Remember me
▼ Content

slackers


slackers30-01-2024 20:52
keepit
★★★★★
(3037)
We need more slackers. There are people in the world out there that are wound tighter than an angry rattlesnake.
Edited on 30-01-2024 20:52
30-01-2024 21:36
James_
★★★★★
(2014)
keepit wrote:
We need more slackers. There are people in the world out there that are wound tighter than an angry rattlesnake.



And considering how math and science can allow for our atmosphere is like
meditating. Then it becomes a flow of energy that has different expressions. It's like when you see that stratospheric ozone is concentrating near the polar jet stream aka, Norwegian jet stream will shift south of the densest part of the ozone layer.
And where the stratosphere is the warmest the troposphere cools. And where the most ozone is it will be the warmest. And then the polar vortex shifts south to counter the warm stratosphere/ozone layer. Yep, thinking about it is just like meditating.
30-01-2024 21:49
keepit
★★★★★
(3037)
Yes ... and so forth ...
Edited on 30-01-2024 21:49
30-01-2024 21:50
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(21535)
James_ wrote:
keepit wrote:
We need more slackers. There are people in the world out there that are wound tighter than an angry rattlesnake.



And considering how math and science can allow for our atmosphere is like
meditating. Then it becomes a flow of energy that has different expressions. It's like when you see that stratospheric ozone is concentrating near the polar jet stream aka, Norwegian jet stream will shift south of the densest part of the ozone layer.
And where the stratosphere is the warmest the troposphere cools. And where the most ozone is it will be the warmest. And then the polar vortex shifts south to counter the warm stratosphere/ozone layer. Yep, thinking about it is just like meditating.


The atmosphere does not need to be 'allowed' by anything. It simply exists.
The atmosphere is not energy.
The ozone layer is not concentrating anywhere.
You cannot reduce entropy.
Ozone is not a temperature.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan
30-01-2024 22:03
keepit
★★★★★
(3037)
These are mostly imaginary things you are arguing against.

If you want to be a scientist, take the appropriate course of study from credentialed scientists and become a scientist.
Edited on 30-01-2024 22:08
30-01-2024 23:28
IBdaMannProfile picture★★★★★
(14338)
keepit wrote: These are mostly imaginary things you are arguing against.

To whom are you speaking? Are you talking to yourself?

keepit wrote: If you want to be a scientist, take the appropriate course of study from credentialed scientists and become a scientist.

Stay away from "credentials" and gravitate towards those who can teach.
31-01-2024 00:56
James_
★★★★★
(2014)
Into the Night wrote:
James_ wrote:
keepit wrote:
We need more slackers. There are people in the world out there that are wound tighter than an angry rattlesnake.



And considering how math and science can allow for our atmosphere is like
meditating. Then it becomes a flow of energy that has different expressions. It's like when you see that stratospheric ozone is concentrating near the polar jet stream aka, Norwegian jet stream will shift south of the densest part of the ozone layer.
And where the stratosphere is the warmest the troposphere cools. And where the most ozone is it will be the warmest. And then the polar vortex shifts south to counter the warm stratosphere/ozone layer. Yep, thinking about it is just like meditating.


The atmosphere does not need to be 'allowed' by anything. It simply exists.
The atmosphere is not energy.
The ozone layer is not concentrating anywhere.
You cannot reduce entropy.
Ozone is not a temperature.



The atmosphere does not need to be 'allowed' by anything. It simply exists.


And yet if pollution can harm the atmosphere we should do nothing?

The atmosphere is not energy.


If energy did not exist then how can we perceive it? That's actually what math is for in a sense. If the day is warmer than the night because the troposphere is expanding and then is allowed to slowly retract/collapse, the change in a column of water or mercury shows a change in the level/amount of energy in the atmosphere. That is why there are both low and high pressure systems exist.
31-01-2024 05:23
Into the NightProfile picture★★★★★
(21535)
James_ wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
James_ wrote:
keepit wrote:
We need more slackers. There are people in the world out there that are wound tighter than an angry rattlesnake.



And considering how math and science can allow for our atmosphere is like
meditating. Then it becomes a flow of energy that has different expressions. It's like when you see that stratospheric ozone is concentrating near the polar jet stream aka, Norwegian jet stream will shift south of the densest part of the ozone layer.
And where the stratosphere is the warmest the troposphere cools. And where the most ozone is it will be the warmest. And then the polar vortex shifts south to counter the warm stratosphere/ozone layer. Yep, thinking about it is just like meditating.


The atmosphere does not need to be 'allowed' by anything. It simply exists.
The atmosphere is not energy.
The ozone layer is not concentrating anywhere.
You cannot reduce entropy.
Ozone is not a temperature.



The atmosphere does not need to be 'allowed' by anything. It simply exists.


And yet if pollution can harm the atmosphere we should do nothing?

Define 'pollution'. How does this so-called 'pollution' harm the atmosphere?
James_ wrote:
The atmosphere is not energy.

If energy did not exist then how can we perceive it?

The atmosphere is not energy.
James_ wrote:
That's actually what math is for in a sense.

Math is not energy.
James_ wrote:
If the day is warmer than the night because the troposphere is expanding

The troposphere does not expand.
James_ wrote:
and then is allowed to slowly retract/collapse, the change in a column of water or mercury shows a change in the level/amount of energy in the atmosphere.

The troposphere does not contract or collapse. Atmospheric pressure is not energy.
James_ wrote:
That is why there are both low and high pressure systems exist.


The atmosphere is not energy.


The Parrot Killer

Debunked in my sig. - tmiddles

Google keeps track of paranoid talk and i'm not on their list. I've been evaluated and certified. - keepit

nuclear powered ships do not require nuclear fuel. - Swan

While it is true that fossils do not burn it is also true that fossil fuels burn very well - Swan




Join the debate slackers:

Remember me

▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Who is leading the renewable energy race?

US

EU

China

Japan

India

Brazil

Other

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2020 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact