Remember me
▼ Content

It's mostly due to human-produced CO2 (Carbon Dioxide)


It's mostly due to human-produced CO2 (Carbon Dioxide)15-02-2011 04:14
DesertphileProfile picture☆☆☆☆☆
(33)
"Attribution of the present-day total greenhouse effect"
http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/2010/2010_Schmidt_etal_1.pdf

"Principles of Planetary Climate" by R. T. Pierrehumbert
http://geosci.uchicago.edu/~rtp1/ClimateBook/ClimateVol1.pdf

"Infrared radiation and planetary temperature"
http://ptonline.aip.org/journals/doc/PHTOAD-ft/vol_64/iss_1/33_1.shtml
http://geosci.uchicago.edu/~rtp1/papers/PhysTodayRT2011.pdf

Scientific Evidence - Increasing Temperatures & Greenhouse Gases
http://www.whrc.org/resources/primer_fundamentals.html

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect
http://www.aip.org/history/climate/co2.htm

Global, Regional, and National Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions
http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/emis/overview_2006.html

Stable isotope ratio mass spectrometry in global climate change research
http://www.bgc.mpg.de/service/iso_gas_lab/publications/PG_WB_IJMS.pdf

Global oceanic and land biotic carbon sinks
http://bluemoon.ucsd.edu/publications/manning/ManningandKeeling2006.pdf

Measurements of the Radiative Surface Forcing of Climate
http://ams.confex.com/ams/Annual2006/techprogram/paper_100737.htm

How do we know more CO2 is causing warming?
http://www.skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-co2-enhanced-greenhouse-effect.htm

Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing
http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-chapter2.pdf

NOAA: Past Decade Warmest on Record According to Scientists in 48 Countries; Earth has been growing warmer for more than fifty years
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2010/20100728_stateoftheclimate.html


http://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/cmb/bams-sotc/2009/bams-sotc-2009-brochure-lo-rez.pdf

http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/emis/overview_2006.html

http://www.bgc.mpg.de/service/iso_gas_lab/publications/PG_WB_IJMS.pdf

http://bluemoon.ucsd.edu/publications/manning/ManningandKeeling2006.pdf

http://www.skepticalscience.com/Are-humans-too-insignificant-to-affect-global-climate.htm

http://www.eumetsat.eu/Home/Main/Publications/Conference_and_Workshop_Proceedings/groups/cps/documents/document/pdf_conf_p50_s9_01_harries_v.pdf

http://ams.confex.com/ams/Annual2006/techprogram/paper_100737.htm

http://www.skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-co2-enhanced-greenhouse-effect.htm
16-02-2011 04:03
Hayduke
☆☆☆☆☆
(21)
These voluminous "citations" have little to do with the question: Is global warming due to anthropogenic greenhouse gases?

Desertphile wrote:
"Attribution of the present-day total greenhouse effect"
http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/2010/2010_Schmidt_etal_1.pdf

"Principles of Planetary Climate" by R. T. Pierrehumbert
http://geosci.uchicago.edu/~rtp1/ClimateBook/ClimateVol1.pdf

"Infrared radiation and planetary temperature"
http://ptonline.aip.org/journals/doc/PHTOAD-ft/vol_64/iss_1/33_1.shtml
http://geosci.uchicago.edu/~rtp1/papers/PhysTodayRT2011.pdf

Scientific Evidence - Increasing Temperatures & Greenhouse Gases
http://www.whrc.org/resources/primer_fundamentals.html

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect
http://www.aip.org/history/climate/co2.htm

Global, Regional, and National Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions
http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/emis/overview_2006.html

Stable isotope ratio mass spectrometry in global climate change research
http://www.bgc.mpg.de/service/iso_gas_lab/publications/PG_WB_IJMS.pdf

Global oceanic and land biotic carbon sinks
http://bluemoon.ucsd.edu/publications/manning/ManningandKeeling2006.pdf

Measurements of the Radiative Surface Forcing of Climate
http://ams.confex.com/ams/Annual2006/techprogram/paper_100737.htm

How do we know more CO2 is causing warming?
http://www.skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-co2-enhanced-greenhouse-effect.htm

Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing
http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-chapter2.pdf

NOAA: Past Decade Warmest on Record According to Scientists in 48 Countries; Earth has been growing warmer for more than fifty years
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2010/20100728_stateoftheclimate.html


http://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/cmb/bams-sotc/2009/bams-sotc-2009-brochure-lo-rez.pdf

http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/emis/overview_2006.html

http://www.bgc.mpg.de/service/iso_gas_lab/publications/PG_WB_IJMS.pdf

http://bluemoon.ucsd.edu/publications/manning/ManningandKeeling2006.pdf

http://www.skepticalscience.com/Are-humans-too-insignificant-to-affect-global-climate.htm

http://www.eumetsat.eu/Home/Main/Publications/Conference_and_Workshop_Proceedings/groups/cps/documents/document/pdf_conf_p50_s9_01_harries_v.pdf

http://ams.confex.com/ams/Annual2006/techprogram/paper_100737.htm

http://www.skepticalscience.com/empirical-evidence-for-co2-enhanced-greenhouse-effect.htm
12-05-2011 08:41
hotair
☆☆☆☆☆
(11)
Hayduke: Its anthropogenic. You can read about it in the IPCC FAQs. Or you can track down some real papers on the subject.

To identify what the source of the carbon was, they carbon dated the atmosphere. If old carbon were to be introduced to the atmosphere, the readings would decline. (Because the carbon being put in the atmosphere would have a lower radioactive component. Older Carbon, lower C14.)

Other sources are easier to identify.. deforestation.. etc.
23-08-2013 22:58
Enviro0801
☆☆☆☆☆
(5)
I agree with the underlying theory here. Atmospheric CO2 is increasing, and CO2 traps heat in the troposphere. The earth is a dynamic system, however. When it comes to energy budget alone, there are dozens of factors to consider. There was only one skeptical argument I've come across that made me stop and think. I can't find the guy right now, but he was a scientist in a semi-relevant field. He basically argued that the net feedback from clouds is complex and not well understood. Clouds supposedly have counteracting feedback mechanisms to solar energy. There is water vapor, which is of course a strong greenhouse gas, but also aerosols in clouds. Aerosols play a duel role of absorb/scattering incoming solar radiation back out to space, and expanding cloud surface area to block some of the incoming radiation (mostly visible light, if not all). There are also a large variety of clouds to make it more complicated. More heat = more clouds. Do these clouds have a net cooling or heating effect? So it was an interesting assertion, sorry I can't remember the details, but that is an example of the skepticism I welcome with open arms. It's quite a complicated topic, which means it's fun haha.




Join the debate It's mostly due to human-produced CO2 (Carbon Dioxide):

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
carbon database for household goods and services1822-11-2022 04:36
Fossil Fuel Substitution for reduced emission of CO2, mercury, lead, arsenic, cadmium..32923-09-2022 20:57
Maximizing Carbon Sequestration in Terrestrial Agroecosystems48126-08-2022 17:20
The Next Big Money Evolution Will Be Printing International Money Via Human Intelligence013-08-2022 06:17
CO2 Is Helping the Ozone Layer to Recover113-08-2022 05:54
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact