Climate Philosophy

Climate-Debate.com > Discussion Forum > Climate Philosophy


Philosophical, ethical, theoretical and religious perspectives on the climate debate.

	Subject	Views	Replies	Last post
	Who do the denialist trolls really hurt?	14238	12	12-08-2023
	Is our world condemned?	18007	21	15-05-2023
	I Love Greta Thunberg - do you?	6832	33	07-04-2022
	Climate - (Side: 1 2)	14335	48	29-01-2021
	Understanding aspects of human induced climate changes through belief	13598	8	23-08-2019
	Is there a Jewish Point of View?	14541	3	02-02-2019
	Stream of thought poem re: London snow storms/Garbage Island	13385	0	02-02-2019
	Is M2C2 a matter of the method of interpretation?	14315	2	23-10-2018
	Climate change is unavoidable, so is a warmer or cooler climate more desireable? - (Side: 1 2)	19903	62	23-10-2018
	Richard Lindzen paid by ExxonMobil for his lies	17157	3	23-10-2018
	Why doesn't Exxon sell cigarettes?	15392	19	16-09-2016
	Philosophically speaking, where to M2C2 denialists come from?	14784	6	21-11-2015
	When it comes to M2C2, is planet Earth really worth saving?	14377	5	22-10-2015
	Are falsifiable models the only way to validate science?	16801	33	18-10-2015
	M2C2 - where all or nothing means nothing	14514	3	17-10-2015
	Are you a theologian or scientist? Ask Karl Popper. - (Side: 1 2)	22795	54	12-10-2015

- Open Thread with new posts since last visit (

- 20 or more )

- Open Thread with no new posts since last visit.

- Locked Thread.

- Sticky Thread.

Join the debate Climate Philosophy:

▲ Top of page

Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact