Global warming is not anthropogenic
| 16-03-2022 07:20 | |
Into the Night ★★★★★(19346) |
tmiddles wrote:sealover wrote:I'm curious how would you describe your stance? How do you know the globe is warming? From when to when? It's not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
| 16-03-2022 07:26 | |
| Into the Night★★★★★ (19346) |
sealover wrote:tmiddles wrote:sealover wrote:I'm curious how would you describe your stance? Like being paranoid, eh? sealover wrote: What 'window'? sealover wrote: We know the Doom and Gloom predicted by the Church of Global Warming already. You aren't hiding anything. sealover wrote: Buzzword fallacy. sealover wrote: Where? The SDTC? They have wildfires because they don't maintain their grasslands and forests, and because wet spring weather grows a lot of grass that burns later when it dries out in the summer. sealover wrote: Where? What's wrong with methane? It's a fuel. sealover wrote: No gas or vapor is capable of warming the Earth. You can't create energy out of nothing. See the 1st law of thermodynamics, which you are ignoring again. sealover wrote: Define 'climate change'. sealover wrote: No, it isn't. What's wrong with CO2? It can't increase the temperature of the Earth either. No gas or vapor has that capability. sealover wrote: Define 'the wrong direction'. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
| 16-03-2022 07:38 | |
tmiddles ★★★★★(3975) |
sealover wrote:...I'll pick up on the many worst-case scenario changes that arrived sooner than even worst-case scenarios predicted... I think clarity it tough with this stuff in general. Like my first post here was pure skepticism about that: https://www.climate-debate.com/forum/tangier-island-should-it-be-used-as-an-example-d11-e2689.php Where it was presented that an island was sinking due to AGW (a decidedly post 1900 issue it's fair to say). Yet in the middle of the report they mentioned the other half of the island had already sunk in the late 1800s. Because no human climate changes are mixed with our own influence. This would be especially hard to sound alarm bells about if by dumb luck we happened to be heading into an ice age and everything was being offset temporarily. "Good tests kill flawed theories; we remain alive to guess again." - Karl Popper ITN/IBD Fraud exposed: The 2nd LTD add on claiming radiance from cooler bodies can't be absorbed Max Planck debunks, they can't explain:net-thermal-radiation-you-in-a-room-as-a-reference & Proof: no data is valid for IBD or ITN[/quote] Edited on 16-03-2022 07:39 |
Join the debate Global warming is not anthropogenic:
Related content
| Threads | Replies | Last post |
| Liberals have mental disease caused by anthropogenic chemicals | 1 | 03-02-2017 20:30 |