carnage begins	30	17-07-2023 15:41
DOJ, FBI targeting Catholics as 'violent extremists' FBI agents are ordered to shoot to kill	0	09-07-2023 17:57