Remember me
▼ Content

fracking


fracking10-02-2022 17:37
keepit
★★★★★
(2560)
Anybody here have any thoughts on fracking and the nord2.
10-02-2022 17:58
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(11965)
keepit wrote:Anybody here have any thoughts on fracking and the nord2.

Have you reviewed the material in previous posts? (Answer: No)

A great deal has already been written and you are asking, well, everyone to repeat what has already been written ... many times.

Why don't you review past threads, pick a particular aspect of fracking that has not been thoroughly discussed and create a thread with that firmly in the thread's name?

Perhaps you could start a thread on how you want to limit fracking because of water issues while fully supporting unlimited fracking in all its glory.
10-02-2022 18:05
keepit
★★★★★
(2560)
i don't want to limit fracking ibd. Do you think i'm a bleeding liberal? Oops, i forgot, noone here has a sense of humor.
10-02-2022 18:12
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(11965)
keepit wrote: i don't want to limit fracking ibd.

Then announce that. You had previously wanted to limit fracking because you believed that water could not be reused and other tripe that you regurgitated from others.

keepit wrote: Do you think i'm a bleeding liberal?

No, I think you are a Marxist hater who would prefer a heaping dose of tyranny.

keepit wrote: Oops, i forgot, noone here has a sense of humor.

Ooops, you forgot that you don't know how to be funny.
10-02-2022 18:21
GasGuzzler
★★★★★
(2481)
keepit wrote:
Do you think i'm a bleeding liberal?


You ARE a bleeding heart blissfully ignorant liberal. ANY support of censorship is all I need to know.

Conservatism is not a party. It is a mindset of freedom accompanied by a Constitution and a Bill of Rights. Government's role is to protect freedom and said rights.

Governments role does NOT include picking winners and losers by way of hand outs, or deciding who talks and who is silenced.

Liberals have a much different mindset. You are one of them.


Studies show that if you force several tubs of peanut butter down the throats of newborns, in some cases it could potentially be toxic. In cities where infant-PB-stuffing is more common, infant deaths increased by over 47% with corresponding increases in dead-infant obesity.. -IBdaMann
Edited on 10-02-2022 18:23
10-02-2022 20:20
keepit
★★★★★
(2560)
i don't care if you -----------s think i'm a liberal. I'm not.
And who in their right mind would want tyranny. i don't. Think before you open your loud mouth.
My discussions of fracking dealt with ways to mitigate the side effects. Nothing to do with limiting fracking. My posts are there to read regarding my thoughts on fracking. You know, you can do a little research if you want before opening your childish mouth.
10-02-2022 21:10
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(11965)
keepit wrote:My discussions of fracking dealt with ways to mitigate the side effects

What side effects do you think fracking has?

keepit wrote: Nothing to do with limiting fracking.

You just want to make it far more expensive?
10-02-2022 21:15
keepit
★★★★★
(2560)
It pollutes a lot of water.
I'm definitely not an expert but it seems to me that all that waste water could be placed in pools and allowed to evaporate leaving behind the pollutants. Then it would be part of the water cycle and could be reused. I'm not an expert though.
10-02-2022 21:42
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(11965)
keepit wrote:It pollutes a lot of water.

It's not pollution if the water is set aside for that purpose.

You are saying that it consumes a lot of water.

Your evaporation solution is certainly possible, but you would need to address the disposal of the remaining waste.
10-02-2022 22:56
keepit
★★★★★
(2560)
All forms of fuel we use leaves behind a lot of pollutants. I know coal leaves the most. The tradeoffs might be best with nat gas.
11-02-2022 04:17
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(11965)
keepit wrote:All forms of fuel we use leaves behind a lot of pollutants.

I don't know how to take this.

Are you trying to include CO2 in your list of "pollutants"?

keepit wrote:I know coal leaves the most.

What pollutant does coal leave?

My problem is your use of the word "pollutant". Do you simply mean "waste"?
11-02-2022 23:18
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(18679)
keepit wrote:
i don't care if you -----------s think i'm a liberal. I'm not.

I don't care if you want to lie about being a liberal or not. You are.
keepit wrote:
And who in their right mind would want tyranny.

You.
keepit wrote:
i don't.

Yes you do. BTW, 'I' is a proper noun. It is capitalized.
keepit wrote:
Think before you open your loud mouth.

Think before you open your loud mouth.
keepit wrote:
My discussions of fracking dealt with ways to mitigate the side effects.

What 'side effects' are you referring to?
keepit wrote:
Nothing to do with limiting fracking.

Denying your own posts isn't going to work.
keepit wrote:
My posts are there to read regarding my thoughts on fracking.

Yes they are. You want to limit fracking.

You deny your own posts, then point to your own posts to deny your own posts.

keepit wrote:
You know, you can do a little research if you want before opening your childish mouth.

Insulting people is not helping you.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
11-02-2022 23:21
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(18679)
keepit wrote:
It pollutes a lot of water.

Nope. Water is not a pollution. Water with sand in it is not pollution.
keepit wrote:
I'm definitely not an expert but it seems to me that all that waste water could be placed in pools and allowed to evaporate leaving behind the pollutants.

A waste. Filter the water a bit and send it back down the hole.
keepit wrote:
Then it would be part of the water cycle and could be reused.

It is already part of the water cycle.
keepit wrote:
I'm not an expert though.

Obviously.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
11-02-2022 23:22
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(18679)
keepit wrote:
All forms of fuel we use leaves behind a lot of pollutants.

Define 'pollutant'.
keepit wrote:
I know coal leaves the most.

Define 'pollutant'.
keepit wrote:
The tradeoffs might be best with nat gas.

Define 'pollutant'.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
11-02-2022 23:25
keepit
★★★★★
(2560)
itn,
Look it up on google. They define it better than me.
11-02-2022 23:52
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(11965)
keepit wrote:itn, Look it up on google. They define it better than me.

I asked you to define it as well. If you do not, the only option is to dismiss everything you have written on this topic.

Odds are that you have come to the realization that there is no unambiguous definition because you aren't sure what you are talking about.
11-02-2022 23:55
keepit
★★★★★
(2560)
go ahead and dismiss what you want. I'm pretty sure i know what i'm talking about.
12-02-2022 00:03
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(11965)
keepit wrote:go ahead and dismiss what you want. I'm pretty sure i know what i'm talking about.

I don't think anyone is mistaken about your certainty that you are an absolute expert.



Dismissed!
12-02-2022 02:02
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(18679)
keepit wrote:
itn,
Look it up on google. They define it better than me.

Google doesn't define any word. Try again.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
12-02-2022 02:03
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(18679)
keepit wrote:
go ahead and dismiss what you want. I'm pretty sure i know what i'm talking about.

You are not talking about anything. An undefined word used as a subject is a fallacy dude. It's called the void argument fallacy.

Define 'pollutant'.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan




Join the debate fracking:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Bernie To Use Executive Fiat To Declare Climate Emergency, Ban Fracking, More501-02-2020 01:04
Oklahoma Earthquakes And The Rise In Fracking1021-12-2017 20:30
Study Reveals Dangerous Levels of Radioactivity Near Fracking Waste Sites - 7 mins3420-12-2017 19:19
Shale cowboys: fracking under Trump - (VPRO documentary - 2017)418-12-2017 23:56
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact