01-09-2019 01:24 | |
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14862) |
tmiddles wrote: I can see IBdaMann now, learning some science on the streets from some guy, and then shuffling off to his backyard lab to confirm that Stefan-Boltzmann Law, You cannot refrain from misstating my position and then attacking me on the basis of your misstatements. I took the time to explain to you the opposite. Is it really worth it to be completely dishonest? How is it working out for you? . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist |
01-09-2019 01:33 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
IBdaMann wrote:tmiddles wrote: I can see IBdaMann now, learning some science on the streets from some guy, and then shuffling off to his backyard lab to confirm that Stefan-Boltzmann Law, I quoted you: IBdaMann wrote:tmiddles wrote:So help me out here. How did you learn the Stefan-Boltzmann Law and why do you trust that it's not made up garbage?Someone explained the science to me, as I have to you, and then I was able to go into a lab and apply the scientific method. I could not show it to be false so I can't call it garbage. So yeah, that's you saying that. |
01-09-2019 01:36 | |
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14862) |
tmiddles wrote:IBdaMann wrote:tmiddles wrote: I can see IBdaMann now, learning some science on the streets from some guy, and then shuffling off to his backyard lab to confirm that Stefan-Boltzmann Law, Where do I claim to confirm anything? . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist |
01-09-2019 01:39 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
IBdaMann wrote: I didn't quote you as saying that did I Mr. Sensitive. That was my wording. Neither you nor ITN have ever confirmed ANYTHING on this board other than platitudes you don't back up. I'm well aware your story was fictional even as you told it. Edited on 01-09-2019 01:40 |
01-09-2019 02:33 | |
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14862) |
tmiddles wrote: I can see IBdaMann now, learning some science on the streets from some guy, and then shuffling off to his backyard lab to confirm that Stefan-Boltzmann Law, IBdaMann wrote: tmiddles wrote: I didn't quote you as saying that did I Mr. Sensitive. That was my wording. Yes, in your wording you misstated my position. When have I ever expressed, stated or implied that science confirms theories? . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist |
01-09-2019 12:24 | |
spot★★★★☆ (1323) |
Into the Night wrote:spot wrote: Pointless to answer you as you know you can buy or borrow a book on the subject or use one of the many excellent learning resources online. You can't spell magic, you never went to school. I don't think what you have to say is useful. IBdaMann wrote: "Air" is not a body in and of itself. Ergo it is not a blackbody. Planck's law describes the spectral density of electromagnetic radiation emitted by a black body in thermal equilibrium at a given temperature T. |
01-09-2019 13:08 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
spot wrote: I think it's fair to say ITN doesn't believe any textbooks on thermodynamics are accurate. Not a single one! So picking one up wouldn't help. |
01-09-2019 19:23 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (22536) |
tmiddles wrote:spot wrote: I suggest you study up on the laws of thermodynamics, where these theories came from, and the equations they became. If you want to falsify any one of them. YOU are going to have to do that, else the theory stands. tmiddles wrote: Not our opinion. We didn't write the Stefan-Boltzmann law or the 2nd law of thermodynamics. tmiddles wrote:IBdaMann wrote:tmiddles wrote:So help me out here. How did you learn the Stefan-Boltzmann Law and why do you trust that it's not made up garbage?Someone explained the science to me, as I have to you, and then I was able to go into a lab and apply the scientific method. I could not show it to be false so I can't call it garbage. . It is YOU attempting to deny the Stefan-Boltzmann law, dumbass. He is asking YOU to explain how you are falsifying it. It is YOU that is attempting to falsify the 2nd law of thermodynamics. He is asking YOU to explain how you are falsifying it. So far you have failed to do either. tmiddles wrote: None needed. It is YOU attempting to falsify these laws. It is YOU that has to come up with the falsification. tmiddles wrote: Yes, I dismiss. it. The textbook you used is biased. tmiddles wrote:Into the Night wrote:This book is in error....tmiddles wrote: With nothing to back anything up but platitudes.[/quote] Lie. We already showed you multiple times. tmiddles wrote: None needed. It is YOU that is trying to falsify the 2nd law of thermodynamics. So far you have failed to do so. All you've done is massage random numbers through equations and call that a falsification. You are lying. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
01-09-2019 19:25 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (22536) |
tmiddles wrote:IBdaMann wrote: So you lied. tmiddles wrote: Burden of proof fallacy. It is YOU that has to falsify the law. We have to do nothing. tmiddles wrote: Then you openly deny the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
01-09-2019 19:28 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (22536) |
spot wrote:Into the Night wrote:spot wrote: So, you can't justify the 'greenhouse effect', eh? spot wrote: Magic is different from magick. Magic is a show for entertainment. They tell you they are lying to you. Magick is 'mysterious forces' that do some 'mysterious thing'. They lie, telling you it's the truth. spot wrote: Running for cover already? Coward. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
01-09-2019 19:32 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (22536) |
tmiddles wrote:spot wrote: False authority fallacy. A textbook is not an authoritative reference of any theory of science. Only the authors of that theory are the authoritative reference. You go look up this history of these theories and how they came about. The equations haven't changed. The equations are what they are. They are completely accurate. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
02-09-2019 00:59 | |
spot★★★★☆ (1323) |
Into the Night wrote:spot wrote:Into the Night wrote:spot wrote: I can't see the need to justify anything to you, the greenhouse effect is real the fact we exist and haven't frozen to death is proof. Magick is a word made up by sex obsessed drug addict, It's meaningless in this context. And stopping correspondence with you is not cowardly but rather a way of ending a pointless interaction. IBdaMann wrote: "Air" is not a body in and of itself. Ergo it is not a blackbody. Planck's law describes the spectral density of electromagnetic radiation emitted by a black body in thermal equilibrium at a given temperature T. |
02-09-2019 04:18 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
Into the Night wrote:tmiddles wrote:I suggest you study up on the laws of thermodynamics,....The textbook you used is biased. HA HA HA HA HA! How does one "study up" without books? Oh wait. You mean like IBD? He learned without a book (link): IBdaMann wrote:tmiddles wrote:So help me out here. How did you learn the Stefan-Boltzmann Law and why do you trust that it's not made up garbage?Someone explained the science to me, as I have to you, and then I was able to go into a lab and apply the scientific method. I could not show it to be false so I can't call it garbage. You know what a sane response to this would be ITN? "Here's a book that is legit: ______________" Only your crazy ideas are so out of the park nuts there are ZERO references to corroborate them. Into the Night wrote:you want to falsify any one of them I did prove your and IBD's coo coo concept that radiance from cooler bodies isn't absorbed by warmer bodies is false here: net-thermal-radiation Into the Night wrote:tmiddles wrote:Lie. We already showed you multiple times. AH! The classic from ITN, King of indiscriminate quoting, that something was supposedly posted but he just lacks the motivation to quote it. You never even tried to answer University Physics Volume 2 1.6 Mechanisms of Heat Transfer EXAMPLE 1.13 Into the Night wrote:This pretty much sums you guys up.tmiddles wrote:...We have to do nothing. Into the Night wrote:False authority fallacy. Only the authors of that theory are the authoritative reference. You go look up this history of these theories...You look them up you total joke! You have nothing or you'd post it. Show a single reference where it even hints that a hotter body cannot absorb radiance from a cooler one. |
02-09-2019 17:01 | |
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14862) |
tmiddles wrote: Oh wait. You mean like IBD? He learned without a book (link):tmiddles wrote:IBdaMann wrote:Someone explained the science to me, as I have to you, and then I was able to go into a lab and apply the scientific method. I could not show it to be false so I can't call it garbage. When did I write that I had no book? I notice that you have taken to ridiculing my lack of a book ... but I don't understand where you got that idea. . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist |
02-09-2019 19:46 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (22536) |
spot wrote:Into the Night wrote:spot wrote:Into the Night wrote:spot wrote: Coward. You can't justify anything with me and you know it. spot wrote: Explain how. Define 'real' while you're at it. spot wrote: Not a proof. Leaping to conclusion fallacy. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism). spot wrote: Bulverism fallacy. spot wrote: No, it's being a coward. You can't even explain what 'greenhouse effect' is, so you run from it. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
02-09-2019 19:57 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (22536) |
tmiddles wrote:Into the Night wrote:tmiddles wrote:I suggest you study up on the laws of thermodynamics,....The textbook you used is biased. Easy. Use unbiased resources. Use the theories themselves and how they were formed and how they were tested. tmiddles wrote: No, you muckied around with random numbers, produced a random result, call that 'data' and a 'proof'. tmiddles wrote:Into the Night wrote:tmiddles wrote:Lie. We already showed you multiple times. Lie. It was addressed. tmiddles wrote:Into the Night wrote:This pretty much sums you guys up.tmiddles wrote:...We have to do nothing. Burden of proof fallacy. We have to do nothing. We accept the 2nd law of thermodynamics. YOU have to falsify it. Mucking up random numbers and calling them 'data' is not a proof. Misquoting textbooks is not a proof either. Using biased textbooks is not a proof either. tmiddles wrote:Into the Night wrote:False authority fallacy. Only the authors of that theory are the authoritative reference. You go look up this history of these theories...You look them up you total joke! I already know them. YOU have to do this. You can't lay that job on anyone else but YOU. tmiddles wrote: I did post it, dumbass. tmiddles wrote: 2nd law of thermodynamics. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
02-09-2019 23:05 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
IBdaMann wrote:IBdaMann wrote:When did I write that I had no book?tmiddles wrote:So help me out here. How did you learn the Stefan-Boltzmann LawSomeone explained the science to me Oh? Which ones? You answered the question. I just asked it (many times). |
02-09-2019 23:18 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
Into the Night wrote:tmiddles wrote: OMG And why do you consider all the physics textbooks biased? Into the Night wrote:tmiddles wrote: Ah! Again the pretense that it's too much trouble to quote. You never even tried. Into the Night wrote: Your crazy take on the 2nd LTD contradicts reality and every text book ever written on radiative heat. And you pretend you don't have time to answer as you sabotage the board with destructively long empty posts. |
03-09-2019 04:29 | |
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14862) |
tmiddles wrote:And why do you consider all the physics textbooks biased? The same reason you are convinced Climate Change isn't real. tmiddles wrote:Ah! Again the pretense that it's too much trouble to quote. You never even tried. Ah! Again the pretense that we are trained seals who live for your amusement, that others are somehow obligated to endlessly repost while you ignore. I find it much more amusing to know that you condemn yourself to a debilitating delusion that you are terrified to abandon. I, for one, am thrilled that you believe the 2nd law of thermodynamics only holds when convenient for you. People such as yourself make my children relatively more competitive. Thank you for that. tmiddles wrote: Your crazy take on the 2nd LTD contradicts reality and every text book ever written on radiative heat. I am happy to leave it at that, especially the part where you delude yourself into believing you know the content of every "text book" ever written on radiative heat. One can only imagine what other unknown material you delude yourself into thinking is "what we know." Good luck in life. tmiddles wrote:And you pretend you don't have time to answer as you sabotage the board with destructively long empty posts. No one needs to justify not having time for you. . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist |
03-09-2019 11:37 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
IBdaMann wrote: Ah it's like your old standard. The pretend previous post that never existed, the focus ont the motives and psychology of those who defeat you in a debate. Still waiting on any reference at all you find reliable. But you've never had one in nearly 5 years so I doubt it'll ever happen. |
03-09-2019 19:40 | |
spot★★★★☆ (1323) |
Into the Night wrote:spot wrote:Into the Night wrote:spot wrote:Into the Night wrote:spot wrote: I accept that I can't convince you to abandon your delusion and desire to have the same stupid discussion over and over again. IBdaMann wrote: "Air" is not a body in and of itself. Ergo it is not a blackbody. Planck's law describes the spectral density of electromagnetic radiation emitted by a black body in thermal equilibrium at a given temperature T. |
03-09-2019 21:12 | |
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14862) |
spot wrote:I accept that I can't convince you to abandon your delusion and desire to have the same stupid discussion over and over again. It's more like people can open the gate for you but no one can force you out from cowering in the corner to actually get out of the starting gate. You can't compete in a forum of ideas if you simply won't compete. That's no one else's delusion. That's your nightmare. So you haven't been able to identify any specific innacuracies in The MANUAL, right? . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist |
03-09-2019 21:18 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (22536) |
tmiddles wrote:Into the Night wrote:tmiddles wrote: Nah. You just want to deny the 2nd law of thermodynamics. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
03-09-2019 21:19 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (22536) |
tmiddles wrote:IBdaMann wrote: The 2nd law of thermodynamics. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
03-09-2019 21:20 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (22536) |
spot wrote:Into the Night wrote:spot wrote:Into the Night wrote:spot wrote:Into the Night wrote:spot wrote: No, you just won't choose which argument you want to make for 'greenhouse effect'. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
03-09-2019 21:20 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (22536) |
IBdaMann wrote:spot wrote:I accept that I can't convince you to abandon your delusion and desire to have the same stupid discussion over and over again. Apparently he is not. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
03-09-2019 21:41 | |
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14862) |
tmiddles wrote:The pretend previous post that never existed, the focus ont the motives and psychology of those who defeat you in a debate. That's right. How could I forget. You were declared the winner by the judge. You are Subduction Zone all over again. tmiddles wrote: Still waiting on any reference at all you find reliable. Are you in a rush? What a coincidence, I happen to be waiting for a repeatable example of thermal energy flowing from a cooler body to a warmer body in violation of the second law of thermodynamics. No, I'm not in any rush. Get to it when you can. tmiddles wrote: But you've never had one in nearly 5 years so I doubt it'll ever happen. I'm reading one right now, however it's not what you would call "scintillating." . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist |
04-09-2019 05:33 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
Into the Night wrote: Into the Night wrote: Prove me wrong. All you need is one "test" where net radiative heat is disproven. IBdaMann wrote:I happen to be waiting for a repeatable example But you've never said what that is. You can't give a single reference that would qualify. Just one. In any area at all. Doesn't even have to be thermodynamics. Just one little reference of how it ought to be done. |
04-09-2019 07:54 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (22536) |
tmiddles wrote:Into the Night wrote: The 2nd law of thermodynamics and the requirements of external consistency. tmiddles wrote:IBdaMann wrote:I happen to be waiting for a repeatable example He doesn't have to. YOU have to. He is claiming nothing. YOU are claiming to have falsified the 2nd law of thermodynamics. The burden of proof is on YOU. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
04-09-2019 09:42 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
Into the Night wrote:tmiddles wrote:IBdaMann wrote:I happen to be waiting for a repeatable example He's asking for it. What is he asking for? |
04-09-2019 16:19 | |
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14862) |
tmiddles wrote:Into the Night wrote:tmiddles wrote:IBdaMann wrote:I happen to be waiting for a repeatable example I'm not asking for anything. I am waiting, but I don't care if it ever comes. ... and you well know what it is. . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist |
04-09-2019 16:22 | |
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14862) |
tmiddles wrote:Prove me wrong. All you need is one "test" where net radiative heat is disproven. The trivial example: you have misapplied the principle you discuss. . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist |
05-09-2019 02:33 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
IBdaMann wrote:you well know what it is. You have played the same game for five years on this board. EVERYTHING you don't like is disqualified for some insufficiency and NOTHING has ever been qualified. It's a stupid game. |
05-09-2019 02:46 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (22536) |
tmiddles wrote:IBdaMann wrote:you well know what it is. It is YOU making the insufficiency. You have only yourself to blame. You have not been on this forum for five years, though other members of the Church of Global Warming have. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
07-09-2019 12:11 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
Into the Night wrote: And what pray tell is insufficient in your ability to explain how a human maintains body temperature? to tell us all a textbook on thermodynamics that is reliable? to share an example of research and experimentation done properly? to give an example of data that is reliable? I took a basic problem from a textbook and asked what your answer would be: How does a human body maintain body temperature in a normal 70F room Neither you or IBD could answer that. Too many unknowns! It can not be known! it's impossible!!! Because you are lame. |
07-09-2019 14:45 | |
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14862) |
tmiddles wrote:And what pray tell is insufficient in your ability to explain how a human maintains body temperature? And what pray tell is insufficient in your ability to provide a repeatable instance of thermal radiation flowing from a cooler body to a body of higher temperature? Because you are lame. . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist |
07-09-2019 19:57 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (22536) |
tmiddles wrote:Into the Night wrote: Repetitious questions that have already been answered. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
07-09-2019 22:34 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
Into the Night wrote:questions that have already been answered.You never even tried liar. IBdaMann wrote:Right here How IBD is maintain body temperature right now |
07-09-2019 22:46 | |
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14862) |
tmiddles wrote:IBdaMann wrote:Right here How IBD is maintain body temperature right now Not repeatable. Try again. . I don't think i can [define it]. I just kind of get a feel for the phrase. - keepit A Spaghetti strainer with the faucet running, retains water- tmiddles Clouds don't trap heat. Clouds block cold. - Spongy Iris Printing dollars to pay debt doesn't increase the number of dollars. - keepit If Venus were a black body it would have a much much lower temperature than what we found there.- tmiddles Ah the "Valid Data" myth of ITN/IBD. - tmiddles Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist. The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank :*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist |
07-09-2019 22:48 | |
tmiddles★★★★★ (3979) |
IBdaMann wrote:tmiddles wrote:How IBD is maintain body temperature right now You repeat it every day. You are repeating it now. |
Threads | Replies | Last post |
The SCIENCE of the "Greenhouse Effect" | 305 | 12-11-2024 19:29 |
Nitrate Reduction - Powerful Greenhouse Gas Emission AND Alkalinity | 106 | 21-10-2024 00:54 |
Greenhouse gasses | 83 | 18-07-2024 21:32 |
1st law, 2nd law, stefan boltzman, plank | 20 | 10-07-2024 01:16 |
The "radiative Greenhouse effect" does not exist | 145 | 24-04-2024 02:48 |