If Americans didn't bother with CO2 during the wars against Nazi Germany and Soviet Union, why
| If Americans didn't bother with CO2 during the wars against Nazi Germany and Soviet Union, why26-04-2019 15:35 | |
| Tai Hai Chen★★★★☆ (1085) |
would Americans bother with CO2 now they are in the biggest fight of their lives with China for global domination? China is by far their biggest opponent ever faced and far more powerful than Nazi Germany and Soviet Union back in the day. |
| 26-04-2019 17:12 | |
| James___★★★★★ (5513) |
Tai Hai Chen wrote: The Soviet Union was an ally when fighting Nazi Germany. At the same time the US was fighting Japan because of Japan occupying a part of mainland China. America has helped to make China the country it is today. The US has claimed that China represents opportunity for American businesses when in reality that opportunity has never existed except for cheap labour. The US benefits because of cheap labour from countries like Mexico and India which are Democracies. So why does the US support communism? |
| 26-04-2019 19:38 | |
Into the Night ★★★★★(21599) |
Tai Hai Chen wrote: Apparently they would. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
| 26-04-2019 19:47 | |
| dehammer★★★☆☆ (480) |
MMCC is a socialist plot so fighting AGAINST claims that co2 is causing the warming IS fighting against china. |
| 26-04-2019 20:19 | |
| Into the Night★★★★★ (21599) |
dehammer wrote: Ooo. More paranoia. No, the Church of Global Warming is not a Chinese plot. It does stem from the Church of Karl Marx though. It was created by Marxists in the United Nations that want to implement Marxism, especially in the United States. People here are rejecting it. The Church of Global Warming, being a fundamentalist religion, does not yet see this (and probably never will). The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan Edited on 26-04-2019 20:19 |
| 26-04-2019 20:35 | |
| dehammer★★★☆☆ (480) |
What ever you say comrade troll. |
Join the debate If Americans didn't bother with CO2 during the wars against Nazi Germany and Soviet Union, why:
Related content
| Threads | Replies | Last post |
| How can climate policy prevent wars.? | 109 | 29-02-2024 21:25 |
| Fossil Fuel Substitution for reduced emission of CO2, mercury, lead, arsenic, cadmium.. | 392 | 01-12-2023 21:58 |
| Proof That Too Much CO2 Is An Existential Threat | 326 | 07-11-2023 19:16 |
| LOL, the FBI is still looking for Jimmy Hoffa, as 100,000 Americans die of Fentanyl every year | 0 | 31-07-2023 19:16 |
| There is no scientific theory or evidence that suggest CO2 traps heat better than O2 or N2 | 533 | 30-01-2023 07:22 |