Graphic: The relentless rise of carbon dioxide

Tai Hai Chen wrote:
https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/graphic-the-relentless-rise-of-carbon-dioxide/

Into the Night wrote:

Tai Hai Chen wrote:
https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/graphic-the-relentless-rise-of-carbon-dioxide/

Manufactured 'data'. It is not possible to measure the global CO2 concentration. CO2 is not evenly distributed in the atmosphere, and we don't have enough stations.

Further, the Maua Loa station has been shown to be cooking their data. It's useless. You can't use cooked data in statistical math.

HarveyH55 wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Tai Hai Chen wrote:
https://climate.nasa.gov/climate_resources/24/graphic-the-relentless-rise-of-carbon-dioxide/

Manufactured 'data'. It is not possible to measure the global CO2 concentration. CO2 is not evenly distributed in the atmosphere, and we don't have enough stations.

Further, the Maua Loa station has been shown to be cooking their data. It's useless. You can't use cooked data in statistical math.

Mauna Loa is kind of close to a lot of volcanic activity. They have several active volcanoes, and gasses are vented all over the place. Basically, the CO2 levels they read, would be as accurate as the activity, and wind direction. 0.04% is such a tiny concentration, scattered over a huge planet. Still amazes me that people believe it's of any significance, let alone, the primary driver.

HarveyH55 wrote:
They don't have to erupt, being active, means they are venting gas. Those gasses escape through the most convenient crack or crevice, not constrained to lava flows.

There is no actual way to observe CO2, pretty sure, even if they had a device, that could only see CO2, there still wouldn't be a high enough concentration to see much of anything, other than just around the source, briefly.