Bill Nye, the science guy

keepit wrote:
Bill Nye showed a couple of maps on tv. One showed where the percentage of people wearing masks and social distancing was great and and where it was small. The other one showed where the percentage of people with covid was great and where it was small.
You guessed it! Where masks were worn the percentage of people getting covid was much smaller.
Don't get confused over statistics here. Bill Nye did the statistics. Who do you trust?

keepit wrote:
Bill Nye showed a couple of maps on tv.

keepit wrote:
One showed where the percentage of people wearing masks and social distancing was great and and where it was small.

keepit wrote:
The other one showed where the percentage of people with covid was great and where it was small.

keepit wrote:
You guessed it! Where masks were worn the percentage of people getting covid was much smaller.

keepit wrote:
Don't get confused over statistics here.

keepit wrote:
Bill Nye did the statistics.

keepit wrote:
Who do you trust?

IBdaMann wrote:

keepit wrote:
Bill Nye showed a couple of maps on tv. One showed where the percentage of people wearing masks and social distancing was great and and where it was small. The other one showed where the percentage of people with covid was great and where it was small.
You guessed it! Where masks were worn the percentage of people getting covid was much smaller.
Don't get confused over statistics here. Bill Nye did the statistics. Who do you trust?

Only scientifically illiterate morons allow themselves to be totally manipulated by Bill Lie's dishonesty.

.

keepit wrote:
Bill Nye showed a couple of maps on tv.

keepit wrote:
One showed where the percentage of people wearing masks and social distancing was great and and where it was small.

keepit wrote:
The other one showed where the percentage of people with covid was great and where it was small.

keepit wrote:
You guessed it! Where masks were worn the percentage of people getting covid was much smaller.

keepit wrote:
Don't get confused over statistics here.

keepit wrote:
Bill Nye did the statistics.

keepit wrote:
Who do you trust?

keepit wrote:
ITN and IBD,
I sure wouldn't use you guys as references.

keepit wrote:
ITN and IBD,
I sure wouldn't use you guys as references.

HarveyH55 wrote:
Isn't Bill Nye's resume a little light, with only a bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering?

What were the demographics of his two study groups? No masks =downtown NYC, mask-wears, downtown Corn Husk, Nebraska (population 26)?

keepit wrote:
gfm,
So, if Bill Nye isn't made a scientist,

keepit wrote:
what made you a scientist?

keepit wrote:
You did say you were a scientist a couple weeks ago.

gfm7175 wrote:

keepit wrote:
ITN and IBD,
I sure wouldn't use you guys as references.

I don't count?? Just them two are worth personally addressing??

Hmmmmm, guess I'm gonna have to up my game...

keepit wrote:
gfm,
So, if Bill Nye isn't made a scientist, what made you a scientist? You did say you were a scientist a couple weeks ago.

HarveyH55 wrote:
Which 'scientist' won more awards for they work, Al Gore, or Bill Nye?

Into the Night wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Which 'scientist' won more awards for they work, Al Gore, or Bill Nye?

Science isn't awards.

gfm7175 wrote:
I wonder how he figured all of that detailed information out...

tmiddles wrote:

gfm7175 wrote:
I wonder how he figured all of that detailed information out...

Always remember: Nothing can be known.

tmiddles wrote:
Except that there were millions of illegal votes (evidence pending).

keepit wrote:
Another thing Bill Nye pointed out about masks was this:

even though masks have .3 micron openings, just because a virion can barely sneak past the .3 micron hole there are layers of .3 micron holes and they aren't lined up with each other. In other words if the first layer misses the virion the second or third or fourth layer can capture the virion. Once captured the virion doesn't last very long before it becomes inactive.

keepit wrote:
And this experience with coffee has destroyed your common sense?

For exposures to infectious respiratory organisms, we are most concerned with the size and concentrations of aerosols generated during normal breathing, talking, coughing, and sneezing. One study found that particles from healthy subjects ranged from 0.09 to 3 mm particles. Concentrations ranged from 100 to 350 particles/L during normal breathing and 150 to 2000 particles/L during talking or coughing.19 Another showed concentrations ranging from 14 to greater than 3000 particles/L and an average particle size of 0.32mm.

The filters of most of these surgical masks will allow a large majority of wearer-generated particles to penetrate and will collect only a small percentage of airborne particles generated by infectious patients. Evenwhen equipped with filters demonstrating relatively high collection efficiency, 10% to 40% of particlesFig 1. Penetration (%) of latex spheres. (A) Dental Masks (A-C). (

Hospital masks (D-I).Oberg and Brosseau May 2008 279 will penetrate the face seal as a result of poor fit. For aerosols containing organisms with a low infectiousdose (eg, tuberculosis), this level of face seal leakage would not prevent a potentially infectious exposure during even a brief encounter with a patient generating
copious amounts of aerosol.21-23 The poor performance of dental masks is of particular concern, given dental surgeons' close proximity to patients and the high aerosol concentrations generated by dentalprocedures.24

None of the surgical masks we evaluated met the filter or fit performance criteria for respiratory protection devices. We conclude that surgical masks do not offer protection comparable with that of respiratory protective devices (and are not certified by NIOSH as such)

keepit wrote:Some more confused errors from Bill Lie that I gullibly soaked up like a sponge:

keepit wrote: even though masks have .3 micron openings,

keepit wrote: ... just because a virion can barely sneak past the .3 micron hole

keepit wrote: ... there are layers of .3 micron holes and they aren't lined up with each other.

keepit wrote:
ITN,
I affirm all those things. What's wrong with you.

tmiddles wrote:

gfm7175 wrote:
I wonder how he figured all of that detailed information out...

Always remember: Nothing can be known.

tmiddles wrote:
Except that there were millions of illegal votes (evidence pending).

keepit wrote:
Another thing Bill Nye pointed out about masks was this:

keepit wrote:
even though masks have .3 micron openings, just because a virion can barely sneak past the .3 micron hole there are layers of .3 micron holes and they aren't lined up with each other. In other words if the first layer misses the virion the second or third or fourth layer can capture the virion. Once captured the virion doesn't last very long before it becomes inactive.

keepit wrote:
And this experience with coffee has destroyed your common sense?

keepit wrote:
Don't forget that most of the virions are contained in droplets. It is the droplets that are stopped by the many molecular layers of the mask.

keepit wrote:
Then the liquid droplets containing the virions begin to evaporate and during this process and also because of time the virions become inactivated.

keepit wrote:
Some do sneak through but the masks do help.

keepit wrote:
Check Bill Nye's maps of mask wearing vs covid infection rates to see the proof in the pudding.

keepit wrote:
Google Bill Nye and Flowing Data

HarveyH55 wrote:
How come Bill Nye isn't one the White House Task Force, for well, anything?

HarveyH55 wrote:
Biden dozen seem interested either, but probably because of race and gender disqualifications. Bill Nye use to explain simplistic stuff to small minded children, who didn't know any better, on TV. He read a script. Right now, he's just reading a script, trying to tap in on all those small minded adults, who he indoctrinated, as children.

Into the Night wrote:

keepit wrote:
ITN,
I affirm all those things. What's wrong with you.

Liar.

You deny science. You deny the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics. You deny the Stefan-Boltzmann law.

You deny mathematics, specifically probability and statistical mathematics.

You deny history.
You deny the Constitution of the United States.
You deny the constitutions of the several States.
You deny direct evidence.
You deny logic.

IBdaMann wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

keepit wrote:
ITN,
I affirm all those things. What's wrong with you.

Liar.

You deny science. You deny the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics. You deny the Stefan-Boltzmann law.

You deny mathematics, specifically probability and statistical mathematics.

You deny history.
You deny the Constitution of the United States.
You deny the constitutions of the several States.
You deny direct evidence.
You deny logic.

I hate to nit-pick, but you omitted extending credit to keepit for successfully denying economics in its entirety. Few people throughout history have had the discipline necessary to mentally reject every fundamental principle of human nature. I think you owe keepit an apology.

.