Remember me
▼ Content

World Population


World Population26-03-2024 16:00
James_
★★★★★
(2230)
In 1950 when global warming started, the world population was about 2.5 Billion people. Today, the world population is about 8,019,876,189.

The projected world population on Jan. 1, 2024, is 8,019,876,189, an increase of 75,162,541 (0.95%) from New Year's Day 2023.

https://www.commerce.gov/news/blog/2024/01/census-bureau-projects-us-and-world-populations-new-years-day#:~:text=The%20projected%20world%20population%20on,the%20U.S.%20and%20world%20populations.

And about all graphs but CO2 will agree with the planet warming as the population increases. What's happening with the Panama Canal (https://www.climate-debate.com/forum/panama-canal-d6-e4803.php) might be an excellent example of man made climate change. After all, who's burning the Amazon rainforest? It's man. And ODSs (Ozone Depleting Substances) are man made as well.
RE: Ozone Depletion26-03-2024 19:16
James_
★★★★★
(2230)
This graph shows that chlorine levels and ozone depletion parallel warming.
As the black line rises, the numbers in black on the right are decreasing. It's
also known that as the stratosphere cools the troposphere warms, the heat's getting through.
Attached image:

RE: Deforestation Since 1950.......26-03-2024 19:25
James_
★★★★★
(2230)
If you look at the last 2 sections of the bar graph, the percentage of forest lost
has increased. This means less solar radiation is being absorbed because of photosynthesis. And then when the Amazon is being burned, that is heat being released. Simply a consequence of population growth.

[url] https://ourworldindata.org/world-lost-one-third-forests[/url]
Attached image:

RE: World Population...26-03-2024 19:33
James_
★★★★★
(2230)
And this graph shows that since 1950 that global population parallels warming.
Isn't it interesting how "ALL" of these graphs parallel global warming?

https://images.app.goo.gl/Yj2UGMgqNdbhc9vx9


Everything seems to suggests more people more warming.
Attached image:

26-03-2024 22:02
keepit
★★★★★
(3058)
More people, more real dollars spent, more dollars , more co2 produced.
26-03-2024 23:38
Xadoman
★★★★☆
(1035)
More population means more burning of fuels in cars, houses etc and that could have a minuscule effect of global warming but as soon as the fire stops the temperature also stops. The earth and its atmosphere is like a living room. If you burn more fuel then the temperature rises. As soon as the burning stops the temperature will start to fall again.

The earth was at once a molten blob with surface temperature over 5000 degrees. The oceans and all the accumulated CO2 in coal etc was in the atmosphere. The greenhouse effect should have been enourmous.

But the earth started to cool despite an enourmous greenhouse effect from the oceans and all the coal in the sky. The earth cooled then, it cools now and it continues to cool until the earth core cools completely down.

After that the earth is only warmed by the sun.
27-03-2024 00:31
James_
★★★★★
(2230)
keepit wrote:
More people, more real dollars spent, more dollars , more co2 produced.



More CO2 = more stratospheric ozone, source, IPCC and NOAA.




Join the debate World Population:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Alaskan Snow Crab Population Shrinks 90% In 3 Years818-10-2022 23:07
Population Change and Demography - the malthusian rate.9716-12-2019 15:42
Poulation controll revisited - CO2 compensation through population control814-11-2019 23:28
It's not overpopulation problem rather population mismanagement problem2414-11-2019 23:14
Global warming back to medieval warm period will increase Russia population 4 fold128-05-2019 19:30
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact