Climate-Debate.com Discuss climate change
NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory
06-05-2022 18:26 |
Swan ★★★★★ (3952) |
Into the Night wrote:
Swan wrote:
duncan61 wrote: The point I make is the shuttle transported stuff to and from the ISS.You are claiming USA did not do it
The last shuttle launch was in 2011, after that NASA began using Russian rocket engines in their lift vehicles. Why? because the American engines were garbage death traps. So kid the one in denial is you not I
CIAO
No, they are not garbage death traps.
The shuttle was an aging system and was due to be retired. It had nothing to do with it's engines.
You are now denying your own argument. You mentioned a space program using engines made right here in the States, and new craft made right here in the States; now you deny you even mentioned it.
LOL the fact is that after 2011 the NASA began using RUSSIAN engines to launch with and there is nothing you can say or do to change reality.
Now go kiss your mother again
Edited on 06-05-2022 19:07 |
06-05-2022 20:53 |
Into the Night ★★★★★ (20748) |
Swan wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Swan wrote:
duncan61 wrote: The point I make is the shuttle transported stuff to and from the ISS.You are claiming USA did not do it
The last shuttle launch was in 2011, after that NASA began using Russian rocket engines in their lift vehicles. Why? because the American engines were garbage death traps. So kid the one in denial is you not I
CIAO
No, they are not garbage death traps.
The shuttle was an aging system and was due to be retired. It had nothing to do with it's engines.
You are now denying your own argument. You mentioned a space program using engines made right here in the States, and new craft made right here in the States; now you deny you even mentioned it.
LOL the fact is that after 2011 the NASA began using RUSSIAN engines to launch with and there is nothing you can say or do to change reality.
Now go kiss your mother again Paradox. Irrational. Which is it, dude?
The Parrot Killer
Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles
Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit
nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan
While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
06-05-2022 20:55 |
Swan ★★★★★ (3952) |
Into the Night wrote:
Swan wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Swan wrote:
duncan61 wrote: The point I make is the shuttle transported stuff to and from the ISS.You are claiming USA did not do it
The last shuttle launch was in 2011, after that NASA began using Russian rocket engines in their lift vehicles. Why? because the American engines were garbage death traps. So kid the one in denial is you not I
CIAO
No, they are not garbage death traps.
The shuttle was an aging system and was due to be retired. It had nothing to do with it's engines.
You are now denying your own argument. You mentioned a space program using engines made right here in the States, and new craft made right here in the States; now you deny you even mentioned it.
LOL the fact is that after 2011 the NASA began using RUSSIAN engines to launch with and there is nothing you can say or do to change reality.
Now go kiss your mother again Paradox. Irrational. Which is it, dude?
LOL the fact is that after 2011 the NASA began using RUSSIAN engines to launch with and there is nothing you can say or do to change reality.
Now go kiss your mother again |
Join the debate NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory:
Related content
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.