"It's the sun!" was refuted more than 20 years ago
| "It's the sun!" was refuted more than 20 years ago15-02-2011 04:05 | |
Desertphile ☆☆☆☆☆(33) |
 Solar irradiance data: yhttp://www.mps.mpg.de/projects/sun-climate/data/tsi_1611.txt ftp://ftp.pmodwrc.ch/pub/data/irradiance/composite/DataPlots/composite_d41_62_1009.dat Global temperature data: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata/GLB.Ts+dSST.txt |
| RE: Solar influence15-02-2011 18:31 | |
| Hayduke☆☆☆☆☆ (21) |
There is much more to the sun's effect on Earth climate than irradiance. This is merely a straw dog to draw attention away from the real influence of cosmic cycles. See the work of Akasofu, for example. |
| 15-02-2011 21:08 | |
| Desertphile☆☆☆☆☆ (33) |
Hayduke wrote: There is much more to the sun's effect on Earth climate than irradiance. This is merely a straw dog to draw attention away from the real influence of cosmic cycles. See the work of Akasofu, for example. The hypothesis "it's cosmic rays" was refuted more than eight years ago. THE TROPOSPHERE IS HEATING WHILE THE STRATOSPHERE IS COOLING. Sheeesh. The atmosphere even heats more at night than it used to several decades ago. Only greenhouse gases explain these facts: cosmic rays do not. A few peer-reviewed science papers published in refereed science journals that show cosmic rays did not and are not causing the current unprecedented rate of warming: http://www.mps.mpg.de/dokumente/publikationen/solanki/r47.pdf http://stephenschneider.stanford.edu/Publications/PDF_Papers/Laut2003.pdf No correlation between cosmic rays and Earth's temperature: http://www.eiscat.rl.ac.uk/Members/mike/publications/pdfs/2001/196_Lockwood_2000JA000115.pdf  http://ulysses.sr.unh.edu/NeutronMonitor/Misc/neutron2.html In fact, periods of increased cosmic rays show no correlation with Earth warming: http://www.warwickhughes.com/agri/lockwood2007.pdf http://www.nasa.gov/topics/solarsystem/features/ray_surge.html More papers that refuted the hypothesis: http://arxiv.org/pdf/0803.2298 http://atmos-chem-phys.net/8/7373/2008/acp-8-7373-2008.pdf http://www.eawag.ch/organisation/abteilungen/surf/publikationen/2010_calogovic.pdf http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/1885/2010/acp-10-1885-2010.html http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0706/0706.4294v1.pdf Go, and sin no more. |
| RE: Cosmic Rays15-02-2011 23:19 | |
| Hayduke☆☆☆☆☆ (21) |
Desertphile wrote: I said nothing about cosmic rays. |
| 05-05-2014 11:23 | |
| Kano☆☆☆☆☆ (23) |
There is more to solar cycles than TSI YES. There is UV which changes quite a bit up to 6% The solar magnetic AP index Solar wind. CERN's experiments are proving cosmic rays do affect cloud formation. |
Join the debate "It's the sun!" was refuted more than 20 years ago:
Related content
| Threads | Replies | Last post |
| Would You Join A New Secret Society Help Humans Live To At Least 200 Years And More ? | 2 | 03-01-2024 20:18 |
| Red Sun Images in England | 8 | 11-08-2023 22:20 |
| The retards at FOX news claim 74 year old rapist teacher faces 600 years behind bars | 0 | 04-08-2023 23:48 |
| Another dead retard with a gun. I worked on highways for 37 years and never did this | 0 | 29-03-2023 13:24 |
| Is the sun toxic? | 293 | 23-10-2022 17:21 |