Remember me
▼ Content

Libertarians will Love what Trump did Today


Libertarians will Love what Trump did Today09-10-2019 23:05
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(4906)
Trump is making sweeping revisions on all of the executive branch ... prohibiting arbitrary bureacratic regulation that isn't approved by Congress and overseen by the White House. This means regulatory agencies cannot simply "make up" regulations by which We the People must abide, i.e. they cannot comprise a fourth branch of government that is not accountable to the people.

As a first step, *all* agencies must identify *all* of their regulations and put them on a designated website so that it is known. Anything that is not posted is automatically rescinded.

Then it will all need to pass Congressional scrutiny and then Trump will decide if it should remain.

The big question for us here on this site is just how much "Climate" crap will be affected and be flushed away.

Additionally, Trump is reversing the previous administration's war on incandescent lightbulbs. Both types of bulbs can now be available.

Stupid Press: Trump concludes the press announcement and the media immediately abandons the topic and starts asking questions about Turkey. They don't want the discussion to remain focused on what Trump just accomplished.


.


Global Warming: The preferred religion of the scientifically illiterate.

Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit

When the alt-physics birds sing about "indivisible bodies," we've got pure BS. - VernerHornung

Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
09-10-2019 23:34
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(9573)
IBdaMann wrote:
Trump is making sweeping revisions on all of the executive branch ... prohibiting arbitrary bureacratic regulation that isn't approved by Congress and overseen by the White House. This means regulatory agencies cannot simply "make up" regulations by which We the People must abide, i.e. they cannot comprise a fourth branch of government that is not accountable to the people.

WooHoo!
IBdaMann wrote:
As a first step, *all* agencies must identify *all* of their regulations and put them on a designated website so that it is known. Anything that is not posted is automatically rescinded.

A great step! I would additionally place a 30 day requirement on posting before Congress acts upon it, so people can be aware and contact their representatives with their opinion, else it is automatically rescinded.
IBdaMann wrote:
Then it will all need to pass Congressional scrutiny and then Trump will decide if it should remain.

There it is. A swamp draining canal if there ever was one!
IBdaMann wrote:
The big question for us here on this site is just how much "Climate" crap will be affected and be flushed away.

Depends on how much existing regulation is just grandfathered in.
IBdaMann wrote:
Additionally, Trump is reversing the previous administration's war on incandescent lightbulbs. Both types of bulbs can now be available.
WooHoo! Chicken ranchers can finally use just a cheap light bulb to keep their chicks warm again! People can light their homes and businesses with whatever they want!
IBdaMann wrote:
Stupid Press: Trump concludes the press announcement and the media immediately abandons the topic and starts asking questions about Turkey. They don't want the discussion to remain focused on what Trump just accomplished.


What? Cover the demise of an oligarchy? This is the PRESS we're talking about!



The Parrot Killer
10-10-2019 00:27
HarveyH55
★★★★☆
(1347)
Sounds great, if only our representatives would actually listen, and not just do what they believe is best for us, dumb people. I mean, we were stupid enough to vote for them...

Me, I think I'll stick with the LED lights. Incandescent didn't seem to last very long, and then you throw them away. Least the LEDs can be taken apart, and the lights are usually fine, the driving circuit fails.

I've got a hunch a lot of Climate Change crap will get flushed, since most serves no actual purpose, other than the political points, for doing something. Should be interest to see where this goes. Can't be popular with the democrats, red-tape and regulations are there favorite tools.
10-10-2019 05:48
GasGuzzler
★★★★☆
(1431)
HarveyH55 wrote:
Least the LEDs can be taken apart, and the lights are usually fine, the driving circuit fails.


Don't want to derail the thread, I LOVE what trump is doing here!

Harvey, are you saying LED's are repairable? I just picked up a couple of 20,000 lumen yard lights. I love these things but they were close to $100 each, but they light up immediately, last 25,000 hours and only use around 100 watts. We can see deer in the hay field at night at 250 yds! I thought maybe I needed to have my head examined for dropping a C note for a light bulb, but if they are repairable, tell me more!


I think people screw me over because they don't want to see someone willing to put out the effort that they won't.~James~
Edited on 10-10-2019 05:50
10-10-2019 06:02
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(4906)
GasGuzzler wrote:Don't want to derail the thread,

Harvey, are you saying LED's are repairable?


Ooops, ... derailed.




I'm sure Trump will cut a trade deal with Taiwan cutting tariffs on LEDs and put the thread back on track.

.


Global Warming: The preferred religion of the scientifically illiterate.

Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit

When the alt-physics birds sing about "indivisible bodies," we've got pure BS. - VernerHornung

Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
10-10-2019 11:36
HarveyH55
★★★★☆
(1347)
GasGuzzler wrote:
HarveyH55 wrote:
Least the LEDs can be taken apart, and the lights are usually fine, the driving circuit fails.


Don't want to derail the thread, I LOVE what trump is doing here!

Harvey, are you saying LED's are repairable? I just picked up a couple of 20,000 lumen yard lights. I love these things but they were close to $100 each, but they light up immediately, last 25,000 hours and only use around 100 watts. We can see deer in the hay field at night at 250 yds! I thought maybe I needed to have my head examined for dropping a C note for a light bulb, but if they are repairable, tell me more!


I've not attempt to replace the driver circuit, but have reused some of the LED. I buy the cheaper bulbs, for regular household use. $6 isn't worth repairing to me, likely safer too. For your $100 bulb, I'd look into though. It really depends on why it failed. Usually, the problem is heat, and the driver circuit fails first, probably a safety consideration, to reduce the heat quickly. I really prefer low voltage circuits, and not too enthusiastic about potentially getting shocked. Low voltage seldom results in flames as well. 10 watts is the brightest LED I have, runs of 6 volts, over 2 Amps, gets hot pretty quick. Little concern about my choice of heatsinks, and don't leave it on long or unattended. Probably fine though.

The thing with LEDs, is that they are current driven devices. You need a certain voltage to get them to turn on, and will use all the current you feed them. More current, the brighter they shine, until they burn up. You need to provide a constant current driver, that doesn't provide excessive current. High wattage LEDs aren't an easy guess, like regular 5 mm ones. I don't know enough to really know how to fix those bulbs, likely could be though. You need some specs on the LED itself, little outside my knowledge.
12-10-2019 21:38
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(4906)
GasGuzzler wrote: Don't want to derail the thread, I LOVE what trump is doing here!

As long as the thread is derailed,

I had mentioned YAP to you in a PM and it got me wondering ... so I popped back in and apparently I said something that got me banned for two hours.

I'm going to see if I can post a screenshot.


Global Warming: The preferred religion of the scientifically illiterate.

Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit

When the alt-physics birds sing about "indivisible bodies," we've got pure BS. - VernerHornung

Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
Attached image:

13-10-2019 01:00
HarveyH55
★★★★☆
(1347)
IBdaMann wrote:
GasGuzzler wrote: Don't want to derail the thread, I LOVE what trump is doing here!

As long as the thread is derailed,

I had mentioned YAP to you in a PM and it got me wondering ... so I popped back in and apparently I said something that got me banned for two hours.

I'm going to see if I can post a screenshot.


Banned? Here? Was any reason given? Seems like you would to need to know some details, to avoid transgressing in the future.

Has anyone else been banned in the past? Doesn't seem like a lot of moderating being done. Usually, there are warnings, threads closed or deleted.

I've probably pushed the limits a time or two, though I do try to be reasonably well behaved. Wonder if James ever got banned, he's definitely gone over the edge a few times, well frequently...

Guess somebody got their 'feelings' hurt.
13-10-2019 02:05
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(4906)
HarveyH55 wrote:Banned? Here?

Banned temporarily, yes, but not here.

I had thought GasGuzzler might have been a particular poster (which it turns out that he is not) from a site I used to frequent before I left because of abusive leftist censorship. I was curious to see if the site was still active (which it was) and it hasn't changed. The site's stated purpose is a "bipartisan" political board. The reality is that it is heavily moderated snowflake safe space where conservatives may certainly post as long as it is docile with all traces of microagressions removed ... lest one be banned temporarily or permanently. As you know, I prefer to deal in the macroagressions and so I can't tell you what got me banned (temporarily) ... it could have been my pro-Trump posts, it could have been my calling out one of the Marxists, ... but the truth is that I can only speculate that some moderator felt obligated to righteously ban me and preserve the "safe space" bubble.


HarveyH55 wrote:Has anyone else been banned in the past?

Weren't you here for trafn? If not, do a search on his name.

He has a book available on Amazon about his apocalyptic theory of the end of the world at the hands of MMCC (man-made climate change) ... which he pinpoints as having started at Spindletop.

Bursting the Atmosphere: What Happens When Rain Falls Up
by Robert Ben Mitchell

He originally came to the board (as trafn ) to socialize his book but quickly became a tmiddles, i.e. pretending to want to learn but lashing out at differing viewpoints. He pestered Branner to let him be a moderator of his own sub-board ... but he could not bear the thought of differing opinions being expressed outside his control on regular Climate-Debate so he started spamming the entire board until Branner banned him.

HarveyH55 wrote:I've probably pushed the limits a time or two, though I do try to be reasonably well behaved.

Harvey, you are an exemplar for behavior. You have never pushed any limits that I have seen.

HarveyH55 wrote:Wonder if James ever got banned, he's definitely gone over the edge a few times, well frequently...

To be honest, I have never seen James write or do anything even remotely deserving of even a warning. Both you and he are more or less the ideal posters for a site to have since you both represent divergent political views, you aren't offending anyone and you honestly express what you believe. Into the Night falls in that category as well.

None of you are under any risk of being censured.


.


Global Warming: The preferred religion of the scientifically illiterate.

Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit

When the alt-physics birds sing about "indivisible bodies," we've got pure BS. - VernerHornung

Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
13-10-2019 02:19
GasGuzzler
★★★★☆
(1431)
I got ur PM about YAP. I signed up and started pushing Mr Victor Danilchenko's buttons on some "climate related weather" stuff. Half a dozen posts and he's backed into a corner and has suddenly gone MIA. (he was responding within about 2 minutes)
I did not get banned though....congrats on that!!
13-10-2019 02:33
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(4906)
GasGuzzler wrote:
I got ur PM about YAP. I signed up and started pushing Mr Victor Danilchenko's buttons on some "climate related weather" stuff. Half a dozen posts and he's backed into a corner and has suddenly gone MIA. (he was responding within about 2 minutes)
I did not get banned though....congrats on that!!


I take every opportunity to poke mostomotus who is a moderator. He is absolutely dishonest, in every respect. He is a hard core leftist and an incorrigible warmizombie.

.


Global Warming: The preferred religion of the scientifically illiterate.

Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit

When the alt-physics birds sing about "indivisible bodies," we've got pure BS. - VernerHornung

Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
13-10-2019 10:20
spot
★★★★☆
(1077)
Trump has sold the Kurds down the river, latest disgusting thing for you to justify.

Can't wait to hear the mental gymnastics on this.
13-10-2019 15:58
HarveyH55
★★★★☆
(1347)
spot wrote:
Trump has sold the Kurds down the river, latest disgusting thing for you to justify.

Can't wait to hear the mental gymnastics on this.


I'm not entirely sure about all the details of why or what all we were doing in Syria, beyond ISIS. Best I can figure, those Middle Eastern countries have always been fighting among themselves. They even elect their governments by the sword. Peace is only achieved through superior military power. I'm not sure about the Kurds, which don't seem to have their own country, but seem to want some land to call their own. ISIS is a worldwide threat, which I'd prefer to be fought in somebody else country. I'd prefer to see a lot of our troop come home, from most every country on the planet. Do we still need them in Germany? Most fighting start from the air, and the see anymore, and doesn't take more than a day to get troops on the ground, anywhere on Earth, if needed. Our military, shouldn't be a freebie for every other country, which should have their own, if the think the need it. There is nothing wrong with helping people out. But, do we really need to hold their hand, forever? It's their country, if they aren't serious about keeping it, we shouldn't be doing it for them, free of charge. It's not really free though, they are most protecting somebodies business interests. Private businesses should be hiring their own security, instead of using our tax dollars and military to protect their profits.

The ISIS uprising in Syria was squashed, and their forces should be able to deal with what remains. I don't think it's going to be possible to get them all. The Kurds had their own interest in it, and would have fought, with, or without us, but does that mean our troops need to join their fight with Turkey or Syria? We got the job done, that we went over there to do. And, no matter how long we stay, when we pull out, the fighting starts again. That's what they do over in the Middle East, and probably always will. Our interest is keeping the terrorist over there. We've been in Afghanistan for 18 years or more, and the Taliban, is eager for us to leave, so they can turn it back to the way it was. When do we stop fighting everybody else's wars for them?
13-10-2019 20:17
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(4906)
spot wrote:
Trump has sold the Kurds down the river, latest disgusting thing for you to justify.

Can't wait to hear the mental gymnastics on this.

spot! Everytime you chime in it's a pleasure. It is certainly fitting that you carry the torch on this one.

I recommend this video for everyone, and spot, please pay close attention at the 42-second mark ... it's the complete understanding of the reason for your post

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAWJa0VMyl4&t=198s

[m i n d l e s s i n d e n t u r e d r e g u r g i t a t i o n]


.


Global Warming: The preferred religion of the scientifically illiterate.

Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit

When the alt-physics birds sing about "indivisible bodies," we've got pure BS. - VernerHornung

Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
13-10-2019 20:51
spot
★★★★☆
(1077)
IBdaMann wrote:
spot wrote:
Trump has sold the Kurds down the river, latest disgusting thing for you to justify.

Can't wait to hear the mental gymnastics on this.

spot! Everytime you chime in it's a pleasure. It is certainly fitting that you carry the torch on this one.

I recommend this video for everyone, and spot, please pay close attention at the 42-second mark ... it's the complete understanding of the reason for your post

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAWJa0VMyl4&t=198s

[m i n d l e s s i n d e n t u r e d r e g u r g i t a t i o n]


.


So your argument is the reports coming from your own soldiers is media bias?

I know this is all a joke to you but it really is disgusting.


IBdaMann wrote:
"Air" is not a body in and of itself. Ergo it is not a blackbody.


Planck's law describes the spectral density of electromagnetic radiation emitted by a black body in thermal equilibrium at a given temperature T.
14-10-2019 01:33
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(4906)
spot wrote:
IBdaMann wrote:
spot wrote:
Trump has sold the Kurds down the river, latest disgusting thing for you to justify.

Can't wait to hear the mental gymnastics on this.

spot! Everytime you chime in it's a pleasure. It is certainly fitting that you carry the torch on this one.

I recommend this video for everyone, and spot, please pay close attention at the 42-second mark ... it's the complete understanding of the reason for your post

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAWJa0VMyl4

[m i n d l e s s i n d e n t u r e d r e g u r g i t a t i o n]


.


So your argument is the reports coming from your own soldiers is media bias?

I know this is all a joke to you but it really is disgusting.

spot! You're still with us, YESSS!

Hey, was your response intended to be a response to the post above it? I ask because it does not follow. I'm guessing that you intended to respond to a different post but clicked the wrong "quote" button.

Otherwise the answer is "No, I think."

Oh, and somehow the video I posted ended up with a start-tag. Please use this one:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAWJa0VMyl4

.


Global Warming: The preferred religion of the scientifically illiterate.

Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit

When the alt-physics birds sing about "indivisible bodies," we've got pure BS. - VernerHornung

Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
Edited on 14-10-2019 01:36
14-10-2019 02:38
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(4906)
GasGuzzler wrote:
I got ur PM about YAP. I signed up and started pushing Mr Victor Danilchenko's buttons on some "climate related weather" stuff. Half a dozen posts and he's backed into a corner and has suddenly gone MIA. (he was responding within about 2 minutes)
I did not get banned though....congrats on that!!

I'd like to thank you for that. You got Victor and mostomotus both to respond in their typical fashion and I came in right behind and sniped.

Predictably, Victor dismissed your questions while calling you a "troll". You left me great rhetorical ammunition. Please take a read at my responses when you get a chance. I can't tell you whether I'm being banned there right now or not.


.


Global Warming: The preferred religion of the scientifically illiterate.

Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit

When the alt-physics birds sing about "indivisible bodies," we've got pure BS. - VernerHornung

Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist




Join the debate Libertarians will Love what Trump did Today:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Trump Skips another Climate Change Meeting With World Leaders...8614-10-2019 20:42
Trump is Required to Help Zelenskyy1911-10-2019 21:28
Trump Sued Over New Coal Rules014-08-2019 02:37
Trump Friend Jeffrey Epstein316-07-2019 20:39
President Trump makes a personal sacrifice, for the country...211-07-2019 17:29
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2019 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact