The Prevention of Climate Change Through CO2 Removal

noah-whitney wrote:
Myself and a team are working on gathering some information on what everyone things about climate change prevention and what us as people are doing to help prevent permanent damage. If anyone is interested, please take a few minutes to complete this quick survey. We are soliciting you with a product or signing you up on an email list without your permission.

It would be a ton of help to us!

Feel free to reach out individually with any questions.

https://forms.gle/pfRFMj9ePma6uVAZ8

noah-whitney wrote:
Myself and a team are working on gathering some information on what everyone things about climate change prevention and what us as people are doing to help prevent permanent damage. If anyone is interested, please take a few minutes to complete this quick survey. We are soliciting you with a product or signing you up on an email list without your permission.

It would be a ton of help to us!

Feel free to reach out individually with any questions.

https://forms.gle/pfRFMj9ePma6uVAZ8

duncan61 wrote:
I would like to suggest you do your own research as I have and you will uncover the greatest hoax played on mankind ever.It is complicated and has many facets but as you peel back the claims you will realise the truth.Sea level is not rising the Earths mean average temperature is not rising and the polar caps are not melting.The Earth is greener than the 70s and the oceans are full of fish and crustacea at least where I live in Perth Western Australia.Your intentions are honourable if perhaps missguided.I have responded to the survey you posted

duncan61 wrote:
Your a Meanie IBDM.My favorite part of watching for and against debates is the calm logic the against team use and the hysterical preaching of the for team I watched one Scientist throw the papers with the sea level claims in the face of the guy questioning it.Not the way to win a debate losing it and flinging your evidence.Fact.The average Annual temperature variation of all Canadian major cities have shown no increase or decrease since measuring began.If the warming people were right it should have started happening

duncan61 wrote:
Thanks for weighing in James.This is a debate forum and you open with I dont want to talk about it.I followed the link and it is exactly the type of misinformation that is being seeded in to society

This range represents the median values from a low global emission scenario (Representative Concentration Pathway [RCP] 2.6) to a high global emission scenario (RCP8.5). The data is from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) multimodel ensemble. Learn more about emission scenarios.

The charts I saw and had explained to me last night were from the actual temperature readings taken at all the major cities in Canada which has always been famously seasonal I have relatives who spent there lives there and it is uncanny how the seasons work to the time beat they do.This data set which is real and not a fudged up model shows no rise in temperature anywhere at all.If there are scientists doing funded research but will not share the findings why are we funding them

James___ wrote:

duncan61 wrote:
Thanks for weighing in James.This is a debate forum and you open with I dont want to talk about it.I followed the link and it is exactly the type of misinformation that is being seeded in to society

This range represents the median values from a low global emission scenario (Representative Concentration Pathway [RCP] 2.6) to a high global emission scenario (RCP8.5). The data is from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) multimodel ensemble. Learn more about emission scenarios.

The charts I saw and had explained to me last night were from the actual temperature readings taken at all the major cities in Canada which has always been famously seasonal I have relatives who spent there lives there and it is uncanny how the seasons work to the time beat they do.This data set which is real and not a fudged up model shows no rise in temperature anywhere at all.If there are scientists doing funded research but will not share the findings why are we funding them

It seems you just want someone to go after. You say that you saw charts and yet where are they? Should I take your word for it? I think people like you are funny. I have previously tried to make you aware of actual science but like most people, all you know is the debate. You can't think outside of it. That's not my problem.

When you read this which is from Australia, something you won't be able to consider is that CO2 levels are higher in the northern hemisphere than in the southern hemisphere. That won't mean anything to you and I can't think for you.
http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/updates/articles/a015.shtml

Into the Night wrote:

James___ wrote:

duncan61 wrote:
Thanks for weighing in James.This is a debate forum and you open with I dont want to talk about it.I followed the link and it is exactly the type of misinformation that is being seeded in to society

This range represents the median values from a low global emission scenario (Representative Concentration Pathway [RCP] 2.6) to a high global emission scenario (RCP8.5). The data is from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) multimodel ensemble. Learn more about emission scenarios.

The charts I saw and had explained to me last night were from the actual temperature readings taken at all the major cities in Canada which has always been famously seasonal I have relatives who spent there lives there and it is uncanny how the seasons work to the time beat they do.This data set which is real and not a fudged up model shows no rise in temperature anywhere at all.If there are scientists doing funded research but will not share the findings why are we funding them

It seems you just want someone to go after. You say that you saw charts and yet where are they? Should I take your word for it? I think people like you are funny. I have previously tried to make you aware of actual science but like most people, all you know is the debate. You can't think outside of it. That's not my problem.

When you read this which is from Australia, something you won't be able to consider is that CO2 levels are higher in the northern hemisphere than in the southern hemisphere. That won't mean anything to you and I can't think for you.
http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/updates/articles/a015.shtml

It is not possible to measure the CO2 level of a hemisphere (or of the Earth). There are not enough stations, and CO2 is not uniformly distributed in the atmosphere. You are making stuff up, James.

duncan61 wrote:
We have an annual run of salmon in Autumn up the west coast to spawn.They are actually a sea perch but are similar to northern salmon in appearance so early settlers called them salmon.If the sea of Perth does not cool down in Autumn they do not come up the coast.They are on the way already and will be in the metro area in a few weeks.I am aware this is not science but it works.The sea temperature of Fremantle is 23 c I am going to monitor it.

James___ wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

James___ wrote:

duncan61 wrote:
Thanks for weighing in James.This is a debate forum and you open with I dont want to talk about it.I followed the link and it is exactly the type of misinformation that is being seeded in to society

This range represents the median values from a low global emission scenario (Representative Concentration Pathway [RCP] 2.6) to a high global emission scenario (RCP8.5). The data is from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) multimodel ensemble. Learn more about emission scenarios.

The charts I saw and had explained to me last night were from the actual temperature readings taken at all the major cities in Canada which has always been famously seasonal I have relatives who spent there lives there and it is uncanny how the seasons work to the time beat they do.This data set which is real and not a fudged up model shows no rise in temperature anywhere at all.If there are scientists doing funded research but will not share the findings why are we funding them

It seems you just want someone to go after. You say that you saw charts and yet where are they? Should I take your word for it? I think people like you are funny. I have previously tried to make you aware of actual science but like most people, all you know is the debate. You can't think outside of it. That's not my problem.

When you read this which is from Australia, something you won't be able to consider is that CO2 levels are higher in the northern hemisphere than in the southern hemisphere. That won't mean anything to you and I can't think for you.
http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/updates/articles/a015.shtml

It is not possible to measure the CO2 level of a hemisphere (or of the Earth). There are not enough stations, and CO2 is not uniformly distributed in the atmosphere. You are making stuff up, James.

For what I was referring to, the difference in the amount of fossil fuels, organic matter, etc. being burned would suggest a difference in CO2 levels between the northern and southern hemispheres.

James___ wrote:
Also, since there is the Coriolis Effect https://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/coriolis-effect/ it's possible that the mixing of atmospheric gasses or gases (both spellings are correct) are limited because of limited air circulation between hemispheres.

James___ wrote:
Also, there is more land as well as people in the northern hemisphere so there is also more pollution.

James___ wrote:
And I think most countries in the Group of 8 are also in the northern hemisphere.

James___ wrote:
As you can see, we don't really need to measure CO2 levels to know that there is more of it in the northern hemisphere.

James___ wrote:
...deleted Holy Link...
Another way of looking at things ITN is that geosciences might be how Gaia makes Gaia known. You know, there is something to be observed so we can understand that it "is".

James___ wrote:

duncan61 wrote:
We have an annual run of salmon in Autumn up the west coast to spawn.They are actually a sea perch but are similar to northern salmon in appearance so early settlers called them salmon.If the sea of Perth does not cool down in Autumn they do not come up the coast.They are on the way already and will be in the metro area in a few weeks.I am aware this is not science but it works.The sea temperature of Fremantle is 23 c I am going to monitor it.

My father said the same things about crab (in Alaska). Of course today we import it (king crab) from Russia because the crab season is too short (in Alaska). He thought it was funny when the stores started buying the crab they threw away. He said they changed it's name to "snow" from tanner because who would buy tanner crab?
My pops monitored it quite well. I hope you'll do the same.

p.s., first crab I ever saw we hauled in from a drop net in a fjord. They don't have fjords in the US, do they have any in Australia? Just trying to find out how much you have in common with Americans.
ie., there is a harbour, food has flavour, etc., right?

Into the Night wrote:

James___ wrote:

duncan61 wrote:
We have an annual run of salmon in Autumn up the west coast to spawn.They are actually a sea perch but are similar to northern salmon in appearance so early settlers called them salmon.If the sea of Perth does not cool down in Autumn they do not come up the coast.They are on the way already and will be in the metro area in a few weeks.I am aware this is not science but it works.The sea temperature of Fremantle is 23 c I am going to monitor it.

My father said the same things about crab (in Alaska). Of course today we import it (king crab) from Russia because the crab season is too short (in Alaska). He thought it was funny when the stores started buying the crab they threw away. He said they changed it's name to "snow" from tanner because who would buy tanner crab?
My pops monitored it quite well. I hope you'll do the same.

p.s., first crab I ever saw we hauled in from a drop net in a fjord. They don't have fjords in the US, do they have any in Australia? Just trying to find out how much you have in common with Americans.
ie., there is a harbour, food has flavour, etc., right?

We catch our own crab. That fleet is based right here in Seattle. They do most of the crabbing in the Bering Sea, not in fjords.

James___ wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

James___ wrote:

duncan61 wrote:
We have an annual run of salmon in Autumn up the west coast to spawn.They are actually a sea perch but are similar to northern salmon in appearance so early settlers called them salmon.If the sea of Perth does not cool down in Autumn they do not come up the coast.They are on the way already and will be in the metro area in a few weeks.I am aware this is not science but it works.The sea temperature of Fremantle is 23 c I am going to monitor it.

My father said the same things about crab (in Alaska). Of course today we import it (king crab) from Russia because the crab season is too short (in Alaska). He thought it was funny when the stores started buying the crab they threw away. He said they changed it's name to "snow" from tanner because who would buy tanner crab?
My pops monitored it quite well. I hope you'll do the same.

p.s., first crab I ever saw we hauled in from a drop net in a fjord. They don't have fjords in the US, do they have any in Australia? Just trying to find out how much you have in common with Americans.
ie., there is a harbour, food has flavour, etc., right?

We catch our own crab. That fleet is based right here in Seattle. They do most of the crabbing in the Bering Sea, not in fjords.

What crab? Dungeness, snow? Snow crab used to be called tanner and was thrown overboard. Just not worth eating. Most King crab today is imported from Russia. So what they catch must be dungeness. After all, the king crab season is what, 2 weeks long?