Remember me
▼ Content

It seems to me that you can easily take it only in some black desk


It seems to me that you can easily take it only in some black desk19-11-2021 07:57
Overli18
☆☆☆☆☆
(1)
Tell me which bank is better to take a loan from. The higher the rating, the harder it is to give? It seems to me that you can easily take it only in some black desk
26-11-2021 13:20
Grey18
☆☆☆☆☆
(1)
I, too, have long been interested in this issue, but so far I can't find anything decent. I will be glad if someone will tell us.
26-11-2021 19:56
HarveyH55Profile picture★★★★★
(4240)
Banks want you to stay in debt, and keep making interest payments (profit). They don't want you to pay promptly, because the get to collect late fees. They really hope that you will default, so they can take what you own, and keep everything you paid. Or, at the very least, renegotiate the terms, with a higher interest rate, and longer term. So, you screw it up worse, and go further in debt to them. They want you to take out more loans, from other affiliated banks, to catch up on interest payments, from previous loans.
03-12-2021 10:54
AkaRasty
☆☆☆☆☆
(1)
Yes, it is certainly possible to change life, and I have repeatedly been convinced of this by my own example and by the example of my friends. https://2captcha.com/ if you put it right and with your head, you will drastically change your income and life in general
02-04-2022 17:35
jijiji
☆☆☆☆☆
(1)
So now I'm thinking what would I come up with that started to have enough money. Otherwise, there are difficulties with this now. I think maybe I can find a side job, I started studying convert image to svg, do you think I can find a job in this area later?
02-04-2022 22:24
HarveyH55Profile picture★★★★★
(4240)
Great, spambots...
RE: Let's teach the SPAMBOTS how to DEBATE!03-04-2022 19:54
sealover
★★★☆☆
(803)
Let's teach the SPAMBOTS how to DEBATE!

HarveyH55 wrote:
Great, spambots...


Actually, SPAMBOTS could make an EXCELLENT CONTRIBUTION TO DEBATE;

SPAMBOT #1 always says: "No science. No argument. Science is not (anything). (random1) fallacy. (random2) fallacy. (random3) fallacy."

SPAMBOT #2 always says: "Why do you HATE SCIENCE? How do you know? You are not God. You are not king. You did not see it. You don't know ANYTHING. Nobody knows anything. It is not possible to know anything. You are a LIAR!"

SPAMBOT #3 always says: "Why do you HATE PLANTS? Why do you WANT TO KILL EVERYONE? Why do you love to burn kittens and torture puppies? Why are all you MARXISTS so effing EVIL? Why are you trying to terrify my grandkids while you steal everything we try to leave for them?"

Heck, that's just the first three.

SPAMBOTS could do all the "debating" we'll ever need for us!
RE: more climate-debate spambots03-04-2022 22:43
sealover
★★★☆☆
(803)
more climate-debate spambots

SPAMBOT #4 always says: "(chemical name1) is not a chemical. (oxyanion1) cannot be reduced. (chemical name2) is not a chemical. (oxyanion2) cannot be reduced. Acid is not base. Oxidation is not reduction. Heat is not energy. Reality is not a popularity contest."

SPAMBOT #5 always says: "Don't forget about that irrelevant unrelated issue! Just goes to show what their true intentions are. What does that word even MEAN anyway? Doesn't it sound stupid when it is mocked like this? Only a really stupid person could be fooled into thinking an obviously fake word like that has meaning in science. And we're talking UNAMBIGUOUS DEFINITIONS."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

sealover wrote:
Let's teach the SPAMBOTS how to DEBATE!

HarveyH55 wrote:
Great, spambots...


Actually, SPAMBOTS could make an EXCELLENT CONTRIBUTION TO DEBATE;

SPAMBOT #1 always says: "No science. No argument. Science is not (anything). (random1) fallacy. (random2) fallacy. (random3) fallacy."

SPAMBOT #2 always says: "Why do you HATE SCIENCE? How do you know? You are not God. You are not king. You did not see it. You don't know ANYTHING. Nobody knows anything. It is not possible to know anything. You are a LIAR!"

SPAMBOT #3 always says: "Why do you HATE PLANTS? Why do you WANT TO KILL EVERYONE? Why do you love to burn kittens and torture puppies? Why are all you MARXISTS so effing EVIL? Why are you trying to terrify my grandkids while you steal everything we try to leave for them?"

Heck, that's just the first three.

SPAMBOTS could do all the "debating" we'll ever need for us!
03-04-2022 23:10
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(18435)
sealover wrote:
more climate-debate spambots

SPAMBOT #4 always says: "(chemical name1) is not a chemical. (oxyanion1) cannot be reduced. (chemical name2) is not a chemical. (oxyanion2) cannot be reduced. Acid is not base. Oxidation is not reduction. Heat is not energy. Reality is not a popularity contest."

SPAMBOT #5 always says: "Don't forget about that irrelevant unrelated issue! Just goes to show what their true intentions are. What does that word even MEAN anyway? Doesn't it sound stupid when it is mocked like this? Only a really stupid person could be fooled into thinking an obviously fake word like that has meaning in science. And we're talking UNAMBIGUOUS DEFINITIONS."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

sealover wrote:
Let's teach the SPAMBOTS how to DEBATE!

HarveyH55 wrote:
Great, spambots...


Actually, SPAMBOTS could make an EXCELLENT CONTRIBUTION TO DEBATE;

SPAMBOT #1 always says: "No science. No argument. Science is not (anything). (random1) fallacy. (random2) fallacy. (random3) fallacy."

SPAMBOT #2 always says: "Why do you HATE SCIENCE? How do you know? You are not God. You are not king. You did not see it. You don't know ANYTHING. Nobody knows anything. It is not possible to know anything. You are a LIAR!"

SPAMBOT #3 always says: "Why do you HATE PLANTS? Why do you WANT TO KILL EVERYONE? Why do you love to burn kittens and torture puppies? Why are all you MARXISTS so effing EVIL? Why are you trying to terrify my grandkids while you steal everything we try to leave for them?"

Heck, that's just the first three.

SPAMBOTS could do all the "debating" we'll ever need for us!


Please be sure this sort of thing conforms to RFC8565, which describes the HTJP network protocol.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan




Join the debate It seems to me that you can easily take it only in some black desk:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
The rider on "a black horse." -Revelation 6:5.1421-05-2022 18:02
The Natural Foods That Easily Destroy Corona Virus COVID Are The Hot Spicy, Bitter523-11-2021 11:27
Everybody Can Obtain The New Trillion Dollar Crypto Coin whitepapers To Become Millionaire Easily406-11-2021 03:55
I Have Easily Defeated Casino Bookies And Become Millionaire In Less Than 100 Days2411-08-2021 17:49
Black Lives Matter Now Officially Represents Violent Lawlessness1327-07-2021 06:40
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact