Nukes are hoax

Little Boy contained 64 kilograms (141 lb) of highly enriched uranium, although less than a kilogram underwent nuclear fission. Its components were fabricated at three different plants so that no one would have a copy of the complete design. Unlike the implosion design, which required sophisticated coordination of shaped explosive charges, the gun-type design was considered almost certain to work so it was never tested before its first use at Hiroshima.

Xadoman wrote:
I have been reading a lot of forums lately. Turns out that nuclear bombs are hoax.

From wiki:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Boy

Little Boy contained 64 kilograms (141 lb) of highly enriched uranium, although less than a kilogram underwent nuclear fission. Its components were fabricated at three different plants so that no one would have a copy of the complete design. Unlike the implosion design, which required sophisticated coordination of shaped explosive charges, the gun-type design was considered almost certain to work so it was never tested before its first use at Hiroshima.

So it was never tested but worked like a swiss clock.

I have seen pictures taken after the supposed explosion and there was no "bald spot". Telephone posts ant electrical post were also standing. They should have been annihilated and turned to dust but they were not.

Nuclear bomb simply is not physically possible. There is no explosion if you put 2 metals together for "critical mass". Another fairytale to control the sheep and to milk money endlessly.


What a hoax. Beautiful. I fell for it and everybody I know have also fallen for it.

Xadoman wrote:
I have been reading a lot of forums lately. Turns out that nuclear bombs are hoax.

From wiki:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Boy

Little Boy contained 64 kilograms (141 lb) of highly enriched uranium, although less than a kilogram underwent nuclear fission. Its components were fabricated at three different plants so that no one would have a copy of the complete design. Unlike the implosion design, which required sophisticated coordination of shaped explosive charges, the gun-type design was considered almost certain to work so it was never tested before its first use at Hiroshima.

So it was never tested but worked like a swiss clock.

I have seen pictures taken after the supposed explosion and there was no "bald spot". Telephone posts ant electrical post were also standing. They should have been annihilated and turned to dust but they were not.

Nuclear bomb simply is not physically possible. There is no explosion if you put 2 metals together for "critical mass". Another fairytale to control the sheep and to milk money endlessly.


What a hoax. Beautiful. I fell for it and everybody I know have also fallen for it.

Xadoman wrote: I have been reading a lot of forums lately. Turns out that nuclear bombs are hoax.

What a hoax. Beautiful. I fell for it and everybody I know have also fallen for it.

Little Boy contained 64 kilograms (141 lb) of highly enriched uranium, although less than a kilogram underwent nuclear fission. Its components were fabricated at three different plants so that no one would have a copy of the complete design. Unlike the implosion design, which required sophisticated coordination of shaped explosive charges, the gun-type design was considered almost certain to work so it was never tested before its first use at Hiroshima.

Xadoman wrote:
Once again for Swannie and IbdaMann:

Little Boy contained 64 kilograms (141 lb) of highly enriched uranium, although less than a kilogram underwent nuclear fission. Its components were fabricated at three different plants so that no one would have a copy of the complete design. Unlike the implosion design, which required sophisticated coordination of shaped explosive charges, the gun-type design was considered almost certain to work so it was never tested before its first use at Hiroshima.

I am sure that happened

For those who do not know what "gun type" means : they use conventional explosives in one side of a big barrel to shoot one portion of nuclear mass towards the other portion of nuclear mass and there will be supposedly a giant explosion if two metals come together( they have a critical mass buzzword for this)

Imagine that such a simple device needed years and years of calculations and they even builded a complete town for that costing billions of dollars. Do not you see that this was just a money grab? Like all hoaxes somebody is filling their pockets hard.

The soviets tested their bomb already in 1949. It took them only 4 years to build their own but we are suppose to belive that some countries and terrorists are still struggling to build one 70 years later having all the accumulated knowledge from internet and computing power available today. Remember, they used punch cards to compute back then

Even the shittest smart phone is millions of times more powerful than a computer back in their time.

They do not build it because it is not possible. Metals do not explode if you bring them together.


So overall as we can see it is a hoax. If you have 30 kg of plutonium etc in one hand and 31 kg in other hand and then bring those metals together then there will be no explosion. Common sense, nothing more.

Chernobyl was not a nuclear explosion. A simple water boiler can explode if the pressure goes two high. That does not mean there is a nuclear explosion.


It is a hoax to grab money endlessly. Beautiful, I must say. Everybody have fallen for it. The bigger the lie, the more they fall.

James_ wrote:

Xadoman wrote:
Once again for Swannie and IbdaMann:

Little Boy contained 64 kilograms (141 lb) of highly enriched uranium, although less than a kilogram underwent nuclear fission. Its components were fabricated at three different plants so that no one would have a copy of the complete design. Unlike the implosion design, which required sophisticated coordination of shaped explosive charges, the gun-type design was considered almost certain to work so it was never tested before its first use at Hiroshima.

I am sure that happened

For those who do not know what "gun type" means : they use conventional explosives in one side of a big barrel to shoot one portion of nuclear mass towards the other portion of nuclear mass and there will be supposedly a giant explosion if two metals come together( they have a critical mass buzzword for this)

Imagine that such a simple device needed years and years of calculations and they even builded a complete town for that costing billions of dollars. Do not you see that this was just a money grab? Like all hoaxes somebody is filling their pockets hard.

The soviets tested their bomb already in 1949. It took them only 4 years to build their own but we are suppose to belive that some countries and terrorists are still struggling to build one 70 years later having all the accumulated knowledge from internet and computing power available today. Remember, they used punch cards to compute back then

Even the shittest smart phone is millions of times more powerful than a computer back in their time.

They do not build it because it is not possible. Metals do not explode if you bring them together.


So overall as we can see it is a hoax. If you have 30 kg of plutonium etc in one hand and 31 kg in other hand and then bring those metals together then there will be no explosion. Common sense, nothing more.

Chernobyl was not a nuclear explosion. A simple water boiler can explode if the pressure goes two high. That does not mean there is a nuclear explosion.


It is a hoax to grab money endlessly. Beautiful, I must say. Everybody have fallen for it. The bigger the lie, the more they fall.

A super collider is used to get 2 gold elements to collide (they can use other elements). Swan will show you a picture.

IBdaMann wrote:

Xadoman wrote: I have been reading a lot of forums lately. Turns out that nuclear bombs are hoax.

What a hoax. Beautiful. I fell for it and everybody I know have also fallen for it.

Let's see, nukes are a hoax but crypto is legit! Xadoman, I should listen to you more often.

Do you know what's in this picture? That's right, a bunch of hoaxes.

Xadoman wrote:
Atomic bomb bases on theory that smashing two metals together will create an epic explosion which will wipe off entire city. That was Little Boy s working principle which was never tested before dropping it on Hiroshima.

The Nagasaki got hammered with Fat man. This time they had another working principle - supposedly covering a metal with conventional explosives and detonating those will pressure the metal to double density and then the violent chain reaction would start causing an epic explosion which will wipe off an entire city.

What a hoax. Atomic energy is not explosive in nature. The exponential chain reaction is not going to happen. The bomb is a hoax. Chernobyl and fukushima were a simple melt down. No explosion. No bald spot and crater there. Even a wood boiler could explode if pressure goes too high. That does not mean it was a nuclear bomb.

Terrorists would constantly wipe off big areas if the atomic bomb would work. Todays know how and computing power is millions and millions of times ahead of what they had 70 years ago.

But there are no explosions which will simply mean that the atomic bomb is a hoax.

Also, the conventional explosives cause a blast because they create a lot of gases which will expand and cause a shock wave. Nuclear explosion would not cause such a blast because there are no such gases being produced in the process. Nuclear explosion could only cause a violent heating of the nuclear mass which would heat the atmosphere that simply absorbs the energy and dissipates it causing a 0,000000000000001 degree rise in temperature in nearby city.

What a hoax. IBdaMann should update his politiplex cite with this hoax.

I think Japan's surrender is proof that there is no hoax.

Xadoman wrote:

I think Japan's surrender is proof that there is no hoax.

Japan s cities were carpet bombed with napalm and destroyed. They were already lost long before the supposed atomic attack. They needed a way out and nuclear hoax was a convinient way for all participants. The goverments all play the game at highest level together and feed the propaganda to the masses. Those who questioned the atomic attack were shoot on site.

How come Russia already tested their atomic bomb in 1949 when modern day terrorist still can not figure it out 70+ years later with all the knowledge and computing power available today. Just think about it logically.

Do you belive that a terrorist would give a damn about MAD ( mutually assured destruction)? I do not think so. They would use everything to blow up big areas.

But they do not because atomic bomb is not possible. The exponential chain reaction is not possible. It is a fairy tale which does not happen in nature.

Hydrogen bomb is another hoax. It uses fission bomb as a starter pack but the fission bomb itself is a hoax. So there is no explosion. All just a hoax.

Do not belive anything that the goverment tries to shove down your throat. 99% is a lie just to fill the pockets of the ruling class. Nothing more.

Article 39

The Security Council shall determine the existence of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression and shall make recommendations, or decide what measures shall be taken in accordance with Articles 4 and 42, to maintain or restore international peace and security.
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/unchart.asp#art39

I like science and can assure you nuclear weapons are real

In Hiroshima I was prepared for radically different sights. But, to my surprise, Hiroshima looked exactly like all the other burned-out cities in Japan.

There was a familiar pink blot, about two miles in diameter. It was dotted with charred trees and telephone poles. Only one of the cities twenty bridges was down. Hiroshima's clusters of modern buildings in the downtown section stood upright.

It was obvious that the blast could not have been so powerful as we had been led to believe. It was extensive blast rather than intensive.

I had heard of buildings instantly consumed by unprecedented heat. Yet here I saw the buildings structurally intact, and what is more, topped by undamaged flag poles, lightning rods, painted railings, air raid precaution signs and other comparatively fragile objects.

At the T-bridge, the aiming point for the atomic bomb, I looked for the "bald spot" where everything presumably had been vaporized in the twinkling of an eye. It wasn't there or anywhere else. I could find no traces of unusual phenomena.

What I did see was in substance a replica of Yokohama or Osaka, or the Tokyo suburbs - the familiar residue of an area of wood and brick houses razed by uncontrollable fire. Everywhere I saw the trunks of charred and leafless trees, burned and unburned chunks of wood. The fire had been intense enough to bend and twist steel girders and to melt glass until it ran like lava - just as in other Japanese cities.

The concrete buildings nearest to the center of explosion, some only a few blocks from the heart of the atom blast, showed no structural damage. Even cornices, canopies and delicate exterior decorations were intact. Window glass was shattered, of course, but single-panel frames held firm; only window frames of two or more panels were bent and buckled. The blast impact therefore could not have been unusual.

Then I questioned a great many people who were inside such buildings when the bomb exploded. Their descriptions matched the scores of accounts I had heard from people caught in concrete buildings in areas hit by blockbusters. Hiroshima's ten-story press building, about three blocks from the center of the explosion, was badly gutted by the fire following the explosion, but otherwise unhurt. The people caught in the building did not suffer any unusual effects.

Most of the window panels were blown out of the Hiroshima hospital, about a mile from the heart of the explosion. Because there were no wooden structures nearby, however, it escaped fire. The people inside the hospital were not seriously affected by the blast. In general the effects here were analogous to those produced by the blast of a distant TNT bomb.

The total death, destruction and horror in Hiroshima were as great as reported. But the character of the damage was in no sense unique; neither the blast nor the heat was so tremendous as generally assumed.

TOKYO, Nov. 2 (AP)--Maj. Alexander P. de Seversky declared today that the fearsome atomic bomb that hastened Japan's defeat could kill no more people than a regular ten-ton bomb if dropped on United States cities of steel and concrete.

Xadoman wrote:

'ATOMIC BOMB HYSTERIA'
By Major Alexander P. de Seversky

https://www.nytimes.com/1945/11/03/archives/seversky-limits-atom-bomb-power-likens-hiroshima-blow-to-one-by-200.html

TOKYO, Nov. 2 (AP)--Maj. Alexander P. de Seversky declared today that the fearsome atomic bomb that hastened Japan's defeat could kill no more people than a regular ten-ton bomb if dropped on United States cities of steel and concrete.

Seversky was a guy who flew over the Hiroshima and Nagasaki with aeroplane just after the attack and witnessed the destruction by his own eyes. As you can see the damage was similar to other Japan s cities. No bald spot, not crater , nothing that was expected to happen. Atomic bomb is a hoax. A propaganda. Nothing more. A hoax to milk money endlessly for the ruling class.

Atomic bombs do not exist. Simple as that.

Xadoman wrote:

Seversky was a guy who flew over the Hiroshima and Nagasaki with aeroplane just after the attack and witnessed the destruction by his own eyes. As you can see the damage was similar to other Japan s cities. No bald spot, not crater , nothing that was expected to happen. Atomic bomb is a hoax. A propaganda. Nothing more. A hoax to milk money endlessly for the ruling class.

Atomic bombs do not exist. Simple as that.

Ukraine still controls nine operational reactors and has significant nuclear expertise despite having given up the world's third largest nuclear arsenal in 1996. The report says: "The weight of reactor plutonium available to Ukraine can be estimated at seven tons ... A significant nuclear weapons arsenal would require much less material ... the amount of material is sufficient for hundreds of warheads with a tactical yield of several kilotons."

Extremely high tolerance you say... Maybe you should google evolution of attainable machining accuracy and compare 1945 to 2020. "Ultra precision" accuracy was around 0,1 micrometers during 1945. Today 0,5 micrometers accuracy is called "normal", 0,005 micrometers accuracy is called "precision machining" and 0,0003 micrometers accuracy is called "ultra precision machining".

So today's ordinary machining tools are already damn close what was best you could get 1945 when first implosion bombs were made. So no, high tolerances are not the issue.

Xadoman wrote:
I have been reading a lot of forums lately. Turns out that nuclear bombs are hoax.

From wiki:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Boy

Little Boy contained 64 kilograms (141 lb) of highly enriched uranium, although less than a kilogram underwent nuclear fission. Its components were fabricated at three different plants so that no one would have a copy of the complete design. Unlike the implosion design, which required sophisticated coordination of shaped explosive charges, the gun-type design was considered almost certain to work so it was never tested before its first use at Hiroshima.

So it was never tested but worked like a swiss clock.

I have seen pictures taken after the supposed explosion and there was no "bald spot". Telephone posts ant electrical post were also standing. They should have been annihilated and turned to dust but they were not.

Nuclear bomb simply is not physically possible. There is no explosion if you put 2 metals together for "critical mass". Another fairytale to control the sheep and to milk money endlessly.


What a hoax. Beautiful. I fell for it and everybody I know have also fallen for it.

Xadoman wrote:
Does everybody know that bank in Hiro was opened 2 days after the explosion. The trams were running 3 days after. Old pictures show that electric poles and trees were standing still just after the explosion. Nothing got vaporized there. Roads on the ground were intact. No crater. No bald spot.
83000 people turned to live Hiro just after the bombing. In February 1946 the population in Hiro was already 169000. In 1955 already 500000 people lived in Hiro. In 1964 the population rised over 1 million people.
You see Hiro and Naga got populated very quickly.

Did you also know that the Chernobyl power station continued to produce electricity till 2000 and was only closed because of external pressure. It shows that the concerns about the dangers of radioactivity are greatly overhyped.

Galen Winsor was a nuclear specialist and engineer and has made videos of licking uranium dust. He also swam in cooling water of the reactor and even drink the water from it. Just to show to the regulators that the radioactivity fear is overhyped. He and his team barehandedly built the nuclear arsenal of US before the regulators got into the business.

Gun type bomb that was used in Hiro was never tested. Wiki says: " it was assumed almost certainly to work". I am sure that happened.

Implosion type bomb supposedly compressed plutonium metal to double density with conventional explosives. Do you belive that a metal could be compressed to double density? Metal is solid and would not compress like a gas.

Also, the velocity of gases and debris from conventional explosives is around 4km/s to 10 km/s. The 6 kg of plutonium inside the bomb was inside 120 kg and 7cm thick uranium shell which itself was inside 120 kg duraluminium shell. The conventional explosives supposedly needed to schock vaporize those shells to reach to the plutonium and to the beryllium pellet inside the plutonium .

Now consider that the apollo tin can space capsule entered the atmosphere at 11 km/s and was violently braked down in 5 minutes and did not ever overheat or got compressed to double density. It did not vaporized although spent 5 minutes in violent atmospheric drag. This kind of braking is equivalent to 250 tons of rocket fuel burned in the rocket engine to brake the capsule down from 11 km/s.

Why should we belive that 120 kg 7 cm thick uranium shell covered with 120 kg duraluminium shell hollow kettlebell with 6 kg plutonium inside would even vaporize with conventional explosives giving expanding gas velocities around 8 km/s. I myself do not belive it would vaporize.

The explosion would simply mirror from the duraluminium and uranium shell and move towards empty atmosphere.

Also, does anybody remember Jumbo. The 200 ton metallic nuclear condom to prevent rare element plutonium to spread all over the place if the test bomb would only fizzle. It was built , it was dragged to place and eventually they did not use it because as explained" we had enough plutonium eventually and we do not want to spread another 200 tons of radiactive materials into the atmosphere".

In reality they chickened out because the one foot thick walled Jumbo would not simply vaporize. So they dragged it away and built a platform for it to suspend it in the air. After the explosion it simply fell down but otherwise it was completely intact. No scratch, no nothing. They even wanted to destroy it with conventional explosives but only managed to blow off side caps, nothing more. Remember , modern tank weigh also 50 , 70 tons. If Jumbo got no scratces then modern tanks would also be fine. No vaporization , nothing.


So, in overall, nukes are hoax. Beautiful scam to milk taxpayers money endlessly.

Cold war was also hoax. Russia was starving and US sent goverment subsidized grain there to help out.

At 8:15am on August 6, 1945, a flash ran across the skies of Hiroshima. 90% of the trains were destroyed, and many lives were lost. However, the streetcars started running just 3 days after the atomic bombing. These are the "bombed trains" that are still running today.

Xadoman wrote:
https://grapeejapan.com/56034

At 8:15am on August 6, 1945, a flash ran across the skies of Hiroshima. 90% of the trains were destroyed, and many lives were lost. However, the streetcars started running just 3 days after the atomic bombing. These are the "bombed trains" that are still running today.

As you can see, some of them still run even today.

Nukes are a complete hoax and money scam to milk taxpayers. Nothing more. They do not exist, simple as that.

Swan wrote:

Xadoman wrote:
I have been reading a lot of forums lately. Turns out that nuclear bombs are hoax.

From wiki:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Boy

Little Boy contained 64 kilograms (141 lb) of highly enriched uranium, although less than a kilogram underwent nuclear fission. Its components were fabricated at three different plants so that no one would have a copy of the complete design. Unlike the implosion design, which required sophisticated coordination of shaped explosive charges, the gun-type design was considered almost certain to work so it was never tested before its first use at Hiroshima.

So it was never tested but worked like a swiss clock.

I have seen pictures taken after the supposed explosion and there was no "bald spot". Telephone posts ant electrical post were also standing. They should have been annihilated and turned to dust but they were not.

Nuclear bomb simply is not physically possible. There is no explosion if you put 2 metals together for "critical mass". Another fairytale to control the sheep and to milk money endlessly.


What a hoax. Beautiful. I fell for it and everybody I know have also fallen for it.

The entire internet is a hoax

While the city was substantially destroyed by the atomic bomb dropped on 6 August 1945, amazingly the trams were operating again only 3 days later. Almost as surprising is that the tram system today uses almost the same lines as in 1945, according to this webpage.

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Xadoman wrote:
I have been reading a lot of forums lately. Turns out that nuclear bombs are hoax.

From wiki:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Boy

Little Boy contained 64 kilograms (141 lb) of highly enriched uranium, although less than a kilogram underwent nuclear fission. Its components were fabricated at three different plants so that no one would have a copy of the complete design. Unlike the implosion design, which required sophisticated coordination of shaped explosive charges, the gun-type design was considered almost certain to work so it was never tested before its first use at Hiroshima.

So it was never tested but worked like a swiss clock.

I have seen pictures taken after the supposed explosion and there was no "bald spot". Telephone posts ant electrical post were also standing. They should have been annihilated and turned to dust but they were not.

Nuclear bomb simply is not physically possible. There is no explosion if you put 2 metals together for "critical mass". Another fairytale to control the sheep and to milk money endlessly.


What a hoax. Beautiful. I fell for it and everybody I know have also fallen for it.

The entire internet is a hoax

I thought Al Gore invented it

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Xadoman wrote:
I have been reading a lot of forums lately. Turns out that nuclear bombs are hoax.

From wiki:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Boy

Little Boy contained 64 kilograms (141 lb) of highly enriched uranium, although less than a kilogram underwent nuclear fission. Its components were fabricated at three different plants so that no one would have a copy of the complete design. Unlike the implosion design, which required sophisticated coordination of shaped explosive charges, the gun-type design was considered almost certain to work so it was never tested before its first use at Hiroshima.

So it was never tested but worked like a swiss clock.

I have seen pictures taken after the supposed explosion and there was no "bald spot". Telephone posts ant electrical post were also standing. They should have been annihilated and turned to dust but they were not.

Nuclear bomb simply is not physically possible. There is no explosion if you put 2 metals together for "critical mass". Another fairytale to control the sheep and to milk money endlessly.


What a hoax. Beautiful. I fell for it and everybody I know have also fallen for it.

The entire internet is a hoax

I thought Al Gore invented it

Gore was an acid tester for Gerry Garcia

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Spongy Iris wrote:

Swan wrote:

Xadoman wrote:
I have been reading a lot of forums lately. Turns out that nuclear bombs are hoax.

From wiki:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Boy

Little Boy contained 64 kilograms (141 lb) of highly enriched uranium, although less than a kilogram underwent nuclear fission. Its components were fabricated at three different plants so that no one would have a copy of the complete design. Unlike the implosion design, which required sophisticated coordination of shaped explosive charges, the gun-type design was considered almost certain to work so it was never tested before its first use at Hiroshima.

So it was never tested but worked like a swiss clock.

I have seen pictures taken after the supposed explosion and there was no "bald spot". Telephone posts ant electrical post were also standing. They should have been annihilated and turned to dust but they were not.

Nuclear bomb simply is not physically possible. There is no explosion if you put 2 metals together for "critical mass". Another fairytale to control the sheep and to milk money endlessly.


What a hoax. Beautiful. I fell for it and everybody I know have also fallen for it.

The entire internet is a hoax

I thought Al Gore invented it

Gore was an acid tester for Gerry Garcia

Like the Grateful Dead, and this chat room, the internet is dead.

Check how often people over 40 post anything new on Facebook. Practically NEVER.

Only frequent posters are agents and bots.

https://theconversation.com/the-dead-internet-theory-makes-eerie-claims-about-an-ai-run-web-the-truth-is-more-sinister-229609