Remember me
▼ Content

Is this one good enough?



Page 2 of 2<12
12-10-2016 22:15
jwoodward48
★★★★☆
(1537)
Don't repeat - just link to it. A single valid explanation. Can you?

I'm not asking for a description of a law, such as one I could get from a book. I'm asking you to logically derive your statement from valid laws, etc.
12-10-2016 22:23
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(4910)
jwoodward48 wrote:
Don't repeat - just link to it. A single valid explanation. Can you?

I'm not asking for a description of a law, such as one I could get from a book. I'm asking you to logically derive your statement from valid laws, etc.

I recommend you go back to the post to which you are responding and hit the "quote" button as opposed to the quick post option because you are responding to the post and not creating a new, independent thought.


.


Global Warming: The preferred religion of the scientifically illiterate.

Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit

When the alt-physics birds sing about "indivisible bodies," we've got pure BS. - VernerHornung

Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles

Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn

You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.

The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank

:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude

IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
12-10-2016 22:32
jwoodward48
★★★★☆
(1537)
Sure.
13-10-2016 18:46
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(4910)
... and ?
13-10-2016 19:32
jwoodward48
★★★★☆
(1537)
IBdaMann wrote:
... and ?


Oops, should've quoted that. Heh.


"Heads on a science
Apart" - Coldplay, The Scientist

IBdaMann wrote:
No, science doesn't insist that, ergo I don't insist that.

I am the Ninja Scientist! Beware!
13-10-2016 19:35
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(4910)
No worries, I'll post it again.

... and ?
13-10-2016 20:08
jwoodward48
★★★★☆
(1537)
IBdaMann wrote:
No worries, I'll post it again.

... and ?


Wait, what? And... what?


"Heads on a science
Apart" - Coldplay, The Scientist

IBdaMann wrote:
No, science doesn't insist that, ergo I don't insist that.

I am the Ninja Scientist! Beware!
13-10-2016 20:31
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(4910)
How long should I wait?
13-10-2016 23:13
jwoodward48
★★★★☆
(1537)
For what?
Page 2 of 2<12





Join the debate Is this one good enough?:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Good beginner book827-08-2019 00:51
This doesn't sound good...129-05-2019 06:22
Carbon tax killed auto industry in Ontario. Good thing for China. So who paid them?120-04-2019 00:00
What makes IPCC thinks N2, O2, O3 are not as good at capturing and retaining heat than CO2 can?218-04-2019 20:57
Wind Turbines Look good but not worth it!231-03-2019 19:09
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2019 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact