Remember me
▼ Content

Trump Spanks Global Warming



Page 2 of 2<12
30-06-2017 07:49
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
"don'T rump" disassembles science. The following events state what "don'T rump" is doing through-out the fed gov't.
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/06/scientist-tells-her-story-latest-partisan-battle-house-science-panel
Now "don'T rump" has its "sigh-ants".
Edited on 30-06-2017 07:56
30-06-2017 14:52
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
Article about "re-pubic-lick-un cruelty":
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/30/opinion/understanding-republican-cruelty.html?src=trending&module=Ribbon&version=context&region=Header&action=click&contentCollection=Trending&pgtype=article

From the article:
Republicans start from a sort of baseline of cruelty toward the less fortunate, of hostility toward anything that protects families against catastrophe.
In this sense there's nothing new about their health plan. What it does — punish the poor and working class, cut taxes on the rich — is what every major G.O.P. policy proposal does. The only difference is that this time it's all out in the open.
30-06-2017 22:33
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(22470)
litesong wrote:
Article about "re-pubic-lick-un cruelty":
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/30/opinion/understanding-republican-cruelty.html?src=trending&module=Ribbon&version=context&region=Header&action=click&contentCollection=Trending&pgtype=article

From the article:
Republicans start from a sort of baseline of cruelty toward the less fortunate, of hostility toward anything that protects families against catastrophe.
In this sense there's nothing new about their health plan. What it does — punish the poor and working class, cut taxes on the rich — is what every major G.O.P. policy proposal does. The only difference is that this time it's all out in the open.


Just like the Obama Health care plan did.

The thing needs to be abolished so the free market can work.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
01-07-2017 01:51
Wake
★★★★★
(4034)
Into the Night wrote:
litesong wrote:
Article about "re-pubic-lick-un cruelty":
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/30/opinion/understanding-republican-cruelty.html?src=trending&module=Ribbon&version=context&region=Header&action=click&contentCollection=Trending&pgtype=article

From the article:
Republicans start from a sort of baseline of cruelty toward the less fortunate, of hostility toward anything that protects families against catastrophe.
In this sense there's nothing new about their health plan. What it does — punish the poor and working class, cut taxes on the rich — is what every major G.O.P. policy proposal does. The only difference is that this time it's all out in the open.


Just like the Obama Health care plan did.

The thing needs to be abolished so the free market can work.


Don't talk to a psychotic that way. He may not like being cyber-bullied and run away from home.
01-07-2017 16:11
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
"old sick silly sleepy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner badnight" bluffed:
litesong wrote:From the article:
Republicans start from a sort of baseline of cruelty toward the less fortunate, of hostility toward anything that protects families against catastrophe.
In this sense there's nothing new about their health plan. What it does — punish the poor and working class, cut taxes on the rich — is what every major G.O.P. policy proposal does. The only difference is that this time it's all out in the open.

the Obama Health care plan did.

"old sick silly sleepy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner badnight" points out the re-pubic-lick-un tensions added to gov't health care that kept health care insurance businesses from collapsing.
01-07-2017 20:59
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(22470)
litesong wrote:
"old sick silly sleepy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner badnight" bluffed:
litesong wrote:From the article:
Republicans start from a sort of baseline of cruelty toward the less fortunate, of hostility toward anything that protects families against catastrophe.
In this sense there's nothing new about their health plan. What it does — punish the poor and working class, cut taxes on the rich — is what every major G.O.P. policy proposal does. The only difference is that this time it's all out in the open.

the Obama Health care plan did.

"old sick silly sleepy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner badnight" points out the re-pubic-lick-un tensions added to gov't health care that kept health care insurance businesses from collapsing.


The health care insurance businesses ARE collapsing. They are getting out the Obamacare program as fast as they can. The bill the Republicans have put forth does nothing to fix that.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
01-07-2017 22:28
Wake
★★★★★
(4034)
Into the Night wrote:
litesong wrote:
"old sick silly sleepy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner badnight" bluffed:
litesong wrote:From the article:
Republicans start from a sort of baseline of cruelty toward the less fortunate, of hostility toward anything that protects families against catastrophe.
In this sense there's nothing new about their health plan. What it does — punish the poor and working class, cut taxes on the rich — is what every major G.O.P. policy proposal does. The only difference is that this time it's all out in the open.

the Obama Health care plan did.

"old sick silly sleepy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner badnight" points out the re-pubic-lick-un tensions added to gov't health care that kept health care insurance businesses from collapsing.


The health care insurance businesses ARE collapsing. They are getting out the Obamacare program as fast as they can. The bill the Republicans have put forth does nothing to fix that.


The psychotic doesn't know that because he couldn't see his hand in front of his face. If the Republicans don't pass the bill fine. Obama-care is collapsing from it's own weight. Hospitals are closing or were until city and county governments starting keeping them open. But they aren't saying that. Just that all the other things that these local governments did with taxpayers dollars have ceased.
17-07-2017 03:40
StarMan
★☆☆☆☆
(88)
Wake wrote:
litesong wrote:
Demonstrates again his intellectual powers that almost match a cockroach.



My Friend, please, leave the hateful commentaries to the Left - you know, the people who riot in the streets, burning cars and buildings, breaking windows, setting fire to Trump supporters' hair, hitting them over the head with heavy U-Bolt bicycle locks, threatening assassinations, shooting up Republican baseball games.

For more details on Leftist insanity, look up DemocratInsanity on google.
17-07-2017 06:55
Wake
★★★★★
(4034)
StarMan wrote:
Wake wrote:
litesong wrote:
Demonstrates again his intellectual powers that almost match a cockroach.



My Friend, please, leave the hateful commentaries to the Left - you know, the people who riot in the streets, burning cars and buildings, breaking windows, setting fire to Trump supporters' hair, hitting them over the head with heavy U-Bolt bicycle locks, threatening assassinations, shooting up Republican baseball games.

For more details on Leftist insanity, look up DemocratInsanity on google.


That's not "hateful". It is a clear description of litebrain. Just look at his postings here - he isn't here to debate anything - he holds full time conversations with himself. Calling him a cockroach is a compliment.
17-07-2017 07:35
StarMan
★☆☆☆☆
(88)
Wake wrote:
Calling him a cockroach is a compliment.


Don't do it. Be a better man than that.

Strength and honor.
17-07-2017 18:00
Wake
★★★★★
(4034)
StarMan wrote:
Wake wrote:
Calling him a cockroach is a compliment.


Don't do it. Be a better man than that.

Strength and honor.


Would a better man simply twist his head off of his neck? Please, please, please???
17-07-2017 19:17
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
Wake wrote:
StarMan wrote:
Wake wrote: Calling him a cockroach is a compliment.

Don't do it. Be a better man than that.

Would a better man simply twist his head off of his neck?

"old sick silly sleepy sleazy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" can't be a better man, continues earning its characteristics as an old sick silly sleepy sleazy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & named accurately.
Meanwhile:
February 1, 2017 Arctic sea ice VOLUME was ~ 2500 cubic kilometers less than to date February 1, 2016. As a TREND, February 1, 2017 Arctic sea ice VOLUME is 10,600 cubic kilometers LESS than the average February 1, year sea ice VOLUME of the 1980's. Present Arctic sea ice VOLUME loss is 11,000+ cubic kilometers than the average for the 1980's. The energy to melt such a volume of ice (almost 22 kilometers by 22 kilometers by 65000 feet high) is about 37+ times the annual energy used by the United States of America. A thousand thousand thousand thousand ton iceberg just undocked from Antarctica.
Adding to:
New & old data is nice:
For 390(+?) STRAIGHT months, global Earth temperatures have been above the 20th century average. This has occurred DESPITE the solar TSI energy output being languid for decades, & below normal for 10 years (including a 3+ year period of low solar TSI energy setting a 100 year low). When the sun returns to normal (& it will because it has INCREASED very slowly for 5 billion years), AGW effects will increase strongly. In late 2016, the Present High Arctic Berserker, or PHAB, or FAB ( over- temperatures on nearly 4 million square kilometers of the High Arctic), jumped to 20degC over-temperature. MIND YOU!! This is NOT a local city temperature over say a 20 kilometer by 20 kilometer square. It is over an equivalent square almost 2000 kilometers by 2000 kilometers. Within the last 2 years in the MIDDLE OF WINTER, our Earth's North Pole heated above the freezing point of water for short times, on three occasions.
Edited on 17-07-2017 19:20
17-07-2017 19:34
Wake
★★★★★
(4034)
litesong wrote:
For 390(+?) STRAIGHT months, global Earth temperatures have been above the 20th century average. This has occurred DESPITE the solar TSI energy output being languid for decades, & below normal for 10 years (including a 3+ year period of low solar TSI energy setting a 100 year low). When the sun returns to normal (& it will because it has INCREASED very slowly for 5 billion years), AGW effects will increase strongly. In late 2016, the Present High Arctic Berserker, or PHAB, or FAB ( over- temperatures on nearly 4 million square kilometers of the High Arctic), jumped to 20degC over-temperature. MIND YOU!! This is NOT a local city temperature over say a 20 kilometer by 20 kilometer square. It is over an equivalent square almost 2000 kilometers by 2000 kilometers. Within the last 2 years in the MIDDLE OF WINTER, our Earth's North Pole heated above the freezing point of water for short times, on three occasions.


Assuming your numbers are correct: Do you realize that 390 months is 32 years? That this would mean that not only has the entire 21st century had temperatures higher than your so-called 20th century average but that over 15% of the 20th century would have been over this "average" as well. Not counting the fact that in averages you have half above a line and half below.

So by all means explain to us how this period of time could in ANY manner be considered "higher than" anything and not the actual normal temperature?
17-07-2017 20:57
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(22470)
Wake wrote:
StarMan wrote:
Wake wrote:
Calling him a cockroach is a compliment.


Don't do it. Be a better man than that.

Strength and honor.


Would a better man simply twist his head off of his neck? Please, please, please???


You COULD always ignore him like the rest of us do.

The guy worships the argument from randU so devoutly that he is like a ship with a stuck rudder. NOTHING is going to deflect him from his course.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
17-07-2017 20:58
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(22470)
Wake wrote:
litesong wrote:
For 390(+?) STRAIGHT months, global Earth temperatures have been above the 20th century average. This has occurred DESPITE the solar TSI energy output being languid for decades, & below normal for 10 years (including a 3+ year period of low solar TSI energy setting a 100 year low). When the sun returns to normal (& it will because it has INCREASED very slowly for 5 billion years), AGW effects will increase strongly. In late 2016, the Present High Arctic Berserker, or PHAB, or FAB ( over- temperatures on nearly 4 million square kilometers of the High Arctic), jumped to 20degC over-temperature. MIND YOU!! This is NOT a local city temperature over say a 20 kilometer by 20 kilometer square. It is over an equivalent square almost 2000 kilometers by 2000 kilometers. Within the last 2 years in the MIDDLE OF WINTER, our Earth's North Pole heated above the freezing point of water for short times, on three occasions.


Assuming your numbers are correct: Do you realize that 390 months is 32 years? That this would mean that not only has the entire 21st century had temperatures higher than your so-called 20th century average but that over 15% of the 20th century would have been over this "average" as well. Not counting the fact that in averages you have half above a line and half below.

So by all means explain to us how this period of time could in ANY manner be considered "higher than" anything and not the actual normal temperature?


You're actually going to argue as if his numbers had any meaning beyond random numbers?


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
18-07-2017 00:30
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
Into the Night wrote:
litesong wrote:
"old sick silly sleepy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner badnight" bluffed:
litesong wrote:From the article:
Republicans start from a sort of baseline of cruelty toward the less fortunate, of hostility toward anything that protects families against catastrophe.
In this sense there's nothing new about their health plan. What it does — punish the poor and working class, cut taxes on the rich — is what every major G.O.P. policy proposal does. The only difference is that this time it's all out in the open.

the Obama Health care plan did.

"old sick silly sleepy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner badnight" points out the re-pubic-lick-un tensions added to gov't health care that kept health care insurance businesses from collapsing.

The health care insurance businesses ARE collapsing. They are getting out the Obamacare program as fast as they can. The bill the Republicans have put forth does nothing to fix that.

Like I said, the problems that re-pubic-lick-uns added to Health Care, hurt it. re-pubic-lick-un health care plans doom their present non-efforts. re-pubic-lick-uns don't want to care for americans..... the rich being the exception.
18-07-2017 01:04
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
Wake wrote:
litesong wrote:
For 390(+?) STRAIGHT months, global Earth temperatures have been above the 20th century average. This has occurred DESPITE the solar TSI energy output being languid for decades, & below normal for 10 years (including a 3+ year period of low solar TSI energy setting a 100 year low). When the sun returns to normal (& it will because it has INCREASED very slowly for 5 billion years), AGW effects will increase strongly. In late 2016, the Present High Arctic Berserker, or PHAB, or FAB ( over- temperatures on nearly 4 million square kilometers of the High Arctic), jumped to 20degC over-temperature. MIND YOU!! This is NOT a local city temperature over say a 20 kilometer by 20 kilometer square. It is over an equivalent square almost 2000 kilometers by 2000 kilometers. Within the last 2 years in the MIDDLE OF WINTER, our Earth's North Pole heated above the freezing point of water for short times, on three occasions.

Assuming your numbers are correct: Do you realize that 390 months is 32 years? That this would mean that not only has the entire 21st century had temperatures higher than your so-called 20th century average but that over 15% of the 20th century would have been over this "average" as well.

Its good that you don't pay attention to me. However, IF you were paying attention to me, you are correct that 390 months is ~ 32 years. The last month to be under the 20th century average was somewhere in 1986, I think. & you are correct again. ALL MONTHS in the 21st century were above the 20th century average. Stated another way...... not ONE MONTH since ~ 1986 has been below the 20th century average. Stated another way, as you have stated, ALL MONTHS since ~ 1986 have been above the 20th century average.

However, you may NOT BE CORRECT that the entire 21st century had temperatures higher than the 20th century average. There probably were some weeks & many days in the 21st century that had TEMPERATURES UNDER the 20th century average. As I have stated tho, NOT ONE MONTH's average temperature has been below the 20th century average temperature for ~ 390 months.
It is good tho, that you don't pay attention to me.
18-07-2017 18:36
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
litesong wrote:ALL MONTHS in the 21st century were above the 20th century average. Stated another way...... not ONE MONTH since ~ 1986 has been below the 20th century average. Stated another way, as you have stated, ALL MONTHS since ~ 1986 have been above the 20th century average.

Stated another way, the block of the last 32 years has been well over the 20th century average.
AGW denier liar whiners have said that cooler climate is coming, even an ice age, despite the ever rising Earth temperatures & un-powered by the long-term depressed solar TSI, from which AGW denier liar whiners declare a coming ice age.
First, AGW denier liar whiners need one year below the 20th century average to give credibility to "their coming ice age", which appears to be a pipe-dream(AGW denier liar whiners put potent pot in their pipes). Second, a two score set of years must be depressed below the 20th century average to really make the coming "ice age" take off. En total, AGW denier liar whiners bet that 70+ years of depressed TSI will cause their "ice age". In effect, AGW denier liar whiners depend on sub-solar energy to deny the AGW, which isn't even a balanced pool table...... or science. However, it is AGW denier liar whiner "sigh-ants".
Edited on 18-07-2017 18:38
18-07-2017 18:42
Wake
★★★★★
(4034)
litesong wrote:Blank


You certainly have a great deal of enjoyment having conversations with yourself. Have you ever asked yourself why no one wants to converse with you?
18-07-2017 21:08
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(22470)
Wake wrote:
litesong wrote:Blank


You certainly have a great deal of enjoyment having conversations with yourself. Have you ever asked yourself why no one wants to converse with you?


Apparently YOU do.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
19-07-2017 02:20
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
Wake wrote: You certainly have a great deal of enjoyment having conversations with yourself. Have you ever asked yourself why no one wants to converse with you?

It is good that AGW denier liar whiners can't answer the changes occurring in the Earth. I know many time threateners &/or AGW denier liar whiners like to threaten me & my wife. It is good that AGW denier liar whiners don't like to converse with me.
20-07-2017 05:10
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
litesong wrote: I know many time threateners &/or AGW denier liar whiners like to threaten me & my wife.

Correction:
I know many times, when threateners &/or AGW denier liar whiners threatened me & my wife.
20-07-2017 05:43
GasGuzzler
★★★★★
(3038)
Thank you for that clarification. For a brief moment there I thought you might actually be a little bit wacko.

Edited on 20-07-2017 06:10
20-07-2017 19:53
Wake
★★★★★
(4034)
GasGuzzler wrote:
Thank you for that clarification. For a brief moment there I thought you might actually be a little bit wacko.


Ask him to quote when anyone has threatened Pocohantas - apparently his wife. Personally I think that normal people threaten his boyfriend.
23-07-2017 18:44
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" woofed: Ask him....

It is good that you don't pay attention to me:
For 390(+?) STRAIGHT months, global Earth temperatures have been above the 20th century average. This has occurred DESPITE the solar TSI energy output being languid for decades, & below normal for 10 years (including a 3+ year period of low solar TSI energy setting a 100 year low). When the sun returns to normal (& it will because it has INCREASED very slowly for 5 billion years), AGW effects will increase strongly. In late 2016, the Present High Arctic Berserker, or PHAB, or FAB ( over- temperatures on nearly 4 million square kilometers of the High Arctic), jumped to 20degC over-temperature. MIND YOU!! This is NOT a local city temperature over say a 20 kilometer by 20 kilometer square. It is over an equivalent square almost 2000 kilometers by 2000 kilometers. Within the last 2 years in the MIDDLE OF WINTER, our Earth's North Pole heated above the freezing point of water for short times, on three occasions.
////////
Its good that you don't pay attention to me. However, IF you were paying attention to me, you are correct that 390 months is ~ 32 years. The last month to be under the 20th century average was somewhere in 1986, I think. & you are correct again. ALL MONTHS in the 21st century were above the 20th century average. Stated another way...... not ONE MONTH since ~ 1986 has been below the 20th century average. Stated another way, as you have stated, ALL MONTHS since ~ 1986 have been above the 20th century average.
However, you may NOT BE CORRECT that the entire 21st century had temperatures higher than the 20th century average. There probably were some weeks & many days in the 21st century that had TEMPERATURES UNDER the 20th century average. As I have stated tho, NOT ONE MONTH's average temperature has been below the 20th century average temperature for ~ 390 months.
It is good tho, that you don't pay attention to me.
//////
ALL MONTHS in the 21st century were above the 20th century average. Stated another way...... not ONE MONTH since ~ 1986 has been below the 20th century average. Stated another way, as you have stated, ALL MONTHS since ~ 1986 have been above the 20th century average.
///////
Stated another way, the block of the last 32 years has been well over the 20th century average. Yeah, even when the 32 years block is chunked into month-long periods, not even one month can be found to be below the 20th century average temperature.
AGW denier liar whiners have said that cooler climate is coming, even an ice age, despite the ever rising Earth temperatures & un-powered by the long-term depressed solar TSI, from which AGW denier liar whiners declare a coming ice age.
First, AGW denier liar whiners need one year below the 20th century average to give credibility to "their coming ice age", which appears to be a pipe-dream(AGW denier liar whiners put potent pot in their pipes). Second, a two score set of years must be depressed below the 20th century average to really make the coming "ice age" take off. En total, AGW denier liar whiners bet that 70+ years of depressed TSI will cause their "ice age". In effect, AGW denier liar whiners depend on sub-solar energy to deny the AGW, which isn't even a balanced pool table...... or science. However, it is AGW denier liar whiner "sigh-ants". Yeah, even depending on an uneven pool table, AGW denier liar whiners are still losing.
///////
It is good tho, that AGW denier liar whiners, who are often old sick silly sleepy steezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pigs & sometimes strong threateners, don't pay attention to me.
Edited on 23-07-2017 18:48
Page 2 of 2<12





Join the debate Trump Spanks Global Warming:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Do you think the Supreme Court will ban Trump6431-01-2024 22:27
How many of the unreleased FBI-Swan Interview files does Trump have?416-09-2023 03:05
How many of the unreleased FBI-JFK assassination files does Trump have?4513-09-2023 22:50
The deep state has a choice, destroy Trump, or help him get reelected113-09-2023 01:14
Trump appointed federal Judge Limits Federal Government's Contact with Social Media Companies306-07-2023 18:11
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact