Remember me
▼ Content

Incredible News! Climate Change Really *was* Just a Hoax *all along*!


Incredible News! Climate Change Really *was* Just a Hoax *all along*!21-08-2012 04:06
blissdragon
☆☆☆☆☆
(5)
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/07/03/bill-mckibben-on-the-global-warming-hoax.html

Cut and paste the link...great article!



blissdragon
www.pacingtheplanet.org
13-02-2013 09:21
Adword
☆☆☆☆☆
(2)
We need to control global-warming by using no polluted source like solar energy.
18-02-2013 07:37
fullcircleltd
☆☆☆☆☆
(2)
Adword wrote:
We need to control global-warming by using no polluted source like solar energy.


I am also agree with Adword.


26-02-2013 08:15
lovingrose
☆☆☆☆☆
(3)
We should be attentive to preserve our earth. See for more
http://astraunic.com/2013/02/26/climate-changes/
05-03-2013 09:57
Phil
☆☆☆☆☆
(8)
Nice post.

we should use non-polluted sources like solar energy this will reduce global-warming.
09-10-2013 15:42
Tim the plumber
★★★★☆
(1361)
blissdragon wrote:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/07/03/bill-mckibben-on-the-global-warming-hoax.html


The article is about the breaking of records in weather and links this to global warming.

There has and always will be a constant incidence of weather records being broken.

As we get more detailed about recording climate we will get more records broken.

Against this we have to consider how far back our records go. Not very usually.

Our present climate is with the bounds of what you you expect it to be. Very boring really.
27-11-2014 02:10
Abraham3Profile picture★★☆☆☆
(256)
Atmospheric CO2 levels have not been at their current level since before the appearance of homo sapiens as a species. They have not increased at their current rate since the dinosaurs were eliminated by the collisions of a 7-mile wide asteroid at Chicxulub, 65 million years ago. You think that's just a typical weather records falling?
Edited on 27-11-2014 02:12
27-11-2014 20:07
Tim the plumber
★★★★☆
(1361)
No. CO2 levels are changing due to us burning fossil fuel. The climate is however not changing much at all as a result.
30-11-2014 19:24
Abraham3Profile picture★★☆☆☆
(256)
Please compare the last 15 years to the last 134. Can you really claim that tick is significant?



There was a much larger 'tick' from 1941 to 1979. That didn't mark the end of warming? Why should the current hiatus? Why do you think it so special?
Edited on 30-11-2014 19:26
07-01-2015 21:46
spicez
☆☆☆☆☆
(17)
14-03-2017 20:47
litesong
★★★★★
(2297)
spicez wrote:

During this time:
The solar TSI has been languid for many decades & low for 10 years (including a 3+year low setting a 100 year record). Yet, 385+ straight months of temperatures have past, all over the 20th century average. The last 3 years have been successively the hottest years ever recorded. Presently, Arctic sea ice extent has been below 14 million square kilometers, ~ 1.8 million square kilometers LESS than the 1980's. Presently, Arctic sea ice VOLUME is 9,600 cubic kilometers LESS than that of the 1980's. This is an equivalent cube of ice, 21.2 kilometers by 21.2 kilometers by 68,000 feet high, the energy needed to melt it being 30 times the energy consumption of the U.S. All this, while the sun's HEAT.... is low.
https://www.bing.com/images/search?view=detailV2&ccid=95V9E%2bjf&id=4FC0BEEDAF541FE3EDF1A01694FDEE4CCC8A3E34&q=Arctic+Sea+Ice+Volume+Graph+feb+2017&simid=608038143506452087&selectedIndex=9&ajaxhist=0

When TSI returns to normal, Earth temperatures & conditions will really change.... & the beginning has already started. Thanks spicez, for the starting flag!!
Edited on 14-03-2017 20:50
29-03-2017 21:48
Tim the plumber
★★★★☆
(1361)
Abraham3 wrote:
Please compare the last 15 years to the last 134. Can you really claim that tick is significant?



There was a much larger 'tick' from 1941 to 1979. That didn't mark the end of warming? Why should the current hiatus? Why do you think it so special?


Why chose that time period?

Try looking at a 8,000 year period.

The present climate is within the general variability of the climate's normal range. Nothing new.
30-04-2017 03:22
LifeIsThermal
☆☆☆☆☆
(39)
Abraham3 wrote:
Please compare the last 15 years to the last 134. Can you really claim that tick is significant?



There was a much larger 'tick' from 1941 to 1979. That didn't mark the end of warming? Why should the current hiatus? Why do you think it so special?


You seem to like diagrams more than physics. Could you do me a favor? Plot a curve of absolute temperature from that same period. Not anomalies, temperature in Celsius, with full temperature scale, over same period. I think it would look nice, but I don´t have the time to do it, I have to watch porn now.

But curves seems important to you so I assume you would be suited for the task.

If not, do you think that curve would look scary?
30-04-2017 19:15
spot
★★★★☆
(1323)
With your powers of observation, did anyone look at the date the post your are replying to was posted?
19-07-2017 00:44
StarMan
★☆☆☆☆
(88)
Adword wrote:
We need to control global-warming by using no polluted source like solar energy.



fullcircleTD: I am also agree with Adword.

___________________________________________

Excellent! Both of you, and all your fellow jihadists of the climate change sharia use solar energy to travel. No gasoline. No commercial aviation. No trains, no buses. Just electricity you generated from solar radiation.

You won't get far! And by the way, warm your houses in winter only with that same lovely solar energy. And cook your food with it.
19-08-2017 10:24
GreenMan
★★★☆☆
(661)
StarMan wrote:
Adword wrote:
We need to control global-warming by using no polluted source like solar energy.



fullcircleTD: I am also agree with Adword.

___________________________________________

Excellent! Both of you, and all your fellow jihadists of the climate change sharia use solar energy to travel. No gasoline. No commercial aviation. No trains, no buses. Just electricity you generated from solar radiation.

You won't get far! And by the way, warm your houses in winter only with that same lovely solar energy. And cook your food with it.


We have to figure out a way to do all those things, because we simply cannot continue generating so much CO2 for our daily lives. Maybe not solar power, but there has to be a solution to our energy needs that doesn't add CO2 to the environment.

We could do that, if people would get a grip on reality. Those scientists aren't conspiring to destroy our society. They are telling us that what we are doing will eventually destroy our environment. That means that we cannot continue doing business as usual. Best thing to do is get on board the train that is moving in the right direction.


~*~ GreenMan ~*~

https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/leftbehind/index.php
20-08-2017 17:09
StarMan
★☆☆☆☆
(88)
GreenMan: "We could do that, if we would get a grip on reality."


You really DO need to get a grip on reality. So does Al Gore, and Barack Obama, and Richard Branson, and the Hollywood Glitterati, and *academic* preachers of doom and gloom, who fly around the world doing all their SO IMPORTANT BUSINESS that they think themselves exempt from their own preaching.

Meanwhile to help you get a grip on reality, watch Secretary of State John Kerry lecture to the Paris Climate Accord hypocrites:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMpd9Z8Uugg

Then listen to Nobel Laureate Ivar Giaever:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCy_UOjEir0&t=440s

Then tell all your fellow *environmentalists* to stop flying and driving to earth days, climate protests, Hate Trump Beat Ups and Riots, Solar Eclipses, vacations, and family get togethers. Impossible to do anything like those if you intend to practice the 80% CO2 preached by your sanctimonious liars.


Ignore List: Surface Detail, litesong, spot, Into The Night
21-08-2017 10:04
GreenMan
★★★☆☆
(661)
StarMan wrote:
GreenMan: "We could do that, if we would get a grip on reality."


You really DO need to get a grip on reality. So does Al Gore, and Barack Obama, and Richard Branson, and the Hollywood Glitterati, and *academic* preachers of doom and gloom, who fly around the world doing all their SO IMPORTANT BUSINESS that they think themselves exempt from their own preaching.

Meanwhile to help you get a grip on reality, watch Secretary of State John Kerry lecture to the Paris Climate Accord hypocrites:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMpd9Z8Uugg

Then listen to Nobel Laureate Ivar Giaever:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCy_UOjEir0&t=440s

Then tell all your fellow *environmentalists* to stop flying and driving to earth days, climate protests, Hate Trump Beat Ups and Riots, Solar Eclipses, vacations, and family get togethers. Impossible to do anything like those if you intend to practice the 80% CO2 preached by your sanctimonious liars.


You are right, in a way, Starman. Seems like everybody, including those who are blowing the Climate Change horn the loudest, expect someone else to fix the problem. I still drive a car too, because there is no alternative at this time. But if there was some way to get around, I would use it, if it meant that doing so made my CO2 footprint smaller.

What we need is massive government regulation, that will provide solutions to the problem, and massive taxation if that is what it takes to wean us off of fossil fuels. If we don't do it now by choice, we will eventually have to do it anyway. So the best thing to do is get it in our heads that things are going to change.


~*~ GreenMan ~*~

https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/leftbehind/index.php
22-08-2017 00:36
StarMan
★☆☆☆☆
(88)
In Southern California, I can drive at 65 MPH, the speed limit, and Prius' pass me on right and left, doing 80 MPH.

Now if they are so sanctimonious and so *concerned* about CO2, why don't they drive 55 MPH instead of 80?

Moreover, you seem to have missed the clip of John Kerry saying that there is NOTHING you can do! NOTHING.

Still you insist on trying to *save the planet*.

You have been brainwashed by the socialists.


Ignore List: Surface Detail, litesong, spot, Into The Night




Join the debate Incredible News! Climate Change Really *was* Just a Hoax *all along*!:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
AIDS was hoax402-11-2024 04:45
Nukes are hoax1531-10-2024 11:25
BREAKNG NEWS...With great sadness I am announcing the death of climate debate.com2113-08-2024 22:13
fox news806-07-2024 20:32
Heliocentric model is hoax, fraud3004-06-2024 15:35
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact