TEMPERATURE DATA released for 2017

litesong wrote:
https://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-blogs/climatechange/noaa-releases-their-global-temperature-data-for-2017/70003936
Notes:
2017 was the warmest non-El Nino year on record.
2017 was the 41st consecutive year that the global land/ocean temperature was above the 20th century average(since 1976).
Top six warmest years on record have all occurred since 2010.
So far this century, the annual global average temperature has been broken five times.
The annual global land/ocean temperature has increased at a rate of 0.07 deg. C. per decade since 1880. However, the average rate increase is twice as much since 1980.
Nine of the top 10 warmest years on record have all occurred since 2005.

litesong wrote:

litesong wrote:
https://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-blogs/climatechange/noaa-releases-their-global-temperature-data-for-2017/70003936
Notes:
2017 was the warmest non-El Nino year on record.
2017 was the 41st consecutive year that the global land/ocean temperature was above the 20th century average(since 1976).
Top six warmest years on record have all occurred since 2010.
So far this century, the annual global average temperature has been broken five times.
The annual global land/ocean temperature has increased at a rate of 0.07 deg. C. per decade since 1880. However, the average rate increase is twice as much since 1980.
Nine of the top 10 warmest years on record have all occurred since 2005.

Oh, yeah. The solar TSI has been languid for half a century, & low for 11+ years (including a 3+ years low TSI, setting a 100 year record).
However, as stated ALL years since 1976 have been over the 20th century average. Reinforcing that data, is no month has been below the 20th century average for 395+ months (back to 1986?).

Wake wrote:
And yet if you go to the many cities weather sites and look for record highs, lows and rainfall you discover that the last 40 years show exactly what the satellite record does - nothing out of the ordinary.

Into the Night wrote:

Wake wrote:
And yet if you go to the many cities weather sites and look for record highs, lows and rainfall you discover that the last 40 years show exactly what the satellite record does - nothing out of the ordinary.

Satellites are incapable of measuring temperature. They can only measure light. You don't know the emissivity of the Earth or of any city on Earth.

"old sick silly sleep sleezy slimy slimebarf steenkin' stuttering filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner & many time threatener(plus 1) wake-me-up" wiffed:

litesong wrote:

litesong wrote:
https://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-blogs/climatechange/noaa-releases-their-global-temperature-data-for-2017/70003936
Notes:
2017 was the warmest non-El Nino year on record.
2017 was the 41st consecutive year that the global land/ocean temperature was above the 20th century average(since 1976).
Top six warmest years on record have all occurred since 2010.
So far this century, the annual global average temperature has been broken five times.
The annual global land/ocean temperature has increased at a rate of 0.07 deg. C. per decade since 1880. However, the average rate increase is twice as much since 1980.
Nine of the top 10 warmest years on record have all occurred since 2005.

Oh, yeah. The solar TSI has been languid for half a century, & low for 11+ years (including a 3+ years low TSI, setting a 100 year record).
However, as stated ALL years since 1976 have been over the 20th century average. Reinforcing that data, is no month has been below the 20th century average for 395+ straight months (back to 1986?).

..... he things(wake is thinking of its thing...its tiny thing) that a couple of warm years equals global warming.

Wake wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Wake wrote:
And yet if you go to the many cities weather sites and look for record highs, lows and rainfall you discover that the last 40 years show exactly what the satellite record does - nothing out of the ordinary.

Satellites are incapable of measuring temperature. They can only measure light. You don't know the emissivity of the Earth or of any city on Earth.

Since you haven't the slightest clue what you're talking about do ahead and tell everyone that if you measure the temperature in your back yard in two places that means that you can't average the temperature.

We need more stupid bull crap from idiots like you.

Into the Night wrote:

Wake wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Wake wrote:
And yet if you go to the many cities weather sites and look for record highs, lows and rainfall you discover that the last 40 years show exactly what the satellite record does - nothing out of the ordinary.

Satellites are incapable of measuring temperature. They can only measure light. You don't know the emissivity of the Earth or of any city on Earth.

Since you haven't the slightest clue what you're talking about do ahead and tell everyone that if you measure the temperature in your back yard in two places that means that you can't average the temperature.

We need more stupid bull crap from idiots like you.

A simple average is not a statistical analysis. It is YOU that does not know what he is talking about. Go learn what statistical mathematics is all about.

Wake wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Wake wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Wake wrote:
And yet if you go to the many cities weather sites and look for record highs, lows and rainfall you discover that the last 40 years show exactly what the satellite record does - nothing out of the ordinary.

Satellites are incapable of measuring temperature. They can only measure light. You don't know the emissivity of the Earth or of any city on Earth.

Since you haven't the slightest clue what you're talking about do ahead and tell everyone that if you measure the temperature in your back yard in two places that means that you can't average the temperature.

We need more stupid bull crap from idiots like you.

A simple average is not a statistical analysis. It is YOU that does not know what he is talking about. Go learn what statistical mathematics is all about.

Why is it that every time I ask you what you think "statistical average" is that you tell me that you defined it before? So you two bit moron - define it or shut the F up.

Into the Night wrote:

Wake wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Wake wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Wake wrote:
And yet if you go to the many cities weather sites and look for record highs, lows and rainfall you discover that the last 40 years show exactly what the satellite record does - nothing out of the ordinary.

Satellites are incapable of measuring temperature. They can only measure light. You don't know the emissivity of the Earth or of any city on Earth.

Since you haven't the slightest clue what you're talking about do ahead and tell everyone that if you measure the temperature in your back yard in two places that means that you can't average the temperature.

We need more stupid bull crap from idiots like you.

A simple average is not a statistical analysis. It is YOU that does not know what he is talking about. Go learn what statistical mathematics is all about.

Why is it that every time I ask you what you think "statistical average" is that you tell me that you defined it before? So you two bit moron - define it or shut the F up.

Because I have defined it before...responding to your posts...multiple times.

Argument of the Stone.

I'm not going to write such a book for you here on climate-debate. I have given you some of it already. You go do your footwork now. You go study up on random number mathematics, probability mathematics, and finally statistical mathematics.

Stop being a moron and assuming that a simple average is statistical math.

Stop being a moron and assuming that you know how many thermometers are in the world.

Stop being a moron and recognize there is such a thing as potential temperature gradient, that a margin of error is calculated from.

Stop being a moron and recognize the location, location grouping, and time are influencing aspects of the data that must be eliminated.

Wake wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Wake wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Wake wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Wake wrote:
And yet if you go to the many cities weather sites and look for record highs, lows and rainfall you discover that the last 40 years show exactly what the satellite record does - nothing out of the ordinary.

Satellites are incapable of measuring temperature. They can only measure light. You don't know the emissivity of the Earth or of any city on Earth.

Since you haven't the slightest clue what you're talking about do ahead and tell everyone that if you measure the temperature in your back yard in two places that means that you can't average the temperature.

We need more stupid bull crap from idiots like you.

A simple average is not a statistical analysis. It is YOU that does not know what he is talking about. Go learn what statistical mathematics is all about.

Why is it that every time I ask you what you think "statistical average" is that you tell me that you defined it before? So you two bit moron - define it or shut the F up.

Because I have defined it before...responding to your posts...multiple times.

Argument of the Stone.

I'm not going to write such a book for you here on climate-debate. I have given you some of it already. You go do your footwork now. You go study up on random number mathematics, probability mathematics, and finally statistical mathematics.

Stop being a moron and assuming that a simple average is statistical math.

Stop being a moron and assuming that you know how many thermometers are in the world.

Stop being a moron and recognize there is such a thing as potential temperature gradient, that a margin of error is calculated from.

Stop being a moron and recognize the location, location grouping, and time are influencing aspects of the data that must be eliminated.

As is usual you claim to know something and don't. You aren't fooling anyone.

Into the Night wrote:

Wake wrote:
As is usual you claim to know something and don't. You aren't fooling anyone.

As usual, you decide to ignore the math and remain a moron.