Remember me
▼ Content

Arctic waters not freezing



Page 18 of 18<<<161718
05-06-2017 23:53
litesong
★★★★☆
(1080)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" woofs: danger of global warming there were only 5,000 polar bears left. Now we're down to 25,000.


Also, from "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up": ships are running into blue whales that were on the edge of extinction only two decades ago.
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" keeps relying on the bans to hunting Polar Bears & Blue Whales, pretending their increased numbers disprove AGW.
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" is an old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner woofer.
06-06-2017 00:04
Wake
★★★★☆
(1195)
litesong wrote:
His usual noise. He grows ever more violently angry since he cannot get a single thing right. But when you're a doper your brain turns off.
07-06-2017 00:51
litesong
★★★★☆
(1080)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" woofs: His usual noise......

..... & always true. Ah.... "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" thinks truth is noise. That's why the math of "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" is wrong.
07-06-2017 02:28
Wake
★★★★☆
(1195)
litesong wrote:


The cocaine is on your nostrils.
08-06-2017 01:58
litesong
★★★★☆
(1080)
litesong wrote:May 1, 1979 sea ice VOLUME was ~ 32000 cubic kilometers. Average Arctic sea ice VOLUME for May 1, for the period 1980-89, was ~ 30,600 cubic kilometers. May 1, 2013 sea ice VOLUME was ~24,100 cubic kilometers, 6500 cubic kilometers less than the May 1 period for the 1980's. Present May 1, 2017 sea ice VOLUME is ~20,700 cubic kilometers, 9900 cubic kilometers less than the May 1 period for the 1980's.
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner bluffing badnight" is silly, uneducated, & doesn't care to be educated, when it blabs that a new ice age has arrived & AGW is nothin' to worra 'bout.


June 1, 1979 Arctic sea ice VOLUME was ~ 30000 cubic kilometers. Average Arctic sea ice VOLUME for June 1, for the period 1980-89, was ~29,500 cubic kilometers. Present June 1, 2017 Arctic sea ice VOLUME is ~18,000 cubic kilometers, ~ 11,500 cubic kilometers less than the June 1 period for the 1980's. June 1, 2017 Arctic sea ice VOLUME is ~ 12,000 cubic kilometers LESS than that of the same date for 1979. The energy to melt such a VOLUME of ice is almost 37 times the annual energy consumption of the U.S.
08-06-2017 02:07
litesong
★★★★☆
(1080)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" woofs: The cocaine is on your nostrils.

Ah.... "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" is downwind of itself.
Edited on 08-06-2017 02:08
08-06-2017 02:14
Wake
★★★★☆
(1195)
litesong wrote:


Maybe that cocaine is why you can't make any sense.
08-06-2017 02:37
Wake
★★★★☆
(1195)
litesong wrote:June 1, 1979 Arctic sea ice VOLUME was ~ 30000 cubic kilometers. Average Arctic sea ice VOLUME for June 1, for the period 1980-89, was ~29,500 cubic kilometers. Present June 1, 2017 Arctic sea ice VOLUME is ~18,000 cubic kilometers


Most people are smart enough to know that the ice was only MEASURED starting in 1979 and so less ice now than in 1979 means nothing. But to Chief Litebrain it means the sky is falling.
08-06-2017 05:02
litesong
★★★★☆
(1080)
Wake wrote:
litesong wrote:June 1, 1979 Arctic sea ice VOLUME was ~ 30000 cubic kilometers. Average Arctic sea ice VOLUME for June 1, for the period 1980-89, was ~29,500 cubic kilometers. Present June 1, 2017 Arctic sea ice VOLUME is ~18,000 cubic kilometers


Most people are smart enough to know that the ice was only MEASURED starting in 1979 and so less ice now than in 1979 means nothing. But to Chief Litebrain it means the sky is falling.

The solar TSI has been languid for decades & low for 10+ years(including a 3+ year period of TSI low, setting a 100 year record). Monthly global temperatures have been over the 20th century average for 388+ months. In essence, even monthly cold weather conditions can no longer penetrate the increasing infra-red energy absorbed & redirected back to Earth by GHGs, now stored in Earth's bio-sphere.
To end wake's quote of my data, present Arctic sea ice VOLUME is 11,000+ cubic kilometers less than average 1980's years for Arctic sea ice VOLUME. NOT till present Arctic sea VOLUME returns to the quantities of the 1980's, can AGW denier liar whiners pretend that ice age conditions have returned..... AND it ain't goin' to happen.
08-06-2017 15:50
Wake
★★★★☆
(1195)
litesong wrote: That it doesn't matter that he is telling us that the ice is at the lowest ever despite only having 50 years of records.


And another one bites the dust. You Indians believe that since you beat Custer you won the war. You kept repeating it to yourselves on the Trail of Tears.
08-06-2017 20:46
Into the Night
★★★★★
(2646)
Wake wrote:
litesong wrote: That it doesn't matter that he is telling us that the ice is at the lowest ever despite only having 50 years of records.


And another one bites the dust. You Indians believe that since you beat Custer you won the war. You kept repeating it to yourselves on the Trail of Tears.


The Trail of Tears wasn't a war. It was theft. Why we put the jerk that did it on our $20 bill is beyond me.


The Parrot Killer
08-06-2017 21:18
Wake
★★★★☆
(1195)
Into the Night wrote:
Wake wrote:
litesong wrote: That it doesn't matter that he is telling us that the ice is at the lowest ever despite only having 50 years of records.


And another one bites the dust. You Indians believe that since you beat Custer you won the war. You kept repeating it to yourselves on the Trail of Tears.


The Trail of Tears wasn't a war. It was theft. Why we put the jerk that did it on our $20 bill is beyond me.


Apparently you are completely unaware of what happened.
08-06-2017 22:11
Into the Night
★★★★★
(2646)
Wake wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Wake wrote:
litesong wrote: That it doesn't matter that he is telling us that the ice is at the lowest ever despite only having 50 years of records.


And another one bites the dust. You Indians believe that since you beat Custer you won the war. You kept repeating it to yourselves on the Trail of Tears.


The Trail of Tears wasn't a war. It was theft. Why we put the jerk that did it on our $20 bill is beyond me.


Apparently you are completely unaware of what happened.


I am very aware what happened. Jackson ordered troops to enter indian nations, kill the men that opposed them, and drove the rest off their lands. The refugees had little food or water, lost everything, and headed west. Many died. He then turned around and sold that land for a tidy profit for he and his cronies. He was openly a bigot and a racist and felt the indian didn't deserve to own land. It was the beginning of what later became the indian 'reservations'.

It's really no wonder many tribal nations took a more militant attitude to anyone entering their lands, after they saw what happened to the Cherokee and other tribes.

Do you think you can summarize the history of the indian tribes in one event such as this?


The Parrot Killer
Edited on 08-06-2017 22:12
09-06-2017 00:41
Wake
★★★★☆
(1195)
Into the Night wrote:
Wake wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Wake wrote:
litesong wrote: That it doesn't matter that he is telling us that the ice is at the lowest ever despite only having 50 years of records.


And another one bites the dust. You Indians believe that since you beat Custer you won the war. You kept repeating it to yourselves on the Trail of Tears.


The Trail of Tears wasn't a war. It was theft. Why we put the jerk that did it on our $20 bill is beyond me.


Apparently you are completely unaware of what happened.


I am very aware what happened. Jackson ordered troops to enter indian nations, kill the men that opposed them, and drove the rest off their lands. The refugees had little food or water, lost everything, and headed west. Many died. He then turned around and sold that land for a tidy profit for he and his cronies. He was openly a bigot and a racist and felt the indian didn't deserve to own land. It was the beginning of what later became the indian 'reservations'.

It's really no wonder many tribal nations took a more militant attitude to anyone entering their lands, after they saw what happened to the Cherokee and other tribes.

Do you think you can summarize the history of the indian tribes in one event such as this?


That's what I said - you have absolutely no idea of what happened.
09-06-2017 01:54
Into the Night
★★★★★
(2646)
Wake wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Wake wrote:
Into the Night wrote:
Wake wrote:
litesong wrote: That it doesn't matter that he is telling us that the ice is at the lowest ever despite only having 50 years of records.


And another one bites the dust. You Indians believe that since you beat Custer you won the war. You kept repeating it to yourselves on the Trail of Tears.


The Trail of Tears wasn't a war. It was theft. Why we put the jerk that did it on our $20 bill is beyond me.


Apparently you are completely unaware of what happened.


I am very aware what happened. Jackson ordered troops to enter indian nations, kill the men that opposed them, and drove the rest off their lands. The refugees had little food or water, lost everything, and headed west. Many died. He then turned around and sold that land for a tidy profit for he and his cronies. He was openly a bigot and a racist and felt the indian didn't deserve to own land. It was the beginning of what later became the indian 'reservations'.

It's really no wonder many tribal nations took a more militant attitude to anyone entering their lands, after they saw what happened to the Cherokee and other tribes.

Do you think you can summarize the history of the indian tribes in one event such as this?


That's what I said - you have absolutely no idea of what happened.


All right...let's hear your version. Do not use links or quotes.


The Parrot Killer
Edited on 09-06-2017 01:55
18-06-2017 00:35
litesong
★★★★☆
(1080)
litesong wrote:The solar TSI has been languid for decades & low for 10+ years(including a 3+ year period of TSI low, setting a 100 year record). Monthly global temperatures have been over the 20th century average for 388+ months. In essence, even monthly cold weather conditions can no longer penetrate the increasing infra-red energy absorbed & redirected back to Earth by GHGs, now stored in Earth's bio-sphere.
To end wake's quote of my data, present Arctic sea ice VOLUME is 11,000+ cubic kilometers less than average 1980's years for Arctic sea ice VOLUME. NOT till present Arctic sea VOLUME returns to the quantities of the 1980's, can AGW denier liar whiners pretend that ice age conditions have returned..... AND it ain't goin' to happen.

Three of the years of great Arctic sea ice loss(2012, 2016, 2017) showed wide variations of 1.1+ million square kilometers of sea ice loss during the late May-early June periods. However, at this date of those years, the three are within a fifth of a million square miles of each other.... all nice & cozy.... except 2016 is still nearly 2 million square miles less than the average of the 1980's.
18-06-2017 15:46
Wake
★★★★☆
(1195)
litesong wrote:And more psychotic reactions
18-06-2017 21:20
litesong
★★★★☆
(1080)
litesong wrote:The solar TSI has been languid for decades & low for 10+ years(including a 3+ year period of TSI low, setting a 100 year record). Monthly global temperatures have been over the 20th century average for 388+ months. In essence, even monthly cold weather conditions can no longer penetrate the increasing infra-red energy absorbed & redirected back to Earth by GHGs, now stored in Earth's bio-sphere.
To end wake's quote of my data, present Arctic sea ice VOLUME is 11,000+ cubic kilometers less than average 1980's years for Arctic sea ice VOLUME. NOT till present Arctic sea VOLUME returns to the quantities of the 1980's, can AGW denier liar whiners pretend that ice age conditions have returned..... AND it ain't goin' to happen.
Three of the years of great Arctic sea ice loss(2012, 2016, 2017) showed wide variations of 1.1+ million square kilometers of sea ice loss during the late May-early June periods. However, at this date of those years, the three are within a fifth of a million square miles of each other.... all nice & cozy.... except 2016 is still nearly 2 million square miles less than the average of the 1980's.
Wake wrote:....more psychotic(sic) reactions

Yes, "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" believes science is psychotic(sic) reactions.
18-06-2017 21:42
Wake
★★★★☆
(1195)
litesong wrote:And yet more psychotic reactions.


Loony is as loony does. And you spend all your time "does-ing".
19-06-2017 17:18
Wake
★★★★☆
(1195)
Here is a more distinctive set of charts:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming#/media/File:Global_Temperature_Anomaly.svg

This is the chart distributed by NASA.

And yet the satellite data over the most important period of that chart - 1979 to present (also from NASA) says something ENTIRELY different:

http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/UAH_LT_1979_thru_March_2017_v6.jpg

What I want to know is WHY those jackasses in a studio audience are so willing to laugh instead of listen? Why are the people so adamantly FOR the idea of man-made climate change those who have no scientific training whatsoever?

More importantly you might wish to ask: "What could possibly be behind these things?"

https://www.infowars.com/enviroment-eugenics-quotes/

These are people that have the ears of public officials. I was at a talk given by Dr. Paul Ehrlich and I asked him directly, "Do you understand what you are suggesting?" And he said that he knew EXACTLY what he was suggesting.

As for what brought all this about: http://graduateinstitute.ch/files/live/sites/iheid/files/sites/admininst/shared/doc-professors/luterbacher%20chapter%202%20102.pdf

Reading this paper what you can see is politicians began salivating at the idea of additional power.

Karl Marx wrote in Das Kapital which was essentially a work on economics but it was written from a liberal viewpoint. It pointed out how workers were being exploited. The very thought that company owners could make a profit off of their investments to build and maintain a company was painful to Marx.

Inside this large work was more or less a list of how smart people like himself could save the stupid masses from the exploiters. If he could only have power he could save all these people. What indeed was the case was that any power given to ANYONE will end up in that power being abused as we saw in the USSR and communist China and elsewhere.

Marx couldn't even imagine someone like Henry Ford giving his workers a LARGE raise on the idea that if they were making enough money to pay all their bills and have extra they would buy Ford automobiles. Which is exactly what they did.

But the socialists have not relented simply because socialism has been a failure everywhere it's been tried. We will hear of that marvelous Canadian socialist medical system. We will not hear that Canadians are pouring across the American border to receive medical treatment since serious diseases and conditions have waiting lines so long in Canada that death usually intercedes. Or that many conditions simply aren't treated at all.

So climate change has been nothing more than a strike for power by politicians of both stripes in the USA. Obama ORDERED NOAA to generate a report proving AGW and they acquiesced. It was very easy to do.

Since most of the government owned weather reporting stations were in urban areas all they had to do was not correct for the wild urban growth over the last 150 years. The Urban Heat Island Effect took care of the rest.

Now NOAA and NASA cannot back away from their counterfeited data without suffering the consequences of their lies and the effect it would have on the citizens belief in science in general. So they simply carry on with their lies.
21-06-2017 00:24
litesong
★★★★☆
(1080)
"old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" woofs: you spend all your time "does-ing".

Someone with the name "old sick silly sleepy sleezy slimy steenkin' filthy vile reprobate rooting (& rotting) racist pukey proud pig AGW denier liar whiner wake-me-up" knows what "dozing" is all about.
21-06-2017 00:37
litesong
★★★★☆
(1080)
Since mid-November 2016, Arctic sea ice took a dramatic VOLUME downturn, well below all other years of satellite to date data. Now in mid-June 2017, Arctic sea ice VOLUME has once more joined to date recent years "normal" sea ice & is even tied with levels of 2012. However, as is the recent years normality, Arctic sea ice VOLUME is still 11,000+ cubic kilometers LESS than to date quantities of the 1980's.
Edited on 21-06-2017 00:39
26-06-2017 17:13
litesong
★★★★☆
(1080)
litesong wrote:Since mid-November 2016, Arctic sea ice took a dramatic VOLUME downturn, well below all other years of satellite to date data. Now in mid-June 2017, Arctic sea ice VOLUME has once more joined to date recent years "normal" sea ice & is even tied with levels of 2012. However, as is the recent years normality, Arctic sea ice VOLUME is still 11,000+ cubic kilometers LESS than to date quantities of the 1980's.

As mentioned several times, the Northeast Pacific ocean has been upwelling cold water for 6 months, making for cold fronts moving onto the Canadian terrains, also cooling the Northwest U.S. However, lots of heat the past week, with Seatac almost 10degrees over its previous yesterday's record. Wide spread 95degF temperatures away from the Salish Sea (Puget Sound) region, but still in "cooler" western Washington. Western Washington Renton went to 99deg. Any other temperature records in the area? Of course, nothing like the 120+ temperatures Death Valley.
One of our cars doesn't have a/c. But I did drive it in yesterday's evening. I'd always heard that putting bigger wheels/tires on a car lowers the mpg. Once I put 2 inch larger wheels/tires/treads on one of our cars AND the mpg did go down, but the car drove wonderfully. But now I can't remember if I adjusted for the odometer error. Anyhow, recently I put some larger diameter/tread wheels/tires on two of our cars & adjusted for the odometer error. I'll need more fill-ups, but mpg may have dropped only slightly. We'll see. One car handles better. The other car has more rear wheel hop(always did), due to the heavier wheel/tire combo. But when it grips, it is more positive than previously.
Edited on 26-06-2017 17:25
Page 18 of 18<<<161718





Join the debate Arctic waters not freezing:

Remember me

Related content
ThreadsRepliesLast post
Fast recovery of thick Arctic ice4026-06-2017 00:28
NATO boosts its military presence in the Arctic Circle counter to Arctic Council's humanitarian initi1009-06-2017 20:57
Arctic ice still rapidly decreasing9308-06-2017 02:19
Early 20th Century Arctic Warming2024-05-2017 19:38
Stockholm University is looking for a Arctic Climate Doctorate724-04-2017 18:09
▲ Top of page
Public Poll
Will Arctic summers be ice-free in this century?

Yes

No

Don't know


Thanks for supporting Climate-Debate.com.
Copyright © 2009-2017 Climate-Debate.com | About | Contact