Remember me
▼ Content

Experimental results proves CO2 does not increase temperature, so why still debate?


Experimental results proves CO2 does not increase temperature, so why still debate?21-01-2016 03:26
Tai Hai Chen
★★★★☆
(1079)
CO2 increased from 275 ppm to 403 ppm with no change in temperature. 125,000 years ago it was 3 to 4 C warmer than today's world when CO2 was 280 ppm. Experimentally, we can conclude CO2 is a plant food having no effect on temperature.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eemian

There is an argument that there is a hundreds of years of lag between change in CO2 and temperature change, but I don't think this is correct. If you think about it, we have summer and winter within the same year due to changes in sunlight intensity. It doesn't take hundreds of years for temperature to respond to changes in sunlight intensity. Not to mention, CO2 only increases by like 2 ppm per year, a tiny effect on temperature, so no reason Earth does not adjust to a new equilibrium every year in response.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2sKX20WhKS4
Edited on 21-01-2016 03:28
22-01-2016 02:29
Tai Hai Chen
★★★★☆
(1079)
I could give a d about theory. Science is about the scientific method, experimentation. If experimentation shows there is greenhouse effect, then there is. If experimentation does not show there is greenhouse effect, then there isn't. Simple as that.
17-05-2017 23:12
Wake
★★★★★
(4031)
Tai Hai Chen wrote:
I could give a d about theory. Science is about the scientific method, experimentation. If experimentation shows there is greenhouse effect, then there is. If experimentation does not show there is greenhouse effect, then there isn't. Simple as that.


But you can see in virtually every mainstream media article that includes the slightest mention of the weather: "because of climate change".

Most of this is driven by an extreme left wing media who for eight years was driven by an extreme left wing government.

From the statement of the chairman of the IPCC: "this isn't about climate change, this is about reapportioning the world's resources." This is plainly a one world government grab.

Always remember, any government powerful enough to give you all you need is powerful enough to take all you have. And history shows that to have ALWAYS been the case.

The most recent example if Venezuela which the media is studiously ignoring since the masses want to get rid of communism.
18-05-2017 18:09
James_
★★★☆☆
(801)
Tai Hai Chen wrote:
I could give a d about theory. Science is about the scientific method, experimentation. If experimentation shows there is greenhouse effect, then there is. If experimentation does not show there is greenhouse effect, then there isn't. Simple as that.


Tai,
There was a time when a person would create a hypothesis and then test it. I'm not sure why climate scientists rely on computer models without having physical experiments to verify the basis of such modeling.

Jim
18-05-2017 18:50
Wake
★★★★★
(4031)
James_ wrote:
Tai Hai Chen wrote:
I could give a d about theory. Science is about the scientific method, experimentation. If experimentation shows there is greenhouse effect, then there is. If experimentation does not show there is greenhouse effect, then there isn't. Simple as that.


Tai,
There was a time when a person would create a hypothesis and then test it. I'm not sure why climate scientists rely on computer models without having physical experiments to verify the basis of such modeling.

Jim


Too many things cannot be tested. So you form a model and then make sure that it demonstrates the conditions that are now. You then play with the conditions to see the results.

Unfortunately this really doesn't work very often. While doing a classified project for the military I damaged my lungs due to dumbass models and stupid physicists that do not understand the slightest normal safety procedures.

A doctor I have now tells me that my lungs appear to work fine now. He says that unless under continuous stress they can heal a great deal.




Join the debate Experimental results proves CO2 does not increase temperature, so why still debate?:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Why can't you say Venus is hotter than Mercury because Venus got CO2?806-12-2019 01:07
There is no scientific theory or evidence that suggest CO2 traps heat better than O2 or N220705-12-2019 17:00
Poulation controll revisited - CO2 compensation through population control814-11-2019 23:28
Is it not true that brains shrink due to increase in CO2 displacing O2?208-11-2019 18:45
Next year will the first year since lord knows when CO2 is more than 400 ppm all year at Moana Loa305-11-2019 18:15
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2019 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact