|Greenhouse gases, explained24-03-2019 00:59|
|Tai Hai Chen★★★★☆
I tend to think that we've still have a lot to learn about our atmosphere. What scientists haven't shown is how changing the composition of atmospheric gases increases the number of collisions that molecules in our atmosphere have.
I've actually have started looking at how a different explanation can allow for the stratosphere to be up to 0° C.
It is pretty accepted that the temperature in the troposphere is directly related to the number of collisions that molecules have.
And now for the 3 Horned Toad to respond because it sees what it believes to be helpless prey.
p.s., Horned and horny are interchangeable as well as Toad and toads.
James___ wrote: What scientists haven't shown is how changing the composition of atmospheric gases increases the number of collisions that molecules in our atmosphere have.
I think you mean to say what science shows ... and science does, in fact, show this. Science doesn't use your conceptualiztion, however, of "number of collisions.". Science simply refers to pressure in the Ideal Gas Law.
So, good news! You're done and your questions are answered.
Let me know if I can be of any more help.
Global Warming: The preferred religion of the scientifically illiterate.
Ceist - I couldn't agree with you more. But when money and religion are involved, and there are people who value them above all else, then the lies begin. - trafn
You are completely misunderstanding their use of the word "accumulation"! - Climate Scientist.
The Stefan-Boltzman equation doesn't come up with the correct temperature if greenhouse gases are not considered - Hank
:*sigh* Not the "raw data" crap. - Leafsdude
IB STILL hasn't explained what Planck's Law means. Just more hand waving that it applies to everything and more asserting that the greenhouse effect 'violates' it.- Ceist
|City of Toronto staff to explore cost of climate change, legal options for compensation from greenhouse g||0||26-04-2019 15:37|
|What a Greenhouse is for IBdaMann||8||15-04-2019 00:43|
|Greenhouse gas hypothesis violates Law of Conservation of Energy||2||18-03-2019 18:56|
|It is ridiculous to suggest N2 and O2 are not greenhouse gases just because the don't absorb IR||3||24-02-2019 22:09|
|How are O2 and N2 not greenhouse gases?||12||12-02-2019 01:36|