What is the best linux app ever created?

Swan wrote:
Well Watson that one is easy, that would be partition magic that when run properly makes linux vanish as though it was never there in the first place.

He he he, do you know what she did, your cunting daughter?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16utD0RBBYA

So in all seriousness, if you are afflicted by linux, seek help from this guy

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Well Watson that one is easy, that would be partition magic that when run properly makes linux vanish as though it was never there in the first place.

He he he, do you know what she did, your cunting daughter?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16utD0RBBYA

So in all seriousness, if you are afflicted by linux, seek help from this guy

Partition magic is not a linux app.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Well Watson that one is easy, that would be partition magic that when run properly makes linux vanish as though it was never there in the first place.

He he he, do you know what she did, your cunting daughter?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16utD0RBBYA

So in all seriousness, if you are afflicted by linux, seek help from this guy

Partition magic is not a linux app.

Partition magic will recognize linux and make it disappear, so partition magic is the only linux app that works.

Next

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Well Watson that one is easy, that would be partition magic that when run properly makes linux vanish as though it was never there in the first place.

He he he, do you know what she did, your cunting daughter?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16utD0RBBYA

So in all seriousness, if you are afflicted by linux, seek help from this guy

Partition magic is not a linux app.

Partition magic will recognize linux and make it disappear, so partition magic is the only linux app that works.

Next

Partition magic is not a linux app.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Well Watson that one is easy, that would be partition magic that when run properly makes linux vanish as though it was never there in the first place.

He he he, do you know what she did, your cunting daughter?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16utD0RBBYA

So in all seriousness, if you are afflicted by linux, seek help from this guy

Partition magic is not a linux app.

Partition magic will recognize linux and make it disappear, so partition magic is the only linux app that works.

Next

Partition magic is not a linux app.

Partition magic will recognize linux and make it disappear, so partition magic is the best app ever designed to deal with linux.

You may now continue fingerpainting

Next

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Well Watson that one is easy, that would be partition magic that when run properly makes linux vanish as though it was never there in the first place.

He he he, do you know what she did, your cunting daughter?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16utD0RBBYA

So in all seriousness, if you are afflicted by linux, seek help from this guy

Partition magic is not a linux app.

Partition magic will recognize linux and make it disappear, so partition magic is the only linux app that works.

Next

Partition magic is not a linux app.

Partition magic will recognize linux and make it disappear, so partition magic is the best app ever designed to deal with linux.

You may now continue fingerpainting

Next

Partition magic is not a linux app and it doesn't recognize linux. Apparently you don't know what a partition is either.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Well Watson that one is easy, that would be partition magic that when run properly makes linux vanish as though it was never there in the first place.

He he he, do you know what she did, your cunting daughter?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16utD0RBBYA

So in all seriousness, if you are afflicted by linux, seek help from this guy

Partition magic is not a linux app.

Partition magic will recognize linux and make it disappear, so partition magic is the only linux app that works.

Next

Partition magic is not a linux app.

Partition magic will recognize linux and make it disappear, so partition magic is the best app ever designed to deal with linux.

You may now continue fingerpainting

Next

Partition magic is not a linux app and it doesn't recognize linux. Apparently you don't know what a partition is either.

I tried to format my linux drive using windows,

Swan wrote:
but windows cannot even see linux,

Swan wrote:
so I downloaded partition magic and formatted the drive, then formatted the drive again to FAT32 and walla, windows found the printer that linux said was unsupported.

Swan wrote:PS. You really ought to lay off the meth.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Well Watson that one is easy, that would be partition magic that when run properly makes linux vanish as though it was never there in the first place.

He he he, do you know what she did, your cunting daughter?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16utD0RBBYA

So in all seriousness, if you are afflicted by linux, seek help from this guy

Partition magic is not a linux app.

Partition magic will recognize linux and make it disappear, so partition magic is the only linux app that works.

Next

Partition magic is not a linux app.

Partition magic will recognize linux and make it disappear, so partition magic is the best app ever designed to deal with linux.

You may now continue fingerpainting

Next

Partition magic is not a linux app and it doesn't recognize linux. Apparently you don't know what a partition is either.

I tried to format my linux drive using windows,

Windows cannot format a linux drive and has no knowledge of linux file systems.

Swan wrote:
but windows cannot even see linux,

So? Were you expecting it to?

Swan wrote:
so I downloaded partition magic and formatted the drive, then formatted the drive again to FAT32 and walla, windows found the printer that linux said was unsupported.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! So you formatted your drive to FAT32????!? That's ancient, dude!

Swan wrote:PS. You really ought to lay off the meth.

I don't do drugs, dumbass.

Swan wrote:
Haven't ...

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Haven't ...

16b...17.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Haven't ...

16b...17.

I bet ...

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Haven't ...

16b...17.

I bet ...

40a.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Haven't ...

16b...17.

I bet ...

40a.

Is that ...

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Haven't ...

16b...17.

I bet ...

40a.

Is that ...

40a.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Haven't ...

16b...17.

I bet ...

40a.

Is that ...

40a.

I tried ...

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:
Haven't ...

16b...17.

I bet ...

40a.

Is that ...

40a.

I tried ...

40a.

HarveyH55 wrote:
Why would Windows need to recognize Linux? Format doesn't care what was on the drive, or previous format. It only needs to recognize the drive, and capacity. If you are running Windows, it would find your printer if connected. Doesn't matter if Linux is on a separate drive or partition. Hardware isn't OS dependent, other than needing a driver. Pretty damn stupid, if you were running Windows, and Linux on the same computer. You could have still used the printer, without removing Linux. Likely could have passed most anything you wanted to print from Linux, over to Windows. Oh, that's right... You only have a 130 IQ, must be hard for you sometimes.

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Why would Windows need to recognize Linux? Format doesn't care what was on the drive, or previous format. It only needs to recognize the drive, and capacity. If you are running Windows, it would find your printer if connected. Doesn't matter if Linux is on a separate drive or partition. Hardware isn't OS dependent, other than needing a driver. Pretty damn stupid, if you were running Windows, and Linux on the same computer. You could have still used the printer, without removing Linux. Likely could have passed most anything you wanted to print from Linux, over to Windows. Oh, that's right... You only have a 130 IQ, must be hard for you sometimes.

See there you go again playing dumb as you try to secure information as lawyers do. So as I said windows needs to see a drive in order to install on that drive, and if the drive is formatted as EXT or some version of such then windows will return an error such as insufficient disk space to install windows, or dumbass linux user in chair. So kid you have just admitted that even for a lawyer that you are ignorant. Now this may still be true or not, but at the time that I played with ubuntu this was the case. This is what makes me, well me, and you and overeducated peeler.

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Why would Windows need to recognize Linux? Format doesn't care what was on the drive, or previous format. It only needs to recognize the drive, and capacity. If you are running Windows, it would find your printer if connected. Doesn't matter if Linux is on a separate drive or partition. Hardware isn't OS dependent, other than needing a driver. Pretty damn stupid, if you were running Windows, and Linux on the same computer. You could have still used the printer, without removing Linux. Likely could have passed most anything you wanted to print from Linux, over to Windows. Oh, that's right... You only have a 130 IQ, must be hard for you sometimes.

See there you go again playing dumb as you try to secure information as lawyers do. So as I said windows needs to see a drive in order to install on that drive, and if the drive is formatted as EXT or some version of such then windows will return an error such as insufficient disk space to install windows, or dumbass linux user in chair. So kid you have just admitted that even for a lawyer that you are ignorant. Now this may still be true or not, but at the time that I played with ubuntu this was the case. This is what makes me, well me, and you and overeducated peeler.

You are back-pedaling, and still losing. Format doesn't care about what's on the disk, it only needs to recognize and talk to the drive's controller. You said previously that you installed Linux on a spare drive. Should have been no need to re-install Windows. Caught a lie, or just another case of where you don't understand what you are talking about. If you didn't have Windows, it would still boot to a DOS command line prompt.

Either way, pretty stupid to remove Windows, just to try out Linux. When you only needed a separate drive or partition. I would have just used an old computer to experiment on, not fukk with a computer I use for other things. I'd stick to the minimal user interface, instead of one of the graphical user interfaces, since there wouldn't be a lot of applications. Not really into operating systems on a daily basis. The command line doesn't scare me.

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Why would Windows need to recognize Linux? Format doesn't care what was on the drive, or previous format. It only needs to recognize the drive, and capacity. If you are running Windows, it would find your printer if connected. Doesn't matter if Linux is on a separate drive or partition. Hardware isn't OS dependent, other than needing a driver. Pretty damn stupid, if you were running Windows, and Linux on the same computer. You could have still used the printer, without removing Linux. Likely could have passed most anything you wanted to print from Linux, over to Windows. Oh, that's right... You only have a 130 IQ, must be hard for you sometimes.

See there you go again playing dumb as you try to secure information as lawyers do. So as I said windows needs to see a drive in order to install on that drive, and if the drive is formatted as EXT or some version of such then windows will return an error such as insufficient disk space to install windows, or dumbass linux user in chair. So kid you have just admitted that even for a lawyer that you are ignorant. Now this may still be true or not, but at the time that I played with ubuntu this was the case. This is what makes me, well me, and you and overeducated peeler.

You are back-pedaling, and still losing. Format doesn't care about what's on the disk, it only needs to recognize and talk to the drive's controller. You said previously that you installed Linux on a spare drive. Should have been no need to re-install Windows. Caught a lie, or just another case of where you don't understand what you are talking about. If you didn't have Windows, it would still boot to a DOS command line prompt.

Either way, pretty stupid to remove Windows, just to try out Linux. When you only needed a separate drive or partition. I would have just used an old computer to experiment on, not fukk with a computer I use for other things. I'd stick to the minimal user interface, instead of one of the graphical user interfaces, since there wouldn't be a lot of applications. Not really into operating systems on a daily basis. The command line doesn't scare me.

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Why would Windows need to recognize Linux? Format doesn't care what was on the drive, or previous format. It only needs to recognize the drive, and capacity. If you are running Windows, it would find your printer if connected. Doesn't matter if Linux is on a separate drive or partition. Hardware isn't OS dependent, other than needing a driver. Pretty damn stupid, if you were running Windows, and Linux on the same computer. You could have still used the printer, without removing Linux. Likely could have passed most anything you wanted to print from Linux, over to Windows. Oh, that's right... You only have a 130 IQ, must be hard for you sometimes.

See there you go again playing dumb as you try to secure information as lawyers do. So as I said windows needs to see a drive in order to install on that drive, and if the drive is formatted as EXT or some version of such then windows will return an error such as insufficient disk space to install windows, or dumbass linux user in chair. So kid you have just admitted that even for a lawyer that you are ignorant. Now this may still be true or not, but at the time that I played with ubuntu this was the case. This is what makes me, well me, and you and overeducated peeler.

You are back-pedaling, and still losing. Format doesn't care about what's on the disk, it only needs to recognize and talk to the drive's controller. You said previously that you installed Linux on a spare drive. Should have been no need to re-install Windows. Caught a lie, or just another case of where you don't understand what you are talking about. If you didn't have Windows, it would still boot to a DOS command line prompt.

Either way, pretty stupid to remove Windows, just to try out Linux. When you only needed a separate drive or partition. I would have just used an old computer to experiment on, not fukk with a computer I use for other things. I'd stick to the minimal user interface, instead of one of the graphical user interfaces, since there wouldn't be a lot of applications. Not really into operating systems on a daily basis. The command line doesn't scare me.

Wrong again little girl, because at least at the time windows could not even see a linux drive, and as such could not format a linux partition. Not sure if this is still true because i no longer waste my time with linux like you do.

If you're dual-booting Windows and Linux, you'll probably want to access files on your Linux system from Windows at some point. Linux has built-in support for Windows NTFS partitions, but Windows can't usually read Linux partitions without third-party software. We've rounded up some third-party software to help. The third party software that I chose to use was partition magic.

The dumb lawyer strikes again

PS. What did I lose by the way?

Market Summary
>
Apple Inc
195.83 USD
+143.83 (276.60%)past 5 years
Closed: Jul 28, 7:59 PM EDT * Disclaimer
After hours 195.89 +0.060 (0.031%)

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Why would Windows need to recognize Linux? Format doesn't care what was on the drive, or previous format. It only needs to recognize the drive, and capacity. If you are running Windows, it would find your printer if connected. Doesn't matter if Linux is on a separate drive or partition. Hardware isn't OS dependent, other than needing a driver. Pretty damn stupid, if you were running Windows, and Linux on the same computer. You could have still used the printer, without removing Linux. Likely could have passed most anything you wanted to print from Linux, over to Windows. Oh, that's right... You only have a 130 IQ, must be hard for you sometimes.

See there you go again playing dumb as you try to secure information as lawyers do. So as I said windows needs to see a drive in order to install on that drive, and if the drive is formatted as EXT or some version of such then windows will return an error such as insufficient disk space to install windows, or dumbass linux user in chair. So kid you have just admitted that even for a lawyer that you are ignorant. Now this may still be true or not, but at the time that I played with ubuntu this was the case. This is what makes me, well me, and you and overeducated peeler.

You are back-pedaling, and still losing. Format doesn't care about what's on the disk, it only needs to recognize and talk to the drive's controller. You said previously that you installed Linux on a spare drive. Should have been no need to re-install Windows. Caught a lie, or just another case of where you don't understand what you are talking about. If you didn't have Windows, it would still boot to a DOS command line prompt.

Either way, pretty stupid to remove Windows, just to try out Linux. When you only needed a separate drive or partition. I would have just used an old computer to experiment on, not fukk with a computer I use for other things. I'd stick to the minimal user interface, instead of one of the graphical user interfaces, since there wouldn't be a lot of applications. Not really into operating systems on a daily basis. The command line doesn't scare me.

Wrong again little girl, because at least at the time windows could not even see a linux drive, and as such could not format a linux partition. Not sure if this is still true because i no longer waste my time with linux like you do.

If you're dual-booting Windows and Linux, you'll probably want to access files on your Linux system from Windows at some point. Linux has built-in support for Windows NTFS partitions, but Windows can't usually read Linux partitions without third-party software. We've rounded up some third-party software to help. The third party software that I chose to use was partition magic.

The dumb lawyer strikes again

PS. What did I lose by the way?

Market Summary
>
Apple Inc
195.83 USD
+143.83 (276.60%)past 5 years
Closed: Jul 28, 7:59 PM EDT * Disclaimer
After hours 195.89 +0.060 (0.031%)

Partition magic does not read linux drives.

You are caught lying AGAIN. You said you installed Linux on a spare drive, not dual booting Linux and Windows.

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Why would Windows need to recognize Linux? Format doesn't care what was on the drive, or previous format. It only needs to recognize the drive, and capacity. If you are running Windows, it would find your printer if connected. Doesn't matter if Linux is on a separate drive or partition. Hardware isn't OS dependent, other than needing a driver. Pretty damn stupid, if you were running Windows, and Linux on the same computer. You could have still used the printer, without removing Linux. Likely could have passed most anything you wanted to print from Linux, over to Windows. Oh, that's right... You only have a 130 IQ, must be hard for you sometimes.

See there you go again playing dumb as you try to secure information as lawyers do. So as I said windows needs to see a drive in order to install on that drive, and if the drive is formatted as EXT or some version of such then windows will return an error such as insufficient disk space to install windows, or dumbass linux user in chair. So kid you have just admitted that even for a lawyer that you are ignorant. Now this may still be true or not, but at the time that I played with ubuntu this was the case. This is what makes me, well me, and you and overeducated peeler.

You are back-pedaling, and still losing. Format doesn't care about what's on the disk, it only needs to recognize and talk to the drive's controller. You said previously that you installed Linux on a spare drive. Should have been no need to re-install Windows. Caught a lie, or just another case of where you don't understand what you are talking about. If you didn't have Windows, it would still boot to a DOS command line prompt.

Either way, pretty stupid to remove Windows, just to try out Linux. When you only needed a separate drive or partition. I would have just used an old computer to experiment on, not fukk with a computer I use for other things. I'd stick to the minimal user interface, instead of one of the graphical user interfaces, since there wouldn't be a lot of applications. Not really into operating systems on a daily basis. The command line doesn't scare me.

Wrong again little girl, because at least at the time windows could not even see a linux drive, and as such could not format a linux partition. Not sure if this is still true because i no longer waste my time with linux like you do.

If you're dual-booting Windows and Linux, you'll probably want to access files on your Linux system from Windows at some point. Linux has built-in support for Windows NTFS partitions, but Windows can't usually read Linux partitions without third-party software. We've rounded up some third-party software to help. The third party software that I chose to use was partition magic.

The dumb lawyer strikes again

PS. What did I lose by the way?

Market Summary
>
Apple Inc
195.83 USD
+143.83 (276.60%)past 5 years
Closed: Jul 28, 7:59 PM EDT * Disclaimer
After hours 195.89 +0.060 (0.031%)

Partition magic does not read linux drives.

You are caught lying AGAIN. You said you installed Linux on a spare drive, not dual booting Linux and Windows.

I never said that partition magic read linux, but it can and did make it vanish, like your IQ vanished long ago.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Why would Windows need to recognize Linux? Format doesn't care what was on the drive, or previous format. It only needs to recognize the drive, and capacity. If you are running Windows, it would find your printer if connected. Doesn't matter if Linux is on a separate drive or partition. Hardware isn't OS dependent, other than needing a driver. Pretty damn stupid, if you were running Windows, and Linux on the same computer. You could have still used the printer, without removing Linux. Likely could have passed most anything you wanted to print from Linux, over to Windows. Oh, that's right... You only have a 130 IQ, must be hard for you sometimes.

See there you go again playing dumb as you try to secure information as lawyers do. So as I said windows needs to see a drive in order to install on that drive, and if the drive is formatted as EXT or some version of such then windows will return an error such as insufficient disk space to install windows, or dumbass linux user in chair. So kid you have just admitted that even for a lawyer that you are ignorant. Now this may still be true or not, but at the time that I played with ubuntu this was the case. This is what makes me, well me, and you and overeducated peeler.

You are back-pedaling, and still losing. Format doesn't care about what's on the disk, it only needs to recognize and talk to the drive's controller. You said previously that you installed Linux on a spare drive. Should have been no need to re-install Windows. Caught a lie, or just another case of where you don't understand what you are talking about. If you didn't have Windows, it would still boot to a DOS command line prompt.

Either way, pretty stupid to remove Windows, just to try out Linux. When you only needed a separate drive or partition. I would have just used an old computer to experiment on, not fukk with a computer I use for other things. I'd stick to the minimal user interface, instead of one of the graphical user interfaces, since there wouldn't be a lot of applications. Not really into operating systems on a daily basis. The command line doesn't scare me.

Wrong again little girl, because at least at the time windows could not even see a linux drive, and as such could not format a linux partition. Not sure if this is still true because i no longer waste my time with linux like you do.

If you're dual-booting Windows and Linux, you'll probably want to access files on your Linux system from Windows at some point. Linux has built-in support for Windows NTFS partitions, but Windows can't usually read Linux partitions without third-party software. We've rounded up some third-party software to help. The third party software that I chose to use was partition magic.

The dumb lawyer strikes again

PS. What did I lose by the way?

Market Summary
>
Apple Inc
195.83 USD
+143.83 (276.60%)past 5 years
Closed: Jul 28, 7:59 PM EDT * Disclaimer
After hours 195.89 +0.060 (0.031%)

Partition magic does not read linux drives.

You are caught lying AGAIN. You said you installed Linux on a spare drive, not dual booting Linux and Windows.

I never said that partition magic read linux, but it can and did make it vanish, like your IQ vanished long ago.

Another lie. Paradox. Irrational.

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Why would Windows need to recognize Linux? Format doesn't care what was on the drive, or previous format. It only needs to recognize the drive, and capacity. If you are running Windows, it would find your printer if connected. Doesn't matter if Linux is on a separate drive or partition. Hardware isn't OS dependent, other than needing a driver. Pretty damn stupid, if you were running Windows, and Linux on the same computer. You could have still used the printer, without removing Linux. Likely could have passed most anything you wanted to print from Linux, over to Windows. Oh, that's right... You only have a 130 IQ, must be hard for you sometimes.

See there you go again playing dumb as you try to secure information as lawyers do. So as I said windows needs to see a drive in order to install on that drive, and if the drive is formatted as EXT or some version of such then windows will return an error such as insufficient disk space to install windows, or dumbass linux user in chair. So kid you have just admitted that even for a lawyer that you are ignorant. Now this may still be true or not, but at the time that I played with ubuntu this was the case. This is what makes me, well me, and you and overeducated peeler.

You are back-pedaling, and still losing. Format doesn't care about what's on the disk, it only needs to recognize and talk to the drive's controller. You said previously that you installed Linux on a spare drive. Should have been no need to re-install Windows. Caught a lie, or just another case of where you don't understand what you are talking about. If you didn't have Windows, it would still boot to a DOS command line prompt.

Either way, pretty stupid to remove Windows, just to try out Linux. When you only needed a separate drive or partition. I would have just used an old computer to experiment on, not fukk with a computer I use for other things. I'd stick to the minimal user interface, instead of one of the graphical user interfaces, since there wouldn't be a lot of applications. Not really into operating systems on a daily basis. The command line doesn't scare me.

Wrong again little girl, because at least at the time windows could not even see a linux drive, and as such could not format a linux partition. Not sure if this is still true because i no longer waste my time with linux like you do.

If you're dual-booting Windows and Linux, you'll probably want to access files on your Linux system from Windows at some point. Linux has built-in support for Windows NTFS partitions, but Windows can't usually read Linux partitions without third-party software. We've rounded up some third-party software to help. The third party software that I chose to use was partition magic.

The dumb lawyer strikes again

PS. What did I lose by the way?

Market Summary
>
Apple Inc
195.83 USD
+143.83 (276.60%)past 5 years
Closed: Jul 28, 7:59 PM EDT * Disclaimer
After hours 195.89 +0.060 (0.031%)

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Why would Windows need to recognize Linux? Format doesn't care what was on the drive, or previous format. It only needs to recognize the drive, and capacity. If you are running Windows, it would find your printer if connected. Doesn't matter if Linux is on a separate drive or partition. Hardware isn't OS dependent, other than needing a driver. Pretty damn stupid, if you were running Windows, and Linux on the same computer. You could have still used the printer, without removing Linux. Likely could have passed most anything you wanted to print from Linux, over to Windows. Oh, that's right... You only have a 130 IQ, must be hard for you sometimes.

See there you go again playing dumb as you try to secure information as lawyers do. So as I said windows needs to see a drive in order to install on that drive, and if the drive is formatted as EXT or some version of such then windows will return an error such as insufficient disk space to install windows, or dumbass linux user in chair. So kid you have just admitted that even for a lawyer that you are ignorant. Now this may still be true or not, but at the time that I played with ubuntu this was the case. This is what makes me, well me, and you and overeducated peeler.

You are back-pedaling, and still losing. Format doesn't care about what's on the disk, it only needs to recognize and talk to the drive's controller. You said previously that you installed Linux on a spare drive. Should have been no need to re-install Windows. Caught a lie, or just another case of where you don't understand what you are talking about. If you didn't have Windows, it would still boot to a DOS command line prompt.

Either way, pretty stupid to remove Windows, just to try out Linux. When you only needed a separate drive or partition. I would have just used an old computer to experiment on, not fukk with a computer I use for other things. I'd stick to the minimal user interface, instead of one of the graphical user interfaces, since there wouldn't be a lot of applications. Not really into operating systems on a daily basis. The command line doesn't scare me.

Wrong again little girl, because at least at the time windows could not even see a linux drive, and as such could not format a linux partition. Not sure if this is still true because i no longer waste my time with linux like you do.

If you're dual-booting Windows and Linux, you'll probably want to access files on your Linux system from Windows at some point. Linux has built-in support for Windows NTFS partitions, but Windows can't usually read Linux partitions without third-party software. We've rounded up some third-party software to help. The third party software that I chose to use was partition magic.

The dumb lawyer strikes again

PS. What did I lose by the way?

Market Summary
>
Apple Inc
195.83 USD
+143.83 (276.60%)past 5 years
Closed: Jul 28, 7:59 PM EDT * Disclaimer
After hours 195.89 +0.060 (0.031%)

Partition magic does not read linux drives.

You are caught lying AGAIN. You said you installed Linux on a spare drive, not dual booting Linux and Windows.

I never said that partition magic read linux, but it can and did make it vanish, like your IQ vanished long ago.

Another lie. Paradox. Irrational.

Well ...

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Why would Windows need to recognize Linux? Format doesn't care what was on the drive, or previous format. It only needs to recognize the drive, and capacity. If you are running Windows, it would find your printer if connected. Doesn't matter if Linux is on a separate drive or partition. Hardware isn't OS dependent, other than needing a driver. Pretty damn stupid, if you were running Windows, and Linux on the same computer. You could have still used the printer, without removing Linux. Likely could have passed most anything you wanted to print from Linux, over to Windows. Oh, that's right... You only have a 130 IQ, must be hard for you sometimes.

See there you go again playing dumb as you try to secure information as lawyers do. So as I said windows needs to see a drive in order to install on that drive, and if the drive is formatted as EXT or some version of such then windows will return an error such as insufficient disk space to install windows, or dumbass linux user in chair. So kid you have just admitted that even for a lawyer that you are ignorant. Now this may still be true or not, but at the time that I played with ubuntu this was the case. This is what makes me, well me, and you and overeducated peeler.

You are back-pedaling, and still losing. Format doesn't care about what's on the disk, it only needs to recognize and talk to the drive's controller. You said previously that you installed Linux on a spare drive. Should have been no need to re-install Windows. Caught a lie, or just another case of where you don't understand what you are talking about. If you didn't have Windows, it would still boot to a DOS command line prompt.

Either way, pretty stupid to remove Windows, just to try out Linux. When you only needed a separate drive or partition. I would have just used an old computer to experiment on, not fukk with a computer I use for other things. I'd stick to the minimal user interface, instead of one of the graphical user interfaces, since there wouldn't be a lot of applications. Not really into operating systems on a daily basis. The command line doesn't scare me.

Wrong again little girl, because at least at the time windows could not even see a linux drive, and as such could not format a linux partition. Not sure if this is still true because i no longer waste my time with linux like you do.

If you're dual-booting Windows and Linux, you'll probably want to access files on your Linux system from Windows at some point. Linux has built-in support for Windows NTFS partitions, but Windows can't usually read Linux partitions without third-party software. We've rounded up some third-party software to help. The third party software that I chose to use was partition magic.

The dumb lawyer strikes again

PS. What did I lose by the way?

Market Summary
>
Apple Inc
195.83 USD
+143.83 (276.60%)past 5 years
Closed: Jul 28, 7:59 PM EDT * Disclaimer
After hours 195.89 +0.060 (0.031%)

What you lost, was another attempt at lying your way out, of another lie, you seemed to think would make you appear as something you clear aren't, and never will be.

You already had the tools to do the format, if you had ever bothered to learn anything about computers. Same tools that were on computers, before Windows even existed. Comes standard, since you need them to prepare, before installing Windows, on a new computer, or replacing a failed Windows boot drive. You Google-searched for the clueless-moron option to fix your fukk-up. You probably fukked-up the Linux install, or could figure out how to use what you install, because you have only used store bought computers, you just had to plug in. You call customer service, every time you get stuck, or something doesn't go as fantasized. Probably got transferred quite a bit, lot of time on 'hold', hang-ups, because the hate dealing with clueless azzholes like you.

Mostly, you are the poster-child for losers, who lie, trying to spin their stupidity into victim-hood, or something that makes you appear average, or better. Your lies are just as stupid as your silly problems, and not many would believe, just entertained, briefly.

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Why would Windows need to recognize Linux? Format doesn't care what was on the drive, or previous format. It only needs to recognize the drive, and capacity. If you are running Windows, it would find your printer if connected. Doesn't matter if Linux is on a separate drive or partition. Hardware isn't OS dependent, other than needing a driver. Pretty damn stupid, if you were running Windows, and Linux on the same computer. You could have still used the printer, without removing Linux. Likely could have passed most anything you wanted to print from Linux, over to Windows. Oh, that's right... You only have a 130 IQ, must be hard for you sometimes.

See there you go again playing dumb as you try to secure information as lawyers do. So as I said windows needs to see a drive in order to install on that drive, and if the drive is formatted as EXT or some version of such then windows will return an error such as insufficient disk space to install windows, or dumbass linux user in chair. So kid you have just admitted that even for a lawyer that you are ignorant. Now this may still be true or not, but at the time that I played with ubuntu this was the case. This is what makes me, well me, and you and overeducated peeler.

You are back-pedaling, and still losing. Format doesn't care about what's on the disk, it only needs to recognize and talk to the drive's controller. You said previously that you installed Linux on a spare drive. Should have been no need to re-install Windows. Caught a lie, or just another case of where you don't understand what you are talking about. If you didn't have Windows, it would still boot to a DOS command line prompt.

Either way, pretty stupid to remove Windows, just to try out Linux. When you only needed a separate drive or partition. I would have just used an old computer to experiment on, not fukk with a computer I use for other things. I'd stick to the minimal user interface, instead of one of the graphical user interfaces, since there wouldn't be a lot of applications. Not really into operating systems on a daily basis. The command line doesn't scare me.

Wrong again little girl, because at least at the time windows could not even see a linux drive, and as such could not format a linux partition. Not sure if this is still true because i no longer waste my time with linux like you do.

If you're dual-booting Windows and Linux, you'll probably want to access files on your Linux system from Windows at some point. Linux has built-in support for Windows NTFS partitions, but Windows can't usually read Linux partitions without third-party software. We've rounded up some third-party software to help. The third party software that I chose to use was partition magic.

The dumb lawyer strikes again

PS. What did I lose by the way?

Market Summary
>
Apple Inc
195.83 USD
+143.83 (276.60%)past 5 years
Closed: Jul 28, 7:59 PM EDT * Disclaimer
After hours 195.89 +0.060 (0.031%)

What you lost, was another attempt at lying your way out, of another lie, you seemed to think would make you appear as something you clear aren't, and never will be.

You already had the tools to do the format, if you had ever bothered to learn anything about computers. Same tools that were on computers, before Windows even existed. Comes standard, since you need them to prepare, before installing Windows, on a new computer, or replacing a failed Windows boot drive. You Google-searched for the clueless-moron option to fix your fukk-up. You probably fukked-up the Linux install, or could figure out how to use what you install, because you have only used store bought computers, you just had to plug in. You call customer service, every time you get stuck, or something doesn't go as fantasized. Probably got transferred quite a bit, lot of time on 'hold', hang-ups, because the hate dealing with clueless azzholes like you.

Mostly, you are the poster-child for losers, who lie, trying to spin their stupidity into victim-hood, or something that makes you appear average, or better. Your lies are just as stupid as your silly problems, and not many would believe, just entertained, briefly.

HarveyH55 wrote:
Must really suck having to lie to yourself every day. Guessing your stepson joined the navy, to get away from your whining, and bullshit.

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Must really suck having to lie to yourself every day. Guessing your stepson joined the navy, to get away from your whining, and bullshit.

So what is it like knowing that you are owned?

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Must really suck having to lie to yourself every day. Guessing your stepson joined the navy, to get away from your whining, and bullshit.

So what is it like knowing that you are owned?

By a broken down old fool, who thinks 15 years ago, was yesterday? Dream on, moron...

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Why would Windows need to recognize Linux? Format doesn't care what was on the drive, or previous format. It only needs to recognize the drive, and capacity. If you are running Windows, it would find your printer if connected. Doesn't matter if Linux is on a separate drive or partition. Hardware isn't OS dependent, other than needing a driver. Pretty damn stupid, if you were running Windows, and Linux on the same computer. You could have still used the printer, without removing Linux. Likely could have passed most anything you wanted to print from Linux, over to Windows. Oh, that's right... You only have a 130 IQ, must be hard for you sometimes.

See there you go again playing dumb as you try to secure information as lawyers do. So as I said windows needs to see a drive in order to install on that drive, and if the drive is formatted as EXT or some version of such then windows will return an error such as insufficient disk space to install windows, or dumbass linux user in chair. So kid you have just admitted that even for a lawyer that you are ignorant. Now this may still be true or not, but at the time that I played with ubuntu this was the case. This is what makes me, well me, and you and overeducated peeler.

You are back-pedaling, and still losing. Format doesn't care about what's on the disk, it only needs to recognize and talk to the drive's controller. You said previously that you installed Linux on a spare drive. Should have been no need to re-install Windows. Caught a lie, or just another case of where you don't understand what you are talking about. If you didn't have Windows, it would still boot to a DOS command line prompt.

Either way, pretty stupid to remove Windows, just to try out Linux. When you only needed a separate drive or partition. I would have just used an old computer to experiment on, not fukk with a computer I use for other things. I'd stick to the minimal user interface, instead of one of the graphical user interfaces, since there wouldn't be a lot of applications. Not really into operating systems on a daily basis. The command line doesn't scare me.

Wrong again little girl, because at least at the time windows could not even see a linux drive, and as such could not format a linux partition. Not sure if this is still true because i no longer waste my time with linux like you do.

If you're dual-booting Windows and Linux, you'll probably want to access files on your Linux system from Windows at some point. Linux has built-in support for Windows NTFS partitions, but Windows can't usually read Linux partitions without third-party software. We've rounded up some third-party software to help. The third party software that I chose to use was partition magic.

The dumb lawyer strikes again

PS. What did I lose by the way?

Market Summary
>
Apple Inc
195.83 USD
+143.83 (276.60%)past 5 years
Closed: Jul 28, 7:59 PM EDT * Disclaimer
After hours 195.89 +0.060 (0.031%)

What you lost, was another attempt at lying your way out, of another lie, you seemed to think would make you appear as something you clear aren't, and never will be.

You already had the tools to do the format, if you had ever bothered to learn anything about computers. Same tools that were on computers, before Windows even existed. Comes standard, since you need them to prepare, before installing Windows, on a new computer, or replacing a failed Windows boot drive. You Google-searched for the clueless-moron option to fix your fukk-up. You probably fukked-up the Linux install, or could figure out how to use what you install, because you have only used store bought computers, you just had to plug in. You call customer service, every time you get stuck, or something doesn't go as fantasized. Probably got transferred quite a bit, lot of time on 'hold', hang-ups, because the hate dealing with clueless azzholes like you.

Mostly, you are the poster-child for losers, who lie, trying to spin their stupidity into victim-hood, or something that makes you appear average, or better. Your lies are just as stupid as your silly problems, and not many would believe, just entertained, briefly.

Actually ubuntu was working perfectly, until I decided that I needed my new HP printer. So I informed the ubintu board where they quickly and openly told me to get a supported printer. Then I informed them how badly their market share would fall if no one could use an HP printer. Since I was correct they banned me, and I giggled.

HarveyH55 wrote:
Must really suck having to lie to yourself every day. Guessing your stepson joined the navy, to get away from your whining, and bullshit.

Into the Night wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

Swan wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Why would Windows need to recognize Linux? Format doesn't care what was on the drive, or previous format. It only needs to recognize the drive, and capacity. If you are running Windows, it would find your printer if connected. Doesn't matter if Linux is on a separate drive or partition. Hardware isn't OS dependent, other than needing a driver. Pretty damn stupid, if you were running Windows, and Linux on the same computer. You could have still used the printer, without removing Linux. Likely could have passed most anything you wanted to print from Linux, over to Windows. Oh, that's right... You only have a 130 IQ, must be hard for you sometimes.

See there you go again playing dumb as you try to secure information as lawyers do. So as I said windows needs to see a drive in order to install on that drive, and if the drive is formatted as EXT or some version of such then windows will return an error such as insufficient disk space to install windows, or dumbass linux user in chair. So kid you have just admitted that even for a lawyer that you are ignorant. Now this may still be true or not, but at the time that I played with ubuntu this was the case. This is what makes me, well me, and you and overeducated peeler.

You are back-pedaling, and still losing. Format doesn't care about what's on the disk, it only needs to recognize and talk to the drive's controller. You said previously that you installed Linux on a spare drive. Should have been no need to re-install Windows. Caught a lie, or just another case of where you don't understand what you are talking about. If you didn't have Windows, it would still boot to a DOS command line prompt.

Either way, pretty stupid to remove Windows, just to try out Linux. When you only needed a separate drive or partition. I would have just used an old computer to experiment on, not fukk with a computer I use for other things. I'd stick to the minimal user interface, instead of one of the graphical user interfaces, since there wouldn't be a lot of applications. Not really into operating systems on a daily basis. The command line doesn't scare me.

Wrong again little girl, because at least at the time windows could not even see a linux drive, and as such could not format a linux partition. Not sure if this is still true because i no longer waste my time with linux like you do.

If you're dual-booting Windows and Linux, you'll probably want to access files on your Linux system from Windows at some point. Linux has built-in support for Windows NTFS partitions, but Windows can't usually read Linux partitions without third-party software. We've rounded up some third-party software to help. The third party software that I chose to use was partition magic.

The dumb lawyer strikes again

PS. What did I lose by the way?

Market Summary
>
Apple Inc
195.83 USD
+143.83 (276.60%)past 5 years
Closed: Jul 28, 7:59 PM EDT * Disclaimer
After hours 195.89 +0.060 (0.031%)

What you lost, was another attempt at lying your way out, of another lie, you seemed to think would make you appear as something you clear aren't, and never will be.

You already had the tools to do the format, if you had ever bothered to learn anything about computers. Same tools that were on computers, before Windows even existed. Comes standard, since you need them to prepare, before installing Windows, on a new computer, or replacing a failed Windows boot drive. You Google-searched for the clueless-moron option to fix your fukk-up. You probably fukked-up the Linux install, or could figure out how to use what you install, because you have only used store bought computers, you just had to plug in. You call customer service, every time you get stuck, or something doesn't go as fantasized. Probably got transferred quite a bit, lot of time on 'hold', hang-ups, because the hate dealing with clueless azzholes like you.

Mostly, you are the poster-child for losers, who lie, trying to spin their stupidity into victim-hood, or something that makes you appear average, or better. Your lies are just as stupid as your silly problems, and not many would believe, just entertained, briefly.

Actually ubuntu was working perfectly, until I decided that I needed my new HP printer. So I informed the ubintu board where they quickly and openly told me to get a supported printer. Then I informed them how badly their market share would fall if no one could use an HP printer. Since I was correct they banned me, and I giggled.

Ubuntu works with HP printers, liar.

Into the Night wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
Must really suck having to lie to yourself every day. Guessing your stepson joined the navy, to get away from your whining, and bullshit.

Since he lies about pretty much anything, I doubt he has a stepson in the navy.

Swan wrote:
I bought a new printer that none of the ubuntu clowns had written a driver for.

Swan wrote:
Now one could also say that HP did not write a driver for ubuntu like they wrote for windows,

Swan wrote:
but why would they when ubuntu is only used by retards like you?

Swan wrote:
Furthermore, I ask the company directly for the driver and they told me to buy a supported ten year old obsolete printer like you use for printing porno