Nuclear fussion should be available in the next ten years...

HarveyH55 wrote:

IBdaMann wrote:

Xadoman wrote:I think that logic is not perfect.

What does this mean? How is logic imperfect? Is it the wrong shade of blue? Please be clear.

Mathematics, being built on logic, would be "imperfect" in the exact same way so I'm eager to learn what that is.

Xadoman wrote:Zeno s paradox is a perfect example how logic could lead to false conclusion.

Incorrect. Logic is not to blame if people choose to not use it and instead decide to form their own erroneous conclusions.

Some modern day examples of Zeno's paradoxes are Greenhouse Effect, ocean acidification and global glacier disappearance.

How does logic not work, exactly?

.

There is logic, and there is democrat-logic... Plenty of examples that don't make any logical sense, except to democrats.

Rising sea levels
Free, to long a list to even get started
Ozone-hole
Abortion. Okay to kill inconvient babies, but oddly not okay to euthanize terminally ill, convicted murders, elderly.
Drought in a desert
Joe Biden
Covid crisis
Vaccine mandates
Nobel Prize

James___ wrote:And yet capitalism is based on investors creating services or products that create demand.

James___ wrote:As a result consumers borrow money to pay for said services/goods.

James___ wrote: And to pay for this, the US increases its debt limit.

James___ wrote: Basically Republicans are getting rich of corporate welfare.

James___ wrote:Why a 2 party system does not work.

James___ wrote:There are masters and then there are the slaves.

IBdaMann wrote:

James___ wrote:And yet capitalism is based on investors creating services or products that create demand.

I'll give you this, this is a totally true non sequitur.

James___ wrote:
And yet capitalism is based on investors creating services or products that create demand. As a result consumers borrow money to pay for said services/goods. With the Republican (Sen. McConnell and his wife Elaine Chao), let's export jobs and money to China which profits the Foremost Group which is controlled by the People's Party of China.
And to pay for this, the US increases its debt limit. As Harvey55 has previously stated, China is like the US, it is a capitalist country which Republicans support. This might increase the demand for social services but Republicans oppose higher taxes to pay for those services because they are exporting jobs to increase their personal wealth.
Basically Republicans are getting rich of corporate welfare. Why a 2 party system does not work.
There are masters and then there are the slaves.

James___ wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

James___ wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Xadoman wrote:

And the belief that logic is perfect

I think that logic is not perfect. Zeno s paradox is a perfect example how logic could lead to false conclusion.

Zeno's paradox's are not related to logic.
They are related to mathematics, and have been resolved through the invention of calculus.

The paradoxes themselves are base rate fallacies.

Logic is a closed functional system, just like mathematics.
If you perfectly follow the rules, it works.

In other words, Zeno's paradoxes are not logic.

Logic is a closed functional system, just like mathematics.
If you perfectly follow the rules, it works.

"Perfectly" is a condition which only you can define, right? This would explain why logic is not fallible then, right? That's because it'n an extension of yourself?

Apparently I have to say it again: Logic is a closed functional system, just like mathematics.
If you perfectly follow the rules, it works.

Please don't confuse mathematics with logic. It is a system that can change or adapt as we continue to learn more about science. We can apply it in new ways. This is what you define as falsifiable.
With logic, I guess it is like you. It is closed to a new understanding or considering something in a different "light". Yet it is "your" perspective which defines what "perfect" is.

James___ wrote:
And yet capitalism is based on investors creating services or products that create demand.

James___ wrote:
As a result consumers borrow money to pay for said services/goods.

James___ wrote:
With the Republican (Sen. McConnell and his wife Elaine Chao), let's export jobs and money to China which profits the Foremost Group which is controlled by the People's Party of China.
And to pay for this, the US increases its debt limit.

James___ wrote:
As Harvey55 has previously stated, China is like the US, it is a capitalist country which Republicans support.

James___ wrote:
This might increase the demand for social services but Republicans oppose higher taxes to pay for those services because they are exporting jobs to increase their personal wealth.

James___ wrote:
Basically Republicans are getting rich of corporate welfare.

James___ wrote:
Why a 2 party system does not work.
There are masters and then there are the slaves.

keepit wrote:
Harvey,
I've heard your line about labor being so valuable all my life.
Sure, it's valuable but so is leadership and design and planning, etc. Don't forget about those things.

keepit wrote:More semantic crap huh, itn?

Into the Night wrote:

James___ wrote:
And yet capitalism is based on investors creating services or products that create demand.

No. Non-sequitur fallacy. Capitalism is simply people creating products or services voluntarily. They are free to set their prices according to market demands (price discovery).

keepit wrote:
Harvey,
I've heard your line about labor being so valuable all my life.
Sure, it's valuable but so is leadership and design and planning, etc. Don't forget about those things.

James___ wrote:

keepit wrote:
Harvey,
I've heard your line about labor being so valuable all my life.
Sure, it's valuable but so is leadership and design and planning, etc. Don't forget about those things.

You need to remember that Harvey supports Trump who saves money by hiring illegal immigrants. At the same time he doesn't like paying businesses that work for him because it's more important for Trump to go cheap when businesses might want to pay their employees.
Notice how strange that is? And if Republicans have their way, when Harvey retires he'll be glad to pay more for Medicare because he'll be supporting the Republican party.

HarveyH55 wrote:

James___ wrote:

keepit wrote:
Harvey,
I've heard your line about labor being so valuable all my life.
Sure, it's valuable but so is leadership and design and planning, etc. Don't forget about those things.

You need to remember that Harvey supports Trump who saves money by hiring illegal immigrants. At the same time he doesn't like paying businesses that work for him because it's more important for Trump to go cheap when businesses might want to pay their employees.
Notice how strange that is? And if Republicans have their way, when Harvey retires he'll be glad to pay more for Medicare because he'll be supporting the Republican party.

Coming from a charity case... Trump wasn't my first pick, but was a better option than your 'girl'.

Trump doesn't hire labor, he contracts out projects. Any illegals, aren't actually Trump employees, nor are the contractors who hired them.

James___ wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

James___ wrote:
And yet capitalism is based on investors creating services or products that create demand.

No. Non-sequitur fallacy. Capitalism is simply people creating products or services voluntarily. They are free to set their prices according to market demands (price discovery).

And now you're making industry sound like a charity which we all know it's not. And that is your Non-sequitur fallacy.

James___ wrote:

keepit wrote:
Harvey,
I've heard your line about labor being so valuable all my life.
Sure, it's valuable but so is leadership and design and planning, etc. Don't forget about those things.

You need to remember that Harvey supports Trump who saves money by hiring illegal immigrants.
At the same time he doesn't like paying businesses that work for him because it's more important for Trump to go cheap when businesses might want to pay their employees.
Notice how strange that is? And if Republicans have their way, when Harvey retires he'll be glad to pay more for Medicare because he'll be supporting the Republican party.

James___ wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

James___ wrote:

keepit wrote:
Harvey,
I've heard your line about labor being so valuable all my life.
Sure, it's valuable but so is leadership and design and planning, etc. Don't forget about those things.

You need to remember that Harvey supports Trump who saves money by hiring illegal immigrants. At the same time he doesn't like paying businesses that work for him because it's more important for Trump to go cheap when businesses might want to pay their employees.
Notice how strange that is? And if Republicans have their way, when Harvey retires he'll be glad to pay more for Medicare because he'll be supporting the Republican party.

Coming from a charity case... Trump wasn't my first pick, but was a better option than your 'girl'.

Trump doesn't hire labor, he contracts out projects. Any illegals, aren't actually Trump employees, nor are the contractors who hired them.

And when you retire, will you say no to taxes? You're deflecting. Will your Medicare premium allow you to support lower taxes? It will support Donald Trump and his foreign national wife.
And remember, like Melania, my father was an immigrant. And like trump's children, am only 1/2 American. You like me, right? My family is like Donald Trump's family except for grandfather was not an illegal immigrant.
To consider actual facts, Donald Trump is the grandson of an illegal immigrant.
Also his wife is an immigrant which makes all of his children only 1/2 American like myself.
So what exactly are you supporting when you support Donald Trump? His lower taxes which increases your cost of living helps you how? And when you support Donald Trump, you are supporting people like myself who you do not like.
But he makes you feel good about supporting his tax breaks for people like him, right? He learned from Newt Gingrich and Christians.

gfm7175 wrote:
James is doing his Jamesbabble again I see...

HarveyH55 wrote:

gfm7175 wrote:
James is doing his Jamesbabble again I see...

Just the corn whiskey talking. Must have just gotten his Social Security Disability check... Wonder if the whiskey jug is half empty, or half full...

The President In 1885 Didn't Stop Immigrant Friedrich Trump From Coming To America

https://www.forbes.com/sites/stuartanderson/2018/01/15/the-president-in-1885-didnt-stop-immigrant-friedrich-trump-from-coming-to-america/?sh=41816f4be49a

James___ wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:

gfm7175 wrote:
James is doing his Jamesbabble again I see...

Just the corn whiskey talking. Must have just gotten his Social Security Disability check... Wonder if the whiskey jug is half empty, or half full...

Is that your answer to the situation you'll be facing when you retire? And it's well known that The Donald is the grandson of an illegal immigrant. Is Forbes a reputable source?

The President In 1885 Didn't Stop Immigrant Friedrich Trump From Coming To America

https://www.forbes.com/sites/stuartanderson/2018/01/15/the-president-in-1885-didnt-stop-immigrant-friedrich-trump-from-coming-to-america/?sh=41816f4be49a

And yet you don't like me Harvey because I am a Veteran with an immigrant father. As you said, only losers would serve America. How patriotic of you.
And yet Trump's grandfather Frederich came with his German wife.
And 2 of 3 wives of Trump were immigrants. Then again, since you don't understand math or science, you might be hiding the fact that you've never had a need to do more and dislike those who are willing to pursue opportunity?
The US used to be known as "The Land of Opportunity" and as you said Harvey, now it is "The Land of Exploitation". And sadly, "real" Americans like yourself are threatened by a disabled Veteran like myself when you don't understand how good you have it.
And sadly you confuse a cup of "joe" (what they drink in the US Navy) with Kentucky Bourbon. I doubt you'll ever get past the hate and that's not my problem but it is yours.

James___ wrote:
p.s., I'll give you 2 freebies Harvey. The laws of physics don't change with scale.
And while a single magnet will have a field, to create a stronger field would require a 2nd magnet. To have 2 opposing magnetic fields would require 4 magnets. And this would allow for stability when "flipping" magnetic fields.

James___ wrote:
This is when it gets technical because the crystals might literally change their polarity without changing their position.

James___ wrote:
An example is if you take a coil in a car that has to be polarized.

James___ wrote:
Its field can have its polarity reversed which would not allow your car to run.

James___ wrote:
This is because it would convert the power to the coil in the wrong direction so what would go to your distributor wouldn't be right.

James___ wrote:
Just am not sure if you've ever worked on cars though and had to watch out for something like that.

James___ wrote:
If you'd like, because you're "smart" we could discuss automotive electrical systems and how an H.E.I. coil works? Then if you now the difference between that and your standard (O.E.M.) coil then you would know about why polarity matters and one way in which it can be controlled.

James___ wrote:
Why "flipping" the field in a quantum computer would matter is because that is how data would be stored.

James___ wrote:
If a computer can't store information then it can't compute, right?

Into the Night wrote:

James___ wrote:
An example is if you take a coil in a car that has to be polarized.

Coils don't have a polarity.

James___ wrote:
Its field can have its polarity reversed which would not allow your car to run.

The coil in your car is a transformer. It doesn't care which way current is flowing in it.

HarveyH55 wrote:
You should actually study some electronics, before you try to school people about the subject. But, I do find it amusing, knowing you babble about something, I know quite a bit about, and you are basically clueless. Kind of give some insight into your other ramblings. Try looking up 'inductance'... Think that is the property you are struggling with...

Resistors aren't polarized. The ballast resistor limits current flow, so shit doesn't burn up, like your plug wires... Electricity always takes the path of least resistance to ground...

James___ wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

James___ wrote:
An example is if you take a coil in a car that has to be polarized.

Coils don't have a polarity.

James___ wrote:
Its field can have its polarity reversed which would not allow your car to run.

The coil in your car is a transformer. It doesn't care which way current is flowing in it.

...deleted random phrases and insults...
I only mention this because a coil on an engine that requires a ballast resistor whether it is inline or mounted on the block is dependent on polarity.

James___ wrote:
This is because reversing polarity on such a coil reduces its output voltage.
...deleted insults and random phrases...

HarveyH55 wrote:
You should actually study some electronics, before you try to school people about the subject. But, I do find it amusing, knowing you babble about something, I know quite a bit about, and you are basically clueless. Kind of give some insight into your other ramblings. Try looking up 'inductance'... Think that is the property you are struggling with...

Resistors aren't polarized. The ballast resistor limits current flow, so shit doesn't burn up, like your plug wires... Electricity always takes the path of least resistance to ground...

James___ wrote:

HarveyH55 wrote:
You should actually study some electronics, before you try to school people about the subject. But, I do find it amusing, knowing you babble about something, I know quite a bit about, and you are basically clueless. Kind of give some insight into your other ramblings. Try looking up 'inductance'... Think that is the property you are struggling with...

Resistors aren't polarized. The ballast resistor limits current flow, so shit doesn't burn up, like your plug wires... Electricity always takes the path of least resistance to ground...

Are you saying that both you and your neighbor (ITN) don't understand how a simple coil works with an engine from the 1960s?

James___ wrote:
This would require its own thread. This kind of gets into what science "is".

James___ wrote:
In today's "world" a polarized magnetic field is what started the "electrical engineering" revolution.

James___ wrote:
The steam locomotive represents the "Industrial Revolution"

James___ wrote:
while Ohm's Law represents the "electrical engineering" revolution.

James___ wrote:
And everyone knows that the industrial revolution is based on Hero's Boiler (the steam locomotive).

James___ wrote:
Kind of why the "Golden Spike" matters.

James___ wrote:
And Harvey, people are learning from your questions/challenges.
They do not know that the "Golden Spike" is the spike that was driven into a railroad tie that connected the east coast with the west coast of the US. They simply don't understand why "gold" showed how valuable it was.

James___ wrote:
And in American history, this was a very significant moment.

Into the Night wrote:

Nope. There already was a transcontinental railroad by the time the Golden Spike was driven. It was privately built (not government built, like the railroad that used the Golden Spike), and could operate with a far greater profit margin than the government railroad could.