Deep Climate Change Lesson in Prisoner Puzzle

StarMan wrote:
"Light" is a SPECIFIC set of electromagnetic frequencies from IR to UV."

That it is, Wade. Absolutely no question.

Wake wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Wake wrote:

Into the Night wrote: Like the surface, any thermal energy in the air is radiated to space as infrared light at various frequencies.

Let me repeat - do you now agree that the universe is electromagnetic in nature

No. Why do you keep asking this?

Wake wrote:
or are you still denying the existence of Planck, Bohr, Heisenberg, de Broglie, Compton, Einstein, Schrodinger, Horn, Fermi, Pauli, and the rest of the world's beat and brightest that attended the 1927 Solvay Conference?

None of these guys say it is either.

Wake wrote:
ANYTHING that radiates at any frequency is electromagnetic in nature.

WRONG.
Sounds radiates at various frequencies, and is NOT electromagnetic in nature. It is kinetic in nature.

Wake wrote:
Light is nothing more that higher frequency than Rush Limbaugh on your AM radio.

WRONG. Light is all frequencies of electromagnetic energy, including the AM radio band.

I love it when you demonstrate an understanding of science so poor that you have to stoop to things like "no sound radiates" when sound does not "radiate" but is a vibration in the air.

Wake wrote:
"Light" is a SPECIFIC set of electromagnetic frequencies from IR to UV.

Wake wrote:
And since you know nothing of quantum theory (aren't you the one claiming to have a PhD in Physics?) you haven't any idea what the Soval group said let alone meant.

StarMan wrote:
"Light" is a SPECIFIC set of electromagnetic frequencies from IR to UV."

That it is, Wade. Absolutely no question.

Wake wrote:

StarMan wrote:
"Light" is a SPECIFIC set of electromagnetic frequencies from IR to UV."

That it is, Wade. Absolutely no question.

It's like speaking to two year olds. THIS is the man who claimed to have a PhD in plasma physics. The only physics he knows about is contained in a couple of bottles that you have to take for two days before your semi-annual rectal examination.

Into the Night wrote:

Wake wrote:

StarMan wrote:
"Light" is a SPECIFIC set of electromagnetic frequencies from IR to UV."

That it is, Wade. Absolutely no question.

It's like speaking to two year olds. THIS is the man who claimed to have a PhD in plasma physics. The only physics he knows about is contained in a couple of bottles that you have to take for two days before your semi-annual rectal examination.

Okay, Wake...it's time to call you on the rug for your paradox.

If radio is NOT light, then the Universe is not all light as you say it is, is it?

If you widen your claim to include the electromagnetic energy of radio, than your whole insistence about light is fruitless, isn't it?

Make your mind dude.

Wake wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Wake wrote:

StarMan wrote:
"Light" is a SPECIFIC set of electromagnetic frequencies from IR to UV."

That it is, Wade. Absolutely no question.

It's like speaking to two year olds. THIS is the man who claimed to have a PhD in plasma physics. The only physics he knows about is contained in a couple of bottles that you have to take for two days before your semi-annual rectal examination.

Okay, Wake...it's time to call you on the rug for your paradox.

If radio is NOT light, then the Universe is not all light as you say it is, is it?

If you widen your claim to include the electromagnetic energy of radio, than your whole insistence about light is fruitless, isn't it?

Make your mind dude.

Please quote me where I ever said that the universe was "all light".

Tell us - are you on drugs of some sort? That's the only thing that could possibly explain you.

StarMan wrote:
noun
1. something that makes things visible or affords illumination:
All colors depend on light.
2.Physics.
Also called luminous energy, radiant energy. electromagnetic radiation to which the organs of sight react, ranging in wavelength from about 400 to 700 nm and propagated at a speed of 186,282 mi./sec (299,972 km/sec), considered variously as a wave, corpuscular, or quantum phenomenon.
a similar form of radiant energy that does not affect the retina, as ultraviolet or infrared rays.

Into the Night wrote:
Science has no 'elites' voting on theories and whether they are theories of science or not.

Into the Night wrote:

Wake wrote:

Into the Night wrote:

Wake wrote:

StarMan wrote:
"Light" is a SPECIFIC set of electromagnetic frequencies from IR to UV."

That it is, Wade. Absolutely no question.

It's like speaking to two year olds. THIS is the man who claimed to have a PhD in plasma physics. The only physics he knows about is contained in a couple of bottles that you have to take for two days before your semi-annual rectal examination.

Okay, Wake...it's time to call you on the rug for your paradox.

If radio is NOT light, then the Universe is not all light as you say it is, is it?

If you widen your claim to include the electromagnetic energy of radio, than your whole insistence about light is fruitless, isn't it?

Make your mind dude.

Please quote me where I ever said that the universe was "all light".

Tell us - are you on drugs of some sort? That's the only thing that could possibly explain you.

Then why are you arguing about light at all???

Wake wrote:
In case those drugs of yours haven't taken effect yet - it was YOU who are claiming that I'm talking about light and not electromagnetic radiation.

Tell us more about how you have ANY sort of college education let alone a PhD in plasma physics. In what universe did you think that you could get away with simply lying about anything that passed your way?

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:
In case those drugs of yours haven't taken effect yet - it was YOU who are claiming that I'm talking about light and not electromagnetic radiation.

Tell us more about how you have ANY sort of college education let alone a PhD in plasma physics. In what universe did you think that you could get away with simply lying about anything that passed your way?

You've gotten confused again. It's me who has the PhD in plasma physics.

Wake wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:
In case those drugs of yours haven't taken effect yet - it was YOU who are claiming that I'm talking about light and not electromagnetic radiation.

Tell us more about how you have ANY sort of college education let alone a PhD in plasma physics. In what universe did you think that you could get away with simply lying about anything that passed your way?

You've gotten confused again. It's me who has the PhD in plasma physics.

Pardon me - it's hard to tell the two of you apart since you are both loony tunes.

Imagine someone who claims to be a physicist who doesn't understand physics.

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:

Surface Detail wrote:

Wake wrote:
In case those drugs of yours haven't taken effect yet - it was YOU who are claiming that I'm talking about light and not electromagnetic radiation.

Tell us more about how you have ANY sort of college education let alone a PhD in plasma physics. In what universe did you think that you could get away with simply lying about anything that passed your way?

You've gotten confused again. It's me who has the PhD in plasma physics.

Pardon me - it's hard to tell the two of you apart since you are both loony tunes.

Imagine someone who claims to be a physicist who doesn't understand physics.

You're the one disagreeing with the textbooks, not me.

"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" woofed: QUOTE a textbook.....