24-01-2024 15:59 | |
GasGuzzler★★★★★ (2935) |
Jakob wrote: Why do you think your electricity is free? Hint: NOTHING is free. Who do you suppose is paying for it? You may have free choice but your system in NOT free markets. Radiation will not penetrate a perfect insulator, thus as I said space is not a perfect insulator.- Swan Edited on 24-01-2024 16:01 |
24-01-2024 17:26 | |
James_★★★★★ (2238) |
Jakob wrote: Yep, this definitely penalizes the working class. It's during their dinner time that electricity is most expensive. More affluent people do not eat dinner between 5 and 5 but will go out to eat. A flat rate or socialist pricing would've had a flat rate so the well to do would absorb some of the energy cost of those who eat at home. Gotta love capitalism, right GasGuzzler? |
24-01-2024 22:13 | |
Jakob★★☆☆☆ (218) |
GasGuzzler Why do you think your electricity is free? To make it simple for you, you can compare it to the greengrocer who has too many apples in stock at harvest time, and they rot for him at the same time that there is a large supply of fresh cheap apples on the market. Who will pay for the half rotten apples.? You may have free choice but your system in NOT free markets. Actually this far it is more the opposite. The market is free so any electricity producing company can sell power on equal terms if it can compete. And then I would like you to look at this again and this time also think about it: https://www.climate-debate.com/forum/how-can-climate-policy-prevent-wars--d7-e4783.php#post_101325 James_ Yep, this definitely penalizes the working class. It's during their dinner time that electricity is most expensive. More affluent people do not eat dinner between 5 and 5 but will go out to eat. If they eat out, the restaurant will pay more for electricity, and they will of course pass that bill on to the guests. And when rich people play golf Sunday afternoon the working class can wash their clothes and so on. Be flexible or pay. And if you have a good big amount of wind power it can be about a lot more than prime time. |
24-01-2024 22:32 | |
GasGuzzler★★★★★ (2935) |
Jakob wrote: Not so fast there, Sparky. You are not comparing rotten apples to rotten apples. Wind energy is not competing on equal terms with natural gas and coal electric production. Very rarely does Denmark produce 100% of electrical needs from wind, and those turbines are not cheap to purchase, install and maintain. Wind energy must receive huge amounts of money that is taken by your government through taxation, which is theft, from the company's producing reliable and cheap electricity using natural gas or coal. Keyword is "subsidy". You may get a " free " night now and then, but in the end you pay an assload for electricity... And your shorelines are ugly. Radiation will not penetrate a perfect insulator, thus as I said space is not a perfect insulator.- Swan |
25-01-2024 02:01 | |
James_★★★★★ (2238) |
GasGuzzler wrote:Jakob wrote: One issue with wind and solar energy is chaos math theory. How likely is it that a storm/clouds will block the Sun and what will be the average kWh during the day is reliable? While burning trees is considered green energy, how much is required for when wind and solar energy have a limited output? And when there's a surplus in energy, chances are the wind and solar energy machines will be idled to save wear and tear on them. It takes time to warm up a turbine using oil/natural gas or other combustive material. |
25-01-2024 15:54 | |
Jakob★★☆☆☆ (218) |
GasGuzzler Valid documentation for production prices and an overview of today's current raw electricity hourly prices for the electricity market in Western Europe should give you something good to think about. But it is probably unfortunately a waste of time in a world where people would rather create fiction than understand reality. Or spreading individual attitudes to a beautiful view than saving lives, spare nature and help the next generations. The price of electricity in Denmark is admittedly higher than the raw prices that I have linked to. A large part goes to the network that is expanded, just as you expand railways and roads when needed. It's called infrastructure, and any banana republic that wants to develop a civilization has to pay for it. In addition, there is a large tax which has two purposes, on the one hand, to give the state money for things on which it deems it sensible to spend money. It can be schools, hospitals, pensioners and even tax relief. In addition, this tax aims to lower energy consumption by increasing the incentive to save, choose energy-saving products and build smaller and better insulated houses, etc. All this is politics that might be wise but has nothing to do with the core of the free electricity market that I in this context am trying to focus on and make you understand. However while we're at it, how do you avoid paying for this (enjoy the view): https://www.energypolicytracker.org/G20-fossil-fuel-support/ Public financial flows to fossil fuels in G20 countries reached a record USD 1.4 trillion in 2022 James Maybe in the event of a hurricane, but in general windmills won't be idled to save wear and tear on them, but sometimes to prevent them from having to pay too much to get rid of the energy. |
25-01-2024 17:06 | |
James_★★★★★ (2238) |
Jakob wrote: Your primary source of power will be hydroelectric, nuclear and a steam driven turbine. The steam will be generated by burning something, wood chips, a cogen fuel, wood chips mixed with coal or other combustible material. Or just natural gas or whatever burns. When a wind turbine can't take a loss to get rid of power, it will be idled. The power plants in the first paragraph take longer to bring online or to take offline. So they stay online while green energy will start putting out less energy until they are idled. Wind and solar energy can be taken offline or brought back online much more quickly, why they handle the load to the grid above minimum working load. I think that's something they need to make known more when promoting green energy. There's the cost of extending the grid and then how much of the power supply can rely on green energy? My builds work then they might have a green energy source without creating more load for an overloaded electrical grid. |
25-01-2024 23:47 | |
Jakob★★☆☆☆ (218) |
James_ wrote: There is a limit to how flexible the consumers can be, so if we go all the way with windmills and solar panels it will in the end be up to the "Power To X" project. That will store the renewable energy so it can be saved for later use, and it is supposed to ensure the price never will be negative, and windmills never has to be stopped again, and fossil fuel will only be needed for a beholder we put in a museum. An open market is supposed to be transparent, so here you can see something about the actual mixture: https://www.energy-charts.info/charts/power/chart.htm?l=de&c=DK&stacking=stacked_absolute_area And the raw electricity prices again: https://www.nordpoolgroup.com/en/Market-data1/Dayahead/Area-Prices/DK/Hourly/?view=table (In my opinion normally too dull and stable these days. We need much more variety to train the small consumers to be flexible.) And if you scroll down a bit on this page you can see something about grid import and export: https://en.energinet.dk/ |
26-01-2024 00:49 | |
James_★★★★★ (2238) |
Jakob wrote: And basically what your power company knows that they have to be prepared for days when it's overcast with no wind. How can you create an electrical grid using renewable energy? Burning trees in a cycle that can be maintained is allowed for. With storing energy from windier/clearer days, batteries is about it unless you feel a hydroelectric power plant. Then it's save what you can. Not sure how people would like seeing water tanks everywhere. Then there's just lifting a heavy weight (50 ton stone?) and then generators would have on demand power. Myself, I tend to focus on sustainability. Basically industry needs to work with environmentalism. If it's profitable to use Sustainable Farming techniques then farmers (agricultural) community will use them. And with my European historical project, Leibniz was accused of plagiarism and it ruined his career. This was over Leibniz's work in calculus. Leibniz is also known to have watched Bessler's Wheel actually work for 2 hours. When Bessler was arrested because he was accused of fraud, Leibniz was one of his witnesses at court, why Bessler was found innocent. I will have math to show when the build is finished. A working wheel and math to go with it would support my theory that gravity has energy. I can't just say "I say this". I actually have to show an understanding of why and how do I know this. I'll post in the other thread. |
26-01-2024 04:33 | |
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14450) |
Jakob wrote: There is a limit to how flexible the consumers can be, Not for Gumby, and his pony pal Pokey too. Jakob wrote: ... so if we go all the way with windmills and solar panels it will in the end be up to the "Power To X" project. ... and Climate cannot abide that, and will never let it happen. Jakob wrote: That will store the renewable energy It can't store hydrocarbons. Jakob wrote: ... so it can be saved for later use, Isn't that what "store" and "save" mean? You don't need to explain that you store things so that you will have them over time. Jakob wrote: ... and fossil fuel will only be needed for a beholder we put in a museum. Enjoy your Marxist fantasy while you can before physics dashes your dreams. |
26-01-2024 05:50 | |
GasGuzzler★★★★★ (2935) |
Jakob wrote: Since you refuse to comment on this, I'm going to hit it one more time. College sports is a perfect analogy. Let's look at men's basketball. A lot of people are willing to pay to see men play basketball. The level at which they perform is fantastic. It's a great value for the money paid. Now I'm going to really step in the shit. Women's basketball does not enjoy the same attendance that men do. Without paying customers in high numbers, the cost to run the women's program is unsustainable without the revenue. However, women still play the game with comparable schedules to the men. The women's basketball program is most often FUNDED by the men. This is EXACTLY how your wind and solar are funded. Natural gas and coal are funding the high cost of Denmark's poor investment and transition to underperforming wind and solar. What is happening in Denmark is not free markets. I'm guessing you know this but you don't want anyone losing faith in your religion. Tell me I'm wrong. Radiation will not penetrate a perfect insulator, thus as I said space is not a perfect insulator.- Swan Edited on 26-01-2024 05:52 |
26-01-2024 13:36 | |
Jakob★★☆☆☆ (218) |
GasGuzzler I don't expect you to trust me about the free electricity market with hourly billing. Look at the documentation please. Does that look religious to you.? If it did to me I wouldn't have used it. What more do you want.? I already gave you my comment. If you have apples in stock that need to be sold before they rot, but you can't get the price you paid for them yourself because there are tons of cheap apples on the market because the apple harvest started earlier than you expected, is it then you who pay for the harvest, no right.? You just have to take the loss like a man, and if you haven't already calculated this loss, then you have to set the price higher and buy fewer apples next time close to harvest. In the same way, the players in the electricity market must calculate, and when it is not windy, the fossil plants must ensure that they charge such a high price that they can withstand a loss if it blows up more and faster than they could predict with the weather forecast. And when they make big mistakes, it can benefit electricity customers in the form of low hourly prices. If you hear people in the fossil industry complain and say all kind of bad things about windmills, it is ugly but maybe only natural. They miss the good old days when they had a monopoly on electricity production in a planned communist system. But in Denmark and in most of Western Europe those days are thankfully over. It was a milestone into the better future, and we didn't do it because it was easy. We did it because it was HARD.! Just kidding. It was almost a piece of cake but for reasons that can make me angry it looks like the next milestones might be a lot more difficult to reach fast. |
26-01-2024 17:10 | |
James_★★★★★ (2238) |
GasGuzzler wrote:Jakob wrote: It's possible that Swan is using multiple profiles in here. He claims to be schizophrenic and using multiple profiles would show he has mental health issues. Of course if he wants to fake mental health issues then that's okay, right? His "partner" rlortie taught him that if you have friends vouching for you then you're automatically credible and there's no need to learn or to get along with other people. It is how they "taught" people. That or saying explain it to me so I can help you when they don't understand what's being said. It's like the movie The Sting, fake it until you can scam them. |
26-01-2024 19:36 | |
Jakob★★☆☆☆ (218) |
James_ wrote: Good, and then please remember to keep it there. |
26-01-2024 19:55 | |
GasGuzzler★★★★★ (2935) |
Jakob wrote: The billing system is not your religion, although it gives you a huge boner for some reason. You faith in the ability of carbon dioxide to defy physics by warming the planet without additional energy is your religion. Say the going rate for candy bars is $2. You are stupid and you buy a candy bar from me on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday for $8 each day. On Friday I give you a "free" candy bar. If you think free candy bar Friday is a good deal, then by all means, let's do business. You like Snickers? Enjoy your free electricity, for which you pay the highest rate on Earth. Radiation will not penetrate a perfect insulator, thus as I said space is not a perfect insulator.- Swan |
26-01-2024 20:58 | |
Spongy Iris★★★★☆ (1643) |
The hourly billing system is a way for people with enough time on their hands to try and game the system by using energy when nobody else is, and not using energy when everybody else is. The irony is that people with enough time on their hands don't need to nickel and dime the energy companies. Mostly just complicated math that nobody cares about. In terms of which current energies are best at fighting climate change, that is natural gas and unleaded gasoline. |
26-01-2024 21:03 | |
James_★★★★★ (2238) |
Jakob wrote: Alan, I'll be glad when I can get away from you. And Alan, you'll get credit for teaching me. But since what you taught me is about greatness and nothing about me having a family, I'll let you do it. And yet people will say I should thank you for encouraging me to learn so I could serve you. And when I do nothing for nobody, people will ask me why not. And I'll ask who kept me safe from you? No one was willing to help me to not keep being molested by you yet different forums told me I had to be nice to you. How did the call to my father go? Did he want me molested by you? Edited on 26-01-2024 21:24 |
26-01-2024 21:35 | |
Spongy Iris★★★★☆ (1643) |
Jakob wrote: Says the conversation Nazi. |
26-01-2024 22:30 | |
Jakob★★☆☆☆ (218) |
GasGuzzler wrote: Oh no, don't try to bribe me with Friday candy, that's not fair, that's almost the only thing I can't resist.! I have even considered sneaking a large sum of money out of the family budget to ensure a daily delivery which I could imagine to others was very cheap. Only my honesty and strong character have stopped me, but it is not easy. I am kidding again and referring to something else: https://www.energypolicytracker.org/G20-fossil-fuel-support/
You didn't know about this, did you.? |
26-01-2024 22:47 | |
Jakob★★☆☆☆ (218) |
Spongy Iris wrote: Unless you can automate it in a way that almost everyone can afford. I am actually working on such a project. And otherwise, I don't think you need to feel sorry for the fact that the unemployed can save a penny that the sandwich maid can't because she works. It might give the unemployed person the means to buy an extra piece, so that the sandwich maiden can get more pay and better afford to pay for her expenses. |
26-01-2024 22:53 | |
Jakob★★☆☆☆ (218) |
Spongy Iris wrote:Jakob wrote: If you think it's Nazism to try to keep a bit of order on the topics in a forum, so that not all threads are about the same thing, then you don't know what really characterizes Nazism. |
26-01-2024 23:09 | |
GasGuzzler★★★★★ (2935) |
Jakob wrote: I did know this sad bit of news. The world shut down for COVID, and governments, including ours, paid people to sit on their assets and produce nothing, while collecting help for their utility bills. Total bullshit. That was a big part of the 1.4 trillion . It was not to prop up a business that would otherwise fail. Wind and solar, on the other hand, need to be propped up or they will fail. For what they produce, they are way too expensive. ...but this is all pretty stupid to waste time on when you still have not described in your own words how CO2 warms the earth. Are you capable of that? Radiation will not penetrate a perfect insulator, thus as I said space is not a perfect insulator.- Swan |
26-01-2024 23:12 | |
Spongy Iris★★★★☆ (1643) |
Jakob wrote: It's a dictator move to demand others stick to your chosen topic, rather than respecting others choices. |
26-01-2024 23:21 | |
Spongy Iris★★★★☆ (1643) |
Jakob wrote: I don't know. My heaviest energy use is when it's cold at night, when the heat comes on, and gasoline to drive. If I was unemployed, I don't imagine I would be able to live for very long. |
27-01-2024 00:32 | |
James_★★★★★ (2238) |
Spongy Iris wrote:Jakob wrote: What was it Jubat who is not ab hammer who is not Alan Bauldree tell me? As long as I'm alive and he's alive, he'll be coming for me. Ruining my life is his reason for living. It lets him know that as a Christian he is better than me because Jesus died on the cross for HIM. Attached image: |
27-01-2024 01:32 | |
Spongy Iris★★★★☆ (1643) |
James_ wrote:Spongy Iris wrote:Jakob wrote: Well you can't bring up dying on a cross and not expect to trigger me into responding with this urban dictionary link. https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=sexual%20crucifixion Maybe it's like Swan said, microwaves cook food from the outside not the inside. |
27-01-2024 02:59 | |
James_★★★★★ (2238) |
Spongy Iris wrote:James_ wrote:Spongy Iris wrote:Jakob wrote: I have something better than that. If I do anything with perpetual motion or science, you'll have to be there. And you will need to approve of everything. If I can handle it for 18 years then the world can handle it as well. And when you approve of something, you'll need to tell everyone what to do. It'll be your show just as in any forum. And best of all, you'll be representing Jesus and why he died on the cross for you. And if you don't agree then I won't do anything. Your Jesus said on Earth as it is in Heaven. In today's terms, online as it is offline. Then if you deserve credit for teaching me, you'll receive it. But if you can't discuss things then that will mean the internet supports predators. |
27-01-2024 03:18 | |
Spongy Iris★★★★☆ (1643) |
James_ wrote:Spongy Iris wrote:James_ wrote:Spongy Iris wrote:Jakob wrote: What in the Sam Hell are you talking about??? |
27-01-2024 11:01 | |
Jakob★★☆☆☆ (218) |
GasGuzzler wrote: Why do you think it was COVID when they write that it was Russia's invasion of Ukraine.? Was it just too much to ask you to red the first two lines of the documentation.? https://www.energypolicytracker.org/G20-fossil-fuel-support/ The 2022 energy price crisis, brought about by Russia's invasion of Ukraine, has catapulted public financial support for fossil fuels to new levels. G20 governments were quick to cushion the effects of peaking fossil fuel prices and bolster energy supplies, providing a staggering USD 1.4 trillion in the form of subsidies, investments by state-owned enterprises (SOEs), and lending from public financial institutions (PFIs). While much of this was support for consumers, around one third (USD 440 billion) was driving investment in new fossil fuel production. (USD 440 billion) was driving investment in new fossil fuel production. You could have bought a lot of windmills for that amount of money. And the price on wind is pretty stable. I see you also forgot to think about this documentation: https://www.climate-debate.com/forum/the-usa-electricity-system-hourly-billing--d9-e4787-s40.php#post_101554 I could tell you about CO2 but it is not the subject, and I would like you to realize that changing the billing system and switching to renewable energy makes very good sense even without the CO2 problem. |
27-01-2024 19:02 | |
IBdaMann★★★★★ (14450) |
Jakob wrote:And otherwise, I don't think you need to feel sorry for the fact that the unemployed can save a penny that the sandwich maid can't because she works. This is wrong. The sandwich maid is adding value to society and should be rewarded, not penalized, for doing so. The unemployed who are not adding value should not be rewarded for their lack of value added. Your characterization of such penalties as "a penny" is a bogus attempt to fool others into legitimizing the "nickel and dime" front of the Marxist war on capitalism. |
27-01-2024 22:19 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21628) |
Jakob wrote: The war in Ukraine have nothing to do with Biden banning oil drilling by executive orders. Jakob wrote: Do you have a red highlighter? I can't find mine. Jakob wrote: Wind is the 2nd most expensive method to create electricity. It's piddle power. It also does not work in high or low wind conditions or during icing conditions. ALL of the wind generators in Washington State (where I live) combined, which cover vast tracts of land, do not equal the power that can be generated in a single coal plant. Jakob wrote: This isn't documentation. Pivot fallacy. Jakob wrote: It IS the subject. See the title at the top of this forum. It says 'Climate-Debate', and the Church of Global Warming is always going on about the properties of Holy Magick Gas such as CO2 or methane. Your denial of the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law is your problem. You know nothing about CO2. Jakob wrote: Electricity is billed by watt-hour. In most cases a monthly bill. You are making a mountain out of nothing. It makes no difference how often electricity is billed. There is no 'CO2 problem'. CO2 is an absolutely necessary gas for life to exist on Earth. Now it's time for me to crack open a soda and release more CO2 into the atmosphere. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan Edited on 27-01-2024 22:20 |
27-01-2024 22:22 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21628) |
Jakob wrote: In most places, no. Nor is it necessary. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
27-01-2024 22:27 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21628) |
Jakob wrote: There is no 'USA billing system' for electricity. Communism is not a form of government. Bananas are not a republic. Jakob wrote: You have no context. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
27-01-2024 22:29 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21628) |
Jakob wrote: RQAA. Repetitive Question Already Answered. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
27-01-2024 22:30 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21628) |
GasGuzzler wrote:Jakob wrote: There is no 'US billing system'. Different utilities across the country bill in their own way. Usually, it's just monthly billing. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
27-01-2024 22:43 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21628) |
Jakob wrote: Yes you are. Stop trying to deny your own posts. Jakob wrote: Do you feel you are in some kind of danger? Perhaps you're just paranoid. Jakob wrote: They are generally read by a guy walking up to the meter and reading it once a month. Same as a water meter or gas meter. The newer ones have little radio transmitters in them so they can read it as they drive by in their truck. They still come by about once a month. Meters have no internet connection or connection to any communications network. Jakob wrote: Electricity costs the same to produce regardless of whether it's 'prime time' or any other time. Jakob wrote: Electricity costs the same to produce, watt for watt. There is no 'higher price for prime time'. Jakob wrote: Electricity costs the same to produce regardless of time of day or night. Jakob wrote: If someone wants to use more electricity, they pay for the extra watt-hours, just as someone using more water pays for the amount of water they use. Jakob wrote: Nope. Electricity costs the same to produce, watt for watt, regardless of time of day or night. Jakob wrote: Communism isn't a power system. Bananas are not a power system. Republicans aren't bananas. Jakob wrote: Never existed in the first place. Bananas have never been Republicans, power systems, governments, or nations. Jakob wrote: A meter is not infrastructure. Developing civilization cannot occur where there is already civilization. It is not a market in and of itself. Communism is not capitalism. Jakob wrote: A meter is not a market, a Republican, a banana, a nation, nor an infrastructure. Jakob wrote: What must be done quickly?? Jakob wrote: What goal?? You haven't stated any! The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
27-01-2024 22:55 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21628) |
Jakob wrote: Apparently you do. You keep trying to insult them, dictate stupid things as if you were king, and try to manufacture a 'crisis' out of nothing. Jakob wrote: Bananas have no politics. They are just bananas. There is no such thing as a republican banana. Jakob wrote: Supply always meets demand, hour to hour, minute to minute, second to second. If it doesn't, the power goes out. Jakob wrote: Like I said. Jakob wrote: So? Jakob wrote: Using more coal to meet demand does not increase the cost of a watt-hour of electricity. Jakob wrote: They can. Just grab a shovel and put more coal in the firebox. Of course, these days, they automate the process using conveyors. Jakob wrote: Nope. The head of steam is already built up. The output of a generator can be controlled second by second. Jakob wrote: Nope. The output of a generator can be controlled second by second. Jakob wrote: There is no 'waste' of electricity. There is no 'venting' of electricity to anywhere. The generator simply produces exactly the amount of electricity required, no more, no less. It adjusts second by second to the demand. That's what the regulator and sync circuit does. Jakob wrote: If demand drops, the generator simply produces less. Jakob wrote: If demand rises, the generator simply produces more. Jakob wrote: There is no 'wasted' electricity. Generator output is adjusted second by second. There is no 'venting of electricity' to anywhere. Jakob wrote: Meters do not generate electricity or change how electricity is generated. Jakob wrote: No, you aren't. You are deathly afraid of CO2 (and probably methane as well). The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
27-01-2024 22:57 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21628) |
Jakob wrote: No point. Different utilities charge differently. Usually it's just a monthly bill. Meters are just read by hand or by a passing truck via a low power radio. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
27-01-2024 23:02 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21628) |
Jakob wrote: It isn't. It costs the same to produce electricity, whether you produce 1 watt or 10 watts. It costs the same regardless of the time of day or night. You have not even defined what 'prime time' is. Jakob wrote: Your explanation ignores Ohms law, Faraday's law, and power plant engineering practices, developed by Westinghouse. Jakob wrote: If you have daily blackouts at any time you need more generating capacity. No meter will change that. Jakob wrote: No. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
27-01-2024 23:03 | |
Into the Night★★★★★ (21628) |
GasGuzzler wrote:Jakob wrote: Well put. His infatuation with metering isn't going to create a single needed watt of electricity. The Parrot Killer Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan |
Threads | Replies | Last post |
Project for the production of electricity | 3 | 24-04-2024 16:04 |
The new USA electric tank, the dumbest invention in the history of warfare | 0 | 05-01-2024 15:27 |
Palestinians are now murdering Jews in the USA. FBI does nothing as usual, lock and load | 4 | 12-11-2023 15:30 |
Electricity | 19 | 07-08-2023 19:11 |
USD US Dollar, USA United States Are Deserved To Be Gone Forever ! | 2 | 20-07-2023 22:43 |