Time to Ban Swan?

James_ wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Unfortunately, there is no moderation, and banishment unlikely. If a Phd can't get administrative action, it's unlikely anyone else will. The pathetic loser will continue to plague this site. He has no other source of attention, good or bad.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Harvey summed it up pretty well and hit the nail on the head.

It is difficult to imagine a moderated discussion where there would not be cause for the banning Swan.

They all have at least some kind of red line where common decency is just not being respected to the point where the behavior is intolerable.

For some moderators, the habit of mockery with posts for the sole purpose of being a heckler and a pest would be enough.

Other moderators might be more tolerant of the spam and mockery, but would draw the line at overt racism and homophobia.

To Swan's credit, he did not feel the need to post or repost the name of another site member's sons and mother, with a map to the home address, phone number, e mail, full name, birthdate, and more.

Even Elon Musk has a red line around doxxing.

But that wouldn't have been enough to get Swan banned at THIS website.

Just ask IBdaMann and Into the Night. Nine and eight years, respectively, of trolling with impunity.

But if someone pesters Branner enough, he will at least remove the specific posts where a member gets doxxed in the manner described.

I have been following this chat room for more than 4 years, and I have not found any other commenter here I believe to be decent.

If decency is a prerequisite for a chat room, then all chat rooms may as well be shut down.

Facebook, Twitter, Instagram are just peddling sexy pics, either explicitly or implicitly. Nothing more than cyber brothels.

Food porn and cute baby pics are about the maximum amount of decency you will find.

Also...

Maybe some adorable animals. Beautiful nature pics. And people showing off their talents.

But my point is, you cannot find any decent conversations on the internet.

I think Swan is the guy who has stalked me for 18 years online. Enjoy his company.

p.s., In the U.S., cyber stalking and bullying is legal.

Spongy Iris wrote:

James_ wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Unfortunately, there is no moderation, and banishment unlikely. If a Phd can't get administrative action, it's unlikely anyone else will. The pathetic loser will continue to plague this site. He has no other source of attention, good or bad.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Harvey summed it up pretty well and hit the nail on the head.

It is difficult to imagine a moderated discussion where there would not be cause for the banning Swan.

They all have at least some kind of red line where common decency is just not being respected to the point where the behavior is intolerable.

For some moderators, the habit of mockery with posts for the sole purpose of being a heckler and a pest would be enough.

Other moderators might be more tolerant of the spam and mockery, but would draw the line at overt racism and homophobia.

To Swan's credit, he did not feel the need to post or repost the name of another site member's sons and mother, with a map to the home address, phone number, e mail, full name, birthdate, and more.

Even Elon Musk has a red line around doxxing.

But that wouldn't have been enough to get Swan banned at THIS website.

Just ask IBdaMann and Into the Night. Nine and eight years, respectively, of trolling with impunity.

But if someone pesters Branner enough, he will at least remove the specific posts where a member gets doxxed in the manner described.

I have been following this chat room for more than 4 years, and I have not found any other commenter here I believe to be decent.

If decency is a prerequisite for a chat room, then all chat rooms may as well be shut down.

Facebook, Twitter, Instagram are just peddling sexy pics, either explicitly or implicitly. Nothing more than cyber brothels.

Food porn and cute baby pics are about the maximum amount of decency you will find.

Also...

Maybe some adorable animals. Beautiful nature pics. And people showing off their talents.

But my point is, you cannot find any decent conversations on the internet.

I think Swan is the guy who has stalked me for 18 years online. Enjoy his company.

p.s., In the U.S., cyber stalking and bullying is legal.

Is it not flattering to have a fan?

There's another forum I frequent that gets posts from the messiah who is active in this forum. But the messiah's posts never stay up for more than few minutes before the moderators delete them. I get bothered by that forum for censoring conversations. Lots of the users there refer to their chat room as home, and may as well be sucking off the moderators. To me that comes across as worse bullying, silencing the beautiful minds.

I don't really see what the point is of spamming a forum with insults. Maybe it's practicing a comedy routine. But I don't get bothered by it.

James_ wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

James_ wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Unfortunately, there is no moderation, and banishment unlikely. If a Phd can't get administrative action, it's unlikely anyone else will. The pathetic loser will continue to plague this site. He has no other source of attention, good or bad.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Harvey summed it up pretty well and hit the nail on the head.

It is difficult to imagine a moderated discussion where there would not be cause for the banning Swan.

They all have at least some kind of red line where common decency is just not being respected to the point where the behavior is intolerable.

For some moderators, the habit of mockery with posts for the sole purpose of being a heckler and a pest would be enough.

Other moderators might be more tolerant of the spam and mockery, but would draw the line at overt racism and homophobia.

To Swan's credit, he did not feel the need to post or repost the name of another site member's sons and mother, with a map to the home address, phone number, e mail, full name, birthdate, and more.

Even Elon Musk has a red line around doxxing.

But that wouldn't have been enough to get Swan banned at THIS website.

Just ask IBdaMann and Into the Night. Nine and eight years, respectively, of trolling with impunity.

But if someone pesters Branner enough, he will at least remove the specific posts where a member gets doxxed in the manner described.

I have been following this chat room for more than 4 years, and I have not found any other commenter here I believe to be decent.

If decency is a prerequisite for a chat room, then all chat rooms may as well be shut down.

Facebook, Twitter, Instagram are just peddling sexy pics, either explicitly or implicitly. Nothing more than cyber brothels.

Food porn and cute baby pics are about the maximum amount of decency you will find.

Also...

Maybe some adorable animals. Beautiful nature pics. And people showing off their talents.

But my point is, you cannot find any decent conversations on the internet.

I think Swan is the guy who has stalked me for 18 years online. Enjoy his company.

p.s., In the U.S., cyber stalking and bullying is legal.

Is it not flattering to have a fan?

There's another forum I frequent that gets posts from the messiah who is active in this forum. But the messiah's posts never stay up for more than few minutes before the moderators delete them. I get bothered by that forum for censoring conversations. Lots of the users there refer to their chat room as home, and may as well be sucking off the moderators. To me that comes across as worse bullying, silencing the beautiful minds.

I don't really see what the point is of spamming a forum with insults. Maybe it's practicing a comedy routine. But I don't get bothered by it.

He posted that I am gay and that I lost my rectum because of how much he sodomized me. My stalker also likes the person who molested over 10 children.
He molested his own children, then those in another family and then a couple
of my brothers.
Yet I am bad and he is good, he is nice when I am not. Enjoy his company.

Spongy Iris wrote:
Actually I don't believe in censorship, even for Swan, the local hobo ranting on this commuter train.

Now I miss IBDM...

Im a BM wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
Actually I don't believe in censorship, even for Swan, the local hobo ranting on this commuter train.

Now I miss IBDM...

I don't believe in state-sponsored censorship.

Im a BM wrote:

I do believe that if this website had a responsible moderator, Swan would have been banned at least four years ago.

Im a BM wrote:

I do believe that if there were fewer ugly thread titles, such as the many, many threads by Swan, this website would have been less unattractive to decent people.

Im a BM wrote:

You won't have to miss IBDM for long. Like the New Messiah, he always comes back again.

Im a BM wrote:

Into the Night and IBdaMann may have more total posts than Swan.

Im a BM wrote:

Swan holds the record for the most new threads by any one member.

Im a BM wrote:

Swan has been averaging FIVE NEW THREADS EVERY DAY for several days in a row.

I think the website administrator agrees with Spongy Iris that there should be no kind of "censorship".

Im a BM wrote:

There will be no limit to how many new rants Swan can post here every day.

I have my doubts about whether or not "James" is still alive.

Time to ban Swan?

Im a BM wrote:

Only if he tries to sell Temu Coupons or get donations for his Divine Plan to not allow God to destroy us all.

Into the Night wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
Actually I don't believe in censorship, even for Swan, the local hobo ranting on this commuter train.

Now I miss IBDM...

I don't believe in state-sponsored censorship.

Yes you do, liar.

Im a BM wrote:

I do believe that if this website had a responsible moderator, Swan would have been banned at least four years ago.

No, it would be YOU. It is YOU spamming and cross thread spamming.

Im a BM wrote:

I do believe that if there were fewer ugly thread titles, such as the many, many threads by Swan, this website would have been less unattractive to decent people.

The problem is YOU and your spamming.

Im a BM wrote:

You won't have to miss IBDM for long. Like the New Messiah, he always comes back again.

Good!

Im a BM wrote:

Into the Night and IBdaMann may have more total posts than Swan.

I am number one (mostly due to how long I've been here) and IBDaMann I believe is number two.

Im a BM wrote:

Swan holds the record for the most new threads by any one member.

Itself not a problem.

Im a BM wrote:

Swan has been averaging FIVE NEW THREADS EVERY DAY for several days in a row.

I think the website administrator agrees with Spongy Iris that there should be no kind of "censorship".

You don't get to speak for anyone except yourself. Omniscience fallacy.

Im a BM wrote:

There will be no limit to how many new rants Swan can post here every day.

I have my doubts about whether or not "James" is still alive.

Time to ban Swan?

For what?

The spamming problem is YOU. It is YOU that is spamming and cross thread spamming. People have been banned from this site for EXACTLY THAT.

Im a BM wrote:

Only if he tries to sell Temu Coupons or get donations for his Divine Plan to not allow God to destroy us all.

Irrelevant these days, since Branner has not been maintaining the site and has designated no assistant or successor.

Frankly, Swan isn't the problem. YOU ARE.

Swan wrote:

The Rodney Dangerfield of the judge is wearing nipple clamps under that robe

Into the Night wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:
Actually I don't believe in censorship, even for Swan, the local hobo ranting on this commuter train.

Now I miss IBDM...

RQAA

Yes you do, liar.

Im a BM wrote:

RQAA

No, it would be YOU. It is YOU spamming and cross thread spamming.

Im a BM wrote:

RQAA

The problem is YOU and your spamming.

Im a BM wrote:

RQAA

Good!

Im a BM wrote:

Into the Night and IBdaMann may have more total posts than Swan.

I am number one (mostly due to how long I've been here) and IBDaMann I believe is number two.

Im a BM wrote:

Swan holds the record for the most new threads by any one member.

Itself not a problem.

Im a BM wrote:

RQAA

You don't get to speak for anyone except yourself. Omniscience fallacy.

Im a BM wrote:

RQAA

For what?

The spamming problem is YOU. It is YOU that is spamming and cross thread spamming. People have been banned from this site for EXACTLY THAT.

Im a BM wrote:
RQAA

Irrelevant these days, since Branner has not been maintaining the site and has designated no assistant or successor.

Frankly, Swan isn't the problem. YOU ARE.

Im a BM wrote:

Branner, the climate-debate.com website administrator, continues to delete the New Messiah's threads.

I didn't even contact Branner to let him know about the most recent New Messiah incursion. Within a few weeks of the newest attack, Branner had independently discovered the problem and removed the 70+ newest threads.

Im a BM wrote:

Once again, Branner had the opportunity to view the nature of the discussion and evaluate Swan's threads. Swan's threads never get deleted.

Im a BM wrote:

And NOW, under a very different and new viewership regime, Swan's threads actually pick up "views" now - dozens of new "views" per day.

Into the Night's "Basic Dogma" thread was picking up about one new view every four days until the dam broke this summer. Now it picks up dozens of new "views" every day.

It may or may not represent actual human beings consciously selecting the thread to open it up and actually view it.

If the new viewership regime only represents AI bots or other software manipulations to rack up "views", it is not indiscriminate. Some threads pick up a lot more "views" than others.

Im a BM wrote:

At least AI understands that there really IS such a thing as "biogeochemistry".

Im a BM wrote:

Unlike a scientifically illiterate Internet troll, AI IS capable of learning.

Im a BM wrote:

At least Into the Night finally learned ONE relevant fact:

"..IBdaMann I believe is number two." - Into the Night.

Amen to that!

Swan wrote:

James_ wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Unfortunately, there is no moderation, and banishment unlikely. If a Phd can't get administrative action, it's unlikely anyone else will. The pathetic loser will continue to plague this site. He has no other source of attention, good or bad.

If nothing else Swan will know while this site was toxic before he posted here, now
what? What's worse than a toxic website?

Unfortunately, you are correct as the truth that I help reveal is far more toxic than the lie designed for fools to believe. Meaning that you are scared of the truth, an analogy is how the democrats just banned RFKjr from the democratic party

Yawning

Im a BM wrote:

Swan wrote:

James_ wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Unfortunately, there is no moderation, and banishment unlikely. If a Phd can't get administrative action, it's unlikely anyone else will. The pathetic loser will continue to plague this site. He has no other source of attention, good or bad.

If nothing else Swan will know while this site was toxic before he posted here, now
what? What's worse than a toxic website?

Unfortunately, you are correct as the truth that I help reveal is far more toxic than the lie designed for fools to believe. Meaning that you are scared of the truth, an analogy is how the democrats just banned RFKjr from the democratic party

Yawning

Remember when RFK Jr ran for president of the United States?

Seems like such a long time ago now.

Well, now RFK Jr gets to speak up at Cabinet meetings to curry favor with Carrot Face, going on about how many whales are killed by wind turbines. Nobody else there gets to ad lib like that, instead of just kissing ass.

With a revolutionary approach to medical science, RFK Jr has rebounded from his banishment from the Democratic Party. Purging all the corrupt doctors from positions of power, and cutting off the federal teat funding for corrupt medical research. There's no vaccine like no vaccine. Fluoride induced medical problems will be cured by just accepting good old fashioned tooth decay again. Autism turns out to be caused by SO MANY things now, but maverick scientists have bucked the establishment to invent a cure.

Pretty soon, RFK Jr will have that great epiphany and realize that anthropogenic global warming is just a HOAX. He will come out with praise for the wonderful Greening of the Earth and discontinue any criticism of the Holy Gas of Life.

Future generations will praise the scientific genius of RFK Jr, and the wisdom of Donald Trump for putting him in a position to "go wild on health" for America.

Got measles? Do NOT take Tylenol for it! It will cause you to suffer the kind of "mitochondrial issues" that can be diagnosed just by looking at you as you walk past in the airport.

Wasn't it hilarious what RFK Jr did with that dead bear in Central Park?

James_ wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Unfortunately, there is no moderation, and banishment unlikely. If a Phd can't get administrative action, it's unlikely anyone else will. The pathetic loser will continue to plague this site. He has no other source of attention, good or bad.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Harvey summed it up pretty well and hit the nail on the head.

It is difficult to imagine a moderated discussion where there would not be cause for the banning Swan.

They all have at least some kind of red line where common decency is just not being respected to the point where the behavior is intolerable.

For some moderators, the habit of mockery with posts for the sole purpose of being a heckler and a pest would be enough.

Other moderators might be more tolerant of the spam and mockery, but would draw the line at overt racism and homophobia.

To Swan's credit, he did not feel the need to post or repost the name of another site member's sons and mother, with a map to the home address, phone number, e mail, full name, birthdate, and more.

Even Elon Musk has a red line around doxxing.

But that wouldn't have been enough to get Swan banned at THIS website.

Just ask IBdaMann and Into the Night. Nine and eight years, respectively, of trolling with impunity.

But if someone pesters Branner enough, he will at least remove the specific posts where a member gets doxxed in the manner described.

I have been following this chat room for more than 4 years, and I have not found any other commenter here I believe to be decent.

If decency is a prerequisite for a chat room, then all chat rooms may as well be shut down.

Facebook, Twitter, Instagram are just peddling sexy pics, either explicitly or implicitly. Nothing more than cyber brothels.

Food porn and cute baby pics are about the maximum amount of decency you will find.

Also...

Maybe some adorable animals. Beautiful nature pics. And people showing off their talents.

But my point is, you cannot find any decent conversations on the internet.

I think Swan is the guy who has stalked me for 18 years online. Enjoy his company.

p.s., In the U.S., cyber stalking and bullying is legal.

Swan wrote:

James_ wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Unfortunately, there is no moderation, and banishment unlikely. If a Phd can't get administrative action, it's unlikely anyone else will. The pathetic loser will continue to plague this site. He has no other source of attention, good or bad.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Harvey summed it up pretty well and hit the nail on the head.

It is difficult to imagine a moderated discussion where there would not be cause for the banning Swan.

They all have at least some kind of red line where common decency is just not being respected to the point where the behavior is intolerable.

For some moderators, the habit of mockery with posts for the sole purpose of being a heckler and a pest would be enough.

Other moderators might be more tolerant of the spam and mockery, but would draw the line at overt racism and homophobia.

To Swan's credit, he did not feel the need to post or repost the name of another site member's sons and mother, with a map to the home address, phone number, e mail, full name, birthdate, and more.

Even Elon Musk has a red line around doxxing.

But that wouldn't have been enough to get Swan banned at THIS website.

Just ask IBdaMann and Into the Night. Nine and eight years, respectively, of trolling with impunity.

But if someone pesters Branner enough, he will at least remove the specific posts where a member gets doxxed in the manner described.

I have been following this chat room for more than 4 years, and I have not found any other commenter here I believe to be decent.

If decency is a prerequisite for a chat room, then all chat rooms may as well be shut down.

Facebook, Twitter, Instagram are just peddling sexy pics, either explicitly or implicitly. Nothing more than cyber brothels.

Food porn and cute baby pics are about the maximum amount of decency you will find.

Also...

Maybe some adorable animals. Beautiful nature pics. And people showing off their talents.

But my point is, you cannot find any decent conversations on the internet.

I think Swan is the guy who has stalked me for 18 years online. Enjoy his company.

p.s., In the U.S., cyber stalking and bullying is legal.

In that case you should submit a tip to the FBI. Here is the official link

https://tips.fbi.gov/home

Now grow a pair and do it

James_ wrote:
While this is a toxic forum, no one ever answered to anyone. Just never happened.

Im a BM wrote:

James_ wrote:
While this is a toxic forum, no one ever answered to anyone. Just never happened.

Hidden within this toxic forum is a library of biogeochemistry.

Is it time to ban Swan?

He's almost the only one left.

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

James_ wrote:
While this is a toxic forum, no one ever answered to anyone. Just never happened.

Hidden within this toxic forum is a library of biogeochemistry.

Is it time to ban Swan?

He's almost the only one left.

Banning Swan is like Adam banning Eve

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

James_ wrote:
While this is a toxic forum, no one ever answered to anyone. Just never happened.

Hidden within this toxic forum is a library of biogeochemistry.

Is it time to ban Swan?

He's almost the only one left.

Banning Swan is like Adam banning Eve

Nah it's probably the total opposite. Swan is dead wrong in just about every intellectual assertion.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

James_ wrote:
While this is a toxic forum, no one ever answered to anyone. Just never happened.

Hidden within this toxic forum is a library of biogeochemistry.

Is it time to ban Swan?

He's almost the only one left.

Banning Swan is like Adam banning Eve

Nah it's probably the total opposite. Swan is dead wrong in just about every intellectual assertion.

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

James_ wrote:
While this is a toxic forum, no one ever answered to anyone. Just never happened.

Hidden within this toxic forum is a library of biogeochemistry.

Is it time to ban Swan?

He's almost the only one left.

Banning Swan is like Adam banning Eve

Nah it's probably the total opposite. Swan is dead wrong in just about every intellectual assertion.

Thank you, thank you very much

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

James_ wrote:
While this is a toxic forum, no one ever answered to anyone. Just never happened.

Hidden within this toxic forum is a library of biogeochemistry.

Is it time to ban Swan?

He's almost the only one left.

Banning Swan is like Adam banning Eve

Nah it's probably the total opposite. Swan is dead wrong in just about every intellectual assertion.

Thank you, thank you very much

LOL, ok Elvis.

Burning Love cover drops, NOW.

https://youtube.com/shorts/EcU1cFO9bT8?si=SdEX-vJpzYVu8WIc

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

James_ wrote:
While this is a toxic forum, no one ever answered to anyone. Just never happened.

Hidden within this toxic forum is a library of biogeochemistry.

Is it time to ban Swan?

He's almost the only one left.

Banning Swan is like Adam banning Eve

Nah it's probably the total opposite. Swan is dead wrong in just about every intellectual assertion.

Thank you, thank you very much

LOL, ok Elvis.

Burning Love cover drops, NOW.

https://youtube.com/shorts/EcU1cFO9bT8?si=SdEX-vJpzYVu8WIc

Only a fool covers the king

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Im a BM wrote:

James_ wrote:
While this is a toxic forum, no one ever answered to anyone. Just never happened.

Hidden within this toxic forum is a library of biogeochemistry.

Is it time to ban Swan?

He's almost the only one left.

Banning Swan is like Adam banning Eve

Nah it's probably the total opposite. Swan is dead wrong in just about every intellectual assertion.

Thank you, thank you very much

LOL, ok Elvis.

Burning Love cover drops, NOW.

https://youtube.com/shorts/EcU1cFO9bT8?si=SdEX-vJpzYVu8WIc

Only a fool covers the king

Everybody plays the fool.

https://youtu.be/3CcOxwc8WGY?si=d8Pl3qvmI0_RgCP0

Song time 3:22