Remember me
▼ Content

There is no mathematical and scientific foundation nor any experimental evidence of the greenhouse effect


There is no mathematical and scientific foundation nor any experimental evidence of the greenhouse effect, so16-01-2016 05:56
Tai Hai Chen
★★★★☆
(1077)
so what's the big deal? It's not even like the black hole which has indisputable mathematical and scientific foundation.

Look how Gore got it all wrong. Statistics 101. Gore, please learn that. CO2 increased from 280 ppm to 403 ppm. No increase in temperature. The scientific method proves the greenhouse effect hypothesis incorrect.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JIuKjaY3r4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2sKX20WhKS4
Edited on 16-01-2016 05:59
16-01-2016 06:08
Tai Hai Chen
★★★★☆
(1077)
Ted Cruz says the greenhouse effect hypothesis is not science, it is religion, because it relies on faith.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BymuYDFoCT8
Edited on 16-01-2016 06:09
16-01-2016 06:12
Tai Hai Chen
★★★★☆
(1077)
If the greenhouse effect is real, why can't anyone mathematically prove it, like the way the black hole is mathematically proven? Why is there no experimental evidence of it? There is 0 change in temperature after a 44% increase in CO2.

There is, as expected, experimental evidence of the greening of Earth due to increase in CO2.

http://phys.org/news/2013-07-greening-co2.html

http://www.csiro.au/en/News/News-releases/2013/Deserts-greening-from-rising-CO2
Edited on 16-01-2016 06:23
16-01-2016 06:37
Tai Hai Chen
★★★★☆
(1077)
On second thought, even the mysterious black hole has strong evidence.

http://hubblesite.org/reference_desk/faq/answer.php.id=64&cat=exotic


In comparison, the greenhouse theory has no evidence at all. 0 temperature change after a 44% increase in CO2. What a joke.
16-01-2016 06:57
Tai Hai Chen
★★★★☆
(1077)
this is quite interesting


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IV5MFDH8bV4
Edited on 16-01-2016 06:57
16-01-2016 18:59
Tai Hai Chen
★★★★☆
(1077)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1ynmXamzM8
Edited on 16-01-2016 19:18




Join the debate There is no mathematical and scientific foundation nor any experimental evidence of the greenhouse effect:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
There is no scientific theory or evidence that suggest CO2 traps heat better than O2 or N24020-11-2019 11:11
So what if the Chinese fossil fuel industry pays me to spread lies about greenhouse gas?7515-11-2019 04:47
Greenhouse Gases Do NOT Violate The Stefan-Boltzmann Law74208-11-2019 19:42
Evidence of rapid climate change!012-10-2019 06:09
I don't believe CO2 makes air hotter because I don't see any experimental proof509-10-2019 03:15
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2019 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact